Rounding and Significant Figures



Similar documents
Determination of Insoluble Solids in Pretreated Biomass March 2008 Material

Determination of Extractives in Biomass

Optical Blade Position Tracking System Test

Elastomer Compatibility Testing of Renewable Diesel Fuels

ASSURING THE QUALITY OF TEST RESULTS

Evaluating Laboratory Data. Tom Frick Environmental Assessment Section Bureau of Laboratories

How to Verify Performance Specifications

A New Empirical Relationship between Thrust Coefficient and Induction Factor for the Turbulent Windmill State

Regional Field Verification Operational Results from Four Small Wind Turbines in the Pacific Northwest

Ecology Quality Assurance Glossary

Data Quality. Tips for getting it, keeping it, proving it! Central Coast Ambient Monitoring Program

AGREEMENT BETWEEN USER AND Caduceon Environmental Laboratories Customer Portal

Third Party Software Used In PLEK500 (Utility for Win) v1.x.xx.xxx

RSA Two Factor Authentication

1 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Project Plan

Amorphous Transparent Conducting Oxides (TCOs) Deposited at T 100 C

Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) in the Residential Section: An Analysis of Installed Rooftop Prices

Small PV Systems Performance Evaluation at NREL's Outdoor Test Facility Using the PVUSA Power Rating Method

Microsoft SharePoint

GEO Sticky DNS. GEO Sticky DNS. Feature Description

This technical note discusses the different reports you can generate as well as the use of each report in reconciling bank accounts.

APPENDIX N. Data Validation Using Data Descriptors

Adobe DNG Flat Field Plug-in (1.0) Software Notices and/or Additional Terms and Conditions

USP Certificate PREDNISONE TABLETS. USP Catalog No.: USP Lot No.: R031Y0 (10 mg nominal prednisone content per tablet)

Presentation Title. Multiwell Automated Chemical Optimization Solution Presenter: Tom Dean, VP of Automation. Gas Well Deliquification Workshop

Early Fuel Cell Market Deployments: ARRA and Combined (IAA, DLA, ARRA)

Market Data Analysis - Pacific Life

What are cookies and how does Glendale Career College use them?

System Center Virtual Machine Manager 2012 R2 Plug-In. Feature Description

Procedure for Writing Technical Procedures

Kaiser Permanente Affiliate Link Provider Web Site Application

CALIBRATION PRINCIPLES

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication. KEMP LoadMaster and Azure Multi- Factor Authentication. Technical Note

Host OS Compatibility Guide

Port Following. Port Following. Feature Description

Validation and Calibration. Definitions and Terminology

Technical Note: Setting Up Authorized Reference GL Account IDs for Use when Posting AP Invoices

HIH-4000 Series Humidity Sensors

Universal Terms of Service Agreement Moodle Clients

QUALITY ASSURANCE / QUALITY CONTROL POLICY BREG SOIL AND WATER QUALITY LABORATORY UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE

Determining Measurement Uncertainty for Dimensional Measurements

HyDIVE (Hydrogen Dynamic Infrastructure and Vehicle Evolution) model analysis. Cory Welch. Hydrogen Analysis Workshop, August 9-10 Washington, D.C.

Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC)

CCP Recruitment 2015 Salary Survey

Balance Accuracy. FlexiWeigh

Terms & Conditions Template

Rating Action: Moody's assigns A2 to Los Angeles County Capital Asset Leasing Corporation CA's equipment lease revenue bonds

Data Quality Objectives and Quality Assurance Project

Article # 1269 DESCRIPTION SOLUTION. Technical Note: Sample Positive Pay Output File Format. Difficulty Level: Beginner Level AccountMate User

M E M O R A N D U M. Philadelphia Board of Trade Members and Member Organizations

Sample Analysis Design Step 2 Calibration/Standard Preparation Choice of calibration method dependent upon several factors:

The Credit Control, LLC Web Site is comprised of various Web pages operated by Credit Control, LLC.

Zander Identity Theft Solutions Benefits Summary and Terms of Service

Determination of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Volatile Solids (TVS) in Waters of Fresh/Estuarine/Coastal Waters

Figure 1. A typical Laboratory Thermometer graduated in C.

Standard Operating Procedure for the Determination of Total and Total Dissolved Solids CCAL 13A.2

Log Insight Manager. Deployment Guide

Method to Calculate Uncertainties in Measuring Shortwave Solar Irradiance Using Thermopile and Semiconductor Solar Radiometers

Self Help Guides. Setup Exchange with Outlook

Banking Industry Architecture Network

Case Study Food Manufacturing Company

How to Deploy Models using Statistica SVB Nodes

formerly Help Desk Authority Quest Free Network Tools User Manual

Online Banking Agreement and Disclosures

Applying Statistics Recommended by Regulatory Documents

Canadian Market-Linked GIC

Mobile Deposit Disclosure

QUALITY ASSURANCE and QUALITY CONTROL DATA STANDARD

METHOD 9075 TEST METHOD FOR TOTAL CHLORINE IN NEW AND USED PETROLEUM PRODUCTS BY X-RAY FLUORESCENCE SPECTROMETRY (XRF)

All copyright, trade mark, design rights, patent and other intellectual property rights (registered or unregistered) in the Content belongs to us.

Please read these Terms and Conditions carefully. They Govern your access and use of our Website and services on it.

SSA-312. ISA Security Compliance Institute System Security Assurance Security development artifacts for systems

Purpose: TechTip: Using Windows Task Scheduler to monitor if WindowViewer is Running

THE STATISTICAL TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL DATA 1

SDN Adaptive Load Balancing. Feature Description

Wireless Subwoofer TI Design Tests

Secure SCADA Communication Protocol Performance Test Results

EPA NATIONAL LEAD LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM. LABORATORY QUALITY SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS (LQSR) REVISION 3.0 (November 05, 2007)

Terms and Conditions

Supply Chain Management Use Case Model

Covered California. Terms and Conditions of Use

Promotion Model. CVS SUITE QUICK GUIDE 2009 Build 3701 February March Hare Software Ltd

Software Hosting and End-User License Subscription Agreement

LAB ID and/or LABORATORY NAME: ASSESSOR NAME: CONTINUOUS RADON MONITOR (CRM) by Proportional Counting. Method Number: ELAP method code 7037

Transcription:

National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future A national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Rounding and Significant Figures Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) Issue Date: 07/17/2005 Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42626 January 2008 B. Michener, C. Scarlata, and B. Hames NREL is operated by Midwest Research Institute Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337

Rounding and Significant Figures Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP) Issue Date: 07/17/2005 Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42626 January 2008 B. Michener, C. Scarlata, and B. Hames National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337

DISCLAIMER These Standard Biomass Analytical Methods ( Methods ) are provided by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory ( NREL ), which is operated by the Midwest Research Institute ( MRI ) for the Department Of Energy. Access to and use of these Methods shall impose the following obligations on the user. The user is granted the right, without any fee or cost, to use, copy, modify, alter, enhance and distribute these Methods for any purpose whatsoever, except commercial sales, provided that this entire notice appears in all copies of the Methods. Further, the user agrees to credit NREL/MRI in any publications that result from the use of these Methods. The names NREL/MRI, however, may not be used in any advertising or publicity to endorse or promote any products or commercial entity unless specific written permission is obtained from NREL/MRI. The user also understands that NREL/MRI is not obligated to provide the user with any support, consulting, training or assistance of any kind with regard to the use of these Methods or to provide the user with any updates, revisions or new versions. THESE METHODS ARE PROVIDED BY NREL/MRI "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL NREL/MRI BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CLAIMS ASSOCIATED WITH THE LOSS OF DATA OR PROFITS, WHICH MAY RESULT FROM AN ACTION IN CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS CLAIM THAT ARISES OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACCESS, USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THESE METHODS.

Procedure Title: Rounding and Significant Figures Laboratory Analytical Procedure 1. Introduction 1.1 This procedure describes the rules for rounding numbers for the reporting of analytical data. 2. Scope 2.1 This method describes the application of significant figures for the proper reporting of analytical data 3. Terminology 3.1 Significant Figures: The number of significant figures in a measured quantity is the number of digits that are known accurately, plus one that is in doubt. Zeroes that appear to the left of the first nonzero digit are placeholders and are not considered significant. Zeros located to the right of the first digit may be considered significant. 3.2 Analytical Data: Data that represent the measured concentration or value of analytes in a sample aliquot. Sample aliquots include samples, method blanks, calibration verification standard (CVS) and quality assurance samples (QA samples, e.g. NIST standards). 3.3 Sample Data. Data that represents the measured concentration of analytes in a sample. 3.4 Method Blank Data: Data that represent the measured concentration of analytes measured in a all reagents without the addition of a sample. 3.5 Quality control (QC) Data: Data that represent the measured concentration of target analytes that are elements of QA and CVS samples. 3.6 Quality Assurance Data: Data the represent the known values in a standard refernce material 3.6 Accuracy Data: Data that represent the percent recovery determined from QC data. 3.7 Precision Data: Data that represent the relative percent difference or relative standard deviation calculated from accuracy data. 3.8 Calibration Range: The range of a method is defined as the lower and upper concentrations for which the analytical method has adequate accuracy, precision and linearity. 4. Significance and Use 4.1 It is the responsibility of each analyst recording analytical data to comply with each of these rules for significant figures and rounding. 4.2 It is the responsibility of each supervisor, data reviewer, or QA representative to ensure that these rules are properly applied in the treatment of analytical data. 5. Interferences 5.1 Not applicable 1

6. Apparatus 6.1 Not applicable 7. Reagents and materials 7.1 Not applicable 8. ES&H Considerations and Hazards 8.1 Not applicable 9. Procedure 9.1 All calculations should be completed prior to any rounding to avoid introducing additional error into the analytical result. 9.2 Data entry into calculators or computers should include all of the available digits from the analytical instrument generating the data. Some instrument outputs contain an excessive numbers of digits. In these cases data entry should be at least 5 digits (if available) to prevent error due to successive rounding. 9.3 The calibration range must be reported using the same rounding and significant figures rules as the associated sample data. 9.4 Data below the calibration range prior to rounding should be reported as <(the lower end of the calibration range). Example: If your calibration range is 500-100 ppm, and your instrument reports a value below 100 ppm, the data should be reported as <100 ppm.] 9.5 Results from the measurement of Method Blank samples results should be treated as analytical data and reported with the same number of significant figures as the associated sample data. 10. Rounding Rules 10.1 When the digit following the last the last significant digit is less than 5, the number remains unchanged (round down.) Example: 1.63 is rounded to 1.6 10.2 When the digit following the last the last significant digit is greater than 5, the digit to be retained is increased by 1. Example: 2.6 is rounded to 2.7 10.3 When the digit following the last the last significant digit equals 5, the number is rounded off to the nearest even number. Example: 3.85 is rounded to 3.8, 4.55 is rounded to 4.6 Note: Some automated systems such as spreadsheets, calculators and data management software always round up a five. 10.4 When calculations are complete and two or more figures are to the right of the last the last significant digit, rounding begins at the least certain digit and continues until the correct number of digits remains. Example: Rounding to two significant figures: 2.4501 is viewed as 2.4(501) and is rounded to 2.5 2.5499 is viewed as 2.5(499) and is rounded to 2.5 2

10.1 Significant Figures 10.1.1 The rounding rules described in Section 10 must be used to report data to the proper number of significant figures. This section describes how to determine the proper number of significant figures. 10.1.2 The number of significant figures in a measured quantity is the number of digits that are known accurately, plus one that is in doubt. Zeroes that appear to the left of the first nonzero digit are placeholders and are not considered significant. Zeros located to the right of the first digit may be considered significant. The concept of significant digits applies only to measured quantities and to results calculated from measured quantities. It is never applied to exact numbers or definitions. Example: 15.8sec 60sec/ min= 0.263min the answer has three significant figures because the conversion factor is a definition. 10.1.3 A final result should never contain any more significant digits than the least precise data used to calculate it. 11. Calculations 11.1 To report or calculate the relative percent difference (RPD) between two samples, use the following calculation Where: (X 1 2 RPD = X ) 100 X mean X 1 and X 2 = measured values X mean = the mean of X 1 and X 2 11.2 To report or calculate the root mean square deviation (RMS deviation) or the standard deviation (std. dev.) of the samples, use the following calculations. First find the root mean square (RMS), of the sample using RMS = x m = mean = n 1 2 x n Then find the root mean square deviation, or standard deviation, using RMSdeviation = σ = stdev = n 1 ( ) 2 x i x m n 3

Where: x m =the root mean square of all x values in the set n=number of samples in set x i =a measured value from the set 12. Report Format 12.1 Not applicable 13. Precision and Bias 13.1 Not applicable 14. Quality Control 14.1 Not applicable 15. Appendices 15.1 Not applicable 16. References 16.1 The Chemical Technicians Ready Reference Handbook, 4 th Ed., Gershon J. Shugar and Jack T. Ballinger, 1996, New York, New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc. 4