Prestressed Concrete I-Beam and TxGirder Haunch Design Guide



Similar documents
Index Series Prestressed Florida-I Beams (Rev. 07/12)

Bridge Type Selection

Overhang Bracket Loading. Deck Issues: Design Perspective

PENNDOT e-notification

Figure A. Maximum load testing of new precast concrete floor plank system

Quality Control and Quality Assurance Guide

Formwork for Concrete

Two-Way Post-Tensioned Design

GEOMETRIC DESIGN CIVL 3161

9.3 Two-way Slabs (Part I)

SECTION 5 ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS SPANS DEVELOPED BY THE PTI EDC-130 EDUCATION COMMITTEE LEAD AUTHOR: BRYAN ALLRED

Safe & Sound Bridge Terminology

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

A transverse strip of the deck is assumed to support the truck axle loads. Shear and fatigue of the reinforcement need not be investigated.

SLAB DESIGN. Introduction ACI318 Code provides two design procedures for slab systems:

SECTION 3 DESIGN OF POST- TENSIONED COMPONENTS FOR FLEXURE

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

TXDOT ENGINEERING SOFTWARE SUPPORT INFORMATION. Prestressed Concrete Girder SUPERstructure Design and Analysis Program (PGSuper TM )

US 51 Ohio River Bridge Engineering and Environmental Study

SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS CROSS SLOPE VERIFICATION:

FOOTING DESIGN EXAMPLE

Reinforced Concrete Slab Design Using the Empirical Method

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION SERIES 8000 PRECAST CONCRETE

Residential Decks. Planning and Development Services Department

Joist. Reinforcement. Draft 12/7/02

Long-term serviceability of the structure Minimal maintenance requirements Economical construction Improved aesthetics and safety considerations

16. Beam-and-Slab Design

SLAB DESIGN EXAMPLE. Deck Design (AASHTO LRFD 9.7.1) TYPICAL SECTION. County: Any Hwy: Any Design: BRG Date: 7/2010

POST AND FRAME STRUCTURES (Pole Barns)

In-situ Load Testing to Evaluate New Repair Techniques

APPENDIX H DESIGN CRITERIA FOR NCHRP PROJECT NEW BRIDGE DESIGNS

DESIGN OF PRESTRESSED BARRIER CABLE SYSTEMS

4B The stiffness of the floor and roof diaphragms. 3. The relative flexural and shear stiffness of the shear walls and of connections.

Section A Roof Truss

AASHTOWare Bridge Design and Rating Training. STL8 Single Span Steel 3D Example (BrDR 6.6)

This manual was produced using ComponentOne Doc-To-Help.

The following sketches show the plans of the two cases of one-way slabs. The spanning direction in each case is shown by the double headed arrow.

CH. 2 LOADS ON BUILDINGS

TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION... 5 Advance Concrete... 5 Where to find information?... 6 INSTALLATION... 7 STARTING ADVANCE CONCRETE...

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

General Approach. Structure Components. Is all lumber the same? Lumber Grades. Rafters Girders / Beams Columns. Sketch general structural layout

Challenging Skew: Higgins Road Steel I-Girder Bridge over I-90 OTEC October 27, 2015 Session 26

REINFORCED CONCRETE. Reinforced Concrete Design. A Fundamental Approach - Fifth Edition. Walls are generally used to provide lateral support for:

Guide to Bridge Standard Drawings. March 2016 Bridge Division

Section 5A: Guide to Designing with AAC

Guidelines for the Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

Session 5D: Benefits of Live Load Testing and Finite Element Modeling in Rating Bridges

Chapter 8. Flexural Analysis of T-Beams

Steel joists and joist girders are

FEBRUARY 2014 LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN 4-1

CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB & CASTING BED CONSTRUCTION

Requirements for Building Application Submission

Load Design Charts. R-CONTROL SIPs STRUCTURAL INSULATED PANELS. CONTROL, NOT COMPROMISE.

June 2007 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.0 CHAPTER 7 - CULVERTS 7.1 GENERAL

FORM DESIGN. easy to work with, and generally available.

PRESTRESSED CONCRETE. Introduction REINFORCED CONCRETE CHAPTER SPRING Reinforced Concrete Design. Fifth Edition. By Dr. Ibrahim.

Module 5 (Lectures 17 to 19) MAT FOUNDATIONS

USE OF MICROPILES IN TEXAS BRIDGES. by John G. Delphia, P.E. TxDOT Bridge Division Geotechnical Branch

Integration of Structural Health Monitoring and Asset Management

Bracing Webs in Trusses that have Dissimilar Configurations

Module 7 (Lecture 24 to 28) RETAINING WALLS

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

PCI BIG BEAM COMPETITION

The Impact of Market Demands on Residential Post-Tensioned Foundation Design: An Ethical Dilemma

Elev. A = , Elev. B = , horizontal distance = 1625 feet a. 7.7 b..077 c d. 1.28

Settlement of Precast Culverts Under High Fills; The Influence of Construction Sequence and Structural Effects of Longitudinal Strains

Camber, The unkind Curve

Design Of Reinforced Concrete Structures ii Two-Way Slabs

PRODUCT AND ENGINEERING MANUAL

LOAD TESTING FOR BRIDGE RATING: DEAN S MILL OVER HANNACROIS CREEK

How To Write An Analysis System For Bridge Test

TSL Professional Services

Technical Notes 3B - Brick Masonry Section Properties May 1993

Residential Foundations and Basements

Chapter 6 ROOF-CEILING SYSTEMS

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Reinforced Concrete Design Project Five Story Office Building

Code of Standard Practice for Timber Frame Structures

ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE SEGMENTAL BEAM

STRUSOFT EXAMPLES PRE-STRESS 6.4

SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BI-DIRECTIONAL STATIC LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 6

Geometric Design 4.1 GEOMETRIC CROSS SECTION

Rehabilitation of the Red Bank Road Bridge over Hoover Reservoir. Presented By: Doug Stachler, P.E.

How To Design A Post Tensioned Deck For A Building

SECTION III-06 Surfacing Page 1 Revised 3/2/10. See the DESIGN GUIDELINES in Section I-06 for requirements for cross slope of the roadway.

CHAPTER 4 STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

SMIP05 Seminar Proceedings VISUALIZATION OF NONLINEAR SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF THE INTERSTATE 5/14 NORTH CONNECTOR BRIDGE. Robert K.

DSM 1 (800)

The unit costs are based on the trend line of the 3 low bids for the average quantity.

Preliminary steel concrete composite bridge design charts for Eurocodes

Technical Assignment 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Storm Drainage Systems

Aluminium systems profile selection

Numerical Analysis of the Moving Formwork Bracket Stress during Construction of a Curved Continuous Box Girder Bridge with Variable Width

Steel and composite bridges in Germany State of the Art

Elevating Your House. Introduction CHAPTER 5

INSTRUCTIONS AND PARTS LIST SINGLE GIRDER UNDERHUNG CRANE BRIDGE KITS 1/2 THRU 10 TON HAND GEARED AND MOTOR DRIVEN

Transcription:

Prestressed Concrete I-Beam and TxGirder Haunch Design Guide Components of the Haunch Camber: Camber is the upward deflection in the beam after release of the prestressing strands due to the eccentricity of the force in the strands. The camber of the beam is usually the largest contribution to haunch. As camber increases, so does haunch. Figure 1. Camber of Beam (Before Slab is Placed) Dead Load Deflection: The dead load deflection used in haunch calculations is the deflection due to the dead load of the slab only. The dead load helps lessen the haunch. As the dead load deflection increases the haunch decreases. Note: The dead load deflection calculated is for a cast-in-place slab. Where prestressed concrete panels are used, deflections used to screed the roadway surface will be different since the deflection due to the panels will already be there. Figure 2. Beam After Slab is Placed Cross Slope: The cross slope is the slope of the slab across the transverse section of the beam. The cross slope correction (CSC) is the distance from the bottom of the slab to the top of the beam at the center of the top flange needed to prevent encroachment of the beam into the slab at the lowest point of the cross slope. The CSC is needed for I-beams since the beams are placed vertically on the bearing pads. As CSC increases the haunch also increases. 1 of 14

Figure 3. Cross Slope Correction Vertical Clearance Ordinate (VCO): The VCO is the distance from the BGS reference line to the roadway surface. The reference line is the chorded roadway surface between center of bearings. The VCO is given in the BGS output as negative when the roadway surface is above the reference line and positive below the reference line. When the VCO is negative (crest curve) the haunch decreases at center of bearing, and when the VCO is positive (sag curve) the haunch increases at center of bearing. Figure 4. VCO with Respect to BGS Reference Line Figure 5. All Haunch Components Working Together Minimum and Maximum Haunch Values For I-beams: o The maximum haunch without reinforcing is 3. o The minimum haunch at the center of bearing is 1 for I-Beams to ensure there is haunch concrete under the prestressed concrete panels. 2 of 14

o The minimum haunch at midspan is ½ to accommodate bedding strips for prestressed concrete panels. For TxGirders: o The maximum haunch without reinforcing is 3 ½. o The minimum haunch at the center of bearing is 2 to accommodate the thickened slab end since the TxGirder flange is too thin to notch like the I-beam. o The minimum haunch at midspan is ½ to accommodate bedding strips for prestressed concrete panels. Steps to Calculating Haunch Step 1 ~ Execute a preliminary BGS run using a beam framing option from 1-10 in the FOPT card. On the BRNG card, input a Depth Below the Reference Line, or bearing deduct, of zero. This gives the VCLR output as the VCO defined above. Include a VCLR card for each span with the bridge alignment as the specified alignment. Step 2 ~ Examine BGS output. The vertical ordinate (VO) will be given along the beam at as many segments as defined in the VCLR card. The first and last columns of each VCLR table are the ordinates at the center of bearings and should equal zero. The VO taken at midspan is used in haunch calculations. This corresponds to the 0.5L column in the VCLR table as shown below. The sign convention shown in BGS should be used in the haunch calculations. Figure 6. BGS Output of VCLR Table Step 3 ~ Calculate the required minimum haunch at center of bearing at center of beam top flange that will work for all I-Beams in a span. Min. Haunch req d = C + VCO 0.8 DL + CSC + Min. Haunch CL Span Where, C = camber of the I-Beam, ft (taken from PSTRS14 Beam Summary Report or PGSuper TxDOT Summary Report under Camber and Deflection for the estimated camber at 120 days. NOTE: PGSuper gives camber in inches. The 3 of 14

camber will need to be converted to feet for the above equation.) VCO = vertical clearance ordinate at midspan, ft (taken from BGS VCLR output table) DL = absolute value of dead load deflection of I-Beam at midspan due to slab only, ft (taken from PSTRS14 Beam Summary Report at midspan or PGSuper TxDOT Summary Report under Camber and Deflection for deflections of slab and diaphragms. NOTE: PGSuper gives dead load deflection in inches. The dead load deflection will need to be converted to feet for the above equation.) CSC = cross slope correction, ft = CS x 0.5w f Where, CS = cross slope of slab above beam top flange, ft/ft w f = width of top flange, ft Min. Haunch CL Span = minimum haunch at midspan measured at the edge of the beam flange Use the largest required haunch value for that span: Haunch CL Brg = Min. Haunch req d (round up to the nearest ¼ ) This haunch value will be the haunch at center of bearing for each I-beam in that span. Step 4 ~ Calculate the haunch at center of span at center of beam top flange. Haunch CL Span = Haunch CL Brg C VCO + 0.8 DL CSC Step 5 ~ Calculate the slab dimensions at the center of bearing, X, the theoretical slab dimensions at mid-span, Z, and the depth from top of slab to bottom of beam at center of bearing, Y, for each I-Beam in the span. X = Haunch CL Brg + t s Y = X + Beam Depth Z = Haunch CL Span + t s + CSC Where, t s = slab thickness 4 of 14

Figure 7. X and Z Dimensions in Elevation View Figure 8. X, Y, and Z Dimensions in Section View NOTE: Z is a theoretical dimension Step 6 ~ Calculate the required bearing deduct used in computing the final bearing seat elevations. Bearing Deduct = Y + Bearing Pad Thickness (Values should be rounded to the nearest 1 / 8 ) 5 of 14

Vertical Curve Effects on Haunch Sag and Crest curve effects on haunches are shown below. Figure 9 shows a sag curve, which creates a minimum haunch at midspan with a much larger haunch at the ends. Figure 10 shows a large crest curve with respect to the beam camber. In this case, there is more haunch at midspan than at the ends. Figure 11 shows a typical crest curve where there is less haunch at midspan than at the ends. Figure 9. Sag Curve Effect on Haunch Figure 10. Large Crest Curve Effect on Haunch Figure 11. Small Crest Curve Effect on Haunch 6 of 14

Superelevation Transition Effects on Haunch Superelevation transitions can create unusual VCO patterns. The typical VCO pattern is a parabolic shape with a maximum at midspan. When there is a superelevation transition that starts or ends in a span the VCLR table of BGS needs to be looked at more closely to determine if the haunch needs to be calculated at points other than midspan. This also applies when a superelevation transition ends at a skewed bent because all the beams not along the PGL will see the same effects as if the superelevation transition was terminated within the span. When the VCO output has an unusual pattern as shown below in Figure 12, the haunch needs to be calculated at multiple points along the beams since the camber and dead load deflection vary along the beam. This means that it is incorrect to calculate the haunch using the critical VCO and the camber and dead load deflection from midspan when the critical VCO does not happen at midspan. When considering quarter points, dead load deflection can be calculated as 0.7123 x DL and camber can be estimated as 0.7123 x C. Figures 13 through 17 give a visual representation of the superelevation transition on the bridge. In general, the use of superelevation transitions increases the haunch in order to prevent encroachment of the beam into the slab. Figure 12. BGS VCLR Table Output for Superelevation Transition Figure 13. Elevation View of a Superelevation Transition 7 of 14

Figure 14. Section A-A (House top cross-slope) Figure 15. Section B-B (Full superelevation) Figure 16. Section C-C 8 of 14

Figure 17. Detail A Example I-Beam Haunch Calculations This bridge consists of 3 TY IV I-beam spans with a crest curve. It has a 2% house top cross slope with no superelevation transition. The layout is shown in Figure 19. The below calculations are shown for Span 2 (115ft) only. Step 1 ~ Execute a preliminary BGS run. As shown in Figure 20, the beam framing option used is 5, the bearing deduct (depth below the reference line) is set to zero, and there is a VCLR card for every span using the bridge alignment. Step 2 ~ Examine BGS output. As shown in Figure 18, the first and last columns of the VCLR table for Span 2 are zero. Also, the VCO values are all negative indicating a crest curve. For these haunch calculations we will be using the VCO at midspan. Figure 18 shows the VCO as -0.19ft for all the beams in the span. Figure 18. BGS VCLR Table Output 9 of 14

Figure 19. Bridge Layout Rev: November 2010 10 of 14

Figure 20. BGS Input 11 of 14

Step 3 ~ Calculate the required minimum haunch at center of bearing at center of beam top flange that will work for all I-Beams in a span. Since all beams have the same VCO, Camber, and Dead Load Deflection, the haunch will be the same for all beams. Using PSTRS 14 (Figure 21) Min. Haunch req d = C + VCO 0.8 DL + CSC + Min. Haunch CL Span C = 0.379ft (From PSTRS14) VCO = -0.19ft (From BGS) DL = 0.1678ft (From PSTRS14) CSC = CS x 0.5w f = 0.02 ft/ft x 0.5(20in/12) = 0.0167ft Min. Hauch CL Span = 0.5in/12 = 0.0417ft Min. Haunch req d = 0.379ft + -0.19ft 0.8(0.1678ft) + 0.0167ft + 0.0417ft = 0.113ft = 1.358in The required haunch at center of bearing is greater than the 1 minimum. (Okay) Rounding the required haunch up to the nearest ¼ gives a haunch for Span 2 of 1.5. Haunch CL Brg = 1.5in Figure 21. PSTRS14 Beam Summary Report 12 of 14

Using PGSuper (Figure 22) Min. Haunch req d = C + VCO 0.8 DL + CSC + Min. Haunch CL Span C = 4.770in = 0.398ft (From PGSuper) VCO = -0.19ft (From BGS) DL = 2.012in = 0.1677ft (From PGSuper) CSC = CS x 0.5w f = 0.02 ft/ft x 0.5(20in/12) = 0.0167ft Min. Hauch CL Span = 0.5in/12 = 0.0417ft Min. Haunch req d = 0.398 + -0.19ft 0.8(0.1677) + 0.0167ft + 0.0417ft = 0.1322ft = 1.587in The required haunch at center of bearing is greater than the 1 minimum. (Okay) Rounding the required haunch up to the nearest ¼ gives a haunch for Span 2 of 1.75. Haunch CL Brg = 1.75in Figure 22. PGSuper, TxDOT Summary Report, Camber and Deflection Table 13 of 14

Step 4 ~ Calculate the haunch at center of span at center of beam top flange. The haunch used for the remaining calculations will be from PSTRS14. Haunch CL Span = Haunch CL Brg C VCO + 0.8 DL CSC Haunch CL Brg = 1.5in = 0.125ft C = 0.379ft VCO = -0.19ft DL = 0.1678ft CSC = 0.0167ft Haunch CL Span = 0.125ft 0.379ft (-0.19ft) + 0.8(0.1678ft) 0.0167ft = 0.0535ft = 0.642in Step 5 ~ Calculate X, Z, and Y. X = Haunch CL Brg + t s Haunch CL Brg = 1.5in t s = 8in X = 1.5in + 8in = 9 ½ Y = X + Beam Depth X = 9.5in Beam Depth = 54in Y = 9.5in + 54in = 63.5in = 5-3 ½ Z = Haunch CL Span + t s + CSC Haunch CL Span = 0.642in t s = 8in CSC = 0.0167ft = 0.200in Z = 0.642in + 8in + 0.200in = 8.842in ~ 8 7 / 8 Step 6 ~ Calculate the required bearing deduct. Bearing Deduct = Y + Bearing Pad Thickness Y = 63.5in Bearing Pad Thickness = 2.75in Bearing Deduct = 63.5in + 2.75in = 66.25in = 5-6 ¼ 14 of 14