7.1 General 5 7.2 Events resulting in pressure increase 5



Similar documents
TRANSIENT AND ACCIDENT ANALYSES FOR JUSTIFICATION OF TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS AT NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Nuclear power plant systems, structures and components and their safety classification. 1 General 3. 2 Safety classes 3. 3 Classification criteria 3

PROBABILISTIC RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENT OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Safety assessment of the Loviisa nuclear power plant

ELECTRICAL AND I&C EQUIPMENT OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

SAFETY DESIGN OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PRESSURE EQUIPMENT

MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR A NUCLEAR FACILITY

Government Degree on the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants 717/2013

May 23, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Loviisa 3 unique possibility for large scale CHP generation and CO 2 reductions. Nici Bergroth, Fortum Oyj FORS-seminar

Boiling Water Reactor Systems

SECURITY ARRANGEMENTS OF RADIATION SOURCES

Report WENRA Safety Reference Levels for Existing Reactors - UPDATE IN RELATION TO LESSONS LEARNED FROM TEPCO FUKUSHIMA DAI-ICHI ACCIDENT

HOISTING AND TRANSFER EQUIPMENT OF A NUCLEAR FACILITY

Nuclear Design Practices and the Case of Loviisa 3

3.2 Testing and inspection organisation 6

USE OF IONIZING RADIATION IN THE TEACHING OF PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STANDARD REVIEW PLAN OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

Published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) number 166 of July 10th 2009 [1]

Belgian Stress tests specifications Applicable to power reactors 17 May 2011

RADIATION PROTECTION AND EXPOSURE MONITORING OF NUCLEAR FACILITY WORKERS

How To Clean Up A Reactor Water Cleanup

Public SUMMARY OF EU STRESS TEST FOR LOVIISA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

Concrete structures for nuclear facilities

HEALTH & SAFETY EXECUTIVE NUCLEAR DIRECTORATE ASSESSMENT REPORT. New Reactor Build. EDF/AREVA EPR Step 2 PSA Assessment

Belgian Stress tests specifications Applicable to all nuclear plants, excluding power reactors 22 June 2011

Nuclear Safety Council Instruction number IS- 23 on in-service inspection at nuclear power plants

RC-17. Alejandro V. Nader National Regulatory Authority Montevideo - Uruguay

EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION (EPFAQ) NEI REVISIONS 4 THROUGH 6; NUMARC/NESP 007

C. starting positive displacement pumps with the discharge valve closed.

NEW NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT IN FINLAND ACCEPTED BY THE FINNISH PARLIAMENT

Nuclear Energy: Nuclear Energy

Operational Reactor Safety /22.903

Qualification of In-service Inspections of NPP Primary Circuit Components

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, DC June 16, 2011

Operating Performance: Accident Management: Severe Accident Management Programs for Nuclear Reactors REGDOC-2.3.2

Introductions: Dr. Stephen P. Schultz

SAFETY STANDARDS. of the. Nuclear Safety Standards Commission (KTA) KTA Residual Heat Removal Systems of Light Water Reactors.

APPENDIX B SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM A. OBJECTIVES AND PHILOSOPHY OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM

Preliminary validation of the APROS 3-D core model of the new Loviisa NPP training simulator

Dynamic Behavior of BWR

FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT IN GERMANY - PROCEDURE, DATA, RESULTS -

Swiss media visit to Olkiluoto August 15, 2014

NUCLEARINSTALLATIONSAFETYTRAININGSUPPORTGROUP DISCLAIMER

Investigations of a Long-Distance 1000 MW Heat Transport System with APROS Simulation Software

Trip Parameter Acceptance Criteria for the Safety Analysis of CANDU Nuclear Power Plants

NURESAFE EUROPEAN PROJECT Second General Seminar

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON MODERN VVER GEN III TECHNOLOGY. Mikhail Maltsev Head of Department JSC Atomenergoproekt

Cyber Security Design Methodology for Nuclear Power Control & Protection Systems. By Majed Al Breiki Senior Instrumentation & Control Manager (ENEC)

RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING IN FINLAND

IV. Occurrence and Progress of Accidents in Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations and Other Facilities

GENERAL REGULATIONS ON ENSURING SAFETY OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS OPB-88/97, NP (PNAE G ) Cover page. Contents

EU S TRESS TEST SWISS NA TIONAL REPORT

THREE MILE ISLAND ACCIDENT

Development Study of Nuclear Power Plants for the 21st Century

Fuel Treatment and Conditioning Systems

Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants

COMPARISON OF ELECTRICITY GENERATION COSTS

Select the Right Relief Valve - Part 1 Saeid Rahimi

DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE DG-1154 (Proposed Revision 2 of Regulatory Guide 1.128, dated October 1978)

CFD Topics at the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Christopher Boyd, Ghani Zigh Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research June 2008

Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi accident. Nuclear fission. Distribution of energy. Fission product distribution. Nuclear fuel

Report. November 2013

10 Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 10.1

Pressurized Water Reactor B&W Technology Crosstraining Course Manual. Chapter 9.0. Integrated Control System

IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making. System Analysis. Lecturer. Workshop Information IAEA Workshop

WARNING SIGNS FOR RADIATION SOURCES

Office for Nuclear Regulation

INTRODUCTION. Three Mile Island Unit 2

Improving reactor safety systems using component redundancy allocation technique

L.S. de Carvalho, J. M de Oliveira Neto 1. INTRODUCTION IAEA-CN-164-5P01

NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SYSTEMS and OPERATION

Source Term Determination Methods of the Slovenian Nuclear Safety Administration Emergency Response Team

The Piping System Model a New Life Cycle Document. Elements of the Piping System Model

TVO and Nuclear Waste Management at Olkiluoto. Corporate Adviser

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C June 1, 2005

The Safety of Borssele Nuclear Power Station

Application of Nuclear and Aerospace Industry Experience to Offshore Barrier Integrity Management

Elements Elements describe the essential outcomes. 1. Prepare to diagnose and repair air conditioning and HVAC system

URESANDACTIONSCROSS-BORDERNETHER

Accidents of loss of flow for the ETTR-2 reactor: deterministic analysis

Licence condition handbook

Flowserve - Edward Valves Quick Closing Isolation Valves -The Equiwedge Alternative

Ontario Power Generation Pickering Fuel Channel Fitness for Service. August 2014

Nuclear Power Plant Electrical Power Supply System Requirements

Heating Water by Direct Steam Injection

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS

A Code of Practice for Pressure Equipment in the Department of Physics

What is a successful Steam Trap Management Program?

V K Raina. Reactor Group, BARC

Refinery Equipment of Texas. Mini - Refinery Feasibility Overview

ASME B31.3 Process Piping. Scope of B31.3 Course

Transcription:

GUIDE YVL 2.4 / 24 Ma r ch 2006 Primary and secondary circuit pressure control at a nuclear power plant 1 Ge n e r a l 3 2 General design requirements 3 3 Pressure regulation 4 4 Overpressure protection 4 5 Pressure reduction 4 6 Safety valves 4 7 De m o n s t r a t i o n o f t h e a c c e p t a b i l i t y o f p r e s s u r e c o n t r o l s ys t e m s 5 7.1 General 5 7.2 Events resulting in pressure increase 5 7.2.1 Anticipated operational transients 5 7.2.2 Postulated accidents 5 7.2.3 Anticipated transients without scram (ATWS) 6 7.2.4 Pressure increase at low operating pressure 6 7.3 Pressure reduction during accidents 6 7.4 Overpressure protection of PWR secondary circuit 6 8 Oversight by STUK 6 This Guide is in force as of 1 October 2006 until further notice. It replaces Guide YVL 2.4, issued on 18 January 1996. Third, revised edition Helsinki 2007 ISSN 0783-2346 ISBN 978-952-478-283-8 (print) Edita Prima Oy ISBN 978-952-478-284-5 (pdf) ISBN 978-952-478-285-2 (html) STUK SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Osoite/Address Laippatie 4, 00880 Helsinki Postiosoite / Postal address PL / P.O.Box 14, FIN-00881 Helsinki, FINLAND Puh./Tel. (09) 759 881, +358 9 759 881 Fax (09) 759 88 500, +358 9 759 88 500 www.stuk.fi

Authorisation By virtue of the below acts and regulations, the Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK) issues detailed regulations that apply to the safe use of nuclear energy and to physical protection, emergency preparedness and safeguards: Section 55 of the Nuclear Energy Act (990/1987) Section 29 of the Government Decision (395/1991) on the Safety of Nuclear Power Plants Section 13 of the Government Decision (396/1991) on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Power Plants Section 11 of the Government Decision (397/1991) on the Emergency Preparedness of Nuclear Power Plants Section 8 of the Government Decision (398/1991) on the Safety of a Disposal Facility for Reactor Waste Section 30 of the Government Decision (478/1999) on the Safety of Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Rules for application The publication of a YVL Guide does not, as such, alter any previous decisions made by STUK. After having heard those concerned, STUK makes a separate decision on how a new or revised YVL Guide applies to operating nuclear power plants, or to those under construction, and to licensees operational activities. The guides apply as such to new nuclear facilities. When considering how new safety requirements presented in YVL Guides apply to operating nuclear power plants, or to those under construction, STUK takes into account Section 27 of the Government Decision (395/1991), which prescribes that for further safety enhancement, action shall be taken which can be regarded as justified considering operating experience and the results of safety research as well as the advancement of science and technology. If deviations are made from the requirements of the YVL Guides, STUK shall be presented with some other acceptable procedure or solution by which the safety level set forth in the YVL Guides is achieved. Translation. Original text in Finnish.

Guide YVL 2.4 / 24 Ma r ch 2006 1 General Primary and secondary circuit pressure control is of essential importance to ensure the safety of a nuclear power plant. This Guide contains design and analysis requirements for the primary and secondary circuit pressure control systems of nuclear power plants equipped with pressurised and boiling water reactors. For the purposes of this Guide, pressure control means pressure regulation, overpressure protection and pressure reduction. To ensure the safety of the nuclear power plant it is essential that there are no interruptions in heat transfer from the reactor to the ultimate heat sink. An uninterrupted heat transfer is ensured when the coolant volume and the pressure and temperature conditions in the circuits are appropriate. To maintain appropriate conditions, pressure control must function reliably during normal operational conditions and anticipated transients. Overpressure protection of the primary and secondary circuit is essential for maintaining the integrity of the heat transfer chain. The pressure-temperature limits during normal operation of the primary circuit are determined on the basis of sufficient safety margins in order to prevent rapid fracturing of pressure equipment. For a pressurised water reactor, on the other hand, these limits are determined on the basis of a sufficient margin with respect to boiling. Pressure reduction may be required during an accident to interrupt a coolant leak, or to ensure reactor emergency cooling or residual heat removal. During a severe accident, a rupture of the reactor pressure vessel at high pressure endangers containment integrity. Primary circuit pressure reduction is thus an integral part of a severe accident management strategy. Requirements on systems design are given in Guide YVL 2.0, on the commissioning of systems in Guide YVL 2.5, on control systems in Guide YVL 5.5, on safety valves in Guide YVL 5.4 and on strength and brittle fracture analyses in Guide YVL 3.5. Requirements on systems maintenance and operation during service life are contained in Guides YVL 1.8 and YVL 1.9. The dose limits for radioactive releases are given in Guide YVL 7.1. 2 General design requirements STUK The defence in depth principle shall be applied in the design of pressure control at the nuclear power plant. According to the principle, systems and equipment with different capabilities shall be used for pressure control in such a way that preventive actions to ward off the consequences of a transient or accident are proportional to the severity of the event. The design bases shall specifically ensure that during operational conditions it is not necessary to remove primary coolant out from closed systems, with the exception of a possible brief discharge to manage a transient operate a safety valve. According to Guide YVL 1.0, pressure control during primary to secondary leaks at a PWR plant shall be so arranged that it will not be necessary to discharge coolant into the environment. However, a brief discharge to the environment through the discharge valve of the steam line can be accepted during an accident if acceptability of event management can be demonstrated by means of an analysis in compliance with sub-section 7.4. The overpressure protection and the reactor scram system of a BWR plant shall be designed to operate so that the successful operation of these systems is independent of each other. A scram must not fail during an accident described in sub-section 7.2.2 that proves to be the most limiting for overpressure protection even if none of the safety valves designed for overpressure protection open. Correspondingly, even if the scram function fails, the overpressure protection function must be accomplished as described in sub-section 7.2.3. The diversity principle shall be applied in the design of the pressure control systems of the reactor cooling system to reduce the likelihood of common cause failures. This means that the system shall contain components of different types or components having different operating principles (see Guide YVL 2.7). 3

STUK Guide YVL 2.4 / 24 Ma r ch 2006 3 Pressure regulation Systems used for pressure regulation in a reactor plant include the pressuriser injection systems and electric heaters of the PWR, the discharge valves of the secondary circuit, the bypass valves of the turbine; the regulating valves of the BWR turbine and the bypass valves of the turbine, as well as the systems that control these systems. According to Guide YVL, 1.0, rector pressure control shall be designed such that, during normal operational conditions, pressure can be maintained within the limits required by normal cooling even in the event of a single failure of some pressure regulating component or control system. As a rule, anticipated operational transients shall be taken care of by using the pressure control systems intended for normal plant operation so that it will not be necessary to use high capacity relief valves to limit overpressurisation of the primary circuit. The control and maintenance of primary and secondary circuit pressure shall be ensured even in an event where the offsite power supply has been lost. 4 Overpressure protection Components used for overpressure protection of the primary and the secondary circuit of a reactor plant include discharge valves, safety valves and protection systems that are designed to prevent erroneous operation of systems that can increase pressure. Components that can increase pressure in the primary circuit (e.g. pressuriser heaters and pumps) shall be equipped with a protection system that will stop the operation of the component to prevent erroneous pressure increase. The protection system shall be capable of implementing the protection function also in case of a single failure. Special attention shall be paid to the reliable closing of pressure relief and safety valves. The closing of the discharge line shall be ensured, if necessary, by adding a stop valve to the line. In other respects, the requirements for the design of safety valves (sub-section 6) also apply to discharge valves. At low operating temperatures the ductility and pressure resistance of the structural materials of the nuclear power plant s main components may be essentially lower than at normal operating temperatures. The permitted loadings of the nuclear power plant s main components at low operating temperatures shall be established and on their basis the pressure and temperature ranges for the safe operation of the components shall be determined. Deviations from the determined ranges shall be reliably prevented during operation even in the event of a single failure. Operational transients and accidents shall be analysed as operational loads B, C or D, in compliance with Guide YVL 3.5. 5 Pressure reduction The primary circuits of a PWR and a BWR plant and also the steam generators of a PWR plant shall be provided with devices, which can be used for reduction of pressure controllably during accidents. These devices shall have a remote control function and a power supply unit which is independent of the electrical power supply units designed for operational conditions and postulated accidents. Valves designed for this purpose shall be so designed that, once they have opened, they stay open reliably. 6 Safety valves The primary circuit and the steam generators of a PWR plant shall be equipped with several redundant safety valves. Redundant safety valves protecting the same item shall be set to open at several stages so that the number of opened valves corresponds to the discharge requirement. In this way the opening of too many valves is prevented, the risk posed by a stuck-open valve is reduced and a transient associated with the valve s opening is mitigated. If possible, a stop valve should not be placed between the protected item and the safety valve, in the discharge line of the safety valve or in the control line required in the opening of the safety valve. If exceptions to this rule are made to facilitate testing or maintenance or to provide against 4

Guide YVL 2.4 / 24 Ma r ch 2006 STUK a stuck-open safety valve, the stop valve s inadvertent closing shall be reliably prevented. The safety valve shall be equipped with a position indicator which is independent of the control equipment. In the design of the safety valves, their pilot valves and connecting pipelines, the possible accumulation of uncondensed gases and condensate plus their harmful effects shall be considered. The system of safety valves for overpressure protection and the associated piping shall be designed to discharge steam and also steam-water mixture and water. Detailed instructions for the design of safety valves and equivalent relief valves are given in Guide YVL 5.4. 7 Demonstration of the acceptability of pressure control systems 7.1 General Analyses shall be conducted demonstrating that the pressure control systems meet the design requirements. The cases to be analysed are those during which the reactor pressure tends to increase or decrease in consequence of an initiating event and situations where the reactor circuit pressure must be reduced by means of automatic systems or operator action. As presented in Guide YVL 2.2, initiating events are divided into anticipated operational transients and postulated accidents according to their frequency. A reduction of the primary circuit pressure during a severe reactor accident shall also be analysed as well as a reduction of the primary circuit and/or secondary circuit pressure during accidents in which pressure needs to be reduced in order to ensure removal of decay heat and/or cooling of the reactor. 7.2 Events resulting in pressure increase 7.2.1 Anticipated operational transients When analysing situations mentioned in this sub-section, it is assumed that before and during a transient all systems of the power plant operate as designed and in conformity with the nominal parameters, with the exception of the failure initiating the transient and the direct consequences of the failure. The acceptance criterion for anticipated operational transients is that the primary circuit design pressure is not exceeded and that not a single safety valve needs to open. 7.2.2 Postulated accidents When conducting analyses of accidents which lead to pressure increase, the input values and assumptions for the analyses are chosen according to Guide YVL 2.2, with the following additions: reactivity coefficients are the least favourable for the situation in question considering the entire operating cycle of the reactor reactor scram occurs after the second reactor protection system signal pressure reduction systems other than safety valves and the equivalent relief valves fail the number of safety valves and equivalent relief valves that fail in the closed position as follows: total no of safety valves failed 2 3 1 4 8 2 9 one fourth of the number rounded off to the next integer the discharge flow capacity of safety valves and equivalent discharge valves equals to the nominal capacity determined on the basis of an applicable standard and the opening pressure equals to the nominal setting safety valves with different discharge flow capacities fail in the order of size (starting from the largest) as follows: first, fourth, ninth, thirteenth, etc, always at intervals of four safety valves which have the same discharge flow capacity but have been set to open at different pressures fail in the order of the opening pressures (starting from the lowest pressure) as follows: first, fourth, ninth, thirteenth, etc, always at intervals of four if an applicable standard requires more than one control device to control the operation of a discharge or safety valve and the devices have been set at different pressures, the opening pressure is the higher setting pressure. 5

STUK Guide YVL 2.4 / 24 Ma r ch 2006 An analysis shall be conducted to demonstrate that the pressure of the item to be protected keeps lower than 1.1 times the design pressure of the protected item. 7.2.3 Anticipated transients without scram (ATWS) When analysing ATWS events, the assumptions presented in Guide YVL 2.2 are used. The acceptance criterion for these analyses is that the pressure of the protected item does not exceed a pressure that is 1.3 times the design pressure of the item. In addition, any deformation of the reactor primary circuit and damage to the reactor pressure vessel internals must not prevent safe reactor shutdown. A conservative value based on test results is the acceptable pressure limit for the heat transfer tubes of the steam generators. 7.2.4 Pressure increase at low operating pressure The analyses to be performed at low operating temperatures, as specified in Guide YVL 2.2, shall separately consider each event resulting in pressure increase. The analyses shall demonstrate that the systems designed to prevent pressure increases maintain pressure and temperature at such values that sufficient margins against rapid fracturing of the equipment due to a postulated failure are guaranteed at each operating load in compliance with Guide YVL 3.5. 7.3 Pressure reduction during accidents The acceptable operation of controlled pressure reduction systems during accidents shall be demonstrated by analyses examining the accomplishment of safety functions for whose implementation controlled pressure reduction is required. 7.4 Overpressure protection of PWR secondary circuit The assumptions and analysis approval criteria presented in sub-section 7.2.2. are applied to the analysis of the over-pressure protection of the secondary circuit of a PWR with the following explication: when the isolation valves of all steam lines close, the sections of the secondary circuit that are within the isolation valves of the steam lines are analysed as a single protected item. Valves designed for over-pressure protection that fail in closed position are defined in accordance with sub-section 7.2.2. Failed valves shall be divided between the different steam generators in a manner that is most unfavourable to the end result of the analysis. A brief discharge into the environment through the discharge valve of the steam line is acceptable during a primary-to-secondary circuit leak classified as a postulated accident, provided that the radiation dose resulting from the discharge remains below the dose limit defined for the postulated accident in an analysis performed in compliance with sub-section 4.1.1 of Guide YVL 2.2 8 Oversight by STUK The design bases and the analyses for pressure control shall be included in the preliminary and final safety analysis reports of the plant unit. STUK controls compliance with the requirements that pertain to pressure control in connection with the reviews of the preliminary and the final safety analysis reports of a new plant unit. Any changes in pressure control at existing plant units are reviewed in connection with the conceptual design phase of the systems and components associated with pressure control, the system preinspection documentation and the construction plans of the components. STUK assesses the systems and components utilised in pressure control as part of the inspections included in the operational inspection programme. STUK controls in particular how the licensee arranges appropriate maintenance of these systems and components, and how the results of their tests as well as their operating experience are taken into consideration. 6