primefacts Yield and digestibility of legume and oat forages Dr Brian Dear Principal Research Scientist



Similar documents
Economic and environmental analysis of the introduction of legumes in livestock farming systems

ennessee is one of the top livestock producing states in the country. Much of the livestock in Tennessee is raised by smaller-scale, parttime

Endophytes of perennial ryegrass and tall fescue

Managing of Annual Winter Forages in Southwest Texas

Annual Winter Pastures for East Texas

Supplementation guide for sheep: Central and southern NSW

PUTTING FORAGES TOGETHER FOR YEAR ROUND GRAZING

suscon Green One application. 3 years control against grass grub. Grass grub damaged pasture

MANAGEMENT OF MEADOW FESCUE PASTURE FOR HIGH-PRODUCING DAIRY COWS IN NORTHERN JAPAN

Improve and protect your soil

Forage Sorghum Production Guide

MIDAS Insights on Profitably utilising Perennial Plants in Hamilton, Victoria.

Using French serradella to increase crop and livestock production

SCHEDULE C FORAGE PRODUCTION PLAN

SOIL HEALTH COVER CROPS RELAY CROPPING

Grass Legume Mixtures:

Can Grazing Make Organic No-Till Possible?

The Potash Development Association Potash for Cereals

College of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural Research and Cooperative Extension

Farming at dairy farms (produktion på mælkelandbrug)

USING HUMIC COMPOUNDS TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY OF FERTILISER NITROGEN

The Ultimate Guide to Pigeon Feed

GRAZING AND FIRE MANAGEMENT FOR NATIVE PERENNIAL GRASS RESTORATION IN CALIFORNIA GRASSLANDS

Selwyn Te Waihora Nutrient Performance and Financial Analysis Prepared for: Irrigation NZ and ECan Prepared by: The AgriBusiness Group December 2012

A Look at Five Green Manures for Tropical Farm Systems by: Kristin Hettich

Management of goats at pasture. Barry W Norton School of Land and Food, University of Queensland, Australia

The ABCs of Pasture Grazing

PRELIMINARY FOCUS GROUP STUDY: AUSTRALIAN FARMER ATTITUDE TO ON-FARM RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE

Full hand feeding of beef cattle quantities

Crop rotation and legumes cultivation: Effective measures to increase the environmental performance and long-term viability of European agriculture.

Animal Science Research Centre - Beef Unit Trial Results 2005 (a) Evaluation of head-cut whole crop wheat and barley for beef cattle

Number 389 February 15, 2013

Estimating Cash Rental Rates for Farmland

Hybrid Rye for Biogas Trial Results 2012/13 KWS UK

CROPS COSTS AND RETURNS 2014

African Organic Agriculture Manual Booklet Series No. 4 Soil organic matter management HOW DO I IMPROVE THE SOIL ORGANIC MATTER?

What is Nitrite Toxicity? Georgia Cattleman, June 2002 John Andrae, Forage Extension Specialist

Growth of Pasture Plants

Supplementary information on the Irish Dairy sector in support of

CANADA-MANITOBA. AgriInsurance. AgriInsurance Contract (EFFECTIVE 2014 CROP YEAR)

6. JOINING MANAGEMENT

Notes on Managing Phosphorus losses

Farming. In the Standard Grade Geography exam there are three types of farming you need to know about arable, livestock and mixed.

Total Income from Farming in the United Kingdom. First estimate for 2015

Best practice guidelines for using poultry litter on pastures

A Review of Factors Affecting Carbohydrate Levels in Forage. Kathryn A. Watts, B.S., N. Jerry Chatterton, Ph. D.

Everything you need to know about the practical coursework assessment

Radishes as biofumigants and weed suppressant cover crops. Joel Gruver Western Illinois University

How To Feed Cows In The Winter

PASTURE AND HAY INSECT MANAGEMENT

An Arvum Group Company SEED TECHNOLOGY MAIZE GUIDE 2013 SUPPORTING FARM INCOME WITH BETTER VARIETIES

To complete the organization for all agricultural activities MARO has daughter companies such as

Forage Economics, page2. Production Costs

Fayette County Appraisal District

Understanding the. Soil Test Report. Client and Sample Identification

THE KILL DATE AS A MANAGEMENT TOOL TO INCREASE COVER CROPS BENEFITS IN WATER QUALITY & NITROGEN RECYCLING

Introduction. Introduction Nutritional Requirements. Six Major Classes of Nutrients. Water 12/1/2011. Regional Hay School -- Bolivar, MO 1

Business Planning for the Allocation of Milk Quota to New Entrants

Agricultural Production and Research in Heilongjiang Province, China. Jiang Enchen. Professor, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Northeast

ImpRovIng and SuStaInIng FoRage production In pastures S RC n

Nutrient and Fertilizer Value of Dairy Manure

Grass and White Clover. Recommended List Varieties for Ireland 2015

Feeding Dairy Cows. A manual for use in the Target 10 Nutrition Program. Edited by Joe Jacobs with Ann Hargreaves. Third Edition

IMPORTANCE OF LONG-TERM EXPERIMENTS IN STUDYING THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE. Introduction

Farm-Scale Anaerobic Digestion Plant Efficiency

Research Article A high yielding Lucerne variety CO 2

Academic Offerings. Agriculture

Reducing methane emissions through improved lamb production

Management Strategies for Rangeland and Introduced Pastures

Characterization of Pasture- Based Dairy Farms in Florida and Georgia

Advanced Soil Organic Matter Management

Cover crops as a soil improvement strategy

Humidtropics Kiboga/Kyankwanzi Soybean production training

You d be mad not to bet on this horse.

The economic value of pasture phases in the integrated management of annual ryegrass and wild radish in a Western Australian farming system

Grouping to Increase Milk Yield and Decrease Feed Costs

Understanding Feed Analysis Terminology

R E S T R I C T E D B R E E D I N G A N D R O T A T I O N A L G R A Z I N G

SHANGHAI: TRENDS TOWARDS SPECIALISED AND CAPITAL-INTENSIVE URBAN AGRICULTURE

Energybeet for Biogas. Simon Witheford & Steffi Eggers

Report on the AgriProFocus Zambia Dairy Learning Lab conducted by PUM Netherlands Senior Experts.

USE OF OVERSEER AS A TOOL TO IDENTIFY MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING NITRATE LEACHING FROM FARMS AROUND LAKE TAUPO

Precision Farming in Practice

Created by the industry, for the industry. Feed planning for cattle and sheep

External Diploma handbook. Agriculture

NUTRIENT SPECIFICATIONS OF TURKEY WASTE MATERIAL

Protein and Energy Supplementation to Beef Cows Grazing New Mexico Rangelands

Science of Life Explorations

Plant Genetic Resources Green sources of plant protein

San Jacinto County Appraisal District PO Box 1170 Coldspring, Texas (Fax)

Introduction to the Pasture Renewal Spreadsheet

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT IMPACTS ON WHEAT YIELD AND PROTEIN. Steve Orloff, Steve Wright and Mike Ottman 1 ABSTRACT

Usual Planting and Harvesting Dates for U.S. Field Crops

BEC Feed Solutions. Steve Blake BEC Feed Solutions

Full hand feeding of beef cattle management

Selenium deficiency in sheep

Estimated Costs of Crop. Production in Iowa File A1-20 The estimated costs of corn, corn silage, Ag Decision Maker

OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT SPECIAL PROGRAMMES ARID LANDS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PROJECT II

Level II Agricultural Business Operations - Assessment Booklet

FORAGE NEEDS, GRAZING MANAGEMENT AND FEEDING PROGRAM FOR MEAT GOATS AND SHEEP IN THE HUMID SOUTHEAST

Transcription:

N S W D P I primefacts P R O F I T A B L E & S U S T A I N A B L E P R I M A R Y I N D U S T R I E S w w w. d p i. n s w. g o v. a u N O V E M B E R 2 0 0 5 P R I M E F A C T 5 2 Yield and digestibility of legume and oat forages Dr Brian Dear Principal Research Scientist Dr Alan Kaiser Special Livestock Officer Mr John Piltz National Coordinator, Top Fodder Silage Agricultural Institute, Wagga Wagga, NSW I N T R O D U C T I O N Pasture and grain legumes can be sown to produce high yielding forage crops which are later conserved in spring as either silage or hay. The species selected and the timing of the cut will have a large influence on both the yield and quality of the conserved fodder. The quality of conserved fodder is determined by the inherent quality of the pasture or crop at the time of harvest and the efficiency of the conservation process. The quality of the forage is mostly affected by the plant species and plant maturity at the time of harvest. Typically forage quality declines as plants progress from the vegetative stage through the reproductive stages whereas forage yield increases till after anthesis (flowering). The data provided in this report describes the change in yield and quality of a large range of legume species, oats and ryegrass cut at three different stages of maturity. Values are provided for both pure swards and mixtures of legumes and oats or ryegrass. S P E C I E S CO M B I N AT I O N S AND CUT T I N G T I M E S Ten different species of legume were grown at Wagga Wagga, either alone or in combination with oats or ryegrass, to simulate forage crops. The oats was added to provide a climbing frame for the legumes and to increase the bulk of feed produced. The species, cultivars and sowing rates used in the study are described in Table 1. The oat variety Kalgan was selected for use in mixtures due to its short stature and strong stems to resist lodging in comparison to the variety Cooba which is a more vigorous grazing grain dual purpose oat variety more likely to compete strongly with the legumes. The three cutting times in spring were selected to coincide with typical cutting times for making either early silage (2 October), late silage (23 October) or hay cut (6 November) in southern New South Wales. The early cut corresponds to the booting stage in oats, the second cutting time to the anthesis stage and the final or late cut to the milk stage in oats. The legume sowing rates selected were based on best knowledge at the time of the experiment. Increasing the seeding rate is likely to increase early winter spring forage production but is less likely to increase yields in late spring. There is little information on which to base oat sowing rates when used in mixtures with legumes. The 40 kg/ha rate used was in retrospect too high and lower rates around 25 kg/ha may give a better proportion of legume and oats in the harvested forage. Farmers wanting a legume dominant forage would need to further lower the oat seeding rate to no more than 15 kg/ha.

Table 1. Species, cultivars and sowing rates Species Cultivar Sowing rate (kg/ha) Sowing rate alone Sowing rate in combination Oats high N Kalgan 80 - high N Cooba 80 - low N Kalgan 80 40 Ryegrass high N Richmond 10 - low N Richmond 10 5 Berseem clover Big Bee 15 10 Sub clover Clare 15 10 Sub clover Karridale 15 10 Balansa clover Paradana 10 6.7 Arrowleaf clover Seelu 10 6.7 Murex medic Zodiac 15 10 Barrel medic Sephi 15 10 Purple vetch Popany 45 30 Common vetch Golden Tares 45 30 Field peas Dundale 100 66.7 Table 2. Yield of forage crops harvested at three stages of growth, early (2 October), mid season (23 October) and late (6 November). Values are adjusted for a mean legume content of 30% in all oat legume mixtures and 90% legume in legume monocultures. Forage Dry matter yield (t/ha) Cut 2 Oct. Cut 23 Oct. Cut 6 Nov. Pure forages Kalgan oats high N 7.33 12.17 13.43 Cooba oats high N 4.94 12.61 17.68 Kalgan oats low N 6.34 9.83 10.52 Ryegrass high N 7.70 11.20 8.51 low N 6.06 8.95 9.86 Berseem clover 3.86 7.45 5.39 Clare sub clover 3.98 5.56 5.97 Karridale sub clover 4.83 6.16 6.60 Balansa clover 5.74 6.52 6.17 Arrowleaf clover 4.71 7.47 7.34 Murex medic 4.87 8.77 7.82 Barrel medic* 3.67 3.67 3.76 Purple vetch 6.24 9.89 8.68 Common vetch 5.64 6.81 6.64 Field peas 6.86 11.58 12.28 Mixtures Oats**/Berseem clover 5.96 10.89 13.20 Oats/Clare sub clover 5.76 11.11 9.84 Oats/Karridale sub clover 7.13 10.36 8.30 Oats/Balansa clover 6.84 11.20 9.14 Oats/Arrowleaf clover 6.81 9.34 8.79 Oats/Murex medic 6.73 9.41 10.55 Oats/Barrel medic 7.70 8.97 8.60 Oats/Purple vetch 8.45 15.17 11.00 Oats/Common vetch 6.96 13.27 13.37 Oats/Field peas 9.48 14.68 12.71 Ryegrass/Berseem clover 5.75 8.31 8.24 Ryegrass/Clare sub clover 5.79 8.86 8.28 Ryegrass/Common vetch 6.97 10.62 9.84 * Barrel medic was not suited to this soil type. **Kalgan oats was sown in all legume mixtures. 2 P R I M E F A C T 5 2, Y I E L D A N D D I G E S T I B I L I T Y O F L E G U M E A N D O A T F O R A G E S

20 18 16 Cooba oats Oats + arrow leaf clover Arrow leaf clover oats + purple vetch Forage yield (t DM/ha) 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Arrowleaf clover is a high yielding annual legume capable of producing 7 to 9 tonnes dry matter/ha when sown in early autumn. Nitrogen fertiliser was added at two rates to the pure oat and ryegrass treatments but not to the legumes. All forages were sown on 29 May. This sowing time was optimum for peas and vetches but late for small seeded pasture legumes. In vitro digestibility (%) 0 85 80 75 70 65 60 2nd Oct 23rd Oct 6th Nov Time of cut Cooba oats Oats + arrow leaf clover Arrow leaf clover Oats + purple vetch F O R AG E YI E L D S 55 The yields of particular forages will vary with seasonal conditions, soil type, drainage and location. The yields in Table 2 give a guide to expected yields at Wagga Wagga under average rainfall conditions. Legume species and cultivars should be chosen which are known to yield well on the soil type where the forage will be grown. 50 25 20 2nd Oct 23rd Oct 6th Nov Time of cut Cooba oats Oats + arrow leaf clover Arrow leaf clover Oats + purple vetch Yields of most species generally increase with time up to anthesis, after which yields either level off or decline due to increased losses from shading and respiration. In the year of the experiment, growing conditions were curtailed in spring due to dry conditions. Some forages, such as pasture legumes, can be grazed over winter before being closed up for forage harvesting later in spring. Other forages, such as peas and vetches, do not recover well from grazing and are best left ungrazed until cut for forage. Crude protein (%) 15 10 5 0 2nd Oct 23rd Oct 6th Nov Time of cut Small seeded pasture legumes are likely to perform best when sown in early autumn. If sowing is delayed until June, either because of seasonal conditions or the need for weed control, larger seeded legumes such as peas and vetch may be more suitable. Figure 1. The changes in yield, digestibility and crude protein during spring in oats, legumes and oat legume mixtures. Growing legumes with oats increases the digestibility and crude protein of the forage compared to pure oats but total forage yield is likely to be less. P R I M E F A C T 5 2, Y I E L D A N D D I G E S T I B I L I T Y O F L E G U M E A N D O A T F O R A G E S 3

Table 3. Digestibility of forage crops harvested at three stages of growth, early (2 October), mid season (23 October) and late (6 November). Values are adjusted for a mean legume content of 30% in all oat legume mixtures and 90% legume in legume monocultures. Forage In vitro organic matter digestibility ( % ) Cut 2 Oct. Cut 23 Oct. Cut 6 Nov. Pure forages Kalgan oats high N 70 64 56 Cooba oats high N 65 62 55 Kalgan oats low N 71 61 59 Ryegrass high N 75 60 49 low N 73 64 65 Berseem clover 77 69 65 Clare sub clover 79 73 69 Karridale sub clover 76 72 69 Balansa clover 83 72 65 Arrowleaf clover 79 73 66 Murex medic 77 70 57 Barrel medic 78 71 55 Purple vetch 71 68 63 Common vetch 74 68 61 Field peas 71 72 69 Mixtures Oats/Berseem clover 69 61 58 Oats/Clare sub clover 77 68 61 Oats/Karridale sub clover 73 68 61 Oats/Balansa clover 75 65 59 Oats/Arrowleaf clover 72 65 59 Oats/Murex medic 74 66 55 Oats/Barrel medic 73 66 59 Oats/Purple vetch 71 64 54 Oats/Common vetch 72 61 56 Oats/Field peas 74 66 59 Ryegrass/Berseem clover 73 66 58 Ryegrass/Clare sub clover 76 63 56 Ryegrass/Common vetch 74 62 56 F O R AG E QUA L I T Y The quality of most forage species progressively declines as plants mature from the vegetative stage through the reproductive stages and this is reflected in the digestibility values in Table 3. All the pure legume forages produced relatively high digestibility values compared to oats. Oat legume mixtures generally had higher digestibility values than pure oats. A 1% increase in diet digestibility can result in a 3 to 5% increase in liveweight gain for young growing livestock. In production feeding where maximising liveweight gain is a priority, pure legumes may have an advantage over oat legume mixtures. C R U D E P R OT E I N CO N T E N T The crude protein values of oats and ryegrass were typically very low compared to the pure legumes or legume oat mixtures (Table 4). Low protein levels in cereal forage is not uncommon and highlights the need to have cereal forages tested for protein to check whether a protein supplement is required. Adding nitrogen fertiliser did little to increase the N content of oats. The crude protein levels of most forages declined over time. CO N C LU S I O N S The maximum yield was reached in most cases by the second cut corresponding to a cut around 23 October. Delaying cutting beyond this time 4 P R I M E F A C T 5 2, Y I E L D A N D D I G E S T I B I L I T Y O F L E G U M E A N D O A T F O R A G E S

Table 4. Crude protein (%) of forage crops harvested at three stages of growth: early (2 October), mid season (23 October) and late (6 November). Values are adjusted for a mean legume content of 30% in all oat legume mixtures and 90% legume in legume monocultures. Forage Crude protein (%) Cut 2 Oct. Cut 23 Oct. Cut 6 Nov. Pure forages Kalgan oats high N 7.5 4.5 4.5 Cooba oats high N 7.8 4.2 4.5 Kalgan oats low N 5.8 3.9 4.3 Ryegrass high N 5.8 5.5 3.4 low N 6.3 4.3 4.1 Berseem clover 18.3 13.1 14.1 Clare sub clover 20.5 15.1 11.2 Karridale sub clover 19.8 13.3 11.8 Balansa clover 16.7 13.6 10.8 Arrowleaf clover 20.6 15.2 12.4 Murex medic 21.9 13.8 12.4 Barrel medic 20.0 15.5 12.7 Purple vetch 25.1 20.3 18.9 Common vetch 20.8 22.3 16.9 Field peas 17.3 16.8 14.8 Mixtures Oats/Berseem clover 9.3 6.9 5.4 Oats/Clare sub clover 9.1 6.8 6.0 Oats/Karridale sub clover 10.5 7.9 6.3 Oats/Balansa clover 7.5 4.5 5.9 Oats/Arrowleaf clover 9.8 7.3 6.9 Oats/Murex medic 10.2 6.4 6.6 Oats/Barrel medic 8.4 7.3 6.6 Oats/Purple vetch 9.5 8.1 8.1 Oats/Common vetch 11.8 7.9 6.4 Oats/Field peas 11.0 9.4 6.9 Ryegrass/Berseem clover 10.8 8.7 8.6 Ryegrass/Clare sub clover 11.1 8.4 5.4 Ryegrass/common vetch 13.0 8.3 8.9 often resulted in lower yields due to losses from respiration as result of shading or senescence. The quality of the conserved material generally declined with time. The only exceptions to this were vetch and field peas where quality remained relatively high at all 3 cutting times. The nitrogen content of oats and ryegrass was low at all harvest times and did not increase greatly with applied nitrogen. If silage or hay produced from these crops comprised a major component of the diet, supplementary protein would be required to sustain growth and lactation in cattle and sheep. Pure legumes were generally lower yielding than oats. Adding oats to legumes increased the total forage yield. Pure legumes had a higher digestibility and protein content than oats. Growing legumes in mixtures with oats increased the digestibility and protein content of the harvested forage compared to pure oat crops. The crop grain legumes (vetches and peas) are a good option when sowing late (late May June) due to seasonal conditions or to allow an extended period of weed control. However, they are only suited to a single cut or grazing and are best sown with oats, as alone they are likely to lodge predisposing them to disease and loss of herbage quality. Some legumes such as balansa clover can be harder to wilt due to their hollow stems, significantly extending the time required between cutting and baling. Mechanical P R I M E F A C T 5 2, Y I E L D A N D D I G E S T I B I L I T Y O F L E G U M E A N D O A T F O R A G E S 5

conditioning and tedding can be used to speed up wilting rates. Consult the Successful Silage book (see further reading) or www.topfodder. com.au for details on silage making. Where the aim is to produce the highest quality forage for finishing livestock, pure legumes harvested earlier would produce the highest quality forage. As legumes have lower water soluble content values than grasses or cereals and therefore produce a poor fermentation, field wilting is essential to ensure good preservation. Where a higher yield of intermediate quality forage is required, an oat/legume mixture harvested in late October would be the better option as it produces a greater bulk of good quality feed. Based on the yield and estimated ME data, an oat crop cut at the boot stage (first harvest) for silage would support a liveweight gain in young cattle of 732 kg/ha when fed as the sole diet. A crop legume oat crop harvested for silage when the oat component is at anthesis (second harvest) would support a liveweight gain of 1497 kg/ha. The sowing rate of oats used in the mixture will influence the proportion of legume and oats in the harvested forage. Higher rates of oats will increase total forage yield but at the expense of legume content and forage quality. Oat cultivars with a high propensity to tiller should be sown at lower rates if they are not to dominate the legumes. An oat sowing rate of around 15 kg/ha may give a more balanced proportion of legume and oats than the 40 kg/ha used in these studies. Sowing time and grazing management prior to harvesting oat legume mixtures will affect the likelihood of the oats dominating oat legume mixtures. Some legumes, such as Persian and berseem clover, are later maturing and offer the prospect of significant regrowth in late spring following the forage harvesting, providing seasonal conditions allow. It is possible to sow several legumes together in mixtures referred to as high density legume (HDL) mixtures. These can be grazed before being closed up for forage harvesting. Typical mixtures include a 3 way mix of berseem clover at 6 8 kg/ha, arrowleaf clover at 2 4 kg/ha and Persian clover at 3 4 kg/ha. Legumes such as balansa clover or sub clover can be substituted for the Persian clover depending on soil type and seed prices. Sub clover is more likely to regenerate in the following year than aerial seeding legumes although legumes capable of significant regrowth after cutting, such as berseem or Persian clover, may produce sufficient seed to regenerate. F U R T H E R R E A D I N G Condon, K (2000) Forage legumes profitable break crops for dryland cropping rotations. NSW Agriculture, Orange. Kaiser AG, Piltz JW, Burns HM, Griffiths NW (2004) Successful Silage. NSW Department of Primary Industries and Dairy Australia. Orange. Online silage making guide: www.topfodder.com.au D I S C L A I M E R The information contained in this publication is based on knowledge and understanding at the time of writing, November 2005. However, because of advances in knowledge, users are reminded of the need to ensure that information upon which they rely is up to date and to check currency of the information with the appropriate officer of New South Wales Department of Primary Industries or the user s independent adviser. WA R N I N G S Pasture improvement may be associated with an increase in the incidence of certain livestock health disorders. Livestock and production losses from some disorders are possible. Management may need to be modified to minimise risk. Consult your veterinarian or adviser when planning pasture improvement. Legislation covering conservation of native vegetation may regulate some pasture improvement practices where existing pasture contains native species. Inquire through your office of the Department of Natural Resources for further information. The State of New South Wales 2005 ISSN 1832-6668 Job number 6124 6 P R I M E F A C T 5 2, Y I E L D A N D D I G E S T I B I L I T Y O F L E G U M E A N D O A T F O R A G E S