Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (double), Passenger (single)



Similar documents
Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

BMW 2 Series Active Tourer

Mercedes-Benz C-Class

AUDI A3 Sportback e-tron

Driver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)

Skoda Octavia 66% 82% ADULT OCCUPANT. Total 34 pts 93% Skoda Octavia 1.6 'Ambition', LHD SIDE IMPACT REAR IMPACT (WHIPLASH) 2,6 pts WHIPLASH

Suzuki Vitara SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION

Mazda CX-3 79% 85% 84% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

Mazda MX-5 84% 80% 64% 93% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.

FORD FIGO (NO AIRBAGS)

Make the right choice. Vehicle safety advice for older drivers

NEW CAR SAFETY INNOVATIONS ANCAP RATINGS. Michael Paine - ANCAP Technical Manager

Existing safety technology is the driverless vehicle already here? Matthew Avery Safety Research Director

CRASH TESTS TO ASSESS THE SECONDARY SAFETY OF A LARGE MPV

EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) FILM & PHOTO PROTOCOL

Safety performance comparisons of different types of child seats in high speed impact tests

20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam

NCAP New Car Assessment Programme

European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles

Factors related to serious injury in post ncap european cars involved in frontal crashes


CASPER CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS. Car Technology. SPEAKER: Britta Schnottale BASt. CASPER and EPOCh Final Workshop 13 th -15

LATIN AMERICAN & CARRIBEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Latin NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION 2016

The SIPS (Side Impact Protection System) includes side and Inflatable Curtain (IC) airbags that protect both front and rear occupants.

Supplementary restraints system

Balancing Active and Passive Safety

RCAR Low-speed structural crash test protocol

Sources of data. IIHS MDB (SUV) Side Impact Test at 50km/h (from 2003) NHTSA Crabbed MDB Side Impact Test at 62 km/h (from 1997)

Motor Vehicle Collision Form

UNDERSTANDING YOUR VEHICLE S. What every driver and passenger should know

A name a commitment! These are the criteria which have characterized the development of dependable everyday cars up to the present time.

Vehicle Safety Systems

Collision Avoidance. The car we couldn t crash! The future for drivers. Compare the technologies. research news

Contents. 1. What types of car restraints are available? Buying a car child seat- checklist Tips for fitting car seats 6

Field Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews

REARWARD- & FORWARD-FACING USER MANUAL ECE R GROUP WEIGHT AGE 0+/ kg 6m-4y

MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION/PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE

MOTOR VEHICLE COLLISION/PERSONAL INJURY QUESTIONNAIRE

Accidents with Pedestrians and Cyclists in Germany Findings and Measures

Pedestrian protection - Pedestrian in collision with personal car

SEAT BELTS AND AIRBAGS

Automotive Collision Injury Form

Assessment of Whiplash Protection in Rear Impacts. Crash Tests and Real-life Crashes

Child Safety in Cars. Federal Highway Research Institute

#stopthecrash AUTONOMOUS EMERGENCY BRAKING THE NEXT SEAT BELT?

Adaptive cruise control (ACC)

Paper Number Paine, Page 1

The Increasing Role of SUVs in Crash Involvement in Germany

Child in Car Safety Leaflet 1/8/07 8:54 am Page 1 Child In Car Safety

Auto Accident Description

Virginia's Child Passenger Safety Laws

climate unit for the passenger compartment.

No.2 October Automotive insight for Members. Stop the Crash! AEB prevents low speed crashes: now part of UK group rating

PASSIVE SAFETY SYSTEMS

Quantifying the risk of the connected and autonomous vehicle

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Volvo Trucks view on Truck Rollover Accidents

VAUXHALL Insignia. Owner s Manual Model Year Edition: January 2009 TS 1674-B-09

PRODUCT SAFETY. Volkswagen Passenger Cars

Injury Prevention & Crash Dynamics

The New Car Assessment Program Suggested Approaches for Future Program Enhancements

This owner s manual should be considered a permanent part of the vehicle and should remain with the vehicle when it is sold.

research Key Technologies for Preventing Crashes SPECIAL EDITION 10/NO.2 INSIDE: Youth Key P4 / Alco-locks P6 / Protecting Pedestrians P10

BILLING INFORMATION. Address: City, State, Zip: Telephone Number: Date of Injury: Time of Injury: AM PM City and street where crash occurred:

*Date of injury/auto Accident/Slip and fall: / / Time: : AM PM

Commentary Drive Assessment

Airbags and Pretensioners. Emergency Response Guide

EMERGENCY SERVICES. Component Location and Safety Document. X-TYPE my Onwards

Talking Points. About Roadway Users

CHILD BOOSTER SEAT. Instructions for Installation & Use Series No. 4050/A/2013 IMPORTANT: KEEP THIS BOOK IN THE PLACE PROVIDED ON THE CHILD RESTRAINT

Editor Dan Wargclou. Extrication from Cars during Road Traffic Accidents

PRIORITIES FOR EU MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY DESIGN

Improving Driving Safety Through Automation

Long-term medical consequences to children injured in car crashes and influence of crash directions

Child Car Restraints

2014 Annual General Meeting

2006 Cadillac STS/STS-V Owner Manual M

OPEL ASTRA. Owner's Manual

Mercedes-Benz Vito. Specifications

Red Oak Fire Rescue SECTION: New Car Technology

Trailblazer, Envoy, Rainier, Ascender

VEHICLE EQUIPMENT INSTRUCTIONS

Best Practice Guide Vehicle Ergonomics Best Practice Guide

Product Overview. Restraint systems. Flooring systems. Seating systems. Solar systems

SAFETY ACTIVITIES Technology Overview NISSAN S APPROACH TO SAFETY

Event Data Recorder - Reference Document

Vehicle Safety. Vehicle Safety web text. Please refer to this document as: SafetyNet (2009) Vehicle Safety, retrieved <add date of retrieval here>

SEAT BELT Installation Manual

Vehicle Accident Information Form

Presented by the expert of France 55th Session of the UN ECE Working Party on Passive Safety GRSP May 2014 Agenda Items 15

Transcription:

Nissan X Trail Nissan X Trail 1.6 diesel Acenta, LHD 86% 83% 75% 75% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Nissan X Trail 1.6 diesel Acenta, LHD Body type 5 door SUV Year of publication 2014 Kerb weight 1645kg VIN from which rating applies applies to all X Trails of the specification tested SAFETY EQUIPMENT Frontal airbags Pre-tensioners Load-limiters Knee airbags Side airbags Front head restraints enger airbag switch ISOFIX anchorages Integrated child restraint Active Pedestrian Protection Seatbelt Reminder Electronic Stability Control Speed Assistance Systems Lane Support Autonomous Braking Other Driver (Single Stage), enger (Single Stage) Driver (double), enger (single) Driver, enger None Head (front and rear), Thorax (front only) (combined thorax/pelvis) ive Manual switch Rear outboard seats None None, Driver, enger, Rear ESP, Standard, Manual Switch Driver-set speed limitation, Not Available Lane Departure Warning, Forward Emergency Braking, Inter-Urban (Auto-Brake) system, Safety equipment is standard across the model range unless stated otherwise

ADULT OCCUPANT Total 33 pts 86% CRASH TEST PERFORMANCE FRONT OFFSET Driver SIDE CAR SIDE POLE 14,7 pts enger 8 pts 7,9 pts FRONT OFFSET HEAD Driver airbag contact enger airbag contact CHEST enger compartment Windscreen Pillar rearward Steering wheel rearward Steering wheel upward Chest contact with steering wheel 13mm 16mm UPPER LEGS, KNEES AND PELVIS Stiff structures in dashboard Concentrated loads on knees LOWER LEGS AND FEET Footwell Collapse Rearward pedal movement Upward pedal movement Clutch - 59mm Clutch - 15mm SIDE Side car Side pole Head protection airbag Chest protection airbag Yes Yes WHIPLASH PROTECTION FRONT, REAR SEATS 2,1 pts HEAD RESTRAINT Front seats Rear seats Seat description Standard clolth, 6 way manual Head restraint type ive Front geometric assessment 1,5 pts TESTS - High severity 2,5 pts - Medium severity 2,7 pts - Low severity 2,4 pts AEB CITY 0 pts System name Fitment Optional (not meeting fitment requirements) GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POOR

CHILD OCCUPANT Total 41 pts 83% CRASH TEST PERFORMANCE 18 MONTH OLD CHILD FRONTAL IMPACT Restraint Facing Installation Römer BabySafe + ISOFIX Base rearward facing ISOFIX and Supportleg Head forward movement Chest load PERFORMANCE 12 pts SIDE IMPACT Head containment 3 YEAR OLD CHILD FRONTAL IMPACT Restraint Facing Installation Römer Duo Plus forward facing ISOFIX and TopTether Head forward movement Chest load PERFORMANCE 10,7 pts SIDE IMPACT Head containment CHILD SAFETY FEATURES AND CRS INSTALLATION CHECK Isofix Safety features score Installation check score 6 pts 12 pts Partial Fail Fail Exempt Install without problem Install with care Safety critical problem Installation not allowed SEAT POSITION FRONT 2nd ROW 3rd ROW CENTER RIGHT LEFT CENTER RIGHT LEFT CENTER RIGHT Maxi Cosi Cabriofix (Seatbelt) Römer King Plus (Seatbelt) Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) Römer KidFix (Seatbelt) Maxi Cosi Cabriofix and EasyFix (Seatbelt) Maxi Cosi Cabriofix and EasyFix (ISOFIX) BeSafe izi Kid X3 ISOfix (ISOFIX) Maxi Cosi Pearl and Familyfix (ISOFIX) Römer KidFix (ISOFIX) Römer BabySafe + ISOFIX Base (ISOFIX) Römer Duo Plus (ISOFIX) N/A Exempt Exempt N/A Exempt N/A Exempt Exempt N/A Exempt N/A Exempt Exempt N/A Exempt N/A Exempt Exempt N/A Exempt

SAFETY ASSIST Total 10 pts 75% 1,7 pts SPEED ASSISTANCE SYSTEM Not Available Speed Information PASS Speed Assistance (Manual) - driver and passenger - rear LANE SUPPORT SYSTEMS 1 pts ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL (ESC) 3 pts - ESP Lane Departure Warning Meets requirements Meets requirements Crash avoided 1,6 pts AEB INTERURBAN SYSTEMS 2,6 pts SEATBELT REMINDER Forward Emergency Braking Human machine interface Default On Speed reduced No crash mitigation Performance APPROACHING A STATIONARY VEHICLE Approaching speed (km/h) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 40 50 60 70 80 APPROACHING A SLOW MOVING VEHICLE Approaching speed (km/h) 10 20 30 APPROACHING A BRAKING VEHICLE WITH SHORT HEADWAY Leading vehicle braking Gentle (2 m/s²) Abrupt (6m/s²) APPROACHING A BRAKING VEHICLE WITH LONG HEADWAY Leading vehicle braking Gentle (2 m/s²) Abrupt (6m/s²)

PEDESTRIAN Total 27 pts 75% HEAD PELVIS LEG 15,4 pts 5,8 pts 6 pts GOOD ADEQUATE MARGINAL WEAK POOR COMMENTS Adult occupant The passenger compartment remained in the frontal impact. Dummy readings indicated protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. Nissan showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different size and to those sat in different positions. In the side barrier test, the X Trial scored maximum points, with protection of all body areas. Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of all body regions was, except that of the chest which was adequate. The front seats and head restraints provided protection against whiplash injury in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal protection. An autonomous emergency braking system is available on the X Trail, which would help to avoid or mitigate rear-end accidents, further reducing the risk of whiplash injury. However, as the system is not standard equipment, it was not included in the assessment. Child occupant Based on dummy readings in the dynamic tests, the X Trail scored maximum points for its protection of the 1½ year dummy. In the frontal impact, forward movement of the 3 year dummy, sat in a forward-facing restraint, was not excessive although neck tension was marginally high. In the side impact, both dummies were properly contained by the protective shells of their restraints, minimising the risk of head contact with parts of the vehicle interior. The passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the restraints for which the X Trail is designed could be properly installed and accommodated. Pedestrian The X Trail scored maximum points for the protection its bumper offered to pedestrians' legs, with results recorded at all test locations. The front edge of the bonnet offered or adequate protection. The bonnet surface provided protection that was adequate in almost all areas tested with some poor results only on the stiff windscreen pillars. Safety assist Electronic stability control is standard equipment on all X Trails. A seatbelt reminder is standard for the front and second-row rear seats but not for the optional third row seats. A camera-based system recognises speed limit signs and can display the information to the driver who can then choose whether or not to set the speed-limiter accordingly. The system met Euro NCAP's requirements for systems of this type and was rewarded. The X Trail has an autonomous emergency braking system as an option. It is expected to be fitted to most cars sold so the system was assessed and rewarded for its performance. A lane departure warning system is also an option which is expected to be on most vehicles and which met Euro NCAP's requirements.