Zentrum für BrennstoffzellenTechnik Presented at the COMSOL Conference 28 Hannover European COMSOL Conference, Hannover, Germany 4.-6.11.28 Modeling Polybenzimidazole/Phosphoric Acid Membrane Behaviour in a HTPEM Fuel Cell C. Siegel*, G. Bandlamudi, A. Heinzel *c.siegel@zbt-duisburg.de ZBT-Duisburg GmbH Universität Duisburg-Essen Institut für Energie- und Umweltverfahrenstechnik
Outline of this oral presentation Introduction: - University of Duisburg-Essen / ZBT-Duisburg GmbH - High temperature PEM fuel cell (HTPEM) - Review: 2D HTPEM model (European COMSOL Conference 27) - Objectives of this 3D study Modeling efforts: - Computational subdomains - Governing equations - Boundary conditions Computational methodology: - Meshing - Solver settings and solution procedures Results: - Modeling base case operating conditions - Experimental investigations - Conclusion & outlook
University of Duisburg-Essen / ZBT-Duisburg GmbH University Duisburg-Essen: Hydrogen and fuel cell R&D since 1996 ZBT-Duisburg GmbH established in 21 TAZ established in 28 Hydrogen and fuel cell related activities in 7 divisions Focusing the HTPEM technology: - Bipolar-plate development - Cell and stack design and operation - System integration - Theoretical analyses (e.g., modeling and simulation)
High temperature PEM fuel cell (HTPEM) Fuel Cell - Device which electrochemically converts energy stored in a fuel and oxidant into electricity (e.g. oxygen/hydrogen half - cell reactions) Some benefits of using higher operating temperatures: - Reformate gas (higher CO-tolerance) - No humidification (simplified system design) - Faster reaction kinetics - Simplified heat management Objectives: - Development a complete large scale 3D HTPEM model (including structural details) - Model validation with experimental investigations Challenges: - Only few CFD/FEM models available in open literature (e.g. Cheddie et al., Peng et al., Korsgaard et al.) - (Relatively) new technology (some transport processes not fully understood yet) - Only few material parameters available
Review: 2D HTPEM (European COMSOL Conference 27)* Anode inlet / H 2, H 2 O 1 1-3 [m] 1 1-3 [m] GDL 32 1-6 [m] - 2D along-the-channel model - All conservation laws included -PBI/H 3 sol-gel membrane conductivity (empirical equation based on published results) σ 3 2 m = km,1 km,2 Ts + km,3 Ts km, 4 T s y z PBI/H 3 membrane 125 1-6 [m] Anode RL 5 1-6 [m] Cathode RL 6 1-6 [m].4 [m] Cathode inlet / O 2, N 2, H 2 O -Results *Siegel, C. et al., Proceedings of the European COMSOL Conference Vol. 1, Numerical simulation of a high-temperature PEM (HTPEM) fuel cell, 428-434, Petit, J.-M., Squalli, O., Grenoble, France (27) U cell [V] 1.9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1 2D simulation Experimental 1 2 3 4 Current density J [A m -2 ] 3.E+3 2.5E+3 2.E+3 1.5E+3 1E+3.5E+3 P cell [W m -2 ]
Objectives of this 3D study - Development of a 3D HTPEM model including gas channels and bipolar-plates - Enhancement of the already developed and presented 2D study - All conservation equations (mass, momentum, energy, species, charge) included - PBI/H 3 sol-gel membrane conductivity modeled using an Arrhenius equation - Most physical and material properties updated according the latest publications in the field and personal communications - More realistic view of HTPEM operation behaviour
Computational subdomains 3D model extended to the third dimension (here x).5 [m 2 ] MEA, 6 channel parallel serpentine flow-field (here LTPEM same for higher temperatures) 5-layer MEA H 2 inlet (Gas channel) Dimensions:.2 [m] by.3 [m] by.1 [m] (x, y, z) O 2, N 2 inlet (Gas channel) Mass / momentum balance (u,p): - Gas channel Navier-Stokes - Porous media Brinkmann Mass / species balance (ω i ): - Gas channel and porous media Stefan-Maxwell convection and diffusion Charge balance (φ i ): - Bipolar-plate, GDL, RL, PBI/H 3 sol-gel membrane Conductive media DC Mass / energy balance (T i ) - Gas channel, bipolar-plate, GDL, RL, PBI/H 3 sol-gel membrane Heat transfer
Boundary conditions Boundary condition Gas flow and pressure L Velocity (inlet) calculated e u MEA f i, in = xi, in γ i J ach n F t T ( P I η ( u + ( u) ) u = t t r = n P, e Pressure (outlet) measured T r η u + ( u) n = a ( ) t t P = P, out t R T 1 P i Note Calculated Measured (ambient pressure) Experimental data St. A 1.35 St. C 2.5 Species Charge Solid phase temperature Fluid phase temperature Mass fraction (inlet) Convective flux (outlet) Cell voltage (cathode) Reference potential (anode) Cell temperature Gas temperature (inlet) Convective flux (outlet) Gas composition Defined Defined Defined (controlled) Measured.25 %RH A 4 %RH C.95-.5 [V] 15-18 [ C] 21 [ C]
Meshing GDL Structured mesh to reduce the number of degrees of freedom (DOF) - GDL 5 elements in y - RL 5 elements in y - PBI/H 3 sol-gel membrane 4 elements in y - Gas channel 6 x 6 x 14 elements in x, y and z Mesh statistics: Number of DOF: 378,139 Number of mesh points: 1,4 y z x Number of elements: 8,82 Minimum element quality:.178 Element volume ratio:.6
Solver settings and solution procedures COMSOL MP 3.4 / Quad-core 8GB Ram i) PARDISO direct solver (±9 s) φ i u, P ω i T i ii) Segregated group solver (±43 s) u, P ω i T i, φ i Relative error on solution [-] 1,E+4 1,E+3 1,E+2 1,E+1 1,E+ 1,E-1 1,E-2 1,E-3 1,E-4 1,E-5 1,E-6 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 ii i UMFPACK direct solver Group 1 Segregated solver Group 2 Segregated solver Group 3 Segregated solver # of iterations [-] Details: Artificial diffusion (streamline) Problem solved sequentially using solver scripting Initial conditions updated Convergence criteria 1 1-6
Experimental investigations All tests performed at the ZBT in Duisburg Dedicated NI-LabVIEW controlled teststand for model validation Design: HTPEM single cell assembly (temperature controlled heated aluminum endplate) Bipolar-plates: Highly conductive (electrical and thermal) inhouse bipolar-plates (polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) based)* 6 channel parallel serpentine flow field (anode and cathode side) Membrane electrode assembly: Highly doped commercially available PBI/H 3 sol-gel membrane (.5 [m 2 ]) Similar to: GDL E-tek (ELAT) Assumed loading.1 [kg m -2 ] (anode) /.75 [kg m -2 ] (cathode) with a Pt/C-ratio of.3 [-] *Derieth, T. et al., Development of highly filled graphite compounds as bipolar plate material for low and high temperature PEM fuel cells, J. New Mat. Electrochem. Systems 11 (28)
Results (mass/species balance) - Operating conditions 16 C Oxygen mass fraction inside the reaction layer.6 [V].5 [V] Hydrogen mass fraction inside the reaction layer.6 [V].5 [V] located under the bipolar-plate land
Results (charge balance) - Operating conditions 16 C Current density distribution inside the reaction layer (cathode).6 [V].5 [V] Current density J [A m -2 ] 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 U =.6 [V] U =.5 [V] -5 1-4 -1 1-4 3 1-4 7 1-4 1.1 1-3 1.5 1-3 x-coordinate [m] 1 16 U cell [V].9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1 2 4 6 Current density J [ma cm -2 ] 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 P cell [W]
Results (energy balance) - Operating conditions 16 C Anode gas channel Cathode gas channel.6 [V].5 [V].6 [V].5 [V] Outlet Inlet Measured gas outlet temperatures over different load currents 11 35 Anode and cathode gas temperatures T f [ C] 1 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Cathode outlet Load current Anode outlet.5 [V].6 [V] 3 25 2 15 1 5 Load current I [A] Inlet Outlet 14:9:36 14:31:12 14:52:48 15:14:24 15:36: Time t [s]
PBI/H 3 sol-gel membrane modeling Conductivity dependent on H 3 doping level Number of H 3 molecules per PBI repeat unit Here: Doping level X (and X-2) expressed using a density relation (similar to*) Amorphous phase volume fraction used to calculate (empirically) the - Pre-exponential factor and - Activation energy Amorphous phase volume fraction [Vol.%] 1.9.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1 Sol-gel PBI/H 3 membrane 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 5 55 6 65 7 Doping level X [-].25.2.15.1.5 Derivative [-] Δ = k1 ln ( X ) 2 σ, E + k *Cheddie, D. et al., A two-phase model of an intermediate temperature PEM fuel cell, Int. J. of Hydrogen Energy 32 (27) Activation energy ΔE [kj mol -1 ] 4 3 2 1 Sol-gel PBI/H 3 membrane.6.7.8.9 1 Amorphous phase volume fraction [Vol.%] 2 16 12 8 4 Pre-exponential factor σ [S K m -1 ]
Results (charge balance) - Operating conditions 16 C 17 C PBI/H 3 sol-gel membrane conductivity.6 [V].6 [V] 16 C 17 C Conductivity [S m -1 ] 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 H 3 (8 [wt.%]) * H 3 (9 [wt.%]) * PBI/H 3 (Arrhenius) PBI/H 3 ** Ratio 5 4 3 2 Ratio of conductivity [-] 2 1 1 ΔS +ΔS ΔE( k ) i, X f 2 2 ( ) z F σ = ki, X R T 2 s σ R = σ e d C e R α υ Ts σ H ( 85.%) 3PO wt 4 rpbi / PA/ H = 2.8 3. 3PO4 σ PBI / H PO *Xiao, L. et al., High-temperature polybenzimidazole fuel cell membranes via a sol-gel process, Chem. Mater. 17 (25) **Chin, D.T. et al., On the conductivity of phosphoric acid electrolyte, J. Appl. Electrochem., 19 (1989) 25 5 75 1 125 15 175 2 Temperature T s [ C] 3 4
Conclusion & outlook Development of a 3D HTPEM model Ameliorated PBI/H 3 sol-gel membrane model development and shortly discussed Detailed solid- and fluid-phase temperature investigations Model not validated but rather compared with experimental data Further development of a complete HTPEM single fuel cell assembly model by our group Update material parameters (continuously) Enhance electrochemical part of the model (e.g., agglomerate approach, H 3 distribution modeling?) Large scale flow-field simulation (e.g., pressure losses) Tempering concepts (e.g. bipolarplate temperature distribution) Structural aspects (e.g., overall displacement)
Zentrum für BrennstoffzellenTechnik Thank you very much! Questions, comments? Discussion!