Lecture 4: Cheeger s Inequality



Similar documents
FIBONACCI NUMBERS: AN APPLICATION OF LINEAR ALGEBRA. 1. Powers of a matrix

Properties of MLE: consistency, asymptotic normality. Fisher information.

Lecture 3. denote the orthogonal complement of S k. Then. 1 x S k. n. 2 x T Ax = ( ) λ x. with x = 1, we have. i = λ k x 2 = λ k.

U.C. Berkeley CS270: Algorithms Lecture 9 Professor Vazirani and Professor Rao Last revised. Lecture 9

Approximating Area under a curve with rectangles. To find the area under a curve we approximate the area using rectangles and then use limits to find

Lecture 4: Cauchy sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and the Squeeze theorem

Maximum Likelihood Estimators.

Convexity, Inequalities, and Norms

In nite Sequences. Dr. Philippe B. Laval Kennesaw State University. October 9, 2008

Chapter 5: Inner Product Spaces

Chapter 6: Variance, the law of large numbers and the Monte-Carlo method


Lecture 5: Span, linear independence, bases, and dimension

Math C067 Sampling Distributions

CME 302: NUMERICAL LINEAR ALGEBRA FALL 2005/06 LECTURE 8

CS103X: Discrete Structures Homework 4 Solutions

Example 2 Find the square root of 0. The only square root of 0 is 0 (since 0 is not positive or negative, so those choices don t exist here).

Overview of some probability distributions.

1. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION

Department of Computer Science, University of Otago

SAMPLE QUESTIONS FOR FINAL EXAM. (1) (2) (3) (4) Find the following using the definition of the Riemann integral: (2x + 1)dx

5 Boolean Decision Trees (February 11)

Asymptotic Growth of Functions

Infinite Sequences and Series

I. Chi-squared Distributions

Section 8.3 : De Moivre s Theorem and Applications

SECTION 1.5 : SUMMATION NOTATION + WORK WITH SEQUENCES

Sequences and Series

THE REGRESSION MODEL IN MATRIX FORM. For simple linear regression, meaning one predictor, the model is. for i = 1, 2, 3,, n

Confidence Intervals for One Mean

Sampling Distribution And Central Limit Theorem

ON AN INTEGRAL OPERATOR WHICH PRESERVE THE UNIVALENCE

Trigonometric Form of a Complex Number. The Complex Plane. axis. ( 2, 1) or 2 i FIGURE The absolute value of the complex number z a bi is

A probabilistic proof of a binomial identity

Conductance, the Normalized Laplacian, and Cheeger s Inequality

Your organization has a Class B IP address of Before you implement subnetting, the Network ID and Host ID are divided as follows:

Week 3 Conditional probabilities, Bayes formula, WEEK 3 page 1 Expected value of a random variable

4.3. The Integral and Comparison Tests

, a Wishart distribution with n -1 degrees of freedom and scale matrix.

How To Solve The Homewor Problem Beautifully

3. Greatest Common Divisor - Least Common Multiple

Measures of Spread and Boxplots Discrete Math, Section 9.4

Hypothesis testing. Null and alternative hypotheses

UC Berkeley Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. EE 126: Probablity and Random Processes. Solutions 9 Spring 2006

1 Computing the Standard Deviation of Sample Means

BINOMIAL EXPANSIONS In this section. Some Examples. Obtaining the Coefficients

Math 113 HW #11 Solutions

Theorems About Power Series

Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2014 Anant Sahai Note 13

Soving Recurrence Relations

THE ABRACADABRA PROBLEM

University of California, Los Angeles Department of Statistics. Distributions related to the normal distribution

Here are a couple of warnings to my students who may be here to get a copy of what happened on a day that you missed.

GCSE STATISTICS. 4) How to calculate the range: The difference between the biggest number and the smallest number.

Section 11.3: The Integral Test

THE HEIGHT OF q-binary SEARCH TREES

WHEN IS THE (CO)SINE OF A RATIONAL ANGLE EQUAL TO A RATIONAL NUMBER?

1. C. The formula for the confidence interval for a population mean is: x t, which was

Chapter 7 Methods of Finding Estimators

A Note on Sums of Greatest (Least) Prime Factors

Incremental calculation of weighted mean and variance

where: T = number of years of cash flow in investment's life n = the year in which the cash flow X n i = IRR = the internal rate of return

A Combined Continuous/Binary Genetic Algorithm for Microstrip Antenna Design

Basic Elements of Arithmetic Sequences and Series

Ekkehart Schlicht: Economic Surplus and Derived Demand

CHAPTER 7: Central Limit Theorem: CLT for Averages (Means)

Cooley-Tukey. Tukey FFT Algorithms. FFT Algorithms. Cooley

Definition. A variable X that takes on values X 1, X 2, X 3,...X k with respective frequencies f 1, f 2, f 3,...f k has mean

How To Solve An Old Japanese Geometry Problem

Lesson 15 ANOVA (analysis of variance)

THE ARITHMETIC OF INTEGERS. - multiplication, exponentiation, division, addition, and subtraction

1 The Gaussian channel

Chapter 14 Nonparametric Statistics

On Formula to Compute Primes. and the n th Prime

Factors of sums of powers of binomial coefficients

5.3. Generalized Permutations and Combinations

Project Deliverables. CS 361, Lecture 28. Outline. Project Deliverables. Administrative. Project Comments

5: Introduction to Estimation

Elementary Theory of Russian Roulette

SEQUENCES AND SERIES

A Faster Clause-Shortening Algorithm for SAT with No Restriction on Clause Length

Partial Di erential Equations

A Recursive Formula for Moments of a Binomial Distribution

Solutions to Selected Problems In: Pattern Classification by Duda, Hart, Stork

CS103A Handout 23 Winter 2002 February 22, 2002 Solving Recurrence Relations

Confidence Intervals for Linear Regression Slope

Lesson 17 Pearson s Correlation Coefficient

ON THE DENSE TRAJECTORY OF LASOTA EQUATION

Permutations, the Parity Theorem, and Determinants

Case Study. Normal and t Distributions. Density Plot. Normal Distributions

Descriptive Statistics

THIN SEQUENCES AND THE GRAM MATRIX PAMELA GORKIN, JOHN E. MCCARTHY, SANDRA POTT, AND BRETT D. WICK

INFINITE SERIES KEITH CONRAD

Chapter System of Equations

Lecture 2: Karger s Min Cut Algorithm

.04. This means $1000 is multiplied by 1.02 five times, once for each of the remaining sixmonth

Transcription:

Spectral Graph Theory ad Applicatios WS 0/0 Lecture 4: Cheeger s Iequality Lecturer: Thomas Sauerwald & He Su Statemet of Cheeger s Iequality I this lecture we assume for simplicity that G is a d-regular graph. We shall work with the ormalized adjacecy matrix M = da. The goal of this class is to prove Cheeger s iequality which establishes a iterestig coectio betwee λ ad the (ormalized edge expasio. Defiitio 4. ((Normalized Edge Expasio of a Regular Graph. The ormalized edge expasio of a d-regular graph G is defied as: h(g = S : S V / E(S, V \ S. d S Theorem 4. ([Alo86, SJ89]. For ay d-regular graph G = (V, E, or equivaletly, Preparatios h λ h, ( λ / h ( λ. We start with a useful equality that will be applied later o. Lemma 4.3. Proof. Let us compute M u,v (x u x v = M u,v (x u x v = x T x. For the first term: M u,v (x u + x v = M u,v x u = u V Further, Therefore, u V v V M u,v x u x v = u V x u M u,v (x u + x v M u,v x u x v. v V M u,v x v = u V M u,v = x T x. x u v V M u,v (x u x v = x T x. x u (Mx u =.

Lecture 4: Cheeger s Iequality Lemma 4.4 (Courat-Fischer Formula for λ ad λ. Let λ = λ λ be the eigevalues of the ormalized adjacecy matrix M = d A. The, λ = max x T x, λ = max x Moreover, λ x M u,v (x u x v x T x x {u,v} E (x u x v dx T x Proof. We begi with the first statemet. Let v,..., v be a orthoormal basis of eigevectors. Let x be ay o-zero vector ad express x i terms of this basis of eigevectors: x = α i v i, i= where α i = v T i x. It follows that ( T ( = α i v i M α i v i = = i= ( ( α i v it i= i= αi λ i. i= i= α i λ i v i Similarly, ( ( x T x = α i v it α i v i = i= i= αi. i= Therefore, x T Mx x T x = i= α i λ i i= α i λ i= α i i= α i = λ, ( so, λ max Moreover, if x is a eigevector with eigevalue oe, the = x T x ad equatio ( becomes a equality. Thus λ = max Cosider ow ay vector x 0 with x. The, α = 0 ad therefore, x T x = i= α i λ i i= α i λ i= α i i= α i = λ,

Lecture 4: Cheeger s Iequality 3 ad we have equality agai if x is the eigevector of λ, sice the all α i = 0 except for i =. Therefore, λ = max x For the secod statemet, we kow by Lemma 4.3 that x T x λ = max M u,v (x u x v x T x x v M u,v (x u x v = x v which gives the secod statemet of the lemma. 3 Proof of Cheeger s Iequality x T x For the proof of Cheeger s iequality, we itroduce aother related expasio parameter, the so-called coductace: Φ(G := S V E(S, V \ S. d S Ituitively, the coductace measures how close a graph is to a radom d-regular graph. The reaso is that for ay set S, we have d S icidet edges ad the proportio of edges goig to V \ S is V \ S / V. Our ext claim is that: h(g Φ(G h(g. The left iequality follows directly from the defiitio. For the right iequality, we first ote that E(S, V \ S h(g S V d { S, V \ S }. Further, V \S V S V \S V { S, V \ S } ad hece h(g Φ(G. Theorem 4.5. For ay d-regular graph G = (V, E,, or equivaletly, h λ h, ( λ / h ( λ. Proof. Proof of λ h. We will relate Φ(G to λ. We first formulate Φ(G as a iteger imizatio problem to fid out that λ is essetially the relaxatio of that problem. Φ(G = x {0,}, x {0, } x {0,}, x {0, } d M u,v x u x v d( u V x u( u V x u M u,v (x u x v ( u V x u( u V x u

Lecture 4: Cheeger s Iequality 4 We ow rewrite the deoator usig the followig equality: ( ( x u x u = x u x u x v = x u x u x v = (x u x v. u V u V u V u V so that Φ(G M u,v (x u x v x {0,}, x {0, } (x u x v M u,v (x u x v x R, x {0, } (x u x v M u,v (x u x v x R, x {0, },x (x (x x + α u x v M u,v (x u x v x R, x {0, },x x R, x {0, },x = λ. x T x x ux v M u,v (x u x v x T x ( x u x v = u,v u x u x v = 0 Proof of the other directio. Let x be the correspodig eigevector to λ. Assume without loss of geerality that at most / etries of x are positive (otherwise we work with x. Defie a vector y R as y u = max{x u, 0}. We ow prove the followig iequalities: Claim 4.6.. λ P Mu,v (yu yv y T y.. ( M u,v (y u y v 4y T y M u,v y u yv 3. M u,v y u yv hy T y. Assug that the three iequalities i the above claim hold, we ca fiish the proof as follows: Claim λ Claim Claim 3 h /. M u,v (y u y v y T y ( M u,v y u yv 8(y T y The proof of the first ad secod iequality of the claim are relatively straightforward ad ca be foud i the lecture otes. We oly give the proof of the third oe, which is the most iterestig oe, as the edge expasio comes ito play. v

Lecture 4: Cheeger s Iequality 5 The third iequality is the most techical oe. Let V = {,..., } ad order the vertices so that y y y. Let t {,..., } be the largest idex such that y k > 0. The, M u,v y u yv = = t i= j=i+ where the last equality holds sice for every i < j, j k=i i yj t k k+ y, k= i k j>k k k+ y = Mi,j (y i yj Now defie for ay k N, S k := {,..., k}. The, t k t ( y k+ = y k yk+ d E(S k, V \ S k. k= k= i k j>k Moreover, by defiitio of the expasio, we have t ( y k yk+ t d E(S k, V \ S k hk (y k y k+ k= k= = h = h t k (yk y k+ k= t k= = hy T y. y k (sice t / The proof of the iequality λ h / suggests the followig algorithm for fidig a small cut.. Compute the eigevector x correspodig to the largest eigevalue λ. Order the vertices so that x x x 3. Try all cuts of the form ({,,..., k}, {k +,..., } ad retur the smallest oe By the proof of Cheeger s iequality (Theorem 4., it follows that the cut retured by above algorithm is at most λ. 4 Example We apply our algorithm to the followig graph: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lecture 4: Cheeger s Iequality 6 Clearly, the correspodig graph G is 3-regular..000 0.68 +0.68 +.000 5 6 3 4 7 8.000 0.68 +0.68 +.000 Figure : Illustratio of the graph G. The labels of the odes o the right had side display the correspodig etries of the eigevector of the secod largest eigevalue (which is 5/3. The dashed lie describes the best possible cut, which is foud by our algorithm. 5 Further Examples Let us ow apply Cheeger s iequality to three differet graphs: Let G be a complete graph with vertices. The, λ = 0 ad h(g S V \ S V \ S S : S V / d S S : S V / = / /. Let G be a cycle with vertices. Ay set S V with S / has at least two edges from S to V \ S. Hece, h(s d S / =, where the iequality is tight if S is a set of cosecutive vertices of size /. Further, λ = cos(π/ Θ(/, so the spectral ad geometric expasio differ by a square. For the hypercube G with = d vertices, you are asked i a exercise to prove that λ = d. Hece from Cheeger s iequality, h λ = d. Choosig S to be all vertices whose first bit equals zero yields Therefore, h /d. h S d S = d. Refereces [Alo86] N. Alo. Eigevalues ad expaders. Combiatorica, 6(:83 96, 986. [SJ89] Alistair Siclair ad Mark Jerrum. Approximate coutig, uiform geeratio ad rapidly mixig markov chais. If. Comput., 8(:93 33, 989.