Norwegian Tax Authority - Oslo Norway



Similar documents
School in Schwanenstadt, Austria

Klosterenga, Oslo, Norway, page - 1

IEA SHC Task 47 Renovation of Non-Residential Buildings towards Sustainable Standards

The first apartment house renovation with Passive House components in Norway

Improving thermal insulation of concrete sandwich panel buildings

Energy Efficient HVAC-system and Building Design

Case study on residential building renovation and its impact on the energy use and thermal comfort

Franciscan Monastery, Graz, Austria

Directorate for the Built Environment Building Standards Division

Energy Efficiency in Buildings

Extra Low Energy Housing in Ireland How far should we go to the Passive House? Jonathan Jennings Head of R&D Kingspan Century Homes

Dienstleistung. Certification as "Quality Approved Passive House" Criteria for Residential-Use Passive Houses

1..GENERAL DATA 2. CLIMATIC DATA. Location

Energy savings in the residential area are essential in

BYG DTU. Thermal properties of window frame Type 1 Sheet: 1. Type: Side, top and bottom profile. Source file: Format: dwg/dxf bmp

FACTORS AFFECTING ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF BUILDINGS

Solar Homes Catch the Sun. Are you planning a new house? Discover how you can apply solar architecture principles to:

Energy audit in Finland

Delivering on innovation and market uptake. Best-in-cases of nzeb. Ramon Pascual Bucharest May 8th, 2015

Towards low energy buildings the development of building regulations in Norway. Clara Good, Norut Narvik Oulu, 27 May 2011

Green House, Hungary

DK2 IEA. Replacing mechanical ventilation with natural ventilation at Enghøjskolen school in Denmark

Clean Energy Solutions Center IEA Technology Roadmap: Energy Efficient Building Envelopes Launch

HOW AN ENERGY EFFICIENT HOME CAN HELP THE ENVIRONMENT

RULES FOR THE SETTING UP OF SUSTAINABLE BRANCHES Summary

Improving comfort and energy efficiency in a nursery school design process S. Ferrari, G. Masera, D. Dell Oro

BEST 3, Atlanta, April 2012 Grahame E. Maisey, P.E.

Passive & Active Design

CAN DEMAND CONTROLLED VENTILATION REPLACE SPACE HEATING IN OFFICE BUILDINGS WITH LOW HEATING DEMAND?

Residential HVAC Load Sizing Training October 14, David Kaiser Green Code Plan Reviewer

Air Conditioning. The opportunity for energy efficiency. Low cost actions to reduce energy usage now

Data Collection Summary Report

9 Energy management. 9:1 General. BFS 2011:26 BBR Oct. 9:11 Scope of application

Does Green Building pay? Danish decisions and German experiences Green Building Council Denmark and AHK in Copenhagen the

EnergyPro Building Energy Analysis. Assisted Living Building

CO2 Emissions. Indirect CO 2. Emissions Electricity and Heat Production 25 % Direct Emissions AFOLU 24 % Energy 1,4% Buildings 6,4 % Industry 11 %

Ecofys VII U-Values for Better Energy Performance of Buildings

Assessment Methods. 15 th November 2010 Huw Jenkins Simon Lannon

Challenging the possibilities

Low energy class 1 typehouses according to the Danish building regulations

THE EFFECT OF WINDOW POSITION AND WINDOW SIZE ON THE ENERGY DEMAND FOR HEATING, COOLING AND ELECTRIC LIGHTING. R.M.J. Bokel

Heat Recovery from Data Centres Conference Designing Energy Efficient Data Centres

Design of a zero energy office building

THE NATIONAL BUILDING REGULATIONS PART XA: ENERGY EFFICIENCY. Presentation by Peter Henshall-Howard: HEAD: BUILDING DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT.

Air Conditioning, Comfort and Energy in India s Commercial Building Sector

Before You Start an Energy Efficiency Retrofit The Building Envelope

Mechanical and Natural Ventilation

Innovative solution for heat recovery of ventilation air in older apartment buildings - with low intervention affecting the residents

2014 British Columbia Building Code Changes

Dispelling the Solar Myth - Evacuated Tube versus Flat Plate Panels. W illiam Comerford Sales Manager Ireland Kingspan Renewables Ltd.

Module 3.7. Thermal bridging

HEAT LOAD AND SOLAR GAIN PREDICTION FOR SOLID WALL DWELLINGS RETROFITTED WITH TRIPLE VACUUM GLAZING FOR SELECTED WINDOW TO WALL AREA RATIOS

Passive House Projects in Norway an Overview

Condensing Boiler Efficiency

Greenhouse Gas Implications of HVAC Upgrades in Multi-Unit Residential Buildings

BPC Green Builders. Green building for new and existing homes. Health Comfort Energy

AIR CONDITIONING EFFICIENCY F8 Energy eco-efficiency opportunities in Queensland Foundries

Portuguese Certification System for Energy an Indoor Air Quality Statistical Information about the Portuguese Certification System

BREEAM Refurbishment and Fit-out 2014 Briefings. Part of the BRE Trust

IDA Early Stage Building Optimization (ESBO) User guide

A comparative study of energy certification systems for buildings

De energievoorziening in 2040;

The Reunion experience

Achieving Net Zero. Bradley Berneche, President Alouette Homes. National Marketing Committee Canadian Home Builders Association Ottawa, June 6, 2008

PROBIS SUPPORTING PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OF BUILDING INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS

D5.3 Energy audit report

Sustainable Strategies for Rehabilitation Projects: 9th Street Office Building Adaptive Reuse Case Study

Passive house rehabilitation of post war residential building in Zug, Switzerland

Passiv Haus Institut. Certification as "Quality Approved Passive House" Criteria for Residential-Use Passive Houses

WORKSHOP: The roles of wood in green building and green building effects on the forest sector of in the UNECE region.

Integrated Solar Radiant Systems

Rainwater Harvesting

Distributed Energy Systems

Introduction to DEAP for Professionals DWELLING ENERGY ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE (DEAP)

Industrial Green Building Retrofit 101 Opportunities and Challenges. Light Industrial Green Building Retrofits. Why Green Retrofit?

BCA Green Mark for Restaurants

HVAC Costs. Reducing Building. Building owners are caught between two powerful forces the need to lower energy costs. By Stephen J.

Holistic Approach in Delivering Government Buildings The Low Carbon Concept

Green Affordable Housing Development Case Eco-Viikki, Finland

Energy-Plus Primary School, Hohen Neuendorf, Germany

Building Energy Labels: The Swiss MINERGIE Label

State of Connecticut Department of Public Health RADON PROGRAM

Archant London Environmental Awards

Sea Water Heat Pump Project

Exemplary Retrofitting of an Old School in Stuttgart - EROS -

Home Energy Efficiency and Conservation: Call to Action. July 23, 2015 Dave Blake and David Wood REEP Green Solutions

Energy Management in Wuppertal

Heat pumps: better by nature

HEAT PUMP FOR DISTRICT COOLING AND HEATING AT OSLO AIRPORT, GARDERMOEN

Transcription:

1. INTRODUCTION Norwegian Tax Authority - Oslo Norway PROJECT SUMMARY Year of construction - 1980 No previous energy renovations SPECIAL FEATURES Main topics in the renovation are: High insulated pre fabricated façades Airtightness 0,6 h-1 Reduced surface to volumen ratio Energy recovery from data facility I basement of building High efficiency technical systems, COP cooling systems, efficient heat recovery, and low SFP ARCHITECT LPO Achitects AS, Oslo Project Management Optimoprosjekt Consultant Sweco, Multiconsult, Hambra, Energeticadesign Partners ENOVA, Norway, Future built, Norway OWNER Entra Eiendom as Brochure Arne Førland Larsen Contact: arne.forlandlarsen@asplanviak.no IEA SHC Task 47 Renovation of Non-Residential Buildings towards Sustainable Standards

2. CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND BACKGROUND The building is situated in the center of Oslo, close to public transportation and to a highway with heavy traffic. The entire building has an area of 35.119 m 2 (internal area without outer walls including basement 6.670 m 2 ) The building is programmed for approximately 1300 person, which makes an average area of 27 m 2 pr. person. The organization have focus on low energy equipment, thin Client computers are used on all workplaces. Typical floor plan before refurbishment Typical floor plan after refurbishment OBJECTIVES OF THE RENOVATION Overall goals for the project are: Energy label A Passive house standard In addition to the overall goals: Entra environmental policy, a specific Environmental Quality Assurance Program and a Quality Control Plan, where stated for the project. Entra environmental policy states that all their projects should include environmental program and plans.

2. CONTEXT AND BACKGROUND 3 D model of building after refurbishment OBJECTIVES OF THE RENOVATION The objectives and focus areas are: Energy objectives, 50% demands of Norwegian building codes. Indoor climate, in average level 1/2 according to EN 15251 Low emission and sustainable materials Reduction on water use Building waste during entire life cycle Clean building processes Sustainable solution and materials with high durability Lowering energy for transportation in building construction stage, encourage public transportation and bicycling in maintaining stage Follow environmental quality control plan for following up and running assessments in all stages of the design process SUMMARY OF THE RENOVATION The overall expected percentage reduction in primary energy consumption is ~ 60%

3. DECISION MAKING PROCESSES The initial project objectives were to refurbish the interior of the building, and energy was not at the time the main objective. The energy goal was energy label B. Through a process with building owner and users, the ambition was increased to energy label A / Passive house. Public funding programs involved are granted for this project. ENOVA, a Norwegian funding program, will be funding 50% of the extra Investment to improve the energy design from building codes minimum to a 50% below. Maximum funding is limited to ~69 Euro/m 2 The project has been granted a maximum funding of 2.400.000 Euro. Reduced operation using calculated payback time has been made for the application to Enova. Timeline for the decision making process Idea was born 01.09.2009 First brief project description completed 01.02.2010 Detailed project description completed 01.03.2011 Tendering process started 01.03.2011 Signing of contract with main contractor 01.06.2011 Start renovation 01.08.2011 Renovation completed Not completed Evaluation among occupants Not completed

4. BUILDING ENVELOPE Roof construction : U-value: < 0,12 W/m 2 K (average value) (Roof construction over basement 0,5-0,8 below terrain have now insulation before refurbishment. Average U value before refurbishment for roof 0,5 W/m 2 ) Wall construction : U-value: < 0,14 (average value above ground) U-value: < 0,47 (average value below ground) Windows: : U-value: < 0,72 (average value) Thermal bridge avoidance: Focus on thermal bridges in: Mounting of windows Insulation thickness where concrete slabs meets the façade Wood facade construction with few thermal bridges., and 200 mm insualtion in front of slabs. Overall demand to thermal bridges are: < 0,04 W/m 2 K Summary of U-values [W/m²K] Before Roof/attic ~ 0,2 1,0 (average 0,5) After 0,12 Floor/slab ~ 0,1 0,1 Walls ~ 0,2 0,4 0,17 Ceilings ~ 0,3 0,12 Windows ~1,8 0,72 Examples sections for walls

5. BUILDING SERVICES SYSTEM OVERALL DESIGN STRATEGY The overall design strategy based on: Optimizing the building envelope Optimizing technical system Utilization / recovery of energy from data facility in the building Reduced envelope to volume ratio and avoid cooling fingers LIGHTING SYSTEM The existing lighting system is a traditional system with an estimated LENI number ~25 kwh/m 2 year New lighting system has an estimated LENI number ~14 kwh/m 2 year HEATING SYSTEM Before - Electrical heating After - Water based heating systems COOLING SYSTEM Before Central cooling of inlet air for mechanical ventilation After Cooling system will be based on: Central AC mechanical ventilation Cooled beams in areas with high internal loads (in area with high cooling demands, meeting rooms and office areas with high internal loads)

5. BUILDING SERVICES SYSTEM HEATING SYSTEM Before - Electrical heating After - Water based heating systems VENTILATION Before CAV mechanical ventilation After VAV mechanical ventilation HOT WATER PRODUCTION Before - Central electrical heated boiler After - Central boiler heated with waste energy from data Facility in basement in combination with electricity/ district heating RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS Before none, all energy consumption was based on electrical supply. After - Reuse of waste energy from data facilities in basement in combination with district heating from public supply. Night cooling strategy for reduced cooling.

6. ENERGY PERFORMANCES Energy performance (kwh/m 2 ) Before: ~ 190 kwh/m 2 year ( measured ) ~ 174 kwh/m 2 year (estimated net energy consumption which is including sub consumptions according to Norwegian regulation, comparable with calculated consumption, see figure) ~170 kwh/m 2 year (estimated primary energy consumption which is including sub consumptions according to Norwegian regulation, comparable with calculated consumption, see figure) After: 88 kwh/m 2 year (calculated net) 84 kwh/m 2 year (calculated primary) Overall savings target : From: 190 / 170 kwh/m2 year To: 69 kwh/m2 year. Primary energy Savings target ~ 65% / 60% Energy budget - net energy/ space deliverable (calculated according to Norwegian Building codes) After Before Space heating 5,3 kwh/m² Mechanical ventilation - heating 5,9 kwh/m² Hot Water 5 kwh/m² Energy fans for mechanical ventilation 11,2 kwh/m² Energy pumps for heating, ventilation, cooling 1,8 kwh/m² Lighting 13,8 kwh/m² Technical equipmnet, PC, data etc. 34,5 kwh/m² Coooling, cooled beams in office areas 3,3 kwh/m² Cooling, central mechanical ventilation 6,9 kwh/m² Total netto energy demand 87,7 174 kwh/m² Energy deliverable (primary energy demand) Electricity 65 170 kwh/m² District heating 4 0 kwh/m² Heat recovery from data facility in building 15 0 kwh/m² Total primary energy demand 84 170 kwh/m² Conversion factors/ primary energy factors: Electricity 1 Heating 0,87 COP cooling 2,7 COP Heating 3

7 ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE Environmental quality plan in addition to energy Indoor Environment The Best possible indoor air quality should be assured by appropriate design that meets: Flexible technical system Low emission materials Focus on operation and maintenance Indoor thermal climate design criteria: 22 +/- 2 degree, minimum in winter Maximum 25 degrees C in summer, during business hours 8 am-4 pm On hot summer days, it is accepted that indoor temperature increases or decreases by 0.5 C per C outside increases above 25 C Indoor air quality CO 2 level not exceed 1000 ppm Lighting LUX level general lighting 300 LUX LUX level on desk / workplace 500 LUX Average daylight factor in working areas DF = 2. Water management water saving equipment, water saving toilets, nozzles and shower heads. Monitoring of water consumption Material Usage Low emission materials for a good indoor environment Use of health-and environmentally hazardous substances should be reduced to a minimum Wood materials will come from sustainable forestry Materials that represents high greenhouse gas emissions should be avoided, target for green house emission are 50% below normal building standard in Norway (Future Built objectives) Waste Management Health and environmentally hazardous substances in demolishing process has to be handled in an environmentally friendly way and in according to regulations. A minimum of 80% of the building and tearing waste should be sorted. Design should focus on efficient waste management in the operating stage. Transport Restriction of transport to and from the construction site It should be made attractive to use environmentally-friendly means of transport such as bicycles, electric cars and public transport. It should be added to facilitate video conferences Environmental monitoring in the execution phase of environment follow-up plan Environmental follow-up plan to detail targets / objectives, and to provide accountability and to milestones.

8. MORE INFORMATION RENOVATION COSTS All investments cost are based on extra investment from Norwegian standard regulation level (TEK 10), to passive house standard / energy label A. All extra cost will be subsidized with up to 60% Overview on measured used, estimated investments cost (budget), and payback time are shown in figure. Energy cost for calculating pay back time is: 0,125 Euro/ kwh Energy result: Annual consumption: Before: 170 kwh/m 2 Savings: TEK 10 level 27 kwh/m 2 TEK 10 standard building 143 kwh/m 2 Saving passive level 58 kwh/m 2 Recovery: 16 kwh/m 2 Passive house standard 69 kwh/m 2 Payback time 5 11 years Measure Describtion Amount Unit Extra Energy saving Energy saving Energy saving Payback investment saving time (budget) (budget) [Euro] [kwh/ year] [kwh/ m2 year] [euro/ year] [year] Building envelope: Walls above ground U- value improved from 0,22 in average 17.121 m 2 105.357 3,0 13.170 to 0,14 W/m2 K Cold bridges Improved from 0,12 to 0,04 W/m2 K 35.119 m 2 1.780.000 263.393 12,6 32.924 54 Roof U- value improve from 0,18 in average 4.295 m 2 130.000 31.607 0,9 3.951 33 to 0,1 W/m2 K Roof basement Roof in basement belove ground level 2.833 m 2 115.000 400.357 11,4 50.045 2 (facing ground), from 1,0 to 0,15 W/m2 K Air tight building Air tightness improve from 1,5 to 132.272 m 3 125.000 287.976 8,2 35.997 3 0,6 h -1 (n 50 value) (volume building) Passive house windows U-value improved from 1,2 i average 3.494 m 2 265.000 161.547 4,6 20.193 13 to 0,72 W/m2 K Floor facing outside U- value improved from 0,22 in average 450 m 2 70.000 3.512 0,1 439 159 above the ground to 0,13 W/m2 K Technical system and energy supply Heat recovery and Heat recovery on mechanical ventilation 245.000 m 3 /h 310.000 677.797 24,1 84.725 4 VAV mechanical vent. improved from 70% to 85% in average. SFP Specific fanpower reduced from 2,0 245.000 m 3 /h 155.000 98.333 2,8 12.292 13 to 1,5 kw/ m3/s in average Efficient lighting Efficiency of lighting system improved 35.119 m 2 840.000 277.440 7,9 34.680 12 from LENI 25 to 12,4 kwh/m2 year Energy supply System for heatrecovery from data 35.119 m 2 100.000 561.904 16,0 70.238 1 facility in basement (water based heating system not included) All measurers together 74,0 Process planing quality ensurance Extra project planning cost, quality planning etc., course 35.000 m 2 170.000 - - - - workers on site. Overall budget investments cost 4.060.000 2.869.222 74 358.653 11 Subsidized 2.400.000 Pay back time with subsidizing 1.660.000 4,6