Performance Appraisal Form

Similar documents
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade:

Association of Municipal Administrators The Voice of Municipal Administrators

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation. Employee Last First Middle. Probationary progress Conclusion of probation

HR09a ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW (Employee)

Number of employees who report to level of evaluated:

Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATIVE - SUPERVISORY

University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form

Sample Performance Appraisal

Staff Performance Evaluation

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide

County of Orange Department of Fire & EMS Employee Performance Evaluation Company Officer. Hire Date: Period Covered:

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review

Date Started Current Position. Instructions

VHMA Sample Evaluation ( PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance Appraisal

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees

Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report

Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review

POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Classified Employee Performance Assessment

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program

Writing and Conducting Successful Performance Appraisals. Guidelines for Managers and Supervisors

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

Support Services Evaluation Handbook

The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR NON-SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF EVALUATION FORM

Employee Performance Review

Employee Performance Review

Employee Self-Evaluation Form

2. Describe this employee s important accomplishments during the past year. Please provide examples.

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale

RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM

Finance Issue Number 2 Date of Issue: October Credit Controller Job Description

Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications

Cherokee Town and Country Club Front Desk Receptionist. Administrative Employee Performance Evaluation Form

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only)

Setting the Expectation for Success: Performance Management & Appraisal System

CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013

Interview Questions. Accountability. Adaptability

Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees

SAMPLE COMPLETED PERFORMANCE REVIEW FORM

F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM

Employee Development Plan

The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

SOCIETY OF ST. VINCENT DE PAUL OF VANCOUVER ISLAND EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal

Sample Internship Forms

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW

~~4 <l,.p. Human Resources Director

SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form

Cristo Rey High School Sacramento Student Employee Performance Review. Review Guide

Employee Performance Appraisal Form

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Annual Performance Evaluation Form

PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE

2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples

IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide

SPA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GENERAL COMPARISON OF EXPECTATION LEVELS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES

EMPLOYEE INFORMATION

Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers

CONSISTENTLY EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS OF JOB REQUIREMENTS

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

RECREATION LEADER Training Needs Assessment Evaluation Form. Personal/Position Information

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM FY

Total Quality Management

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

PERFORMANCE PLANNING WORKSHEET FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES (PS-35LC)

Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt)

Performance Management Tool 5 Employee Self Evaluation

Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon

Therapist Supervisor

SENIOR SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATOR

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

Transcription:

Performance Appraisal Form

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM EMPLOYEE EVALUATION NAME DATE JOB EVALUATION TITLE PERIOD EVALUATOR: _ 1. Productivity The amount of work an individual does in a work day. What is employee s overall volume of work? Is employee s work level consistent? What is relation between employee s production and the Company s expectations? Below Excellent producer. Consistently generates high volume of work. Produces more than is required or expected. Satisfactory producer. Generates sufficient volume of work with some degree of consistency. Meets expectations or requirements. Unsatisfactory producer. Generates minimal volume of work and/or is inconsistent in level of production. Produces less than is expected or required. 2. Quality of Work Accuracy, neatness and thoroughness of work effort: Does employee take time and care to check work? How frequent are mistakes or errors? How consistent is the accuracy and thoroughness of work? Below Produces outstanding, neat and accurate work. Work must seldom be checked by others. Errors are rare and minor. Average accuracy and neatness for qualified employees. Occasional errors. Reasonably conscientious about checking work and preventing errors. Poor accuracy and neatness. Frequent errors and/or errors of substantial 1

magnitude. Work must be checked by others. Employee shows little concern with quality of work. 3. Knowledge of Job Demonstrates the knowledge of fundamental methods and procedures of job. How often does employee have to be shown job procedures? How does employee handle unexpected problems or breakdowns? Does employee retain knowledge of job or require substantial review? Below Possesses broad and detailed knowledge of all aspects of the job. Rarely needs to ask for job information. Adequate knowledge of phases of work. Possesses knowledge necessary to perform duties. Does not need substantial guidance or direction. Insufficient knowledge of job duties. Has difficulty performing job tasks without substantial guidance and direction. 4. Teamwork Ability to work well with co-workers and supervisors. What level of friction exists between employee and co-workers and supervisors. How does employee react when others disagree or assert authority? Does employee help others? Very good team worker. Gets along well with most people. Cooperative and quick to offer help. Handles disagreement with restraint. Acceptable level of cooperation. Works willingly with others. Offers help to co-workers. 2

Below Causes friction among workers. Responds negatively to disagreement or authority. Refuses to cooperate with or aid co-workers. 5. Independence Ability to work independently, be resourceful and display initiative. Does employee perform functions not specifically given by superiors? Can employee be trusted to work without supervision? Is employee interested in acquiring new skills and knowledge? Below Superior initiative and follow through. Does not require supervision and undertakes tasks on own. Actively seeks to acquire new skills and knowledge. Satisfactory initiative and follow through. Usually does not require supervision or have to be told to perform job functions. Reasonably willing to learn new tasks. Requires substantial supervision and direction to perform job tasks. Not interested in learning or performing any tasks but those required. 6. Records and Reports Ability to produce and maintain written job reports and records. Are written records/reports kept accurately and neatly? Does employee complete written records/reports promptly and without direction? Outstanding management of written records/reports. Completes records/reports accurately and on time. requires little or no supervision. Completes records/reports with satisfactory accuracy. Written records/reports are usually completed on time. 3

Below Suggestions Records/reports completed in sloppy fashion. Completes written records/reports in an untimely manner. Requires supervision to complete written tasks. 7. Guest Service Ability to deal with guests/customers in polite and helpful manner. Does employee pay attention to guest concerns and seek positive resolution? Does employee display common courtesy and positive attitude to guests? Below Comments Treats guests with outstanding level of concern and helpfulness. Follows through on solving customer problems. Consistently courteous and helpful to guests/customers. Satisfactory skills in dealing with guests. Follows through on guest problems to a satisfactory degree. Usually courteous and helpful to guests. Unsatisfactory treatment of guests. Displays rude and unhelpful behavior to guests. Unconcerned with solving guest problems. 8. Safety Ability to comply with precautions for safety of self and others. Is employee knowledgeable of safety policies and procedures? Does employee comply with established safety procedures? Completely knowledgeable of all existing safety policies and procedures. Highly concerned with safety of self and others. Takes all precautions and strictly complies with all safety procedures. Satisfactory level of safety knowledge. Usually concerned with safety of 4

self and others. Takes reasonable precautions and usually complies with all safety procedures. Below Comment 9. Attendance Unsatisfactory level of knowledge of safety of policies and procedures. Fails to take precautions and causes accidents or mishaps. Fails to follow safety procedures. Regularity of attendance and absence for legitimate reasons. How regular is employee s attendance? When absent, does employee do everything possible to minimize disruption? Does employee provide satisfactory reasons for absences? Below Rarely absent and follows established absenteeism procedures. Takes extraordinary steps to minimize disruption and allow replacements to perform tasks. Absent only for legitimate reasons and provides notice when possible. Satisfactory attendance level. Usually follows established absenteeism procedures. Takes satisfactory steps to minimize disruption. Rarely absent for non-legitimate reasons and usually provides notice when possible. Frequently absent. Fails to adhere to absenteeism policies and procedures. Causes disruption by failure to take steps to allow replacements to perform tasks. Absent for non-legitimate reasons and fails to provide notice when reasonable. 10. Leadership and Supervision (Management Only) Ability to plan, organize and supervise so that jobs are completed. Does manager delegate authority when reasonable? Does manager maintain effective working relationships with employees? 5

Does manager plan and organize sufficiently to avoid crisis? Below Overall Superior level of planning and organization. Delegates and assigns all delegable tasks. Achieves outstanding results and maintains superior working relationship with employees. Rarely experiences crisis. Satisfactory planning and organization. Usually delegates and assigns tasks. Maintains effective working relationship with employees. Usually avoids crisis. Poor planning and organization. Fails to delegate tasks to subordinates. Fails to maintain satisfactory working relationships with employees. Frequently experiences crisis. Additional Employer Primary Areas of Future Focus Employee Employee signature does not necessarily mean the employee agrees with the above ratings and comments. It does signify review of the evaluation contents and the opportunity to discuss questions with the evaluator. Employee Signature Date [Original of this Form must be filed in official personnel file for employee] 6