Comment Invited on Proposal to Protect the Bristol Bay Watershed

Similar documents
Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME DIVISION OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES NEWS RELEASE

National Environmental Policy Act and Permitting Services for the Mining Industry

Lower Crooked Creek Watershed Conservation Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

USDA Forest Service Proposed Soil and Water Restoration Categorical Exclusions Frequently Asked Questions Table of Contents

RE: Docket # COE ; ZRIN 0710 ZA05 Submitted via to NWP2012@usace.army.mil and Rulemaking Portal at

State of Utah Natural Resource Damage Trustee Southwest Jordan Valley Groundwater Cleanup. Report to the Public June 2004

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

Briefing Paper on Lower Galveston Bay and Bayou Watersheds Lower Bay I: Armand Bayou to Moses Lake and Adjacent Bay Waters

United States Army Corps of Engineers, Civil Works

Secretary William S. Cohen The Cohen Group DLA Piper LLP (US)

Chum Salmon recovery in Oregon tributaries to the lower Columbia River. Kris Homel Chum Reintroduction Coordinator

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

CHAPTER 2: APPROACH AND METHODS APPROACH

Aiding the Hydro-scheme development process. Web-links to useful information sources

ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS

LEAGUE NOTES ON APPROVED COMMUNITY WATER SUPPLY PLAN

Walla Walla Bi state Stream Flow Enhancement Study Interim Progress Report. Department of Ecology Grant No. G

October 11, Sharon Stohrer State Water Resources Control board P.O. Box 2000 Sacramento, CA

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Determination of NEPA Adequacy (DNA)

Urban Stream Restoration Defining the Full Benefits of a Project. Warren C. High MACTEC Engineering and Consulting

2016 Outlook and Management -Pre-season outlook / expectations and early indications - General overview of in-season management approach

Environmental Law Primer. Adapted from Vermont Law School s Environmental Law Primer for Journalists

Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC

SKAGIT COUNTY HABITAT IMPROVEMENT PLAN

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WATERS OF THE U.S. PROPOSAL

Gold Ray Dam Interagency Technical Team Meeting

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

The North State: Implementing the California Water Action Plan February 24, 2014

The Conservation Reserve Program: 45th Signup Results

Environmental Protection Agency

Request for Proposals: Suisun Marsh Managed Wetlands BMP Water Quality Improvement Pilot Project Technical Support

Nipigon Bay. Area of Concern Status of Beneficial Use Impairments September 2010

GAO PIPELINE PERMITTING. Interstate and Intrastate Natural Gas Permitting Processes Include Multiple Steps, and Time Frames Vary

The Muddy River: A Century of Change

THE NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT ORDINANCE (CAP LAWS OF SARAWAK, 1958 Ed.)

PUBLIC NOTICE PROJECT: Trans Bay Cable Maintenance Project

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Environmental Assessment

Arkansas River Corridor Vision & Master Plan

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Upper Des Plaines River & Tributaries, IL & WI Feasibility Study

Series 2016A-2 (Green Bonds) Final Proceeds Allocation April 2016

How To Decide If A Dam Removal Is Safe For Water Quality

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

There is a concerted effort in the regionto understand the sources, fate, transport and

DECISION DOCUMENT NATIONWIDE PERMIT 27

Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions

Chehalis Basin Strategy Reducing Flood Damage and Enhancing Aquatic Species Technical Workshop

The Nature Conservancy Offering Protected Lands for Sale in the Adirondacks Sustainable Forestry to Continue

Karuk Tribe Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge within Natural Resource Management

Oregon. Climate Change Adaptation Framework

30 DAY PUBLIC NOTICE MAINTENANCE DREDGING OF THE FEDERAL NAVIGATION PROJECT IN COHASSET HARBOR COHASSET AND SCITUATE, MASSACHUSETTS

PUZZLING PIPES. Grade Level: 4-6

San Juan County / WRIA2 Lead Entity Program for Salmon Recovery

Northern Middlesex Council of Governments

HYDROELECTRIC PERMITTING MANUAL FOR PENNSYLVANIA February 2015

PHOTO: Jon Waterman THE COLORADO RIVER DELTA, CIRCA NOW OPEN BOOKLET TO SEE CHANGE

Request for Proposal. Request for Proposal for GreenLink Bellingham Technical Analysis and Community Engagement, Bellingham, WA

401 Water Quality Certification and Isolated Wetlands Permitting in Ohio. Tom Harcarik Division of Surface Water

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

MINING AND WATER POLLUTION

JOINT PUBLIC NOTICE June 28, 2016

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Emery, Gary GIS Coordinator, Fisheries Dept, Hoopa Valley Tribe, P.O. Box 417, Hoopa, CA 95546; phone (530) x 22; gis@pcweb.

Environmental Review Process

Minutes Board Meeting October 16-17, 2013 Seattle, WA

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

JOB DESCRIPTION. GS-11 $46,006 - $59,801 Annual/Full Benefits GS-12 $55,138 - $71,679 Annual/Full Benefits

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

Restoring America s Everglades Progress and Next Steps for Restoring a Treasured Landscape and Sustaining a Way of Life

DRAFT SOUTH FORK SKYKOMISH RIVER

Using Aerial Photography to Measure Habitat Changes. Method

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

DRAFT RESTORATION PLAN FOR MCGIRTS CREEK PARK FOR

1 INTRODUCTION. Kayenta Complex Page 9 December 2011 Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Assessment

SAMPLE VISION, MISSION AND PURPOSE STATEMENTS

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

Chapter 9. Selected Watershed Initiatives in the Great Basin Region

Recommended Land Use Guidelines for Protection of Selected Wildlife Species and Habitat within Grassland and Parkland Natural Regions of Alberta

Council; PDS Land Capacity Analysis concerns for comp. plan Thursday, January 21, :12:32 AM

33 CFR PART 332 COMPENSATORY MITIGATION FOR LOSSES OF AQUATIC RESOURCES. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 401 et seq. ; 33 U.S.C. 1344; and Pub. L

Land and Resource Management Plan Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests

Re: Teck Frontier Oil Sands Mine Project: Responses to Supplemental Information Requests (SIRs)

WATER: ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE Syllabus

Exhibit SHN-029. Commission Mandatory Hearing SHINE Construction Permit Application Environmental Overview December 15, 2015

LIST OF FIGURES (following document)

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

RESTORATION & REVITALIZATION

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION. Background

Committee of Transportation and Infrastructure. Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment. Oversight Hearing

Integrated Restoration Prioritization

SERVICES NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE FISHERIES MARKET NEWS HOME PAGES

Transcription:

Region 10 Comment Invited on Proposal to Protect the Bristol Bay Watershed July 2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 requests comment on a proposal to protect one of the world s most valuable salmon fisheries, in Bristol Bay, Alaska, from the risks posed by a mine at the Pebble deposit. Development of this mine would result in one of the largest open pit copper mines in the world and would threaten one of the world s most productive salmon fisheries. The Bristol Bay watershed (See Map 1) is an area of unparalleled ecological value, boasting salmon diversity and productivity unrivaled anywhere in North America. It provides intact, connected habitats from headwaters to ocean that support abundant, genetically diverse wild Pacific salmon populations. These salmon populations, in turn, maintain the productivity of the entire ecosystem, including numerous other fish and wildlife species. Bristol Bay natural resources support commercial, subsistence, and recreational fisheries that are worth hundreds of millions in economic yield each year. Simply put, this is a uniquely large mine in a uniquely important place. Please add your voice to this important discussion about the future of the Bristol Bay watershed. The comment period is open until 8:00 p.m. Alaska time on September 19, 2014. Please find additional details about how to submit comments on page 6 of this fact sheet. Our Proposal to Protect the Bristol Bay Watershed Region 10 s proposal to protect the Bristol Bay watershed outlines restrictions that would protect waters that support salmon in and near the Pebble deposit area. The geographic restrictions of this proposal cover only the mining claims surrounding the Pebble deposit. See Map 2. No other lands or developments are subject to these restrictions. EPA Region 10 has initially concluded that mining the Pebble deposit would affect the South Fork Koktuli River, North Fork Koktuli River, and Upper Talarik Creek watersheds. The proposed restrictions are outlined in a document called the Proposed Determination. These restrictions are based on the construction and routine operation of a 0.25-billionton mine at the Pebble deposit. The 0.25 size mine was the smallest of the three mine scenarios EPA analyzed in the Bristol Bay Assessment and is significantly smaller than mines contemplated by Northern Dynasty Minerals. The EPA proposes to restrict the discharge of dredged or fill material related to mining the Pebble deposit that would result in any or all of the following: Loss of streams: The loss of five or more miles of streams with documented salmon occurrence (coho, Chinook, sockeye, chum, pink); or the loss of 19 or more miles of streams where salmon are not currently documented, but that are tributaries of streams with documented salmon occurrence Loss of wetlands, lakes, and ponds: The loss of 1,100 or more acres of wetlands, lakes, and ponds that connect with streams with documented salmon occurrence or tributaries of those streams Streamflow alterations: Streamflow alterations greater than 20 percent of daily flow in nine or more linear miles of streams with documented salmon occurrence Fact Sheet Contents Introduction: EPA Invites Public Comment...1 The Proposal to Protect the Bristol Bay Watershed...2 Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act...2 Why the EPA is initiating this action...4 How a Mine Would Affect the Bristol Bay Watershed.4 Your Comments Matter!...6 How to Submit Comments...6 Attend a Public Meeting...6 For More Information...7

Our Proposal to Protect the Bristol Bay Watershed According to EPA records, losses of the nature and magnitude listed on the previous page would be unprecedented for the Clean Water Act Section 404 regulatory program in the Bristol Bay region, as well as the rest of Alaska and the nation. Degradation of these aquatic resources is likely to be even more pronounced, given the extensive cumulative impacts expected with successive stages of mine expansion. If these restrictions are finalized, proposals to mine the Pebble deposit that have impacts below each of these restrictions would proceed to the Section 404 permitting process with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act The Clean Water Act generally requires a Section 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before any person places dredged or fill material into certain streams, wetlands, lakes and ponds. Section 404 directs EPA to develop the environmental criteria used to make permit decisions. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers authorizes thousands of Section 404 permits every year, and the EPA works with the Corps and developers to resolve environmental concerns so projects can move forward. However, the Clean Water Act, specifically Section 404(c), also authorizes the EPA to prohibit or restrict fill activities if EPA determines a project would have unacceptable adverse effects on fishery areas. The EPA has used its 404(c) authority sparingly, beginning the process in 30 instances and issuing final determinations only 13 times. The EPA s use of the authority has typically involved major projects with significant impacts on some of America s most ecologically valuable waters. The Section 404(c) process (See Figure ) allows for substantial input from the public, the tribes, Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act Corporations, the state, and the mining companies involved with the Pebble deposit. Bristol Bay Section 404 (c) Process Intent to Issue Notice of Proposed Determination (2/28/2014) Coordination with Pebble Limited Partnership, other subsidiaries of Northern Dynasty Minerals and the State of Alaska Notice of Proposed Determination (7/21/2014) Public Comment Period (7/21 to 9/19/2014) Recommended Determination Additional coordination with NDM, PLP and State of Alaska Final Determination Withdrawal (This can happen at any step of the process) US EPA Region 10 Photo 2

Map 1. The Nushagak and Kvichak River watersheds.

Why EPA Region 10 is initiating this action to protect the Bristol Bay Watershed In 2010, several Bristol Bay Alaska Native tribes, fishers, and other stakeholders requested that EPA take action to protect the Bristol Bay watershed and salmon resources from development of the proposed Pebble Mine using its authority under Clean Water Act Section 404(c). EPA Region 10 is proposing this action because the Clean Water Act requires the agency to protect the nation s waters, including the protection of fisheries. The Bristol Bay watershed is an area of exceptional ecological value with salmon fisheries unrivaled anywhere in North America. Development of a mine at the Pebble deposit would result in one of the largest open pit copper mines in the world and would threaten this valuable resource. The region s streams, wetlands, lakes and ponds provide intact habitat that support all five species of Pacific salmon found in North America: coho, Chinook, sockeye, chum, and pink. The salmon populations are critical to the health of the entire ecosystem, which is home to more than 20 fish species, 190 bird species, and more than 40 terrestrial mammal species, including bears, moose, and caribou. Bristol Bay supports commercial, subsistence, and recreational fisheries that are worth hundreds of millions in economic yield each year and create thousands of jobs. Bristol Bay s fishery resources have supported a subsistence-based way of life for Alaska Natives for over 4,000 years. After careful consideration of available science in the recently completed multi-year Bristol Bay Watershed Assessment and other available information, including extensive materials provided by Northern Dynasty Minerals and Pebble Limited Partnership, EPA Region 10 decided to proceed under its Clean Water Act Section 404(c) regulations to protect Bristol Bay resources from the adverse environmental effects of mining the Pebble deposit. EPA has received over 850,000 requests from citizens, tribes, Alaska Native corporations, commercial and sport fishers, jewelry companies, seafood processors, restaurant owners, chefs, conservation organizations, members of the faith community, sport recreation business owners, elected officials and others asking EPA to take action to protect Bristol Bay. How Mining the Pebble Deposit Would Affect the Bristol Bay Watershed Based on information provided by Northern Dynasty Minerals to investors and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, mining the Pebble deposit is likely to result in: A mine pit nearly as deep as the Grand Canyon. EPA estimates the mine would require excavation of the largest open pit ever constructed in North America and would cover nearly seven square miles at a maximum depth of over 3/4 of a mile. The maximum depth of the Grand Canyon is about one mile. Mine waste that would fill a large football stadium up to 3,900 times if the largest mine were built. This includes mine tailings and waste rock. Massive mine tailings impoundments that would cover approximately 19 square miles and waste rock piles that would cover nearly nine square miles in an area with productive streams and wetlands. 4 A mining operation that would cover an area larger than Manhattan. This includes all three mine components the EPA considered (mine pit, tailings impoundments, and waste rock piles). The construction of a mine would also require other infrastructure, such as a major transportation corridor, pipelines, a power-generating station, wastewater treatment plants, housing and support services for workers and administrative offices. Although preliminary plans could change, any mining of the Pebble deposit would require similar components. The EPA s analysis included a mine size smaller than what Northern Dynasty Minerals has articulated to investors. Even this smaller mine size would have significant, unacceptable impacts on salmon spawning and rearing areas

EPA Region 10 invites engagement with Alaska Native tribes and corporations. The Bristol Bay region is home to 31 Alaska Native Villages. Residents of the area depend on salmon both as a major food resource and for their economic livelihood. Nearly every household in the Nushagak and Kvichak watersheds uses salmon resources. Next Steps Map 2. Potential disposal site delineated in the proposed determination. Public comment will be accepted until September 19, 2014. EPA Region 10 will consider all input on its proposal and consider the next steps in the process, which could include moving toward a Recommended Determination to the EPA Assistant Administrator for Water at EPA Headquarters in Washington, D.C. 5

Your Comments Matter! The EPA would like your input on all aspects of the proposed determination. Here are some questions to consider when preparing your comments: Do you think the Proposed Determination should be recommended and finalized? Why or why not? Do you have additional information on potential impacts on the North Fork Koktuli River, South Fork Koktuli River and Upper Talarik Creek watersheds, and downstream reaches of the Nushagak and Kvichak Rivers resulting from mining of the Pebble deposit? Specifically information about: o Fish and other ecological resources o Water quality, flora, fauna and hydrology o Wildlife species o Recreation o Drinking water Can you suggest potential mitigation actions that could compensate for the damage caused by mining the Pebble deposit? Should the discharge of dredged or fill material be completely prohibited, restricted as proposed, restricted in another manner or not restricted at all at this time? How to Submit Comments to the EPA Public Docket for Bristol Bay Submit comments online at www.regulations.gov Specify Docket # EPA-R10-OW-2014-0505. This is the preferred method. Send comments via e-mail to: OW-Docket@epa.gov. Include EPA-R10-OW-2014-0505 in the subject line. Send a letter to the EPA Bristol Bay Docket at: Water Docket # EPA-R10-OW-2014-0505 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mail Code: 2822T 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20460 Testify at public hearings in Alaska; August 12 15, 2014. Make a request to accommodate language or other special needs by contacting Judy Smith at smith.judy@epa.gov or 503-326-6994. TDD or TTY users, please call 1-800-877-8339 and give the operator Judy s phone number. Public Hearings (Please check the EPA Bristol Bay website for meeting updates) Anchorage: Tuesday, August 12 at 2 p.m. Egan Center Cook and Artegan Rooms New Stuyahok: Wednesday, August 13 at 5 p.m. Cetuyaraq Community Center Nondalton: Wednesday, August 13 at 5 p.m. Nondalton Community Center Kokhanok: Thursday, August 14 at 5 p.m. Location to be announced Dillingham: Thursday, August 14 at 5 p.m. Middle School Gymnasium Iliamna: Friday, August 15 at 12 p.m. Community Center Igiugig: Friday, August 15 at 12 p.m. Tribal Hall 6

For More Information Website: www2.epa.gov/bristolbay Email: r10bristolbay@epa.gov Join the Bristol Bay listserv to get regular e-mail updates about the EPA s work by clicking on the link on the web page or sending an e-mail message to smith.judy@epa.gov. Community Involvement Coordinator: Judy Smith ) 503-326-6994 8 smith.judy@epa.gov Tribal Liaison: Tami Fordham )907-271-1484 8 fordham.tami@epa.gov Management Lead: Richard Parkin )206-553-8574 8 parkin.richard@epa.gov Photo Courtesy of Jonny Armstrong 7

Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, ETPA-202-4 Seattle, Washington 98101-3140 July 2014 US EPA Photo EPA Region 10 Invites Comment on Proposal to Protect the Bristol Bay Watershed Look Inside for Why EPA is Initiating This Action How Mining the Pebble Deposit would Impact the Bristol Bay Watershed How to Submit Comments to the EPA Public Docket for Bristol Bay