Friction as an activated process



Similar documents
The Heston Model. Hui Gong, UCL ucahgon/ May 6, 2014

1 Sufficient statistics


Practice problems for Homework 11 - Point Estimation

MATH 425, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS.

( ) = ( ) = {,,, } β ( ), < 1 ( ) + ( ) = ( ) + ( )

An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations

Review of Statistical Mechanics

Pacific Journal of Mathematics

3D plasticity. Write 3D equations for inelastic behavior. Georges Cailletaud, Ecole des Mines de Paris, Centre des Matériaux

Math Assignment 6

INSURANCE RISK THEORY (Problems)

Functional Optimization Models for Active Queue Management

EXAMPLE: Water Flow in a Pipe

Fuzzy Differential Systems and the New Concept of Stability

Lecture L6 - Intrinsic Coordinates

Physics 176 Topics to Review For the Final Exam

GI01/M055 Supervised Learning Proximal Methods

Second Order Linear Nonhomogeneous Differential Equations; Method of Undetermined Coefficients. y + p(t) y + q(t) y = g(t), g(t) 0.

7. Beats. sin( + λ) + sin( λ) = 2 cos(λ) sin( )

Math Practice exam 2 - solutions

Level Set Framework, Signed Distance Function, and Various Tools

arxiv: v2 [physics.acc-ph] 27 Oct 2014

Financial Market Microstructure Theory

Displacement (x) Velocity (v) Acceleration (a) x = f(t) differentiate v = dx Acceleration Velocity (v) Displacement x

ANALYZING INVESTMENT RETURN OF ASSET PORTFOLIOS WITH MULTIVARIATE ORNSTEIN-UHLENBECK PROCESSES

Numerical Methods for Differential Equations

Sensitivity Analysis 3.1 AN EXAMPLE FOR ANALYSIS

2.6. Probability. In general the probability density of a random variable satisfies two conditions:

These slides follow closely the (English) course textbook Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning by Christopher Bishop

Planning And Scheduling Maintenance Resources In A Complex System

Chapter 9 Circular Motion Dynamics

Stock Price Dynamics, Dividends and Option Prices with Volatility Feedback

A Uniform Asymptotic Estimate for Discounted Aggregate Claims with Subexponential Tails

Martingale Pricing Applied to Options, Forwards and Futures

Definition and Properties of the Production Function: Lecture

Electromagnetism - Lecture 2. Electric Fields

University of Maryland Fraternity & Sorority Life Spring 2015 Academic Report

Chapter 2: Binomial Methods and the Black-Scholes Formula

Parabolic Equations. Chapter 5. Contents Well-Posed Initial-Boundary Value Problem Time Irreversibility of the Heat Equation

Private Equity Fund Valuation and Systematic Risk

The Heat Equation. Lectures INF2320 p. 1/88

Lecture 13 Linear quadratic Lyapunov theory

Problem Set 3 Solutions

Applications of Second-Order Differential Equations

Multi-variable Calculus and Optimization

Integer Programming: Algorithms - 3

Maximum Likelihood Estimation

where N is the standard normal distribution function,

1 The basic equations of fluid dynamics

Supplement to Call Centers with Delay Information: Models and Insights

Pricing American Options without Expiry Date

Fixed Point Theorems

Simulating Stochastic Differential Equations

Review D: Potential Energy and the Conservation of Mechanical Energy

Slide Basic system Models

Pricing of an Exotic Forward Contract

Statistical Machine Learning from Data

Review of Basic Options Concepts and Terminology

Chapter 2. Parameterized Curves in R 3

Lecture L5 - Other Coordinate Systems

Numerical Methods for Differential Equations

Section 5.1 Continuous Random Variables: Introduction

Final Mathematics 5010, Section 1, Fall 2004 Instructor: D.A. Levin

15 Kuhn -Tucker conditions

Metric Spaces. Chapter Metrics

Introduction to General and Generalized Linear Models

SECOND DERIVATIVE TEST FOR CONSTRAINED EXTREMA

Thermodynamics: Lecture 2

Hedging Options In The Incomplete Market With Stochastic Volatility. Rituparna Sen Sunday, Nov 15

Midterm Solutions. mvr = ω f (I wheel + I bullet ) = ω f 2 MR2 + mr 2 ) ω f = v R. 1 + M 2m

individualdifferences

Lecture Notes on Elasticity of Substitution

JANUARY 2016 EXAMINATIONS. Life Insurance I

Lecture 15. Sergei Fedotov Introduction to Financial Mathematics. Sergei Fedotov (University of Manchester) / 6

Intermittency of earthquake cycles in a model of a three-degree-of-freedom spring-block system

Rolling cylinder on a horizontal plane

Nonlinear Optimization: Algorithms 3: Interior-point methods

L4: Bayesian Decision Theory

I L L I N O I S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN

problem arises when only a non-random sample is available differs from censored regression model in that x i is also unobserved

r (t) = 2r(t) + sin t θ (t) = r(t) θ(t) + 1 = 1 1 θ(t) Write the given system in matrix form x = Ax + f ( ) sin(t) x y z = dy cos(t)

Differentiation of vectors

Probability and Statistics Prof. Dr. Somesh Kumar Department of Mathematics Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur

Faraday s Law of Induction

Overview of Monte Carlo Simulation, Probability Review and Introduction to Matlab

Principles of Electromechanical Energy Conversion

Lecture 1: Stochastic Volatility and Local Volatility

Numerical methods for American options

Transcription:

Friction as an activated process Ondřej Souček, František Gallovič Mathematical Institute of the Charles University in Prague Department of Geophysics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague 30.11.2011 Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 1 / 19

Activated processes In the non-regularized Dieterich ruina slid.law., the slip velocity u was always nonzero. Regularized D.-R. required certain "if" condition u 0) It is possible to reformulate the whole problem as a certain variational principle Presence of the yield activation) condition non-smoothness of the "potentials" Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 2 / 19

First order optimality conditions for a convex non-smooth) function Subdifferential of a convex function f f x) := {x X ; y X : f x) + x, y x f y)} First-order optimality conditions "Smooth" differentiable case) Non-differentiable case Example: df x) = 0 0 f x) Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 3 / 19

Motivation example - a simple model of rate independent friction We define the material by specifying the way it stores energy E dissipates energy R Consider a simple model E = Êt, u, z) R = ˆRż) Let the dissipation potential be positive 1-homogeneous: This implies żrż), ż = Rż) λ 0, ż : Rλż) = λrż) Analogy with the classical irreversible thermodynamics: rate of entropy production i X i J i żr is the thermodynamic force associated with the flux ż. Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 4 / 19

Motivation example - a simple model of rate independent friction Define "Lagrangian" Lt, u, z, ż) := d Et, u, z) + Rż) dt Evolution corresponds to the following variational problem: minimize L Lt, u, z, ż) := d Et, u, z) + Rż) dt = E tt, u, z) + E ut, u, z), u + E zt, u, z), ż + Rż) First-order optimality conditions: 0 = E ut, u, z) minimum energy principle 0 E zt, u, z) + żrż) minimum dissipation potential principle Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 4 / 19

Relation with the "maximum-rate-of-entropy-production principle" Define f := E zt, u, z) "Flow rule" for z: 0 f + żr v, ω Rżv) : ω f, v ż 0 In particular, for v = 0: ω Rż0) : ω f, ż 0 f, ż = max ω, ż ω Rż 0) maximum entropy dissipation principle Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 5 / 19

Variational reformulation of the rate-and-state evolution Motivation: The state- dependence of the friction law and the state evolution lack sufficient thermodynamic reasoning Natural question: Does some of the rate-and-state friction laws correspond to certain dissipation potentials? We confine ourselves to the regularized Dieterich-Ruina sliding law: V0 + V t) µt) = µ 0 + A ln V + V t) θt) = 1 θt) Can we find E, R, s.t.: V0 + V t) 0 θ E + θ R 0 πe + π R ) + B ln 1 + θt) ) V V0 Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 6 / 19

Variational reformulation of the rate-and-state evolution 1 Et, π, θ) = 2 kv pl t t 0) π) 2 κθ ) V0 R 1 θ, π, θ) = σ µ 0 +A ln +B ln 1+θ V V )) 0 π V + ) κθ V0 θ 1 π + κ V 0θ θ R 2 π, θ) = Aσ { ln 1+ π ) V 0 + π ) ln + 1 2 κ θ+ θ π V 0 ) 2 + G 4β π2 ) } 1+ π V + π ) V 0 θ E + θ R 1 + R 2 ) 0 πe + π R 1 + R 2 ) Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 6 / 19

Variational reformulation of the rate-and-state evolution 1 Et, π, θ) = 2 kv pl t t 0) π) 2 κθ ) V0 R 1 θ, π, θ) = σ µ 0 +A ln +B ln 1+θ V V )) 0 π V + ) κθ V0 θ 1 π + κ V 0θ θ R 2 π, θ) = Aσ { ln 1+ π ) V 0 + π ) ln + 1 2 κ θ+ θ π V 0 ) 2 + G 4β π2 ) } 1+ π V + π ) V θ = 1 θ V 0 + π kv pl t t 0 ) π) G ) V0 µ 2β π σ + π 0 +A ln +B ln 1+θ V V ) ) 0 π π V + π Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 6 / 19

Variational reformulation of the rate-and-state evolution 1 Et, π, θ) = 2 kv pl t t 0) π) 2 κθ ) R 1 θ, π, θ) V0 = σ µ 0 +A ln +B ln 1+θ V V )) 0 π V + ) κθ V0 θ 1 π + κ V 0θ θ R 2 π, θ) = Aσ { ln 1+ π ) V 0 + π ) ln + 1 2 κ θ+ θ π V 0 ) 2 + G 4β π2 ) } 1+ π V + π ) V θ = 1 θ V 0 + π kv pl t t 0 ) π) G ) V0 µ 2β π = σ + π 0 +A ln V + π kv pl t t 0) π) G ) V0 2β π σ µ 0 +A ln +B ln V kv pl t t 0 )+π) G ) V0 µ 2β π = σ + π 0 +A ln +B ln V + π +B ln 1+θ V V 0 1+θ V V 0 )) 1+θ V V 0 ) ) if π > 0 if π = 0 ) ) if π < 0 Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 6 / 19

Numerics Numerically, the variational problem was implemented via a semi-implicit discretization in time: First, we discretized the two variational inclusions as follows 0 θ Et k, π k 1, θ k ) + θ Rtk, π k 1, θ k 1, πk 1 π k 2 t k 1 0 πet k, π k, θ k ) + π Rt k, π k 1, θ k 1, πk π k 1 t k, θk θ k 1 t k ), θk θ k 1 t k ) Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 7 / 19

Numerics Numerically, the variational problem was implemented via a semi-implicit discretization in time: First, we discretized the two variational inclusions as follows 0 θ Et k, π k 1, θ k ) + θ Rtk, π k 1, θ k 1, πk 1 π k 2 t k 1 0 πet k, π k, θ k ) + π Rt k, π k 1, θ k 1, πk π k 1 t k, θk θ k 1 t k ), θk θ k 1 t k ) This can be equivalently reformulated as minimize θ k Et k, π k 1, θ k ) + t k Rt k, π k 1, θ k 1, πk 1 π k 2 t k 1 minimize π k Et k, π k, θ k ) + t k Rt k, π k 1, θ k 1, πk π k 1 t k 1, θk θ k 1 t k ), θk θ k 1 t k ) Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 7 / 19

Numerics - results Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 8 / 19

Numerics - results Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 8 / 19

Numerics - results Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 9 / 19

Numerics - results Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 9 / 19

Numerics - results Comparison with the regularized Dieterich-Ruina model computed using the Runge-Kutta integrator and the stopping criterion Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 10 / 19

Advantages of the variational formulation Variational form gives us some insight into the dissipative mechanisms involved, i.e. a good starting point for further generalizations. Rigorous mathematical analysis concerning convergence of the solutions of the discrete problems is achievable for a certain class of models prof. Roubíček). Generalizations for a complex fault structure is straightforward E E dx difficulty only here - nonlocal terms - via elastic Green Ω functions) R R dx locality of R - simple "sum" of the dissipative Ω contributions over space) Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 11 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law Et, π, θ) = 1 2 kv plt t 0) π) 2 κθ The term κθ can be interpreted as the potential energy of the penetration of the surfaces. Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 12 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law V0 + π θ = 1 θ π = 0 : Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 13 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law Non-negativity of the dissipation rate? Are θ and π thermodynamically independent? R 1 θ, π, θ) = ) V0 σ µ 0 +A ln +B ln 1+θ V V )) 0 π V + ) κθ V0 θ 1 π + κ V 0θ θ R 2 π, θ) = Aσ { ln 1+ π ) V 0 + π ) ln + 1 2 κ θ+ θ π V 0 ) 2 + G 4β π2 ) } 1+ π V + π ) V Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 14 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law Non-negativity of the rate-of-dissipation? π R 1 + R 2), π + θ R1 + R2), θ ) V0+ π = σ µ 0+A ln +B ln 1+θ V V0 V + π ) θ π 2 + κ θ + κ θ + θv 0 + π θv0 1 )) π )) Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 15 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law Non-negativity of the rate-of-dissipation? π R 1 + R 2), π + θ R1 + R2), θ ) V0+ π = σ µ 0+A ln +B ln 1+θ V V0 V + π ) θ π 2 + κ θ + κ θ + θv 0 + π θv0 1 )) π )) Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 15 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law Non-negativity of the rate-of-dissipation? π R 1 + R 2), π + θ R1 + R2), θ ) V0+ π = σ µ 0+A ln +B ln 1+θ V V0 V + π ) θ π 2 + κ θ + κ θ + θv 0 + π θv0 1 )) π )) Not: π = 0: ) π R 1 + R 2), π + θ R1 + R2), θ = κ θ θ + θv0 ) ) 2 θ R1 + R2), θ π = 0, θ = θv0 θv0 = κ 2 2 Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 15 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law Non-negativity of the rate-of-dissipation during the evolution? π + V0 θ = 1 θ π R 1 + R 2), π + θ R1 + R2), θ ) = κ θ V0+ π + σ µ 0+A ln +B ln V + π 1+θ V V0 )) π Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 16 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law Non-negativity of the rate-of-dissipation during the evolution? π + V0 θ = 1 θ π R 1 + R 2), π + θ R1 + R2), θ ) = κ θ V0+ π + σ µ 0+A ln +B ln V + π V0+ π κθ + σ µ 0+A ln V + π 1+θ V V0 ) +B ln 1+θ V V0 )) π ) κ V 0σ ) π = Necessary condition for "stability": )) V0 0 κ V 0σ µ 0 + A ln V Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 16 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law Independence of the dissipation mechanisms for θ, π? Let s inspect the two dissipative contributions Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 17 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law Independence of the dissipation mechanisms for θ, π? Let s inspect the two dissipative contributions The lack of separate non-negativity of both contributions suggests that they are not independent dissipative mechanisms. Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 17 / 19

Interpretation of the variational Dieterich-Ruina sliding law - SUMMARY We were able to identify the stored energy E and the dissipation pseudo)potential R corresponding to the regularized Dieterich-Ruina model The state variable θ was interpreted in terms of the penetration depth of the contact. Assuming independence of the dissipative mechanisms for θ, π, the dissipative potentials don t fit the modern thermodynamic viewpoint- we can not ensure non-negativity of the particular dissipations π R 1+R 2), π, θ R1+R2), θ, nor their sum. This suggests that we should try to modify the dissipative potentials in order to still capture the essential dynamics, and simultaneously provide a clear thermodynamic view of the dissipative mechanisms involved. Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 18 / 19

Thank you for your attention! Geodynamical seminar) Friction as an activated process 30.11.2011 19 / 19