Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal
|
|
|
- Eustacia Rodgers
- 10 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal Performance Appraisal Full Performance Appraisal and Development Plan Probationary Appraisal 3 Month 6 Month Employee s name (Last, First, MI) Bus # Years of Driving Experience in MCS Last Evaluation Date Date Evaluator s Name Evaluator s Title Instructions The purpose of the Performance Appraisal and Development Plan is to provide a systematic way of setting objectives, assessing a bus driver s performance, and identifying areas for improvement and development. All bus drivers will receive a formal Performance Appraisal at least once every twenty-four (24) months. There are two types of performance appraisals. 1. Probationary Performance Appraisal Two Probationary Performance Appraisals are conducted during the performance period for a new hire: w the first one after completion of three (3) months. w the second one after completion of five (5) months (prior to the end of the sixth (6) month.). - at this time permanent status will be granted or denied. 2. Annual Performance Appraisal An annual evaluation is conducted: w for all bus drivers (at least) every twenty-four months from the date of hire. w if it has been more than six (6) months since the bus driver s last evaluation and one or more of the following has occurred: - a change in performance level - a change in job responsibility or level - an unsatisfactory evaluation in the previous period w for new hires after the two probationary evaluations and thereafter every twenty four (24) months from the date of hire. The supervisor will place a check mark in the appropriate box on the upper right hand corner of this form to indicate the type of Performance Appraisal being conducted for the bus driver. COMPLETING THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM w Part 1 - Professional Skills How well the bus driver performed his/her job. In this section the supervisor should evaluate how the bus driver demonstrated his/her commitment to the district standards. w Part 2 - Personal Attributes How an employee accomplishes results is just as important as what is accomplished. In this section, the supervisor should evaluate how the bus driver demonstrated his/her personal attributes. w Part 3 Summary, Commendations, and Recommendations Rating Summary The overall performance rating should be determined based upon how well the bus driver met the established performance objectives. Commendation This section provides the evaluator with an opportunity to identify areas of commendation. Recommendation This section provides the evaluator with an opportunity to identify skills in need of development for the bus driver s performance in his/her position and to establish action plans and timelines that will address these developmental needs. If necessary, additional pages may be attached. The bus driver is required to sign and date the form. The employee s signature indicates that the Performance Appraisal has been read and understood and does not necessarily indicate agreement with the Performance Appraisal content or rating. The completed original appraisal forms are to be forwarded to the superintendent s office for placement in the employee s file. Return this form along with the completed evaluation 4/29/15
2 MANCHESTER COMMUNITY SCHOOLS EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL for School Bus Driver EVALUATION OF Employee s name Date POSITION: Bus Driver Ratings of 1 or 3 in any category must be supported in the comments section; however comments are encouraged in all areas, or in the form of an attachment. The evaluator shall complete this form by indicating the appropriate rating and meeting with the employee to discuss its contents. This form shall be signed and dated by both the employee and the evaluator. Part 1 - Professional Skills I. HEALTH AND SAFETY PRACTICES 1. Effectively complies with all safety practices, 2. Does not follow safety practices. and refrains from taking unnecessary risks. II. KNOWLEDGE OF WORK 1. Exceptional ability to grasp and carry 2. Effectively grasps & carries out job 3. Does not carry out out job duties and responsibilities. duties & responsibilities. duties and responsibilities. Follows instructions in a complete and thorough manner. III. JUDGMENT, DECISION MAKING AND DEPENDABILITY 1. Exceptional judgment & ability to make 2. Effective judgment, dependability & 3. Weakness in judgment, good decisions regarding responsibilities. decision making in meeting the needs dependability or ability to Always dependable. of job requirements. make decisions in meeting the needs of job requirements. 2
3 IV. QUALITY AND ACCURACY OF WORK 1. Exceptional ability to follow safe and 2. Effectively demonstrates ability 3. Needs to improve driving defensive driving techniques. to follow safe and defensive driving techniques. techniques. V. COMMUNICATION 1. Exceptional in written and verbal com- 2. Meets expectations in communications 3. Needs to improve communimunication specific to related driving and follows directions as assigned. cation and collaboration duties. VI. OPERATION AND CARE OF EQUIPMENT/WORK AREA 1. Exceptional in the use and care of 2. Meets expectations in the use, know- 3. Needs to improve in the use equipment. Bus is kept ledge and care of equipment. Bus care and knowledge of exceptionally clean. is normally clean. equipment. Bus is not clean. Part 2 - Personal Attributes I. POSITIVE INTERACTION WITH PEERS, PUBLIC AND PUPILS 1. Exceptional interpersonal skills. Promotes 2. Consistently cooperative in commu- 3. Needs to improve attitude and respect & collaboration among staff, nicating with staff, peers and public. communication skills to peers and public. enhance personal interaction. II. ATTENDANCE/PUNCTUALITY 1. Acceptable. 2. Excessive - Needs to improve. 3
4 III. WORK ATTITUDE 1. Self-motivated. Enthusiastic. Accepts 2. Generally accepts change and takes 3. Lacks initiative, refuses to change and/or new ideas in working on new responsibilities as assigned. accept change or new with staff on new or existing ideas. responsibilities.. IV. EFFECTIVE USE OF TIME/MEETS DEADLINES 1. Shows ability to follow assigned bus 2. Needs to improve in following assigned schedule and contacts parents when bus schedule or in contacting parents when necessary. necessary. V. INITIATIVE 1. Shows exceptional initiative and 2. Effectively shows considerable interest 3. Frequently appears indifferent. enthusiasm in engaging in new procedures in engaging in new procedures and/or Shows little initiative in and/or techniques. Self motivated. techniques. learning new ideas or procedures. VI. SKILL ENHANCEMENT (OPTIONAL) Participates in workshops, committees, safety meetings, or self enhancement to improve skills. 4
5 OVERALL EMPLOYEE RATING SUMMARY Exceptional employee; performance outstanding. Performance meets standards. Performance unsatisfactory. EMPLOYMENT RECOMMENDATION: FOR PERMANENT EMPLOYEE ONLY Continue in current position May continue on condition Do not recommend continuance as (See specific goals below.) a bus driver. FOR PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEE ONLY Recommend permanent status Continue on probationary Do not recommend permanent status (3 month evaluation) COMMENDATION: RECOMMENDATION/GOALS: (Record goals or improvement program to be undertaken during next evaluation period) / / Signature of Evaluator Date Signature of Employee Date It is understood that in signing this form the employee acknowledges having seen and discussed the report. The employee s signature does not necessarily imply agreement with the conclusion of the evaluator. (Employee comments must be submitted to the Director of Transportation within ten (10) days of receipt of this Performance Appraisal. 5
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT
BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2010 Review Date 2015 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous policies Page 1 of 12 Identification HR-4540 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS
POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS Number 100.16 EXEMPT STAFF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL POLICY POLICY: All exempt District staff shall have their performance reviewed 1) twice during any probationary period
Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)
Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees) Name: Department: Campus ID Number: Title: Review Period: - Job Description Review: I. Essential Job Requirements: (Consider employee s knowledge of duties, responsibilities
Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees
Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees Employee Name: Review Position: Supervisor: Type Performance Review: Annual Review Other Review Period From: To: INTRODUCTION The performance
PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE
LANGSTON U NIVERSITY Performance Management System Clerical, Craft, Maintenance, Technical, and Service Employees Use for Employees Who Do Not Supervise Others PART I Langston University s performance
The University of Southern Mississippi Performance Appraisal Instructions
Performance Appraisal Instructions Instructions: A current job description is needed to complete this performance appraisal. Essential tasks are numbered on the job description, and these task numbers
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT. Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Guide to Evaluating Classified Employees San Juan Unified School District 3738 Walnut Ave. Carmichael, CA
Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program
Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program June 2011 Performance Evaluation Guide for Classifed Staff Employees TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble...
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES NAME: POSITION TITLE: DEPARTMENT/OFFICE: EVALUATED BY BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER: BANNER POSITION NUMBER: REVIEW DATE: Supervisor ID: INSTRUCTIONS:
Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees
Client Company Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees Employee Name Department Title Date Started Current Position Date of Review Current Supervisor Instructions Review employee s performance
Date Started Current Position. Instructions
Client Company Performance Appraisal Review for Non-Exempt Employees Employee Name Title of Review Department Started Current Position Current Supervisor Instructions Review employee s performance for
Annual Performance Evaluation Form
Annual Performance Evaluation Form Instructions & Guidelines Performance Evaluation Form Instructions: The purpose of this performance evaluation form is to establish goals and expectations for the current
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff and Service Personnel Employee s Name (Last, First, MI): Position Title: Department: Period Covered: From: To: Type of Report: Probationary
Supervision and Appraisal for School-based Teaching Staff Policy
1. Background 2. Guiding Principles 3. Definitions 4. Teacher Appraisal 5. Roles and Responsibilities 6. Documentation Appendix A Nova Scotia Education Act, Section 26 Duties 1. Background Through section
DRAFT POLICY ON CONFIRMATION, EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF PROBATIONARY APPOINTMENT OF CS EDUCATORS-KZN: DEC
DRAFT POLICY ON CONFIRMATION, EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF PROBATIONARY APPOINTMENT OF CS EDUCATORS-KZN: DEC 1. PURPOSE This policy seeks to provide measures for the confirmation, extension or termination
Performance Appraisal
PURPOSE Performance Appraisal 90-day Evaluation 180-day Evaluation Annual Evaluation The purpose of any performance appraisal program is employee development. The value of performance appraisal is in the
UCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
UCC CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Evaluation Period:* to Evaluation Meeting Date: SECTION 1 Employee: Job Title: Employee ID: Department: Immediate Supervisor/Administrator: Title: TYPE OF
Chabot-Las Positas College Community District
Chabot-Las Positas College Community District CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Employee Name (First, Middle, Last): Employee Position Title: Please Check Type of Report Probation: 3-mo, 5-mo;
Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review
Name: Review Period: Job Title: Reviewer: Note: Place a mark in the appropriate space which describes the performance of the person named, as determined by this appraisal. Use the following codes and definitions.
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees
DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees PART I PURPOSE DePauw University s performance appraisal process is based upon the belief that employees are our most critical resource,
ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES
ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES DATE: Name: Position: Department: Annual Performance Review COPY MUST BE RETURNED TO HR FOR FILE Part 1: of General Performance
Association of Municipal Administrators The Voice of Municipal Administrators
Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Municipal Administrators The Voice of Municipal Administrators EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS INTRODUCTION This performance appraisal form captures the basic
Employee Self-Evaluation Form
Employee Self-Evaluation Form Employee Name: Job Title: Department: Performance Review Period: From: JANUARY 1, 2013 To: DECEMBER 31, 2013 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Complete each performance area described
Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors. For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff
Performance Appraisal Handbook For Supervisors For the evaluation of Non-Instructional Academic Staff (NIAS) and University Staff Department of Human Resources May 2013 Introduction Performance management
STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE
PAGE: 1 of 17 TITLE: EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (EPMS) (REVIEW DATE OPTION) POLICY REFERENCE NUMBER: 8-4-100 DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY: Human Resource Services DATE OF LAST REVISION: May 13,
University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade:
University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form Employee Name: Employee Number: Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade: Department Name: Today s : Supervisor
SECTION I GENERAL JOB RESPONSIBILITIES
NIPISSING UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE EVALUATION The purpose of this employee evaluation is to assess performance/skill levels, improve communication and pin-point strengths and weaknesses identified
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name: Job Title: Date: Department: Type of Appraisal: Annual Probationary Self Evaluation Appraisal Period: From: To: Instructions: Please carefully review the employee
Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report
Classified Employee Performance Evaluation and Improvement Report has developed this performance evaluation process as a way to encourage workers and their supervisors to talk about issues in the workplace.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Name Social Security No. Agency Department Position Classification Date Assigned to Current Position Performance Review From To PLANNING STAGE
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL STUDENT SERVICES PERSONNEL (PSSP)
BOARD PROCEDURE Approval Date 2015 Review Date 2020 Contact Person/Department Human Resources Administrator Replacing All previous procedures Page 1 of 20 Identification HR 4525 PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROFESSIONAL
Performance Evaluation System Protocol. Licensed Executive Professionals
Colorado Springs School District 11 Dr. Nicholas Gledich, Superintendent Performance Evaluation System Protocol Licensed Executive Professionals Revised March 2014 235169.6 Department of Human Resources
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013
CITY OF GUNNISON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM 2013 Name: Position: Anniversary Date in Position: Department: Supervisor: Appraisal Period: from to PURPOSE Communication about performance between
College of Design. Merit Pay Rating System. Merit Rating System
College of Design Merit Pay Rating System Merit Rating System The College of Design will use the Performance Only model of merit pay. Merit rating system and definition a. Merit pay matrix if defined at
Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale
Employee Name Employee ID Number Job Title Department Reviewing Supervisor Review Period Period Supervised by Reviewing Supervisor Period Employee in this Job Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating
Salaried Performance Appraisal 1870 South Boulder Avenue Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.5423 www.mhat.org
Salaried Performance Appraisal 1870 South Boulder Avenue Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.5423 www.mhat.org Employee Name Job Title Hire Date Evaluation Date Department Supervisor Annual Review 90 day Review Review
HUMAN RESOURCES. Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10. To ensure a means by which employees and their supervisors can:
HUMAN RESOURCES Revised: 04/30/03 Reviewed and Updated 11/11/10 Policy Statement 3: Performance Management Performance Management Program 1. Purpose To establish a Policy for implementing and managing
Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board
Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board POLICY: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR NON-TEACHING STAFF Adopted: 10/02/04 Policy No: 300.06 Former Policy #: Revised: 22/06/10 Policy Category: Human
NEEDHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS Needham, Massachusetts 02492-2692 EVALUATION PROCESS: NURSES
NEEDHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS Needham, Massachusetts 02492-2692 EVALUATION PROCESS: NURSES INTRODUCTION The evaluation process focuses on ten standards that are consistent with the the guidelines set forth by
Employee Performance Review
Employee Performance Review Employee Name: Employee Job Title: Department: Location of Hire: Last Reviewed: Supervisor s Signature Printed Name in Position: Employee Signature Review Period: to Printed
RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHAPTER 60L-35 PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
60L-35.001 Scope and Purpose 60L-35.002 Definitions 60L-35.003 Minimum Requirements 60L-35.004 Career Service 60L-35.005 Selected Exempt Service 60L-35.006 Transitional Provision (Repealed) 60L-35.001
POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION
CHESWOLD POLICE Department of Public Safety POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION Effective Date: Directive Number: April 15, 2013 10-1-7 Special Instructions: NONE Distribution: All Sworn & Last Re-Evaluation
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Blinn College is the premier two-year college in Texas for those seeking educational excellence in academic programs, technical education, and workforce development. We expect excellence and we encourage
EMPLOYEE INFORMATION
EMPLOYEE INFORMATION Date Last Name MI First Name Position/Title Current Pay Grade Department/Division or Section Original Hire Date Performance Review Period Date Appointed to Current Position From: Supervisor
Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide
Employee Performance Review Reference Guide Oklahoma Baptist University Office of Human Resources March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Why Review?... 1 The Ratings... 1 Managerial Elements... 1 Leadership...
BYLAWS FOR THE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MANAGEMENT APPENDIX B
BYLAWS FOR THE ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MANAGEMENT APPENDIX B INSTRUMENTS FOR FACULTY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Procedures are detailed
CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM
CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Name Date Department Evaluation Period Job Title Evaluator Annual Probationary Special (Explain) Performance I. SELF-ASSESSMENT In what areas do I excel
Ratings Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Improvement Needed
The staff appraisal process is an on-going communications process that begins with the identification of performance goals by the supervisor in the fall. During the spring semester, a formal appraisal
San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Administrator Performance Appraisal Forms
San Jose/Evergreen Community College District Administrator Performance Appraisal Forms Philosophy and Policy In accordance with Education Code Section 87663, the policy on evaluation of administrators
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION NAME POSITION/TITLE HIRE DATE LOCATION/DEPARTMENT EMPLOYMENT STATUS FT PT PD LAST REVIEW DATE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR DATE: TYPE OF REVIEW: ANNUAL PROBATIONARY OTHER Instructions
Division of Human Resources Staff Performance Management Procedure
Performance standards and expectations, based on an up-to-date position description, should be clearly communicated to employees at the time of appointment to their position and as they change thereafter.
FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
APPENDIX C FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM Philosophy and Policy The performance of all Foothill-De Anza Community College District administrators
County of Orange Department of Fire & EMS Employee Performance Evaluation Company Officer. Hire Date: Period Covered:
County of Orange Department of Fire & EMS Employee Performance Evaluation Company Officer Name: Hire Date: Period Covered: Employee #: From: To: Evaluation and Criteria Using the following numerical scale,
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT A CONTRACT BETWEEN EMPLOYEES AND WINTHROP UNIVERSITY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. THIS DOCUMENT DOES
The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM
The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM GENERAL INFORMATION In accordance with Public Service System Rules and Regulations Part 9.1 The performance evaluation system is designed
Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy
Alexander County Performance Evaluation Policy Adopted: April 2, 2002 Revised August 4, 2003 I. INTRODUCTION The County of Alexander has recognized the relationship of position classification, job performance,
Employee s Name: Susan Jones. Title: Administrative Officer. Supervisor: Marcia Meadows. Date: April 2, 200x
Employee s Name: Susan Jones Title: Administrative Officer Descriptive Performance Review Form Job Definition Supervisor: Marcia Meadows Date: April 2, 200x 1. Attach a current position description; if
Employee Performance Appraisal Form
Employee Performance Appraisal Form Employee Name: Job Title: Department: Performance Review Period: From: JANUARY 1, 2013 To: DECEMBER 31, 2013 Written By: Title: Department: PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Complete
Classified Employee Performance Assessment
Classified Employee Performance Assessment Evaluation for: Employee name Job classification title Internal position title Department School, College, Division Employment date for current position Most
Faculty Performance Appraisal System Akamai University
Faculty Performance Appraisal System Akamai University A. University Position Statement Akamai faculty supervisors and the administration conduct periodic performance appraisals of all members of the faculty
Staff Development and Performance Management Policy & Procedure
Staff Development and Performance Management Policy & Procedure Overview The purpose of this document is to outline QAHC s approach to staff development and performance management. The policy and procedure
*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*
*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft* Employee information Employee name Position title/department Date of Hire Employee ID number Supervisor s name Today
GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form
GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form (For RANK and FILE) (Rating Period) (Name) (Position) PART 1 QUANTITATIVE GOALS (60%) INSTRUCTIONS This part is for setting and evaluating the performance of your
DALLAS COUNTY NON-EXEMPT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
DALLAS COUNTY Purpose: The following evaluation form is designed to measure the performance of non-exempt employees during the period of review, and provide an opportunity for the employee and supervisor
Job Description of the School Psychologist Reports To: Supervises: Purpose:
Reports To: Supervises: Purpose: Job Description of the School Psychologist Superintendent, Level II or Level III School Psychologists, Director, or Associate or Assistant Superintendent May supervise
Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers
Performance Appraisal System Evaluation Form Managers Name: Position Title: Department: Plan Date: Annual Review Date: PURPOSE OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Enable joint planning and communication between a
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS)
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (PACS) 1. DATE ISSUED CHAPTER S430_1 2. EMPLOYEES COVERED 3. LAW AND REGULATION 4. SSA DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY 5. SSA POLICY 5.1. Introduction 5.2. Overview
Utica College Performance Review Form
Utica College Performance Review Form EMPLOYEE NAME: DEPARTMENT: HIRE DATE: / / SUPERVISOR*: JOB TITLE: REVIEW PERIOD: From To *Supervisor is the person delivering the review INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING
Counselor Performance Evaluation System Counselor Self Appraisal
Counselor Performance Evaluation System Counselor Self Appraisal Pages 1-8 are for each counselor to access by September 1. Pages 2-3 are instructional pages. Page 4 is to be signed by the appraiser and
Performance Management
Performance Management PURPOSE... 1 POLICY STATEMENT... 2 WHO SHOULD KNOW THIS POLICY... 2 DEFINITIONS... 2 REGULATIONS... 3 1.0 TIMING AND FREQUENCY OF APPRAISALS... 3 2.0 PERFORMANCE PLANNING... 3 2.1
Number of employees who report to level of evaluated:
APPRAISAL Name Position / Working Title Administrative Unit / College Period of Evaluation Management (I to IV) Number of employees who report to level of evaluated: Date of Last Evaluation CSU Trustee
PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL
Employee Name: Position Title: Department: Supervisor Name: Date of Review: For Period: To At the beginning of each performance cycle, employee and supervisor review key responsibilities (from the job
CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES
INTRODUCTION CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES The City of Corpus Christi's Performance Management Process is designed to: 1. Communicate performance expectations
COUNSELOR JOB DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION FORM
COUNSELOR JOB DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION FORM The counselor evaluation form may be used by the counselor as a self-audit. It may also be used by supervisors to annually evaluate the counselor's performance.
CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS
SHASTA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS Implemented: 2003/04 School Year SHASTA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS
NOT APPLICABLE (N/A): Reviewer has no direct knowledge of employee's behavior in this area. Job Knowledge Score: / 5.0
Manager Performance Appraisal Appraisal Score Overall Score: / 5.0 Employee Information Name: Manager Name: Job Title: Department: Hire Date: Rating Scale Definition (5) EXCEPTIONAL: Consistently exceeds
Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation. Employee Last First Middle. Probationary progress Conclusion of probation
Town of Sunapee Supervisory Performance Evaluation Date of Evaluation Evaluation Period: From to Employee Department Last First Middle Job Title Anniversary (hire) date Date of appt. to current position
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Review 1/20/2012 EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Employee Seniority Supervisor(s) Position Title Department Job Skills & Knowledge: Demonstrates professional skills and knowledge of the responsibilities
PERFORMANCE REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDE Administrative Staff & Managers and Technicians & Academic Counsellors
PERFORMANCE REVIEW & DEVELOPMENT PLAN GUIDE Administrative Staff & Managers and Technicians & Academic Counsellors A. Purpose and Outcomes B. Frequency and Timing C. Process: 1. Setting Performance Objectives
Performance Appraisal Form
Performance Appraisal Form PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM EMPLOYEE EVALUATION NAME DATE JOB EVALUATION TITLE PERIOD EVALUATOR: _ 1. Productivity The amount of work an individual does in a work day. What is
MESA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CLASSIFIED EVALUATION SYSTEM 2015-16
MESA PUBLIC SCHOOLS CLASSIFIED EVALUATION SYSTEM 2015-16 Table of Contents Classified Evaluation Committee 3 Evaluation Introduction 4 District Vision, Mission, Core Values, Priorities and Goals 5 Governing
PERSONNEL SERVICES Regulation 4610
PERSONNEL SERVICES Regulation 4610 Performance Evaluation Instructional Staff Performance Evaluation Philosophy of Evaluation A performance-based evaluation system is critical to improving teaching, thus
Civil Service Performance Management System
Civil Service Performance Management System A handbook for Supervisors on how to conduct performance planning, mid-term progress review and annual appraisal meetings. Table of Contents 1 Abbreviations...
University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form
PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form Employee Name: UID: Job Title: Division/Department: Supervisor: Rating Cycle: Date of Final Review: Section/Unit:
Radford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM
Radford University TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GOVERNING ADMISSION/READMISSION, FIELD PLACEMENT, RETENTION, and PROGRAM COMPLETION Students have a professional obligation to abide
INTRODUCTION PART ONE: REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS
INTRODUCTION This recommended performance appraisal form incorporates extensive feedback from University of California supervisors and managers. It captures the basic principles of effectively evaluating
Teacher Evaluation Plan and Handbook Of Procedures. Mr. Arne Duncan Chief Executive Officer Chicago Public Schools
Teacher Evaluation Plan and Handbook Of Procedures Mr. Arne Duncan Chief Executive Officer Chicago Public Schools CONTENTS Introduction 3 Educational Roles 3 Teacher Long-Range Plans 4 Classroom Teachers
