(12) Ulllted States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,389,837 B1 Leguia (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 5, 2013



Similar documents
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,253,226 B2 Oguri (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 28, 2012

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. N0.: US 2007/ A1 Makowka (43) Pub. Date: Feb.

(72) Inventors: Juergen RIEDL, Koenigsbrunn (DE); USPC ( 267/285)

Ulllted States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: 6,029,830

US Al (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. N0.: US 2010/ A1 TIRPAN (43) Pub. Date: Mar.

60 REDIRECTING THE PRINT PATH MANAGER 1

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1 Clegg (43) Pub. Date: Sep.

(54) (71) (72) (21) (22) (51) (52)

(12) (10) Patent N0.: US 6,740,055 B2 Dominguez (45) Date of Patent: May 25, 2004

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. N0.: US 2014/ A1 Shaw (43) Pub. Date: Jul.

(12) United States Patent (16) Patent N6.= US 6,198,814 B1 Gill (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 6, 2001

Telephone Dressing Systems - Advantages and Disadvantages

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,695,377 B2 Bachelier et a]. (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 15, 2014

17 Claims, 19 Drawing Sheets EG4 SD4 {8L4 ( I; DLI Q P A. \! v,zcll. RG1 7 / l. a U ' 14 A I 1) ~ $ _. _. _. T. _. _. _. /,.

Analysis of an Acoustic Guitar

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 7,068,424 B1 Jennings et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 27, 2006

US Al (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1 Sanvido (43) Pub. Date: Jun.

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. N0.: US 2002/ A1. Mannarsamy (43) Pub. Date: NOV.

Ulllted States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: 5,992,923. Wycech [45] Date 0f Patent: Nov. 30, 1999

United States Patent [191 [11] Patent Number: 4,895,256

United States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: 4,893,344

I4 '2 ORLANDO J. CHIAPPE Y.

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/ A1 Owhadi et al. (43) Pub. Date: Feb.

1iillllllllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllill

Patent Application Publication Sep. 30, 2004 Sheet 1 0f 2. Hierarchical Query. Contact Ow FIG. 1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,922,042 B2 Rossignol (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 12, 2011

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,721,047 B2 Sakurai et a]. (45) Date of Patent: May 13, 2014

United States Patent [191 Romo et al.

(54) LOTTERY METHOD Publication Classi?cation

\ \ \ connection connection connection interface interface interface

' 2,092,586 SCREW DRIVER. Filed July 24, ' 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 INVENTOR. Sl qjarz Mama/{ck 1 _ / ' ATTORNEY

lllir United States Patent [19] e4/'\:\\ 5,884,435 Mar. 23, Ky? / I50 Patent Number: Date of Patent: [11] [45] David et al.

wanagamem transformation and management

CROWN ABUTMENT TOOTH (54) (75) (73) (21) (22) (30) Shogo YAMAMOTO, Shinjuku-ku. GC Corporation, ltabashi-ku (JP) Foreign Application Priority Data

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1 Ollis et al. HOME PROCESSOR /\ J\ NETWORK

(54) (71) (72) Vedelago (TV) (IT) (73) (21) (22) (30) Chirignago (VE) (IT); Alberto Al?er, Foreign Application Priority Data

(Us) (73) Assignee: Avaya Technology Corp. Je?' McElroy, Columbia, SC (US); (21) Appl. No.: 10/413,024. (22) Filed: Apr. 14, 2003 (57) ABSTRACT

i X USE HOST USB B R CONTROLLER 111a 40 11a 1 21

(12) United States Patent Edelen

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,512,370 B2 Sorensen (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 20, 2013

United States Patent [191

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.2 US 6,767,167 B1 Rials (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 27, 2004

lllllllllllllllllllllllllllilllllllllllliilllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. N0.: US 2013/ A1 DANG (43) Pub. Date: Jul.

Hay (43) Pub. Date: Oct. 17, 2002

(12) United States Patent Petralia

(12) Unlted States Patent (10) Patent N0.2 US 7,428,664 B2 Sirbu (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 23, 2008

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,349,484 B2 Do et a]. (45) Date of Patent: Jan. 8, 2013

Story (43) Pub. Date: Apr. 26, 2001

(12) United States Patent Halonen

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1 Fukuzato (43) Pub. Date: Jun.

How they invented chord patterns for the guitar. J. Chaurette. Dec., 2012

US Al (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1 Voight et al. SUBSCRIBER DATABASE.

(54) METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR FINDING Publication Classi?cation CONNECTIONS AMONG SUBSCRIBERS TO AN CAMPAIGN (51) Int- Cl

(12) United States Patent Hedman et a].

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1 Chen (57)

I SEARCH DATABASE l/ VISIT WEBSITE k ( UPDATE RECORDS Y (54) (75) (73) (21) (22) (63) (60) (US); Gary Stephen Shuster, Oakland, SELECT SUB-DOMAIN NAME

(12) United States Patent

(71) Applicant: SPEAKWRITE, LLC,Austin, TX (US)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,282,471 B1 Korner (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 9, 2012

(12> Ulllted States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 6,591,288 B1 Edwards et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 8, 2003

US B1 (12) United States Patent. (10) Patent N0.: US 6,282,278 B1 D0ganata et al. (45) Date 0f Patent: Aug. 28, 2001

(12) (10) Patent N0.: US 7,069,466 B2 Trimmer et a]. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 27, 2006

(12) Ulllted States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,519,268 B2 Leipold et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 27, 2013

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. N0.: US 2013/ A1 Simburg (43) Pub. Date: Dec.

(12) (10) Patent N0.: US 6,634,830 B1 Marshall (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 21, 2003

US Al (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1 Weng et al. (43) Pub. Date: Sep.

3,213,816. Oct. 26, / V//////////A 22 "71% / ' ///////1 J. SOLANKA. Filed Feb. 25, Sheets-Sheet s 34 3o, o ATTORNEY

(43) Pub. Date: Feb. 16, 2012

Emergency Spill Basis For Collecting And Collecting?

Pole Lathe and Shave Horse Design

Beginners Guide to the Walkingbass

US Al (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. N0.: US 2012/ A1 Lundstrom (43) Pub. Date: NOV.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,740,091 B2 Stobbe et a]. (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 3, 2014

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,716,730 B2 Wang et al. (45) Date of Patent: May 6, 2014

llllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Electric Guitar/Electric Bass/Acoustic Guitar/Classic Guitar Produced by ARIA Owner s Manual

(12) United States Patent Armenio et a].

llllllllllllllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

United States Patent [191

/ \33 40 \ / \\ \ \ M / f 1. (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication Lawser et al. NETWORK \ 36. SERVlCE 'NTERNET SERVICE

Guidelines for Earthquake Bracing Residential Water Heaters

US A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2002/ A1 STRANDBERG (43) Pub. Date: Oct.

(12) Ulllted States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,532,017 B2 Ojala et a]. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 10, 2013

Power Control / Shut-off Power Control / Shut-off

(12) United States Patent Gomiciaga-Pereda et a].

Fine Tuning. By Alan Carruth Copyright All Rights Reserved.

l / Normal End, client 1 granted access to " System 1

(12) United States Patent Gomiciaga-Pereda et a1.

NOV. 21, 1967 P J, FELLNER, JR 3,353,652 FEEDING AND INDEXING DEVICE FOR PACKAGE HANDLING APPARATUS. Filed May 25, Sheets-Sheet 1 /, 27

(75) Inventor: Shawn Fennell, Freeland, MD (US) E04B 1/66 g2oo6~olg

United States Patent [191

NETWORK BOUNDARY PRIVATE NETWORK PUBLIC _1 NETWORK

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll llllllllllilllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Lookup CNAM / other database for calllng

Naylor, Lake OsWego, OR (US) (51) Int_ CL

(54) (75) ( ) (73) (21) (22) (63) Peschel, Schoengeising (DE); (30) Foreign Application Priority Data. Robert Trimpe, Wessling (DE)

Umted States Patent [19] [11] Patent Number: 4,854,653 Lakso [45] Date of Patent: Aug. 8, 1989

(IP Connection) Miami (54) (76) (21) (22) (51) (52) Application

(12) United States Patent Wen et a].

Transcription:

US008389837B1 (12) Ulllted States Patent (10) Patent N0.: US 8,389,837 B1 Leguia (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 5, 2013 (54) STRINGED INSTRUMENT HAVINGA 4,836,076 A 6/1989 Bernier FRETBOARD CANTILEVERED OVER THE 2 1g; aeolian Jr~ er a1~,, ep ens SOUNDBOARD 4,969,381 A 11/1990 Decker, Jr. et al. _ I _ 5,895,872 A * 4/1999 Chase..... 84/291 (75) Inventor: Luls G. Legu1a,M1lton, MA (US) 5,952,592 A 9/1999 Teel 5,955,688 A 9/1999 Cook (73) Assignee: Luis and Clark, Inc., Milton, OH (US) 6,034,309 A 3/2000 Teel et 31. 6,087,568 A 7/2000 Seal * ~. ~ ~ ~ - 6,107,552 A 8/2000 Coomar et al. ( ) Not1ce. Subject to any ((111s(c1la1me5,thet1ermdofth1s 6,420,638 B2 7/2002 Teel patent 1s exten e or a Juste un er 35 6,605,766 B2 800% Teel U.S.C. 154(b) by 88 days. 6,664,452 B1 12/2003 Teel 6,965,065 B2 11/2005 McPherson (21) Appl' No; 12/303,230 2008/0190264 A1 * 8/2008 Jones et al...... 84/314 R (22) Filed: Jun. 21, 2010 OTHER PUBLICATIONS Brune, R. E., Eight Concerns of Highly Successful Guitar Makers, (51) Int. Cl. Proceedings of the GAL Convention, 2001. G10D 3/04 (2006.01) (52) us. Cl...... 84/314 R; 84/267 * Cited by examiner (58) Field of Classi?cation Search..... 84/314 R See application?le for complete search history. Prlmary Exammer * Chnstopher Uhhr (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm * Christine M. Kuta (56) References Cited (57) ABSTRACT U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS A composite fretboard has a tapered form and a cantilevered 3,699,836 10/1972 Glasser end. A guitar constructed With the fretboard is able to main 3,962,946 6/1976 Rlckard tain certain elements of classical guitar form With a sound 3,992,972 11/1976 4,084,475 4/1978?lgiavflciltz 84/291 board able to vibrate freely producing an improved sound 4,084,476 4/1978 Richard quality 4,145,948 3/1979 Turner 4,408,516 10/1983 John 8 Claims, 5 Drawing Sheets [20 205 I l I 0 p15)

US. Patent Mar. 5,2013 Sheet 1 of5 US 8,389,837 B1 100- I20 1'30 I35 FIG. 1

US. Patent Mar. 5,2013 Sheet 2 of5 US 8,389,837 B1 N0 How 5 I75 FIG. 2

US. Patent Mar. 5,2013 Sheet 3 of5 US 8,389,837 B1 \/ 200 FIG. 3 165/ 2051 \4 175\ I: 115

US. Patent Mar. 5,2013 Sheet 4 of5 US 8,389,837 B1 4r no) FIG. 4

i US. Patent Mar. 5,2013 Sheet 5 of5 US 8,389,837 B1 115 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\N //// / ////////// ///////////////////////////'. 250 110 FIG. 5

1 STRINGED INSTRUMENT HAVING A FRETBOARD CANTILEVERED OVER THE SOUNDBOARD BACKGROUND In a hollow-body acoustic guitar, the musical tones pro duced by the strings are intensi?ed and enriched by the supplementary vibration induced in the guitar body including the top, also referred to as the soundboard. Accordingly, it is desirable that the guitar be constructed such that the sound board is able to vibrate as freely as possible. Further, it is desirable that the guitar construction have the necessary strength to support the forces exerted by the taut strings on the neck and body. The strings transmit sound vibrations to the soundboard through a bridge mounted to the front face of the soundboard over Which the strings are tightly strung. To compensate for the tension forces produced by the strings, conventional guitars generally include a signi?cant amount of structural reinforcement, e.g., various con?gura tions of braces in and on the guitar body and tension bars in the neck. These reinforcements add considerably to the manufacturing cost and Weight of the instrument and are known to affect the tone of the instrument. Accordingly, in the construction of conventional instruments some compromise is generally made, and structural integrity is attained in some instrument designs at some sacri?ce to the instrument s acoustical performance. In some cases, the compromise is such that the instrument deviates from an accepted classical form so that, While the instrument produces an adequate sound, the instrument design may be uncomfortable for the musician. Conventional guitars typically include a support structure in and/or on the body of the guitar for the fretboard. In some guitars, the fretboard is supported by a support structure between the soundboard and the fretboard. The support struc ture in these conventional designs tends to dampen the action of the soundboard. In some guitars, the fretboard is supported by the soundboard itself and is joined to the soundboard, for example, by glue. As described above, the tension of the strings tends to cause the guitar to bend toward the strings. In those guitars Where the fretboard is glued to the soundboard, this tension can cause the fretboard to press down on the soundboard and deform it Which affects the sound quality and playability of the instrument. Conventional art attempts to improve sound quality and the structural integrity of the guitar have included exploring vari ous alternative soundboard designs and the use of various construction schema using Wood and composite materials. There remains, however, a need for a guitar assembly that provides improved sound quality With minimal structural reinforcement. SUMMARY The present invention is directed to a hollow-body guitar having an improved cantilevered fretboard that enables the guitar soundboard to vibrate freely thereby providing improved sound quality, the fretboard being further shaped and con?gured such that the guitar conforms to certain ele ments of a classical design. In one embodiment, a guitar having a body and a neck constructed from composite materials further includes a com posite fretboard. An example composite material suitable for such a guitar construction is a carbon?ber matrix. The fret board is formed and con?gured to cantilever over the sound board Without any support structure resting on top of the US 8,389,837 B1 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 2 soundboard. The soundboard is thereby able to vibrate more freely. The fretboard further is tapered such that it provides structure to the neck of the guitar enabling the guitar to conform to established classical design With minimal Weight and deformation under string tension. The present invention together With the above and other advantages may best be understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments of the invention illustrated in the drawings, Wherein: DRAWINGS FIG. 1 is a top view of a guitar according to principles of the invention; FIG. 2 is a side view of the guitar of FIG. 1; FIG. 3 is a side view ofa fretboard ofthe guitar of FIG. 1; FIG. 4 is a side view of a portion of the guitar of FIG. 1 showing the cantilevered portion of the fretboard; and FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the neck of the guitar of FIG. 1. DESCRIPTION A hollow body acoustic guitar largely constructed from composite materials further includes a tapered and cantile vered composite fretboard. The term guitar refers to a musical instrument of the chor dophone family, being a stringed instrument played by pluck ing, either With?ngers or a pick. The guitar embodiments in the present invention are hollow body acoustic guitars of the type generally known as classical guitars. The term composite material means a material compo sition made chie?y of two or more materials, such as carbon?bers embedded in an epoxy resin matrix With the?bers either being arranged randomly, unidirectionally or Woven into a fabric. The combination of the two or more materials (reinforcing elements,?llers, and composite matrix binder), differ in form or composition on a macroscale. The constitu ent materials retain their identities, that is, they do not dis solve or merge completely into one another although they act in concert. FIG. 1 shows a guitar 100 having a hollow body 105 and a neck 110. The body 105 has a soundboard 120 With an aper ture referred to as a sound hole 125. A bridge 130 is mounted to the soundboard 120. The bridge 130 includes a saddle 135. The neck 110 has a fretboard 115, also referred to as a?n gerboard, and a head stock 140. Strings 145 are attached at?rst attachment points at the head stock 140, pass over a guide referred to as a nut 150, extend along the neck 110 and across the sound hole 125, then over the saddle 135 and attach at second attachment points on the bridge 130. The strings 145 are maintained in a tensioned state between the nut 150 and the saddle 135. The guitar 100 of the present invention is largely con structed of composite materials. The body 105, neck 110 and fretboard 115 are, for example, constructed from a carbon?ber matrix. The fretboard 115 of the present guitar embodi ment takes advantage of the strength of composite materials and has a tapered design to enable a cantilever over the sound board 120 such that the fretboard 115 is not supported on the soundboard 120. The cantilever ensures that the soundboard 120 is able to vibrate freely Without interference from the fretboard 115. Further, the composite structure and the tapered design of the fretboard 115 provide the advantages of lightweight construction While providing stiffness that enables the guitar to conform to certain elements of classical guitar design. This is described in further detail below.

3 FIG. 2 is a side view ofthe guitar of FIG. 1. FIG. 2 shows a guitar 100 having a hollow body 105 and a neck 110 and a head stock 140. The body 105 has a soundboard 120 and a bridge 130. The bridge 130 includes a saddle 135. The neck 110 has a fretboard 115, also referred to as a?ngerboard. In one embodiment, the back and sides of the body 105, the neck 110 and the head stock 140 are formed as a single piece using composite materials such as a carbon?ber matrix. The neck 110 is closed off from the body 105. The soundboard 120 is mounted to and forms a cover over the body 105. The fret board 115 is mounted to and forms a cover over the neck 110. In established classical guitar form, the neck of the guitar is not coplanar With the soundboard. The neck is typically angled such that the nut end is 2-6 mm above the plane 165 of the soundboard Where the soundboard plane is de?ned by the soundboard at the edge. In other Words, the plane de?ned by the fretboard forms an angle between 0.5 and 4 degrees With the plane de?ned by the soundboard. This angle enables a lower bridge to be implemented Which in turn affects the height of the strings over the soundboard and fretboard. Com promises made in conventional guitar design have included larger and thicker necks and necks having a much larger angle in order to compensate for other design considerations including the design of the bridge. The neck angle shown in FIG. 2 is exaggerated for clarity. Guitars according to embodiments of the present invention are able to conform to the lower-angled classical form. Returning to FIG. 2, the fretboard 115 has a head end 170 Where the headstock 140 meets the neck 110 and a foot end 175 at the sound hole 125 (not visible in this view). The fretboard 115 in the present guitar embodiment has a?rst taper extending generally from the head end 170 to approxi mately the area of the twelfth fret. Alternatively, the?rst taper extends generally to the point 180 Where the neck meets the guitar body. The head end 170 of the fretboard is relatively thin, for example 4 mm in thickness. The fretboard 115 is made gradually thicker in the direction of the soundboard Where the thickest point is, for example, 6 mm in thickness. A second taper begins at or after the thickest point and extends to the foot end 175 of the fretboard 115. The tapers are described in greater detail below With regard to FIG. 3. The fretboard 115 further has a cantilever portion 165 over the soundboard 120 such that there is no support structure between the fretboard 115 and the soundboard 120. This enables the soundboard 120 of the present embodiment to vibrate freely. The cantilever is described in greater detail below With regard to FIGS. 3 and 4. FIG. 3 is a side view of the fretboard 115. The fretboard 115 has a head end 170 and a foot end 175 and is constructed from composite materials as described above. The fretboard 115 has a?rst taper 200 extending from the head end 170 to approximately the twelfth fret in one arrangement and, in a second arrangement, approximately to the point Where the neck 110 meets the body 105 of the guitar. The thickness of the fretboard 115 at the thickest point of the?rst taper 200 is, for example, 6 mm. The thickness of the?rst taper at the thinnest point at the head end 170 is, for example, 4-4.5 mm. The fretboard 115 further has a second taper 205 in the can tilever 165 portion of the fretboard 115. The thickness of the second taper at the foot end 175 is, for example 4-4.5 mm. In a?rst arrangement, the second taper 205 is approximately 1.5 inches long. In a second arrangement, the second taper 205 extends from the foot end 175 for approximately the length of the cantilever 165. The force of the strings in tension typically tends to cause stringed instruments to bend in the direction of the strings. The composite construction of the present fretboard 115 pro US 8,389,837 B1 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 4 vides strength and stability to the present guitar, particularly the neck 110, so that the angle of the neck as described above is maintained even under string tension. The?rst taper 200 also minimizes the amount of material in the fretboard thereby reducing the overall Weight of the guitar. The thickest portion of the fretboard 115 at the point Where the neck meets the guitar body enables the fretboard to be cantilevered above the soundboard. The second taper 205 has two functions. First, the second taper 205 provides that adequate space between the soundboard 120 and the fretboard 115 is created and maintained. Second, should the instrument bend forward, the second taper 205 tends to prevent the fretboard 115 from touching the soundboard 120. The fretboard thicknesses pro vided here are merely exemplary. The present invention is not considered limited by the measurements provided here. FIG. 4 is a side view of a portion of the guitar of FIG. 1 showing the cantilevered portion of the fretboard. The fret board 115 is supported by the neck 110. The neck 110 is closed off from the body 1 05. The portion of the fretboard 1 15 over the soundboard 120 forms a cantilever 165 spaced apart from the soundboard 120. The space between the sound board and the foot end 175 of the fretboard is for example 6.3 mm. Accordingly, the fretboard 1 15 does not touch the soundboard 120 thereby enabling the soundboard 120 to vibrate freely. FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the neck of the guitar of FIG. 1. The neck 110 is hollow having a space 250 below the fretboard 115. The neck 110 is shaped and con?gured to support the fretboard 115 including accommodation for the?rst taper of the fretboard and the cantilever. In some embodi ments, the fretboard 115 is slightly arched across its Width. Typically, the arch is a millimeter in height. Among the rea sons for providing such an arch is the comfort of the musician. The arch is typically included near the top 170 of the fretboard 115 through the cantilever 165. It is to be understood that the above-identi?ed embodi ments are simply illustrative of the principles of the invention. Various and other modi?cations and changes may be made by those skilled in the art Which Will embody the principles of the invention and fall Within the spirit and scope thereof. What is claimed is: 1. A fretboard for a composite guitar, the composite guitar having a body and a neck, the neck having a head and a foot, the composite guitar including a soundboard, the fretboard comprising: an elongated member constructed from a composite matrix, the elongated member having a?rst portion con?gured to conform to at least one element of classical design, the?rst portion to be attached to the neck of the composite guitar and having a head end corresponding to the head of the neck and a foot end corresponding to the foot of the neck, the?rst portion having a taper having a thin end at the head end and increasing in thickness toward the foot end, and a second portion con?gured to cantilever over the soundboard When the fretboard is mounted on the guitar such that the sound board provides no support to the fretboard, the second portion having an anchored end Where the neck meets the body of the composite guitar and a free end, the second portion further has a taper, the taper of the second portion being thinnest at the free end, and Wherein the taper of the second portion extends for 1.5 inches from the free end. 2. The fretboard of claim 1 Wherein the at least one element of classical design is an angle de?ned by the fretboard and the soundboard Where the angle is between 0.5 and 4 degrees.

5 3. The fretboard of claim 1 wherein the taper of the?rst portion is equivalent in length With the neck of the composite guitar. 4. The fretboard of claim 1 Wherein the composite matrix further comprises carbon?ber. 5. A composite guitar, comprising: a body, a neck and a headstock being integrally formed of a composite matrix, the neck having a head and a foot; a composite matrix soundboard mounted to the body; and a fretboard formed of a composite matrix, the fretboard having a?rst portion con?gured to conform to at least one element of classical design, the?rst portion being mounted to the neck, the?rst portion having a head end corresponding to the head of the neck and a foot end corresponding to the foot of the neck, the?rst portion having a taper having a thin end at the head end and increasing in thickness toward the foot end, and the fretboard having a second portion con?gured to cantile ver over the soundboard When the fretboard is mounted US 8,389,837 B1 6 on the guitar such that the soundboard provides no sup port to the fretboard, the second portion having an anchored end Where the neck meets the body of the composite guitar and a free end, the second portion further has a taper, the taper of the second portion being thinnest at the free end of the second portion, and Wherein the taper of the second portion extends for 1.5 inches from the free end. 6. The composite guitar of claim 5 Wherein the at least one 10 element of classical design is an angle de?ned by the fret board and the soundboard Where the angle is between 0.5 and 4 degrees. 7. The composite guitar of claim 5 Wherein the taper of the?rst portion is equivalent in length With the neck of the com 15 posite guitar. 8. The composite guitar of claim 5 Wherein the composite matrix further comprises carbon?ber. * * * * *