The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
|
|
|
- Asher Sims
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM GENERAL INFORMATION In accordance with Public Service System Rules and Regulations Part 9.1 The performance evaluation system is designed primarily for the purpose of appraising each employee on how well he/she is performing his/her duties and responsibilities; and of indicating areas in his performance where he could be more effective in the application of his knowledge, skill, and abilities. It provides a means for letting the employee know where he stands with the organization. Employee Name: Position Title: Position Type: Ministry/Bureau: Type of Evaluation: Period Covering: Annual Quarterly Periodic Post-Probation 3-Months Probation Other: From To RATING DEFINITIONS 4 - Exceptional Sustained exceptional performance. Achievements are clearly the best among peers or have significance to project outcomes. 3 - Good Consistently exceeds established standards. Performance is significantly better than average. 2 - Satisfactory Performance satisfies the requirements of the job. Performance meets standards set for the position on a consistent basis. 1 - Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet and/or fails standards established for the job. Significant performance improvement needed. Performance at this level could lead to adverse action. SECTION 1: DUTIES & RESPONSIBILITIES: Instructions: Supervisor and employee to review Duties & Responsibilities of employees current Position Description and rate employees knowledge and ability to perform the duties outlined in the PD. Please attach the PD used in the evaluation to this form. Supervisor should have Employee rate self in the Self Appraisal by Employee column first, then Supervisor to enter the rating. NOTE TO SUPERVISOR: Allow employee to self rate FIRST. Both the employee and supervisor to include written comments in APPENDIX A to justify ratings if needed. Section 1 Rating See above for rating definitions. Enter the numerical rating in the appropriate column. Self Appraisal by Employee Supervisor Employee: COMMENTS Job Knowledge Supervisor: Employee: Job Performance based on Key Duties and Responsibilities outlined in the Position Description (attach) Supervisor: TOTAL POINTS FOR SECTION 1 SUPERVISOR'S POSITION/JOB DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATION: By checking this box, I certify that the position description on file for this employee s position is NOT current and needs to be updated. A revised position description will be submitted to the Bureau of Public Service System within one month from signing this form. EMPLOYEE S POSITION DESCRIPTION CERTIFICATION: By checking this box position is NOT current and needs to be updated., I certify that the job description on file for my BPSS Performance Evaluation (Revised 9/2015)
2 SECTION 2: PERFORMANCE COMPETENCIES: Instructions: Employee and Supervisor both enter the score which most adequately describes the employee s ability to demonstrate the performance competencies listed. Use Appendix A if there are comments by both Employee and Supervisor; OR if rating is 4 (exceptional). Please see rating definitions above. NOTE TO SUPERVISOR: Allow employee to self rate FIRST. TO BE COMPLETED FOR ALL POSITIONS Performance Competencies #2A 1) ATTENDANCE/WORK HABITS: Appropriate use of leave, consideration of work load, prompt, appropriate notification of tardiness, maintains required hours, effective use of time. 2) COOPERATION: Ability and willingness to work w/ associates, superiors and others outside the workplace (i.e. customers, other agencies) Develops cooperation while working toward solutions and goals. 3) ADAPTING TO CHANGE: Responds positively to change, showing willingness to learn new ways to accomplish work. 4) COMMUNICATION: Ability to communicate effectively orally & in writing to associates, superiors, and others outside the workplace (i.e. customers, other agencies, etc.) Uses appropriate channels, assumes responsibility for communicating to superiors/coworkers. Shares relevant information. 5) DEPENDABILITY/COMMITMENT TO WORK: Conscientious, responsible, reliable with respect to work completion. Commits fully to the job. Strong work ethic. 6) INITIATIVE: Contributes new ideas; able to work independently toward approved goals; able to take initiative to complete work without being told; Improves working skills and abilities. 7) INTEGRITY: Is widely trusted; is seen as a direct truthful individual, can present the unvarnished truth in an appropriate and helpful manner, keeps confidences, admits mistakes, doesn t misrepresent him/her self for personal gain. 8) LEARNING ABILITY: Readily grasps job requirements. Has a clear understanding of facts or factors pertinent to the job. 9) PRODUCTIVITY: Demonstrated accomplishment, volume of work. Submits assignments timely. Operates with a clear sense of priorities. 10) QUALITY OF WORK: Thoroughness, accuracy and neatness of work. Committed to continuous improvement efforts. Takes appropriate action to reduce errors. 11) SAFETY AWARENESS: Contributes to and encourages a safe work environment. Follows safety rules, follows good practices, and takes proper care of equipment. Total Points For Performance Competencies #2A (All Employees): Performance Competencies #2B Self Appraisal by Employee Self Appraisal Rating The following categories apply only to SUPERVISORY, MANAGERIAL and/or PROFESSIONAL LEVEL (SMP) positions. 1) ATTENDANCE AT TRAINING: Attends supervisory-related training provided by the BPSS and/or Government. 2) LEADERSHIP SKILLS: Employee successfully demonstrates appropriate leadership skills to motivate and encourage employees to be more productive; realizes and complements accomplishments of staff; forward thinking and fosters such abilities in his/her staff; able to recognize and foster potential in his/her 3) MANAGING SUBORDINATES: Effective in evaluating, communicating to, and developing subordinates; to ensure programs and staff under him/her have sufficient funds and proper office tools (equipments) to complete their duties and responsibilities. 4) PROBLEM SOLVING/DECISION MAKING CAPABILITIES: Shows capability to analyze and solve problems requiring analytic or innovative thinking. 5) VISION/MISSION ALIGNMENT: Articulates and implements the vision and mission of the department and Ministry. Sets high expectations for achieving the mission, and personally demonstrates behavior and activities that symbolize and further that mission. Demonstrates the capacity to maintain the departments direction and consistency in meeting their defined strategic objectives. Total POINTS for Performance Competencies #2B: Supervisor Supervisor Page 2 of 6 BPSS Performance Evaluation (Revised 9/2015)
3 SECTION THREE OVERALL SUMMARY RATING BY SUPERVISOR: Instructions: Check ( ) the summary rating that equals that of the employees total Points. For Non-Supervisory/Managerial/Professional Positions, add the total points for Section 1 and Section 2A and check the appropriate points in SUMMARY 1 BOX. For Supervisory, Management, and Professional (SMP) Positions add total points from Section 1 + Section 2A + Section 2B and check the appropriate points in SUMMARY 2 BOX. Note: In accordance with the Public Service System Rules and Regulations Part 9.5,Employees that receive any "Unsatisfactory rating in Sections 1 and/or 2, despite the overall summary rating will be warned and counseled, and lack of improvement may result in disciplinary action. SUMMARY 1: FOR NON-SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL/PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS (Total Points for Section 1 + Section 2A): Exceptional: POINTS and must not have any Unsatisfactory ratings in Sections 1 or 2. Good: POINTS Satisfactory: POINTS Unsatisfactory: 0-13 POINTS SUMMARY 2: FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL/PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS (Total Points for Section 1 + Section 2A + 2B) Exceptional POINTS and must not have any Unsatisfactory ratings in Sections 1 or 2. Good POINTS Satisfactory POINTS Unsatisfactory POINTS SECTION FOUR: INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Instructions: Use this section to highlight strengths, weaknesses, and specific goals or projects for the employee. If there are areas in Section 1 and/or 2 that were rated as Unsatisfactory, identify action plan to improve such areas. Use a separate sheet if more space is needed. NOTE: This form will be returned to department if this section is incomplete. 1. For Supervisor - What do you consider: a. his/her strong points or things he/she does well at? b. areas he/she could improve on? What steps are being taken to strengthen this (or these) areas for opportunity? Page 3 of 6 BPSS Performance Evaluation (Revised 9/2015)
4 2. Problem Areas and Action Plan List any areas that were rated as Unsatisfactory and/or just areas that supervisor and employee think needs improvement and identify action plan to improve each area. Page 4 of 6 BPSS Performance Evaluation (Revised 9/2015)
5 3. Goals, tasks, projects, activities, etc. for the upcoming year. Both supervisor and employee should discuss and list down these goals and include a timeline to help guide employee: 4. For Employee - In what ways do you believe that your supervisor/manager could help to improve your performance and professional growth on future assignments? SECTION FIVE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEWS: EMPLOYEE: By signing below, I acknowledge that this evaluation was reviewed with me by my supervisor. Print Name Signature: Date: RATER: Print Name Signature: Date: AUTHORIZED MANAGEMENT OFFICIAL: Print Name Signature: Date: Page 5 of 6 BPSS Performance Evaluation (Revised 9/2015)
6 APPENDIX A: Use and attach this sheet if Additional Comments is needed. Section 1 Job Knowledge Job Performance Section 2 Page 6 of 6 BPSS Performance Evaluation (Revised 9/2015)
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees PART I PURPOSE DePauw University s performance appraisal process is based upon the belief that employees are our most critical resource,
Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide
Employee Performance Review Reference Guide Oklahoma Baptist University Office of Human Resources March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Why Review?... 1 The Ratings... 1 Managerial Elements... 1 Leadership...
The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions
Performance Appraisal Instructions Instructions: A current job description is needed to complete this performance appraisal. Essential tasks are numbered on the job description, and these task numbers
PERFORMANCE REVIEW NON- UNIT PROFESSIONAL
PERFORMANCE REVIEW NON- UNIT PROFESSIONAL Name: Title: Hire Date: Employee ID #: Department: Date Started in Position: Evaluation Period: Performance Review Attach the employee s current job description.
Performance Appraisal
PURPOSE Performance Appraisal 90-day Evaluation 180-day Evaluation Annual Evaluation The purpose of any performance appraisal program is employee development. The value of performance appraisal is in the
Association of Municipal Administrators The Voice of Municipal Administrators
Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Municipal Administrators The Voice of Municipal Administrators EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS INTRODUCTION This performance appraisal form captures the basic
STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Name Social Security No Job Title Organizational Unit State Employment Date Current Job
Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review
Name: Review Period: Job Title: Reviewer: Note: Place a mark in the appropriate space which describes the performance of the person named, as determined by this appraisal. Use the following codes and definitions.
Employee s Name: Susan Jones. Title: Administrative Officer. Supervisor: Marcia Meadows. Date: April 2, 200x
Employee s Name: Susan Jones Title: Administrative Officer Descriptive Performance Review Form Job Definition Supervisor: Marcia Meadows Date: April 2, 200x 1. Attach a current position description; if
SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES
NIPISSING UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE EVALUATION The purpose of this employee evaluation is to assess performance/skill levels, improve communication and pin-point strengths and weaknesses identified
Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale
Employee Name Employee ID Number Job Title Department Reviewing Supervisor Review Period Period Supervised by Reviewing Supervisor Period Employee in this Job Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating
Employee Performance Appraisal Form
Employee Performance Appraisal Form Employee Name: Job Title: Department: Performance Review Period: From: JANUARY 1, 2013 To: DECEMBER 31, 2013 Written By: Title: Department: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Complete
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT
BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2010 Review Date 2015 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous policies Page 1 of 12 Identification HR-4540 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name: Job Title: Date: Department: Type of Appraisal: Annual Probationary Self Evaluation Appraisal Period: From: To: Instructions: Please carefully review the employee
ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES
ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES DATE: Name: Position: Department: Annual Performance Review COPY MUST BE RETURNED TO HR FOR FILE Part 1: of General Performance
Utica College Performance Review Form
Utica College Performance Review Form EMPLOYEE NAME: DEPARTMENT: HIRE DATE: / / SUPERVISOR*: JOB TITLE: REVIEW PERIOD: From To *Supervisor is the person delivering the review INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING
Employee Development Plan
Form A Employee Development Plan Fiscal Year: EMPLOYEE NAME: TIME IN CURRENT POSITION: DEPARTMENT: This section should be completed by the supervisor and employee as part of the final performance evaluation
Performance Management Tool 5 Employee Self Evaluation
Performance Management Tool 5 Employee Self Evaluation Annual Performance Review Form Employee Self Evaluation Employee Name: Department: Review Period: Criteria EE ME DR Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations
Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other. Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: DRAFT
Last Name First M. Title Department Employee Performance Appraisal Form Employee ID TKL Work Phone Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: Department: Appraisal
STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE
PAGE: 1 of 17 TITLE: EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EPMS) (REVIEW DATE OPTION) POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER: 8-4-100 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY: Human Resource Services DATE OF LAST REVISION: May 13,
Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees
Performance Evaluation Program for Classified Staff Employees Revised July 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Prior to Meeting with Your Supervisor......3 Initial Supervisor/Employee Meeting to Establish Evaluation
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff and Service Personnel Employee s Name (Last, First, MI): Position Title: Department: Period Covered: From: To: Type of Report: Probationary
POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION
CHESWOLD POLICE Department of Public Safety POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION Effective Date: Directive Number: April 15, 2013 10-1-7 Special Instructions: NONE Distribution: All Sworn & Last Re-Evaluation
Employee Self-Evaluation Form
Employee Self-Evaluation Form Employee Name: Job Title: Department: Performance Review Period: From: JANUARY 1, 2013 To: DECEMBER 31, 2013 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Complete each performance area described
Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications
International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 11, November 2013 1 Performance Appraisal System to Improve Construction Productivity paper submitted to International Journal
UCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
UCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Evaluation Period:* to Evaluation Meeting Date: SECTION 1 Employee: Job Title: Employee ID: Department: Immediate Supervisor/Administrator: Title: TYPE OF
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A CONTRACT BETWEEN EMPLOYEES AND WINTHROP UNIVERSITY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS DOCUMENT DOES
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW
TYPE OF APPRAISAL Employee Name First Annual Second Additional Supervisor/Manager Name Appraisal Review Period: Classification Month/Year Month/Year From to Department Date of Appraisal Complete the following
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW GUIDELINES DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES SPRING 2014 Employee Performance Review Guidelines The performance review process helps individual employees and organizations throughout
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION NAME POSITION/TITLE HIRE DATE LOCATION/DEPARTMENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS FT PT PD LAST REVIEW DATE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR DATE: TYPE OF REVIEW: ANNUAL PROBATIONARY OTHER Instructions
F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM
F. PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM GENERAL POLICY It is the policy of Scott County to regularly evaluate the work performance of its employees and provide them with relevant feedback to enable
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Blinn College is the premier two-year college in Texas for those seeking educational excellence in academic programs, technical education, and workforce development. We expect excellence and we encourage
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES NAME: POSITION TITLE: DEPARTMENT/OFFICE: EVALUATED BY BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER: BANNER POSITION NUMBER: REVIEW DATE: Supervisor ID: INSTRUCTIONS:
FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
APPENDIX C FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Philosophy and Policy The performance of all Foothill-De Anza Community College District administrators
Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program
Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program June 2011 Performance Evaluation Guide for Classifed Staff Employees TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble...
AD-AUDITING ACCOUNTANT, SENIOR
Page 1 AD-AUDITING ACCOUNTANT, SENIOR CHARACTERISTICS OF WORK: This is professional accounting work of an "in-charge" nature characterized by an attitude of independence, self-reliance with analytical
Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP
Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP EMPLOYEE NAME: DEPARTMENT: HIRE DATE: / / SUPERVISOR*: JOB TITLE: REVIEW PERIOD: *Supervisor is the person delivering the review From To INSTRUCTIONS
University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade:
University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form Employee Name: Employee Number: Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade: Department Name: Today s : Supervisor
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS INDEX CODE: 707 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07-06-15 Contents: I. Policy II. Objectives of Performance Evaluation III. Elements of the System IV. Responsibilities V. Frequency & Types VI. Utilization
Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals
Colorado Springs School District 11 Dr. Nicholas Gledich, Superintendent Performance Evaluation System Protocol Licensed Executive Professionals Revised March 2014 235169.6 Department of Human Resources
Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)
Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees) Name: Department: Campus ID Number: Title: Review Period: - Job Description Review: I. Essential Job Requirements: (Consider employee s knowledge of duties, responsibilities
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES The City of Corpus Christi's Performance Management Process is designed to: 1. Communicate performance expectations
Senior Executive Service Performance Management System Department of the Interior
Senior Executive Service Performance Management System Department of the Interior 1. System Coverage The Department of the Interior (hereafter referred to as the agency) Senior Executive Service (SES)
GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form
GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form (For RANK and FILE) (Rating Period) (Name) (Position) PART 1 QUANTITATIVE GOALS (60%) INSTRUCTIONS This part is for setting and evaluating the performance of your
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Name Social Security No. Agency Department Position Classification Date Assigned to Current Position Performance Review From To PLANNING STAGE
Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy
Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy Adopted: April 2, 2002 Revised August 4, 2003 I. INTRODUCTION The County of Alexander has recognized the relationship of position classification, job performance,
Annual Performance Evaluation Form
Annual Performance Evaluation Form Instructions & Guidelines Performance Evaluation Form Instructions: The purpose of this performance evaluation form is to establish goals and expectations for the current
Chabot-Las Positas College Community District
Chabot-Las Positas College Community District CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Employee Name (First, Middle, Last): Employee Position Title: Please Check Type of Report Probation: 3-mo, 5-mo;
ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES
ADMINISTRATOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL GUIDELINES The Performance Appraisal Process at Madison College is designed to accomplish the following objectives: Encourage meaningful communication between the employee
Name: Tom Triplett Position Title: Instructional Dean Position Responsibility: BITE and Information Technology Career Majors
Name: Tom Triplett Position Title: Instructional Dean Position Responsibility: BITE and Information Technology Career Majors TTC Position Description: Instructional Dean Official Organizational Title:
Performance Appraisal Handbook
Working Smarter for America The Department of the Interior s Performance Appraisal Handbook A Guide for Managers/Supervisors and Employees Office of the Secretary Office of Human Resources 10/4/04 #370DM430HB-1
Performance Appraisal System
SUPERVISORY MANUAL Performance Appraisal System For a New Century State Workforce State of Hawaii Department of Human Resources Development July 1, 2001 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM POLICY STATEMENT Public
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #:
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY CLASSIFIED PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL RECORD FOR SUPERVISORY/MANAGERIAL EMPLOYEES EMPLOYEE NAME: EMPLOYEE IDENTIFICATION #: JOB TITLE: REVIEWED BY: UNIT: DATE OF REVIEW: REVIEW
Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal
Professional & Scientific Performance Appraisal Employee s Name: Employee s University ID #: Employee s Title: Department: Date Employee Began Current Position: Review Period: From: To: Supervisor s Name:
Manager / Supervisor Performance Review
Manager / Supervisor Performance Review SECTION 1 Personal Information (Please print clearly and provide complete & accurate information) Employee Name: Current Review Period: to Job Title: Department
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only)
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only) Employee Name: Name: Position Title: Position Title: EKU ID No.: Review Period: / / through / / Department: Review Date: / / *This form
Office of Human Resources. Financial Manager
Office of Human Resources Financial Manager Page 1 of 6 GENERAL STATEMENT OF CLASS DUTIES Manages financial functional and/or operational area(s) that include implementing work plans based on annual goals
2. Describe this employee s important accomplishments during the past year. Please provide examples.
Supervisor Input Form Date Performance Appraisal Employee Name: Period Reviewed: Section 1: Activities and Accomplishments 1. Please state the primary responsibilities of this employee s position, as you
IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide
IACBE Advancing Academic Quality in Business Education Worldwide Example of a Supervisor of Internship Rubric International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education 11374 Strang Line Road Lenexa, Kansas
Date Started Current Position. Instructions
Client Company Performance Appraisal Review for Non-Exempt Employees Employee Name Title of Review Department Started Current Position Current Supervisor Instructions Review employee s performance for
Duty Station: Appraisal Period: From: To: Employee: Rating Official: Reviewing Official (if applicable*): Employee: Date: Rating Official: Date:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Employee Performance Appraisal Plan Employee Name and Social Security Number: Title/Series/Grade: Duty Station: Appraisal Period: From: To: Part A-1: Notification of Standards:
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS AND FORM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS AND FORM The Employee Review process involves 5 steps: Step 1: No later than 7 days before the scheduled review, the Manager gives the Employee Action Plan Form
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2010 Page 1 of 12
1093.0 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 1093.0.1 Authorization: Act 688 of 2009 amends Arkansas Code Annotated 21-5-1101 to provide a performance-based merit increase pay system based on employee performance evaluation.
Facilities Maintenance Department Employee Evaluation Foreman/Lead
Facilities Maintenance Department Employee Evaluation Foreman/Lead Part I Administrative Data Name Employee ID Date of Hire Last Promotion Location Reason for Submission Period Covered Rated Months Facilities
Annual Performance Review
Annual Performance Review Name: Length of Time in Position: Review Period ( From/To): Title: Length of Time with JCU: Supervisor/Mgr: The purpose of this annual performance review is to engage in open,
Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon
Performance Management Handbook City of American Canyon 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Background on performance management City Core competencies Performance management model Development of the Core
DALLAS COUNTY NON-EXEMPT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
DALLAS COUNTY Purpose: The following evaluation form is designed to measure the performance of non-exempt employees during the period of review, and provide an opportunity for the employee and supervisor
EVALUATIONS - GENERAL - MEMBERS OF THE SERVICE
Section: Personnel Matters Procedure No: 205-48 EVALUATIONS - GENERAL - MEMBERS OF THE SERVICE DATE ISSUED: DATE EFFECTIVE: REVISION NUMBER: PAGE: 05/21/10 05/28/10 10-03 1 of 5 PURPOSE PROCEDURE COMMANDING
RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
60L-35.001 Scope and Purpose 60L-35.002 Definitions 60L-35.003 Minimum Requirements 60L-35.004 Career Service 60L-35.005 Selected Exempt Service 60L-35.006 Transitional Provision (Repealed) 60L-35.001
County of Orange Department of Fire & EMS Employee Performance Evaluation Company Officer. Hire Date: Period Covered:
County of Orange Department of Fire & EMS Employee Performance Evaluation Company Officer Name: Hire Date: Period Covered: Employee #: From: To: Evaluation and Criteria Using the following numerical scale,
NG Technician Performance Appraisal Program. Writing Effective Critical Elements Using the SMART or MARST Formats
NG Technician Performance Appraisal Program Writing Effective Critical Elements Using the SMART or MARST Formats Overview Performance Appraisal Program The Five Rating Level Evaluation Method Performance
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form EMPLOYEE: CLASSIFICATION: EMPL ID: DEPARTMENT: RATER: TYPE OF EVALUATION: PROBATIONARY ANNUAL OTHER EVALUATION DATE: The Employee
GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC. Job Description. JOB TITLE: Compliance Director
GLOBAL FINANCIAL PRIVATE CAPITAL, LLC Job Description JOB TITLE: Compliance Director SUMMARY: This position is primarily responsible for serving as the manager and supervisor within the Compliance Department
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor review key responsibilities (from the job
Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation and Improvement Report has developed this performance evaluation process as a way to encourage workers and their supervisors to talk about issues in the workplace.
Performance Review Process Guidelines Nova Southeastern University
Performance Review Process Guidelines Nova Southeastern University for classified and administrative/professional employees Statement of Purpose and Philosophy The annual performance review is a key element
MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff
MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff EMPLOYEE NAME: JOB TITLE: DEPARTMENT: PERIOD OF EVALUATION: FROM: TO: TIME IN CURRENT POSITION: TIME WITH THE COLLEGE:
TTUHSC Staff Performance Management SUPERVISOR'S GUIDE TO STAFF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
SUPERVISOR'S GUIDE TO STAFF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT Page 1 of 13 Table of Contents PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT... 3 PURPOSE OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT... 3 HOW TO USE THE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROCESS... 4 Phase
Senior Executive Service Performance Management System. [Agency Name]
1. System Coverage Senior Executive Service Performance Management System [Agency Name] The [Agency Name] (hereafter referred to as the agency) Senior Executive Service (SES) performance management system
EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
Catholic Diocese of Raleigh Annual Performance Review EMPLOYEE INFORMATION EMPLOYEE NAME JOB TITLE SUPERVISOR/MANAGER PERIOD COVERED BY THIS APPRAISAL TYPE OF REVIEW Annual SIGNATURE OF REVIEWING MANAGER
Performance Evaluation System (PES) Instruction Guide
Performance Evaluation System (PES) Instruction Guide The State of New Jersey Performance Evaluation System (PES) Program Completion Instructions INTRODUCTION Performance assessment is an important part
Performance Evaluation Senior Leadership
Performance Evaluation Senior Leadership Employee Name: Position: Program/Dept.: Supervisor Name: Review Date: For each of the valuation standards, bullet points have been provided to assist you with the
Service Desk Analyst
Principles Vision Purpose Statement Service Desk Analyst healthalliance Purpose, Vision and Principles healthalliance provides shared services to benefit NZ health organisations. We will deliver increasing
Performance Evaluation. August 20, 2013
Performance Evaluation Discussion Points for University Support Staff August 20, 2013 Performance Evaluations method to assess job performance. A PSU system would include the following: 1. University Support
2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples
2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples Human Resources Peer Networking Benchmarks 13 Examples of Performance Appraisals submitted by MAPP members Including Core Competencies and Helpful Phrases 2015
Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport Authority. Performance Evaluation System Guide
Table of Contents Performance Evaluation System - Overview... 5 Performance Evaluation System... 5 Performance Evaluation Frequency... 5 Performance Evaluation System - Roles... 7 Tips for Supervisors
Staff Performance Evaluation Training. Office of Human Resources October 2014
Staff Performance Evaluation Training Office of Human Resources October 2014 Documents Suggestion: Have copies of the following documents available during this presentation Core Competencies Staff Self-Evaluation
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES Human Resource Management Division PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Pursuant to the provisions of Rule IX of the Omnibus Rules Implementing Book V of Executive Order
IC Performance Standards
IC Performance Standards Final Version 1 23 April 2009 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND... 3 OCCUPATIONAL STRUCTURE... 4 PERFORMANCE ELEMENT CONTENT MODELS... 7 Professional and Technician/Administrative
HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:
HUMAN RESOURCES Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10 Policy Statement 3: Performance Management Performance Management Program 1. Purpose To establish a Policy for implementing and managing
Performance Appraisal Form
Performance Appraisal Form PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM EMPLOYEE EVALUATION NAME DATE JOB EVALUATION TITLE PERIOD EVALUATOR: _ 1. Productivity The amount of work an individual does in a work day. What is
