COMPUTER MODEL TIL BEREGNING AF EEDI OG RØGGASEMISSIONER FOR FORSKELLIGE SKIBSTYPER

Similar documents
Emission support system for calculation of energy demand and emissions of ships. Hans Otto Kristensen

Green Ship of the Future

Design and Operation of Fuel Efficient Ships. Jan de Kat Director, Energy Efficiency Operational and Environmental Performance Copenhagen

Environmental Performance Evaluation of Ro-Ro Passenger Ferry Transportation

How To Reduce Energy Efficiency On Ships

Energy Efficiency of Ships: what are we talking about?

Challenges and Opportunities. Niels Bjørn Mortensen Maersk Maritime Technology

DUAL FUEL ENGINES LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Propulsion Trends in LNG Carriers

M. Dogliani Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI): norme IMO ed aspetti tecnici. PORT&SHIPPING TEC Green - Shipping Summit - Novembre 2011

Tier III emission technology

Market Conditions, Achievements & Challenges, General Technical Update

Retrofit Opportunities for Existing Fleet

Dry Bulk Carriers Vessel: Bulk Americas

Laws and price drive interest in LNG as marine fuel

New Ferries for Gedser - Rostock. Development of a transport concept GR12. Ferry Conference in Copenhagen 22 nd November 2010

Carbon Footprint of Refrigerated Goods Transportation

> Capital Markets Day 2011

ANNEX 10. RESOLUTION MEPC.214(63) Adopted on 2 March GUIDELINES ON SURVEY AND CERTIFICATION OF THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY DESIGN INDEX (EEDI)

Cleaner Shipping Environmental regulation Challenges and possibilities for consultants

EEOI Monitoring Tool. User s Manual

Monitoring Air Emissions on Ships. Restricted Siemens AG 2014 All rights reserved.

The influence of ship operational parameters on fuel consumption

Grain Capacity: No Hold name Hold C.B.M. ULUSOY-11

IMO. REVIEW OF MARPOL ANNEX VI AND THE NO x TECHNICAL CODE. Development of Standards for NO x, PM, and SO x. Submitted by the United States

FURTHER TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR ENHANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING

Exhaust Emissions from Ship Engines in Australian Waters Including Ports

Possible Technical Modifications on Pre-2000 Marine Diesel Engines for NOx Reductions

EMISSIONS FROM MARINE ENGINES VERSUS IMO CERTIFICATION AND REQUIREMENTS OF TIER 3

THE NEXT REVOLT 18 BATTERY COASTAL TRAFFIC REVOLT IN BRIEF

LNG as Ship Fuel. Effects on Ship Design, Operations and Supporting Infrastructure

SOx - FUEL CHANGE MANUAL. Manual No. 01

GAS FLAWLESS - FORM C

Trends in the Development of Container Vessels

Gas Fuelled ships. LNG-Fuelled Engines and Fuel Systems for Medium- Speed Engines in Maritime Applications. Dag Stenersen, MARINTEK

GUIDELINES FOR VOLUNTARY USE OF THE SHIP ENERGY EFFICIENCY OPERATIONAL INDICATOR (EEOI)

FKAB is and has been an independent marine consultancy since 1961, this makes us an innovative and reliable partner for the Marine and Shipbuilding

Stena S ,200 DWT Product/Chemical Tanker CONQUEST CONQUEROR CONCORD CONCEPT CONSUL CONTEST

OFFSHORE WIND Peter Robert

MAN Diesel & Turbo. Frederik Carstens Head of Offshore Sales Marine Medium Speed. Frederik Carstens & Karsten Borneman

The Effects of Length on the Powering of Large Slender Hull Forms

EEDI. Energy Efficiency Design Index

What does mandatory shore power in EU mean?

The age of LNG is here

GREEN SHORTSEA SHIPPING The shipowners perspective Juan Riva President European Community Shipowners Associations ECSA Flota Suardíaz

M/V TAMARITA/FERMITA/ ROSITA/FAVORITA

Press Release Page 2 / 9

Copyright 2012 Mayekawa Mfg. Co.,Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

Wet or Dry? Which Scrubber Type will Reign Supreme?

SURVEY and CERTIFICATION RULES on ENERGY EFFICIENCY of SHIPS (MARPOL 73/78 ANNEX VI, CHAPTER 4) SEPTEMBER 2015

US Shipbuilding and LNG JECKU TEM. Tom Wetherald

Marine after-treatment from STT Emtec AB

WÄRTSILÄ SERVICES BUSINESS WHITE PAPER

IMO REQUIREMENTS FROM JULY 2015 TO JULY 2018 INCLUSIVE

lng conversion (General)

Rolls-Royce Marine - The Environship Concept System Solutions & Wave Piercing Technology

TRITON V. Cylinder Pressure Monitoring CPM 500. Replaces mechanical indicators on diesel engines. Improves combustion

of Presentation Performance Management

Crowley LNG. Puget Sound Harbor Safety Committee June 3 rd, Matthew Sievert Director Business Development LNG

LNG Fuel for Shipping

Marine Engine. IMO Tier ll and Tier lll Programme 2015

Scorpio Tankers, Inc. Q Conference Call. April 29, 2013

Exhaust Scrubbers. What you need to know. Move Forward with Confidence

Viking Grace 20 months' experience of Ship to Ship LNG bunkering

Costs and benefits of LNG as ship fuel for container vessels

Bergen Engines Products and Applications

Ballast Water Management

LNG Bunkering Opportunities SNAME

Fjord Line AS a company running on LNG. Presentation, Thursday March 5th 2015

Cost optimization of marine fuels consumption as important factor of control ship s sulfur and nitrogen oxides emissions

Key Technologies of Mitsubishi LNG Carriers - Present and Future -

LNG AS A MARINE FUEL POSSIBILITIES AND PROBLEMS

Wärtsilä Dual-Fuel LNGC

How To Optimise A Boat'S Hull

VM 32. Efficiency and Performance New Product Development Modular Design Cylinder

Marpol 73/78 Annex VI Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships. Technical and Operational implications

A study into the fuel savings potential by a major rebuild of propulsion system

GOLIATH DPIII OFFSHORE SUPPORT VESSEL. Vessel Specification - December 2011

Ambient Temperature Operation and Matching MAN B&W Two-stroke Engines

Historical trends in ship design efficiency

container ship update NEWS FROM DNV TO THE CONTAINER SHIP INDUSTRY No

Alfa Laval Slide 3

Wärtsilä Services Business White Paper. More flexibility, less emissions and lower fuel costs. Fuel efficiency in gas conversions.

LNG Propulsion System

SURVEY and CERTIFICATION RULES on ENERGY EFFICIENCY of SHIPS (MARPOL 73/78 ANNEX VI, CHAPTER 4)

Ferry Solutions by Wärtsilä

Calculating and Comparing CO 2 Emissions from the Global Maritime Fleet

Exhaust Emissions from Ship Engines Significance, Regulations, Control Technologies

Engine Room Console 6

WÄRTSILÄ 50DF PRODUCT GUIDE

DNV GL PREPARING FOR LOW SULPHUR OPERATION

FPT FIAT POWERTRAIN TECHNOLOGIES PRESENTS ITS ENGINE RANGE FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS AT INTERMAT 2009

CLEANER SHIPPING. focus on air pollution, technology and regulation

Niels Hjørnet Yacht Design Yacht Design. Niels Hjørnet Yacht Design

Implementing a Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) Guidance for shipowners and operators

Ready to realise your vision

WÄRTSILÄ 34DF PRODUCT GUIDE

Transcription:

COMPUTER MODEL TIL BEREGNING AF EEDI OG RØGGASEMISSIONER FOR FORSKELLIGE SKIBSTYPER HANS OTTO HOLMEGAARD KRISTENSEN CHEFKONSULENT, DANMARKS REDERIFORENING (HOK@SHIPOWNERS.DK)

Generic ship model Skibsteknisk Selskab 25. februar 2013 Input Ship type Capacity Speed Engine technology Output Ship main particulars Required propulsion power E nergy demand EEDI E xhaust gas emissions Ship data Units Deafult values First modification Second modification Maximum deadweight tons 75000 75000 75000 Elongation in percent % 0 0 3 Length between pp m 218.00 218.00 224.54 Length in waterline incl. bulbous bow m 222.36 222.36 229.03 Breadth mld. m 32.23 32.23 32.23 Depth m 19.30 19.30 19.30 Design draught m 12.83 12.83 12.84 Maximum draught m 13.94 13.94 13.94 Design deadweight/maximum deadweight % 90 90 90 Maximum draugth - design draught m 1.12 1.12 1.11 Design deadweight tons 67500 67500 67500 Lightweight coefficient (excl. CSR allowance) t/m 3 0.0790 0.0790 0.0790 Lightweight (default incl. CSR allowance) tons 11247 11247 11584 Structural enhancement (change of lightweight) pct. 0 0 0 Displacement at design draught tons 78747 78747 79084 Displacement at maximum draught tons 86247 86247 86584 Design Dw/Design displacement % 85.7 85.7 85.4 Scantling Dw/Maximum displacement % 87.0 87.0 86.6 Block coefficient at design draught - 0.853 0.853 0.831 Block coefficient at maximum draught - 0.859 0.859 0.837 Lpp/Displ. 1/3 at design draught - 5.13 5.13 5.27 Lpp/Displ. 1/3 at maximum draught - 4.97 4.97 5.12 Midship section coefficient - 0.995 0.995 0.995 Prismatic coefficient at design draught - 0.857 0.857 0.835 Prismatic coefficient at maximum draught - 0.863 0.863 0.841 Waterplane area coefficient at maximum draught - 0.936 0.936 0.918 Wetted surface at design draught m 2 11237 11237 11427 Wetted surface at maximum draught m 2 11806 11806 12005 Service speed at design draught knots 14.6 14.0 14.0 Froude number at service speed - 0.161 0.154 0.152 Max. draught trial speed at 75 % MCR (EEDI ref. speed) knots 14.3 13.7 13.7 Froude number at EEDI reference speed - 0.159 0.151 0.149 Service allowance on resistance pct. 15 15 15 Transmission efficiency pct. 98 98 98 Main engine power (MCR) kw 10456 8774 8105 Auxiliary power at sea at design draught kw 511 439 405 Propeller type (1 = conventional - 2 = ducted) (-) 1 1 1 Propeller diameter m 6.81 6.81 6.81 Propeller loading (MCR) kw/m 2 287 241 223 Speed dependency exponent n (Power = constant V n ) - 4.2 3.9 3.6 IMO Energy Efficiency Design Index (CO 2 emissions) g/dwt/nm 4.36 3.82 3.54 IMO Energy Efficiency Design Index (MEPC 62) g/dwt/nm 4.55 4.55 4.55

ENGINE TYPE & TECHNOLOGY Main engine type (slow speed = 1, medium speed = 2) (-) 1 1 1 Main engine service rating (for non derated engine only) pct. MCR 90 90 90 Fuel type (HFO = 1, MD/GO = 2, LNG = 3 (only 4 stroke), Dual fuel = 4) - 2 2 2 Sulphur content in heavy fuel (HFO) pct. 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sulphur content in diesel oil or gas oil (DO/GO) pct. 1.0 1.0 1.0 Derated 2 stroke main engine? (NO = 0, YES = 1) - 0 0 0 Fuel optimised main engine? (NO = 0, YES = 1) - 0 0 0 TIER 1, 2 or 3 engine? (1-3) - 2 2 2 Specify NOx reduction technology: EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) =1, SCR (Selective Catalyic Reduction) = 2 or other technology = 3-1 1 1 Use of scrubbers if oil is used (NO = 0, YES=1) - 0 0 0

Engine and emission reduction technologies Main engine Auxiliary engines Main engine Auxiliary engines Main engine Auxiliary engines Main engine type (2-stroke = 1, 4-stroke = 2) 1 2 1 2 1 2 Derated main engine - only for 2 stroke engines (NO = 0, YES = 1) 0-0 - 0 - Fuel for main engine (HFO = 1, MDO/GO = 2, LNG = 3 (only for 4 stroke), Dual fuel = 4) 2 2 2 2 2 2 Fuel optimised main engine? (0 = NO, 1 = YES) 0-0 - 0 - TIER 1, 2 or 3 engine (If individual NOx reduction technology is selected then press 0) 2 2 2 2 2 2 Specify NOx reduction technology: EGR (Exhaust Gas Recirculation) =1, SCR (Selective Catalyic Reduction) = 2 or other technology = 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 Sulphur content in % in heavy fuel oil (HFO) 1-1 - 1 - Sulphur content in % in diesel/gas oil (DO/GO) 1 1 1 1 1 1 Use of scrubbers (NO = 0, YES=1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emission factors Fuel consumption (kg/kw/hour) 0.173 0.194 0.173 0.194 0.173 0.194 CO2 emission (g/kw/hour) 556 621 556 621 556 621 NOx emission (g/kw/hour) 13.6 9.6 13.6 9.6 13.6 9.6 CO emission (g/kw(hour) 0.35 0.50 0.35 0.50 0.35 0.50 HC emission (g/kw/hour) 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Particulates (g/kw/hour) 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 S content in oil (pct.) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 SO2 emission (g/kw/hour) 3.64 4.07 3.64 4.07 3.64 4.07 CO2 emission (g/kg fuel) 3206 3206 3206 3206 3206 3206 NOx emission (g/kg fuel) 78.4 49.5 78.4 49.5 78.4 49.5 CO emission (g/kg fuel) 2.02 2.58 2.02 2.58 2.02 2.58 HC emission (g/kg fuel) 2.88 2.58 2.88 2.58 2.88 2.58 Particulates (g/kg fuel) 2.6 2.3 2.6 2.3 2.6 2.3 SO2 emission (g/kg fuel) 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Calorific value (MJ/kg fuel) 42.7 42.7 42.7 42.7 42.7 42.7 Calorific value (MJ/kg oil) 42.7 42.7 42.7 42.7 42.7 42.7 Calorific value (MJ/kg LNG) 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 SFOC change due to engine type (pct.) derated versus normal engine 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Extra energy demand due to scrubber (pct.) 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 Extra energy demand due to NOx reducing EGR technology (pct.) 2.0 2 2.0 2 2.0 2 Total change of SFOC (pct.) 2.0 2 2.0 2 2.0 2 NOx reduction compared to Tier 1 (pct.) 20 20 20 20 20 20 Particulate reduction (pct.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 SO2 reduction (pct.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 DANMARKS REDERIFORENING - Dual fuel 28/02/2013 Diesel oil (pilot fuel) in pct. 6 Gas in pct. 94

Emissions and energy demand Condition data Capacity utilization (100 % ~ design condition) % 100 100 100 Deadweight (cargo + consumerables + ballast water etc.) tons 67500 67500 67500 Payload (cargo) tons 64125 64125 64125 Draught m 12.83 12.83 12.84 Ship speed knots 14.6 14.0 14.0 Speed dependency exponent N (Power = constant V N ) 4.1 3.9 3.6 Energy demand Energy demand per hour GJ/hour 74 62 56 Energy demand per nautiacal mile GJ/nm 5.1 4.4 4.0 Energy demand per ton deadweight per nautiacal mile MJ/dwt/nm 0.075 0.066 0.059 Energy demand per ton payload per km MJ/t/km 0.043 0.037 0.034 Oil consumption Oil consumption per hour t/hour 1.73 1.45 1.32 Oil consumption demand per nautiacal mile kg/nm 118 104 94 Oil consumption per ton deadweight per nautiacal mile g/dwt/nm 1.75 1.54 1.39 CO 2 emissions CO 2 emissions per hour t/hour 5.5 4.7 4.2 CO 2 emissions per nautical mile kg/nm 380 333 301 CO 2 emissions per ton deadweight per nautical mile g/dwt/nm 5.6 4.9 4.5 NOx emissions NOx emissions per hour kg/hour 133 112 101 NOx emissions per nautical mile kg/nm 9.1 8.0 7.2 NOx emissions per ton deadweight per nautical mile g/dwt/nm 0.135 0.118 0.107 SOx emissions SOx emissions per hour kg/hour 36 31 28 SOx emissions per nautical mile kg/nm 2.5 2.2 2.0 SOx emissions per ton deadweight per nautical mile g/dwt/nm 0.037 0.032 0.029 CO emissions CO emissions per hour kg/hour 3.55 2.98 2.70 CO emissions per nautical mile kg/nm 0.243 0.213 0.193 CO emissions per ton deadweight per nautical mile g/dwt/nm 0.0036 0.0032 0.0029 Particulate emissions Particulate emissions per hour kg/hour 4.41 3.70 3.35 Particalate emissions per nautical mile kg/nm 0.30 0.26 0.24 Particulate emissions per ton deadweight per nautical mile g/dwt/nm 0.0045 0.0039 0.0035

The ship design and emission model can be downloaded from: http://www.fvm.mek.dtu.dk/centre/fvm/english/software/ship_emissions.aspx.

M aritime research and technology development an d f utur e requirements Thank you Questions? DANMARKS REDERIFORENING - 28/02/2013