IEPR Lead Commissioner Workshop Electricity Infrastructure Issues in California

Similar documents
How to Achieve improvements in GHG Regulation

EMISSIONS INVENTORY FORECASTING IN CALIFORNIA International Emissions Inventory Conference San Diego, California April 15, 2015

QUESTIONS AND RESPONSES FROM JULY 21, 2011 TECHNOLOGY ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM WORKSHOP

IMPACTS OF SHORT TERM, INTERBASIN, AND INTERPOLLUTANT CREDIT TRADING ON AIR QUALITY AND CREDIT PRICES

California Energy Commission California Perspective on Biofuels and Energy

California Energy Commission 2015 Accomplishments

Proposed Mobil Source Offset Provisions in California May Negatively Impact Air Quality

For general questions, contact:

South Coast Air Quality Management District

Residential and Commercial Energy

Water and Natural Resource Management Issues in California

Air Quality and Some Innovative Ways to Improve It. James W. Yarbrough U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Dallas, Texas

State Planning Agency, Tribal Utilities & Renewable Energy Regime in California

Threshold Determination: California Case Law

CAP AND TRADE PROGRAM DESIGN OPTIONS REPORT OF THE CAP AND TRADE SUBGROUP FINAL REPORT OF THE CLIMATE ACTION TEAM PREPARED BY: CAP AND TRADE SUBGROUP

BOARD MEETING DATE: February 7, 2014 AGENDA NO. 10

Managing Electrical Demand through Difficult Periods: California s Experience with Demand Response

BOARD MEETING DATE: October 2, 2015 AGENDA NO. 9

Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project (TRTP)

How To Reduce Energy Use

Air Quality in San Diego 2013 Annual Report

Delivering Clean Energy

Technology Implementation at the Port of Los Angeles Moving from Current to Emerging Technologies

Distributed PV the road California is already on. Public Interest Environmental Law Conference Bill Powers, P.E., Powers Engineering March 5, 2011

Air Quality. DavidPinoPhotography / Shutterstock.com. Air Quality

California s Electricity Market. Overview

DECISION AUTHORIZING LONG-TERM PROCUREMENT FOR LOCAL CAPACITY REQUIREMENTS

Natural Gas End-use Report

Orange. County. Reclamation Plant No. 1 Treatment Plant No. 2. La Habra Brea. Fullerton Placentia Anaheim Villa Park Alamitos.

Appendix F. DRECP Energy Development Assumptions and the BLM LUPA

City Council Briefing. June 16, 2010

Safety Measurement and Cleaning Fuels Fund

2014 EIA Energy Conference. Edward Randolph Director, Energy Division California Public Utilities Commission

GUIDANCE ON STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP) CREDITS FOR EMISSION REDUCTIONS FROM ELECTRIC-SECTOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES

CHAPTER 4 REGIONAL MODELING AND EVALUATION

The Regulatory Role of Chemical Mechanisms and Future Needs

Jan McFarland Executive Director CA Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority

Demand-Side Management Resulting in Emissions Reductions and SIP Credit

Collaborations that Work: Making the San Diego Region a Leader in Solar Energy

AB 2145: The Monopoly Protection Bill

Cleaner Air with Electricity Infrastructure Renewal

Moving Toward A Low Carbon Future: A Policy Perspective

California s Energy Future

California s Industrial Energy Efficiency Best Practices Technical Outreach and Training Program

Renewable Energy Credit (REC) Price Forecast (Preliminary Results)

Emilio Camacho, Esq.

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS M. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 5. NATURAL GAS

CHAPTER 4 ALTERNATIVES COMPARISON

Forecast of Future Electricity Costs in California. Prepared by: Strategic Resource Advisers, LLC November 12, 2014

Oil and Gas Air Quality Regulations and Permitting

Investigating a Higher Renewables Portfolio Standard in California

White Paper. Understanding California s Electricity Prices

Clean Power Plan: MISO Analysis ADEQ/APSC Stakeholder Meeting

Value of Distributed Generation

ERCOT Analysis of the Impacts of the Clean Power Plan Final Rule Update

Senior Director. Jim Arwood

Proposed Rates Mandates & Reliability

Austin Energy Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan to 2025: An Update of the 2020 Plan

Value of Distributed Generation

Research and Development: Advancing Solar Energy in California

Renewable Choice Energy

FYI: Natural Gas Issues in California. April 2001

Clean Energy Jobs Plan

Southern California Edison s

E N G I N E E R I N G

MOUNTAIN HOUSE MASTER PLAN CHAPTER TEN AIR QUALITY AND TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT

Figure 11.1 Changes in California Gross State Product versus Changes in U.S. Gross Domestic Product, California U.S.

BOARD MEETING DATE: February 7, 2014 AGENDA NO. 12

Sustainable and Renewable Energy Development Authority (SREDA) of Bangladesh Role and Responsibility

March 31, Environmental Management Commission Attention: Renewable Energy Scoping Process 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC

Allan E. Seward Engineering Geology, Inc. Engineering Geology and Geotechnical Review. May 15, 2007.

Modeling Transportation-Related Emissions Using GIS

Voluntary Markets: Lay of the Land

SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT LABORATORY APPROVAL PROGRAM

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Board of Education Report

PG&E and Renewables. Finding the ROI in Green Programs. Andrew Yip Manager Solar and Customer Generation Integrated Demand-Side Management

ARB s Diesel Emissions Programs

Clean Up Your Fleet. Introducing a practical approach to cleaner, more efficient fleet operation

FAC 7.1: Generators. EPA Impacts on Emergency Gensets for 2015 Installations

Texas Electricity Basics

FACT SHEET PROPOSED REVISIONS TO THE NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS FOR SULFUR DIOXIDE

Technical Support Document

Report to the Legislative Assembly

INVESTING IN A CLEAN FUTURE. Austin Energy s Resource, Generation and Climate Protection Plan to 2020 Update

Is there evidence for acute air pollution deaths in Southern California? S. Stanley Young. Steve Milloy

NORTH TEXAS AIR QUALITY 101: OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY

2010 NOV 30 P MQ. November 29,2010

POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF A STRICTER OZONE STANDARD

Selling Residential Solar A Market Based Approach

Regulation No. 34. Emission Banking and Trading Program

Evaluating Ozone Control Programs in the Eastern United States: Focus on the NOx Budget Trading Program, 2004

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY 2013 ANNUAL REPORT

SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE BERTHS [CHINA SHIPPING] CONTAINER TERMINAL PROJECT

MARKETING AGENCY RFP: CREATIVE PITCH BRIEF

Rick D. Longobart. City of Santa Ana

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Emissions Banking and Trading Programs. Office of Air Air Quality Division

Energy Efficiency and Alternative Energy Programs

Costs for Traditional Air Pollutants

Transforming America s Energy Future. Kentucky. Energy Statistics. Developed by

Shasta County Department of Resource Management Air Quality Management District Carl Moyer Heavy-Duty Low Emission Vehicle Incentive Program

Transcription:

IEPR Lead Commissioner Workshop Electricity Infrastructure Issues in California South Coast AQMD Air Quality-Related Energy Policy Affecting Electricity Infrastructure Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer Los Angeles June 22, 2012 1

South Coast Air Quality Management District Local air pollution control agency in Southern California (non-desert portions of LA, Riverside & San Bernardino counties and all of Orange county) Population of 17 million (about half of State s population) Worst air quality in the nation (Ozone & PM 2.5) Receives and processes about 10,000 permit applications annually Regulates over 27,000 stationary sources 2

Ozone Exposures* 8-Hour NAAQS = 75 ppb Nationwide California Sacramento Valley 5.6% South Coast 48.1% San Joaquin Valley 10.5% Rest of Nation 9.2% San Diego 5.0% Rest of Calif 3.2% Houston/Galvest on 4.4% Atlanta 1.3% Dallas/Ft Worth 4.1% Philadelphia/Wil mington 3.9% New York/New Jersey Phoenix 3.8% 1.0% South Coast 66.4% * Population-weighted incremental exposure to ozone above the 8-Hour NAAQS (> 75 ppb), based on 2008-2010 design values San Joaquin Valley 14.6% Sacramento Valley 7.7% San Diego 6.9% Rest of California 4.4% 3

PM2.5 Exposure* Annual Average NAAQS = 15 µg/m3 Nationwide California South Coast 43.4% San Joaquin Valley 33.6% New York 3.8% Arizona 3.1% Texas 2.7% Pennsylvani a 5.8% Rest of Nation 7.7% South Coast 56.4% San Joaquin Valley 43.6% * Population-weighted incremental exposure to PM2.5 above the NAAQS annual standard, based on 2007-2009 data 4

Mobile Sources Cause 80% of Remaining Air Pollution in South Coast Off-road Mobile 41% On-road Mobile 39% Other 20% 5

Top NOx Source Categories (2023) (2012 AQMP Draft Inventory) + Draft 2012 AQMP as of May 4, 2012 (preliminary estimates) * Oceangoing vessels = 33.8 tons/day **RECLAIM: 320 largest stationary sources, including all refineries and power plants 6

Nitrogen Oxides Emissions in 2023 with Adopted Standards and Additional Needed Emission Reductions (tons per day) 7 * Source: Ambient ozone modeling conducted by SCAQMD, 2012; data preliminary

SCAB Ozone Attainment Preliminary Basin NOX Reductions Needed Year Federal Standard (PPB) Percent Reduction of NOX Emissions from 2023 Base Year Carrying Capacity (tpd) 2023 80 65 115 2032 75 75 80 8

The Relationship Energy Use Air Quality Health 9

Multiple Issues, Separate Solutions Climate Change Air Quality Energy Mobility Climate Change Air Quality Energy Mobility 10

Integrated Solution Climate Change Global Warming Energy Air Quality Mobility Air Quality Improvement Needs Transportation & Mobility Energy Reliability and Security 11

AQMD Energy-Related Policy: Key elements Zero- and near-zero emission technologies Demand-side management programs (energy efficiency, conservation, load shifting) Distributed renewable generation and energy storage Continued need for fossil fuel plants Community mitigation Public education 12

AQMD Energy-Related Policy: Key actions Feasibility studies of zero- and near-zero emission technologies, costs, impacts Working groups standardized charging installation, rate structure Develop and demonstration of biogas and other clean energy sources from biomass Participate w/ CEC, PUC & partner to promote energy efficiency through local actions Tracking and reporting 13

Regulatory Structure Prior to Electricity Deregulation Public Utilities Commission (PUC) Regulated entire system of Generation, Transmission, Distribution and set energy prices Prices for energy for IOUs (SCE, PG&E and SDG&E) based on cost of running power plants California Energy Commission (CEC) License power plants (> 50 MWs) and perform Needs Analysis Forecast energy needs IOUs provided 77% and Municipalities 23% of power 14

Regulatory Structure After Electricity Deregulation Public Utilities Commission (PUC) Three IOUs divested their generating plants and sold them to five private energy companies (AES/Williams, Dynegy/NRG, Reliant, Duke and Mirant) Continues to regulate retail rates for IOUs, but prices mostly determined by wholesale prices California Energy Commission (CEC) License power plants (> 50 MWs) w/o Needs Analysis Prepares IEPR Utilities sign PPAs with private energy companies Private energy companies provide 42%, IOUs 31% and Municipalities/governments 27% of power 1

Emission Offset Shortage / PM10 ERC Supply & Cost 2000 2012* Supply decreased by 57% since 2000; Cost increased by 2,621% since 2000 Highest price of PM10 ERC (sold in 2009) is $350,000 per lb/day 16

Status of Power Plants in SCAQMD Since Early 2000 Power Plants MW Permitted & in Operation (NG-Fired) 7,745 Permitted Not Operational (NG-Fired) 2,815 Permitted Not Operational (Cogen) 87 Pending Final Permits (Cogen & Solar ) 620 Total Addition 11,267 Shutdowns 4,539 Generating Units Subject to Termination of OTC 7,646 Denied or Cancelled Projects due to lack of Offsets 2,399 17

SCAQMD Staff Observations / Concerns Electricity Deregulation has transferred power generation from a small group of utilities to a small group of energy companies State of California may have inadequate energy planning, (e.g. Huntington Beach Units 3 & 4) Availability and cost of emission offsets are of significant concern that impacts economic growth in SCAQMD 18

Take-away: Clean Energy Future Public investments in energy infrastructure must focus on projects that achieve maximum co-benefits, including: reductions in criteria pollutants, air toxics, and greenhouse gases energy security and energy diversity energy cost certainty, especially for sectors key to SoCal economy 19