Modeling and model identification of a pressurizer at the Paks Nuclear Power Plant



Similar documents
MODELING, SIMULATION AND DESIGN OF CONTROL CIRCUIT FOR FLEXIBLE ENERGY SYSTEM IN MATLAB&SIMULINK

Dynamic Behavior of BWR

Preliminary validation of the APROS 3-D core model of the new Loviisa NPP training simulator

Dynamic Neural Networks for Actuator Fault Diagnosis: Application to the DAMADICS Benchmark Problem

Investigations of a Long-Distance 1000 MW Heat Transport System with APROS Simulation Software

ENERGY TRANSFER SYSTEMS AND THEIR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS

Industrial Steam System Process Control Schemes

Hybrid Modeling and Control of a Power Plant using State Flow Technique with Application

APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS TUTORIAL 1 REVISION OF ISENTROPIC EFFICIENCY ADVANCED STEAM CYCLES

Curriculum Vitae of Gábor Szederkényi

CS 221. Tuesday 8 November 2011

Analysis of Heat Pump Condenser's Performance using the Mathematical Model and a Numerical Method

Evaluation of Bulk Modulus of Oil System with Hydraulic Line

Nonlinear Algebraic Equations Example

The final numerical answer given is correct but the math shown does not give that answer.

Jump Start: Aspen HYSYS Dynamics V7.3

Dynamic Process Modeling. Process Dynamics and Control

Michael Montgomery Marketing Product Manager Rosemount Inc. Russ Evans Manager of Engineering and Design Rosemount Inc.

Enhancing the SNR of the Fiber Optic Rotation Sensor using the LMS Algorithm

The Chilled Water and Hot Water Building Deferential Pressure Setpoint Calculation Chilled Water and Hot Water Pump Speed Control

Pressurized Water Reactor B&W Technology Crosstraining Course Manual. Chapter 9.0. Integrated Control System

HYBRID COMBINED CYCLE POWER PLANT

HEATX :- A Computer Program for Rating and Designing Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers.

Degree programme in Automation Engineering

International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering

Maximum Likelihood Estimation of ADC Parameters from Sine Wave Test Data. László Balogh, Balázs Fodor, Attila Sárhegyi, and István Kollár

Mathematical Modelling and Design of an Advanced Once-Through Heat Recovery Steam Generator

Using Risk Assessment Tool to Evaluate the Fire-Induced Core Damage Frequency

Reinforcement Learning

CHAPTER 1 : INTRODUCTION TO PROCESS CONTROL

Modeling of the process system in a boiling water reactor OLLE PERSSON. SteamSystem. FeedwaterSystem. Master s thesis in Nuclear Engineering

Enhancing Process Control Education with the Control Station Training Simulator

Reinforcement Learning

May 23, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company

Power consumption (kw)

SAMPLE CHAPTERS UNESCO EOLSS PID CONTROL. Araki M. Kyoto University, Japan

Applicazione di tecniche di controllo predittivo multivariabile ad impianti di produzione a Ciclo Combinato

Modeling and Analysis of DC Link Bus Capacitor and Inductor Heating Effect on AC Drives (Part I)

Process Analysis and Control P&ID Handout Page 1 P&ID SYMBOLS. ISA Symbols and Loop Diagrams

Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger

Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of Hammerstein and Wiener Models Using Genetic Algorithms

Optimized Fuzzy Control by Particle Swarm Optimization Technique for Control of CSTR

How To Control A Korean Korean Power Plant

Domain decomposition techniques for interfacial discontinuities

Regency TAFE, SA. An evaluation of the effects of PermaFrost treatment on a Fujitsu Heat Pump. July Prepared by

Wireless Power Transfer System Design. Julius Saitz ANSYS

Concept 2. A. Description of light-matter interaction B. Quantitatities in spectroscopy

CFD software overview comparison, limitations and user interfaces

DERON Air/Water Swimming pool Heat Pump. CY/DY series for Heating/Cooling. Description

Development and testing of a multi-type air conditioner without using AC inverters

Application Note AN-1040

Time Domain and Frequency Domain Techniques For Multi Shaker Time Waveform Replication

THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN MAGNETICS

Simulation of magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) flows: electric potential formulation

7.1 General Events resulting in pressure increase 5

MATLAB AS A PROTOTYPING TOOL FOR HYDRONIC NETWORKS BALANCING

Dynamic Eigenvalues for Scalar Linear Time-Varying Systems

Non Linear Control of a Distributed Solar Field

ORC TURBOGENERATOR TYPE CHP - Organic Rankine Cycle Turbogenerator fed by thermal oil, for the combined production of electric energy and heat -

FREESTUDY HEAT TRANSFER TUTORIAL 3 ADVANCED STUDIES

Terminology and Symbols in Control Engineering

CFD Analysis of a Centrifugal Pump with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide as a Working Fluid

Modelling and Simulation of the Freezing Systems and Heat Pumps Using Unisim Design

MFP14, MFP14S and MFP14SS Automatic Pumps

2B.1 Chilled-Water Return (and Supply) Temperature B.3 Cooling-Water Supply Temperature / Flow

BWR Description Jacopo Buongiorno Associate Professor of Nuclear Science and Engineering

Commercial Semi-Instantaneous Water Heaters

AC : MATHEMATICAL MODELING AND SIMULATION US- ING LABVIEW AND LABVIEW MATHSCRIPT

Accidents of loss of flow for the ETTR-2 reactor: deterministic analysis

TWO-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF FORCED CONVECTION FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER IN A LAMINAR CHANNEL FLOW

Numerical simulation of the utility glass press-andblow

PID Control. Chapter 10

MODELLING COUPLED HEAT AND AIR FLOW: PING-PONG VS ONIONS

Type 3353 Angle Seat Valve

Chemical Process Simulation

ES250: Electrical Science. HW7: Energy Storage Elements

DEMONSTRATION ACCELERATOR DRIVEN COMPLEX FOR EFFECTIVE INCINERATION OF 99 Tc AND 129 I

Bench Autoclave. Standard Operating Procedure. For Installation, Use and Maintenance

MATH 31B: MIDTERM 1 REVIEW. 1. Inverses. yx 3y = 1. x = 1 + 3y y 4( 1) + 32 = 1

Nuclear Energy: Nuclear Energy

V K Raina. Reactor Group, BARC

Ship Propulsion/Electric Power Hybrid System Recovering Waste Heat of Marine Diesel Engine

Annex 6 BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLES FOCUSING ON SAMPLE SIZE AND RELIABILITY CALCULATIONS AND SAMPLING FOR VALIDATION/VERIFICATION. (Version 01.

OVERVIEW. Toolbox for Thermodynamic Modeling and Simulation with MATLAB /Simulink. Key Features:

Content. Professur für Steuerung, Regelung und Systemdynamik. Lecture: Vehicle Dynamics Tutor: T. Wey Date: , 20:11:52

THE development of new methods and circuits for electrical energy conversion

How To Use An Akua Magnetic Lime Scale Preventing Device

The Method of Least Squares. Lectures INF2320 p. 1/80

Dynamic Modeling Of An Ozone Disinfection Facility

NURESAFE EUROPEAN PROJECT Second General Seminar

The Hybrid tri- genera0on system solar- bio- tric

Optimal operation of an Ammonia refrigeration cycle

PID Controller Tuning: A Short Tutorial

Pipe Flow-Friction Factor Calculations with Excel

BEST-ESTIMATE TRANSIENT ANALYSIS WITH SKETCH-INS/TRAC-BF1, ASSESSMENT AGAINST OECD/NEA BWR TURBINE TRIP BENCHMARK ABSTRACT

Skoda Supercritical Steam Turbine 660 MW

- momentum conservation equation ρ = ρf. These are equivalent to four scalar equations with four unknowns: - pressure p - velocity components

Nuclear Design Practices and the Case of Loviisa 3

Transcription:

Modeling and model identification of a pressurizer at the aks Nuclear ower lant István Varga, ábor Szederkényi, Katalin M. Hangos, József Bokor Systems and Control Laboratory Computer and Automation Research Institute Budapest, Hungary SYSID 2006, Newcastle p. /7

ressurizer Engineering model Water energy balance du dt = c pmt I c p mt + K W (T W T) + Wall energy balance 4 i= W HE χ i du W dt Constitutive equations = K W (T T W ) W loss U = c p MT, U W = C pw T W, SYSID 2006, Newcastle p. 8/7

ressurizer State-space model ressure equation p = h(t) = eϕ(t) 00 State-space model:, ϕ(t) = c 0 + c T + c 2 T 2 + c 3 T 3 x = Ā x + Bū + Ē d x = [T T W ] T, ū {0,, 2, 3, 4}, d = [TI W loss ] T ȳ = [ 0 ] x, x = h (p) SYSID 2006, Newcastle p. 9/7

ressurizer arameters State space equation matrices: B = Ā = W HE c p M 0 m M K W c p M K W C pw, Ē = K W c p M K W C pw m M 0 0 C pw. arameters with known values: W HE, c p, M, m 2. arameter with an acceptable initial guess: W loss 3. arameters with completely unknown values: C pw, K W. SYSID 2006, Newcastle p. 0/7

Identification reliminary steps Scaling: to obtain a dimensionless form Measured input and output: scaled. 0.9 0.8 u 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0 2 3 4 5 6 Time [h] 0.8 0.6 y 0.4 0.2 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 Time [h] Sufficient excitation: by the old "on-off" controller SYSID 2006, Newcastle p. /7

Identification Structure validation ESS method: set of candidate model structures y(k) = n r i= b i z nc + a i z u(k d) + Investigated structures (with d = 0): i= q i z + q 2i z 2 + p i z + p 2i z 2u(k d) n r =,n c = 0; n r = 2,n c = 0; n r = 3,n c = 0 n r = 4,n c = 0; n r =,n c = ; n r =,n c = 2 n r = 3,n c = ; n r = 2,n c = Result of model structure validation: physical model structure (n r = 2,n c = 0) confirmed (M is known) SYSID 2006, Newcastle p. 2/7

Identification Initial step Criterion functions: V (N,θ) = N (y(i) ŷ(i)) N 2, V 2 (N,θ) = i= N N (p(i) ˆp(i)) 2 i= arameters to be estimated: [ θ = C pw K W ] T W loss, (x2 (0)) Method: Nelder-Mead simplex search parameter lower end (%) upper end (%) Results: C pw 93.284 07.46 K W 94.69 05.983 W loss 99.9432 00.056 SYSID 2006, Newcastle p. 3/7

Identification Iterative procedure for refining θ = [C pw K W W loss ] T and θ 2 = [c 0 c c 2 c 3 ] T. i:=0; set the values of ˆθ (0) and ˆθ 2 (0) 2. Using the initial values ˆθ 2 (i), estimate θ 2 with fixed θ := ˆθ (i) applying the simplex search method and criterion function V = V + V 2 ; results in ˆθ 2 (i + ). 3. Invert the temperature from the pressure measurements using ˆθ 2 (i + ). 4. Using the initial values ˆθ (i) estimate θ with fixed θ 2 := ˆθ 2 (i + ) applying the simplex search method and criterion function V = V + V 2 ; results in ˆθ (i + ). 5. If sufficient convergence in V, then stop, else i:=i+; go to step (2). SYSID 2006, Newcastle p. 4/7

Identification Results Scaled model matrices: A = 0 3¾ 4.465 4.456 5.52 5.52,B =¾ 3.63 0 3 0,E =¾ 2.927 0 3 0 0 2.03 0 8 Updated pressure-temperature curve coefficients: c 0 = 0.6397, c = 4.893 0 2 c 2 = 9.238 0 5, c 3 = 7.608 0 8 0.9 0.8 0.7 Model validation output 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 measured output simulated output SYSID 2006, Newcastle p. 5/7

Conclusion Dynamic model: low order, based on first engineering principles Advantage: good initial guesses were available Model structure validation by ESS method arameter estimation: nonlinear in parameters, simplex method physical parameters: small number, in the state equations pressure-temperature curve parameters: in the output equation simple iterative scheme followed by an initial step SYSID 2006, Newcastle p. 6/7

Aim and the physical system Aim: developing a dynamic model of the primary circuit of VVER plants for controller design purposes. Model has to be minimal and its parameters have to be physical meaning. Valve positiont ressurizer: ressure controller Heating power ressurizer, R 23 bar 325 C l R S Steam generator S Steam 46 bar, 260 C 450 t/h, 0,25% l S m S,in m S,out Steam generator: Level controller Base signal R N 297 C Valve position T C,HL Reactor,R Reactor power controller v Main hidraulic pump 220-230 C T C,CL Inlet secundary water 222 C ressurizer: Level controller Base signal Correction signal reheater Fazekas Cs., Szederkényi., Hangos M.K. SZTAKI - 2007, Nov. 5 - p. 3/38

Model: State space model dn dt dm C dt dt C dt p v 2 + p 2 v + p 3 = N + S (25) Λ = m in m out (26) = p, C m in T C,I T C +c p, C m out 5 + W R c p, C M C c 6 K T,S, T C T W a Kloss, C T C T out,c (27) dm S dt dt S dt = m S,in m S,out (28) = c L p,s S c L M p,s m S,in T SSW T L S +cp,s m S,out T S dt W dt dt R dt = = m S,out E evap,s + K T,S,2 T W T S b Kloss,S T S T out,s (29) c p,w M W K T,S, T C T W a KT,S,2 T W T S b (30) c p, R M R χ m R >0 c p, C m R T C,HL + χ m R <0 c p, R m R T R W loss, R + W heat, R c p, R m R T R (3) W R = c Ψ N (32) p S = p T (T S ) (33) l R = A R M C ϕ(t C ) V C 0 (34) p R = p T (T R ) (35) Fazekas Cs., Szederkényi., Hangos M.K. SZTAKI - 2007, Nov. 5 - p. 8/38

Model: Variables and parameters Variables State variables: N, M C, T C, T R, M S, T S, T W Input variables: v, m in, m S,in, W heat, R Disturbances: m out, m S,out, T S,SW, T C,I Output variables: N (W R ), l R (M C ), p R, p S Constants Reactor: parameters of nuclear physics: other: c Ψ. Λ, S; parameters of the control rod: p, p 2, p 3 ; Liquid in the primary circuit: c p, C, K T,S,, K loss, C, a. Steam generator: c L p,s, K T,S,2, K loss,s, b. Wall of the steam generator: c p,w M W. ressurizer: c p, R, W loss, R, V 0 C. Known constants are T out, C = 00 o C, T out,s = 260 o C (in case of the unit and 3) and T out,s = 259 o C (in case of the unit 4) Fazekas Cs., Szederkényi., Hangos M.K. SZTAKI - 2007, Nov. 5 - p. 9/38

E: Decomposition It is seen from the state equations (25)-(3) that the parameters in the neutron flux balance equation (25) can be estimated independently of the parameters of the other operating units. Then the coupled equations (26)-(30) describing the dynamics of the liquid in the primary circuit, in the steam generator and the dynamics of the tube-wall of the steam generator form another component. The third component is the pressurizer that depends on the dynamics of the liquid in the primary circuit. T W STEAM ENERATOR T C TUBE-WALL T S REACTOR W R RIMARY CIRCUIT T W M C RESSURIZER T C Fazekas Cs., Szederkényi., Hangos M.K. SZTAKI - 2007, Nov. 5 - p. 20/38

Results: ressurizer A good quality and long measured data sequence from the Unit computer exists describing the dynamics of pressurizer using the old "on-off type" pressure controller, this data sequence is used for parameter estimation. Old data arameter Unit Time span: 8.88 h c p,r J/kg/K 5886.3 W loss,r W.68 0 5 Error - 5.9828 0 4 Fazekas Cs., Szederkényi., Hangos M.K. SZTAKI - 2007, Nov. 5 - p. 30/38

Results: ressurizer 2 327. 327 Measured Simulated by model Temperature 326.9 326.8 Temperature [C] 326.7 326.6 326.5 326.4 326.3 326.2 326. 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Time [h] Fazekas Cs., Szederkényi., Hangos M.K. SZTAKI - 2007, Nov. 5 - p. 3/38

0.0029029 Results: Quality of estimates 3.72 x 05 0.004039 0.004607 0.00347 0.0023349 0.007669 5.5 5 4.5.7 x 0 3.7.69 0.00989.68 0.00989 W loss,r 4 3.5 0.007669 0.0023349 3 2.5.67 Error value 0.0029029 2 4000.66 0.00347.5 0.004039 0.004607.64.66.68.65.64 4000 6000 8000 0000 c p,r [J/kg/K] Fazekas Cs., Szederkényi., Hangos M.K. SZTAKI - 2007, Nov. 5 - p. 34/38 x 0 5 W loss,r.7 6000 8000 c [J/kg/K] p,r