EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION



Similar documents
EMPLOYEE EVALUATION WORKSHEET

MILLSAPS COLLEGE ANNUAL EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff

City of Sunset Valley Employee Performance Evaluation Form

Employee Performance Review. Reference Guide

PERFORMANCE PLANNING AND APPRAISAL FORM NON-BARGAINING UNIT, NON-MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

Performance Evaluation Guide for Classified Staff Employees. Classified Staff Performance Evaluation Program

CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT

University of Mississippi Medical Center Employee Performance Review Form. Employee Position Title: Employee Job Code: Employee Grade:

Utica College Performance Review Form

Utica College Performance Review Form for LEADERSHIP

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

DEPAUW UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROGRAM Hourly Employees

ST. THOMAS UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT FORM WITH SUPERVISORY DUTIES

STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL (Non-Exempt)

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH, FOUNDATION EMPLOYEE PLANNING & PERFORMANCE REVIEW

Performance Evaluation Program. for Classified Staff Employees

Sample Performance Appraisal

Cleveland State Community College. Classified Employee Performance Review

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS

Initial Review 6 month Review Annual Other. Immediate Supervisor: Position Title: DRAFT

Performance Management and Evaluation for Administrators and Technical Professionals

PRESENTATION ON PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BY: LOUISE AGYEMAN-BARNING

Employee s Name: Susan Jones. Title: Administrative Officer. Supervisor: Marcia Meadows. Date: April 2, 200x

WINTHROP UNIVERSITY EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM POLICY AND PROCEDURE

Employee Performance Evaluation. I. Employee Information. Job Description. Attached.

Performance Review (Non-Exempt Employees)

2015 Performance Appraisal Template Samples

Employee Self-Evaluation Form

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL FORM

Part One: Review of Performance Elements Rating Scale

Staff Performance Evaluation

Writing Performance Objectives for Job Components: A Brief Tutorial

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION (Part-Time non-benefited staff only)

Interviews management and executive level candidates; serves as interviewer for position finalists.

IC Performance Standards

PART II GUIDE TO CONDUCTING A SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL BEFORE

1. Print a form for each one of your employees who is a supervisor or manager.

Bloomfield College Staff Employee Performance Review

POLICY STATEMENT AND REGULATIONS

Employee Performance Review and Development (Non-Exempt)

Employee Support and Development Performance Management Planning. Government Departments and Agencies

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH Joint Employee Performance Appraisal Form

Employee Performance Evaluation UConn Professional Staff (UCPEA) Unit

County of Orange Department of Fire & EMS Employee Performance Evaluation Company Officer. Hire Date: Period Covered:

Employee Performance Evaluation Form - Administrative Staff

Performance Appraisal

Performance Evaluation Form: Part-Time & Seasonal Employees

Classified Employee Performance Assessment

The Bureau of Public Service System PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM

Employee Performance Review

BC Public Service Competencies

University of Maryland Nonexempt Staff PRD Form

ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR NONFACULTY EMPLOYEES BANNER EMPLOYEE ID NUMBER:

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

Example: Box Elder District Classified Employee Evaluation and Improvement Report

Performance Management Handbook. City of American Canyon

Brant Haldimand Norfolk Catholic District School Board

Fayetteville Technical Community College PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL MANUAL

Employee Evaluation. 5= Outstanding: Performance is extraordinary and exceptional. (Outstanding ratings should only be awarded on rare occasions.

COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

INTRODUCTION PART ONE: REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE ELEMENTS

DALLAS COUNTY NON-EXEMPT PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

POLICE OFFICER (EMPLOYEE) EVALUATION

2. Describe this employee s important accomplishments during the past year. Please provide examples.

BUSINESS SYSTEMS MANAGER

Number of employees who report to level of evaluated:

Employee Development Plan

How To Work For A College Of Technology

Employee Performance Review

Performance Appraisal Review for Exempt Employees

South Carolina Budget and Control EPMS Performance Characteristics

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT

GOAL SETTING and PERFORMANCE REVIEW Form

Contract Administration Supervisor

Exempt Performance Reviews. Date Approved: June 23, 2008 Last Edited: June 3, 2014

Manchester Community Schools Bus Driver Performance Appraisal

FOOTHILL-DE ANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT

MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN

ADAMS STATE UNIVERSITY Performance Evaluation Process Performance Evaluation

Annual Performance Review

Classified Staff and Service Professional Performance Appraisal

CCAD Management Employee Performance Review

Libraries and Educational Technologies Professional & Performance Development Form Library Faculty Self Evaluation

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

EMPLOYEE REVIEW SYSTEM

Performance Evaluation

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL NON-ACADEMIC ADMINISTRATIVE - SUPERVISORY

Performance Management. Writing Performance Assessments and Goals 2014

Performance Factors and Campuswide Standards Guidelines. With Behavioral Indicators

CLASSIFIED EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS

Administrative Support Professionals Competency Framework. The Centre for Learning and Development

Human Relations Sherry Peters - Director, Human Relations Specialist Professional Phase 2 (SP2), ASPA Bargaining Unit

Transcription:

EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION For Exempt and Nonexempt Staff and Service Personnel Employee s Name (Last, First, MI): Position Title: Department: Period Covered: From: To: Type of Report: Probationary Employee Status: Exempt Supervisor Annual Nonexempt Non-Supervisor Other Rater (Name, Title) : Reviewer (Name, Title) : NEEDS MEETS EXCEEDS N/A POOR IMPROVEMENT EXPECTATIONS EXPECTATIONS SUPERIOR RATING SCALE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 PART I: PERFORMANCE FACTORS Knowledge, Skills & Abilities Quality of Work Quantity of Work Work Habits/Time Management Communication PART II: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS Dependability Interpersonal Relationships Initiative Adaptability Judgment

PART III: SUPERVISORY FACTORS Leadership Delegation Planning & Organizing Developing Others Personnel Management PART IV: OVERALL PERFORMANCE PART V: NARRATIVE: Discuss significant strengths and areas requiring improvement. All ratings of 1 and 2 in Parts II, III, and IV must be explained in detail in this section. An overall rating of 8 or 9 in Part V must be supported in this section. (Continuation sheets may be added.) SIGNATURES: Rater: Date: Reviewer: Date: PART VII: To the Employee: The ratings assigned to this performance evaluation represent judgments made by the supervisor regarding your performance of your responsibilities and duties, work-related behavioral traits and supervisory factors, if applicable, during the reporting period and will be reviewed by the next higher level supervisor prior to being placed in your permanent personnel file. You may request a meeting with your reviewer to discuss the rating. You have a period of 10 business days from the date on which you signed this evaluation to file a written appeal if you feel the ratings do not adequately reflect your performance. Policies and procedures for appealing the evaluation are set forth in Paragraph L, Appendix Q, Staff and Service Employees Personnel Handbook. I have reviewed this evaluation and have had the opportunity to discuss it with my rater. I understand that I may appeal this evaluation by following the above-referenced procedures. I agree with this evaluation. I do not agree with this evaluation. Employee s Signature: Date:

PART V CONTINUED: NARRATIVE: Discuss significant strengths and areas requiring improvement. All ratings of 1 and 2 in Parts II, III, and IV must be explained in detail in this section. An overall rating of 8 or 9 in Part V must be supported in this section.

KNOWLEDGE SKILLS AND ABILITIES: Employee's work product demonstrates an application of the technical knowledge and various skills needed ie: managing computer-based records, familiarity with UPD policies, laws and regulations. Employee keeps abreast of developments and trends in law enforcement. QUALITY OF WORK: Produces accurate, neat work product. Performs work thoroughly, expresses self well in verbally and in writing. QUANTITY OF WORK: completes work assigned, and on time. manages a variety of tasks and projects. WORK HABITS/TIME MANAGEMENT: Employee develops comprehensive, realistic plans and organizes work assignments to ensure timely completion of quality work products. Manages time well and effectively handles multiple demands and competing priorities. Take initiative in assuming more complex assignments and developmental activities. Attends work regularly, and observes work hours. COMMUNICATION: Interacts professionally and courteously with supervisors, coworkers, citizens and others; readily shares information and provides assistance; verbally communicates information in an understandable manner; written communications are consistently clear and accurate; demonstrates understanding of instructions; demonstrates tolerance in working with coworkers, others and with changes in job conditions; demonstrates tolerance of differing behaviors, customs and communication styles; understands and works toward group goals and objectives; encourages and is receptive to new ideas and procedures. DEPENDABILITY: Performs duties willingly. Personal problems do not effect work performance. Accepts suggestions and follows directions: Considers constructive criticism and makes necessary changes in performance. Follows directions of supervisor. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS: Employee gets along with others and establishes effective relationships to accomplish work products or service. Demonstrates respect for others, including the community and peers. Demonstrates courtesy and tact when dealing with people. Fully participates as a team member in the accomplishment of the work product. INITIATIVE: Understands and accepts new situations, performs well with minimal instructions. Makes sounds decisions in absence of detailed instructions or direct supervision. Keeps supervisor informed on status of assigned work. ADAPTABILITY: Demonstrates good judgment, makes reasonable decisions, Practices self-control thinks before acting. Employee Analyzes situations accurately and adapts well to change. Performs well in new situations, adjusts to new scheduling and/or changes in schedules, demonstrates willingness to learn new tasks and procedures. Demonstrates willingness to incorporate new ideas or methods. JUDGEMENT: Uses good judgment and a common-sense approach to situations, particularly during stressful situations; requires minimal supervision; determines appropriate course of action and takes same; does not allow situations to further deteriorate; recognizes when to ask for assistance; anticipates situations and prepares for them; is capable of changing way of thinking and performing in conjunction with the needs of the SUPERVISORY FACTORS: You should evaluate the employee's supervisory abilities as an officer. Indicate where the officer actually makes use of these factors. If not applicable, mark N/A. If no leadership qualities apply make note in comments section. LEADERSHIP: Demonstrates the ability to get other people to work together effectively; is able to see the "big picture" and articulate how the pieces fit together; takes ownership for own activities; recognizes and appreciates individual differences; interacts with others objectively; is able to draw upon his/her own resources in Assessing situations and taking or recommending appropriate action for resolution. DELEGATION: Assigns responsibility to an employee to complete a task, grants the employee sufficient authority to gain the resources to do the task and allows the employee decide how that task will be carried out. Shares accountability with the employee for ensuring the task is completed.

PLANNING AND ORGANIZING: Defines expectations and tasks clearly. Plans and organizes work, coordinates with others, establishes appropriate priorities. Allows sufficient time for completion of assignments. Delegates authority when appropriate. Determines appropriate action and follows through in a timely and decisive manner. Is well organized and uses time productively. Ensures that work products and services consistently meet needs of customers. DEVELOPING OTHERS: Effectively and timely evaluates subordinates; encourages and initiates regular discussion of performance; fosters the learning and development of others through coaching, managing performance, and mentoring. PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT: Brings about an enthusiastic and optimistic attitude in the unit, Rewards and recognizes individual and team successes. Provides timely information on performance and frequent feedback. Resolves differences and seeks win/win outcomes. Acts forthrightly in response to unacceptable behavior or performance and focuses on the situation, issue or behavior rather than on the person. Promotes employee safety and wellness. Maintains appropriate confidentiality OVERALL PERFORMANCE: To arrive at an overall evaluation of the employee s performance, supervisors consider the relative importance of each work goal and competency with its relative weight. Moreover, supervisors should consider performance and accomplishment that furthered the goals/objectives of the organization, contributions above and beyond completion of basic work assignments and completion of or contribution to special projects.