NCAP New Car Assessment Programme
|
|
- Duane McKinney
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 New Car Assessment Programme Harald Zellmer Autoliv B.V. & Co. KG, Elmshorn, Germany International Course on Transportation Planning and Safety New Delhi December 2010 PRIVATE/PROPRIETARY : New Car Assessment Programme Introduction US Euro Japan China AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
2 : New Car Assessment Programme Introduction US Euro Japan China AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Fatalities of Car Occupants USA USA: Annual average of fatal occupant injuries Accident Type Frontal Impact Side Impact Rear Impact Rollover Other Total Percentage No. Casualties Source: Donald Friedman, Carl E. Nash, Justin Caplinger: RESULTS FROM TWO SIDED QUASI- STATIC (M216) AND REPEATABLE DYNAMIC ROLLOVER TESTS (JRS) RELATIVE TO FMVSS 216 TESTS, 2007 ESV Conference, Paper Number AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
3 History of US NHTSA established in response to Title II of the Motor Vehicle Information and Cost Savings Act of Its goal is to improve occupant protection by providing consumers with a measure of the relative safety of passenger vehicles to aid consumers in their purchasing decisions. The agency established a frontal impact test program whose protocol is based on Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208 Occupant Crash Protection except that the frontal test is conducted at 56 km/h (35 mi/h), rather than 48 km/h (30 mi/h) as required by FMVSS No Model year (MY) 1979 vehicles were the first tested and rated using this protocol. The five-star rating system was first used for MY 1994 vehicles. AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi History of US The agency began testing and rating vehicles for side impact protection in the 1997 MY. As with the frontal program, the test protocol was based on an existing Federal standard, FMVSS No. 214 Side Impact Protection, and again the test speed was increased by 8 km/h (5 mi/h). Starting with the 2001 MY, the agency began using to rate vehicles for rollover resistance based on a static measurement of a vehicle s track width and the height of its center of gravity. Beginning with the 2004 MY, rollover resistance ratings have been based on both the static measurements of a vehicle and the results of a dynamic test (fishhook test). AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
4 History of US In June 2008 the agency announced major changes to the program starting from MY 2011 vehicles: - The rating in frontal impact is changed, - A pole side impact is introduced, - A new overall Vehicle Safety Score will combine the star ratings from the front, side, and rollover programs. Additional text will be added to the Star-Rating to inform consumers of the availability (optional or standard equipment) of three crash avoidance technologies: - ESC (Electronic Stability Control) - FCW (Forward Collision Warning) - LDW (Lane Departure Warning) AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Frontal Impact FMVSS Dummys H-III 50% belted and unbelted 2 Dummys H-III 5% belted and unbelted Belted loadcases full frontal barrier 0-30 at 56 km/h Unbelted loadcases full frontal barrier 0-30 or Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB) with reduces impact velocity AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
5 Frontal Impact FMVSS 208 Dummy Criteria HIC15 < 700 (700) NIJ < 1,0 Thorax: a 3ms < 60g, Defl. < 63 mm (52 mm) Femurs axial < 10,2 kn (< 6,8 kn) no "Submarining Figures put in parentheses are for H-III 5% Dummy AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi US until Model Year 2009 HIC Legal limits Like FMVSS mph = 56 km/h Driver HIII-50% Passenger HIII-50% belted Star rating ***** **** *** ** * CHEST ACCELERATION [g] AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
6 US Changes for Model Year 2011 Combined Rating = (5/12)*RRS(front) + (4/12)*RRS(side) + (3/12)*RRS(roll) AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi US Changes for Model Year 2011 Head Neck 20% 20% Risk curves for 50th percentile male Probability of AIS3 Injury Probability of AIS3 Injury 15% 10% 5% 0% HIC (15) Chest 20% 15% 10% 5% Probability of AIS3 Injury Probability of AIS2 Injury 15% 10% 5% 0% 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1 Nij Femur 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% % Chest deflection [mm] Femur Force [kn] AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
7 US Changes for Model Year 2011 Combining Injury Risk from Different Body Regions The joint probability of injury to an occupant is obtained by combining the risk of injury to each body region assuming the injury to different body regions are independent events. Therefore, the probability of serious injury, P joint for both AM50 (50 th %) and AF05 (5 th %) is given by: P joint = 1 (1 P head ) x (1 P neck ) x (1 P chest ) x (1 P femur ) For Pjoint < 20 %: Pjoint ~ Phead + Pneck + Pchest + Pfemur Error Pjoint=20% < 8% from total, i.e. 1.5 points Error Pjoint=10% < 4% from total, i.e. 0.4 points AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi US Changes for Model Year 2011 Combined Rating = (5/12)*RRS(front) + (4/12)*RRS(side) + (3/12)*RRS(roll) AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
8 US Changes for Model Year 2011 AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi US Changes for Model Year 2011 AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
9 Side impact FMVSS Loadcases: Crab barrier, 54 km/h (= 48 km/h relative speed) 2 dummies EuroSID 2 Car-to-pole impact, 32 km/h, 1 dummy SID IIs AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi US Changes for Model Year 2011 Increased speed compared to FMVSS km/h AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
10 US Changes for Model Year 2011 Static and dynamic requirement (fishhook test) AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi US Changes for Model Year 2011 Source: AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
11 US Changes for Model Year 2011 fishhook test Source: AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi US Changes for Model Year 2011 Source: AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
12 US Changes for Model Year 2011 The information is based on data from all vehicles tested under NHTSA s rollover resistance ratings system (Static Stability Factor only). For example, the passenger cars that were tested have 4- or 5-star ratings, and an average chance of rollover of approximately 12% if involved in a single-vehicle crash. The range for passenger cars is approximately 6% to 19%. Source: AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi US Changes for Model Year 2011 Combined Crashworthiness Rating The combined Vehicle Safety Score (VSS), is the weighted average of the Relative Risk Scores (RSS) in front, side and Rollover Crashes. The Vehicle Safety Score for the Combined Crashworthiness Rating is: Combined Rating = (5/12)*RRS(front) + (4/12)*RRS(side) + (3/12)*RRS(roll) 5 Stars 4 Stars 3 Stars 2 Stars 1 Star VSS VSS< VSS< VSS< VSS<2.67 VSS 2.67 Probability P< P< P< P<0.40 P 0.4 AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
13 : New Car Assessment Programme Introduction US Euro Japan China AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Fatalities on the Road in EU15 AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
14 Euro Euro claims that it provides motoring consumers with a realistic and independent assessment of the safety performance of some of the most popular cars sold in Europe. Established in 1997 and now backed by seven European Governments, the European Commission and motoring and consumer organisations in every EU country, Euro has become a catalyst for encouraging significant safety improvements to new car design. For more information: AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Euro Phase in from 2009 Four Assessment Areas: Occupant Safety Child Occupant Safety Pedestrian Safety Safety Assist Occupant Safety consists of: ECE-R94 Deformable Barrier 64 km/h! ECE-R 95 Side Impact Side Pole Impact Low Speed Rear Impact AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
15 Frontal Impact ECE-R 94 2 Dummys H-III, 50% belted Offset Deformable Barrier (ODB), 40% overlap Impact velocity 56 km/h AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Frontal Impact ECE-R 94 Represents Car-to-Car Crash with a collission speed of each 50 km/h and 50 % overlap AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
16 Frontal Impact ECE-R 94 AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Euro Frontal Impact Impact speed raised to 64 km/h compaired to 56 km/h in ECE-R 94 Occupant rating by body part scores for head neck chest lower extremities each max. 4 points Source: Euro AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
17 3.3 Consumer Tests Euro Frontal Impact Injury score rating Body part scores are displayed as shown here When there are more than one criteria for the body part the lowest value (in points) is used ODB test Body region Criteria Unit Good +4 pts Adequate +3 pts Marginal +2 pts Poor +1 pts Weak 0 pts Head HIC > > > >1000 A(3ms) [g] 72 >72-77 >77-82 >82-88 >88 Neck Shear* [kn] 1,9 >1,9-2,3 >2,3-2,7 >2,7-3,1 >3,1 Tension* [kn] 2,7 >2,7-2,9 >2,9-3,1 >3,1-3,3 >3,3 Extension [Nm] 42 >42-47 >47-52 >52-57 >57 Chest Deflection [mm] 22 >22-31 >31-41 >41-50 >50 VC [m/s] 0,5 >0,5-0,67 >0, >0,84-1,0 >1,0 Upper leg & Compr.* [kn] 3,8 >3,8-5,05 >5,05-6,3 >6,3-7,56 >7,56 Knee Deflection [mm] 6 >6-9 >9-12 >12-15 >15 Lower leg Index 0.4 >0.4-0,7 >0,7-1,0 >1,0-1,3 >1,3 Compr. [kn] 2 >2-4 >4-6 >6-8 >8 Foot/Ankle PSCS [mm] 100 > > > >200 * Time based limits, only one value shown here. See test protocol for details AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Euro AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
18 Euro Phase in from 2009 Side Impact Source: Euro AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Euro Phase in from 2009 Low Speed Rear Impact Dummy: BioRID version G Pulses: Dv 16 km/h 4.5g mean trapetzoid Dv 16 km/h 5.5g mean triangular Dv 24 km/h 6.5g mean trapetzoid Whiplash assessment criteria: NIC max, N km, Head Rebound, Time to head restraint contact Fx and Fz upper neck, T1g Seat Stability Geometry assessment AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
19 Euro Phase in from 2009 Child Occupant Protection Source: In the frontal and side impact barrier tests, dummies representing 1½ and 3 year old children are placed in the rear of the car in the type of child restraint, recommended by the car manufacturer. AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Euro Phase in from 2009 Pedestrian Protection Source: Euro A series of tests are carried out to replicate accidents involving child and adult pedestrians where impacts occur at 40kph (25mph). Impact sites are then assessed and rated fair, weak and poor. As with other tests, these are based on European Enhanced Vehicle-safety Committee guidelines AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
20 Euro Phase in from 2009 Safety Assist Additional score for: - Seat belt reminders - Electronic stability control (ESC) - Speed limitation device AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Euro Phase in from 2009 > 80% > 70% > 60% > 55% > 45% < 45% Pedestrian Protection Lower values in introduction phase 2009/10 AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
21 VW Golf, Euro the first new Changes 5-star car even in 2012! Total Rating = 84% Tested in October % 84% 61% 71% *) AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi VW Golf, Euro the first new Changes 5-star car Adult Occupant Protection 97% 8.0 pts 7.7 pts 34.7 from 36 Pedestrian protection 61% Safety Assist 71% 21.9 from 36 5 from 7 AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
22 All star cars Total 84% % % % % % % Honda CR-Z 85% Suzuki Swift 83% AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Status Recent & Upcoming Euro Changes Box 1 (Adult Occupant Protection) Reimplement capping in pole impact New positioning procedure for pole impact Working group established to review the occupant protection assessment, report excpected end of 2012 Box 2 (Child Occupant Protection) Child seats for 1.5 & 3 year old children to be rated separately based on sled test results Q6 dummy / 5 % HIII(?) dummy in the frontal test Q6 dummy / WorldSID 5% dummy in the side test Implementation probably not before 2014 Box 3 (Pedestrian Protection) Moderate changes to the protocol Tests to be done outside bumper corners Child headform weight increased to 3.5 kg Child headform impact area WAD 1700 mm Box 4 (Safety Assist) ESC might be removed due to becoming mandatory in EU Reward system for new and emerging safety technologies implemented in 2010 AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Status November
23 : New Car Assessment Programme Introduction US Euro Frontal Impact Comparison Japan China AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi US/Euro Comparison frontal impact requirements US 56 km/h rigid full overlap barrier Dummy HIII 50% male driver side Dummy HIII 5% female passenger side Euro 64 km/h offset deformable barrier 2 Dummys HIII 50% injury rating by injury risk injury rating by body region HIC(15) Head HIC Nij, tension/ Neck shear, tension/ compression extension deflection Chest deflection force Femur force % Tibia tibia index injury limits in red are difficult to achieve frontal counts 42% in total rating frontal counts 22% in total rating AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
24 : New Car Assessment Programme Introduction US Euro Japan China AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Japan Combination of US and Euro Frontal 55 km/h Frontal 64 km/h Side 55 km/h AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
25 Japan Frontal Impact Target Figures AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Japan AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
26 Japan Detailed data on cars tested available in the internet, follow the link at the end of this presentation AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Japan Recent Changes: Rear Seat Occupant Protection AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
27 Presented at ESV-Conference 2009 Abstract In June of 2008, it became mandatory in Japan for rear seat occupants to wear a seat belt under the new Road Traffic Act. Rear seat occupants involved in frontal collision traffic accidents in Japan are mainly women. Considering this situation, we will start to evaluate rear seat occupant safety performance in frontal collision tests using a Hybrid III AF05 dummy. The evaluation includes not only this dynamic collision test but also the usability of the rear seatbelt and seatbelt reminder for passengers including those in the rear seat, which is not mandated by the law. We will show in detail the methods for rear occupant protection in a frontal collision and the ease of use of rear seatbelt, which will be the first introduction worldwide by Japan. AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi With the Road Traffic Act revision of 2008, making rear seatbelts mandatory, the rate has begun to improve (road: 8.8% 30.8%; Expressway:13.5% 62.5%; see Figs. 2 and 3). Under these circumstances, the safety assessment for rear occupants with seat belts now has increasing significance. AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
28 The report of Traffic Accident Case Study in 2007 by the Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis (ITARDA) provided an accident analysis of rear seat occupants belted in by a 3-point seat belt in Japan. It showed that frontal collisions caused the highest number of fatal or serious injuries for both car-to-car accidents (see Fig. 4) and single vehicle accidents (see Fig. 5). AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Japan decided to use the offset frontal collision test for rear occupant protection performance evaluation although car accelerations in full wrap collisions are higher. The front passenger dummy is removed as it could be a problem to install three dummies in a small car. As women have a high rate of occupancy in rear seats, it was decided to use the Hybrid III AF05 Dummy. AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
29 Referring to FMVSS 208 and the new US, the injury evaluation criteria were established. Dummy parts for evaluation include the head, neck, chest, abdomen and lower limbs. E.g. the target value for chest deflection is 23 mm (cf. Fig. 9), 48 mm would be the lower boundary. AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Points from table are weighted 12/15 Level 1: 0~6 Level 2: 6~7.5 Level 3: 7.5~9 Level 4: 9~10.5 Level 5: 10.5~12 AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
30 To evaluate usability the following is taken into account: 1. Accessibility of seat belt 2. Insertability of tongue into buckle 3. Identification of buckle 4. Wearing comfort AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Japan Rear Seat Results on 15 cars now available 13 cars rated 3 points, two cars received 4 points (out of 5) To be included in total rating in 2011 Results available in English: AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
31 : New Car Assessment Programme Introduction US Euro Japan China AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi China Modified Japan, reduced speed, rear seat occupants Full wrap ODB Frontal 50 km/h Frontal 56 km/h Side 50 km/h AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
32 China Assessment Procedure Crash testing Full wrap frontal collision ODB frontal collision Side MDB collision test Individual test evaluation Points for injury values and modifier Overall points for driver (and passenger) Points for injury values and modifier Overall points for driver (and passenger) Points for injury values and modifier Overall points for driver Additional score Seat belt reminder SAB and IC fitment Overall collision safety performance evaluation Star rating for driver and passenger Applicable vehicle type: passenger cars (include MPV, SUV & exclude mini-van) AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi China Assessment Procedure Before 2010 Additional Score (Total: 3) Seat Belt Reminder 1 Point: Driver safety belt reminder Audible signal shall be actuated in case of at least one of the following conditions: 1. Vehicle has already traveled forward for 60s 2. Vehicle has already traveled 500m forward 3. The forward velocity of vehicle has already exceeded 25km/h 1 Point: Passenger safety belt reminder No particular requirement for the type of signal Monitoring of seat occupation (else 0,5 points for reminder) Side Airbag & Curtain Airbag 1 Point: If side airbag & curtain airbag can deploy correctly in the side impact test Overall Collision Safety Performance Evaluation (Full Score:51) Remarks: No performance assessment for rear dummies AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
33 China Assessment Procedure from 2010 Add a 3 years old P3 child dummy on the second row. Additional Score (Total: 3) Seat Belt Reminder Change from max. 2 points to max. 1.5 point (0.5 point for driver side and 1 point for passenger side) Side Airbag & Curtain Airbag 1 Point: If side airbag & curtain airbag can deploy correctly in the side impact test ISOFIX Devices 0.5 point if car has two ISOFIXs at least & one of ISOFIX is at second row, ISOFIX at second row doesn t lose function during full-wrap frontal collision test. Overall Collision Safety Performance Evaluation (Full Score:51) Add one belted SIDII-S (D) dummy at second row seat of impacted side Publication of Fuel Consumption Test Result Fuel consumption test results to all of China test cars as China fuel consumption test procedure is published. Remarks: No performance assessment to rear dummies. But if seat belts or ISOFIX for rear dummies fail during tests, the car will have modifier. AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi China Second Revision 2012/ 13 ODB test speed increased to 64 km/h Injury assessment for rear seat dummy Total score 9 points Whiplash protection test Total score is 7 points Pedestrian protection test As an optional test, result not added to whole vehicle rating system Child restraint seat test Individual assessment to the performance of child seat Active safety systems Similar to new Euro AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
34 : New Car Assessment Programme Introduction US Euro Japan China AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi Useful Links Other Ratings AUTOLIV / Dr. H. Zellmer / New Delhi
Mazda CX-3 79% 85% 84% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Mazda CX-3 Supermini 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 85% 79% Pedestrian Safety Assist 84% 64% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Mazda CX-3 2.0 'Core', LHD 5 door wagon Year Of Publication 2015 Kerb
More informationSuzuki Vitara SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Year Of Publication 2015. Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Suzuki Vitara Supermini Adult Occupant Child Occupant Pedestrian Safety Assist SPECIFICATION Tested Model Suzuki Vitara 1.6 GL+, LHD Body Type 5 door hatchback Year Of Publication 2015 Kerb Weight 1114kg
More informationDriver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (double), Passenger (single)
Nissan X Trail Nissan X Trail 1.6 diesel Acenta, LHD 86% 83% 75% 75% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Nissan X Trail 1.6 diesel Acenta, LHD Body type 5 door SUV Year of publication 2014
More informationMazda MX-5 84% 80% 64% 93% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Mazda MX-5 Roadster Sport 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 84% 80% Pedestrian Safety Assist 93% 64% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Mazda MX-5 1.5 SE-L, RHD 2 door roadster Year Of Publication 2015
More informationMercedes-Benz C-Class
Mercedes-Benz C-Class Mercedes-Benz C-Class C220 'Avantgarde', LHD 92% 84% 77% 70% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Mercedes-Benz C-Class C220 'Avantgarde', LHD Body type 4 door sedan
More informationDriver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)
Skoda Fabia Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 'Ambition', LHD 81% 81% 69% 69% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Skoda Fabia 1.2 TSI 'Ambition', LHD Body type 5 door hatchback Year of publication 2014
More informationDriver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)
Citroen C1 Tested Model: Toyota Aygo 1 x-play, LHD 80% 80% 62% 56% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Tested Model: Toyota Aygo 1 x-play, LHD Body type 5 door hatchback Year of publication
More informationBMW 2 Series Active Tourer
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer BMW 2 Series Active Tourer 1.5 Base, LHD 84% 85% 60% 70% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model BMW 2 Series Active Tourer 1.5 Base, LHD Body type 5 door hatchback
More informationDriver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)
Hyundai i10 Hyundai i10 1.0 petrol Comfort, LHD 79% 80% 71% 56% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Hyundai i10 1.0 petrol Comfort, LHD Body type 5 door hatchback Year of publication 2014
More informationAUDI A3 Sportback e-tron
AUDI A3 Sportback e-tron AUDI A3 Sportback e-tron 1.4 TFSI + e-engine 'Ambition', RHD 82% 78% 66% 68% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model AUDI A3 Sportback e-tron 1.4 TFSI + e-engine 'Ambition',
More informationNEW CAR SAFETY INNOVATIONS ANCAP RATINGS. Michael Paine - ANCAP Technical Manager
NEW CAR SAFETY INNOVATIONS ANCAP RATINGS Michael Paine - ANCAP Technical Manager Outline Background on crash testing by ANCAP Improvements in vehicle occupant protection Technologies to avoid serious crashes
More informationSkoda Octavia 66% 82% ADULT OCCUPANT. Total 34 pts 93% Skoda Octavia 1.6 'Ambition', LHD SIDE IMPACT REAR IMPACT (WHIPLASH) 2,6 pts WHIPLASH
Skoda Octavia Skoda Octavia 1.6 'Ambition', LHD 93% 86% 82% 66% ADULT OCCUPANT Total 34 pts 93% 15,9 pts HEAD Driver airbag contact Passenger airbag contact CHEST Driver Passenger CAR 8 pts POLE 6,4 pts
More informationThe New Car Assessment Program Suggested Approaches for Future Program Enhancements
DOT HS 810 698 January 2007 The New Car Assessment Program Suggested Approaches for Future Program Enhancements National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Department of Transportation 2 Table of Contents
More informationCOMPARISON OF BIORID INJURY CRITERIA BETWEEN DYNAMIC SLED TESTS AND VEHICLE CRASH TESTS
COMPARISON OF BIORID INJURY CRITERIA BETWEEN DYNAMIC SLED TESTS AND VEHICLE CRASH TESTS David A. Aylor David S. Zuby Insurance Institute for Highway Safety United States Paper No. 11-235 ABSTRACT The Insurance
More informationSafety performance comparisons of different types of child seats in high speed impact tests
Safety performance comparisons of different types of child seats in high speed impact tests Jia Hu Dazhi Wang Michael Mellor Guoqiang Chen Dayong Wang Zheng Li Yongguang Wang Xing Su Jianyong Ma Xiaodong
More informationEuropean New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles
European New Car Assessment Program (EuroNCAP) and Crash Test Ratings of New Vehicles Car safety is now an important issue that many people consider when buying a new car. There are crash test standards
More informationAssessment of Whiplash Protection in Rear Impacts. Crash Tests and Real-life Crashes
Assessment of Whiplash Protection in Rear Impacts Crash Tests and Real-life Crashes Maria Krafft, Anders Kullgren Folksam Anders Lie, Claes Tingvall Swedish National Road Administration June 24 Summary
More informationSources of data. IIHS MDB (SUV) Side Impact Test at 50km/h (from 2003) NHTSA Crabbed MDB Side Impact Test at 62 km/h (from 1997)
SIDE IMPACTS AND IMPROVED OCCUPANT PROTECTION Chris Coxon Department of Transport & Urban Planning, South Australia Michael Paine Vehicle Design & Research Jack Haley NRMA Motoring and Services, Australia
More informationField Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews
Field Accident Data Analysis of 2 nd Row Children and Individual Case Reviews David C Viano, Chantal S Parenteau ProBiomechanics LLC SAE 2008-01 01-18511851 CSS 38% U 50% Front 45% Background Children
More informationLATIN AMERICAN & CARRIBEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Latin NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION 2016
LATIN AMERICAN & CARRIBEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Latin NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION 2016 Version 3.0 AKNOWLEDGEMENT Copyright Latin NCAP 2014 - This work is the intellectual
More informationVolvo Trucks view on Truck Rollover Accidents
Volvo Trucks view on Truck Rollover Accidents Mario Ligovic, Volvo Truck Corporation, Göteborg, Sweden INTRODUCTION Rollover is the most common heavy truck accident type. Experiencing a rollover is like
More informationPresented by the expert of France 55th Session of the UN ECE Working Party on Passive Safety GRSP 19-23 May 2014 Agenda Items 15
Informal document GRSP 55 39 (55th GRSP, 19 23 May 2013, agenda items 15 & 18) Presented by the expert of France 55th Session of the UN ECE Working Party on Passive Safety GRSP 19-23 May 2014 Agenda Items
More informationCASPER CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS. Car Technology. SPEAKER: Britta Schnottale BASt. CASPER and EPOCh Final Workshop 13 th -15
CHILD ADVANCED SAFETY PROJECT FOR EUROPEAN ROADS BASt and EPOCh Final Workshop 13 th -15 th March 2012 Berlin, Germany Content Introduction Accident data ISOFix Safety devices - Pre-tensioner and Load
More informationFactors related to serious injury in post ncap european cars involved in frontal crashes
Loughborough University Institutional Repository Factors related to serious injury in post ncap european cars involved in frontal crashes This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional
More informationMake the right choice. Vehicle safety advice for older drivers
Make the right choice Vehicle safety advice for older drivers Why is it important to buy a safe car? Older drivers are the most likely of all driver age groups to sustain serious or life threatening injuries
More informationUPDATED REVIEW OF POTENTIAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR FMVSS NO. 208
UPDATED REVIEW OF POTENTIAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR FMVSS NO. 208 Prepared By The OFFICE OF VEHICLE SAFETY RESEARCH WILLIAM T. HOLLOWELL HAMPTON C. GABLER SHELDON L. STUCKI STEPHEN SUMMERS JAMES R. HACKNEY,
More informationFORD FIGO (NO AIRBAGS)
FORD FIGO (NO AIRBAGS) 20.75 max. 49.00 Child Ford Figo, RHD 4 door hatchback 1,274 kg 18 month old Child Maxi Cosi Cabrio Fix Protected / Good 0+ Belted RWF 3 year old Child Maxi Cosi Priori XP Vulnerable/
More informationCRASH TESTS TO ASSESS THE SECONDARY SAFETY OF A LARGE MPV
CRASH TESTS TO ASSESS THE SECONDARY SAFETY OF A LARGE MPV Alexander Berg Marcus Gärtner Peter Rücker DEKRA Automobil GmbH Germany Holger Kaiser DaimlerChrysler AG Germany Paper Number 07-0124 ABSTRACT
More information20XX. Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam
20XX Car safety rating 2015 by Folksam Preface Folksam has a long tradition in the area of traffic safety research. We have been collecting and analyzing information about road traffic crashes and injuries
More informationENHANCEMENT OF SEAT PERFORMANCE IN LOW-SPEED REAR IMPACT
ENHANCEMENT OF SEAT PERFORMANCE IN LOW-SPEED REAR IMPACT Harald Zellmer Michael Stamm Alexander Seidenschwang Autoliv GmbH, Elmshorn, Germany Anton Brunner Winterthur Insurance Corp., Dep. of Accident
More informationBalancing Active and Passive Safety
Balancing Active and Passive Safety Dnr: 2011-01146 Cecilia Sunnevång Ulrich Sander, Ola Boström September 17 th, 2015 Driven for Life. Background US legal & rating Automated Driving NHTSA Oblique (potential)
More informationThe influence of passive safety systems on head injuries suffered by the vehicle s driver
The influence of passive safety systems on head injuries suffered by the vehicle s driver Oana V. Oţăt, Nicolae Dumitru, and Victor Oţăt Abstract - The present research paper underpins a thorough comparative
More informationADSEAT. An EU funded project within the 7th Framework Programme. Adaptive Seat to Reduce Neck Injuries for Female and Male Occupants
ADSEAT An EU funded project within the 7th Framework Programme Adaptive Seat to Reduce Neck Injuries for Female and Male Occupants Citizens who annually suffer whiplash injuries in the EU 800 000 Socio-economic
More informationExisting safety technology is the driverless vehicle already here? Matthew Avery Safety Research Director
Existing safety technology is the driverless vehicle already here? Matthew Avery Safety Research Director Automotive Safety Primary vs Secondary Safety Primary Safety Secondary Safety Tertiary Safety Pre-crash
More informationDigges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA Dainius Dalmotas Transport Canada Ottawa, Canada Paper Number
More informationThe Increasing Role of SUVs in Crash Involvement in Germany
Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e. V. The Increasing Role of SUVs in Crash Involvement in Germany Dr. Axel Malczyk German Insurers Accident Research ICROBI Dublin, 12.09.2012 Gesamtverband
More informationClassification of Crash Pattern Based on Vehicle Acceleration and Prediction Algorithm for Occupant Injury
M. Katagiri et al./international Journal of Automotive Engineering 4 (3) 9-6 Research Paper 3497 Classification of Crash Pattern Based on Vehicle Acceleration and Prediction Algorithm for Occupant Injury
More informationShopping for a. safer car. insurance institute for highway safety
Shopping for a safer car 2013 insurance institute for highway safety Selecting a safer new vehicle is a lot easier than it used to be. Most new cars, minivans, pickup trucks and SUVs earn good ratings
More informationPedestrian protection - Pedestrian in collision with personal car
Pedestrian protection - Pedestrian in collision with personal car Authors: Jiří Svoboda, Ing; Zdeněk Šolc, Ing. Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Automotive
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF MOVING DEFORMABLE BARRIER IN JAPAN - PART 2 -
DEVELOPMENT OF MOVING DEFORMABLE BARRIER IN JAPAN - PART 2 - Masanori Ueno Takeshi Harigae Haruo Ohmae Japan Automobile Research Institute Takahiko Uchimura Eiji Fujiwara Japan Automobile Manufacturers
More informationKuroe 1 EXPLORATORY STUDY OF AN AIRBAG CONCEPT FOR A LARGE TOURING MOTORCYCLE : FURTHER RESEARCH SECOND REPORT
EXPLORATORY STUDY OF AN AIRBAG CONCEPT FOR A LARGE TOURING MOTORCYCLE : FURTHER RESEARCH SECOND REPORT Takeshi Kuroe Hideo Namiki Satoshi Iijima Honda R&D Co., Ltd. Asaka R&D Center Japan Paper Number
More informationRelationship of Dynamic Seat/Head Restraint Ratings to Real-world Neck Injury Rates
Relationship of Dynamic Seat/Head Restraint Ratings to Real-world Neck Injury Rates Charles M. Farmer, Laurie A. Hellinga, Jo Ann K. Wells, David S. Zuby Basic method Collect insurance claims for late
More informationINSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY 1005 NORTH GLEBE ROAD ARLINGTON, VA 22201 PHONE 703/247-1500 FAX 703/247-1678 http://www.highwaysafety.
Statement before the Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of Representatives Approaches to achieving vehicle safety improvements Brian O Neill INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY 1005 NORTH GLEBE
More informationPEDESTRIAN HEAD IMPACT ANALYSIS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJMET) International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET), ISSN 0976 6340(Print), ISSN 0976 6340 (Print) ISSN 0976 6359
More informationCORRELATION OF VEHICLE AND ROADSIDE CRASH TEST INJURY CRITERIA
CORRELATION OF VEHICLE AND ROADSIDE CRASH TEST INJURY CRITERIA Douglas Gabauer Rowan University United States Robert Thomson Chalmers University Sweden Paper Number 5-3 ABSTRACT The vehicle safety and
More informationANCIS. The Australian National Crash In-depth Study. David Logan (MUARC)
ANCIS The Australian National Crash In-depth Study David Logan (MUARC) What is ANCIS? Study of modern vehicle real world crash performance and occupant injuries Criteria: Occupants of crashed vehicles
More informationFIMCAR III Car-to-Car Test Results
Peter Sandqvist, Robert Thompson, Anders Kling, Linus Wagström, Pascal Delannoy, Nicolas Vie, Ignacio Lazaro, Stefano Candellero, Jean-Louis Nicaise, Fabien Duboc FIMCAR III Car-to-Car Test Results The
More informationThe SIPS (Side Impact Protection System) includes side and Inflatable Curtain (IC) airbags that protect both front and rear occupants.
SAFETY In brief: Volvo s commitment to safety is as old as the company itself, and the Volvo S60 has been extensively crash tested in the award winning Volvo Safety Centre in Gothenburg, Sweden and features
More informationIIHS crashworthiness evaluation programs and the U.S. vehicle fleet
Bulletin Vol. 30, No. 7 : April 2013 IIHS crashworthiness evaluation programs and the U.S. vehicle fleet The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) conducts several different vehicle crashworthiness
More informationSignal Analysis, Modeling and Simulation of Vehicle Crash Dynamics
Signal Analysis, Modeling and Simulation of Vehicle Crash Dynamics Students: Debela Yadeta Midjena Sanin Muraspahic Supervisors: Prof. Hamid Reza Karimi Prof. Kjell Gunnar Robbersmyr A thesis submitted
More informationTHE SIGNIFICANCE OF PERMANENT DISABILITIES DATABASE BASED ON AUTOMOBILE COLLISIONS IN JAPAN
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PERMANENT DISABILITIES DATABASE BASED ON AUTOMOBILE COLLISIONS IN JAPAN Koshiro Ono Japan Automobile Research Institute, Japan Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis,
More informationUNDERSTANDING YOUR VEHICLE S. What every driver and passenger should know
UNDERSTANDING YOUR VEHICLE S What every driver and passenger should know This booklet was prepared to answer questions about seat belts, airbags, and other safety equipment in newer Honda and Acura vehicles.
More informationInjury Criteria for Q Dummies in Frontal Impact
CRS-1-3 Injury Criteria for Q Dummies in Frontal Impact Analysis performed for EEVC WG12 & 18 Prepared by: Kees Waagmeester (on behalf of EEVC WG12&18) Date: June 13, 2007 Presentation Contents Summary
More informationGerman Insurance Association No. 38. Compact accident research. Small-overlap frontal impacts involving passenger cars in Germany
German Insurance Association No. 38 Compact accident research Small-overlap frontal impacts involving passenger cars in Germany Imprint German Insurance Association Insurers Accident Research Wilhelmstraße
More informationRear Impact Dummy Biofidelity
GTR 7 Informal Working Group February 28 March 1 211 Brussels, Belgium Rear Impact Dummy Biofidelity Kevin Moorhouse, Ph.D. NHTSA Yun-Seok Kang Ohio State University Objectives & Tasks Evaluate biofidelity
More informationContents. 1. What types of car restraints are available? 3. 2. Buying a car child seat- checklist 5. 3. Tips for fitting car seats 6
Child Car Safety Contents 1. What types of car restraints are available? 3 2. Buying a car child seat- checklist 5 3. Tips for fitting car seats 6 4. How to use car seats 6 5. Legislation for child safety
More informationWays to Reduce to Motorcycle Accidents
4th. Asia Automobile Institute Summit 24-25 September 2015, Chongqing Ways to Reduce to Motorcycle Accidents Yuji Arai Safety Research Division Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Contents 1. Historical
More informationThink Before You Drive is a global road safety initiative of the FIA Foundation, Bridgestone Corporation and motoring clubs worldwide. FIA Foundation for the Automobile and Society www.fiafoundation.com
More informationAccident Analysis Methodology and Development of Injury Scenarios
PROPOSED REDUCTION OF CAR CRASH INJURIES THROUGH IMPROVED SMART RESTRAINT DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES Accident Analysis Methodology and Development of Injury Scenarios Report Reference: R & R5 Author(s):
More informationSEAT BELTS AND AIRBAGS
SEAT BELTS AND AIRBAGS Competence in Safety. A pioneer in automotive safety. Mercedes-Benz has been passionate about making cars each one even better than the last from day one. Since the first models
More information40,46 16,22 16,25. no fx thoracic sp. Fx lumbar spine. no fx lumbar. spine
Spine injuries in motor vehicle accidents an analysis of 34188 injured front passengers with special consideration of injuries of the thoracolumbar in relation to injury mechanisms C. W. Müller, D. Otte,
More informationINDUSTRY REPORT ON AIRBAG INDUSTRY
INDUSTRY REPORT ON AIRBAG INDUSTRY AIRBAG MARKET GROWTH DRIVERS: Key drivers for airbags industry are: Federal regulation-first and foremost Public awareness General increase in concerns for safety Development
More informationINJURY BIOMECHANICS IN VULNERABLE POPULATIONS
INJURY BIOMECHANICS IN VULNERABLE POPULATIONS Developing Tools to Study Injury in Children & Seniors Megan Mackenzie Toyota Technical Center Dr. Jonathan Rupp University of Michigan Transportation Research
More informationPREDICTING THE USED CAR SAFETY RATINGS CRASHWORTHINESS RATING FROM ANCAP SCORES
PREDICTING THE USED CAR SAFETY RATINGS CRASHWORTHINESS RATING FROM ANCAP SCORES by Stuart Newstead and Jim Scully April 2012 Report No. 309 Project Sponsored By The Vehicle Safety Research Group ii MONASH
More informationEUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) FILM & PHOTO PROTOCOL
EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) FILM & PHOTO PROTOCOL November 2014 Copyright 2014 Euro NCAP - This work is the intellectual property of Euro NCAP. Permission is granted for this material
More informationA METHOD TO ESTIMATE INJURY MEDICAL COST OF OCCUPANTS IN A CRASH TEST
A METHOD TO ESTIMATE INJURY MEDICAL COST OF OCCUPANTS IN A CRASH TEST Ching-Huei Lai Ji-Liang Doong Department of Mechanical Engineering National Central University Taiwan Tso-Liang Teng Department of
More informationIncreased cooperation for the future of electrification
Increased cooperation for the future of electrification Robert Eriksson Hans Göran Milding Swedish Hybrid Center Conference Roads To The Future 2014-03-13 Robert Eriksson, Hans Göran Milding Volvo Car
More informationImproving Driving Safety Through Automation
Improving Driving Safety Through Automation Congressional Robotics Caucus John Maddox National Highway Traffic Safety Administration July 25, 2012 NHTSA s Missions Safety Save lives, prevent injuries and
More informationLong-term medical consequences to children injured in car crashes and influence of crash directions
Long-term medical consequences to children injured in car crashes and influence of crash directions Katarina Bohman 1,2), Helena Stigson 2,3), Maria Krafft 3,4) 1) Autoliv Research, 2) Karolinska Institutet,
More informationDocket Management System U.S. Department of Transportation Room PL-401 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20590-0001 Via: http://dms.dot.
Docket Management System U.S. Department of Transportation Room PL-401 400 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20590-0001 Via: http://dms.dot.gov Comments of Consumers Union of US Inc. to National Highway
More informationABSTRACT INTRODUCTION
AN EVALUATION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED INJURY CRITERIA WITH VARIOUS DUMMIES TO DETERMINE THEIR ABILITY TO PREDICT THE LEVELS OF SOFT TISSUE NECK INJURY SEEN IN REAL WORLD ACCIDENTS Frank Heitplatz Raimondo
More informationPaper Number 15-0328. Paine, Page 1
VEHICLE SAFETY TRENDS AND THE INFLUENCE OF NCAP SAFETY RATINGS Michael Paine David Paine Jason Smith Australasian NCAP, Australia Michael Case RACV, Australia Jack Haley NRMA Motoring & Services, Australia
More informationCollision Avoidance. The car we couldn t crash! The future for drivers. Compare the technologies. research news
special edition volume three, issue two February, 2008 research news Collision Avoidance The car we couldn t crash! During the low speed bumper crash test of the new Volvo, its automatic braking system
More informationA Systematic Approach for Improving Occupant Protection in Rollover Crashes
SAE 2011 Government / Industry Meeting A Systematic Approach for Improving Occupant Protection in Rollover Crashes Jingwen Hu, PhD University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute King H. Yang,
More informationIn-vehicle Technologies for Increasing Seat Belt Use
In-vehicle Technologies for Increasing Seat Belt Use TRB Annual Meeting Washington, DC January 14, 2013 David G. Kidd Safety belt use in the US has risen in large part due to publicized enforcement and
More informationAlternative lower rail design to lower injury level of occupant caused by frontal crash
Alternative lower rail design to lower injury level of occupant caused by frontal crash W. Beek (0557959) MT06.20 Internal traineeship Supervisor: Dr. ir. W.J. Witteman Eindhoven University of Technology
More informationUS FMVSS 202 Final Rule
Comparison of Regulations FMVSS 202 (Current standard, Final Rule, and ) A. Application 1. Vehicles Front outboard seating positions in passenger cars, MPVs and trucks with a GVWR 4536 kg 2. Requirements
More informationPromoting advanced vehicle safety technologies
1 Promoting advanced vehicle safety technologies esafety background paper 2 Contents Foreword What is esafety? Key esafety applications Awareness campaigns Annexes 3 Foreword There is no doubt that new
More informationHow Do Euro NCAP Results Correlate with Real-Life Injury Risks? A Paired Comparison Study of Car-to-Car Crashes
Traffic Injury Prevention, 3:288 293, 2002 Copyright C 2002 Taylor & Francis 1538-9588/02 $12.00 +.00 DOI: 10.1080/15389580290129044 How Do Euro NCAP Results Correlate with Real-Life Injury Risks? A Paired
More informationOn Predicting Lower Leg Injuries. for the EuroNCAP Front Crash
On Predicting Lower Leg Injuries for the EuroNCAP Front Crash Thomas Hofer, Altair Engineering GmbH Peter Karlsson, Saab Automobile AB Niclas Brännberg, Altair Engineering AB Lars Fredriksson, Altair Engineering
More informationCONSUMER INFORMATION ON THE CRASH PERFORMANCE OF CARS: The role of the EU
CONSUMER INFORMATION ON THE CRASH PERFORMANCE OF CARS: The role of the EU December 1995 European Transport Safety Council Rue du Cornet 34 B-1040 Brussels Tel.: +32 2 230 4106/4004 Fax: +32 2 230 4215
More informationCASE STUDY. Test Laboratories. Volvo Cars Safety Centre Accelerometers Help Improve Car Safety. Sweden. Automotive. Transducers
CASE STUDY Volvo Cars Safety Centre Accelerometers Help Improve Car Safety Sweden Automotive Transducers The name of Volvo is synonymous with car safety. The new Volvo Cars Safety Centre at Gothenburg,
More informationImpact Kinematics of Cyclist and Head Injury Mechanism in Car to Bicycle Collision
Impact Kinematics of Cyclist and Head Injury Mechanism in Car to Bicycle Collision Tadasuke Katsuhara, Hiroshi Miyazaki, Yuichi Kitagawa, Tsuyoshi Yasuki Abstract The number of cyclist fatalities is the
More informationTalking Points. About Roadway Users
General facts regarding the driver: Talking Points About Roadway Users Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death in the U.S. for people ages 6-33. They annually account for more than 1 million
More informationVehicle Safety Systems
Vehicle Safety Systems 11-12 September 2009 SECC and Glasgow Science Centre The UKRO authorises the use of the educational information contained within this document, however reference must be given to
More informationThe Relationship between Speed and Car Driver Injury Severity
Road Safety Web Publication 9 The Relationship between Speed and Car Driver Injury Severity D. Richards and R. Cuerden Transport Research Laboratory April 2009 Department for Transport: London Although
More informationStatement before Massachusetts Legislature s Joint Committee on Insurance. Institute Research on Cosmetic Crash Parts. Stephen L. Oesch.
Statement before Massachusetts Legislature s Joint Committee on Insurance Institute Research on Cosmetic Crash Parts Stephen L. Oesch INSURANCE INSTITUTE FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY 1005 N. GLEBE RD. ARLINGTON,
More informationCRASH AVOIDANCE TOP SAFETY PICKS
So you ve decided to buy a car, minivan, SUV, or pickup. Now the question is, which one? If you factor safety into your choice (most people do), then you probably want to know, what s the safest vehicle
More informationDOT HS 811 834 September 2013. Evaluation of the Certified-Advanced Air Bags
DOT HS 811 834 September 2013 Evaluation of the Certified-Advanced Air Bags DISCLAIMER This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
More informationU.S. ROAD FATALITIES PER POPULATION: CHANGES BY AGE FROM 1958 TO 2008
UMTRI-2011-9 MARCH 2011 U.S. ROAD FATALITIES PER POPULATION: CHANGES BY AGE FROM 1958 TO 2008 MICHAEL SIVAK BRANDON SCHOETTLE U.S. ROAD FATALITIES PER POPULATION: CHANGES BY AGE FROM 1958 to 2008 Michael
More informationQ dummy family. Fahrzeugsicherheit Berlin e.v. Robert Kant, Christian Kleessen (Humanetics)
Computational models of Q dummy family Ines Lehmann, Heiko Johannsen (VFSB) Robert Kant, Christian Kleessen (Humanetics) Protection of children hld in cars, December 2 3, 2010, Munich Fahrzeugsicherheit
More informationCYBEX GmbH Riedinger Str. 18 95448 Bayreuth Germany. info@cybex-online.com www.cybex-online.com www.facebook.com/cybex.online
CYBEX GmbH Riedinger Str. 18 95448 Bayreuth Germany info@cybex-online.com www.cybex-online.com www.facebook.com/cybex.online GO TO WWW.CYBEX-ONLINE.COM TO WATCH AN INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEO C233_051-3_01A PALLAS
More informationFIRST RESULTS FROM THE JAMA HUMAN BODY MODEL PROJECT
FIRST RESULTS FROM THE JAMA HUMAN BODY MODEL PROJECT Tomiji Sugimoto Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Inc. Kunio Yamazaki Japan Automobile Research Institute Japan Paper Number 05-0291 ABSTRACT
More informationMinor Vehicle Collision and Injury Analysis. André M. Loyd, Ph.D. Biomechanical Engineer
Minor Vehicle Collision and Injury Analysis André M. Loyd, Ph.D. Biomechanical Engineer Personal Bio Education Post-Doctoral Fellowship at the Mayo Clinic - Helmets and Neck Guards in Hockey Ph.D. and
More informationAuto Insurers Adventure in US Highway Safety
Auto Insurers Adventure in US Highway Safety Global NCAP Malacca, Malaysia May 23, 2012 Adrian K. Lund, Ph.D. President, IIHS and HLDI The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, founded in 1959, is an
More informationThe Science of Pet Safety. Center for Pet Safety 2015 Pet Travel Seat Pilot Summary Report. Scope. Background. Purpose.
1.800.324.3659 www.centerforpetsafety.org October 2, 2015 Center for Pet Safety 2015 Pet Travel Seat Pilot Summary Report Sponsored by Subaru of America Lindsey A. Wolko Center for Pet Safety Scope In
More informationThorsten Adolph, Marcus Wisch, Andre Eggers, Heiko Johannsen, Richard Cuerden, Jolyon Carroll, David Hynd, Ulrich Sander
IRC-13-17 Analyses of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Injuries in Frontal IRCOBI Impacts Conference 13 Thorsten Adolph, Marcus Wisch, Andre Eggers, Heiko Johannsen, Richard Cuerden, Jolyon Carroll, David Hynd,
More informationVehicle Safety. Vehicle Safety web text. Please refer to this document as: SafetyNet (2009) Vehicle Safety, retrieved <add date of retrieval here>
Vehicle Safety Please refer to this document as: SafetyNet (2009) Vehicle Safety, retrieved 16/10/2009 Page 1 Vehicle Safety...1 1. Vehicle Safety...3 2. Vehicle design and
More informationPole/Tree Crashes; Injury Outcomes; New Car Assessment Programme; Australian design Rules (ADR s)
Injury Outcomes in Pole/Tree Crashes Andrew Morris and Niklas Truedsson Monash University Accident Research Centre Clayton, Victoria, Australia. Martina Stallgardh and Maria Magnisson Halmsted University,
More informationExperts in Safety, Security and Crash Repair
Experts in Safety, Security and Crash Repair Lesley Upham, Commercial Director, Thatcham Research Manchester November 2012 The Company The Company Established in 1969 170+ employees Turnover of 16.6million
More information