Business Case for the New Electronic Payments Program



Similar documents
Open Payment System Request for Proposals

Creating a Strategy for an Electronic Fare Payment System SEPTA s New Payment Technologies Project

Smart Card Fare Payment Solutions For Public Transportation

An Effective Approach to Open Payment Systems

Fare collection technology should be considered in a broad context

Customer Satisfaction Survey Results

Gautrain s s Approach for an Integrated Ticketing System

Senior/T.A.P. User Guide. Get a new ID card and a new level of service.

CAPITAL PROGRAMS COMMITTEE. Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) Status Update. March 2014

Open Payment Fare Systems Save money through operational efficiencies.

SunGO Fare Payment General Information

Edward B. Pollan, P.E. LTK Engineering Services

EXPANDING PRESTO ON TTC: STATUS UPDATE

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary

Owner s Procurement Forum

White paper: EMV Payments in Transport Consult Hyperion.

The Emergence of Open Payment Fare Systems

Chicago Transit Authority Open Standards Fare System Overview. David Faust Chicago Transit Authority Senior Project Manager Chicago, IL

Open Payments and Pre-Paid Products in Transit

Metro Rail Gating Study

5. FARE RATES AND COLLECTION METHODS

Region of Waterloo Finance Department Procurement and Supply Services

Transit Payment Systems: A Case for Open Payments

Request. For. Information (RFI) Years of Service Employee Recognition Program. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit

01LG Corp. Overview. Korea Employee 125,000 Plants 40 R&D Center 70. Overseas Employees 88,000 Local subsidiaries Plants : 50 -R&D: 20

Offering you the New Age of Vending and Micro Markets The Most Technologically Advanced System in the World!

Metro Met..,.u... T,...,...,...,

A Secure and Open Solution for Seamless Transit Systems

Passenger Requirements of a Public Transport Ticketing System

Financial Systems Integration

VENTRA GROUP SALES. FAQs. What options do I have for Group Sales? Frequently Asked Questions

English. Trapeze Rail System.

DART Mobile App Go Pass

Transit and Contactless Open Payments: An Emerging Approach for Fare Collection

Transport for London. Projects and Planning Panel. The Future of London s Ticketing Technology

Euronet s Contactless Solution

Integrated Transportation Payment Systems. Boston, MA 2009-February-27

Latest anf Future Development Plans in Helsinki

Accenture Fare Management Solution. A Digital Payment Platform for Transit Operators

ITS eprimer Module 7: Public Transportation

Determination order for the introduction of Dublin Bus Leap card single operator daily and weekly capping rates October 2013

NFC, just a Payment Tool?

Accessibility Advisory Committee

ELECTRONIC FARE COLLECTION OPTIONS FOR COMMUTER RAILROADS

EMV A Gated Parking Systems Perspective PIE March 18 th 2014

Qualified Transportation Expense Benefit Plan. Featuring etrac Card Technology

Schedule 14 CDS Data Center Hosting Agreement

Recommend to Board. Final Action

WORLD BANK WORLD BANK

Open Loop in US Transportation Systems 1 / 16 White Paper

The Future Of Cloud based Ticketing. Ernst Bovelander Director Advisory Services

Shifting The Ticketing Paradigm

Taxicab Driver Sample Forms. 1. Tasks. Task 1. Task 2

Contactless Security Controls in Place to Protect Payment Card Data

We believe First Data is well positioned to take advantage of all of these trends given the breadth of our solutions and our global operating

Cubic Services Intelligent Travel... Made Real ONE TEAM... ONE POINT OF CONTACT

Merchant Services Payment Solutions for Your Business

Simple Smart Card Applications for Paratransit Systems

Power Point Presentation

Testimony of Dennis Anosike, Chief Financial Officer Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

AUTOMATED COST RECOVERY: A FEASIBILITY STUDY

Notice of Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Docket B13-01

System. Pavels Tulovskis, Technical Director June, 2009

27.ity of Johannesburg 27.2 Council

CONTACTLESS INTEROPERABILITY IN TRANSIT

Author: Trevor Day Briony Krikorian-Slade

Frequently Asked Questions

The Impact of Emerging Payment Technologies on Retail and Hospitality Businesses. National Computer Corporation

Short Term Ridership Forecasting Model (Version 3.0)

Indian Railways: Fast-Tracking to Success with Technology from SAP

FINAL AUDIT REPORT WITH RECOMMENDATIONS Internal Operations No

Shareholder Presentation

TfL s Contactless Ticketing: Oyster and Beyond Transport for London. Lauren Sager Weinstein Head of Oyster Development

Financial Management Oversight (FMO) Progress Report

RFP No General Banking, Merchant Card and Custody/Bond Trustee Services. Addendum No. 1 April 22, 2015 Questions and Answers

Warsaw City Card. Warsaw,

CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS RECEIVE AND FILE STATUS REPORT

Transcription:

Finance & Administration Committee Information Item IV-A June 9, 2011 Business Case for the New Electronic Payments Program Page 102 of 253

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information MEAD Number: Resolution: Yes No TITLE: New Electronic Payments Program PURPOSE: To provide an update to the Board of Directors on Metro`s New Electronic Payments Program (NEPP), formerly named the Open Payments Initiative. The presentation will outline the program, the steps taken to-date, the business case and outline next steps to achieve program goals. DESCRIPTION: Metro`s existing fare collection system is aging rapidly in the context of equipment and systems and it is severely limited in its flexibility to introduce new products and payments for its customers. Core to implementation of the NEPP is a complete refresh of Metro`s fare collection system software and hardware including new gates and vendors in the Metrorail system and electronic targets on-board Metrobus. Further, this new system will integrate into other mission critical business systems such as Maximo, Trapeze and Peoplesoft. Under the NEPP program, Metro will shift from an issuer of fare media to an acceptor of fare payments using a variety of International Standards Organization (ISO) approved contactless cards including new SmarTrip cards, bank-cards, Federal ID cards and the next generation of smart phones equipped with Near Field Communications (NFC) payment capability. The NEPP systems and hardware will be standards-based and utilizing standards from the financial services and smart card industries among others. Metro has initiated a two-step procurement process and concluded activities tied to Step-1. Staff plans to issue the Step-2 request for proposal documents by June 30, 2011. Page 103 of 253

FUNDING IMPACT: This presentation is for informational purposes only. In the future, the Board will be asked to approve a budget for this project. RECOMMENDATION: Presentation is for informational purposes only. Page 104 of 253

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority New Electronic Payments Program Finance and Administration Committee June 9, 2011 Page 105 of 253

Purpose Update the Board Committee on New Electronic Payments Program (NEPP) Business case review Accomplishments to-date and next steps Transit industry collaboration and leadership Development of new fare model for revenue and ridership Page 106 of 253

Program Overview Complete replacement of existing fare collection system New gates, ticket vending machines New central data system; hardware and software New contactless smart card readers on bus, rail, parking Update website and customer interfaces for new system Fully contactless smart card-based; eliminate magnetic media Page 107 of 253

Program Goals Simplify and enhance customer experience Make paying fares simple and easy Re-invest est in fare payment system Update look, touch, and feel to customer Integrate with mission critical business systems Maximo, Trapeze, and Peoplesoft Adopt new technologies within the industry Transit Agency Roundtable Increase ridership through ease of use and convenience Page 108 of 253

Today s Issues May 2011 Bus Riders Having Problems Adding Fare to SmarTrip Cards May 2011 2 Days of Glitches Stall Metro Fare Increases August 2010 CVS SmarTrip Fare Machines Facing Problems June 2009 WMATA: Miniscule i Delay is Here to Stay August 2010 Glitch Snags First Day of Higher Metro Fares June 2010 May 2011 Page 109 of 253

Today s Issues Aging g equipment and infrastructure Reliability impacts customers Customers want to move beyond magnetic tickets Invest in State of Good Repair (SOGR); estimated at $60 Million Overhaul faregates and vending machines; software updates Compact Point of Sales (CPOS) devices; communications Strained capability for expansion and innovation Adding fare products or changing structure is complex Proprietary and legacy technology Changes are expensive with long timelines Obsolete components; e.g. GoCard chips Challenging to maintain i in SOGR Page 110 of 253

Potential Benefits Improve customer service Develop more options and improved methods to pay fares Optimize annual maintenance costs, increase reliability Based fully on contactless smart cards and Near Field Communication (NFC) smart phones Eliminate magnetic stripe media Reduce annual operating costs Shift WMATA from issuer to merchant Reduce reliance on SmarTrip; transition over time Page 111 of 253

Potential Benefits Increase efficiency of processing passenger revenue Reduce potential for fare evasion Improve SOGR Overhaul or replacement of faregates and ticket vending machines overdue; FY2015-2017 Develop non-passenger revenue Loyalty programs Co-branding Mobile payment applications Page 112 of 253

Business Case: Operating Budget Current Expenses FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Maintenance 19.8 20.3 20.9 21.5 22.1 22.7 23.4 24.0 24.7 25.4 26.2 Revenue Collection 6.8 7.0 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.2 8.4 8.7 9.0 Contract Services 6.3 6.4 6.6 6.7 6.8 6.9 7.1 7.2 7.4 7.5 7.7 Parking Operations 4.3 2.2 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Debit/Credit Processing 7.8 7.9 8.1 8.3 8.4 8.6 8.8 9.0 9.1 9.3 9.5 Fare Media and Sales 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.9 4.0 Total Current Expenses $48.3 $47.3 $46.9 $48.1 $49.2 $50.5 $51.8 $53.1 $54.4 $55.8 $57.2 Forecast Savings FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Revenue Optimization 1.5 1.5 2.0 2.3 2.6 3.0 3.0 3.0 New Revenue 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Operating Savings 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 2.8 3.1 2.3 0.8 16.9 29.0 27.8 Total Forecast Savings $0.0 $0.0 $0.0 $1.6 $1.7 $15.5 $17.1 $19.4 $22.9 $35.0 $33.8 $ million Today s investment in NEPP leads to future savings over $145m through FY2021 Page 113 of 253

Business Case: Capital Program AFC Equipment Overhaul Current Program FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total NEPP Program PM 15 1.5 23 2.3 Bus Farebox Overhaul 4.2 4.2 4.2 Parking Credit Card 4.7 NextFare 5 Completion 6.6 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 PCI Compliance 1.9 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Ethernet for Faregates 1.3 Coin Collection Devices 2.3 Fare Vendor Update 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Currency Processing 06 0.6 15 1.5 08 0.8 Revenue Facility Equip 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 Programmed Total $19.6 $6.5 $6.8 $6.3 $6.2 $1.7 $1.8 $48.9 Metrorail AFC SOGR* 3.1 3.1 Metrobus AFC SOGR* 1.3 1.3 Parking SOGR* 1.1 1.1 CPOS SOGR* 1.0 1.0 Faregate/Vendor Overhaul* 2.0 14.9 14.9 14.9 Not Programmed Total $6.5 $6.5 $2.0 $14.9 $14.9 $14.9 $59.7 Total Investment $19.6 $6.5 $13.3 $12.8 $8.2 $16.6 $16.7 $14.9 $108.6 * Indicates Activity Not Programmed $ million Page 114 of 253

Business Case: Capital Program AFC Equipment Replacement Replacement Program FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 Total NEPP Program PM 15 1.5 23 2.3 Bus Farebox Overhaul 4.2 4.2 4.2 Parking Credit Card 4.7 NextFare 5 Completion 6.6 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 PCI Compliance 1.9 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 Ethernet for Faregates 1.3 Coin Collection Devices 2.3 Fare Vendor Update 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 Currency Processing 06 0.6 15 1.5 08 0.8 Revenue Facility Equip 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 Programmed Total $19.6 $5.4 $5.5 $4.7 $4.6 $0.3 $0.4 $40.5 Metrorail AFC Replacement* 7.6 23.0 23.0 23.0 Metrobus Validators* 0.8 2.2 2.2 2.2 Parking Devices* 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.3 Central Data System* 2.2 0.7 Not Programmed Total $11.0 $26.0 $26.0 $26.0 $89.0 Total Investment $19.6 $5.4 $16.5 $30.7 $30.6 $26.3 $0.4 $129.5 * Indicates Activity Not Programmed Activity Indicates Cost Avoidance Opportunity (total = $8.4m) $ million Page 115 of 253

Business Case: Opportunity Cost Lower maintenance cost New equipment warranty Extended system life Overhaul deferred to 2030 Non-proprietary architecture Page 116 of 253

Forecast Cost Savings Annual savings Page 117 of 253

Agency-wide Buy-in Strong cross-departmental coordination Executive leadership team Key representatives from all departments Operating Metrorail, Metrobus, MetroAccess, Parking Non-operating Finance, Treasury, IT, Planning, Marketing, Customer Service, Performance and Engineering Bi-weekly team conference calls Status updates, upcoming events and key milestones White papers on key issues Page 118 of 253

Accomplishments to Date Issued Step-1 of the two-step RFP process Qualifications and technical approach to 30% design Minimum market capitalization of $1 Billion in CY10 Systems integration experience; program references Received and evaluated proposals ACS, Accenture, CSC, Cubic, FIS, IBM and Revere Group Must qualify in Step-1 to engage in Step-2 Page 119 of 253

Next Steps Issued Step-1 RFP documents December 30, 2010 Conducted pre-proposal conference January 12, 2011 Received Step-1 proposals February 25, 2011 Completed Step-1 process April 29, 2011 Issue Step-2 documents June 30, 2011 Receive Step-2 proposals September 2011 Evaluation and negotiations Fall 2011 Award 1 st Quarter 2012 Proofs of concept Late Summer 2012 Testing/pilots Late Summer 2013 Phased implementation 2014-2017 Page 120 of 253

Transit Industry Leadership Transit agency roundtable discussions NYMTA, CTA, SEPTA, DART, LAMTA, UTA and WMATA Collaborative discussions Payment approaches; PAYG and PIA Risk models for payments processing Standards-based solutions and infrastructure WMATA will host next meeting - June 14, 2011 Page 121 of 253

New Revenue and Ridership Model Links new fare system with a fare model for improved fare structure analyses Supports Board of Directors fare policy guidelines adopted November 2010 Improves analytics of alternatives that adversely impact customer opinion of fares e.g. Peak-of-the-Peak Page 122 of 253

New Revenue and Ridership Model Goals Conduct market research, evaluate fare structure options Develop model to test alternative scenarios Create new model to reflect current trends and behavior Page 123 of 253

Fare Policy Issues Near Term - <6 months Assess options for enhancing SmarTrip card loading on Metrobus Examine expansion of third party sales and commissions Longer Term - <18 months Develop strategy to reduce existing magnetic media Develop strategy to reduce cash used in system Develop options for SmarTrip card pricing Page 124 of 253

New Electronic Payments Program Current State Future State Today s Metrorail fare vendor. Next generation fare vendor, payment token, trip planner and service status tool at WMATA. Customers buying fares at Union Station. Page 125 of 253