Lincoln Park Public Schools Occupational Therapist Evaluation
|
|
|
- Gordon Cannon
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lincoln Park Public Schools Occupational Therapist Evaluation Occupational Therapist: Evaluator: Date: DOMAIN: Planning and Preparation COMPONENT Ineffective 1Point Minimally Effective 2 Points Effective 3 Points Highly Effective 4 Points 1a Demonstrating knowledge and skill in school- based occupational therapy 1b Establishing goals for the therapy program appropriate to the setting and the students served 1c Demonstrating knowledge of district, state, and federal regulations and guidelines 1d Demonstrating knowledge of resources, both within and beyond the school and district 1e Planning occupational therapy services, integrated with the general education curriculum, to meet the needs of students being served in a school- based program 1f Developing a plan to appraise occupational therapy services to meet the needs of students within a school- based program Occupational therapist s plan and practice demonstrates little or no knowledge and skill in the application of therapeutic services within a school- based program. Occupational therapist has not established clear goals for the therapy program, or they are inappropriate to either the situation or the age of the students. Occupational therapist demonstrates little or no knowledge of governmental regulations and procedures as they pertain to the application of occupational therapy within a school- based program. Occupational therapist demonstrates little or no knowledge of resources for students, school personnel, and/or the therapists available through the school or district. The plan for occupational therapy services consist of a random collection of unrelated activities, lacking coherence, a relevant clinical rationale, unrelated to the students curriculum and/or the demands of the educational environment. Occupational therapist has no plan to appraise services or resists suggestions that such an appraisal is important. Occupational therapist s plan and practice demonstrates basic knowledge and skill in the application of therapeutic services within a school- based program. Occupational therapist s goals for the therapy program are rudimentary, and are only partially suitable to the situation and the age of the students. Occupational therapist demonstrates basic knowledge of governmental regulations and procedures as they pertain to the application of occupational therapy within a school- based program. Occupational therapist demonstrates basic knowledge of resources for students, school personnel, and/or the therapists available through the school or district. The plan for occupational therapy services are based on relevant clinical rationale, and include minimally appropriate activities, but do not fully address the student s needs to participate in the curriculum and/or access the educational environment. Occupational therapist has a rudimentary plan to appraise the provided therapeutic services delivered within the school- based program. Occupational therapist s plan and practice demonstrates thorough knowledge and skill in the application of therapeutic services within a school- based program and the motoric interventions specific to the identified needs of the students receiving services. Occupational therapist s goals for the therapy program are clear and appropriate to the situation in the school and to the age of the students. Occupational therapist demonstrates - thorough knowledge of governmental regulations and procedures as they pertain to the application of occupational therapy within a school- based program. Occupational therapist demonstrates thorough knowledge of resources for students, school personnel, and/or the therapists available through the school or district and some familiarity with resources outside the district. The plan for coherent occupational therapy services is based on relevant clinical rationale, includes diagnostically relevant activities, and is related to the student s ability to access the curriculum across educational environments. Occupational therapist s plan to appraise the provided therapeutic services is organized around clear goals and the collection of evidence correlates to the goals of the students being served. Occupational therapist s plan and practice demonstrates extensive knowledge and skill in the application of therapeutic services within a school- based program. The therapeutic practices/interventions build upon knowledge of best practices. Occupational therapist s goals for the therapy program are appropriate to the situation in the school and to the age of the students, and have been developed collaboratively with relevant school stakeholders. Occupational therapist s knowledge of governmental regulations and procedures is extensive as it pertains to the application of occupational therapy within a school- based program; Occupational therapist takes a leadership role in reviewing and revising district therapeutic practices. Occupational therapist demonstrates extensive knowledge of resources for students, school personnel, and/or the therapists available both in and outside the district and seeks out whatever resources necessary in order to meet the needs of students receiving therapeutic services within the school and district. Occupational therapist s plan is highly coherent and serves to support students individually and/or in groups within the broader educational program and community. OT s plan to appraise the therapeutic services of the school- based program utilizes multiple sources of evidence and establishes a clear path toward improving the service delivery on an ongoing basis based upon student needs and school setting. Page 1
2 DOMAIN: Environment COMPONENT Ineffective 1Point Minimally Effective 2 Points Effective 3 Points Highly Effective 4 Points 2a Establishing rapport with students 2b Organizing time effectively Therapeutic interactions between the Occupational therapist and the students are negative or inappropriate; students affect and participation in therapy indicate discomfort with the therapist. Occupational therapist lacks time- management skills. This results in confusion, missed deadlines for evaluations and meetings, an inconsistent therapy schedule, or not completing paperwork in a timely manner. Therapeutic interactions between the Occupational therapist and the students are generally appropriate, but may be characterized by occasional actions of insensitivity to the needs of the students involved in therapy. Occupational therapist s time- management skills are moderately well developed. The Occupational therapist meets deadlines for evaluations and meetings, sees some students for therapy based on the set schedule and completes most paperwork in a timely manner. Therapeutic interactions between the Occupational therapist and the students are positive and respectful, reflecting warmth and empathy for the needs of the students; students affect and participation indicate their receptivity to the provision of therapy. Occupational therapist s time- management skills are effective. The Occupational therapist has clearly defined schedules for student therapy, meets all deadlines for paperwork, and completes the preparations necessary for student meetings in an efficient manner. Therapeutic interactions between the Occupational therapist and the students reflect a high degree of comfort and trust in the relationship as demonstrated by the active engagement in the therapeutic activities delivered by the therapist. Occupational therapist demonstrates excellent time- management skills. The Occupational therapist completes all timelines for evaluating students, prepares effectively for student meetings, provides therapy for students on his/her caseload and establishes a cohesive schedule that is executed in both an efficient and dependable manner. 2c Managing therapy procedures including the groupings of students, materials/ supplies, provision of consultative supports and transitions The Occupational therapist provides no procedures for consultative support for staff. Provision of therapy does not reflect appropriate grouping of students, does not have materials/supplies prepared in advance, and does not transition in a timely manner. The Occupational therapist is not responsive to staff concerns. No standards of student conduct have been established and the Occupational therapist disregards or fails to address negative student behavior during evaluation or therapy. The Occupational therapist has established some procedures for consultative support for staff. Provision of therapy reflects minimally appropriate grouping of students, some materials/supplies prepared in advance, and occasionally transitions in a timely manner. The Occupational therapist is somewhat responsive to staff concerns. The Occupational therapist has established effective consultative support for staff. Provision of therapy reflects appropriate grouping of students, materials/supplies prepared in advance, and the Occupational therapist transitions in a timely manner. The Occupational therapist is responsive to staff concerns. The Occupational therapist has established proactive consultative support for staff. Provision of therapy reflects diagnostically relevant grouping of students, materials/supplies consistently prepared in advance, and the Occupational therapist transitions in a timely manner. The Occupational therapist is responsive to all relevant stakeholders involved in the educational services provided to students. 2d Establishing standards of conduct for the students receiving therapy Occupational therapist has clear rules of conduct in the evaluation and therapy session that are inconsistently enforced and attempts to monitor and correct negative student behavior during evaluation and therapy are provided with only partial success. Occupational therapist has clear rules of conduct in the evaluation and therapy session that are consistently enforced and the attempts to monitor and correct negative student behavior are successful. Rules of conduct are posted and accessible to students. Occupational therapist has clear rules of conduct in the evaluation and therapy session that are consistently enforced and the attempts to monitor and correct negative student behavior are successful. Rules of conduct are accessible to students and discussed with the students. Students engage in self- monitoring of behavior as appropriate. The available space is organized and well suited to the planned therapeutic activities. The Occupational therapist adapts or modifies the available space to meet the needs of students receiving therapeutic services or finds an alternative space. The Occupational therapist seeks out additional equipment, materials and resources to enhance the achievement of therapeutic goals. 2e Utilizing available space for testing of students and providing therapy The available space is disorganized. The Occupational therapist makes no attempt to modify the available space or to find alternative space. Physical resources are unavailable. The available space is fairly organized. The Occupational therapist makes some attempt to modify the available space or to find an alternative space. Physical resources are difficult to find when needed. The available space is well organized. The Occupational therapist adapts or modifies the available space to meet the needs of students receiving therapeutic services or finds an alternative space. Physical resources are available when needed. Page 2
3 DOMAIN: Service Delivery COMPONENT Ineffective 1Point Minimally Effective 2 Points Effective 3 Points Highly Effective 4 Points 3a Responding to referrals and evaluating student needs 3b Developing and implementing treatment goals to maximize students successes 3c Engaging students in therapeutic services 3d Collecting information and writing reports 3e Demonstrating flexibility and responsiveness Occupational therapist fails to respond to written referrals upon receipt of documentation within the mandated time frame. The Occupational therapist fails to develop therapy goals suitable for students, or goals are mismatched with the findings of assessments. Therapy activities, materials, and groupings of students are inappropriate to meet the goals set for the students involved in therapeutic services resulting in little to no student engagement. Occupational therapist neglects to gather relevant information on which to base therapy goals; reports are inaccurate or unsubstantiated. Occupational therapist adheres to the IEP goals and benchmarks, in spite of evidence of its inadequacy. Minutes of service are not correlated to the student(s) goals and are insufficient to meet the student s needs. Occupational therapist responds to written referrals within the mandated time frame, but response does not fully address the identified areas of concern listed in the referral and/or initiates only portions of the assessments defined in the requested referral. Occupational therapist s goals for students are only partially suitable for them or the alignment lacks connection with identified individual needs. Therapy activities, materials, and groupings of students are moderately appropriate to achieve the goals set for the students involved in therapeutic services resulting in moderate student engagement Occupational therapist gathers limited information on which to base therapy goals; reports are accurate, but lacking in clarity and only partially substantiated. Occupational therapist makes modest changes in the interventions and documents the changes in the progress reports, but does not amend the IEP when confronted with evidence of the need for change. Student s needs are considered when assigning minutes of service. The Occupational therapist responds to a written referral within the mandated time frame and provides a clear explanation of interventions and/or assessments, which have been aligned to the identified areas of need within the referral. Occupational therapist s goals for students are diagnostically aligned with identified needs and individual goals are appropriately assessed in the students educational plans. Therapy activities, materials, and groupings of students are fully appropriate to achieve the goals set for the student(s) involved in therapy. Students are fully engaged and the therapy sessions illustrate a diagnostically aligned level of challenge to achieve the intended performance from the students. Occupational therapist gathers sufficient information on which to base therapy goals; reports are accurate and substantiated. Occupational therapist amends the IEP when there is evidence of a need for change and makes revisions in the therapy program, as indicated. Students needs are monitored on an ongoing basis as a part of the determination of their needs for services. Occupational therapist is proactive in responding to written referrals within the mandated time frame and completes the indicated assessments documented in the referral with clear explanations of the interventions/assessments that are provided. The Occupational therapist collaborates with all appropriate stakeholders involved with the student s educational program. Occupational therapist develops comprehensive goals for students, finding ways to meet student needs and incorporate the environmentally relevant interventions that correspond with assessment data. Student progress is documented to measure rate of progress and update goals as appropriate. Therapy activities, materials, and groupings of students are effective in achieving the goals set for the student(s) involved in therapy. As applicable, the students are able to demonstrate independence in the execution of the therapeutic activities resulting in improved performance from the students. Occupational therapist is proactive in gathering relevant information, interviewing relevant staff and parents, if necessary; reports are accurate, clearly written, and substantiated. Occupational therapist amends the IEP when there is evidence of a need for a change in services. Revisions of therapy goals are coordinated with the student s demonstrated level of need and minutes of service are adjusted accordingly. Evidence- based practices are used to determine if adjustment in goals, benchmarks, and/or minutes of service are needed. Page 3
4 DOMAIN: Professional Responsibilities 4a Reflecting on practice COMPONENT Ineffective 1Point Minimally Effective 2 Points Effective 3 Points Highly Effective 4 Points 4b Maintaining an effective and organized data management system Occupational therapist does not reflect on practice, or the reflections are inaccurate or self- serving. Occupational therapist is unable to identify any evidence- based practice to support therapeutic interventions. Occupational therapist s data management system is either nonexistent or inappropriate; it cannot be used to monitor student progress or to adjust therapeutic goals. Occupational therapist s reflection on practice is moderately accurate and objective without citing specific examples, and with only global suggestions as to how it might be improved. Occupational therapist demonstrates a vague understanding of evidence- based practice and how it relates to the provision of therapeutic interventions. Occupational therapist has developed a rudimentary or insufficient data management system for monitoring student progress and occasionally uses it to adjust therapeutic goals. Occupational therapist s reflection provides an accurate and objective description of practice, citing specific evidence. Occupational therapist makes some specific suggestions as to how the therapy program might be improved through use of evidence- based practice. Occupational therapist has developed an organized data management system for monitoring student progress and uses it to update therapeutic goals. Occupational therapist s reflection is highly accurate and perceptive, citing specific evidence. Occupational therapist draws on an extensive repertoire of therapeutic interventions to suggest alternative strategies and consistently incorporates evidence- based practices. Occupational therapist has developed an effective data management system for monitoring student progress across settings and uses it to update therapeutic goals. Occupational therapist uses the system to communicate with stakeholders. 4c Communicating with parents, staff, and administrators Occupational therapist is unavailable to stakeholders for questions and planning and does not provide background material when requested. Occupational therapist is available to stakeholders for questions and planning and provides background material when requested. Occupational therapist initiates contact with staff to provide information pertaining to students and documents consultation/collaboration in progress notes and data collection. Parents are informed as needed. Occupational therapist seeks out staff to provide information pertaining to students, solicits their perspectives on individual students, and documents consultation/collaboration in progress notes and data collection. Parents are informed on an ongoing basis. 4d Participating in a professional community Occupational therapist s relationships with colleagues are negative or self- serving, and Occupational therapist avoids being involved in school and district events and/or projects. Occupational therapist s relationships with colleagues are cordial, and Occupational therapist participates in school events and/or projects when specifically requested. Occupational therapist participates in school and district events and/or projects and maintains positive and productive relationships with colleagues. Occupational therapist makes a substantial contribution to school and district events and/or projects and assumes a leadership role with colleagues. 4e Growing and developing professionally Occupational therapist does not participate in professional development activities, even when such activities are clearly needed for the development of skills. The Occupational therapist is resistant to feedback from supervisors or colleagues. Occupational therapist s participates in professional development activities that are convenient or are required. The Occupational therapist accepts, with some reluctance, feedback from supervisors and colleagues. Occupational therapist seeks opportunities for professional development based on an individual assessment of need and shares expertise with others. The Occupational therapist welcomes feedback from supervisors and colleagues. Occupational therapist seeks out opportunities for professional development based upon individualized assessment of need and contributes to the professional development of others through such activities as workshops/staff development to colleagues. Additionally, the Occupational therapist seeks constructive feedback from supervisors and colleagues as appropriate in the pursuit of his/her ongoing professional growth. Page 4
5 COMPONENT Ineffective 1Point Minimally Effective 2 Points Effective 3 Points Highly Effective 4 Points 4f Showing professionalism Occupational therapist is not trustworthy or dependable in his/her interactions with colleagues, students and the public. The Occupational therapist fails to comply with school and district policies and practices. Occupational therapist violates practices of confidentiality as defined by state and federal law. Occupational therapist is trustworthy and dependable in interactions with colleagues, students, and the public. The Occupational therapist complies minimally with school and district policies and practices. Occupational therapist provides moderate advocacy for students, and does not violate practices of confidentiality. Occupational therapist displays high standards of honesty, integrity, and confidentiality in documentation and interactions with colleagues, students, and the school community Occupational therapist advocates for students when needed. The Occupational therapist complies fully and voluntarily with school and district policies and practices and maintains confidentiality as required by state and federal law. Occupational therapist demonstrates the highest standards of ethical conduct, inclusive of confidentiality in documentation and sound therapeutically meaningful interactions with colleagues, students and the school community. Occupational therapist consistently advocates for students and takes a leadership role with colleagues. Page 5
6 Domain 1 Planning & Preparation Documentation: Domain 1 Planning & Preparation Strengths: Domain 1 Planning & Preparation Opportunities for Growth: Domain 2 Environment Documentation: Domain 2 Environment Strengths: Domain 2 Environment Opportunities for Growth: Page 6
7 Domain 3 Service Delivery Documentation: Domain 3 Service Delivery Strengths: Domain 3 Service Delivery Opportunities for Growth: Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities Documentation: Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities Strengths: Domain 4 Professional Responsibilities Opportunities for Growth: Page 7
8 Additional Comments: Date Reviewed: Signatures: Occupational Therapist Signature Evaluator Signature Page 8
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Psychologist Evaluation
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Psychologist Evaluation Psychologist: Evaluator: Date: DOMAIN: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning Psychologist demonstrates little or no Psychologist inconsistently
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Psychologist Evaluation
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Psychologist Evaluation Psychologist: Evaluator: Date: DOMAIN: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning Psychologist uses a wide range of assessment Psychologist consistently
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Social Worker
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Social Worker School Social Worker: Evaluator: Date: DOMAIN: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning Social worker displays little Social worker displays foundational
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Social Worker
Lincoln Park Public Schools School Social Worker School Social Worker: Evaluator: Date: DOMAIN: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning 1a content and application in the practice of social work services
Kankakee School District No. 111 School Social Worker Performance Evaluation
Kankakee School District No. 111 School Social Worker Performance Evaluation School Year: 213-214 Job Classification: Certified Last Name: Document Type: Evaluation First Name: School: Department: Evaluator:
DOMAIN 1: School Psychologists: Planning and Preparation
DOMAIN 1: School Psychologists: Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students 1b: Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent
School Psychologist Evaluation
1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST FOR DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION little or no knowledge
Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation
Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation Teacher Consultant: Evaluator: Date: Domain 1: Planning and Preparing for Student Learning The teacher consultant uses a wide
DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students Psychologist demonstrates little or no knowledge
Speech Language Pathologist Framework for Professional Practice - Evidence of Performance
1 Speech Language Pathologist Framework for Professional Practice - Evidence of Performance DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1a Demonstrating knowledge and skill in the specialist therapy area; holding
Kankakee School District No. 111 School Psychologist Performance Evaluation
Kankakee School District No. 111 School Psychologist Performance Evaluation School Year: 213-214 Job Classification: Certified Last Name: Document Type: Evaluation First Name: School: Department: Evaluator:
School Psychologist Rubric Domain 1: Planning and Preparation LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE 1 UNSATISFACTORY 2 BASIC 3 PROFICIENT 4 DISTINGUISHED
School Psychologist Rubric Domain 1: Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrates knowledge of psychology and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students School Psychologist demonstrates
Guidance Counselor -Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Guidance Counselor -Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component Developing refers to instructors who have been teaching three years or less 1a. Demonstrating knowledge of counseling
NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions
Psychologist: Date: School Year: Building: Assignment: Evaluation Status: Summative Evaluation Directions The purposes of the summative evaluation conference are: 1) to review and discuss the contents
DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL COUNSELORS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
DOMAIN 1 FOR SCHOOL COUNSELORS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques Counselor demonstrates little understanding of counseling theory and techniques.
Domain 1 for School Counselors: Planning and Preparation L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Domain 1 for School Counselors: Planning and Preparation L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques Counselor demonstrates little understanding
DANIELSON FRAMEWORK SCHOOL COUNSELORS
DANIELSON FRAMEWORK SCHOOL COUNSELORS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent development Establishing
DOMAIN 1: Planning and Preparation for School Counselors
DOMAIN 1: Planning and Preparation for School Counselors 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques 1b: Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent development 1c: Establishing
MODIFIED DANIELSON INSTRUCTIONAL FRAMEWORK: SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS
CRITERION 1: KNOWLEDGE AND SCHOALRSHIP INA SPECIAL FIELD 1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students no knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments
School Nurse Evaluation Rubric
COLLINSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 School Nurse Evaluation Rubric Developed Around the Professional Practice Domains Identified by Charlotte Danielson* *Certified Specialist Input from
FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT VERSION 1.0. School Psychologist Evaluation Rubric
FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR BOROUGH SCHOOL DISTRICT School Psychologist Evaluation Rubric Developed Around the Professional Practice Domains Identified by Charlotte Danielson The FNSBSD Evaluation Plan identifies
APPR. Supplement B2. Specialized Services (School Psychologists, Counselors, Social Workers) August 30, 2012
APPR Supplement B2 Specialized Services (School Psychologists, Counselors, Social Workers) August 30, 2012 Frameworks for Specialized Services The Framework for Teaching is just that----a framework for
School Psychologist Evaluation Rubric
COLLINSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 School Psychologist Evaluation Rubric Developed Around the Professional Practice Domains Identified by Charlotte Danielson* *Certified Specialist Input
DOMAIN 1: School Nurses: Planning and Preparation
DOMAIN 1: School Nurses: Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating Medical knowledge and skill in nursing techniques 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Child and Adolescent Development 1c: Establishing Goals
NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE GUIDANCE COUNSELOR EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions
Counselor: Date: School Year: Building: Assignment: Evaluation Status: Summative Evaluation Directions The purposes of the summative evaluation conference are: 1) to review and discuss the contents of
AR TESS SCHOOL COUNSELOR RUBRIC
1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Counselor demonstrates little or no understanding of counseling theory and techniques. 1a: Critical Attributes
SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL NURSE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM
SWCCCASE SPECIAL EDUCATION SCHOOL NURSE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM Opening the world through education to children and young adults with diverse abilities Name: Assignment: Evaluator: Program: Completion
Van Buren School District Teacher Evaluation Revised 9/05/14 Speech Language Pathologist
Van Buren School District Teacher Evaluation Revised 9/05/14 Speech Pathologists are required to participate in all aspects of TESS and the VBSD Teacher Evaluation Plan. Speech Pathologist will follow
VOLUSIA FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING School Counselor
1 UNSATISFACTORY Domain 1 : Planning and Preparation 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Content The rarely practices professional competence in the delivery of school counseling and student service delivery
Psychologist uses a limited number of psychological instruments with little or no flexibility to evaluate students.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST S DOMAIN 1: PLANNING, PREPARATION AND CURRICULUM 1a: Demonstrating knowledge and skill in using psychological instruments to evaluate students -Use of appropriate, variety and current
DOMAIN 1 FOR SOCIAL WORKERS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT
DOMAIN 1 FOR SOCIAL WORKERS: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of School Social Work practices, theory,
How To Be A School Social Worker
Name of Clinician: Name of Evaluator: School(s): RUBRIC FOR CHILD STUDY TEAM SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions
Teacher: Date: School Year: Building: Assignment: Evaluation Status: Summative Evaluation Directions The purposes of the summative evaluation conference are: 1) to review and discuss the contents of the
Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent
Form1: FfT Rubrics Special Education Teacher Name: Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent 1a Demonstrating Knowledge of
School Social Worker - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
School - Observation and Performance Appraisal Rubric for Each Domain/Component Developing refers to instructors who have been teaching three years or less 1a. Demonstrating skill in the content of the
RUBRIC FOR CHILD STUDY TEAM SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION
RUBRIC FOR CHILD STUDY TEAM SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGIST DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (BASIC) PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 1a: Demonstrating
RUBRIC FOR SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION
RUBRIC FOR SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (BASIC) PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 1a: Demonstrating knowledge
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. (2 nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Accuracy Use in future teaching know whether a lesson was effective or achieved its instructional outcomes, or teacher profoundly misjudges the success of a lesson. Teacher has no suggestions for how a
The Danielson Group Behavior Specialists
RUBRIC FOR BEHAVIOR SPECIALISTS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION L E V E L O F P E R F O R M A N C E COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (BASIC) PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 1a: Demonstrating knowledge
Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to Instructional Coaches
Possible examples of how the Framework For Teaching could apply to 1b. Specific Examples 1b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1a. Specific Examples 1a. Demonstrating knowledge of Content and Pedagogy
DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT
DOMAIN 1 FOR READING SPECIALIST: PLANNING AND PREPARATION LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE COMPONENT UNSATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT PROFICIENT EXCELLENT 1a Demonstrating Knowledge Of Content And Pedagogy In planning
PERFORMANCE STANDARD #1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Special Service Providers plan for quality service using a comprehensive approach.
PERFORMANCE STANDARD #1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Special Service Providers plan for quality service using a comprehensive approach. Service and Support Audiologists should know and be able to: Level of
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING
Charlotte Danielson (Adapted for Kentucky Department of Education) KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING Including crosswalk documents connecting to national professional organizations for each category of Other
Westwood Public Schools. Teacher Evaluation Development Team. Guidance Counselor Self Reflection Rubrics
Teacher Evaluation Development Team s Adapted for the Westwood Public Schools Working Draft, Spring 2010 from the work of Marshall, Danielson & Westwood s PPEI I: Planning and Preparation Knowledge of
Pilot School Counselor Evaluation
All evaluations are on a continuous basis. Name: School: Pre-Conference Date: Date of Hire: Evaluator: Post-Conference Date: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Tenure Evaluative Assistance Plan Limited Contract Philosophy:
Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation
Mountain Home School District #193 Formal Evaluation Appendix A NAME: DATE: Certificated Employees new to the profession are responsible for ten components in the four domains. Second year Certificated
SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM
SPEECH LANGUAGE PATHOLOGIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM (Revised 11/2014) 1 Fern Ridge Schools Speech Language Pathologist Performance Review and Evaluation System TABLE OF CONTENTS Timeline of Teacher
Special Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric
St. Michael Albertville Independent School District 885 Excellence is Our Tradition Special Education Teacher Evaluation Rubric Adapted from Danielson, Charlotte. Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework
RUBRIC FOR LIBRARY MEDIA SPECIALISTS (LMS) DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION
DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION 1a: Demonstrating knowledge of current trends in library media practice, information technology, and literature Library Media Specialist demonstrates little or no understanding
IEP Coordinator Evaluation Rubric
COLLINSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 10 IEP Coordinator Evaluation Rubric Developed Around the Professional Practice Domains Identified by Charlotte Danielson* *Certified Specialist Input from
MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS
MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT #2 SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND FORMS Revised 07/03/12 By David R. Skocy, Ph.D. Purpose: NON-TENURED SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKER EVALUATION PROCEDURES
North Dakota PROGRAM REVIEW FOR SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS
North Dakota PROGRAM REVIEW FOR SCHOOL COUNSELING PROGRAMS District: Enrollment: Evaluator: School: Grades in School: Date of Evaluation: *Adapted from the American School Counseling Association National
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Occupational Therapists
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Occupational Therapists Definition of an Effective Occupational Therapist Effective occupational therapists are vital members
SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION RUBRIC
Name: School Year: DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Component 1a Demonstrates knowledge of content and pedagogy In planning, Teacher makes content errors or does not correct errors made by student; Teacher
SASED CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE POST OBSERVATION FEEDBACK FORM DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION. Conference Date
DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION Nurse Conference Date COMPONENTS UNSATISFACTORY BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED 1a. School Nursing School Nurse displays little understanding of prerequisite knowledge
Special Education Teacher
Special Education Teacher DCODE=09000 PLANNING AND PREPARATION ELEMENT Underdeveloped=1 Developing=2 Proficient=3 Exemplary=4 Knowledge of Content Knowledge of Students' Development and Skills Knowledge
DANIELSON FRAMEWORK: PUPIL PERSONNEL PROFESSIONALS: SOCIAL WORKERS
DANIELSON FRAMEWORK: PUPIL PERSONNEL PROFESSIONALS: SOCIAL WORKERS DOMAIN 1: PLANNING AND PREPARATION DOMAIN 2: ENVIRONMENT 1a. Demonstrates Understanding of Professional Research, Theories, Content, Tools,
Planning & Preparation 2 Minimally Effective
Tuscola Intermediate School District School Social Worker Professional Name Date Program Evaluator Elements Planning & Preparation Minimally Highly Knowledge of Student s Development and Skills displays
Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan. Maine Township High School District 207. Our mission is to improve student learning.
2012 2015 Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Plan Maine Township High School District 207 Our mission is to improve student learning. 0 P age Teacher Assistant Performance Evaluation Program Table
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Physical Therapists
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Physical Therapists Definition of an Effective Physical Therapist Effective school physical therapists are vital members of the
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist Effective school psychologists are vital members of the education
Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric
Eugene School District 4J Professional School Counselor Rubric Using leadership, collaboration and advocacy, the Professional School Counselor plans, delivers, manages and promotes a comprehensive guidance
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR
Mississippi Statewide Teacher Appraisal Rubric M-STAR Introduction and Process Guide May 2012 2192_05/12 Contents Introduction... 1 Purpose of Teacher Performance Evaluation... 1 Teacher Evaluation Process...
Garden City Public Schools
Garden City Public Schools RISE: Research-based Inclusive System of Evaluation Garden City, Michigan Professional School Counselor Evaluation Handbook 2012-2013 Prepared by Keith Anleitner, Director of
Job Description of the School Psychologist Reports To: Supervises: Purpose:
Reports To: Supervises: Purpose: Job Description of the School Psychologist Superintendent, Level II or Level III School Psychologists, Director, or Associate or Assistant Superintendent May supervise
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers Definition of an Effective School Social Worker Effective school social workers are vital members of the education
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS Poway Unified School District Teaching Standards Domain I Domain II Domain III Domain IV Domain V Planning and Designing Instruction Element
KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING
Charlotte Danielson (Adapted for Kentucky Department of Education) KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING Including crosswalk documents connecting to national professional organizations for each category of Other
Mercer County Informal Observation Checklist School Nurse
Mercer County Informal Observation Checklist School Nurse Name: Date: Observer: Post-Observation Date: Domain 2 Domain 3 2a. Creating an environment of respect and 3a. Assessing student needs rapport 2b.
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Social Workers Definition of an Effective School Social Worker Effective school social workers are vital members of the
ALIGNING DANIELSON FRAMEWORK WITH ASCA s SCHOOL COUNSELOR COMPETENCIES AND ETHICAL STANDARDS
1a: Demonstrating knowledge of counseling theory and techniques 1b: Demonstrating knowledge of child and adolescent behavior 1c: Establishing goals for the counseling program appropriate to the setting
RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE (CSN) Date Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment. Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE (CSN) Date Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component Failing Needs Improvement Proficient Distinguished 1a: Demonstrating
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School-Based Occupational Therapists
Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School-Based Occupational Therapists Standard 1: School-based therapists demonstrate leadership, advocacy, and collaborative and ethical Element a. Leadership. School-based
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Audiologists
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: Audiologists Definition of an Effective Audiologist Effective audiologists are vital members of the education team. They are
Date Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment
Rubric for BEHAVIOR SPECIALIST/ANALYST (BS/BA) Date Self-Assessment Evaluator Assessment 1a: Demonstrating Knowledge of Behavior Analysis Principles, Laws, Regulations, and Research Domain 1: Planning
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM &PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DIVISION
CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT CURRICULUM & DEVELOPMENT DIVISION Licensed Employee Appraisal System Enhancing Professional Practice Professional Domain Standards and Indicators Levels of Performance Rubric
The MSPA Rubric for Evaluation of School Psychologists
The MSPA Rubric for Evaluation of School Psychologists The Massachusetts School Psychologists Association (MSPA) has developed this rubric for the evaluation of school psychologists for adoption, in part
DPAS II Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators. DPAS II Guide Revised for Specialists
DPAS II Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS II Guide Revised for Specialists Updated, August 2014 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Psychologists Definition of an Effective School Psychologist Effective school psychologists are vital members of the education
Indiana School Nurse Effectiveness Rubric
Indiana School Nurse Effectiveness Rubric This rubric combines many of the professional requirements of a professional School Nurse with those of the RISE Model. It is a working revision of the School
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses
Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses Definition of an Effective School Nurse Effective school nurses are vital members of the education team. They are properly
How To Be A Team Member
The following rating descriptions are examples of the behaviors employees would be demonstrating at each of the four levels of performance. These examples should assist the supervisor and employee during
Halifax County Public Schools. Business and Operations Administrator/Supervisor Evaluation and Final Evaluation Report
Halifax County Public Schools Business and Operations Administrator/Supervisor Evaluation and Final Evaluation Report Approved July 2012 73 74 Halifax County Public Schools Business and Operations Administrator/Supervisor
How To Be A Successful School Nurse
RUBRIC ASSESSMENT: CERTIFIED SCHOOL NURSE (CSN) Date School Nurse Self-assessment Evaluator Assessment Formal Observation Individual Growth Project Intensive Support Plan Summative Domain 1: Planning and
Rubric to Evaluate North Carolina s School-Based Physical Therapists
Rubric to Evaluate North Carolina s School-Based Physical Therapists Standard 1: School-based physical therapists demonstrate leadership. Element a. School-based physical therapists demonstrate leadership
Delaware Performance Appraisal System
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Principals) Principal Practice Rubric Updated July 2015 1 INEFFECTIVE A. DEVELOPS
Performance Evaluation
Competency Exceptional Above Meets Partially Meets Overview of Ratings TRANSFORMATIVE work. In addition to exceeding performance goals, the organization (department, unit or program) is fundamentally better
Non-Instructional Rubric Assessments. Rubric Assessment: School Psychologist. Rubric Assessment: Occupational/Physical Therapist
APPENDIX G Non-Instructional Rubric Assessments Rubric Assessment: School Psychologist Rubric Assessment: Occupational/Physical Therapist Rubric Assessment: School Social Worker Rubric Assessment: School
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses
2015-16 Rubric for Evaluating Colorado s Specialized Service Professionals: School Nurses Definition of an Effective School Nurse Effective school nurses are vital members of the education team. They are
*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft*
*This is a sample only actual evaluations must completed and submitted in PeopleSoft* Employee information Employee name Position title/department Date of Hire Employee ID number Supervisor s name Today
Summary of the Domains
AASL s L4L Sample School Librarian Performance and Evaluation System INTRODUCTION This system is based on a continuous cycle of assessment and evaluation within four domains of teaching responsibility
SPA PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GENERAL COMPARISON OF EXPECTATION LEVELS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES
(N) (M) (E) Performance consistently does not meet documented expectations and measurements in this area. Performance consistently meets documented expectations and measurements in this area. Performance
