Magnetic / Gravity Loading Analysis



Similar documents
Stresses in Beam (Basic Topics)

Numerical modelling of shear connection between concrete slab and sheeting deck

EFFECTS ON NUMBER OF CABLES FOR MODAL ANALYSIS OF CABLE-STAYED BRIDGES

SEISMIC DESIGN. Various building codes consider the following categories for the analysis and design for earthquake loading:

Aluminium systems profile selection

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESPONSE - FACULTY OF LAND RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING -BUCHAREST

Bearing strength of stainless steel bolted plates in tension

MONDOATHENS BASKETBALL SET (Reference PK110)

Precision Miniature Load Cell. Models 8431, 8432 with Overload Protection

Optimum proportions for the design of suspension bridge

FOUNDATION DESIGN. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples

Stress Strain Relationships

Design of Impact Load Testing Machine for COT

ARP5765 : Analytical Methods for Aircraft Seat Design and Evaluation Prasanna Bhonge, PhD Cessna Aircraft Company Wichita, KS 7 August 2012

Profile rail guides LLR

ENGINEERING SCIENCE H1 OUTCOME 1 - TUTORIAL 3 BENDING MOMENTS EDEXCEL HNC/D ENGINEERING SCIENCE LEVEL 4 H1 FORMERLY UNIT 21718P

REHABILITATION OF THE FIGUEIRA DA FOZ BRIDGE

B) 286 m C) 325 m D) 367 m Answer: B

MECHANICS OF SOLIDS - BEAMS TUTORIAL 2 SHEAR FORCE AND BENDING MOMENTS IN BEAMS

Page 1 of Sven Alexander Last revised SB-Produksjon STATICAL CALCULATIONS FOR BCC 250

Physics 11 Assignment KEY Dynamics Chapters 4 & 5

Detailing of Reinforcment in Concrete Structures

Submittal Information

C B A T 3 T 2 T What is the magnitude of the force T 1? A) 37.5 N B) 75.0 N C) 113 N D) 157 N E) 192 N

INTRODUCTION TO BEAMS

F N A) 330 N 0.31 B) 310 N 0.33 C) 250 N 0.27 D) 290 N 0.30 E) 370 N 0.26

Chapter 4. Forces and Newton s Laws of Motion. continued

MASTER DEGREE PROJECT

Technology of EHIS (stamping) applied to the automotive parts production

P4 Stress and Strain Dr. A.B. Zavatsky MT07 Lecture 3 Statically Indeterminate Structures

DESIGN OF SLABS. 3) Based on support or boundary condition: Simply supported, Cantilever slab,

CONTRIBUTION TO THE IAEA SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION KARISMA BENCHMARK

T1-40 T1-40BF T1-40V T1-38 T1-38BF T1-38V

PHYS 211 FINAL FALL 2004 Form A

DryLin ZLW Belt Drive

Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Structures in Design and Structural Assessment

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar. Fig some of the trusses that are used in steel bridges

STRESS AND DEFORMATION ANALYSIS OF LINEAR ELASTIC BARS IN TENSION

Nonlinear analysis and form-finding in GSA Training Course

Design MEMO 54a Reinforcement design for RVK 41

CRITERIA FOR PRELOADED BOLTS

Fric-3. force F k and the equation (4.2) may be used. The sense of F k is opposite

AP Physics: Rotational Dynamics 2

At the skate park on the ramp

B.TECH. (AEROSPACE ENGINEERING) PROGRAMME (BTAE) Term-End Examination December, 2011 BAS-010 : MACHINE DESIGN

Weight Measurement Technology

Development of High Stability Supports for NSLS-II RF BPMS

Draft Table of Contents. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary ACI

Physics 125 Practice Exam #3 Chapters 6-7 Professor Siegel

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF STRUCTURES

AN EXPLANATION OF JOINT DIAGRAMS

LCWM Glossary. Mettler Toledo LCWM Glossary

Differential Relations for Fluid Flow. Acceleration field of a fluid. The differential equation of mass conservation

Simulation for the Collapse of WTC after Aeroplane Impact

Lecture 07: Work and Kinetic Energy. Physics 2210 Fall Semester 2014

Lap Fillet Weld Calculations and FEA Techniques

Analysis and Repair of an Earthquake-Damaged High-rise Building in Santiago, Chile

Rail Track Analysis User Manual. LUSAS Version 15.0 : Issue 1

Blast Proof Occupied Buildings

THE DESIGN OF BUILDING SERVICES FOR EARTHQUAKE RESISTANCE

METHOD OF STATEMENT FOR STATIC LOADING TEST

PHY231 Section 2, Form A March 22, Which one of the following statements concerning kinetic energy is true?

Design MEMO 60 Reinforcement design for TSS 102

SEISMIC RETROFITTING TECHNIQUE USING CARBON FIBERS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS

PHY231 Section 1, Form B March 22, 2012

ANALYSIS OF A LAP JOINT FRICTION CONNECTION USING HIGH STRENGTH BOLTS

LEGACY REPORT ER ICC Evaluation Service, Inc. Reissued November 1, Legacy report on the 1997 Uniform Building Code

Journal bearings/sliding bearings

Bearing Stiffness Determination through Vibration Analysis of Shaft Line of Bieudron Hydro Powerplant

Chapter Outline. Mechanical Properties of Metals How do metals respond to external loads?

Optimising plate girder design

Behaviour of Prefabricated Timber Wall Elements Under Static and Cyclic Loading

Practice Test SHM with Answers

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

Introduction to Solid Modeling Using SolidWorks 2012 SolidWorks Simulation Tutorial Page 1

Dynamic Load and Stress Analysis of a Crankshaft

Damping Wigglers in PETRA III

Fraunhofer Diffraction

Objectives. Experimentally determine the yield strength, tensile strength, and modules of elasticity and ductility of given materials.

PREASSEMBLED ELEMENTS FOR LIFTING AND SLIDING DOORS

Basics of Reinforced Concrete Design

Structural Axial, Shear and Bending Moments

! n. Problems and Solutions Section 1.5 (1.66 through 1.74)

Solid Mechanics. Stress. What you ll learn: Motivation

Connection Solutions

Problem Set 1. Ans: a = 1.74 m/s 2, t = 4.80 s

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS OF TUNED/HYBRID MASS DAMPERS USING MULTI-STAGE RUBBER BEARINGS FOR VIBRATION CONTROL OF STRUCTURES

State Newton's second law of motion for a particle, defining carefully each term used.

WR and HERM Applications: CR Applications:

COMPUTATIONAL ACCURACY ANALYSIS OF A COORDINATE MEASURING MACHINE UNDER STATIC LOAD

STATIC STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF SUSPENSION ARM USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

Introduction to Mechanical Behavior of Biological Materials

AP Physics C Fall Final Web Review

PHY121 #8 Midterm I

NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF SEISMIC ISOLATION FOR SINGLE- TOWER CABLE STAYED BRIDGES

Transcription:

Magnetic / Gravity Loading Analysis

2 ELEMENTS JUL 7 2006 ELEMENTS MAT NUM 2:5:0 MAT NUM POR Design JUL 7 2006 2:5:0 L2 L L q Assumed Location of Gap Encoder(s) ELEMENTS MAT NUM JUL 7 2006 2:5:0 Materials: 606 Aluminum Mild Steel Stainless Steel Finite Element Model 26288 Nodes 7485 Elements Linear bricks, parabolic tets, linear springs, tension only spars (turnbuckles - nonlinear), surface effect elements (for longitudinal and transverse magnetic load application) Pressure loads applied for magnetic loading No symmetry assumption L = 050 mm L2 = 000 mm L = 500 mm 2

POR Design K x = 2800 N / µ K roll = 8 knm / K pitch / yaw = 72 knm / K z = 2667 N / µ Linear Bearing Block Stiffness 8 linear springs per block acting between block / rail 4 springs acting in (Down / Lift off / Roll / Pitch) 4 springs acting in (Side / aw) Spring spacing (y / z) adjusted for angular stiffness (Pitch / Roll / aw)

Gravity Load NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Gravity and Vertical Magnetic Load Transverse Deflection Vertical Magnetic Load 0,000 N @ Min Gap & 0mm phase U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.25797 S =-.040 SM =.26995 22:56:49 M 2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.25797 S =-.040 SM =.26995 M 22:56:49 STEP=2 TIME=2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.05855 S =-.00682 SM =.02 M 2:0:0 2 STEP=2 TIME=2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.05855 S =-.00682 SM =.02 M 2:0:0 -.040.0975.0952.0647.09007.5485.40862.6624.967.26995 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.25797 S =-.040 SM =.26995 -.040.0975.0952.0647.09007.5485.40862.6624.967.26995 M 22:56:49 -.00682.00867.00565.0926.027962 -.002482.00626.0494.0262.02 STEP=2 TIME=2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.05855 S =-.00682 SM =.02 -.00682.00867.00565.0926.027962 -.002482.00626.0494.0262.02 M 2:0:0 -.040.0975.0952.0647.09007.5485.40862.6624.967.26995 -.00682 -.002482.00867.00626.00565.0494.0926.0262.027962.02 Vertical force on the top girder for the inclined plane mode 4

Gravity Load NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Gravity and Vertical Magnetic Load Vertical Deflection Vertical Magnetic Load 0,000 N @ Min Gap & 0mm phase U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.25797 S =-.464 SM =.00246 M 22:57:2 2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.25797 S =-.464 SM =.00246 M 22:57:2 STEP=2 TIME=2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.05855 S =-.056408 SM =.04922 M 2:0:26 2 STEP=2 TIME=2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.05855 S =-.056408 SM =.04922 M 2:0:26 -.464 -.0967 -.077594 -.04557 -.25628 -.09605 -.0658 -.02956 -.0548.00246 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.25797 S =-.464 SM =.00246 -.464 -.0967 -.077594 -.04557 -.25628 -.09605 -.0658 -.02956 -.0548.00246 22:57:2 -.056408 -.0295 -.00946 -.044672 -.0298.002276.040.02575.07487.04922 STEP=2 TIME=2 U (AVG) RSS=0 M DM =.05855 S =-.056408 SM =.04922 -.056408 -.0295 -.00946 -.044672 -.0298.002276.040.02575.07487.04922 2:0:26 M -.464 -.25628 -.0967 -.09605 -.077594 -.0658 -.04557 -.02956 -.0548.00246 -.056408 -.044672 -.0295 -.0298 -.00946.002276.040.02575.07487.04922 Vertical force on the top girder for the inclined plane mode 5

Girder Vertical Deformation (mm) 0.00 0.009 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.004 0.00 0.002 0.00 0.000-0.00-0.002-0.00-0.004 NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Vertical Magnetic Load NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Normalized (0 @ Encoder Locations) Girder Deformation along Tranverse Center Vertical Magnetic Load @ Minimum Gap Upper Girder Lower Girder Gap Change 2 th Order Polynomial Fit -0.005-2000-750-500-250-000 -750-500 -250 0 250 500 750 000 250 500 750 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 2 th Order Polynomial Fit used for Phase Error Calculations in B2E (Igor) 6

Vertical Magnetic Load Phase Error Photon Phase Error ( ).0 2.0.0 0.0 -.0-2.0 -.0 NSRRC EPU Photon Phase Error from Girder Defl. RMS Phase Error =.2 (Min Gap - Inclined Plane Mode - 0mm Phase) 0 20 40 60 80 Pole # 00 20 40 60 7

0.052 NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Vertical Magnetic Load NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Total Girder Deflection along Tranverse Center Vertical Magnetic Load @ Minimum Gap Total Girder Vertical Deflection (mm) 0.050 0.048 0.046 0.044 0.042 0.040-0.046-0.048-0.050-0.052-0.054-0.056 Upper Girder Lower Girder -0.058-2000-750-500-250-000-750-500 -250 0 250 500 750 000 250 500 750 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 8

-.8 NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Vertical Magnetic Load NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Girder Angular Deflection about Longitudinal Center Vertical Magnetic Load @ Minimum Gap -4.0 Girder Angular Deflection ( -rad) -4.2-4.4-4.6-7.0-4.8-7.2-7.4-7.6-7.8-8.0 Upper Girder Lower Girder -8.2-2000-750-500-250-000 -750-500 -250 0 250 500 750 000 250 500 750 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 9

Gravity Load Total Girder Vertical Deflection (mm) -0.7-0.8-0.9-0.20-0.2-0.22-0.2-0.24-0.25-0.26 NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Total Girder Deflection along Tranverse Center Gravity Load @ Minimum Gap Upper Girder Lower Girder Note Tilt in EPU; Turnbuckles not active for gravity load simulation Tilt will be adjusted for during setup Leftmost (+ in FE Model) support pedestal exhibits slightly lower stiffness compared to center and rightmost (-) pedestals -0.27-2000-750-500-250-000-750-500 -250 0 250 500 750 000 250 500 750 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 0

Girder Angular Deflection ( -rad) -24.00-24.25-24.50-24.75-25.00-25.25-25.50-25.75-26.00-26.25-26.50-26.75-27.00-27.25 NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Gravity Load NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Girder Angular Deflection about Longitudinal Center Gravity Load @ Minimum Gap Upper Girder Lower Girder -27.50-2000-750-500-250-000-750-500 -250 0 250 500 750 000 250 500 750 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm)

Transverse & Longitudinal Magnetic Load 2 ELEMENTS JUL 2 2006 ELEMENTS MAT NUM 0:48:06 MAT NUM JUL 2 2006 0:48:06 ELEMENTS MAT NUM JUL 2 2006 0:48:06 Traction Loads Applied @ Opposing Magnet Faces Finite Element Model (Full Model) 2

Transverse Deflection NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Transverse Magnetic Load Vertical Deflection U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.00745 S =-.00245 SM =.0062 M 22:02:29 2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.00745 S =-.00245 SM =.0062 M 22:02:29 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.00745 S =-.00565 SM =.64E-0 M 22:0:9 2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.00745 S =-.00565 SM =.64E-0 M 22:0:9 -.00245 -.0002.0E-0.00626.00295 -.0068 -.59E-0.964E-0.002288.0062 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.00745 S =-.00245 SM =.0062 M -.00245 -.0002.0E-0.00626.00295 -.0068 -.59E-0.964E-0.002288.0062 22:02:29 -.00565 -.0008 -.596E-0 -.2E-0.72E-0 -.002 -.89E-0 -.54E-0.0E-0.64E-0 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.00745 S =-.00565 SM =.64E-0 M -.00565 -.0008 -.596E-0 -.2E-0.72E-0 -.002 -.89E-0 -.54E-0.0E-0.64E-0 22:0:9 -.00245 -.0068 -.0002 -.59E-0.0E-0.964E-0.00626.002288.00295.0062 -.00565 -.002 -.0008 -.89E-0 -.596E-0 -.54E-0 -.2E-0.0E-0.72E-0.64E-0 Transverse force on the top girder for the inclined plane mode Transverse Magnetic Load,000 N @ Min Gap &.5mm phase

0.0000 NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Transverse Magnetic Load Transverse Deflection NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Girder Transverse Deflection @ Longitudinal Center Transverse Magnetic Load @ Minimum Gap Girder Transverse Deflection (mm) 0.00275 0.00250 0.00225-0.0025-0.0050 Upper Girder Lower Girder -0.0075-2000 -500-000 -500 0 500 000 500 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 4

-0.00020 NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Transverse Magnetic Load Vertical Deflection NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Girder Vertical Deflection @ Longitudinal Center Transverse Magnetic Load @ Minimum Gap Girder Vertical Deflection (mm) -0.00025-0.0000-0.0005-0.00040-0.00045 Upper Girder Lower Girder -0.00050-2000 -500-000 -500 0 500 000 500 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 5

7.2 NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Transverse Magnetic Load Angular Deflection NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Girder Angular Deflection about Longitudinal Center Transverse Magnetic Load @ Minimum Gap Girder Angular Deflection ( -rad) 7.0 6.8 6.6 6.4 6.2 6.0 5.8 Upper Girder Lower Girder 5.6-2000 -500-000 -500 0 500 000 500 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 6

Transverse Deflection NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Longitudinal Magnetic Load Vertical Deflection U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.06907 S =-.04958 SM =.0576 M 2 2:47:55 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.06907 S =-.04958 SM =.0576 M 2:47:55 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.06907 S =-.02508 SM =.024988 M 2:48:9 2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.06907 S =-.02508 SM =.024988 M 2:48:9 -.04958 -.0982.002295.02442.046548 -.00895 -.008768.058.05485.0576 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.06907 S =-.04958 SM =.0576 -.04958 -.0982.002295.02442.046548 -.00895 -.008768.058.05485.0576 M 2:47:55 -.02508 -.0262 -.097 -.006954.00582.086 -.02508 -.04 -.566E-0.022.024988 -.0262 -.097 -.006954.00582.086 -.04 -.566E-0.022.024988 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.06907 S =-.02508 SM =.024988 M 2:48:9 -.04958 -.00895 -.0982 -.008768.002295.058.02442.05485.046548.0576 -.02508 -.0262 -.097 -.04 -.006954 -.566E-0.00582.022.086.024988 Longitudinal force on the top girder for the inclined plane mode Longitudinal Magnetic Load 25,000 N @ Min Gap &.5mm phase 7

Longitudinal Magnetic Load Longitudinal Deflection U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.06907 S =-.02089 SM =.0895 2:48:4 M 2 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.06907 S =-.02089 SM =.0895 M 2:48:4 -.02089 -.007595.005704.09002.020 -.04244 -.946E-0.025.02565.0895 U (AVG) RSS=0 DM =.06907 S =-.02089 SM =.0895 -.02089 -.007595.005704.09002.020 -.04244 -.946E-0.025.02565.0895 M 2:48:4 -.02089 -.04244 -.007595 -.946E-0.005704.025.09002.02565.020.0895 Longitudinal force on the top girder for the inclined plane mode Longitudinal Magnetic Load 25,000 N @ Min Gap &.5mm phase 8

0.06 NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Longitudinal Magnetic Load Transverse Deflection NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Girder Transverse Deflection @ Longitudinal Center Longitudinal Magnetic Load @ Minimum Gap Girder Transverse Deflection (mm) 0.04 0.02 0.00-0.02-0.04 Upper Girder Lower Girder -2000-500 -000-500 0 500 000 500 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 9

Girder Vertical Deflection (mm) 0.00 0.025 0.020 0.05 0.00 0.005 0.000-0.005-0.00-0.05-0.020-0.025-0.00 NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Longitudinal Magnetic Load Vertical Deflection NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Girder Vertical Deflection @ Longitudinal Center Longitudinal Magnetic Load @ Minimum Gap Upper Girder Lower Girder Gap Change After Seismic analysis, runs will be attempted to force gap centerline back to zero and evaluate subsequent bearing loads. Thermal loads will be applied to ball screws to force expansion / contraction -0.05-2000 -500-000 -500 0 500 000 500 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 20

Longitudinal Magnetic Load Angular Deflection NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Girder Angular Deflection about Longitudinal Center Longitudinal Magnetic Load @ Minimum Gap 5 Girder Angular Deflection ( -rad) 0 5 0-5 -0-5 -20 Upper Girder Lower Girder -25-2000 -500-000 -500 0 500 000 500 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 2

0.075 NSRRC EPU - Girder Analysis Longitudinal Magnetic Load Longitudinal Deflection NSRRC EPU Strongback Outer Uprights (L=050mm. L2=000, L=500mm) Girder Longitudinal Deflection @ Longitudinal Center Longitudinal Magnetic Load @ Minimum Gap Girder Longitudinal Deflection (mm) 0.050 0.025 0.000 0.0275-0.025-0.050-0.075 Upper Girder Lower Girder -0.0200-2000 -500-000 -500 0 500 000 500 2000 Distance from Girder Center (mm) 22

Equivalent Stress(es) due to Gravity Loading Mild Steel Components Aluminum Components DM =.9769 S =909.688 SM =.79E+08 M JUL 2 2006 :27: 2 DM =.9769 S =909.688 SM =.79E+08 M JUL 2 2006 :27: DM =.25797 S =224.99 SM =.65E+07 M JUL 2 2006 :24:49 2 DM =.25797 S =224.99 SM =.65E+07 M JUL 2 2006 :24:49 909.688.84E+07.69E+08.25E+08.7E+08.422E+07.26E+08.2E+08.295E+08.79E+08 DM =.9769 S =909.688 SM =.79E+08 M 909.688.84E+07.69E+08.25E+08.7E+08.422E+07.26E+08.2E+08.295E+08.79E+08 JUL 2 2006 :27: 224.99.45E+07.289E+07.44E+07.579E+07 7289.27E+07.62E+07.507E+07.65E+07 DM =.25797 S =224.99 SM =.65E+07 M 224.99.45E+07.289E+07.44E+07.579E+07 7289.27E+07.62E+07.507E+07.65E+07 JUL 2 2006 :24:49 909.688.422E+07.84E+07.26E+08.69E+08.2E+08.25E+08.295E+08.7E+08.79E+08 224.99 7289.45E+07.27E+07.289E+07.62E+07.44E+07.507E+07.579E+07.65E+07 All nominal component stresses at least order of magnitude lower than yield stress of constituent material 2

Equivalent Stress(es) due to Vertical Magnetic Loading Mild Steel Components Aluminum Components STEP=2 TIME=2 TOP DM =.05855 S =.4895 SM =.87E+08 JUL 2 2006 :6:00 M 2 STEP=2 TIME=2 TOP DM =.05855 S =.4895 SM =.87E+08 M JUL 2 2006 :6:00 STEP=2 TIME=2 TOP DM =.05855 S =460.265 SM =.5E+08 JUL 2 2006 :8:26 M 2 STEP=2 TIME=2 TOP DM =.05855 S =460.265 SM =.5E+08 M JUL 2 2006 :8:26.4895.860E+07.72E+08.258E+08.44E+08.40E+07.29E+08.25E+08.0E+08.87E+08 STEP=2 TIME=2 TOP DM =.05855 S =.4895 SM =.87E+08.4895.860E+07.72E+08.258E+08.44E+08.40E+07.29E+08.25E+08.0E+08.87E+08 M JUL 2 2006 :6:00 460.265.0E+07.60E+07.90E+07.20E+08.50E+07.45E+07.75E+07.05E+08.5E+08 STEP=2 TIME=2 TOP DM =.05855 S =460.265 SM =.5E+08 460.265.0E+07.60E+07.90E+07.20E+08.50E+07.45E+07.75E+07.05E+08.5E+08 M JUL 2 2006 :8:26.4895.40E+07.860E+07.29E+08.72E+08.25E+08.258E+08.0E+08.44E+08.87E+08 460.265.50E+07.0E+07.45E+07.60E+07.75E+07.90E+07.05E+08.20E+08.5E+08 All nominal component stresses at least order of magnitude lower than yield stress of constituent material 24

Equivalent Stress(es) due to Longitudinal Magnetic Loading Mild Steel Components Aluminum Components DM =.068697 S =7.59 SM =.74E+08 M JUL 2 2006 :7:2 2 DM =.068697 S =7.59 SM =.74E+08 M JUL 2 2006 :7:2 DM =.06775 S =8.25 SM =.46E+07 M JUL 2 2006 :4:09 2 DM =.06775 S =8.25 SM =.46E+07 M JUL 2 2006 :4:09 7.59.86E+07.772E+07.6E+08.54E+08.9E+07.579E+07.965E+07.5E+08.74E+08 DM =.068697 S =7.59 SM =.74E+08 7.59.86E+07.772E+07.6E+08.54E+08.9E+07.579E+07.965E+07.5E+08.74E+08 M JUL 2 2006 :7:2 8.25 969984.94E+07.29E+07.88E+07 48508.45E+07.242E+07.9E+07.46E+07 DM =.06775 S =8.25 SM =.46E+07 M 8.25 969984.94E+07.29E+07.88E+07 48508.45E+07.242E+07.9E+07.46E+07 JUL 2 2006 :4:09 7.59.9E+07.86E+07.579E+07.772E+07.965E+07.6E+08.5E+08.54E+08.74E+08 8.25 969984 48508.45E+07.94E+07.242E+07.29E+07.9E+07.88E+07.46E+07 All nominal component stresses at least order of magnitude lower than yield stress of constituent material 25

Modal / Siesmic Analysis Note that in order to estimate actual deflections from modal analysis results, two items are required; Reasonable estimate of damping can be obtained from measurements of multiple EPU s Quantitative data from floor vibration measurements 26

Modal Analysis / Seismic Analysis 997 UBC Ch 6 Section 627 Definitions Component, Flexible, is a component, including its attachments, having a fundamental period greater than 0.06 second (Fn < 7.67 Hz) st Three Modes Primarily Support Hardware Mode 7.4 Hz Mode 2 27.6 Hz Note: Must be viewed in Slide Show mode to view animations 27

Modal Analysis / Seismic Analysis 997 UBC Ch 6 Section 627 Definitions Component, Flexible, is a component, including its attachments, having a fundamental period greater than 0.06 second (Fn < 7.67 Hz) st Three Modes Primarily Support Hardware Mode 5.2 Hz Note: Must be viewed in Slide Show mode to view animations 28

997 UBC Ch 6 Section 627 Definitions Component, Flexible, is a component, including its attachments, having a fundamental period greater than 0.06 second (Fn < 7.67 Hz) st Three Significant Internal Modes Mode 7 2.4 Hz Mode 8.2 Hz Note: Must be viewed in Slide Show mode to view animations 29

997 UBC Ch 6 Section 627 Definitions Component, Flexible, is a component, including its attachments, having a fundamental period greater than 0.06 second (Fn < 7.67 Hz) st Three Significant Internal Modes Mode 0 45.7 Hz Note: Must be viewed in Slide Show mode to view animations 0

Seismic Analysis 997 UBC Ch 6 Section 62 Lateral Force on Elements of Structures, Nonstructural Components and Equipment Supported by Structures Fp = a p C a I p (+h x /h r ) W p / R p a p = 2.5 for flexible components with ductile materials, UBC Table 6-O C a = 0.4 Na (Seismic coefficients) N a =. I p =.5 (Importance Factor) R p =.0 (UBC Table 6-O) W p = Component Weight = 8,8 Kg h x = 0 (ground level) F p = 0.65 W p F p = 56,04 N - acceleration(s)) Force to be applied at C.G. of structure (0.65 g horizontal

4 ELEMENTS MAT NUM JUL 2 2006 2:26:05 Finite Element Model for Seismic Evaluation Tension only links included Contact surface steel plate to floor Monitor reactions at anchor locations used as input to NSRRC for anchor selection F p applied as horizontal acceleration(s) +/- & + directions Gravity set @ 0.5 g downward ground acceleration of 0.65 g resulting in greatest tensile anchor loads Support Support Support 2 Anchor Node Numbers 2

Seismic analysis results expected by 7/2/06 The following results are from SLAC analysis of seismic loads on adjuster feet and are included for reference only. NSRRC loads are expected to be ~0% lower due to reduced weight.

- (Transverse) Horizontal Load Results ELEMENTS F MAR 5 2006 2:9:57 S (AVG) DM =.208066 S =-.595E+08 SM =.06E+09 MAR 9 2006 04:5:0 -.565E+09.25E+ Restraints File: differential thread kinematic mount Support Foot: 440C Stainless Rc=57 : σ y = 895 MPa σ u = 964 MPa Shear Loads Applied @ Ball Socket (Support in Table below) M -.595E+08 -.89E+08.27E+08.62E+08.0E+09.4E+09.84E+09.225E+09.265E+09.06E+09 File: differential thread kinematic mount Differential Adjuster Foot Loads NODE F (N) F (N) F (N) M (N-mm) M (N-mm) M (N-mm) Support Support Support 2 2208 2.6E+04 5.05E+04 -.25E+0 0 0 0 2209-2.6E+04-5.05E+04.25E+0 -.58E+05 0-2.98E+06 22020 0 0 0 0 0 0 2202.04E+04 0.00E+00-5.8E+02 0 0 0 22022 -.04E+04 0.00E+00 5.8E+02-6.97E+04 0 -.65E+06 2202 0 0 0 0 0 0 22026 2.50E+04 5.07E+04.8E+0 0 0 0 22027-2.50E+04-5.07E+04 -.8E+0 2.9E+05 0-2.99E+06 22028 0 0 0 0 0 0 Support Foot Stress Max. (Principle) Stress = 06 MPa Ball Node EPU Floor Node Center Node Ball Node EPU Floor Node Center Node Ball Node EPU Floor Node Center Node Resultant Shear Load 262.9749 045.5548 25026.99542 4

+ (Longitudinal) Horizontal Load Results ELEMENTS F MAR 5 2006 2:9:57 S (AVG) DM =.8529 S =-.59E+08 SM =.229E+09 MAR 6 2006 2:57: -.565E+09.25E+ Restraints M File: differential thread kinematic mount Support Foot: 440C Stainless Rc=57 : σ y = 895 MPa σ u = 964 MPa Shear Loads Applied @ Ball Socket (Support in Table below) -.59E+08 -.644E+07.20E+08.525E+08.820E+08.E+09.4E+09.70E+09.200E+09.229E+09 File: differential thread kinematic mount Differential Adjuster Foot Loads NODE F (N) F (N) F (N) M (N-mm) M (N-mm) M (N-mm) Support Support Support 2 2208.67E+0 4.64E+04-24590 0 0 0 2209 -.67E+0-4.64E+04 2.46E+04-0000 0.00E+00-2.0E+05 22020 0 0 0 0 0 0 2202-8.8E+02.E+04-2750 0 0 0 22022 8.8E+02 -.E+04 2.75E+04-297000 0.00E+00 9.8E+04 2202 0 0 0 0 0 0 22026-8.47E+02 0.00E+00-26880 0 0 0 22027 8.47E+02 0.00E+00 2.69E+04-222000 0.00E+00.02E+05 22028 0 0 0 0 0 0 Support Foot Stress Max. (Principle) Stress = 2 MPa Ball Node EPU Floor Node Center Node Ball Node EPU Floor Node Center Node Ball Node EPU Floor Node Center Node Resultant Shear Load 24646.0449 27522.675 2689.82 5