660 Utility Supply Comprehensive Plan Section 660



Similar documents
Design Criteria & Service Goals

I. Introduction. 10 minutes

CHECKLIST FOR FILING AN APPLICATION FOR A GROUND AND/OR SURFACE WATER WITHDRAWAL PROJECT IN THE DELAWARE RIVER BASIN

CALIFORNIA AMERICAN WATER LOS ANGELES DISTRICT 2009 GENERAL RATE CASE CHAPTER: 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF APPLICATION

STEAMBOAT LAKE WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT PETITION FOR AMENDMENT TO SERVICE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS. SECTION DESCRIPTION Page

Kansas City s Overflow Control Program

Roseman Technology Site *Caroline County, Virginia 110 Acres Seconds off Interstate 95

SIERRA LAKES COUNTY WATER DISTRICT P.O. Box 1039, Soda Springs, CA (7300 Short Road, Serene Lakes)

Frequently Asked Transmission Pipeline Questions

Gas Marketplace Work? July 9-13, 2007

Addressing Declining Elevations in Lake Mead

2.0 DESIGN CRITERIA FOR WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

Mission 4: Fossil Fuel Power Stations

Birmingham Water Work s EnviroLab Water Quality Operations Division

City of Friendswood FY 2010 Capital Improvements Program - Water & Sewer Projects 5-Year CIP

OUR CONVERSATION TODAY

PART 6 - STANDARD DESIGN AND CALCULATION FORMS 6.1 SANITARY SEWER DATA SHEET

Water Utility Financial Plan and Rates Study

Texas: An Energy and Economic Analysis

DANISH DISTRICT ENERGY PLANNING EXPERIENCE

GEOTHERMAL POTENTIAL OF ABANDONED UNDERGROUND MINES IN OHIO

WATER / WASTEWATER & POWER PROJECTS LAST 5 YEARS. No of Staff Provided by BCE. Overall Project Value (SR)

How To Use A Water Source Heat Pump

OSU Extension FACT SHEET

SPECIAL USE PERMIT JCSA Groundwater Treatment Facility Staff Report for the November 5, 2001, Planning Commission Public Hearing

PIPELINE FUNDAMENTALS. texaspipelines.com

City of El Paso City Plan Commission Staff Report

N O W A V A I L A B L E

Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. Natural Gas Forum October 16, 2007

DeSoto County is not a water service provider and does not operate any

CyberFortress Data Center at Innovation Park Infrastructure and Topology Guide. Innovation Park Charlotte. NC DRAFT V0.

Farm Energy IQ. Energy Buying Options in Deregulated Markets 2/16/2015. Introductions. Deregulation of Energy Markets

INNOVATION AND COST EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO POTABLE WATER PIPE REPLACEMENT STRATEGICALLY FOCUSED ON DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT By

ENGINEERING REPORT FOR PAIES WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM KlTTl MUNICIPALITY, SECTION I, POHNPEI FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA

Altoona Water Authority. Infrastructure Overview

Overview of Long Island Electric Service Territory

SECTION 5.15 ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS

Executive Summary: PA No. 12 Micro-hydro at Graham Hill Water Treatment Plant

CLEAN LINE ENERGY PARTNERS:

Multiple sources of energy will be available, giving the consumer choices. A Higher Percentage of Energy will come from renewable energy sources

PIPELINE ROUTING PERMIT. For A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE DAKOTA AND RAMSEY COUNTIES ISSUED TO NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY D/B/A XCEL ENERGY

Water Water Treatment Plant Tour

Roosevelt Water Conservation District ROOSEVELT WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

TEXAS: SAN ANTONIO San Antonio Protects Edwards Aquifer

Dynamic Modeling Of An Ozone Disinfection Facility

Ponds- Planning, Design, Construction

Maricopa Association of Governments. Technical Memorandum No. 1 INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COSTS. August 2001

Get Into Energy Math Quiz 12 Answer Key Fractions and Decimals

Re: Preliminary Permit Application for the Rose Creek Pumped Storage Project

Natural Gas Markets Update for the Ethanol Industry. Identifying Market Fundamentals and Managing Price Risk

Tokyo Waterworks supports the capital of Tokyo

4 Water supply description

SERVING WITH SUCCESS WILLOWS WATER. Willows Water District 6930 South Holly Circle Centennial, Colorado

Glossary of Terms Avoided Cost - Backfeed - Backup Generator - Backup Power - Base Rate or Fixed Charge Baseload Generation (Baseload Plant) -

Energy Audits Waste Water Treatment Plants

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

Presentation to the Staff Subcommittee on Gas 2010 NARUC Winter Committee Meetings Washington, D.C. February 14, 2010

University of Denver, MBA, Business Administration, 1973 Regis University, BS, Business Administration, 1972

Rainwater Harvesting

Turning Brownfields into Clean Energy. Today s Discussion

Developing Ocean Energy in Ireland. Belmullet Wave Energy Test Site

Remarks of Terrance J. Fitzpatrick President and CEO Energy Association of Pennsylvania March 10, 2011

GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITY APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Page 1 Chapter Design Criteria for Domestic Wastewater Systems

NATURAL GAS PRICES TO REMAIN AT HIGHER LEVELS

H.R Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2007

SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS URBAN WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

INVENTORY OF CITY FACILITIES

A Green Sector Overview

FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT FI (Maui, Water Treatment Facilities)

2007 Operating Budget Capital Budget 2007 Proposed Water and Wastewater Service Rate

Facing The Challenges In Houston s Water System: Past, Present, and Future

CITY OF ORANGE PROPOSED INCREASE OF WATER RATES AND CHARGES FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ) REGARDING ORANGE S PROPOSED WATER RATES AND CHARGES

NATURAL REGIONS OF KENTUCKY

Southern Dallas County Infrastructure Analysis

Lyons Canyon Ranch Draft Environmental Impact Report

Roadmap to a Sustainable Energy Future for the Northern Forest Region

Introduction. So, What Is a Btu?

The Jockey Pump, an Important Part of a Fire Pump System.

BCSE Briefing: Driving US Economic Growth and Jobs. Chris Perrault, Vice President January 26, 2011

Renewable Energy Research

DISTRICT ENERGY ST. PAUL. Achieving Energy Independence

Propane Gas Underground Systems: Residential Infrastructure Requirements and Energy Benefits

NEW COMMERCIAL Rates. Understanding the. Commercial Customers

Vista Ridge Water Transmission & Purchase Agreement

Clean Energy Trends in North Carolina.

Township of Enniskillen. Asset Management Plan

Renewable Energy on Regional Power Grids Can Help States Meet Federal Carbon Standards

Electric Power Systems An Overview. Y. Baghzouz Professor of Electrical Engineering University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Oregon Renewable. Energy. Resources. Inside this Brief. Background Brief on. Overview of Renewable Energy. Renewable Portfolio Standard

Generating Current Electricity: Complete the following summary table for each way that electrical energy is generated. Pros:

SEATTLE STEAM COMPANY FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

NEW JERSEY CENTER OF EXCELLENCE

APPENDIX F. Baker County. Mason Dam Hydroelectric Project FERC No. P Turbidity Monitoring Plan

H.R Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2008

Plan Groundwater Procurement, Implementation and Costs, prepared for the Brazos River Authority, July 2005.

1. Summary. electric grid, strengthen saving programs sponsored by utilities. The project

Portfolio Manager and Green Power Tracking

The Piping System Model a New Life Cycle Document. Elements of the Piping System Model

Transcription:

661 660 Comprehensive Plan Section 660 ELECTRIC SUPPLY THE PAST Early in 1901, Owensboro Municipal Utilities (OMU) began service to the Owensboro incorporated areas and has been Owensboro's major supplier since that time. Owensboro's first electric plant, the Brush Electric Light and Power Company, was organized in 1882. In 1900, the City of Owensboro authorized the purchase of land on Daviess Street, near 14 th Street, as the site of the first municipal-owned power plant. Numerous additions became necessary: a new light and water plant was authorized in 1933; an additional 130,000-kilowatt generator was added in 1953. The Elmer Smith power station, located on US 60 East, went on line in 1964 with a rated capacity of 151,000 Kilowatts; Unit 2, at 265,000 Kilowatts, was added in 1974. OMU added SO 2 scrubbers in 1994 to comply with the Clean Air Act of 1990. Kenergy Corporation, and its predecessor Green River Electric Corporation (GREC) has served the rural areas of Daviess County since 1937. The first stake was driven on a farm on Veach Road in 1937. Acquisitions were made of the Cumberland Public Utilities Company and Tri-City Utilities Company in the 1940s. GREC combined with Henderson Union Electric in July 1999 to form Kenergy Corporation. Kenergy presently serves 14 counties in western Kentucky. THE PRESENT Local Consumption Exhibit 661-T1 shows the change in customers and electric power consumption between 1982 and 1999. Customers increased by 6,722 (18.4%) from 1982 to 1999. From 1982 to 1987, Daviess County power consumption increased by 23.6%. From 1987 to 1999, OMU s customers increased their power consumption by 23.4%; Kenergy consumption data for Daviess County was not available for 1999. Source of Supply Big Rivers Electric in Henderson, Kentucky supplies Kenergy with power. Big Rivers has power plants in Hawesville, Centertown and Sebree, Kentucky. OMU's power sources are located on US 60 East. The two Elmer Smith stations have a combined capacity of 416,000 Kilowatts. They are also interconnected with Kentucky Utilities. Exhibit 663-M1 delineates electric supply districts within Daviess County. Facilities In 1999, OMU had 46.3 miles of transmission lines; having built 31.9 miles of transmission lines between 1963 and 1987. In 2005, Kenergy had 1,227 miles of distribution line in Daviess county and 15 distribution substations located in Daviess County. substations are required to transfer the higher transmission voltages down to lower customer voltages. The electricity is then fed into distribution lines that connect directly to each customer. The following exhibit points out changes since 1982. Exhibit 661-T1: Electric Supply: Customers & Power Usage Measure OMU Kenergy Total 1982 Customers 24,731 11,835 36,566 Megawatt-Hours 538,379 191,443 729,822 1987 Customers 26,111 13,565 39,676 Megawatt-Hours 664,402 237,934 902,336 1999 Customers 25,250 18,038 43,288 Megawatt-Hours 820,829 N/A N/A 2005 Customers 25,407 19,700 45,107 Megawatt-Hours 870,060 *484,152 1,354,212 1982-1987 Change Customers 1,380 1,730 3,110 Percentage 5.6% 14.6% 8.5% Megawatt-Hours 126,023 46,491 172,514 Percentage 23.4% 24.3% 23.6% 1987-1999 Change Customers -861 4,473 3,612 Percentage -3.3% 33.0% 9.1% Megawatt-Hours 156,427 N/A N/A Percentage 23.5% N/A N/A 1999-2005 Change Customers 157 1,662 1,819 Percentage 0.6% 9.2% 4.2% Megawatt-Hours 49,231 ---- ---- Percentage 6.0% ---- ---- Source: OMU and Kenergy approximate value Exhibit 661-T2: Substations and Lines 1982 1987 1999 2005 %Chng 1982-05 Kenergy lines (miles) 1,067 1,089 1,152 1,227 +15.0% Substations 10 10 N/A 15 N/A OMU lines (miles) N/A N/A 298 301 N/A Substations N/A N/A 16 15 N/A Source: Kenergy & OMU

662 662 Underground Lines Installation of underground electrical distribution lines is optional for a developer. In 2005, OMU had 62.82 miles of lines underground. In 2005, Kenergy had approximately 146 miles of underground line in Daviess County. Local estimates have shown the cost of underground versus overhead lines to be approximately the same. Overhead lines have many years experience to back them up, but installation of underground lines is on the increase for several reasons: the equipment is available and ready for installing lines underground; maintenance is much easier; and the visual effect is much more pleasing. Aesthetics has led to much greater demand for underground lines in new residential subdivisions, other new development areas, and in downtown Owensboro. THE FUTURE In the 1980s, conservation became a key to future uses of electrical and other energy sources. The oil crises of the 1970s showed that even if new sources were found, the price could fluctuate dramatically. Since then, research toward efficiency in extracting known sources of energy is another important aspect. The use of renewable or recyclable fuels has been on the rise (wood, used tires), and new building technologies have significantly improved heating and cooling efficiencies. Wind generators, geothermal wells, and solar heating have become alternate sources of energy in some sections of the nation. According to the GREC 1988 Annual Report, Kenergy initiated its geothermal-system marketing program in October 1987. NATURAL GAS SUPPLY HISTORY Atmos Engery Corporation is a public utility in the business of natural gas distribution, serving residential, commercial, and industrial customers in western and central Kentucky. Atmos Energy s Kentucky operations are headquartered in Owensboro, serving more than 182,000 homes and businesses throughout western and central Kentucky. In 1934, western Kentucky Gas Company was founded, initially serving four Kentucky communities with 2,400 customers. Western Kentucky Gas expanded its Kentucky service area over time both through acquisition of exiting gas systems and providing initial service to communities without natural gas service. In December 1980, Western Kentucky Gas merged with Texas American Energy Corporation of Midland, Texas. This association ended in December 1987, when Energas Corporation of Dallas, Texas acquired WKG. In 1989 Energas became ATMOS Energy Corporation. Presently, Atmos Energy is the country s largest natural-gas-only distributor, serving about 3.2 million gas utility customers in 12 states from the Blue Ridge Mountains in the East to the Rocky Mountains in the West. Atmos Energy employs 83 people in Daviess County, 235 people in Kentucky, and more than 4,500 corporate wide. LOCAL CONSUMPTION Atmos Energy served 32, 319 customers in Daviess County as of December 31, 2005. Exhibit 662-T1 illustrates the number of customers and consumption of natural gas (adjusted for normal weather) in Daviess County over the past 23 years. According to Gary Smith, Vice-President of Marketing & Regulatory Affairs, the decrease reflected in residential and commercial usage over time is attributed to improved energy efficiency and conservation measures. The reduction in industrial usage is due to the closing of Green River Steel, which in 1999 was the largest natural gas consumer in Daviess County. Exhibit 662-T1: Gas Customers & Consumption 1982-2005 Type Customers Consumption (MCF) 1982 Residential 22,215 2,457,000 Commercial 2,023 1,156,400 Industrial 32 1,881,200 Total 24,270 5,494,600 1987 Residential 23,524 2,367,600 Commercial 2,161 1,113,000 Industrial 33 1,542,100 Total 25,718 5,022,700 1999 Residential 27,591 2,428,579 Commercial 2,585 1,102,009 Industrial 48 3,237,441 Total 30,224 6,768,029 2005 Residential 29,571 2,263,812 Commercial 2,703 974,181 Industrial 45 2,019,305 Total 32,319 5,257,297 1987-1999 Change Total Increase 4,506 1,745,329 % Increase 17.5% 34.7% 1999-2005 Change Total Increase 2,095-1,510,732 % Increase 6.9% -28.7% Source: Atmos Energy(Customers as of 12/31/2005 & Consumption 12 months ending 9/30/2005) SUPPLY SOURCE Texas Gas transmission is the primary interstate pipeline serving Atmos Energy s Kentucky operations. The Texas Gas transmission system provides access to producing areas in Louisiana and East Texas as well as offshore wells in the gulf of Mexico. There are 34 wells in underground storage fields located in Daviess County at various locations, with a total storage capacity of approximately 4,035,300 MCF (one MCF = 1,000 cu. Ft

663 663 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM The distribution system includes transmission lines, distribution mains, service lines, measuring stations, and pressure regulators. Transmission Lines Two major transmission lines convey gas from, or to, Owensboro. These high-pressure lines are used to convey gas from a source of supply to distribution systems in Owensboro and surrounding communities. Mains A network of 2 to 12-inch pipes distributes gas to customers throughout the Owensboro area. mains normally carry anywhere from 1 to 60 psi with most residential customers only requiring 1/4 psi at their homes. Service Connections and Lines The service connection or line from the distribution main to the customer's property is made by the company, while the service line that continues from the property line to the place of consumption is provided by the customer. Measuring Stations and Pressure Regulators Two common types of aboveground installations are measuring stations and pressure regulating stations. Measuring stations contain large meters that measure gas volumes supplied to the entire system, parts of the system, or major industrial, institutional, and commercial users. The regulator stations maintain constant pressure throughout the system by automatically adjusting flows at interconnections between various capacity lines. Locally, these regulators are in the open and located adjacent to street and road rights-of-way. OUTLOOK According to Gary Smith, Atmos Energy is among the most efficient natural gas utilities in the country. Surveys conducted by the American Gas Association consistently place Atmos energy s Kentucky operations among the top 25% of all U.S. gas utilities in terms of low cost to customers. In an independent audit of major gas utilities in Kentucky, conducted in 2002 by the KY Public Service Commission, Atmos Energy was commended for having gas costs consistently among the lowest in the state and for having distribution costs that have long been the lowest in Kentucky, and are among the lowest in the United States. Despite recent national increases in the cost of natural gas supply, Atmos Energy s rates remain competitive with other fuels available to customers. Future growth largely depends on area economic trends. WATER DISTRICTS Within Daviess County, six separate water districts supply service to nearly 37,000 customers. Exhibit 664-Tl provides information on these water districts. The Southeast Daviess County and West Daviess County Water districts transmit water through 12-inch pipes, while the other water districts (except OMU) primarily use six-inch pipes. Owensboro Municipal Utilities largest pipe size is 30 inches. The Southeast Water District s system includes approximately 6,130 feet of 16 water line, approximately 2 miles of 12 lines, 5 miles of 10 line and about 2 miles or 8 line with the remainder being 6 or smaller Exhibit 663-T1: Daviess County Water Districts Customers Storage Capacity Water District 1999 2006 1998 2006 SE Daviess Co. 4,905 5,925 1,770,000 1,770,000 W. Daviess Co. 3,516 4,315 1,160,000 1,460,000 E. Daviess Co. 3,518 4,256 1,550,000 2,550,000 Ohio County 404 456 1,550,000 1,550,000 OMU 23,362 24,000 14,000,000 14,000,000 Whitesville 1,193 1,300* 450,000 450,000 TOTAL 30,178 40,252 20,450,000 21,780,000 Source: GRADD & water districts * approximate per City of Whitesville From 1999 to 2006, customers throughout the county have increased by over 33% and storage capacity by 6.5%. The Southeast Daviess County Water District experienced the highest numeric increases in customers, followed by the West Daviess County Water District and the East Daviess County Water District. The greatest increase in storage capacity occurred in the East Daviess County Water District. WATER SUPPLY FACILITIES Raw Water Sources The largest supplier of water in the county is Owensboro Municipal Utilities (OMU). All customers, except for the 404 customers supplied by the Ohio County Water District, are supplied with water from the 33 wells that are owned and operated by OMU. The Ohio County Water District draws its water from the Green and Rough rivers. Since OMU s wells supply over 99 percent of all water needs for the county, it is this primary source of supply that is the focus of this report. WATER SUPPLY A clean, pure supply of water fit for human consumption is one of the elementary essentials needed to sustain human life. The general elements of a water supply system include: A source of supply (wells, streams, or lakes) A conduit to convey water from the source of supply to the community Storage facilities for usable water A treatment plant to remove impurities A distribution system of pipes to deliver water to consumers

664 664 Exhibit 664-M1: Electric Districts in Daviess County

665 665 According to research presented in Alpha, the water drawn from the 33 wells comes from the Alluvium Formation of the Quaternary System. The depths of wells range from about 100 feet to 130 feet. These wells are located in the eastern portion of the City between the Ohio River and U.S. Highway 60 East, in proximity to the OMU water treatment plants (See Exhibit 665- M1). OMU plans 5 new wells by 2005. The Alluvium Formation, from which the water supply is derived, is an excellent aquifer. Geological publications prepared by the Kentucky and United States Geological surveys indicate that all developed portions of Owensboro and the large flat areas south and west of Owensboro and west of Bon Harbor Hills are underlain by this Formation. This aquifer is capable of large yields of 750 to 1,000 gallons per minute (GPM) for single wells and up to 4,000 GPM for special installations. During recent droughts, the static water level dropped only 2-3 inches, indicating an abundant supply of raw water for the community. Pumping Facilities Four electrical pumps are available for high service pumping of treated water from the underground storage reservoir into the distribution system at Plant A. One electrical pump with a 10 million gallon per day pumping capacity is located outside Plant A. The other three electrical pumps are inside the treatment plant and have a total capacity of 18 MGD - two at 7.5 MGD each and one at 3 MGD. A portable generator capable of running one of the 7.5-MGD pumps is available for emergencies. The total capacity of all pumping facilities at Plant A is 28 MGD. Water treatment capacity for the plant is 20 MGD; however, pumping facilities must be greater than the actual water delivery per day, because there are losses in the system from the beginning when raw water is taken out from the aquifer through processing and delivery. Also, the pumping facility must remain higher than average delivery to handle emergency situations when one or more pumping facilities is out of order on days of maximum demand. The Cavin plant came on line during the mid-1990s and is located approximately one mile east of Plant A on U.S. 60. The plant has three electrical pumps rated at 5 MGD each. The portable generator can operate one of the pumps in an emergency. Treatment capacity is 10 MGD and brings the system total to 30 MGD. Pumping capacity increased 1 MGD, which brings the total system capacity to 43 MGD. Storage Facilities the plants is reported to be about 27.5 MGD. Peak demand reached an all time high of 19.2 MGD during summer 1999. The water treatment plants have three primary processes: Reduction of high iron content Reduction of water hardness Reduction of the bacteria count These are achieved through the feeding of lime, zinc polyphosphate, chlorine, fluorides, and a polymer into the water. Basically, the plant cycles consist of aeration, chemical mixing, flocculation, primary and secondary clarification, filtration, and chlorination. and Transmission Lines As of May 2005 OMU had 4,854,940 inch-foot of transmission lines (8 and larger) and 6,486,417 inch-foot of distribution lines (6 and less). There are a total of 279.4 miles of main. Since May 1986 the total inch-foot of transmission lines has grown at a faster rate than the total inch-foot distribution lines. Transmission lines now represent nearly 43% of the system s capacity compared to nearly 37% in 1986. The following exhibit documents these trends. Exhibit 665-T1: OMU Mains May 1986 June 2005 Transmission Total As of Inch-foot Inch-foot In-ft 5/31 (000) (000) (000) % Trans. 1986 3485 6028 9513 36.63 1990 3601 6057 9658 37.29 1995 4233 6114 10347 40.91 1999 4519 6204 10723 42.14 2005 4855 6486 11341 42.80 Source: OMU Water Department PRESSURES AND FIRE FLOW RATES The type, character, and structural conditions of each of the districts that are served by the water distribution system largely determine pressure and fire-flow requirements. Kentucky Division of Water requires 30 psi at all times. The average pressure throughout the OMU system averages 58 psi. Pumping facilities at the treatment plants develop a pressure of approximately 80 psi. However, as the water travels throughout the distribution system, some of this pressure is lost. Generally, these pressure ratings are adequate for fire protection needs Storage facilities in 1987 consisted of one underground reservoir (clear well) with a capacity of four million gallons (see Exhibit 665-M1 for exact location), and four elevated storage tanks with holding capacities of one to two million gallons each. With the addition of the Cavin Plant, an additional 5.2 million-gallon storage facility has been added to the inventory. It is similar to the clear well and requires pumping. Treatment Facilities Water Treatment Plants The annual average daily demand for 2005 was 13.2 MGD. The treatment plants rated capacities total 30 MGD based on a filtration rate of 5-gpm/sq.ft. The maximum hydraulic capacity of

666 666 Exhibit 666-M1: Water Districts in Daviess County

667 667 Fire Hydrants Required fire flow rates vary from about 250 gallons per minute (GPM) for sparsely developed residential areas consisting of small, one-story structures to about 6,000 GPM for densely developed districts. Fire hydrant spacing was found to be very wide in some of the declining residential areas of the Owensboro in the 1965 plan. Since then, Chapter Six of the Owensboro Metropolitan Subdivision Regulations - Public Improvement Specifications was adopted. Specifications require placement of hydrants in new residential subdivisions involving new streets to be placed no further apart than 600 feet. In major subdivisions on existing county roads, hydrants may be placed up to 1,000 feet apart. Refer to Chapter Six of the Public Improvements Specifications for further information. Furthermore, OMU started a fire hydrant change-out program in 1998, which will eventually replace 180 outdated hydrants with new hydrants that have auxiliary valves. The auxiliary valve allows for turn-off during an emergency. outside the corporate limits. The distribution system consists of pipes from two to six inches in diameter. While current subdivision regulations require minimum spacing and flows for fire hydrants, hydrants that meet spacing standards along major arterial roadways consisting of four or more lanes may still be difficult to use to serve newly created lots located on the opposite side of the street. Street traffic would need to be stopped in order to lay line across the roadway which could result in major impacts on the area. One approach to deal with this difficulty would be to institute additional requirements for fire hydrant spacing when located along a major arterial roadway with multiple lanes in order to assure that fire protection is provided on either side of the roadway. RECOMMENDATIONS The following improvements need to be made to the existing water supply system: Replacement of deficient mains (less than 6'') and out dated hydrants. Looping of dead end mains as opportunities present themselves. Install wells as needed THE FUTURE A 1995 Master Plan by Black and Veatch Engineers-Architects is utilized by OMU to determine system improvements. The 1995 Plan was updated by Burge Waggoner, Sumner & Cannon in 2003. These comprehensive studies should be referred to for additional information. WHITESVILLE'S WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM System and Service Area Whitesville began purchasing its water from the Southeast Daviess County Water District in 1978 and ceased operation of its well field. The pump station for the system is located on KY 54 near its intersection with Jack Hinton Road on the eastern side of Philpot. An 8-inch transmission main delivers water to a 110,000-gallon ground storage tank near the western edge of the City. A second storage tank with a capacity of 340,000 gallons has been added to the system. Customers have increased from 775 in 1987 to 1,300 in July 2006. Most of this growth has been