18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 email list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio



Similar documents
King Fire Restoration Project, Eldorado National Forest, Placer and El Dorado Counties, Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

Post-Wildfire Clean-Up and Response in Houston Toad Habitat Best Management Practices

Angora Fire Restoration Activities June 24, Presented by: Judy Clot Forest Health Enhancement Program

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

Nevada Pinyon-Juniper Partnership Proposed Demonstration Area A Brief Introduction. Presented by Jeremy Drew Project Manager Resource Concepts, Inc.

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

FORESTED VEGETATION. forests by restoring forests at lower. Prevent invasive plants from establishing after disturbances

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

HFQLG Project Evaluation Form

Roaring Fork Valley Restoration Strategy

6. NATURAL AREAS FIRE MANAGEMENT

ANGORA FIRE RESTORATION PROJECT

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

Waldo Canyon Fire. Mark Shea Watershed Planning Supervisor August 23, 2012

Past and Current Research on Natural Resource Issues in the Blue Mountains

REPORT TO REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY COMMISSION MEETING OF WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2013 LEECH WATER SUPPLY AREA RESTORATION UPDATE

ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT HABITAT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM HABITAT ENHANCEMENT AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PROPOSAL PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT FUNDING

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Managing Fire Dependent Wildlife Habitat without Fire. A Land Management Practice That: 100 Years of Fire Suppression in Ponderosa pine ecosystems

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Biomass Harvest Guidelines

Increasing the Pace of Restoration and Job Creation on Our National Forests

Project Theory-Climate Change and Traditional Ecological Knowledge Adaption in the Klamath Basin

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

Revision of Land and Resource Management Plan for the Santa Fe National Forest;

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

May 9, Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Power Fire Restoration Project (CEQ# )

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

Non-consumptive use of wildlife. Non-consumptive Use. Non-consumptive Use

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Backyard Buffers that Work for People and Nature by Restoring Ecological Function

Town of Richmond Hill Community Stewardship Program

USDA Forest Service Proposed Soil and Water Restoration Categorical Exclusions Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents

Karuk Tribe Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge within Natural Resource Management

Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA)


Avison Management Services Ltd. COMPANY PROFILE

How To Know If A Forest Service And Bmd Plan Postfire Rehabilitation And Restoration

NPS Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) and Burned Area Rehabilitation (BAR) in the Southern California Landscape

Passive Restoration 101: Framework and Techniques Overview. Amy Chadwick, Great West Engineering August 26, 2015 Butte, America

Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) in Virginia Beach, Virginia. The Resource Protection Area (RPA) and Buffers The First 100 Feet

Prepared By: Tom Parker Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Bolton Resource Management Tract Management Plan TRCA Delegation to Town of Caledon Council. July 8, 2014

Integrated Weed Management in Portland Parks

Healthy Forests Resilient Water Supply Vibrant Economy. Ecological Restoration Institute

SEC PURPOSE. SEC DEFINITIONS. SEC COLLABORATIVE FOREST LANDSCAPE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

The Sustainable Sites Initiative: Future Business Opportunities? 2009 Sustainable Sites Initiative

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

Experienced Planning and Design

Arizona s Large Fires Suppression vs. Restoration. WESTCAS Fall 2011 Meeting Bruce Hallin Manager, Water Rights and Contracts October 27, 2011

Mission Reach Self-Guided Tour Mission Concepción Portal Loop and Mission Reach Phase II Embayment Loop

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

Summary of Pre- and Post-Project Vegetation Survey Results

Techniques and Tools for Monitoring Wildlife on Small Woodlands

Communities and Fire Restoration. The Role of Communities in Restoring Fire as a Natural Process

Integrating Landscape Restoration and CWPP

Increasing water availability through juniper control.

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

STANDARDS FOR RANGELAND HEALTH ASSESSMENT FOR SAGEHEN ALLOTMENT #0208

Integration of Forestry & Wildlife Management

Case Study: The History of the San Juan Headwaters Forest Health Partnership

Forestry Merit Badge Workbook

Wildlifer 2013 Managing Wildlife on Private Lands

Summary of the Second College Grant Master Plan

REPUBLIC OF TURKEY MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS

Markets for Ecosystem Services on Agricultural Lands: Experience and Outlook in the United States

American Forest Foundation (AFF) Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification

NATURAL RESOURCE RESTORATION LESSON PLAN Fix It!

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION. Background

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

Transcription:

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 email list Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio State Representative Krieger State Senators: Roblan, Johnson, and Kruse Governor Brown s office County Commissioners: Curry County Coos County Douglas County Josephine County Del Norte County, CA Siskiyou County, CA

Bandon Port Orford Gold Beach Agness Brookings Crescent City, CA

WRCFC Priorities Priority project types: 1. Unique habitat restoration 2. Aquatic habitats, including fish passable culverts and chronic road sediment reduction 3. Outdoor recreation

Agness

Recommendations from the Wild Rivers Coast Forest Collaborative for the Shasta Agness Project January 2016 Statement of project purpose: The Wild Rivers Coast Forest Collaborative (WRCFC) is a diverse group of stakeholders who work together to create and implement a shared vision to protect and improve the resilience and well-being of watersheds, the forests they contain, and communities in and around National Forest system lands in Southwestern Oregon. WRCFC projects are based upon three primary principles that the collaborative members have chosen as the main priorities: Unique ecosystem restoration Aquatic restoration including road sediment reduction and fish passage culvert replacement Quality access and facilities for roads, trails, and campgrounds Other principles that the group has deemed important in project planning are; managed stands, non-native forest pathogens, hazardous fuels reduction and invasive species. Overall project objectives: WRCFC is proposing that the United States Forest Service (USFS) restore oak savannah environments in the Shasta/Agness planning area (the Shasta Costa watershed and portions of the lower Illinois River watershed) to: restore, maintain, and enhance ecological diversity; to restore watershed processes and functions and to enhance aquatic and riparian habitats; to enhance recreational opportunities, and to protect the overall forest/watershed health in this area.

Categorical recommendations: Below are recommendations from WRCFC for the Shasta Agness Planning Area of the Gold Beach Ranger District of the Rogue River Siskiyou National Forest for the following categories: 1. White and Black Oak Restoration 2. Stream Restoration and Enhancement 3. Riparian Area Management 4. Recreation 5. Roads 6. Wildlife 7. Plantation thinning 8. Sugar pine restoration??? (need to decide if WRCFC wants to propose actions for this separate from #7 above) 9. Cultural?? (need to decide if WRCFC/Tribes want to propose actions) 10. Contracting 11. Monitoring

1. White and Black Oak Restoration. Objective: Restore the entire suite of ecological services, functions, and processes in the white oak/pine woodland/oak savannah ecosystem including herbaceous plants, shrubs and trees in this project area. Our recommendations are as follows: a) Silvicultural treatments: Remove all conifers from oak savannah areas. There will be no thinning of broadleaf trees. Any exceptions? b) Remove conifers in oak woodland areas with these conditions: Soils? Slope? Aspect? c) Snags and downed wood: Remove all conifers to restore the oak ecosystems When the removal of conifers is not logistically or economically feasible, kill the trees to create snags or downed wood. d) Burn piles: Minimize burn piles by lopping and scattering all boles <3 Leave some brush piles for wildlife habitat and sustenance. Remove plastic prior to burning. Establish maximum diameter for burn piles (recommendations?) Mitigate impact by inoculating burned area with dirt from adjacent area. Maximize the benefit of burn piles through creation of and use of biochar.

a) Planting trees, shrubs and grasses: Trees: areas near existing oaks will be priority for planting trees due to need for associated mycorhizal fungi. Barren areas will be planted with nursery stock or from seed (e.g. low elevation Shasta Costa foot hills near the creek, barren area near Agness forest service buildings). Some planted seedlings should be protected with cages to prevent animal browsing. Shrubs: barren meadow areas will need some native shrubs. Herbaceous plants: plant seeds of native species in addition to native grass species in disturbed areas. b) Protecting oak seedlings: Most oak seedlings need caging to reduce grazing by animals (including cattle). c) Prescribed fire: We recommend fall burning to restore and protect native herbaceous plants. Monitor and adaptively manage post-fire to.

Challenges: 1. LSR 2. T&E species Spotted owl Marble murrelet Red tree vole 3. Activation Energy 4. Maintaining energy in the process (while watching paint dry) Successes: 1. Almost complete Project Plan with lots of shared decision space 2. NEPA process has begun 3. Thinning 4. Vegetation surveys 5. Adequate funding 6. Lots of positive attention and local recognition

Contact Information for the Wild Rivers Coast Forest Collaborative Facilitator: Frank A. Burris OSU Extension Service PO Box 488 Gold Beach, OR 97444 541-247-6672 (w) 541-698-7810 (cell) frank.burris@oregonstate.edu Collaborative Coordinator: Chip Weinert 541-251-0063 chip.weinert@gmail.com