Teoretisk Fysik KTH. Advanced QM (SI2380), test questions 1



Similar documents
1 Variational calculation of a 1D bound state

Similarity and Diagonalization. Similar Matrices

PHY4604 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Fall 2004 Practice Test 3 November 22, 2004

[1] Diagonal factorization

1 Completeness of a Set of Eigenfunctions. Lecturer: Naoki Saito Scribe: Alexander Sheynis/Allen Xue. May 3, The Neumann Boundary Condition

N 1. (q k+1 q k ) 2 + α 3. k=0

Chapter 6. Orthogonality

8 Hyperbolic Systems of First-Order Equations

An Introduction to Hartree-Fock Molecular Orbital Theory

Linear algebra and the geometry of quadratic equations. Similarity transformations and orthogonal matrices

CITY UNIVERSITY LONDON. BEng Degree in Computer Systems Engineering Part II BSc Degree in Computer Systems Engineering Part III PART 2 EXAMINATION

CHAPTER IV - BROWNIAN MOTION

Potential Energy Surfaces C. David Sherrill School of Chemistry and Biochemistry Georgia Institute of Technology


Orthogonal Projections and Orthonormal Bases

2m + V ( ˆX) (1) 2. Consider a particle in one dimensions whose Hamiltonian is given by

Recall the basic property of the transpose (for any A): v A t Aw = v w, v, w R n.

Chapter 17. Orthogonal Matrices and Symmetries of Space

The Matrix Elements of a 3 3 Orthogonal Matrix Revisited

r (t) = 2r(t) + sin t θ (t) = r(t) θ(t) + 1 = 1 1 θ(t) Write the given system in matrix form x = Ax + f ( ) sin(t) x y z = dy cos(t)

1.3. DOT PRODUCT If θ is the angle (between 0 and π) between two non-zero vectors u and v,

Till now, almost all attention has been focussed on discussing the state of a quantum system.

8.04: Quantum Mechanics Professor Allan Adams Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Problem Set 5

MAT 242 Test 2 SOLUTIONS, FORM T

Linear Algebra Review. Vectors

221A Lecture Notes Path Integral

SF2940: Probability theory Lecture 8: Multivariate Normal Distribution

Examination paper for TMA4115 Matematikk 3

Groups and Representations in Quantum Mechanics

Au = = = 3u. Aw = = = 2w. so the action of A on u and w is very easy to picture: it simply amounts to a stretching by 3 and 2, respectively.

Section Inner Products and Norms

α = u v. In other words, Orthogonal Projection

Orthogonal Diagonalization of Symmetric Matrices

Least-Squares Intersection of Lines

= N 2 = 3π2 n = k 3 F. The kinetic energy of the uniform system is given by: 4πk 2 dk h2 k 2 2m. (2π) 3 0

17. Inner product spaces Definition Let V be a real vector space. An inner product on V is a function

x = + x 2 + x

SF2940: Probability theory Lecture 8: Multivariate Normal Distribution

x + y + z = 1 2x + 3y + 4z = 0 5x + 6y + 7z = 3

Introduction to Matrix Algebra

DATA ANALYSIS II. Matrix Algorithms

BANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW

by the matrix A results in a vector which is a reflection of the given

MATH 423 Linear Algebra II Lecture 38: Generalized eigenvectors. Jordan canonical form (continued).

Brief Review of Tensors

MA106 Linear Algebra lecture notes

Høgskolen i Narvik Sivilingeniørutdanningen STE6237 ELEMENTMETODER. Oppgaver

Time dependence in quantum mechanics Notes on Quantum Mechanics

ASEN Structures. MDOF Dynamic Systems. ASEN 3112 Lecture 1 Slide 1

LINEAR ALGEBRA W W L CHEN

Lecture 1: Schur s Unitary Triangularization Theorem

160 CHAPTER 4. VECTOR SPACES

1 Complex Numbers in Quantum Mechanics

Bindel, Spring 2012 Intro to Scientific Computing (CS 3220) Week 3: Wednesday, Feb 8

1 Lecture 3: Operators in Quantum Mechanics

Operator methods in quantum mechanics

Inner Product Spaces

ENERGY TRANSFER IN THE WEAK AND STRONG COUPLING REGIME

Methods for Finding Bases

Quantum Mechanics: Postulates

The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Stephen Webb

Numerical Analysis Lecture Notes

State of Stress at Point

Conductance, the Normalized Laplacian, and Cheeger s Inequality

1 VECTOR SPACES AND SUBSPACES

Mathematics Course 111: Algebra I Part IV: Vector Spaces

Constrained Least Squares

Review of Statistical Mechanics

Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors, and Differential Equations

0.1 Phase Estimation Technique

Physics 221A Spring 2016 Notes 1 The Mathematical Formalism of Quantum Mechanics

Lecture 5: Singular Value Decomposition SVD (1)

MATH APPLIED MATRIX THEORY

Math 115A HW4 Solutions University of California, Los Angeles. 5 2i 6 + 4i. (5 2i)7i (6 + 4i)( 3 + i) = 35i + 14 ( 22 6i) = i.

October 3rd, Linear Algebra & Properties of the Covariance Matrix

Second Order Linear Partial Differential Equations. Part I

Techniques algébriques en calcul quantique

0 <β 1 let u(x) u(y) kuk u := sup u(x) and [u] β := sup

The quantum mechanics of particles in a periodic potential: Bloch s theorem

1. Let P be the space of all polynomials (of one real variable and with real coefficients) with the norm

arxiv:hep-th/ v1 25 Jul 2005

Linear Algebra: Determinants, Inverses, Rank

13 MATH FACTS a = The elements of a vector have a graphical interpretation, which is particularly easy to see in two or three dimensions.

The Characteristic Polynomial

Wavelet analysis. Wavelet requirements. Example signals. Stationary signal 2 Hz + 10 Hz + 20Hz. Zero mean, oscillatory (wave) Fast decay (let)

Lecture 3: Finding integer solutions to systems of linear equations

Lecture 18 - Clifford Algebras and Spin groups

F en = mω 0 2 x. We should regard this as a model of the response of an atom, rather than a classical model of the atom itself.

Linear Algebra I. Ronald van Luijk, 2012

Chapter 15, example problems:

4: EIGENVALUES, EIGENVECTORS, DIAGONALIZATION

Continuity of the Perron Root

7. Show that the expectation value function that appears in Lecture 1, namely

Linear Algebra Done Wrong. Sergei Treil. Department of Mathematics, Brown University

Linear Algebra and TI 89

Transcription:

Teoretisk Fysik KTH Advanced QM (SI238), test questions NOTE THAT I TYPED THIS IN A HURRY AND TYPOS ARE POSSIBLE: PLEASE LET ME KNOW BY EMAIL IF YOU FIND ANY (I will try to correct typos asap - if you find a typo several days after this has been published, please check the course homepage if the typo you found has not yet been corrected before sending me a email). Abbreviations: [S] = J J Sakurai: Modern Quantum Mechanics, Second Edition (Pearson, 2) [S] P.8 = Problem.8 in [S] (etc.); [S] Ch..2 = Chapter.2 in [S] (etc.); [S] Eq. (.3.39a) = Equation (.3.39a) in [S] (etc.) In the second midterm test you will get questions similar to the following (to check that you digested the material in [S] we discussed in the course). Some hints on how to answer these questions are given at the end of this text. All problems are on [S] Ch. 5.. Find the eigenvalues of the matrix C A + λb, A = 2, B = 3 3 4 5 4 6 7 5 7 8 and λ a small coupling constants, in second order perturbation theory. Compute also the corresponding eigenvectors in first order perturbation theory. 2 Hints: 3 Let H = H + λv, with V n,m n V m and H n = E n n, (a) If E m E m m n : E n = E n + λv n,n + λ 2 m n, n n =, n, m = δ n,m. n V n,m V m,n +... En Em V m,n n = n + λ m E m n n Em +.... (b) If En En = En 2 = = En g, Em En m n j : g g H eff = En n j n j + λ V nj,n k n j n k. j= Version (v) by Edwin Langmann on September 25, 2; revised by EL on September 27, 2 2 A typical midterm question would be to compute one of these eigenvalues to second order- of one of these eigenstates. 3 In any possible questions on perturbation theory you will be given the information below. j,k=

2. Find the eigenvalues of the matrix C A + λb, A =, B = 3 3 4 5 4 9 7 5 7 8 and λ a small coupling constants, in first order perturbation theory. Hints: Same as in Problem. 3. Use the variational method to find the best approximation to the smallest eigenvalue and corresponding eigenvector of a matrix A using a given variational eigenvector v: ( ) ( ) 3 A =, v = 3 7 α with α a real variational parameter. 4. Use the variational method to find the best approximation to the smallest eigenvalue and the corresponding eigenvector of a matrix A using a given variational eigenvector v: A = 2 3 2 4 5 3 5 6 with α a real variational parameter. 5. Given the Hamiltonian d 2, v = H = 2 + V (x), V (x) = 2m dx2 α, { if x < a otherwise of a quantum particle in one dimension and in the position representation. Use the variational function { a 2 x 2 if x < a u(x) = otherwise to estimate the groundstate energy of this Hamiltonian. Compare your result with the exact result. 6. Given the Hamiltonian d 2 H = 2 2m dx λδ(x) 2 of a quantum particle in one dimension and in the position representation, with λ >. Use the variational function u(x) = e α x, with α a variational parameter, to estimate the groundstate energy of this Hamiltonian. Compare your result with the exact result. 2

7. Use the variational method to find the best approximation to the groundstate energy and the corresponding groundstate of a Hamiltonian H using the given variational state : H = 2 j= ( ) t j j + + j + j λ, = + a with a real variational parameter a; t > and λ > are model parameters. 8. Let H be a Hamiltonian with groundstate E (= smallest eigenvalue of H). Prove that, for any state, H E. () Describe how this result can be used to find approximations to the groundstate and groundstate energy of H. You can assume that H has orthonormal eigenstates j with corresponding eigenvalues E j, j =,, 2,.... 9. Consider the Schrödinger equation for a time dependent Hamiltonian H = H + V (t), i t α; t = (H + V (t)) α; t, α; t ) = α, (2) and assume that H has an orthonormal basis of eigenstates j with corresponding eigenvalues E j, j =, 2, 3,.... Show that (2) has the solution α; t = j c j (t)e ie jt/ j. (3) with c j (t) determined by the following equation, c j (t) = c j (t ) + k t ds e i(e j E k )s/ V jk (s)c k (s) (4) i t with V j,k (t) j V (t) k. Use this to derive the solution c j (t) in second order perturbation theory.. Consider the Hamiltonian H = E + E 2 2 2, V (t) = γ 2 e iωt + γ 2 e iωt with orthonormal kets j, j =, 2, and real parameters E 2 > E, γ, and ω >. Find the solution of the time dependent Schrödinger equation i t α; t = (H + V (t)) α; t, α; =, using first order time dependent perturbation theory. Use this result to compute the probability α; t 2 in leading non-trivial order. Give a physical interpretation of α; t 2. 3

Hint: First order time dependent perturbation theory: α; t = j c j (t)e ie jt/ j with c j (t) c j () + i and V j,k (t) j V (t) k. k t dse ie js/ V jk (s)e ie ks/ c k () 4

Hints. The eigenvalues of A are all different, and we thus can use non-degenerate perturbation theory. As an example, I only compute the eigenvalue c 2 = 2 +... of C: c 2 = a 2 + λb 2,2 + λ 2 j 2 and the corresponding eigenvector v 2 e 2 + λ j 2 with e j the usual basis vectors. B 2,j B ( j,2 7 + = 2 + λ6 + λ 2 2 ) a 2 a j 2 3 + 42 +... 2 V j2 e j = e 2 + λ 7 a 2 a j 2 3 e 3 + λ 4 2 e 3 = 4λ 7λ Answer: c = + 3λ 57 2 λ2 +..., c 2 = 2 + 6λ 33λ 2 +..., c 3 = 3 + 8λ + 23 2 λ2 +... 4λ 5λ/2 v = 4λ 5λ/2 +, v 2 = 7λ +, v 3 = 7λ + Remark: A useful check of the computation is to verify that the eigenvectors v j are indeed orthogonal in leading order in λ. 2. The third eigenvalue of C can be computed by non-degenerate perturbation theory. The first two eigenvalues of A are degenerate, and thus these eigenvalues have to be computed by diagonalizing ( ) + 3λ 4λ C eff = 4λ + 9λ ( ) ( 3 4 + λ 4 9 Answer: c = + λ +..., c 2 = + λ +..., c 3 = 3 + 8λ +.... 3. Compute E(α) v A v v v = + 6α 7α2 + α 2. and find the minimum by solving E (α) =. The latter equation has two solutions α = 3 and α 2 = /3, and one can check that the first solution corresponds to the minimum. Answer: The best approximation to the lowest eigenvalue a min of A is E(3) = 8, and a min 8. Remark: In this case the variational method gives the exact answer, which is not the case in general, of course. ) 5

4. In this case E(α) v A v v v = + 4α + 4α2 + α 2. which has a minimum at α = /2 with E( /2) =. Answer: The best approximation to the lowest eigenvalue a min of A is E( /2) =, and a min. Remark: The exact value of the smallest eigenvalue is.557... (this is found by numerical diagonalization of A). 5. See [S], Ch. 5.4, in particular Eq. (5.4.4). 6. Note that in this case the exact groundstate has the form of the variational function, so in this example the variational method gives the exact answer (you computed the exact solution in a previous exercise). 7. Compute and find the minimum of E(a). E(a) H λ + 2ta = + a 2 Answer: The best possible approximation to the groundstate energy E is E min = 2t 2 /( 4t 2 + λ 2 λ) E. It is obtained at a = a min = ( 4t 2 + λ 2 λ)/(2t). 8. See [S] Ch. 5.4. 9. See [S] Ch. 5.7, or (alternatively) my notes N (available on my logbook on the course homepage).. See [S] p 34-34 or my notes N. The exact answer to this problem is in [S] Eq. (5.5.2). Answer: c (t), c 2 (t) i t dsγe iωs+i(e 2 E )s/ = γ ω ( ei ωt ) with ω (E 2 E )/ ω. Thus, in leading non-trivial order, α; t 2 = c (t) 2 = c 2 (t) 2 4γ2 sin 2 ( ωt/2) 2 ω 2. This is the probability that the system is in the state at time t >, assuming it is in this state at time t =. 6