WORLD ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR OPERATORS. Performance Indicators

Similar documents
Published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) number 166 of July 10th 2009 [1]

The Safety of Borssele Nuclear Power Station

Nuclear Safety Council Instruction number IS- 23 on in-service inspection at nuclear power plants

British Nuclear Group Reactor Sites Chemistry Issues NuSAC SCR Meeting - April 4 th 2006

NURESAFE EUROPEAN PROJECT Second General Seminar

Monitoring the effectiveness of maintenance programs through the use of performance indicators. Summary Report

Fuel Cycle R&D to Safeguard Advanced Ceramic Fuel Skills Strategic Options

7.1 General Events resulting in pressure increase 5

COMPLIANCE REVIEW OF 2006/07 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN. Top Energy Limited

EDUCATION AND TRAINING OF OPERATORS AND MAINTENANCE STAFF AT COMMERCIAL NUCLEAR POWER STATIONS IN JAPAN

APPENDIX B SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM A. OBJECTIVES AND PHILOSOPHY OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM

COFRENTES NPP. March 14, Iberdrola Generación, SA Producción Nuclear Iberdrola Generación, SA Producción Nuclear 1

Benefits of conducting a Project Management Maturity Assessment with PM Academy:

CSNI Technical Opinion Papers

International Action Plan On The Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

IAEA INTERNATIONAL FACT FINDING EXPERT MISSION OF THE NUCLEAR ACCIDENT FOLLOWING THE GREAT EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI

Government Degree on the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants 717/2013

Nuclear Design Practices and the Case of Loviisa 3

Report WENRA Safety Reference Levels for Existing Reactors - UPDATE IN RELATION TO LESSONS LEARNED FROM TEPCO FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT

A Combined Nuclear Technology and Nuclear Chemistry Master A Unique Initiative at Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden

NNB GENERATION COMPANY LTD

Introductions: Dr. Stephen P. Schultz

Nuclear power plant systems, structures and components and their safety classification. 1 General 3. 2 Safety classes 3. 3 Classification criteria 3

Long term operation integrated processes for delivering extended asset performance

The Inspector General s report. on Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection

8 Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) and Severe Accident Management Guidelines (SAMGs) - Issue 06

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT IN GERMANY - PROCEDURE, DATA, RESULTS -

Office for Nuclear Regulation

OPG READY TO DELIVER REFURBISHMENT OF DARLINGTON NUCLEAR STATION OPG also planning continued operation of Pickering Station

V K Raina. Reactor Group, BARC

Electrical Safety in Oil & Gas Industries Challenges & Solutions for Industrializing Countries

NEI 06-13A [Revision 0] Template for an Industry Training Program Description

Loviisa 3 unique possibility for large scale CHP generation and CO 2 reductions. Nici Bergroth, Fortum Oyj FORS-seminar

PIONEER ROBOT TESTING PROGRAM AND STATUS

HEALTH & SAFETY EXECUTIVE NUCLEAR DIRECTORATE ASSESSMENT REPORT. New Reactor Build. EDF/AREVA EPR Step 2 PSA Assessment

DERBYSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL BUSINESS CONTINUITY POLICY

NNPP Enterprise Overview

Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources

Nuclear Emergency Response Program

REPORT OF THE OPERATIONAL SAFETY REVIEW TEAM (OSART) MISSION TO THE EPZ - BORSSELE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NETHERLANDS

GENERAL REGULATIONS ON ENSURING SAFETY OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS OPB-88/97, NP (PNAE G ) Cover page. Contents

Long Term Operation R&D to Investigate the Technical Basis for Life Extension and License Renewal Decisions

TRANSPORT FOR LONDON SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT ASSURANCE COMMITTEE

Business Continuity Policy. Version 1.0

Liberty Mutual Insurance RISK ENGINEERING PROCEDURE. REP 07 Incident Planning For external use

IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety 1

SMART ASSET MANAGEMENT MAXIMISE VALUE AND RELIABILITY

The Asset Management Landscape

MDEP Generic Common Position No DICWG 02

TECHNICAL MEETING ON IN-PILE TESTING AND INSTRUMENTATION FOR DEVELOPMENT OF GENERATION-IV FUELS AND STRUCTURAL MATERIALS

Decommissioning situation of Nuclear Power Plant in Japan

Dynamic Behavior of BWR

Strategic Alliance. Business Continuity Policy

RC-17. Alejandro V. Nader National Regulatory Authority Montevideo - Uruguay

Proud to be here, since 1853

. Space-time Analysis code for AHWR

Report. November 2013

AP1000 European 18. Human Factors Engineering Design Control Document

Strengthening Technical Specialist Training for an Expanding Nuclear Power Programme in the UK

Jonathan Wilson. Sector Manager (Health & Safety)

CFD Topics at the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Christopher Boyd, Ghani Zigh Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research June 2008

Draft IAEA Action Plan on Nuclear Safety

Nuclear Energy: Nuclear Energy

REPORT OF THE OPERATIONAL SAFETY REVIEW TEAM (OSART) MISSION TO THE MUHLEBERG NUCLEAR POWER PLANT (SWITZERLAND) 8-25 OCTOBER 2012

Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control in MEXICO

Development Study of Nuclear Power Plants for the 21st Century

NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1. Renewed License No. NPF-63

Office Of Nuclear Energy Sensors and Instrumentation Annual Review Meeting

Job Description. Empty Homes Project Officer

IAEA-TECDOC Assuring the competence of nuclear power plant contractor personnel

Managing contractors involved in high impact activities

REPORT 4 FOR DECISION. This report will be considered in public

Belgian Stress tests specifications Applicable to power reactors 17 May 2011


ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEGREE. List of subjects available for 2014/2015 SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING / ESCUELA DE INGENIERÍA INDUSTRIAL UNIVERSITY OF VIGO

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS

Risk Management. National Occupational Standards February 2014

Executive Director for Operations AUDIT OF NRC S CYBER SECURITY INSPECTION PROGRAM FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (OIG-14-A-15)

Musgrave Energy & Natural Resources Management Policy. Working together to deliver sustainability

May 23, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Nuclear Development. Decommissioning. Nuclear Power Plants. Policies, Strategies and Costs

Spent Fuel Project Office Interim Staff Guidance - 17 Interim Storage of Greater Than Class C Waste

Enclosure 3. Reactor Oversight Process Task Force FAQ Log March 18, 2015

PROMG4 Install mining backup services

Transcription:

WORLD ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR OPERATORS Performance Indicators

WANO Vision: WANO and its members will be... Among its continuing efforts to improve worldwide nuclear safety performance, WANO has announced long-term performance targets for selected performance indicators. The targets for forced loss rate, collective radiation exposure, safety accident rate and safety system performance were established for individual plants or units, and for the overall industry. The values were selected to be challenging and achievable by 2. The table below indicates the percentage of plants or units achieving those targets. Worldwide Status Key Indicator (Reactor types combined for applicable indicators) Percentage of Plants/Units Achieving Individual Target (Objective: 1%) LONG-TERM TARGET PERFORMANCE TABLES Percentage of Plants/Units Achieving Higher than 27 Median Values (Objective: 75%) Percentage of Plant/Unit Safety Systems Demonstrating Indicator Stability or Improvement (Objective: 1%) Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) 88.3% 71.9% Forced Loss Rate (FLR) 84.7% 55.9% Industrial Safety Accident Rate (ISA) 85.4% 72.% Safety System Performance (SSPI) 98.2% 63.5% Results through Q4 Unplanned Automatic Scrams per 7, Hours Critical (UA7) Unplanned Automatic Scrams per 7, Hours Critical, per unit The unplanned automatic scrams per 7, hours critical indicator (UA7) tracks the mean scram (automatic shutdown) rate for approximately one year (7, hours) of operation. Unplanned automatic scrams result in thermal and hydraulic transients that affect plant systems. (See Note 1.) 2. 1. 1.8 1..56.59.51.56.46.5.49.5 Reporting 369 44 417 425 425 49 371 38 Industrial Safety Accident Rate (ISA) The industrial safety accident rate tracks the number of accidents among employees that result in lost work time, restricted work, or fatalities per 2, hours worked (and 1,, hours worked). The nuclear industry continues to provide one of the safest industrial work environments. Number per 2, hours worked / Number per 1,, hours worked, per plant 1.2 1..8.6 1.4 5.2.58 2.9.33 1.63.26 1.3.17.85..74.14.68.12.62.13.63 6. 5. 4. 3..4 2..2 1. 199 1995 2 25 Stations 169 192 23 28 Reporting 217 211 195 196 198

...worldwide leaders in pursuing excellence in operational... Collective Radiation Exposure (CRE) Collective Radiation Exposure (BWRs) The collective radiation exposure indicator monitors the effectiveness of personnel radiation exposure controls for boiling water reactors (BWRs), pressurised water reactors (PWRs), pressurised heavy water reactors (PHWRs), lightwater-cooled graphite reactors (LWCGRs), and gas-cooled reactors (AGRs and GCRs). Low exposure indicates strong management attention to radiological protection. 3. 2.5 2. 2.76 276 7 7 1.26 126 1.36 136.91 91.77 77.79 79.98 98 1.6 16 3 25 2 1. 1.5 5 Reporting 81 88 9 9 92 78 Collective Radiation Exposure (PWRs) Collective Radiation Exposure (PHWRs) 2. 1.74 174 1.37 137.85 85.65 65.54 54.54 54.49 49.36 36.4 4 2 2. 1.13 113 1. 1 1. 1 2 2.6 6.62 62.58 58.58 58.49 49 2 1. 1 1. 1.5 5.5 5 Reporting 218 24 25 26 265 266 244 247 248 Reporting 26 26 28 37 45 46 44 46 46 Collective Radiation Exposure (LWCGRs) Collective Radiation Exposure (AGRs & GCRs) 8 4.59 459 7.37 737 5.35 535.86 86 2.68 268 2.74 274 2.26 226 2.79 279 2.75 275 8.6..23 23.1 1 5 4.6 2 2.4 2 2.1 2 1.9 2 1.96 2 2. 6 7 6 7 6.5 5 5 5.4 4 4 4.3 3 3 2 3 2.2 2 1 1.1 1 Reporting 1 19 17 16 Units 199 Reporting 37 1995 35 2 32 25 22 18 17

...nuclear safety for commercial nuclear power. Unit Capability Factor (UCF) Unit Capability Factor (%) Unit capability factor is the percentage of maximum energy generation that a unit is capable of supplying to the electrical grid, limited only by factors within the control of plant management. A high unit capability factor indicates effective plant programmes and practices to minimise unplanned energy losses and to optimise planned outages. 1 8 6 4 77.2 8 85.9 86.8 86.3 87.1 86.8 87. 87.45 2 Reporting 373 41 42 429 436 423 377 383 Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (UCLF) Unplanned Capability Loss Factor (%) The unplanned capability loss factor is the percentage of maximum energy generation that a unit is not capable of supplying to the electrical grid because of unplanned energy losses, such as unplanned shutdowns or outage extensions. A low value indicates important unit equipment is well maintained and reliably operated and there are few outage extensions. 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 3.7 2.7 1.4 1.6 2.1 1.8 2. 2.1 1.68 1..5 Units 199 Reporting 373 1995 41 2 42 25 429 436 423 377 383 Forced Loss Rate (FLR) Forced Loss Rate (%) The forced loss rate is the percentage of energy generation during non-outage periods that a unit is not capable of supplying to the electrical grid because of unplanned energy losses, such as unplanned shutdown or load reductions. A low value indicates important unit equipment is well maintained and reliably operated. (See Note 3.) 1.2.9.6 1.2.9 1.1 1.2.89.3 Reporting 426 428 4 374

WANO monitors six additional performance indicators: safety system performance, chemistry performance, fuel reliability, gridrelated loss factor, unplanned total scrams per 7, hours critical and contractor industrial safety accident rate. The first three indicators are defined in a manner that reflects differences in plant-specific designs, configurations, or operational practices. As a result, data for these three indicators cannot be summarised across reactor types for inclusion in this report. Additionally, gridrelated loss factor is out of plant management control. Contractor industrial safety accident rate and unplanned total scrams per 7, hours critical are not plotted because data has not been collected for these indicators long enough to show a significant trend over time. These indicators are available to WANO members in more detailed reports on the WANO member website. Safety System Performance (SSPI) The safety system performance indicator monitors the availability of three important standby safety systems at each plant. Safety systems that are maintained in a high state of readiness have a high probability of being capable of mitigating off-normal events. Chemistry Performance (CPI) The chemistry performance indicator provides an indication of progress in controlling chemical parameters to retard deterioration of key plant materials and components. These parameters are to be maintained within strict guidance developed by the industry. Fuel Reliability (FRI) The fuel reliability indicator monitors progress in preventing defects in the metal cladding that surrounds fuel. Maintenance of fuel cladding integrity reduces radiological impact on plant operations and maintenance activities. Grid-Related Loss Factor (GRLF) The grid-related loss factor is the percentage of maximum energy generation that a plant could not supply due to grid issues not under plant management control. Unplanned Total Scrams per 7, Hours Critical (US7) The unplanned total scrams per 7, hours critical monitors the number of unplanned reactor shutdowns for approximately one year (7, hours) of operation. Unplanned scrams result in thermal and hydraulic transients that affect plant systems. This indicator was introduced in. Contractor Industrial Safety Accident Rate (CISA) The contractor industrial safety accident rate tracks the number of accidents among contractors that result in lost work time, restricted work, or fatalities per 2, workhours (and 1,, hours worked). The WANO Performance Indicator Programme supports the exchange of operating experience information by collecting, trending and disseminating nuclear plant performance data in 12 key areas. The data is gathered for a set of quantitative indicators of plant performance. These indicators are intended principally for use as a management tool by nuclear operating organisations to monitor their own performance and progress, to set their own challenging goals for improvement, and to gain additional perspective on performance relative to that of other plants. It is now widely recognised that a good set of overall performance indicators can provide a partial, but important and useful, measure of how well a nuclear plant is managed overall. WANO published and distributed the first performance indicator report in April 1991. In 1993, reporting of data began for all reactor designs. Currently, more than 98% of the operating nuclear power plants report all indicators. It is expected that the use of WANO performance indicators will encourage emulation of the best industry performance. It should also further motivate the identification and exchange of good practices in nuclear plant operations. Notes: 1. The median values are displayed for all indicators except unplanned automatic scrams per 7, hours critical (UA7), where the mean values are shown, and industrial safety accident rate, which is an overall industry value. 2. Half of the values are above and half are below the displayed median values. The mean is the arithmetical average of the values. The median value is normally displayed rather than the mean value because the median value is less susceptible to influence of outliers and is therefore more representative of overall performance. 3. Worldwide collection of data needed to calculate the forced loss rate indicator did not begin until 21. 4. Charts are based on performance indicator results obtained 24 March 2. Cover image: Bohunice Nuclear Power Plant

World Association of Nuclear Operators WANO London Level 35, 25 Canada Square Canary Wharf London, E14 5LQ UNITED KINGDOM www.wano.org & www.wano.info Our Mission To maximise the safety and reliability of nuclear power plants worldwide by working together to assess, benchmark and improve performance through mutual support, exchange of information, and emulation of best practices.