How to Fix Any Earthquake in America

Similar documents
Prepared For San Francisco Community College District 33 Gough Street San Francisco, California Prepared By

Retrofitting in the Central US: A Federal Perspective

SINGLE-FAMILY EARTHQUAKE (SEISMIC) RETROFITS

Elevating Your House. Introduction CHAPTER 5

STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT REPORT BOLINAS MARINE STATION - BOLINAS, CALIFORNIA

Page & Turnbull imagining change in historic environments through design, research, and technology

Foundations 65 5 FOUNDATIONS. by Richard Chylinski, FAIA and Timothy P. McCormick, P.E. Seismic Retrofit Training

Chapter 6 ROOF-CEILING SYSTEMS

inimi ing damage and repair osts to manufa tured omes during an eart ua e

SECTION 3 ONM & J STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Repair of Earthquake-Damaged Masonry Fireplace Chimneys SOUTH NAPA EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY ADVISORY

Welcome. Your Success is CWP Success.

Appendix A: ATC 110 Management Plan

Chapter 3 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FEATURES IMPORTANT TO SEISMIC PERFORMANCE

EARTHQUAKE HAZARD - DISTRICT 3

When is a Permit Required? What Types of Permits are Required? The most common types of projects that require permits are:

GEOVERA INSURANCE COMPANY RESIDENTIAL EARTHQUAKE

BARRISH PELHAM & ASSOCIATES, Inc.

FOUNDATION TECHNICAL CATEGORY 3 (TC3) AUGUST 2012

Project Report. Structural Investigations Hotel del Sol Yuma, Arizona

Residential Sheltering: In-Residence and Stand-Alone Shelters

Patio Covers / Carports

REV GENERAL. All instructions of this Handbook apply to rehabilitation projects unless modified by this Chapter.

T H E G R EA T C A L IF O R N IA S H A K E O U T O C TO B E R 21, 201 0

Smart Home America. Smarter, Safer, more Resilient Communities for all Americans

RESIDENTIAL PHOTOVOLTAIC SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

14 September Sarah Zorn Planning and Economic Development 25 West Fourth Street, Ste St. Paul, MN 55102

POST AND FRAME STRUCTURES (Pole Barns)

ENGINEERED FOUNDATIONS. Department of Public Works Jeff Hill, PE

A Solid Foundation Solution for Homeowners. from. Our products are made with 90% Recycled Material Down. Right. Solid. GREEN.

Guide to Safe Building Practices

HOW TO EVALUATE BUILDINGS AND DETERMINE RETROFIT COSTS

Civil Engineering and Architecture (CEA) Detailed Outline

Developing, Validating and Demonstrating Ways to Reduce Property Damage from Natural Hazards

HOW METAL BUILDING INSURANCE COSTS COMPARE TO OTHER BUILDING TYPES

Residential Building Permit Process

6 RETROFITTING POST & PIER HOUSES

Soil and Materials Engineers, Inc. Mark J. Quimby Project Consultant

Sanitary Sewer Smoke Testing

Walls. Add Strength and Water Resistance When Repairing Your. Replace damaged framing members when walls are open

Chapter 3 Pre-Installation, Foundations and Piers

Re: Damages to Alaska Building from Legislative Information Office Construction

Between a Subduction Zone and a Hard Spot!

Timber Frame Construction

Building Condition Assessment: West Lexington Street Baltimore, Maryland

Building Permit Application Packet. BUILDING CODES Adopted by La Plata County For Enforcement In The Unincorporated Areas Of La Plata County

Current Status of Seismic Retrofitting Technology

New construction Repairing failed or old foundations Retrofit foundations Permanent battered piers Machinery/equipment foundations

Personal Information. Professional Education

Earthquakes and Data Centers

Building Construction. Lightweight construction. Conventional Construction

Impact of Katrina on U.S. Housing Markets: Building Codes Change in Response to Catastrophic Risk

Status of Building Codes in New Jersey and New York: The Future of Resilience in a Post-Sandy Environment

Baton Rouge Foundation Repair

TOWN OF WOODSIDE. Report to Town Council Agenda Item 7 From: Joanne Kurz, Building Official January 26, 2016 Approved by: Kevin Bryant, Town Manager

Property Inspection. 83A Ascot Avenue North New Brighton Christchurch STRUCTURAL REPORT

SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF STRUCTURES

Building Condition Assessment: North Howard Street Baltimore, Maryland

Text Box 1 Important Actions, Questions and Constraints to Consider on Standards and Vulnerability

What is Seismic Retrofitting?

Development of National Geotechnical Management System Standards for Transportation Applications

TechPractices: Home Front Homes:

Critical Facility Round Table

Building Technology Transfer Meetings: A Collaborative Model for Transferring DOE Research Results to Potential Users

Steve Brinkman Alain Pinel Realtors 167 S San Antonio Road Los Altos, CA RE: Foundation Inspection for 162 Del Monte Ave. Los Altos, CA 94022

Structural Engineering: Assurance for Your Insurance

Residential Deck Safety, Construction, and Repair

General Approach. Structure Components. Is all lumber the same? Lumber Grades. Rafters Girders / Beams Columns. Sketch general structural layout

Residential Warranties. Contractor s Obligations Under Oregon Law Effective July 1, 2008

D Sample Notices to Property Owners, Sample Affidavits, and Other Material

Market Potential Study for Water Heater Demand Management

Table 1: Prescriptive Envelope Requirements: Residential WOOD FRAME WALL R-VALUE MASS WALL R-VALUE CEILING R-VALUE

DIVISION V DWELLING PROGRAM. A. DWELLING ELIGIBILITY -- Risks eligible for the dwelling program are used solely for residential purposes.

Earthquake. Insurance. California Department of Insurance

Maintenance Matters. Window and Door Replacement

Regional and Site Assumptions This document is based on the following regional and site assumptions:

Protecting Your Home From Hurricane Wind Damage

Beginning on Friday, Jan 22, and on subsequent investigations, the following issues were identified:

TRAINING OUTLINE FOR PART TIME BUILDERS

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO

Making Your Home Ready For Solar Water Heating

EXHIBIT D NOTICE. Personal and Commercial Residential Property Insurance. Policies; Extension of Coverage for Damaged Property

ESSENTIAL CURRICULUM ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ACADEMY

HomeGuard. Incorporated. Home Inspection Report Park Estates Way, San Jose. Ordered by: Inspected by:

2. What building projects are exempted? (permit not required)

2D and 3D Framing and Detailing in Chief Architect X4 Dan Baumann, ChiefExperts.com

Fire Following Earthquake:

EARTHQUAKE HOME RETROFIT HANDBOOK HOW TO COMPLETE THE HOME ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

Build Back Smarter: House performance improvements at the time of earthquake repairs

Commercial Roof Management

Solar Panel Installations

Solar Water Heating and Solar Electric Generators Installed on One or Two Family Dwellings

Guernsey s Structural Engineering Experience

HOMEOWNER S GUIDE. to LANDSLIDES. and MITIGATION RECOGNITION, PREVENTION, CONTROL, Compiled by Dr. Scott F. Burns Tessa M. Harden Carin J.

HURRICANE MITIGATION RETROFITS FOR EXISTING SITE-BUILT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES

MANUFACTURED HOUSING USED AS DWELLINGS

October 30, Mr. & Mrs. Daniel Vick 101 Southwind Cove Benton, AR. Report of Findings, Structural Investigation, Benton, Arkansas, Dear Mr.

Foundation Experts, LLC Specializes in Foundation Repair and Waterproofing

Expected Performance Rating System

Energy Company Obligation (ECO): Technical Monitoring Questions

Transcription:

FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT AWARD NO: 00HQGR0008 Recipient Name: PI Name: Title of Recipient s Application: The University of Memphis, Center for Earthquake Research and Information Gary Patterson Strategies for Mid America Residential Retrofit Program Element: Education and Outreach 1

ABSTRACT FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT AWARD NO: 00HQGR0008 Strategies for Mid America Residential Retrofit GaryPatterson CenterforEarthquakeResearchandInformation TheUniversityofMemphis Memphis,TN38152 Tel:901 678 5264 Fax:901 678 4734 E mail:glpttrsn@memphis.edu www.ceri.memphis.edu Central US seismic hazard has been a research focus of the National EarthquakeHazardReductionPlanformanyyears.Significantadvanceshavebeen made to better understand geotechnical, geophysical, and seismological characteristics that influence losses related to damaging earthquakes in the New Madrid,Wabash,andEastTennesseeseismiczones,butawarenesslagsbehinddue toapaucityofdamagingeventsinthelast200years.somecentralusstates,such astennessee,haverecentlyadoptedseismicbuildingcodes,butthevastmajorityof residential structures in the Central and Eastern U.S. were not designed to resist significant horizontal forces from wind or earthquake. Earthquake retrofit guidelines for residential structures, considering many different construction methods,havebeendevelopedanddistributedinthewesternunitedstateswhere earthquakes occur more frequently, but little retrofit information has been developedwithinthecontextofcentralu.s.seismichazardtoallowhomeownersto make cost beneficial decisions. This project provides a system of information transfertoaddressthisneed.asignificantoutcomeofthisprojectisidentificationof specific differences in historical residential construction methods between the Eastern US and the Western U.S., which significantly impacts our ability to apply previously developed retrofit standards uniformly across the nation, especially for pre1940 sstructures. 2

INTRODUCTION Earthquakeretrofitstandardshavebeendevelopedandrefinedinthe western U.S. as a result of frequent damaging earthquakes with the proactive supportoflocal,state,andfederalgovernmentincollaborationwithprivate sector interestsandacademia.thisproject,strategiesformidamericaresidentialretrofit (SMARRT), provides comprehensive retrofit information within the context of Central US earthquake hazard to allow homeowners the ability to weigh retrofit costsagainsttherisksassociatedwithregionalseismicsources.smarrtisasystem of information transfer that provides proven retrofit strategies related to many different modern and historical construction styles that is accessible from a single source.thesystemincludesseveralelements:ahighqualitytradeshowdisplayto educate Central U.S. contractors and homebuilders; a website with comprehensive information based on experience data, and; hardcopy brochures to guide users to thesmarrtwebsite. Costbenefitandseismicretrofitinareasofinfrequentseismicity Residential seismic retrofit primarily entails structural modifications to provide a continuous load path throughout the structure and non structural modifications to strengthen other heavy components that could cause loss of life and significant property damage. Structural modifications call for strengthening connections between the foundation and the load bearing walls, the walls and the ceiling joists and/or rafters, installation of collar beams to prevent roof peak separation, and strengthening walls and corners near large openings. Non 3

structuralmodificationsstrengthenheavyunreinforcedelements,suchaschimneys and water heaters. Unless the homeowner s perception of risk merits it, or major remodelingupgradesarealsoplannedintandem,completeseismicretrofitmaynot costeffectiveinareasofinfrequentseismicity,andinsomecasesmayapproachthe totalvalueofthestructure.however;insomecasesalimitedretrofitstrategycanbe appliedtoaddressthemostcommonorexpensivepotentialdamagesbasedonthe specificconstructionmethodsusedinanygivenresidentialstructure. Importantprojectcollaborations:EastmeetsWest ThePIfortheprojectinitiallycollaboratedwiththeUniversityofWashington and the Seattle Project Impact Team, which had implemented a comprehensive program to train homeowners and contractors to cost effectively retrofit homes. The PI attended Home Retrofit classes organized by the Seattle Project Impact Team, which had already considered and integrated the most prominent retrofit guidesfromcalifornia.seattle shomeretrofitprojectalsodevelopedaprocessthat allowshomeownerstounderstandiftheirhome,basedonitsconstructionmethod, could be retrofitted economically. The classes were sponsored by the Simpson StrongTiecompany,amajormanufacturerofseismic/windretrofitcomponentsin the U.S., and State Farm Insurance with significant logistical support from the University of Washington and community outreach elements of the Pacific Northwest Seismology Lab(Bill Steele). This was a unique opportunity to discuss retrofit strategies with a well informed multidisciplinary group of researchers, urbanplanners,andpubliccommunicationsspecialists. 4

The PI also met with the Director of Engineering and Vice President of the Institute for Business and Home Safety, Tim Reinhold, on several occasions to discussvariousretrofitandnewconstructionsafetyprogramsastheyrelatedtothis NEHRP project. As a result of this collaboration, the PI has been invited to present results from this NEHRP project as a panelist and speaker at the National IBHS ConferenceonNovember13and14,2008inTampaFlorida.AssuggestedbyDavid Applegate,thePIalsocollaboratedwiththeUSGS,FederalEmergencyManagement Agency,TheWesternStatesSeismicPolicyCouncil,TheConsortiumofUniversities for Research in Earthquake Engineering, The Southern California Earthquake Consortium, and other members of the Earthquake Country Alliance to better integrate new retrofit information from California. Publications from these organizationsaredownloadablefromtheprojectwebsite. CHALLENGES,PROJECTDEVELOPMENT,ANDPRODUCTS The PI for SMARRT was uniquely suited to address this project with a backgroundinseismichazardassessment,geology,centralusseismichazard,and former residential remodeling contractor in Memphis, Tennessee. The primary sourceofinformationfordeterminingthevulnerabilityofresidentialstructuresto earthquake damage was Earthquake Losses to Single Family Dwellings: California Experience, US Geological Survey Bulletin 1939 A, 1990. Although site specific geologiceffectsandproximitytoprimaryfaultfacerupturewerenotdifferentiated fromdamageduetostronggroundmotioninthisbulletin,thedocumentprovidesa 5

comprehensive look at residential losses resulting from earthquakes that have occurredinthewesternu.s.since1971. BasicdifferencesinconstructionpracticesbetweentheEastandWest Manydifferentresidentialconstructionstyleshaveevolvedoverthelast200 yearsintheussuchasunreinforcedmasonry,solid pourconventionalfoundation, postandbeamconventionalfoundations,cinderblockconventionalfoundation,slab construction,etc.eachofthesemethodsisuniquewithrespecttohorizontalforce resistance;thereforethereisnosingleretrofitstrategythatwillworkforallhomes. Additionally, each structure s actual exposure to earthquake losses is variable and each homeowner has different perceptions of the risk and different levels of disposable income. Therefore, the cost beneficial nature of retrofitting residential structurestomitigateearthquakedamageisapersonaldecisionandiscomplicated by numerous retrofit applications and construction styles noted above. It was a challengetoaddresstheseimportantdifferencesthroughcollaborationwithnehrp tomodifytheprojectscopetoappropriatelyaddressthestatedgoals. It became apparent in the initial phases of the project that a significant amount of the retrofit information had been developed in the western U.S. to addresscertainresidentialconstructionstylesthatarerarelyutilizedinthecentral U.S. Many of the pre 1940 wood frame residential structures in California utilize postandbeamfoundationswithexteriorknee wallsextendingfromthefoundation footingtothebaseplateofthefirststorywall.foundationswithkneewalls(also knownas ponywalls or cripplewalls )provideasignificantweaknessatthebase 6

ofthestructurethatisverysusceptibletodamagefromearthquakesandhasbeena majorfocusofwesternu.s.retrofitmanuals.thepresenceofkneewallfoundations does not necessarily cause total collapse but the cost of repairs can be very high because water, sewer and electrical connections are easily broken and the home mustbeliftedandplacedbackontherepairedfoundation.perhapsoneofthemost importantfindingsofthethisprojectisthatpre 1940homesintheCentralU.S.with conventionalfoundationswerecommonlyconstructedwithamonolithic,sold pour concretefootingwallwithnocripplewalls.asidentifiedbyseattle shomeretrofit Project, these types of structures can be retrofitted economically to address the mostcommontypeofearthquakedamage.ofcourseitispreferabletoretrofitall joints that provide continuous load path (footing to foundation, walls to ceiling joists,roofpeak,etc)butaddressingweakconnectionsatthefoundation/sillplate levelcanpreventcostlyrepairsduetoashiftofafewinchesoffthefoundation. ComprehensiveinformationviatheInternet Astheprojectdevelopeditalsobecameapparentthatcomprehensiveretrofit information addressing various construction styles would call for transfer of hundreds of pages of information to users spread out over the entire Central U.S. The project evolved to address these constraints through the development of a Residential Retrofit Info website at http://itmattersareyouprepared.org/residentialretrofitinfo.html and supplemented withabrochuretointroducetheprojectconceptandguideuserstointernet based information. The project website contains links to CERI information pages and 7

downloadable retrofit information products to provide background on earthquake hazardinthecentralu.s. The following retrofit documents are downloadable from the SMARRT project website,residentialretrofitinfo: EarthquakeHazardintheHeartoftheHomeland.USGeologicalSurveyFactsheet Putting Down Roots in Earthquake Country. The Southern California Earthquake CenterandtheEarthquakeCountryConsortium 8

SeattleProjectImpactHomeRetrofitSeriesOverviewandRetrofitDefinitions.Seattle ProjectImpactConsortium Guide to Completing the Home Assessment Checklist. Home Earthquake Retrofit Series,SeattleProjectImpactConsortium Guide to Completing an Earthquake Retrofit Plan for Wood Frame Residential Buildings.SeattleProjectImpactPermittingandStandardsCommittee BracingfortheBigOne:RetrofitGuideforHistoricHomes.UtahDepartmentofState History How the City of San Leandro can help you strengthen your home for the next big earthquakeinthebayarea,prescriptiveseismicstrengtheningplanforlightwood FrameResidentialStructures.CityofSanLeandro,California Homebuilder s Guide to Earthquake Resistant Design and Construction, Federal EmergencyManagementAgencyDocument232 EarthquakeHomeHazardHuntPoster,FEMAandNEHRP DigitalVideoShakeTableDemonstrations: Large ScaleShakeTableTestingofWoodFrameResidentialStructuresandContents, Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering (CUREE) CaltechWoodFrameProject.(Multipleviews) Virtual Building Retrofit Demonstration, Brad Cross and Scott Smith, Southern IllinoisUniversityatEdwardsville. Retrofitvisualization Another phase of the original project was to interactively demonstrate retrofit measures that specifically address pre 1940 construction methods in the Central U.S. The PI collaborated with the Electrical Engineering Department of the University of Southern Illinois at Edwardsville (Brad Cross and Scott Smith) to 9

produce a digital visualization of the retrofit process for solid pour conventional foundationresidentialstructures(includingchimneyandwaterheaterretrofit)that is displayed on the project website. The visualization is part of a larger Virtual RealityModelingLanguage(VRML)projectfundedbytheMidAmericaEarthquake Centerthatinteractivelyallowsuserstogenerateearthquakesofvarioussizesand testdifferentretrofitstrategies.unfortunatelythevrmlhasbeenchangedto X3d format, which could not be integrated as an online, interactive visualization tool withoutsignificantadditionalresources.however,thepicontinuestocollaborate withsiuedwardsvilletoformulatefutureapplications. SMARRTtradeshowdisplayandbrochure 10

The SMARRT tradeshow display increases awareness of retrofit options to homeowners, homebuilders, and insurers within the context of Central US earthquake hazards. The project brochure utilizes the same information and artwork to guide users to products on the project website. The PI will exhibit SMARRTmaterialsatthe2008NationalConferenceoftheInstituteforBusinessand and Home Safety at the request and expense of IBHS. This recognition of the importance of the project by IBHS represents a capstone for the effort and acknowledgementofnehrpoutreachproducts. 11