LIS Interfaces: Basics, Implementation and Pitfalls

Similar documents
NURSING INFORMATICS. Nikole L. Farmer, MSN, RN, PMP September 6, 2014

HL7 Fundamentals. Presented by: Dana McDonough, Carolina Velasquez, & Bing Chen. August 2014

HL7 Interface Specification Merge LabAccess v. 3.6

Interfacing Boot Camp

ELR Clarification Document for EHR Technology Certification

HL7 & HL7 CDA: The Implementation of Thailand s Healthcare Messaging Exchange Standards Nawanan Theera-Ampornpunt, M.D., Ph.D.

A Semantic Foundation for Achieving HIE Interoperability

ONC s Laboratory Results Interface (LRI) and Laboratory Orders Interface (LOI) Implementation Guides and LIS-EHR Data Exchange

Meaningful Use Stage 2 as it Relates to the Lab Implementing the Public Health Agency Interface. Interface

HL7 Clinical Document Architecture: Overview and Applications

HL7 Conformance Statement

Generic EHR HL7 Interface Specification Abraxas v. 4

CHAN Health Information Exchange (MPI/HIE) RFP

HIE Ready 2.0 SPECIFICATIONS MATRIX. Product Name: Version Number: Preferred Message and Trigger

Bi-Directional Interface between EMR and Quest Diagnostics Microsoft.NET with SQL Server Reporting Services solution for Healthcare Company

The Continuity of Care Document. Changing the Landscape of Healthcare Information Exchange

JiveX Enterprise PACS Solutions. JiveX HL7 Gateway Conformance Statement - HL7. Version: As of

Installation and Maintenance of Health IT Systems: System Interfaces and Integration

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Certification: A Guide for EHR Product Managers

Conformance Testing of Healthcare Data Exchange Standards for EHR Certification

New York ehealth Collaborative. Health Information Exchange and Interoperability April 2012

Business and Technical Description of Commercial Systems The scope of the technical solution is further described below.

HL7 Conformance Statement

ImagePilot. HL7 Conformance Statement. Manufacturer: 1 Sakura-machi, Hino-shi Tokyo , Japan

HL7 V2 Implementation Guide Authoring Tool Proposal

Ross Cantor Director of Sales and Client Relations Lifepoint Informatics

How To Get A Medical Record On A Medical Device

The Do s and Don ts of Medical Device integration

ELR Clarification Document for EHR Technology Certification V1.1

HL7 Format and Electronic Sharing

HL7 & KMEHR. A comparison. Medical informatics AJ 2013/2014. Authors: Tessa Borloo Nele Pien

IICC Technical Overview

ShadowLink 2. Overview. May 4, ONLINE SUPPORT emdat.com/ticket/ PHONE SUPPORT (608) ext. 1

Clinical Document Exchange Integration Guide - Outbound

Test Procedure for (b)(6) Transmission of electronic laboratory tests and values/results to ambulatory providers inpatient setting only

Medical device security

HOSPITAL POINT-OF-CARE (POC) testing is projected to nearly triple within a decade,

MOSAIQ External Systems Interfaces (ESI) Product Offerings

Hematology, Chemistry, Microbiology. Clinical Pathology and Anatomic Pathology. Hospital Information System or Practice Management System

EHR Meaningful Use Stages 1 and 2. What They Mean To You. Pat Wolfram

Meaningful Use Stage 2 Update: Deploying SNOMED CT to provide decision support in the EHR

Open Platform. Clinical Portal. Provider Mobile. Orion Health. Rhapsody Integration Engine. RAD LAB PAYER Rx

LOINC Mapping AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES. CLINICAL DATA NORMALIZATION through LOINC Mapping TURN OVER TO LEARN MORE. Test Dictionary Process

Certification Guidance for EHR Technology Developers Serving Health Care Providers Ineligible for Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Payments

Adding Management.

International HL7 Interoperability Conference - IHIC 2010

Project Initiation Report HealthInsight HIE

HL7 Interface Specification. HL7 Interface 1.2

Health Information Exchange. Scalable and Affordable

Goals. Accelerating adoption & exchange of EHRs project. Evaluation Indicators EMR adoption (Hospitals) 20% (100 hospitals)

Michigan Pulse Oximetry Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease

Simplifying the Interface Challenge in Healthcare. Healthcare Software Provider or Medical Device Manufacturer s Approach to Healthcare Integration

Accelerating EMR Interoperability with ELINCS. Streamlining Lab Connectivity to Physician EMRs

RamSoft PACS 3.0 HL7 Conformance Statement

Advancing Laboratory Interoperability in Health IT

New Jersey Department of Health. Electronic Laboratory Reporting On-Boarding Manual. Version 1.4

HIE Services & Pricing

Promoting perinatal safety through discrete data interoperability across multiple EHRs Vish Anantraman, MD, MS Michael I.

Introduction to Information and Computer Science: Information Systems

3M Health Information Systems

PARCA Certified PACS Interface Analyst (CPIA) Requirements

Healthcare Data: Secondary Use through Interoperability

Introduction to Epic Bridges. Empowering Extraordinary Patient Care

Clinical Mapping (CMAP) Draft for Public Comment

Reduces development time by 90%

IHE Australia Workshops July Prepared by: Heather Grain Chair: Standards Australia IT14 Health Informatics and Ehealth Education

Genomics and the EHR. Mark Hoffman, Ph.D. Vice President Research Solutions Cerner Corporation

LIS Interfaces: Basics, Implementation, and Pitfalls

Integrating a PACS/Imaging System into an EHR Anwar Motan John Riggs, MD

How To Improve Data Collection

20/20 Integration Guide

Health Information Exchange in Minnesota & North Dakota

HL7 Clinical Genomics and Structured Documents Work Groups

THE CHALLENGE OF COORDINATING EMR

Understanding Meaningful Use with a Focus on Testing the HL7 V2 Messaging Standards

HL7 Interface Specification Merge Eye Station v. 11.3

Health Informatics Standardization: Relevance and Indian Initiatives

HIE Services & Pricing

HL7 and Meaningful Use

Electronic Health Records: The Intersection of Public Health Surveillance and Clinical Medicine

NIST Tooling and Test Procedures in Support of Meaningful Use

A Development of HL7 Middleware for Medical Device Communication

Transcription:

A Review of Pathology Informatics LIS Interfaces: Basics, Implementation and Pitfalls James H. Harrison, Jr., M.D., Ph.D. Division of Biomedical Informatics Departments of Public Health Sciences and Pathology University of Virginia james.harrison@virginia.edu October 9, 2012

Key Concept: Interoperability The ability of systems to provide services to and accept services from each other, and to use the exchanged services to operate effectively together An interface is a communications connection and translation mechanism between two systems that may have different internal representations of data Laboratory interoperability: patient registration, orders, specimens, results & reports

Data Interoperability Syntactic Interoperability Symbols are accurately exchanged Semantic Interoperability Symbols are correctly associated with concepts

Digital Communications ISO Networking Reference Model Message Structure & Content 7 Application Data model and semantics 6 Presentation Characters, lines, delimiters, fields 5 Session Authentication/authorization 4 Transport End-to-end communication (TCP) Low Level Transmission 3 Network Packet routing (IP) 2 Data Link Ethernet, FDDI, etc. 1 Physical Fiber, coax, UTP, µwave, Wifi

Digital Communications ISO Networking Reference Model Message Structure & Content 7 Application Semantics 6 Presentation Syntax Data standards: HL7, CLSI (ASTM), IHE, etc. 5 Session Authentication/authorization 4 Transport End-to-end communication (TCP) Low Level Transmission 3 Network Packet routing (IP) 2 Data Link Ethernet, FDDI, etc. 1 Physical Fiber, coax, UTP, µwave, Wifi

Generic Interface Structure Mapping Table Message construction & parsing Messages: Patient registration Orders Results Message construction & parsing Mapping Table Lab database MSH ^~\& ADT1 GOOD EVN A01 20070818112 PID 1 PATID1234^5^ MSH ^~\& ADT1 GOOD NK1 1 NUCLEAR^NELDA EVN A01 20070818112 PV1 1 I 200 PID 1 PATID1234^5^ NK1 1 NUCLEAR^NELDA PV1 1 I 200 Transaction logs Error logs MSH ^~\& ADT1 GOOD EVN A01 20070818112 PID 1 PATID1234^5^ MSH ^~\& ADT1 GOOD NK1 1 NUCLEAR^NELDA EVN A01 20070818112 PV1 1 I 200 PID 1 PATID1234^5^ NK1 1 NUCLEAR^NELDA PV1 1 I 200 EMR database

Relevance of System Interfaces EMR value proposition requires interoperability HITECH incentives are increasing lab clients with EMR Ambulatory EMR < 25% in 2009 to > 80% by 2016 Meaningful Use requirements are evolving CPOE and lab reporting becomes required in MU 2 Data content HL7 version progression (HL7 2.5.1) LOINC and SNOMED inclusion Financial impact of implementation and upgrade Ubiquitous; the glue that holds the system together

HL7 Department of of Public Health Sciences

Laboratory Interfaces Local Health System LPL System Reference Laboratory HL7 Interface Engine EMR VPN VPN Community Providers Instrument Manager LIS Ancillaries & Research Systems Analyzer Analyzer Analyzer POC Devices & Base Station

Instrument Interfaces Local Health System LPL System Reference Laboratory HL7 Interface Engine EMR VPN VPN Community Providers Instrument Manager LIS Ancillaries & Research Systems Analyzer Analyzer Analyzer POC Devices & Base Station

Instrument Interfaces Connect instruments to LIS Instrument manager may mediate POC manager is analogous Unidirectional Enter accession # and test, send results once Bidirectional Receive & store orders; barcoded samples; store and resend results Order broadcast/query across multiple analyzers; throughput issues Data content Proprietary instrument drivers CLSI (formerly ASTM) standard, majority HL7 standard; new HL7-based profile from IVD Industry Connectivity Consortium (IICC) and IHE Relatively plug-and-play and improving

Local System Interfaces Local Health System LPL System Reference Laboratory HL7 Interface Engine EMR VPN VPN Community Providers Instrument Manager LIS Ancillaries & Research Systems Analyzer Analyzer Analyzer POC Devices & Base Station

HL7 Messaging Standard Health Level Seven International A framework for messaging between healthcare applications (ISO level 6 & 7) Version 2 released in 1988 Version 2.3 (1997) widely deployed, 2.7 is current Version 3 released 2003 Membership required for use previously, now standards to be released at no cost Not plug and play

HL7 Version 2 Defines message types for medical events: admission/registration/discharge/transfer, queries, orders, results, clinical observations, billing, medical records, etc. Defines transaction model for using the messages (initiation, response, error handling) Defines message structure (data fields), but limited requirements for content Pragmatic standard that predated terminology standards

Admit Message (A01) Segments, delimiters, fields, components & subcomponents MSH ^~\& ADT1 GOOD HEALTH HOSPITAL GHH LAB, INC. GOOD HEALTH HOSPITAL 198808181126 SECURITY ADT^A01^ADT_A01 MSG00001 P 2.5.1 EVN A01 200708181123 PID 1 PATID1234^5^M11^ADT1^MR^GOOD HEALTH HOSPITAL~123456789^^^USSSA^SS EVERYMAN^ADAM^A^III 19610615 M C 2222 HOME STREET^^GREENSBORO^NC^ 27401-1020 GL (555) 555-2004 (555)555-2004 S PATID12345001^2^M10^ ADT1^AN^A 444333333 987654^NC NK1 1 NUCLEAR^NELDA^W SPO^SPOUSE NK^NEXT OF KIN PV1 1 I 2000^2012^01 004777^ATTEND^AARON^A SUR ADM A0

Result Message Example (ORU-R01) MSH ^~\& IDXLAB UVAHSC DADD 199808281130 ORU^R01 199808281130 P 2.2 PID xxxxxxxx lname^fname^mi 19980828 M ^^ 3116488572 PV1 OP STFM^ 483230^lname^^fname mi.(4201) ^ OP 199808281115 ORC RE 320532-0^0 4201^lname^^fname mi. ^ OBR 320532-0^0 CPBAS^BASIC METABOLIC PANEL^^CPBAS 01012000^13:54 ^ 01012000^13:54 ^ 4201^lname^^fname mi.(4201) M61675 CHEM F CPBAS^CPBAS ^^^^^R ^~^~^ OBX 1 NM NA^SODIUM 1 137 mmol/l 136-145 F 01012000^14:15 UVA^ 2886^AUTO^VERIFY OBX 2 NM K^POTASSIUM 1 4.0 mmol/l 3.5-4.5 F 01012000^14:15 UVA^ 2886^AUTO^VERIFY OBX 3 NM CL^CHLORIDE 1 101 mmol/l 98-107 F 01012000^14:15 UVA^ 2886^AUTO^VERIFY OBX 4 NM CO2^CO2 1 24 mmol/l 23-31 F 01012000^14:15 UVA^ 2886^AUTO^VERIFY OBX 5 NM BUN^UREA NITROGEN 1 23 mg/dl 8.4-25.7 F 01012000^14:15 UVA^ 2886^AUTO^VERIFY OBX 6 NM CREAT^CREATININE 1 1.0 mg/dl 0.7-1.3 F 01012000^14:15 UVA^ 2886^AUTO^VERIFY OBX 7 NM GLUC^GLUCOSE 1 135 mg/dl 74-99 H F 01012000^14:15 UVA^ 2886^AUTO^VERIFY OBX 8 NM CALCM^CALCIUM 1 9.8 mg/dl 8.4-10.2 F 01012000^14:15 UVA^ 2886^AUTO^VERIFY OBX 9 ST GFRCAL^CALC GFR (ml/min/1.73m2) 1 >60 F 01012000^14:15 UVA^ 2886^AUTO^VERIFY

Textual Results (ORU) OBR ^ 7352687 DIA0021^CHEST, SINGLE VIEW 199808261230 PS4 ^^^ 993808^lname^fname mname 199808261230 RX P 1^^^^^P^^PRIOR 1 990283&lname&fname mi&&& OBX 1 TX DIA0021GDT PRELIMINARY-THIS IS A PRELIMINARY REPORT AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS P OBX 2 TX DIA0021GDT PRELIMINARY AND MAY BE AMENDED IN THE FINAL REPORT. P OBX 3 TX DIA0021GDT PT ACCT NO: xxxxxxx P OBX 4 TX DIA0021GDT ORDER NO: 90001 P OBX 5 TX DIA0021GDT EXAMINATION: P OBX 6 TX DIA0021GDT DIA 0021 - CHEST, SINGLE VIEW EXAM DT/TIME: Aug 8, 1998 1:03AM P OBX 7 TX DIA0021GDT Accession No: ###### CPT: 71010... 28300713 P OBX 8 TX DIA0021GDT CLINICAL DATA:,--TRAUMA ALERT P OBX 9 TX DIA0021GDT P OBX 10 TX DIA0021GDT FULL RESULT: Examination: Chest, single view, dated xx/xx/xxxx P OBX 11 TX DIA0021GDT P OBX 12 TX DIA0021GDT COMPARISON: None P OBX 13 TX DIA0021GDT P OBX 14 TX DIA0021GDT FINDINGS: P OBX 15 TX DIA0021GDT Single portable supine view of the chest. EKG wires overlie the P OBX 16 TX DIA0021GDT patient. The lungs are without focal consolidation. Pulmonary P OBX 17 TX DIA0021GDT vasculature is mildly cephalized, likely secondary to supine P OBX 18 TX DIA0021GDT positioning. There is no evidence of pneumothorax or pleural P OBX 19 TX DIA0021GDT effusion. The hila, mediastinum, and heart appear within normal P OBX 20 TX DIA0021GDT limits for supine positioning and AP projection. P OBX 21 TX DIA0021GDT P OBX 22 TX DIA0021GDT P OBX 23 TX DIA0021GDT PRELIMINARY-THIS IS A PRELIMINARY REPORT AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS P OBX 24 TX DIA0021GDT PRELIMINARY AND MAY BE AMENDED IN THE FINAL REPORT. P OBX 25 TX DIA0021GDT P OBX 26 TX DIA0021GDT P OBX 27 TX DIA0021GDT P OBX 28 TX DIA0021GDT IMPRESSION: P OBX 29 TX DIA0021GDT 1. No evidence of acute cardiopulmonary disease. P

Results Message Definition (ORU) OBX Segment Definition

Variability in HL7 Interfaces Site 1: Site 2: Site 3: OBX 1 CE ABO^ABO GROUP O^Type O OBX 1 CE BLDTYP^ABO GROUP TYPEO^Type O OBX 1 CE ABOTYPE^ABO GROUP OPOS^Type O

Variability in HL7 Interfaces Site 1: Site 2: Site 3: OBX 1 CE ABO^ABO GROUP O^Type O OBX 1 CE BLDTYP^ABO GROUP TYPEO^Type O OBX 1 CE ABOTYPE^ABO GROUP OPOS^Type O Requires mapping between systems and limits interface re-use

LRI and LOI Initiatives Standardize HL7 interfaces for ambulatory lab orders and results as part of Meaningful Use Based on HL7 2.5.1, with additional field content requirements Incorporates LOINC for test names, SNOMED for non-numerical results including microbiology Will require upgrade of most existing interfaces http://wiki.siframework.org Laboratory Orders Interface Laboratory Results Interface

Report Layout and Styling No style or layout information in routine OBX segment; reports are fragmented into separate lines Possibilities for styled reports RTF formatted text Marked up text (e.g., xhtml) PDF HL7 v. 3 clinical documents (XML, allows structured data) Send as HL7 v. 2 messages using OBX field 5 or MIME attachments? HL7 v. 3 interface? Both sending and receiving systems must be able to handle the messaging strategy Receiving system must be able to display the results

Goals for HL7 Version 3 Substantially reduce interface development time Clarify spec for messages Fully-defined information model for messages Method for conformance specification Support modern communications infrastructures Reference Information Model (RIM) Coherent shared information model Includes all content of HL7 messages Provides consistency to messages across usage settings

HL7 RIM Reference Information Model Entities Roles Participation Acts Messaging Structured documents

HL7 v. 3 Status Limited uptake since 2003/4 release Most impact in clinical document arena Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) Combines structured and human-readable data Continuity-of-Care Document (CCD) RIM and derived messages require special modeling tools and are complex in practice Few interfaces exist

HL7 FHIR Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/fhir/ New messaging strategy initiated 2011 Simplified interoperability messages derived from the HL7 RIM, but shielding complexity Messages are aggregates of resources that represent clinical concepts (physician, patient, test, specimen) with defined data elements Individually understandable Expressed in XML with both structured data and human-readable text (xhtml) Internet-standard communications (HTTP & Atom) Currently in draft for comment Has potential to yield drop-in interfaces with both good visual formatting of reports and machine-readable structured data

Interface Implementation Work with vendors of both systems Define HL7 v. 2 message set Compare data element representations in both systems Build mapping tables Implement communications in vendor frameworks Test results/reports (both correct and erroneous data) Validate data display in downstream systems 2 4 weeks of analyst time, $5,000 - $20,000 HL7 interface engine, ~$200,000 plus IT staff Data mapping and message processing based on rules and scripts

HL7 Department of of Public Health Sciences

External Interfaces Local Health System LPL System Reference Laboratory HL7 Interface Engine EMR VPN VPN Community Providers Instrument Manager LIS Ancillaries & Research Systems Analyzer Analyzer Analyzer POC Devices & Base Station

External Interface Implementation Reference laboratories HL7 Interfaces generally available Physician offices Ambulatory EMR, increasing numbers and variety Affiliated hospitals and clinics In-patient/ambulatory EMR Laboratory-Provider Link (LPL) systems Local device or vendor service Vendor handles interfaces with multiple client systems May be available through reference laboratories Internet communications require data protection Periodic encrypted connection or VPN, access policies Business associate agreement with client and LPL

Interface Maintenance Immediate response to communication problems Correct and resend failed transactions Daily verification of operation Daily check of error and transaction logs Problems include bad data (e.g., unknown physician) Correct and resend failed transactions Latency measurements monthly Editing and testing mappings (new physicians, test catalog updates, locations, etc.) Revalidation of data transmission and results display biannually and after changes or upgrades

Evolving Interoperability Challenges Managing and synchronizing the test catalog across multiple client EMR systems (explosion of mapping tables) Mapping the test catalog correctly to LOINC Managing the progression of reporting to both structured data and better report formatting Identifying patients across multiple client EMRs Maintaining current downstream system validation when those systems change Report distribution across multiple systems Necessity for institutional collaboration on security policies

Take-home Points System interfaces form the crucial glue that holds multi-vendor healthcare information systems together Laboratories face interfacing challenges: Clients are moving to adopt a myriad of new EMR systems Regulations will require upgrade of current interfaces The software and information design of system interfaces is well established, but is not plug-and-play and additional standards development is underway Effective strategies to support internal and external interfaces are available Significant effort and cost involved Planning with awareness of interface basics necessary for effective use