OTIPM: A model for implementing top-down, client-centered, and occupation-based assessment, intervention, and documentation



Similar documents
1. INTRODUCTION The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS)

Semester and year: Spring 2010 Level: Re entry, post baccalaureate Credits: 2 Graded: Pass/No Pass (repeatable one time for credit) Location: On line

The necessity of using theoretical conceptual practice models of occupational therapy in Greece: a case study of a citizen with dementia

STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY

DEPARTMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY MOCT 633 (6 credit hours) Domains and Process II (Early Adults through Elderly)

COTA Curriculum Textbook and Peer-Reviewed Journal Report

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY PROGRAM

CURRICULUM VITAE ANNE G. FISHER

GUIDELINES FOR DOCUMENTATION OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY

Occupational Therapy Assisting STARK STATE COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY

Guidelines for Documentation of Occupational Therapy

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSISTANT CURRICULUM DESIGN

SCOPE OF PRACTICE. Statement of Purpose The purpose of this document is to define the scope of practice in occupational therapy in order to

From the 2011 Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education (ACOTE ) Standards and Interpretive Guide:

Each faculty/ias member has a personal philosophy of teaching/learning. Collectively, as a faculty, we endorse the following ideas:

The Association of Occupational Therapists of Ireland. Occupational Therapy Standards of Practice Statements 2008

Second Year Fall. Spring

Cooking After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cookbook for Seattle Brainworks. May, 2012

How To Get A Board Certification In Physical Rehabilitation

How To Become An Occupational Therapy Assistant

Occupational Therapy and Upper Limb Amputee Rehabilitation: Occupational Focused Intervention. Matthew Sproats (BaAppSc OT)

EHOVE/LCCC Occupational Therapy Assistant Program Level II Fieldwork OCTA 205

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY PRACTICE FRAMEWORK DOMAIN AND PROCESS

Where can an occupation-focussed philosophy take occupational therapy?

The Role of Occupational Therapy in Psychosocial Interventions

School-based Support Personnel

Standard of Care: Inpatient Intervention for Total Hip Arthroplasty ICD-9 (719.7, 719.1)

Occupational therapy in Sweden and our member association

Facilitating Success in College for Undergraduate Students with ASD, LD, and Mental Health Diagnoses

Restorative Care. Policy, Procedures and Training Package

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY GRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK

Elnora Ellie M. Gilfoyle

PART I DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL SERVICES STATE OF HAWAII Class Specifications for the

P/OTD 541 Critical Analysis of Occupational Therapy Practice OTD 601 Capstone CRITICALLY APPRAISED TOPIC (CAT) WORKSHEET

The Executive Function Task Application Model (EFTAM): development and application

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

KHADER (AHMAD TAWFIQ) K. ALMHDAWI Occupational Therapist, M.Sc. Rehabilitation Science, PhD

Guidelines for Supervision, Roles, and Responsibilities During the Delivery of Occupational Therapy Services

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING (ADL) DECLINE Clinical Guidelines

2. RELATED SERVICES AND SUPPORTS RECEIVED BY YOUTH WITH DISABILITIES

GUIDELINES FOR RE-ENTRY INTO THE FIELD OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY

Assessment. Figure Nursing Process and Critical Thinking

Exercise is Medicine Australia Education evaluation summary

NEW YORK STATE MEDICAID PROGRAM REHABILITATION SERVICES POLICY GUIDELINES

Occupational Engagement (2015/16)

Long Term Goals (LTGs) state the final product to be achieved by physical therapy intervention. Expected functional outcomes are a type of LTG

CENTRE FOR MUSCULOSKELETAL AND NEUROLOGICAL REHABILITATION GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

GUIDELINES AND SERVICES FOR OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY AND PHYSICAL THERAPY

Lincoln Park Public Schools Occupational Therapist Evaluation

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT PHYSICAL THERAPY, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, AND ADAPTED PHYSICAL EDUCATION SERVICES

Mary E. Evenson, OTD, MPH, OTR/L, FAOTA, FNAP

Public Act No

Telemedicine services. Crisis intervcntion response services, except

Applying Sensory Integration in School-based Occupational Therapy: Enabling Participation in School Occupations. Sue Delport & Andrea Hasselbusch

Standards of Practice for Occupational Therapy

A model of rehabilitation service delivery for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in New Zealand: its development and implementation

A New Vision of Rehabilitation Recovering cognitive abilities with Dynavision

Related Services: How Do Special Needs Education Relate to Your Child?

Table Required Assessments and Qualified Examiners by Type of Disability Disability Assessments Required Qualified Examiners

Implementing effective occupational therapy in dementia; the needs and strategies for occupational therapists.

New Directions in Occupational Therapy: Adolescent Mental Health

Chapter 1. A Normative Model of Physical Therapist Professional Education: Version 2004

CURRICULUM VITAE OF Alma R. Abdel-Moty Occupational Therapy Department

N656: ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING: PRIMARY CARE II

Section 2. Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Services

Ageism within Occupational Therapy? Opinion Piece. Key Areas: Clinical Elderly. Professional Development

ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES: AN OVERVIEW

Updated Activity Analysis Using the Occupational Therapy Practice Framework III: Paralleling Craft Activity Skills to Everyday Occupations

Curriculum Vitae Patricia Stutz-Tanenbaum

Occupational Therapy Protocol Checklist

Occupational Engagement (2015/16)

Curriculum Vitae Patricia Stutz-Tanenbaum

COE Guidelines for an Occupational Therapy Fieldwork Experience - Level II

School Systems SIS Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

AOTA FIELDWORK DATA FORM

Dedicated Stroke Interprofessional Rehab Team. Mixed Rehab Unit. Dedicated Rehab Unit

RE: CMS-3819-P; Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Conditions of Participation for Home Health Agencies

REHABILITATION OF EXECUTIVE DISORDERS

The Use of Expressive Arts in various Occupational Therapy Settings

COURSE NUMBER: HNI 373 CREDITS: (SIX) 6

Nursing 11 Booklist-Fall 2014

OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ASSISTANT STUDENT HANDBOOK

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School-Based Occupational Therapists

Transcription:

OTIPM: A model for implementing top-down, client-centered, and occupation-based assessment, intervention, and documentation Developed by Professor Anne G. Fisher, ScD, OT, FAOTA The OTIPM rescued me from an OT-depression! Half of my clients did not need OT, they needed physiotherapy. After I learned the OTIPM, I made sure the OT referrals were appropriate and took more time for the interviewing observing goal-setting process, and I focused more on education and compensation. Nothing totally new, but still it changed something. I gained more OT self-esteem and joy in my work. We changed our documentation system. And we threw out the old tests, and now we focus on performance of prioritized activities. Even one of the most body-function-working OT colleagues are enthusiastically reporting that they are reaching goals more easily and faster! Overview Katharina, 2015 This 3-day course is ideal for occupational therapy practitioners, educators, and researchers who want to implement best possible occupation-based and occupation-focused services. The course content progresses step-by-step through the phases of the occupational therapy process. Lectures, video case examples, and extensive opportunities to practice enable the course participants to reflect on and learn strategies they can apply to improve their practice, educational activities, and research. While this course is based on the Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM, Fisher, 2009; Fisher & Jones, in press). the emphasis is on the practical application of the OTIPM as a professional reasoning model that helps the occupational therapist practice in a more client-centered, top-down, occupation-based, and occupation-focused manner. The occupational therapists who take this course find that they leave inspired to make their practice more centered on occupation. A major premise of the OTIPM is that focusing our evaluations on the client s quality of occupational performance, focusing our interventions directly on enhancing or maintaining occupational performance, and using occupation as a primary method for both evaluation and intervention all depend on a concurrent commitment to true top down and client-centered practice. When we embrace these fundamental principles of occupation-based and occupation-focused services, occupational therapists will: Document measureable and occupation-focused baselines, goals, and outcomes Use occupation-based and occupation-focused evaluation and intervention methods to enhance the quality and effectiveness of the services they provide

Advocate for and promote the distinct value of occupational therapy to consumers, third-party payers, and other professionals Value the contributions of occupational therapy to health care and health promotion Background Based on her 1998 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lectureship, Professor Fisher brings together 50 years of experience to present a model for professional reasoning. The OTIPM is a professional reasoning model that occupational therapists can use to ensure that they adopt an occupation-centered (OC) perspective to guide their reasoning as they plan and implement occupation-based (OB) and occupation-focused (OF) services (Fisher, 2013). In the OTIPM, the occupational therapy process is depicted as occurring over three global phases, evaluation and goal-setting, intervention, and reevaluation, and each step in the process may be OB, OF, or both (Fisher, 2013). The steps of the occupational therapy process defined in the OTIPM are represented schematically below (see Figure 1).

Who Should Attend? Occupational therapists who want to change their practice and implement services that are occupation-based and occupation-focused. Occupational therapists who already practice in a manner with which they are satisfied attending this course will enable them to reflect on and evaluate their current practice and identify components that they can further improve so as to become even more occupation-centered. Occupational therapist who want to change practice and are struggling with where to start in order to overcome the many obstacles that limit what they can do. Course Description While the OTIPM is a professional reasoning model, the emphasis of this course is on the practical application of the OTIPM in practice. A variety of individual and group activities provide the course participants with opportunities to implement (a) nonstandardized occupation-focused and occupationbased evaluations of quality of a person s occupational performance, including the performance of daily life tasks that involve social interaction, and (b) occupation-focused documentation. Video case examples are used to reinforce learning. Course Objectives At the conclusion of a 3-day OTIPM workshop, the participants will understand: The occupation-centered professional reasoning process defined in the OTIPM Distinctions between occupation-centered reasoning and occupation-based and occupation-focused practice The various types of evaluations and interventions occupational therapists commonly use and which ones are occupation-based or occupation-focused How to apply true top down and occupation-centered reasoning in the context of implementing occupation-based and occupation-focused services How to implement nonstandardized observation-based performance analyses of a person s quality of occupational performance How to write occupation-focused documentation, including observable and measureable clientcentered goals When and how to link other occupational therapy models of practice and evaluation methods into the occupational therapy intervention process

Course Schedule Day 1 8:30 to 10:00 Introduction to the course Developing a common language 10:00 to 10:30 Break 10:30 to 12:00 Introduction to the OTIPM Case application Client-centered performance context 12:00 to 1:15 Lunch 1:15 to 3:00 Case application Client-centered performance context (continued) 3:00 to 3:30 Break 3:30 to 4:30 Document background information, reason for referral, and self-reported level of occupational performance Day 2 8:30 to 10:00 Case application Implement performance analysis (motor and process skills) 10:00 to 10:30 Break 10:30 to 12:00 Case application Document baseline level of performance and clientcentered goals 12:00 to 1:15 Lunch 1:15 to 3:00 Case application Document client-centered goals (continued) 3:00 to 3:30 Break 3:30 to 4:30 Case application Plan intervention Document intervention plan Reevaluate and document result Day 3 8:30 to 9:15 Introduction to a general OT program based on OTIPM 9:15 to 10:00 Case application Implement performance analysis (social interaction skills) 10:00 to 10:30 Break 10:30 to 12:00 Case application Document baseline level of performance and clientcentered, occupation-focused goals 12:00 to 1:15 Lunch 1:15 to 1:45 Case application Plan intervention and evaluate results 1:45 to 3:00 Framing function from an unique occupational therapy perspective Some final thoughts Implementing changes in practice Overcoming obstacles 3:00 to 3:30 Break 3:30 to 4:30 Implementing changes in practice Overcoming obstacles (continued) Final reflections Note. The schedule presented here may vary, depending on group interest and needs. Exact times for breaks and lunch also may vary slightly, depending on the schedule of the course setting.

Selected References Fisher, A. G. (2013). Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: Same, same or different? Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20, 162 173. DOI: 10.3109/11038128.2012. 754492 Fisher, A. G. (2009). Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model: A model for planning and implementing top down, client-centered, and occupation-based interventions. Ft. Collins, CO: Three Star Press. Fisher, A. G., & Griswold, L. A. (2013). Performance skills: Implementing performance analyses to evaluate quality of occupational performance. In B. B. Schell, G. Gillen, M. Scaffa, & E. Cohn (Eds.), Willard & Spackman s occupational therapy (12th ed., pp. 249 264). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Fisher, A. G., & Jones, K. (in press). Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model. In P. Kramer, J. Hinojosa, & C. B. Royeen (Eds.). Perspectives In Occupational Therapy (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. (Note. For additional references, go to http://www.innovativeotsolutions.com/content/otipm/references/)

Evaluation and goal-setting phase Intervention phase Reevaluation phase Establish client-centered performance context Identify resources and limitations within client-centered performance context Develop therapeutic rapport and work collaboratively with client Identify client s reported and prioritized strengths and problems of occupational performance Observe client s performance of prioritized tasks and implement performance analyses Define and describe task actions the client does and does not perform effectively Clarify or interpret the reason(s) for client s problems of occupational performance Select the compensatory model Select a model for education and teaching Select a model for occupational skills training (acquisitional model) Plan and implement adaptive occupation to compensate for decreased occupational skill Plan and implement educational programs for groups focused on performance of daily life tasks Plan and implement acquisitional occupation to reacquire or develop occupational skill Reevaluate for enhanced and satisfying occupational performance Establish, finalize, or redefine client-centered and occupation-focused goals Select a model for enhancement of person factors and body functions (restorative model) Plan and implement restorative occupation to restore or develop person factors and body functions Adapted from: Fisher, A. G. (2009). Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model: A model for planning and implementing top-down, client-centered, and occupation-based interventions. Fort Collins CO: Three Star Press. (Revised June 2013)

Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM) Note Taking Worksheet Environmental Client-centered Performance Context: Resources and Limitations Consider past, present, and future or each Role Motivational Task Cultural Social Societal Body function Temporal Adaptation Reason for referral Strengths and Problems of Reported Occupational Performance Tasks performed well and/or with satisfaction Task performed with problems and/or with dissatisfaction Tasks potentially problematic

Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM) Note Taking Worksheet Actions (Performance Skills) Performed Effectively or Ineffectively Motor skill Behavior (action) observed Judgment

Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM) Note Taking Worksheet Actions (Performance Skills) Performed Effectively or Ineffectively Process skill Behavior (action) observed Judgment

Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM) Note Taking Worksheet ADL Motor and ADL Process Skill Specific Baseline Statements Skills included in the cluster Specific baseline statement

Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM) Note Taking Worksheet Actions (Performance Skills) Performed Effectively or Ineffectively Social interaction skill Behavior (action) observed Judgment

Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM) Note Taking Worksheet Social Interaction Skill Specific Baseline Statements Skills included in the cluster Specific baseline statement

Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM) Documentation Worksheet Background information Reason for referral Reported current level of performance Priorities Observed current status (global baseline) Actions of performance (performance skills) of most concern (specific baseline) Goals Interpretation Intervention plan Potential to benefit from intervention

THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK

References: Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model (OTIPM) Ericksen, J. B. (2009). Critical reflections on school-based occupational therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17, 64-69. Fisher, A. G. (2013). Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: Same, same or different? Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20, 162 173. Fisher, A. G. (2009). Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model: A model for planning and implementing top down, client-centered, and occupation-based interventions. Ft. Collins, CO: Three Star Press. Fisher, A. G. (2006). Overview of performance skills and client factors. In H. M. Pendleton, & W. Schultz-Krohn (Eds.), Pedretti s occupational therapy: Practice skills for physical dysfunction (6th ed., pp. 372-402). St. Louis MO: Mosby Elsevier. Fisher, A. G. (1998). Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework: 1998 Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 509-521. Fisher, A. G., Atler, K., & Potts, A. (2007). Effectiveness of occupational therapy with frail community living older adults. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 14, 240-249. Fisher, A. G., Bryze, K., Hume, V, & Griswold, L. A. (2007). School AMPS: School Version of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (2nd ed.). Ft. Collins, CO: Three Star Press. Fisher, A. G., & Griswold, L. A. (2013). Performance skills: Implementing performance analyses to evaluate quality of occupational performance. In B. B. Schell, G. Gillen, M. Scaffa, & E. Cohn (eds.), Willard & Spackman s occupational therapy (12th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Fisher, A. G., & Griswold, L. A. (2014). Evaluation of Social Interaction (3 nd ed.). Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press. Fisher, A. G., & Jones, K. B. (in press). Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. Vol. 1: Development, standardization, and administration manual (8th ed.). Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press. Fisher, A. G., & Jones, K. B. (in press). Occupational Therapy Intervention Process Model. In P. Kramer, J. Honojosa, & C. B. Royeen (Eds.). Perspectives in Occupational Therapy (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis. Fisher, A. G., & Nyman, A. (2011). OTIPM: En model för ett professionellt resonemang som främjar bästa praxis i arbetsterapi (FOU-rapport 2007) [OTIPM: A model for professional reasoning that promotes best practice in occupational therapy] (revised ed.). Nacka, Sweden: Förbundet Sveriges Arbetsterapeuter.

Hällgren, M., & Kottorp, A. (2005). Effects of occupational therapy program in activities of daily living and awareness of disability in persons with intellectual disabilities. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52, 350-359. Kottorp, A., Hällgren, M., Bernspång, B., & Fisher, A. G. (2003). Client-centred occupational therapy for persons with mental retardation: Implementation of an intervention programme in activities of daily living tasks. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 10, 51-60. Lindström, M., Hariz, G. M., & Bernspång, B. (2012). Dealing with real-life challenges: Outcome of a home-based occupational therapy intervention for people with severe psychiatric disability. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 32, 5 13. Simmons, D. C., & Griswold, L. A. (2010). Using the Evaluation of Social Interaction in a community-based program for persons with traumatic brain injury. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17, 49-56. Zingmark, M., Fisher, A. G., Rocklöv, J., & Nilsson, I. (2014). Occupation-focused interventions for well older people: An exploratory randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 21, 447 457.