European Position Determination System. Guideline for EUPOS Reference Frame Fixing



Similar documents
European Geodetic Status European Geodetic Reference Systems

Status and Development of the European Height Systems

European Petroleum Survey Group EPSG. Guidance Note Number 10. April Geodetic Transformations Offshore Norway

European Position Determination System. Guidelines For Cross- Border Data Exchange

Surveying & Positioning Guidance note 10

Real-Time GNSS in Routine EPN Operations Concept

GNSS re-processing results at GOP and the latest updates of ITRS/ETRS. Jan Douša

Online Precise Point Positioning Using the. Natural Resources Canada Canadian Spatial Reference System (CSRS-PPP)

The Status and Development of the APREF GNSS Network Guorong Hu

THE FINNISH COORDINATE REFERENCE SYSTEMS

Trimble CenterPoint RTX Post-Processing Services FAQs

Congreso Internacional Geomática Andina y 5 de junio, Bogotá, D. C., Colombia

Maintenance and Densification of the Italian GNSS Network. DIPARTIMENTO DI GEOSCIENZE A. Caporali J. Zurutuza M. Bertocco R. Corso P.

Summary of the determination and analysis of the ETRS89 coordinates for the GNSS Reference Station Network

North American Horizontal Datums. Jan Van Sickle

Opus Projects A Web-Based Application to Administer and Process Multi- Day GPS Campaign Data

The Use and Integrity Monitoring of IGS Products at Geoscience Australia (GA)

Perspective of Permanent Reference Network KOPOS in Kosova

Evolving a new Geodetic Positioning Framework: An Australian Perspective

Prof. Ludovico Biagi. Satellite Navigation and Monitoring

GPS Precise Point Positioning as a Method to Evaluate Global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model

Why do we need to improve co-locations of space geodetic techniques?

International Global Navigation Satellite Systems Service

Non-parametric estimation of seasonal variations in GNSS-derived time series

Scheduling of VLBI observations to satellites with the Vienna VLBI Software (VieVS)

Geomatics Guidance Note 3

The Chief Directorate: National

GPS Precise Point Positioning with a Difference*

The IGS: A Multi-GNSS Service

WHAT YOU NEED TO USE THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEMS

A New Map of UK Vertical Land Movements based on Continuous GPS and Absolute Gravity

Towards the Realization of Geo-Referencing Infrastructure for Dynamic Japan (GRID-Japan) Hiromichi TSUJI and Kazuo KOMAKI

Maintaining High Accuracy in Modern Geospatial Data

SKPOS ( EUPOS ) network solution monitoring application

Pacific Sea Level Monitoring Project

Günter Seeber. Satellite Geodesy 2nd completely revised and extended edition

EPN Time Series Analysis:

GNSS and Heighting, Practical Considerations. A Parker National Geo-spatial Information Department of Rural Development and Land Reform

Alfons-Goppel-Str. 11, D München

EPN Special Project Real-Time Analysis Status Report

Korea Geodetic Framework for Sustainable Development*

LOCAL CORS Network Scene

Absolute GNSS Antenna Calibration with a Robot: Repeatability, GLONASS and Carrier-to-Noise Pattern

Norwegian Hydrographic Service. and. [Contractor] APPENDIX B. Technical Specifications. MAREANO Programme. [Date]

Online GPS processing services: an initial study

GGOS Bureau for Networks and Commuications Michael Pearlman Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Cambridge MA USA

AFREF First GNSS Station : Lessons learnt Building up a Continental Reference Frame

Recent Activities of the SGO Local Analysis Centre

NTRIP-based DGPS service in Hungary

GNSS-PW Progress Session 5: Other GRUAN products

THE NEED TO IMPLEMENT CONSTRUCTION DEFORMATION SPATIAL MONITORING SYSTEMS IN ROMANIA

PLOTTING SURVEYING DATA IN GOOGLE EARTH

The Applanix SmartBase TM Software for Improved Robustness, Accuracy, and Productivity of Mobile Mapping and Positioning

Recent Advances in Pixel Localization Accuracy

Lecture 2. Map Projections and GIS Coordinate Systems. Tomislav Sapic GIS Technologist Faculty of Natural Resources Management Lakehead University

Case Study Australia. Dr John Dawson A/g Branch Head Geodesy and Seismic Monitoring Geoscience Australia. Chair UN-GGIM-AP WG1 Chair APREF.

Digital Cadastral Maps in Land Information Systems

GNSS satellites as co-locations for a combined GNSS and SLR analysis

Global Positioning System

Satellite Posi+oning. Lecture 5: Satellite Orbits. Jan Johansson Chalmers University of Technology, 2013

Polish Spatial Data Infrastructure - from the Concept towards its Implementation

Development of new hybrid geoid model for Japan, GSIGEO2011. Basara MIYAHARA, Tokuro KODAMA, Yuki KUROISHI

Deformation Monitoring and Analysis Using Regional GPS Permanent Tracking Station Networks

Enabling RTK-like positioning offshore using the global VERIPOS GNSS network. Pieter Toor GNSS Technology Manager

RealtimePPP using EUREF and IGS Networks

SURVEYING WITH GPS. GPS has become a standard surveying technique in most surveying practices

Analysis of RTN Measurement Results Referring to ASG-EUPOS Network

EUREF2013 SYMPOSIUM 29 MAY 01 JUNE 2013 BUDAPEST SCIENTIFIC AND SOCIAL PROGRAMMES

The Map Grid of Australia 1994 A Simplified Computational Manual

Towards Real-time GNSS Troposphere Delay Monitoring Service for Poland

The new ISO standard for checking GNSS field measuring systems

Railway Track Deformation Surveying Using GNSS Real and Virtual Reference

Local monitoring by low cost devices and free and open sources softwares

SWEPOS and its GNSS-Based Positioning Services

A guide to coordinate systems in Great Britain

RELEASE NOTES. Trimble. SPS Series Receivers. Introduction. New features and changes

Survey Ties Guidelines

On May 27, 2010, the U.S. Air. Satellite. Antenna Phase Center and Attitude Modeling

SATELLITE TIME-TRANSFER: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND PROJECTS

IDS Data Flow Coordination (2009)

Preliminary Study of Modeling the Precipitable Water Vapor Based on Radiosonde Data

DEVELOPING A MULTI-GNSS ANALYSIS SOFTWARE FOR SCIENTIFIC PURPOSES

GPS LOCATIONS FOR GIS: GETTING THEM RIGHT THE FIRST TIME

Transcription:

European Position Determination System Guideline for EUPOS Reference Frame Fixing Version 1.0 21 September 2007

Copyright: Publisher: 2007 by the International EUPOS Steering Committee Office of the International EUPOS Steering Committee c/o Senate Department for Urban Development III B Fehrbelliner Platz 1 D - 10707 Berlin, Germany

Content 1. Preamble...4 2. ETRS89 realization...4 3. ETRS89 implementation in EUPOS...5 3.1 Using EPN...5 References...6

1. Preamble The IAG Subcommission for the European Reference Frame (EUREF), following its resolution No. 1 of the Firenze 1990 meeting, recommends that the terrestrial reference system to be adopted by EUREF is coincident with ITRS at the epoch of 1989.0 and fixed to the stable part of the Eurasian plate. It is named European Terrestrial Reference System 89 (ETRS89). In 2003 the European Commission accepted the ETRS89 as an obligatory reference system for referencing spatial information for all applications done in EU s interests. The ellipsoidal coordinates related to ETRS89 represent an obligatory system of geographical coordinates. The EuroGeographics, which is an association representing European Mapping and Cadastral Agencies of 42 European countries, has been developing its main projects, like ESDI (European Spatial Data Infrastructure), on the basis of ETRS89. Therefore, ETRS89 should be underlying to the EUPOS GNSS positioning system currently developed in Central and Eastern Europe. 2. ETRS89 realization The ETRS89 is maintained by the IAG Subcommission EUREF and is accessed through the EUREF Permanent Network (EPN), a science-driven network of continuously operating GNSS reference stations with precisely known coordinates in ETRS89 see e.g. http://www.epncb.oma.be/. The EPN represents the ETRS89 first-order realization on international (continental) level. On national level the ETRS89 has been realized by a stepwise densification and improvement of the original EUREF reference frame carried out by individual European countries making full use of existing operational EPN stations. At present (March 2007) the EPN consists of about 200 operational tracking stations. In the years 1989 2002 EUREF densification observation campaigns were carried out in almost all European countries, in some of them repeatedly. These campaigns, along with EPN stations, constitute national ETRS89 realizations. The realization of a system is called reference frame, which is represented by a number of markers on the earth surface, with known coordinates and (sometimes) velocities. Like each system, ETRS89 has been evolving in time and each evolution stage is represented by a corresponding realization. The most recent realization is always an improvement with respect to the previous one. The reliability of the EPN site coordinates depends on the length of its operation and on the possibility to link the GPS-based coordinates to the coordinates determined by other space observation techniques. EPN coordinates are available in two reference systems ITRS and ETRS89. With respect to the history of observations and processing three types of EPN site coordinates can be distinguished: (1) weekly coordinates, computed by the EPN combination centre, (2) site coordinates and velocities computed within the EPN project Time series monitoring and (3) official coordinates and velocities issued by the IERS as a result of a combination of the multi-year coordinate solutions obtained by several space geodetic techniques. Coordinates (1) are not suitable for reference frame definition, this is only for rough coordinate monitoring. Coordinates (2) are the most up-to-date and most accurate crd and vel. solution for the EPN stations.they are useful when a permanent station is running for years but not yet included into the latest ITRF solution (between 2 consecutive ITRF realizations). If a non-itrf EPN station have 1-2 years observation history the quality of its crd solution is equivalent or comparable to the ITRF (the velocity needs longer observation set). They fully rely on (1). Coordinates (3) are official coordinates/velocities issued by IERS,. Recommended usage:

If the spacing of EPN stations is less then 300 km and if no coordinate discontinuity appears, use (3), If (3) not available, use (2) especially when you want to involve as much permanent stations as possible, If (3) or (2) not available, use (1). 3. ETRS89 implementation in EUPOS The ETRS89 coordinates of EUPOS stations should be basically determined following the guidelines agreed by the TWG EUREF, see Gurtner et al., 1996 and Boucher and Altamimi, 2007 (see also Annex Memo: Specifications for reference frame fixing in the analysis of a EUREF GPS campaign, issued March 27, 2007). The goal is to process the observation data in ETRS89 taking full benefit of the most recent realization of the reference frame represented by fiducial stations and of the final IGS orbits. It is recommended the EUPOS coordinates should be related exclusively to the reference frame represented by the EPN and should represent the national ETRS89 realization. The EUPOS member countries are encouraged not to accommodate the EUPOS coordinates to the the old national realizations, but to recompute the national realization to most recent realization of the ETRS89. using EPN. The aim of this approach is to ensure: - nationwide consistency of the passive and active networks, - consistent reference system realization between EUPOS countries (important for crossborder networking). 3.1 Using EPN The ETRS89 coordinates of EUPOS reference stations should be determined following the EUREF specifications and relevant EUREF TWG guidelines. Use high precision GNSS data processing software like Bernese, GIPSY-OASIS, Geodyn, Geonap, etc. Select properly several EPN stations distributed inside and outside the corresponding national EUPOS segment Avoid EPN stations with the history shorter than 1 year, check their observation time series visiting http://epncb.oma.be/_dataproducts/products/index.php, avoid stations with unexplained trends and periodicities, prefere IGS stations if any Define a campaign lasting at least 3 4 weeks, operating the EUPOS stations simultaneously with the EPN stations Process the campaign, generate a loosely constrained SINEX solution Regularize the solution fixing the ITRF-YY coordinates of EPN stations Convert the results into ETRS89 at tc following the formulas and numerical values of parameters given in Boucher and Altamimi, 2007 (see Annex) In the processing of the corresponding GNSS observation campaigns antennas phase centre variations from individual phase center calibrations should be used if they exist. Using this approach a consistency with the actual ETRS89 realization on the level of 1 mm horizontally and 3 mm vertically can be achieved for the defined observation period.

References Gurtner W., C. Boucher, C. Bruyninx, H. v.d. Marel: The Use of the IGS/EUREF Permanent Network for EUREF Densification Campaigns. In: Report on the Symposium of the IAG Subcommission for Europe (EUREF) held in Sofia, 4-7 June 1997. Veroeff. D. Bayer Komm. Fuer die Internat. Erdmessung d. Bayer. Akad. D. Wissenschaften, Heft. Nr. 58, Muenchen 1997, pp. 50 51. Boucher C., Z Altamimi: Memo: Specifications for reference frame fixing in the analysis of a EUREF GPS campaign. Issue March 27, 2007, see http://lareg.ensg.ign.fr/euref/