Why Are Rivers Important? Ecosystem Service Definition Via Qualitative Research: A Southwestern Pilot Study



Similar documents
Stream Monitoring at Tumacácori NHP

Healthy Forests Resilient Water Supply Vibrant Economy. Ecological Restoration Institute

Sustainability Brief: Water Quality and Watershed Integrity

The Colorado River Delta

Ring s Reflections. by Bob Ring. Tucson s Waterworld

Markets for Ecosystem Services on Agricultural Lands: Experience and Outlook in the United States

Using an All lands Framework for Conservation of Ecosystem Services

ERP: Willamette-Ecosystem Services Project

Gulf Hypoxia and Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

HCP Team Meeting. November 18, icfi.com

RECOGNIZING THE VALUE OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING

Presented by Dani Wise Johnson Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

Restoring Arizona s Forests: Strategies to Accelerate Action. October 3 4, 2013

Update on Ecosystem Services in the Federal Government. Kristin E. Skrabis Office of Policy Analysis U.S. Department of the Interior April 30, 2014

Stream Rehabilitation Concepts, Guidelines and Examples. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. Three Laws of Stream Restoration

The Albert J. and Mary Jane Black Institute for Environmental Studies

EFB / Online Wetland Restoration Techniques Class Syllabus

Urban Waters and River Restoration. Pinja Kasvio, Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE RESTORE North Region Closing Seminar 14.8.

Using Technology to Administer a Reclaimed Water Program. Abstract

Site Establishment and Monitoring Report

PHOTO: Jon Waterman THE COLORADO RIVER DELTA, CIRCA NOW OPEN BOOKLET TO SEE CHANGE

Water Forever: South West Margaret River Forum

DEQ Response to Comments regarding the Public Notice for a Coal Mining Project in the Panther Creek watershed In Craig and Nowata Counties.

Pajaro River Watershed Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Update Project Solicitation Form

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

Bruce Orr and Zooey Diggory S T I L L W A T E R S C I E N C E S. Tom Dudley U C S A N T A B A R B A R A

The Sustainable Sites Initiative: Future Business Opportunities? 2009 Sustainable Sites Initiative

Hydrogeology Experiment on Surface-Groundwater Interactions: How Do Our Actions Affect Water Quantity and Quality?

Ecosystem Services in the Greater Houston Region. A case study analysis and recommendations for policy initiatives

Supervisors: Dr David Agnew Imperial College, MSC Dr E.J Milner-Gulland Imperial College Dawn Martin - SeaWeb

Michigan Wetlands. Department of Environmental Quality

Haynes Recreation Center, Laredo, TX. Data Matrix and Sustainability Benchmarks

NCEAS Workshop 2: A Standard Assessment Framework for Ecosystem Services

EPA Trends for wastewater Treatment in California

Rhode Island NRCS received approximately $2.4 million in ARRA funds to implement four floodplain easement projects.

HERE COMES THE RAIN AGAIN Stormwater Management in a Changing Climate at the City of Toronto

Environmental Engineering, University of Seoul, Jennong-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea.

SECTION 3.2 CLIMATE AND PRECIPITATION

The Delaware Valley Early Warning System Kelly Anderson, Philadelphia Water

The 25 Year Saskatchewan Water Security Plan. February 2013

Southeast Arizona Citizens Forum. Nogales, Arizona. April 07, *Tentative Meeting Notes*

Integrated Water Resources Management Can source protection lead us to the promised land?

PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABILITY FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES: INCORPORATING SUSTAINABILITY CONSIDERATIONS IN ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS

Project Theory-Climate Change and Traditional Ecological Knowledge Adaption in the Klamath Basin

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF WATER USES GESTÃO INTEGRADA DE BACIAS HIDROGRÁFICAS INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO

Short Report. Research and development project Communicating the concept of ecosystem services on the basis of the TEEB study

Watershed Data Collection and Analysis

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

18 voting members 44 stakeholders 114 list. Senators: Wyden & Merkley Representative DeFazio

action plan water for life water for life action plan 1

Lesson 5: Water Conductivity and Total Dissolved Solids Water Quality Sampling

IOWA STATE REVOLVING FUND CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION. To: All Interested Citizens, Government Agencies, and Public Groups

Potential Economic Benefits to Santa Ana River Watershed of Forest Restoration. Barbara Wyse, Senior Economist

Water Quality and Water Usage Surveys

Tools from the US EPA s Climate Ready Water Utilities Initiative (CRWU) EPA Region 3 Conference Extreme Weather Events: Adapt, Mitigate, and Survive

Section 5: Conserve to Enhance Program Goals What is Conserve to Enhance All About?

Background research on the topic of urban forestry is intended to

Fiskville Training College

General Permit for Activities Promoting Waterway - Floodplain Connectivity [working title]

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

Developing a Campus Culture of Graduate Student & Post-doc Professional Development

Tres Rios del Norte Feasibility Study

Sustainable Funding Mechanisms for Restoration Work

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

FINAL REPORT ON DOT WORKSHOP, Integrating Stream Restoration Principles & Transportation Maintenance

A Cost Analysis of Stream Compensatory Mitigation Projects in the Southern Appalachian Region 1

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

Addendum D. Nomination of Moody Wash ACEC

CASE STUDY. City of Grand Rapids Stormwater Asset Management Program. City of Grand Rapids. By the Numbers

RESTORATION OF URBAN WATERWAYS AS A GREEN INFRA

Why should you care about the Arizona Water Settlements Act?

1. Purpose and scope. 2. SEPA's role in hydropower and planning

Halton Region Planning & Public Works Committee Meeting July 8, 2015

LR 314 Working Group 5 Final Report

FOUR RIVERS RESTORATION PROJECT

Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC

Exploring the Possibilities of Small Hydropower Development Utilizing NRCS-Assisted Flood Control Dams

Experience in Wetlands restoration and conservation concerning natural water retention measures. Ministry of Environment and Water, Bulgaria

Litter can be a personal issue. For some, the shock of seeing sea lions munching

Passive Restoration 101: Framework and Techniques Overview. Amy Chadwick, Great West Engineering August 26, 2015 Butte, America

MS4 Municipal Stormwater Compliance: Pollutant Removal through Floodplain Restoration / Reconnection Villanova Urban Stormwater Partnership

Town of Richmond Hill Community Stewardship Program

MN Lake Superior Watershed Stream Science Symposium: Economic Aspects of Stream Restoration Henry Eichman USDA Forest Service, TEAMS Enterprise Unit

Monitoring at Credit Valley Conservation. Presented by Jackie Thomas and Luke Harvey

Long Term Challenges for Tidal Estuaries

Apache Hadoop Patterns of Use

Course Syllabus: Marketing Research

US Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District. Santa Cruz River, Paseo de las Iglesias Pima County, Arizona PROJECT SUMMARY

Cover Letter Lecture/Exercise

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

Habitat rehabilitation for inland fisheries

ARIZONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 949 East Second Street Library and Archives Tucson, AZ (520) Fax: (520)

Ecosystem Services, Wetlands and Houston s Growth. Jim Lester

DOES YOUR COMPANY NEED AN SPCC PLAN? Larry Seabolt Remtech Engineers Remediation Specialists

Overview of the Division of Water Restoration Assistance

Transcription:

Why Are Rivers Important? Ecosystem Service Definition Via Qualitative Research: A Southwestern Pilot Study M. Weber USEPA Other Partners: P. Ringold USEPA Sonoran Institute H. Thurston USEPA Arizona DEQ L. Norman USGS EPA Region 9 Nita Tallent-Halsell USDOI NPS Tumacacori NHP B. Labiosa USGS... 12/9/2010

Presentation Outline 1. Why the fuss about ecosystem service definition? 2. Background on ecosystem services of streams 3. How Qualitative Research can be applied 4. Background on the Santa Cruz River case study 5. Preliminary findings from resident interviews & next steps

What Are Ecosystem Services? More relevant but hard to describe to one s spouse Numerous definitions, share Human Health & Well-Being goal How are ESs different from the same old thing? Source: Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005 Can we gain some grounding by actually talking with people? Source: P. Ringold, after J. Boyd

What Are Ecosystem Services? Source: P. Ringold, after J. Boyd Intermediate Ecosystem Services vs. Final Ecosystem Services Intermediate Ecosystem Services absolutely still important

What Are Ecosystem Services of Streams? EPA 2009 Workshop Indicators of Final Ecosystem Services of Streams Working hypothesis developed for stream user groups Relevance for EPA National Monitoring Attended by 25 social and natural scientists Funded by USEPA, Corvallis, OR Organizers: P. Ringold, J. Boyd, D. Landers, M. Weber

What Are Ecosystem Services of Streams? EPA 2009 Workshop Working Hypothesis http://www.epa.gov/nheerl/arm/streameco/index. html (structure below) User Group Quantity Quality Recreation Non-User 27 beneficiary categories, 16 col., 432 cells total What is important to measure at a stream site? Is there some way to test the working hypothesis?

What is Qualitative Research? A formal way of actually talking with people Several disciplines, e.g Grounded Theory, & numerous journals Vetted interview and focus-group protocols Find out what people care about also why Idea and hypothesis-generating. Surprises expected. Can explore cognition, contextual factors NOT quantitative Under-represented in valuation research

Human Subjects Strategy Phase 1: Sample of convenience 22 interviews in November, 2010: 12 neighborhood contacts; 10 orgs. n = 22 Over 70% of those contacted agreed to be interviewed No incentives, no Spanish translation

What is The Santa Cruz River? 4 3 2 1 Map Key # = Photo Location = River Channel (flows north) = Wastewater Treatment Plant Maps courtesy of Google US Mexico

1 2 Tumacacori, AZ North of Amado, AZ 3 4 Near W. St. Mary s Rd., Tucson, AZ Near W. El Camino del Cerro, Tucson, AZ

How did it go? General - Recruiting is time-intensive, but 70%+ ultimately agreed If unfamiliar: difficulty with the task. Photos helped. If familiar: difficulty imagining something different. Difficulty abstracting from tradeoffs, so asked for wish list. Teasing out the obvious, but preferences varied. Pragmatic channel focus misses important things: Beyond Active Channel Beyond Natural Factors Ecological vs. Anthropogenic Context vs. Specifics

What did they say? Ecological Context - Desire for natural Importance of reference state Environmental ethics health of the land, not the people so much Precautionary principle Really a foolish thing to let them [species] go if we don t even understand the benefits they give us Deference to scientists That s why I love science they can evaluate those things and decide what is the most responsible Desire for self-sustaining system

What did they say? Ecological Specifics - Water Quantity for water supply; recharge; floods Water Quality for safe water supply Water presence/absence, for esthetics Vegetation: lush ; green ; huge trees ; dense Animals: birds ; fish ; lizards

What did they say? Anthropogenic Context - Human connections, history, community It actually matters to me that other people feel connected to their river The way we ve killed the river has had an enormous impact right down to Tucson s identity Non-use value for others use value. Concern for downstream. Aquifer recharge: volume stored and safe quality Hard to extract preferences from tradeoffs, known & unknown You are asking me to play God. I don t have all the answers I Don t know enough to know Photo: Sonoran Institute

What did they say? Anthropogenic Specifics - Personal Safety (other people; channelized banks) Chemical/Biological Safety (drinking, contact recreation) Lack of garbage, graffiti Natural banks, not channelized Accessibility (pro and con) Sound, Odor

So now what? Prepare for Phase 2: Focus-Groups, incentives, translation Integrate with EPA stream monitoring (see Ringold et al., ACES 2010) Compare with definitions of FES of streams in the literature (see Beadles et al., ACES 2010) Proceed to Phase 3: Pre-test & Survey Integrate with Santa Cruz Watershed Ecosystem Portfolio Model (see Norman et al., ACES 2010) Tribal study potential Planning parallel qualitative study in the Willamette Valley

Thanks (541) 754-4315 weber.matthew@epa.gov West Branch of the Santa Cruz River 1904 and 1981 Photos by NOAA

What Are Ecosystem Services of Streams? Variety in goods (see Beadles et al. ACES 2010) EPA National Monitoring grapples with this Meta-analyses grapple with this Johnston et al. 2005, Canadian Journal of Ag Econ van Houtven et al. 2007, Energy & Resource Econ EPA Regulatory Impact Analyses grapple with this Researchers struggle with this

Interview Script Outline Confidentiality terms, verify consent Warm-up, trust building Any questions before we begin? Would you say you are familiar with rivers and streams around here or unfamiliar? Is there anything important to you about rivers & streams in S. AZ.? o Follow-up, probe questions Is there anything important to you about the Santa Cruz River? o Follow-up, probe questions. Show & explain photos. What would you change about the Santa Cruz River, if you could? Is there anything else you d like to add?

Human Subjects Strategy Phase 2: Recruit average residents, broad sociodemographics, incentives & translation 10 Focus Groups in Spring 2011: 8 in Tucson; 1 in Tubac; 1 in Rio Rico. n ~70

Human Subjects Strategy Phase 3: Choice Experiment Development Pre-testing interviews n = 16 OMB Control # 2090-0028; Human Subjects exemption C10-013CS Survey deployment n undetermined

What is The Santa Cruz River? The primary drainage for a multi-national watershed Study unit for an Ecosystem-Portfolio-Model, led by USGS Formerly many reaches perennial, now ephemeral or effluent-dominated in the U.S. Two reaches designated as Navigable Historically significant for human settlement 1942 1989 Photos: Bob Webb, USGS