A Description of the 2nd Generation NOAA Global Ensemble Reforecast Data Set



Similar documents
Testing and Evaluation of GSI-Hybrid Data Assimilation and Its Applications for HWRF at the Developmental Testbed Center

Application of Numerical Weather Prediction Models for Drought Monitoring. Gregor Gregorič Jožef Roškar Environmental Agency of Slovenia

Developing Continuous SCM/CRM Forcing Using NWP Products Constrained by ARM Observations

Hybrid Data Assimilation in the GSI

Schedule WRF model executions in parallel computing environments using Python

Cloud/Hydrometeor Initialization in the 20-km RUC Using GOES Data

Distributed Computing. Mark Govett Global Systems Division

Very High Resolution Arctic System Reanalysis for

Titelmasterformat durch Klicken. bearbeiten

NOMADS. Jordan Alpert, Jun Wang NCEP/NWS. Jordan C. Alpert where the nation s climate and weather services begin

Description of zero-buoyancy entraining plume model

4.3. David E. Rudack*, Meteorological Development Laboratory Office of Science and Technology National Weather Service, NOAA 1.

Guy Carpenter Asia-Pacific Climate Impact Centre, School of energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong

Heavy Rainfall from Hurricane Connie August 1955 By Michael Kozar and Richard Grumm National Weather Service, State College, PA 16803

Comparative Evaluation of High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Models COSMO-WRF

How To Model An Ac Cloud

PART 1. Representations of atmospheric phenomena

Using Cloud-Resolving Model Simulations of Deep Convection to Inform Cloud Parameterizations in Large-Scale Models

Use of numerical weather forecast predictions in soil moisture modelling

An Integrated Simulation and Visualization Framework for Tracking Cyclone Aila

Validation n 2 of the Wind Data Generator (WDG) software performance. Comparison with measured mast data - Flat site in Northern France

Project Title: Quantifying Uncertainties of High-Resolution WRF Modeling on Downslope Wind Forecasts in the Las Vegas Valley

Frank and Charles Cohen Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA, U.S.A.

Breeding and predictability in coupled Lorenz models. E. Kalnay, M. Peña, S.-C. Yang and M. Cai

MOGREPS status and activities

CCAM GUI INSTRUCTION MANUAL FOR TAPM USERS (v1004t) Marcus Thatcher CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research

NOAA Big Data Project. David Michaud Acting Director, Office of Central Processing Office Monday, August 3, 2015

IMPACT OF SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY-AMERENUE QUANTUM WEATHER PROJECT MESONET DATA ON WRF-ARW FORECASTS

Convective Clouds. Convective clouds 1

MICROPHYSICS COMPLEXITY EFFECTS ON STORM EVOLUTION AND ELECTRIFICATION

6.4 THE SIERRA ROTORS PROJECT, OBSERVATIONS OF MOUNTAIN WAVES. William O. J. Brown 1 *, Stephen A. Cohn 1, Vanda Grubiši 2, and Brian Billings 2

The University of Melbourne cyclone tracking software

Real-time Ocean Forecasting Needs at NCEP National Weather Service

A Review on the Uses of Cloud-(System-)Resolving Models

Climate Extremes Research: Recent Findings and New Direc8ons

GCMs with Implicit and Explicit cloudrain processes for simulation of extreme precipitation frequency

Evalua&ng Downdra/ Parameteriza&ons with High Resolu&on CRM Data

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INFUSION CLIMATE BULLETIN

A Hybrid ETKF 3DVAR Data Assimilation Scheme for the WRF Model. Part II: Real Observation Experiments


COSMO Data Assimilation. Applications for Romanian Territory

A Real Case Study of Using Cloud Analysis in Grid-point Statistical Interpolation Analysis and Advanced Research WRF Forecast System

The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) toolkit

SIXTH GRADE WEATHER 1 WEEK LESSON PLANS AND ACTIVITIES

Mode-S Enhanced Surveillance derived observations from multiple Air Traffic Control Radars and the impact in hourly HIRLAM

Fundamentals of Climate Change (PCC 587): Water Vapor

High-resolution Regional Reanalyses for Europe and Germany

Cloud-Resolving Simulations of Convection during DYNAMO

Diurnal Cycle of Convection at the ARM SGP Site: Role of Large-Scale Forcing, Surface Fluxes, and Convective Inhibition

Analysis of Climatic and Environmental Changes Using CLEARS Web-GIS Information-Computational System: Siberia Case Study

Satellite Products and Dissemination: Visualization and Data Access

Estimating Firn Emissivity, from 1994 to1998, at the Ski Hi Automatic Weather Station on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Using Passive Microwave Data

The Ideal Gas Law. Gas Constant. Applications of the Gas law. P = ρ R T. Lecture 2: Atmospheric Thermodynamics

1. a. Surface Forecast Charts (USA and Ontario and Quebec)

Launch-Ready Operations Code Chain ESDT ShortNames, LongNames, and Generating PGE or Ingest Source

Limitations of Equilibrium Or: What if τ LS τ adj?

Estimation of satellite observations bias correction for limited area model

Next generation models at MeteoSwiss: communication challenges

A system of direct radiation forecasting based on numerical weather predictions, satellite image and machine learning.

Wind resources map of Spain at mesoscale. Methodology and validation

Analysis of Cloud Variability and Sampling Errors in Surface and Satellite Measurements

Cloud Model Verification at the Air Force Weather Agency

7B.2 MODELING THE EFFECT OF VERTICAL WIND SHEAR ON TROPICAL CYCLONE SIZE AND STRUCTURE

Atmospheric kinetic energy spectra from high-resolution GEM models

Big Data at ECMWF Providing access to multi-petabyte datasets Past, present and future

NCDC Strategic Vision

David P. Ruth* Meteorological Development Laboratory Office of Science and Technology National Weather Service, NOAA Silver Spring, Maryland

SPARC Data Center. Peter Love Marvin Geller Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary Atmospheres Stony Brook University

Traffic Management Systems with Air Quality Monitoring Feedback. Phil Govier City & County of Swansea

Developing sub-domain verification methods based on Geographic Information System (GIS) tools

13.2 THE INTEGRATED DATA VIEWER A WEB-ENABLED APPLICATION FOR SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS AND VISUALIZATION

Climatology and Monitoring of Dust and Sand Storms in the Arabian Peninsula

Tropical Cyclogenesis Monitoring at RSMC Tokyo Mikio, Ueno Forecaster, Tokyo Typhoon Center Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)

RADIATION IN THE TROPICAL ATMOSPHERE and the SAHEL SURFACE HEAT BALANCE. Peter J. Lamb. Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies

MARS. Introduction and basic concepts

Comparing TIGGE multi-model forecasts with. reforecast-calibrated ECMWF ensemble forecasts

Tutorial #2 Tracers. LMDZ team December 12, Setting up a case with a zoomed grid 1

NCDC s SATELLITE DATA, PRODUCTS, and SERVICES

How does snow melt? Principles of snow melt. Energy balance. GEO4430 snow hydrology Energy flux onto a unit surface:

MI oceanographic data

Comparison of the Vertical Velocity used to Calculate the Cloud Droplet Number Concentration in a Cloud-Resolving and a Global Climate Model

The THREDDS Data Repository: for Long Term Data Storage and Access

Coupling micro-scale CFD simulations to meso-scale models

Number of activated CCN as a key property in cloud-aerosol interactions. Or, More on simplicity in complex systems

Monsoon Variability and Extreme Weather Events

Environmental Data Services for Delaware:

What the Heck are Low-Cloud Feedbacks? Takanobu Yamaguchi Rachel R. McCrary Anna B. Harper

Transcription:

A Description of the 2nd Generation NOAA Global Ensemble Reforecast Data Set Table of contents: produced by the NOAA Earth System Research Lab, Physical Sciences Division Boulder, Colorado USA under a US Department of Energy supercomputer grant. contributors: Tom Hamill, Gary Bates, Jeff Whitaker, Don Murray, Mike Fiorino, Tom Galarneau Updated: 18 April 2016 1. Overview 2. A description of the model 3. Methods for accessing the reforecast data 4. Frequently asked questions 1. Overview. NOAA scientists have developed a reforecast data set that is approximately statistically consistent with the currently operational NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS). This comes thanks to a US Department of Energy grant (to facilitate the development of renewable energy forecast products for week +2 forecast leads). The reforecast data set may be useful for a number of applications, such as statistical post processing, diagnosis of how well the model may forecast a phenomenon, and the initialization of regional model reforecasts. This README file provides some basic information about the data set, presuming you want to download and use the data. Please read this README file before contacting us with questions. If you do have questions that can t be answered by this document, please send them to esrl.psd.reforecast2@noaa.gov.

Please note in your message that this question concerns the 2nd generation GEFS reforecasts. We currently have two sites for accessing the data: (a) A fast access site from NOAA s Earth System Research Lab, where you can download user specified fields for specific lead times, dates, even years, and retrieve them relatively quickly (quickly is relative; it may take hours or days to fully process the data if you re retrieving data spread over many decades). This is the site to go to if you need data for many cases at once. We offer direct ftp to this site as well as a web interface. (b) A full model archive site. This is useful if you need one or a few days of the full model output at high vertical resolution. Users may choose to access this, for example, in order to provide the initial and lateral boundary conditions to run a regional reforecast. Turnaround time getting the data off the mass store is typically ~ 1 day. 2. A description of the model and the reforecast data set. The operational configuration of the NCEP GEFS changed as of 12 UTC 14 February 2012. The current real time and reforecast model both use version 9.0.1 of the GEFS, discussed at http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gfs/impl.php. During the first eight days of the operational GEFS forecast and the reforecast, the model is run at T254L42 resolution, which with a Gaussian grid is an equivalent grid spacing of approximately 40 km at 40 latitude, and 42 vertical levels. Starting at day +7.5, the forecasts are integrated at T190L42, or approximately 54 km at 40 latitude, and data is saved at this resolution from days +8 to days +16, the end of the GEFS integration period. Through 20 Feb 2011, control initial conditions were generated by the the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis, or CFSR (Saha et al. 2010). This used the Grid Point Statistical Interpolation (GSI) System of Kleist et al. (2009) at T382L64. From 20 Feb 2011 through May 2012, initial conditions were taken from the operational GSI analysis, internally computed at T574L64. After 22 May 2012, the GSI was upgraded to use a hybrid ensemble Kalman filter variational analysis system (Hamill et al. 2011). As discussed in the journal article, this data set is generally statistically consistent with the operational 00 UTC run of the GEFS. However, due to recent changes in the data assimilation procedure and the changes in the observing network over time, more recent forecasts are generally more accurate than older forecasts. The perturbed initial conditions for both the operational GEFS and the reforecast use the ensemble transform technique with rescaling, or ETR (Wei et al. 2008). For the real time forecasts, 81 members are cycled for purposes of generating the initial condition perturbations. However, only the leading 20 perturbations plus the control initial condition were used to initialize the operational medium range forecasts. The operational medium range GEFS forecasts are generated every six hours from 00, 06, 12, and 18 UTC initial conditions. In

comparison, the reforecast was generated only once daily, at 00 UTC, and only 10 perturbed forecast members and the one control forecast were generated. However, the six hourly cycling was preserved, though this cycling used only the 10 perturbed members rather than the 80 used in real time. Model uncertainty in the GEFS is estimated with the stochastic tendencies following Hou et al. (2008) for both operations and reforecasts. Here are some details on the reforecast data that is available. 28+ years (Dec 1984 present) of once daily reforecast data are currently archived. Real time ensemble forecast data for the operational 00 UTC run is available with some delay (by 15 UTC) from the archive, though it will be available more quickly via NOMADS, the NOAA/National Model Archive and Distribution System (nomads.ncdc.noaa.gov). 99 different forecast global fields are available at 1 degree resolution, and 28 selected fields are also available at the native resolution (~0.5 degree resolution on a Gaussian grid for the first week s forecasts, and ~0.67 degree resolution for the second week s forecasts). Data is internally archived in GRIB2 format. ( http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/docs/grib2/ ). The 1 degree data was created from the native resolution data via bilinear interpolation using wgrib2 software ( http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/wesley/wgrib2/ ). The listing of the fields that were saved and their resolutions are provided in Tables 1 and 2. Reforecast data was saved at 3 hourly intervals from 0 to 72 h, and every 6 h thereafter. With 29 years of data daily currently archived (1985 2014), this totals approximately 130 TB of internal storage. 3. Methods for accessing the reforecast data. Reforecast data can be accessed in many different ways. For users who want a few select fields (say, precipitation forecasts) spanning many days, months, or years, we provide a web interface for accessing such data. The URL is http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/forecasts/reforecast2/download.html. The interface allows the user to select particular fields, date ranges, domains, and type of ensemble information (particular members, the mean, or the spread). While data is internally archived in GRIB2 format, the synthesized files produced from the web form are in netcdf, version 3 or 4 format ( http://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/ ). We also provide an ftp site with access to fields of GRIB2 data as well as tropical cyclone information. The data can be accessed via anonymous FTP at ftp://ftp.cdc.noaa.gov/projects/reforecast2. There is a lot of reforecast data, so we request that users be conservative with their downloads in order to minimize computations and bandwidth; take no more than you really need. There are wgrib2 inventory files (.inv) for each of the GRIB2 files. These can be used for subsetting the data in each file as described at http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/wesley/fast_downloading_grib.html. The files can be accessed under http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/forecasts/reforecast2/data/ for this purpose. If you are not subsetting the data, please use the FTP link. Tropical cyclone information is available under ftp://ftp.cdc.noaa.gov/projects/reforecast2/tropicalcyclone. See the README file in this directory for more information about data formats, directory structures, and such.

Some users may desire only selected days of reforecasts but want full model output rather than the limited set of fields and levels available from ESRL. In this case, the user can download this data from the tape archive at the US Department of Energy. The web form for this is at http://portal.nersc.gov/project/refcst/v2/. Such full data may be useful for, say, initializing regional reforecasts. 4. Frequently asked questions : a. Your web form produces only netcdf format output. I prefer the data in grib format. Can you provide that to us? Answer: at this point, if you want grib data, you will need to write scripts that download this data directly from the ftp site, ftp://ftp.cdc.noaa.gov/projects/reforecast2. Our web form will not produce that currently. b. What is the directory structure for the reforecast data? Under the /Projects/Reforecast2/ directory on the ftp site, the data is organized by: Year (YYYY) Year and month (YYYYMM) Year, month, day, and hour (YYYYMMDDHH) Member (c00, p01 to p10, mean, and sprd) Grid type (original resolution gaussian or 1 deg. latlon ) file (var_lev_yyyymmddhh_ens(_t190).grib2 c. What do the file names mean? Data is organized by variable, so all accumulated precipitation forecasts across the various lead times, for example, will be in files with names like apcp_sfc_yyyymmddhh_c00.grib2. Here the c00 indicates that this is the control perturbation (p01 would be in its own directory). For some variables, like mandatory level wind data, the data from multiple levels are combined into a single file, e.g., vgrd_pres_yyyymmddhh_c00.grib2 for v wind components on the mandatory levels. See the tables below for information on the prefix (var_lev) used for each variable. If you list the directory contents, you will see there are.grib2 files and _t190.grib2 files. The former are for the week +1 forecasts, the latter are for the week +2 forecasts. There are also filenames with suffixes like.pyidx This is a pygrib index file, useful if you are reading in the grib data via python pygrib module. The.inv files are also grib index files, meant for use if you are processing the data with wgrib2 software. d. What verification data do you have archived? Aside from the 00 UTC initial conditions, none. We expect that you will obtain verification data that is of interest to you from other sites. e. Is there any specific tips on how to use the GEFS full model output for initializing the WRF ARW regional model? In order to use the GEFS full model output as initial and boundary conditions for WRF ARW, the proper Vtable file must be created prior to preprocessing the

GEFS reforecast data. To do this, copy Vtable.GFS to your working directory for preprocessing the GRIB2 GEFS reforecast data. Rename the Vtable.GFS file as Vtable.reforecast, and modify the file as follows. First, add a line for specific humidity on pressure levels and at 2 m. The specifications for specific humidity should be as follows: metgrid Description: Specific Humidity metgrid units: kg kg 1 metgrid Name: SPECHUMD GRIB2 Discp=0, Catgy=1, Param=0, Level=100 GRIB1 Param=51, Level Type=100, From Level1=* metgrid Description: Specific Humidity at 2 m metgrid units: kg kg 1 metgrid Name: SPECHUMD GRIB2 Discp=0, Catgy=1, Param=0, Level=103 GRIB1 Param=51, Level Type=105, From Level1=2 Second, remove the GRIB2 parameter number for relative humidity on pressure levels and at 2 m. Note that ungrib.exe and metgrid.exe will calculate relative humidity for you if you have specific humidity. Finally, change the GRIB2 parameter number for PMSL from 1 to 0. No other known modifications to the Vtable are needed. Now that the Vtable.reforecast file is properly created, follow the instructions for running WRF ARW on the WRF Users Page [ http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/ ]. John Lawson at the University of Utah shared his experience for running WRF from the GEFS. He found an additional complication, namely, that only one level of soil moisture and temperature is available in the GEFS Reforecast archives, and proposed a workaround. f. Is there any missing data? Data is being added to the archive in real time and at most should be 1 or 2 days behind the current date. The archive is thought to be complete. If you find any other missing or incorrect data, please send a message to esrl.psd.reforecast2@noaa.gov and let us know. g. Can you supply us with sample code for reading in the data? We envision lots of different users will read it in using many different programs and languages, and we can t provide examples for all of them. Regrettably, we hope and trust that you can work out on your own how to read in the netcdf or grib files using the standard programs and libraries that you can find on the internet. Software that has previously worked to read, process, and/or display grib and/or netcdf data includes wgrib2, IDV, GrADS, NCL, and python (with pynio or netcdf4 python/pygrib ), Panoply. We don t support these software ourselves. h. How should I cite the usage of this data? Please refer to this data as being from NOAA s 2nd generation global ensemble reforecast dataset and cite the Hamill et al. (2013) Bulletin of

the American Meteorological Society article as follows: Hamill, T. M., G.T. Bates, J. S. Whitaker, D. R. Murray, M. Fiorino, T. J. Galarneau, Y. Zhu, and W. Lapenta, 2013: NOAA s Second Generation Global Medium Range Ensemble Forecast Dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 1553 1565. i. What are the hybrid levels that I see on the download site? The GEFS uses a hybridized sigma pressure coordinate system; near the ground the coordinates are much like sigma vertical coordinates, near the model top they are more like pressure coordinates. For applications such as wind energy, there may be a desire to access model data at vertical levels near the ground. We provide data on the lowest four model levels above the ground for this purpose. With minimal approximation, you can treat them as if they were sigma coordinate levels. j. How are the mean and spread calculated? The mean and spread were calculated from the 11 ensemble members (1 control + 10 perturbations). You may see some precision differences between the values in the grib and netcdf files compared to your own calculations. The difference arise from the decreased storage precision of the GRIB files in some cases. For example, temperature on pressure levels is only stored to.1 degrees in GRIB, but your calculations might be done with higher precision.

References : Hamill, T. M., J. S. Whitaker, D. T. Kleist, M. Fiorino, and S. G. Benjamin, 2011b: Predictions of 2010 s Tropical Cyclones Using the GFS and Ensemble Based Data Assimilation Methods. Mon. Wea. Rev., 139, 3243 3247. Hamill, T. M., G.T. Bates, J. S. Whitaker, D. R. Murray, M. Fiorino, T. J. Galarneau, Y. Zhu, and W. Lapenta, 2013: NOAA s Second Generation Global Medium Range Ensemble Forecast Dataset. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 94, 1553 1565. Hou, D., Z. Toth, Y. Zhu, and Y. Yang, 2008: Impact of a Stochastic Perturbation Scheme on NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast System. Proceedings, 19th AMS conference on Probability and Statistics. New Orleans, LA, 20 24 Jan. 2008. Kleist, D. T., D. F. Parrish, J. C. Derber, R. Treadon, W. S. Wu, and S. Lord, 2009: Introduction of the GSI into the NCEP Global Data Assimilation System. Weather and Forecasting, 24, 1691 1705. Saha, S., and Coauthors, 2010: The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis. Bull. of the Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, 1015 1057. Wei, M., Z. Toth, R. Wobus, and Y. Zhu, 2008: Initial perturbations based on the ensemble transform (ET) technique in the NCEP global operational forecast system. Tellus A, 60, 62 79.

Table 1: Reforecast variables available for selected mandatory and other vertical levels. F indicates geopotential height, and an X indicates that this variable is available from the reforecast data set at 1 degree resolution; a Y indicates that the variable is available at the native ~0.5 degree resolution. Vertical Level U V T F q File prefix ugrd_pres vgrd_pres tmp_pres hgt_pres spfh_pres 10 hpa X X X X 50 hpa X X X X 100 hpa X X X X 200 hpa X X X X 250 hpa X X X X 300 hpa X X X X X 500 hpa X X X X X 700 hpa X X X X X 850 hpa X X X X X 925 hpa X X X X X 1000 hpa X X X X X File prefix ugrd_hybr vgrd_hybr hgt_hybr σ @ 0.996 X X X σ @ 0.987 X X X σ @ 0.977 X X X σ @ 0.965 X X X

Table 2 : Single level reforecast variables archived (and their units). All variables are available on the 1 degree grid. Where an [Y] is displayed, this indicates that this variable is available at the native ~0.5 degree resolution as well. Variable (units) Mean sea level pressure (Pa) [Y] File Prefix pres_msl Skin temperature (K) [Y] tmp_sfc Soil temperature, 0.0 to 0.1 m depth (K) [Y] Volumetric soil moisture content 0.0 to 0.1 m depth (fraction between wilting and saturation) [Y] Water equivalent of accumulated snow depth (kg m 2, i.e., mm) [Y] 2 meter temperature (K) [Y] 2 meter specific humidity (kg kg 1 dry air) [Y] Maximum temperature (K) in last 6 h period (00, 06, 12, 18 UTC) or in last 3 h period (03, 09, 15, 21 UTC) [Y] Minimum temperature (K) in last 6 h period (00, 06, 12, 18 UTC) or in last 3 h period (03, 09, 15, 21 UTC) [Y] tmp_bgrnd soilw_bgrnd weasd_sfc tmp_2m spfh_2m tmax_2m tmin_2m 10 m u wind component (ms 1) [Y] ugrd_10m 10 m v wind component (ms 1) [Y] vgrd_10m Total precipitation (kg m 2, i.e., mm) in last 6 h period (00, 06, 12, 18 UTC) or in last 3 h period (03, 09, 15, 21 UTC) [Y] Water runoff (kg m 2, i.e., mm) [Y] Average surface latent heat net flux (W m 2) [Y] Average sensible heat net flux (W m 2) [Y] Average ground heat net flux (W m 2) [Y] Sunshine (units?) Convective available potential energy (J kg 1) [Y] Convective inhibition (J kg 1) [Y] Precipitable water (kg m 2, i.e., mm) [Y] apcp_sfc watr_sfc lhtfl_sfc shtfl_sfc gflux_sfc suns_sfc cape_sfc cin_sfc pwat_eatm

Total column integrated condensate (kg m 2, i.e., mm) [Y] Total cloud cover (%) Downward short wave radiation flux at the surface (W m 2) [Y] Downward long wave radiation flux at the surface (W m 2) [Y] Upward short wave radiation flux at the surface (W m 2) [Y] Upward long wave radiation flux at the surface (W m 2) [Y] Upward long wave radiation flux at the top of the atmosphere (W m 2) [Y] Potential vorticity on q = 320K isentropic surface (K m2 kg 1 s 1) U component on 2 PVU (1 PVU = 1 K m2 kg 1 s 1) isentropic surface (ms 1) V component on 2 PVU isentropic surface (ms 1) Temperature on 2 PVU isentropic surface (K) Pressure on 2 PVU isentropic surface (Pa) tcolc_eatm tcdc_eatm dswrf_sfc dlwrf_sfc uswrf_sfc ulwrf_sfc ulwrf_tatm pvort_isen ugrd_pvor vgrd_pvor tmp_pvor pres_pvor 80 m u wind component (ms 1) [Y] ugrd_80m 80 m v wind component (ms 1) [Y] vgrd_80m 80 m wind power [Y] wmixe_80m Vertical velocity at 850 hpa (Pa s 1) Surface Pressure (Pa) vvel_850 pres_sfc