Infrastructure Working Council (IWC) Meeting Presentations Day Two June 9, 2016 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
Electric Highway: Past & Future Ashley Horvat Vice President, Electric Highways & Strategic Initiatives EPRI IWC Seattle, WA June 9, 2016
App Overview 2 #1 Ranked EV charging app Available for free iphone, ipad, Apple Watch, Android, and web 450k mobile installs 1:1 Downloads to EV registrations 90k Global Stations 400k reviews, 85k photos 5 Star rating in App Stores Apple-designated itunes Essentials Key Features: Charging station locator Driver messaging PlugScore driver satisfaction
Best Infrastructure Coverage 3 More than 35,000 charging stations in US+CA Includes Clipper Creek, Eaton, Siemens, Bosch, Schneider, Leviton * Current as of 2016-Q1. Count excludes level 1 stations and residential stations
E commerce Route Planning OEM Charging Programs Driver Messaging` Search Rich Managed Location Details Availability Network Repairs Usage History Driver & Vehicle Personalization PlugShare API In Vehicle Mobile Web
PlugShare Services List 5 Electric Highways Division (Nationwide DCFC Network) Consulting & EV infrastructure market research and analytics tool White label app development Custom in-app experience Consumer insights survey research Mobile payment for charging In-vehicle charging station POI data licensing Mobile app charging station POI data licensing Customer service and maintenance tool Dealership training and sales support Embeddable charging maps
Today s discussion Founding principles Why DCFC Matters Past West Coast Electric Highway Oregon & Washington Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) 300 DCFC Site analysis (Cost benefit for ratepayers and utility) Document the crucial role of DCFC to promote EV adoption and maximize evmt in support of California s ambitious ZEV and GHG reduction goals Demonstrate how PG&E s DCFC sites complement and support other private and publicly funded EV charging stations and networks, both existing and planned Seattle City Light (SCL): EV Infrastructure gap analysis and policy/programmatic recommendations Future Electric Highway California, then nationwide
Why DCFC Matters Corridor charging adds value to long range BEVs
Why dcfc matters The price of no corridor charging?
Why (RELIABLE) dcfc matters Successful Charging Rates 7.6% 85.7% 8.6% 5.7% Tesla Supercharger Based on 35 evaluations 24.7% 42.7% 25.0% Other DCFC Based on 288 evaluations % success rate 95 100% 90 94% 80 89% Below 80% Source: PlugShare, rating over 12 mos. ending 12/15
Case study: The west Coast Electric Highway In 2010, British Columbia, WA, OR, & CA leaders signed Pacific Coast Action Plan on Climate & Energy, which would Make the 1,350 miles of the West Coast s Main Street, I-5, an alternative fuels corridor First Step: Create an Electric Highway from BC to Baja (BC2BC) For more see: www.westcoastelectrichighway.com http://www energycentral com/enduse/elec
Pay with PlugShare is available at all West Coast Electric Highway Charging Stations (L2 & DCFC)
WCEH: Host Site Specs Restrooms, amenities Easy access Safety bollards ½ mile of hwy
How is it going along WCEH? Map of West Coast Electric Highway PlugScores on 04/16/2016. 56 sites in OR and WA represented. Color indicates PlugScore and size shows # of reviews since 05/2015.
PG&E Project: Siting DC Fast Charging for Electric Vehicles in PG&E s Service Territory PG&E contracted Energy and Environmental Economics (E3), PlugShare, & UC Davis to study optimal DC fast charger siting within Pacific Gas and Electric s (PG&E s) utility service territory. Utilized an existing transportation demand model created by UC Davis to identify 300 locations within PG&E s territory, along popular transportation corridors and met minimal coverage requirements across PG&E s 70,000 square mile territory. Ranked based upon their modeled driver demand. Modeled to have a 1-mile radius, specific sites were located within the 1-mile radius that had available transformer capacity and were publicly accessible. Resulted in over 14,000 businesses, restaurants, etc. that can be investigated to host a DCFC.
PG&E Project: Overview of Team s Approach to DCFC Site Selection
PG&E Project 4. Check whether sites are within a 300 ft. radius of a secondary transformer with sufficient capacity for x# of chargers 3.Find potential sites for chargers within bubble 2. 0.5 mile radius bubble around location 1. Location of unmet charger demand (lat lon, from UCD)
PG&E Project: Siting DC Fast Charging for Electric Vehicles in PG&E s Service Territory Best Practices in DC Fast Charger Siting A Best Practices Guide & micro-siting tool were developed for a boots-on-the-ground approach helping DCFC installers to identify ideal locations that will meet customer needs and preferences, and minimize other installation costs. Siting DCFCs to maximize EV Adoption The Driver Perspective The Charger Host Perspective The Charging Network Developer Perspective Selecting Potential DCFC Sites in PG&E s Territory Forecasting EV Adoption in 2025 Mapping the Existing Public Charging Landscape Macro-Siting of DCFCs: Identifying Locations of Unmet Charger Need Fast Charging Demand Types Corridor Workplace Home Site Selection Methodology Conclusions: Literature review, expert interviews and siting analysis
PG&E Project: Identified DCFC Siting Opportunities
SCL STUDy: A Cost Benefit Analysis, Implications of Electric Vehicle Adoption in Seattle City Light s Service Territory Energy and Environmental Economics (E3) evaluated the distribution grid impacts of PEV charging for Seattle City Light (SCL) and partnered with PlugShare to consult SCL on a path forward. Based on results of an in-depth data analysis of existing infrastructure in SCL territory and an audit of other utility EV Programs & activities, drawing from the work performed by E3 for California utilities on behalf of CalETC. For the period from 2016 to 2030 E3 finds that light-duty PEVs provide a net benefit of $374 million to the region, primarily gasoline savings that significantly outweigh the cost of delivered electricity for PEV charging. This equates to a benefit of $5,758 per battery electric vehicle (BEV) and $4,859 per plug-in hybrid electric vehicle (PHEV). A 25% increase in PEV adoption would increase the net benefits by 79% to $669 million. The utility retail rate revenue exceeds the cost of delivered electricity for light-duty PEV charging, providing net ratepayer benefits of $83 million. The ratepayer benefits per BEV and PHEV are $1,250 and $1,117 respectively. In the medium- and heavy-duty sector, E3 finds that buses and forklifts also provide net regional benefits of roughly $620,000 & $5,000 per vehicle respectively under the base case.
SCL STUDY PlugShare provided an assessment of PEV charging infrastructure in the Seattle area Across all networks, of the seven sites with the most use, with 100 or more PlugShare customer reviews, four sites had fewer than 80% positive and neutral reviews - more than twice as many negative reviews as the national average. Due in part to PEV Project funding, Blink is the largest network and controls 74% of the 1,237 stations in the Seattle area. However, growth in the Blink network has slowed considerably, with only 36 stations added since May 2013.
Electric highways division Vision: A national DC fast charger network for longdistance corridor travel Mission: Unleash sales of new wave of long-range BEVs Established: Late 2015 Successes to date: Won nearly $2MM funding from the California Energy Commission to build a DCQC corridor on US-101 Competing in several other projects for additional DCQC corridor charging Developed a plan to build a US national DCQC network Active discussions with worldwide partners
Electric Highway Division Network deployment schedule to reflect PEV installed base & % of trips that begin and end w/in the state Phase 1 & Phase 2
Electric Highway Division Focused exclusively on building a corridor-based, longdistance nationwide DCFC network In partnership with automakers We bring proprietary data science to network charging design & operation We own & operate EVSE Central control of pricing, maintenance, & repair, standards User experience drives all priorities Redundancy Multi-faceted Electric Highway Software platform Mobile & In-dash apps
Electric Highway Phase 1: U.S. Highway 101 CEC Grant-Funded Highway 101 (8 Locatio
Ashley Horvat (503) 360-2500 ashley@plugshare.com @ashleyinoregon
Open Charge Alliance update Electric Power Research Institute s Infrastructure Working Council Meetings Seattle, WA June 8 th & 9 th 2016
Since its publication OCPP 1.6 has been downloaded more than 3600 times by 77 different countries Top 10: 1. Germany (583) 2. Spain (344) 3. France (266) 4. Netherlands (253) 5. United States (214) 6. United Kingdom (159) 7. Italy (153) 8. Sweden (131) 9. India (118) 10. China (106)
OCA is hosting its Second Congress in Amsterdam on 13-14 th June Business Event on Monday 13 th Open to members and non members Festive release of the Compliance Test tool Workshops on OCPP implementations, Compliance testing, standardisation and certification Member Event on Tuesday 14 th Open to members Deep dive workshops on the Compliance test tool, next version of OCPP, RFCs, standardisation and certification
You are all invited to the Second OCA Congress! Attendance is free If you would like to join the Business Event on Monday 13 th via Webex and the phone bridge, please contact info@openchargealliance.org for dial-in details
At the Congress OCA will launch the Compliance test tool Tool can be purchased by OCA members and non members For more information: www.openchargealliance.org Benefits Can be used for validation of OCPP version 1.6 implementations Makes implementing OCPP version 1.6 easier Helps with integrating OCPP 1.6 implementations of different vendors
Whilst OCPP 1.6 is taking off, OCA is working on the next version of OCPP following market demand 2015 2016 2017 OCPP 1.6 General corrections Additional support for JSON over web sockets Smart Charging added Enhanced Security OCPP 2.0 Restructured Enhanced Configuration, Commissioning and Control Further alignment with Standards for Demand response and IEC/ISO 15118 Enhanced Security
Some of the enhancements OCA is working on Enhanced Security Better fit for DC fast charging Focus on Customer experience secure communication channel mutual authentication secure firmware update logging of security events mode 4 status information Plug&Charge
Soon OCA will transfer development of OCPP to a Technical Committee at OASIS OCPP 1.6 & RFCs RFCs RFCs OCPP 2.0
Open Charge Alliance Elaad ESB Greenlots Schneider Electric EVbox ENEL Current Co-proposers
High Level Process Private Outreach with the draft TC proposal Publish TC proposal Call for participation in the TC Planning of the first TC meeting Bi-weekly calls 1 2 weeks 4 weeks 4 weeks 2 3 4 Publication of the draft for public review Processing comments Publication of the final draft for public review Vote 5 6 7 8
OASIS and IEC cooperation Developing a Liaison Agreement Dedicated Liaison members Share the draft version of the standard, the analyses of the OCPP-IEC standards alignment and RFCs Discuss the drafts during IEC Working Group meetings. Organize joint Technical Workshops The relevant IEC working groups are: TC57 WG 17 (alignment with 61850) ISO TC 22 SC31/IEC TC69 JWG1 (alignment with ISO/IEC 15118) TC57 WG21 (alignment with CIM)
If you would like to join the OASIS Technical Committee, please contact carol.geyer@oasis-open.org info@openchargealliance.com
Join OCA! Join the OCA Congress! Get working with the test tool! Join the development of the next version at OASIS!
Reasons for not joining OCA yet 1) I am happy with OCPP, but I trust you guys to do a great job, so let me know when the next version is available. 2) I am happy with my own solution, so I don t need OCPP 3) I will use OCPP, it is missing some things I need, but I see no point in sharing my clever insights with OCA. I ll keep those as a competitive advantage 4) I have been out campaigning for Donald Trump, so just haven t had the time to think about it 5) I ll tell you why, its because..