Design Example 1 Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters 11.4



Similar documents
Review of Code Provisions on Design Seismic Forces for Liquid Storage Tanks

SEISMIC APPROACH DESIGN COMPARISON BETWEEN

DESIGN DRIFT REQUIREMENTS FOR LONG-PERIOD STRUCTURES

Untopped Precast Concrete Diaphragms in High-Seismic Applications. Ned M. Cleland, Ph.D., P.E. President Blue Ridge Design, Inc. Winchester, Virginia

Cover. When to Specify Intermediate Precast Concrete Shear Walls Rev 4. White Paper WP004

PROHITECH WP3 (Leader A. IBEN BRAHIM) A short Note on the Seismic Hazard in Israel

DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES PART V SEISMIC DESIGN

>

SEISMIC TESTING OF NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS AND ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESCRIBED RESPONSE SPECTRUM

Contractor s Statement of Responsibility for Seismic-Force-Resisting Systems This form is to be filled out by the contractor.

The ASCE 7 standard Minimum Design Loads for

TECHNICAL NOTE. Design of Diagonal Strap Bracing Lateral Force Resisting Systems for the 2006 IBC. On Cold-Formed Steel Construction INTRODUCTION

Reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames are structural systems that work to

Earthquakes and Data Centers

Rehabilitation of a 1985 Steel Moment- Frame Building

NATURAL PHENOMENA HAZARDS DESIGN AND EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY FACILITIES

Critical Facility Round Table

Seismic Risk Evaluation of a Building Stock and Retrofit Prioritization

EARTHQUAKE INDUCED AMPLIFIED LOADS IN STEEL INVERTED V- TYPE CONCENTRICALLY BRACED FRAMES

AP CALCULUS AB 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES (Form B)

Topographic Maps Practice Questions and Answers Revised October 2007

Seismic Retrofit of Bridges - A Short Course

SEISMIC DESIGN OF MULTI-STORY BUILDINGS WITH METALLIC STRUCTURAL FUSES. R. Vargas 1 and M. Bruneau 2 ABSTRACT

W02D2-2 Table Problem Newton s Laws of Motion: Solution

Bridge Seismic Design, Retrofitting and Loss Assessment

THE COSMOS VIRTUAL DATA CENTER

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )

C B A T 3 T 2 T What is the magnitude of the force T 1? A) 37.5 N B) 75.0 N C) 113 N D) 157 N E) 192 N

Seismic Waves Practice

Protecting data centers from seismic activity Understanding enclosure standards is critical to protecting equipment

NORSAR/International Center of Geohazards (ICG) Kjeller, Norway. International Conference on Open Risk Analysis Cambridge, UK June 2009

Locating the Epicenter and Determining the Magnitude of an Earthquake

Control of Seismic Drift Demand for Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Weak First Stories

THE RELIABILITY OF CAPACITY-DESIGNED COMPONENTS IN SEISMIC RESISTANT SYSTEMS

ABSG Consulting, Tokyo, Japan 2. Professor, Kogakuin University, Tokyo, Japan 3

Intermediate Seismic Hazard (May 2011) Evaluation of an intermediate seismic hazard for the existing Swiss nuclear power plants

Plotting Earthquake Epicenters an activity for seismic discovery

PRACTICE FINAL. Problem 1. Find the dimensions of the isosceles triangle with largest area that can be inscribed in a circle of radius 10cm.

ATMS 310 Jet Streams

AFAD DEPREM DAİRESİ BAŞKANLIĞI TÜRKİYE KUVVETLİ YER HAREKETİ ve ÖN HASAR TAHMİN SİSTEMLERİ ÇALIŞMA GRUBU. (Rapid Estimation Damage)

Using GIS for Assessing Earthquake Hazards of San Francisco Bay, California, USA

Comparative analysis between elastic response spectra of different European Codes

Development of Seismic-induced Fire Risk Assessment Method for a Building

SEISMIC CAPACITY OF EXISTING RC SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN OTA CITY, TOKYO, JAPAN

Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Liquid Storage Tanks

SEISMIC DESIGN AND CODES IN MEXICO

TRAVELING WAVE EFFECTS ON NONLINEAR SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF CONCRETE GRAVITY DAMS

SOFTWARE FOR GENERATION OF SPECTRUM COMPATIBLE TIME HISTORY

SEISMIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAY BRIDGES

CHAPTER SEISMIC RISK MITIGATION PRACTICES IN SCHOOL BUILDINGS IN ISTANBUL, TURKEY

TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE INTRODUCTION

3.1 Solving Systems Using Tables and Graphs

THE NEW BRAZILIAN STANDARD FOR SEISMIC DESIGN

AP CALCULUS AB 2006 SCORING GUIDELINES. Question 4

Section 1. Inequalities

Performance-based Evaluation of the Seismic Response of Bridges with Foundations Designed to Uplift

Hybrid simulation evaluation of the suspended zipper braced frame

SEISMIC ENGINEERING GUIDELINES

Advanced GIS for Loss Estimation and Rapid Post-Earthquake Assessment of Building Damage

DECISION PROCESS AND OPTIMIZATION RULES FOR SEISMIC RETROFIT PROGRAMS. T. Zikas 1 and F. Gehbauer 2

SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA

Chapter 4. Forces and Newton s Laws of Motion. continued

Procedure for Marine Traffic Simulation with AIS Data

Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas

The earthquake source

SMIP2000 Seminar Proceedings COSMOS VIRTUAL STRONG MOTION DATA CENTER. Ralph Archuleta

EARTHQUAKES. Compressional Tensional Slip-strike

Collective Chord Behavior in Large Flexible Diaphragms

Notes for EER #4 Graph transformations (vertical & horizontal shifts, vertical stretching & compression, and reflections) of basic functions.

EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES

Dynamic Pile Analysis Using CAPWAP and Multiple Sensors Camilo Alvarez 1, Brian Zuckerman 2, and John Lemke 3

Class Notes from: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering By Steven Kramer, Prentice-Hall. Ground motion parameters

Probability and Random Variables. Generation of random variables (r.v.)

Ring of Fire. (15 minutes) Earthquakes and volcanoes occur in relationship to each other.

Seismic Risk Prioritization of RC Public Buildings

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE - FACULTY OF LAND RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING -BUCHAREST

Curriculum Map Earth Science - High School

Design for Nonstructural Components

SEISMIC EVALUATION OF HOSPITAL PIPING SYSTEMS

Earthquake Magnitude Calculator for the AS-1 Seismograph 1

Analysis of seismic response control for long-span cable-stayed. bridge under traveling wave input *

G. Michele Calvi IUSS Pavia

Method To Solve Linear, Polynomial, or Absolute Value Inequalities:

Prepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California Prepared By

SIESMIC SLOSHING IN CYLINDRICAL TANKS WITH FLEXIBLE BAFFLES

Determination of source parameters from seismic spectra

Seismic Risk Assessment Procedures for a System consisting of Distributed Facilities -Part three- Insurance Portfolio Analysis

Recommended Specifications, Commentaries, and Example Problems

CLIMWAT 2.0 for CROPWAT

A comparative study of two models for the seismic analysis of buildings

KINETICS Seismic & Wind Design Manual Section D2.0

HOW TO EVALUATE BUILDINGS AND DETERMINE RETROFIT COSTS

ChE-1800 H-2: Flowchart Diagrams (last updated January 13, 2013)

Bandwidth-dependent transformation of noise data from frequency into time domain and vice versa

AN IMPROVED SEISMIC DESIGN APPROACH FOR TWO-COLUMN REINFORCED CONCRETE BENTS OVER FLEXIBLE FOUNDATIONS WITH PREDEFINED DAMAGE LEVELS

Transcription:

Design Example 1 Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters 11.4 OVERVIEW For a given building site, the risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake spectral response accelerations S S, at short periods, and S 1, at a 1-second period, are given by the acceleration contour maps in Chapter 22 in Figures 22-1 through 22-6. This example illustrates the general procedure for determining the design spectral response acceleration parameters S DS and S D1 from the mapped values of S S and S 1. The parameters S DS and S D1 are used to calculate the design response spectrum in Section 11.4.5 and the design base shear in Section 12.8. The easiest and most accurate way to obtain the spectral values is to use the U.S. Seismic Design Maps application from the USGS website (http://geohazards.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php). The USGS application allows for values of S S and S 1 to be provided based on the address or the longitude and latitude of the site being entered. PROBLEM STATEMENT A building site in California is located at 38.123 North (Latitude 38.123 ) and 121.123 West (Longitude -121.123 ). The soil profile is Site Class D. DETERMINE THE FOLLOWING: 1. Mapped risk-targeted maximum considered earthquake (MCE R ) spectral response acceleration parameters S S and S 1. 2. Site coefficients F a and F v and MCE R spectral response acceleration parameters S MS and S M1 adjusted for Site Class effects. 3. Design spectral response acceleration parameters S DS and S D1. 1. Mapped MCE R Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters S s and S 1 11.4.1 For the given site at 38.123 North (Latitude 38.123 ) and 121.123 West (Longitude -121.123 ), the USGS U.S. Seismic Design Maps application provides the values of S S = 0.634g S 1 = 0.272g. 2012 IBC SEAOC Structural/Seismic Design Manual, Vol. 1 1

11.4 Design Example 1 n Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters 2. Site Coefficients F a and F v and MCE R Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters S MS and S M1 Adjusted for Site Class Effects 11.4.3 For the given Site Class D and the values of S S and S 1 determined above, the site coefficients are F a = 1.293 F v = 1.856. T11.4-1 T11.4-2 The MCE R spectral response acceleration parameters adjusted for Site Class effects are S MS = F a S S = 1.292(0.634g) = 0.819g Eq 11.4-1 S M1 = F v S 1 = 1.857(0.272g) = 0.505g Eq 11.4-2 3. Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters S DS and S D1 11.4.4 S DS = (2/3) S MS = (2/3)(0.819g) = 0.546g Eq 11.4-3 S D1 = (2/3) S M1 = (2/3)(0.505g) = 0.337g Eq 11.4-4 Commentary The USGS application U.S. Seismic Design Maps requires the risk category to be specified, even though that category is not necessary for determining S DS and S D1. 2 2012 IBC SEAOC Structural/Seismic Design Manual, Vol. 1

Design Example 2 n Design Response Spectrum 11.4.5 Design Example 2 Design Response Spectrum 11.4.5 PROBLEM STATEMENT A building site in California has the following design spectral response acceleration parameters determined in accordance with Section 11.4.4 and mapped long-period transition period evaluated from Figure 22-12: S DS = 0.55g S D1 = 0.34g T L = 8 sec. DETERMINE THE FOLLOWING: 1. Design response spectrum. 1. Design Response Spectrum 11.4.5 Section 11.4.5 provides the equations for the 5 percent damped spectral response acceleration, S a, relative to period, T, in the following ranges: 0 T < T 0, T 0 T T S, T S < T T L, and T L < T where: T 0 = 0.2 S D1 / S DS, T S = S D1 / S DS, and T L = long-period transition period from Figures 22-12 through 22-16. Given the values above for this example, T 0 = 0.2 S D1 / S DS = 0.2(0.34g / 0.55g) = 0.12 sec T S = S D1 / S DS = (0.34g / 0.55g) = 0.62 sec, and T L = 8 sec. 2012 IBC SEAOC Structural/Seismic Design Manual, Vol. 1 3

11.4.5 Design Example 2 n Design Response Spectrum The spectral response acceleration, S a, is calculated as follows: 1. For the interval 0 T < T 0 (0 T < 0.12 s), S a = S DS (0.4 + 0.6T/T 0 ) Eq 11.4-5 S a = 0.55g(0.4+0.6T/0.12) = (0.22 + 2.75T)g. 2. For the interval T 0 T T S (0.12 s T 0.62 s), S a = S DS = 0.55g. 3. For the interval T S < T T L (0.62 s < T 8 s), S a = S D1 /T Eq 11.4-6 S a = (0.34/T)g. 4. For the interval T L < T (8 s < T), S a = S D1 T L /T 2 Eq 11.4-7 S a = 0.34g(8)/T 2 = (2.72/T 2 )g. From this information, the elastic design response spectrum for this site can be drawn, as shown below, in accordance with Figure 11.4-1: T (sec) S a (g) 0.00 0.22 0.12 0.55 0.62 0.55 0.75 0.45 1.00 0.34 1.50 0.23 2.00 0.17 4.00 0.09 8.00 0.04 10.00 0.03 4 2012 IBC SEAOC Structural/Seismic Design Manual, Vol. 1

Design Example 2 n Design Response Spectrum 11.4.5 Figure 2-1. Design response spectrum per Section 11.4.5 2012 IBC SEAOC Structural/Seismic Design Manual, Vol. 1 5