NCHRP 8-61 Travel Demand Forecasting: Parameters and Techniques



Similar documents
NCHRP 8-84/Report 735: Long-Distance and Rural Transferable Parameters for Statewide Travel Forecasting Models

NCHRP Report 765 Overview. Rob Bostrom August 15, 2014 ARC Model Users Group

Transportation Education Series: Travel Demand Modeling. David Reinke November 2012

How To Plan A City Of Korea

IDAHO STATEWIDE TRIP GENERATION RATES AND FRICTION FACTORS

Ohio Standard Small/Medium MPO Travel Demand Forecasting Model. Theoretical Training May 10-11, 2006 Abridged to Freight Focus Sept 2010

INDIANA STATEWIDE TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL UPGRADE

Anchorage Travel Model Calibration and Validation

Practical Approach to Deriving Peak-Hour Estimates from 24-Hour Travel Demand Models

Final Report: Validation and Sensitivity Considerations for Statewide Models. NCHRP Project 836-B Task 91

Simulating Traffic for Incident Management and ITS Investment Decisions

REVIEW OF THE CURRENT DALLAS-FORT WORTH REGIONAL TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL

TCRP Report 153: Guidelines for Providing Access to Public Transportation Stations. Part 2: Station Typology and Mode of Access Planning Tool

The Four Step Model UCI-ITS-WP Michael G. McNally

HERS_IN. HIGHWAY ECONOMIC REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM (for) INDIANA. AASHTO Transportation Estimator Association Conference October 16, 2001

Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) Statewide Travel Model Peer Review Report

CAMPO TRAVEL DEMAND MODEL DOCUMENTATION. capital area metropolitan planning organization

INDOT Long Range Plan

Model Validation and Reasonableness Checking Manual

MODE CHOICE MODELING FOR LONG-DISTANCE TRAVEL

Nashville Freight Model. Max Baker, Nashville MPO Rob Bostrom, WSA July 17, 2008 Tennessee MUG

Level Crossing Crash Taxonomy for Connected Vehicle Safety Research

AASHTO SCOPM MAP-21 Checklist

Long-Distance Trip Generation Modeling Using ATS

The world s most popular transportation modeling suite

A Case for Real-Time Monitoring of Vehicular Operations at Signalized Intersections

final report MAG Internal Truck Travel Survey and Truck Model Development Study Maricopa Association of Governments Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

Summary Report. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC) (Philadelphia MPO) Travel Demand Model Peer Review

A Framework for Monitoring the Performance of Travel Demand Management and Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Reduction Activities

CHAPTER 2 Land Use and Transportation

Memorandum. 1.0 Introduction. 1.1 Background. Mark Moran, COG/TPB Staff. Jay Evans, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. DATE: November 11, 2015

2040 Southeast Florida Regional Freight Plan

Ohio Department of Transportation

The Economic Cost of Traffic Congestion in Florida. Final Document Contract FDOT BDK (UF # )

Applications for Interactive Transportation Planning GIS (TPGIS)

Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Transportation Infrastructure Investment Prioritization: Responding to Regional and National Trends and Demands Jeremy Sage

HOW WILL PROGRESS BE MONITORED? POLICY AREA. 1. Implement the 2040 Growth Concept and local adopted land use and transportation plans

4-Step truck model: SCAG case study

Presented by: Dr. Senanu Ashiabor, Intermodal Logistics Consulting Inc. at 2015 North Carolina MPO Conference April 30, 2015

Motor Vehicle Crashes, Injuries, and Deaths in Relation to Driver Age: United States,

Performance Elements

City of Rockville Regional Development Impacts: Transportation Capacity Analysis. June, 2013

Transportation Research Needs in National Parks: A Summary and Exploration of Future Trends

Traffic Forecasting. Resource Guidebook. Florida Department of Transportation District Five

Road Transportation of Freight Turnover Measures and Practices at the U.S. Census Bureau

Surface Transportation Program (STP) Projects

Access Spacing and Accidents

National Travel Demand Forecasting Model Phase I Final Scope

San Francisco Travel Demand Forecasting Model Development San Francisco County Transportation Authority Cambridge Systematics, Inc.

The Fresno COG Travel Demand Forecasting Model How the Pieces Fit Together

Development of a Computer-Based Training (CBT) Course for the FSUTMS Comprehensive Modeling Workshop

Transportation Planning Manual

Review of Travel Demand Forecasting Requirements in the SDDOT

Update on the Development of MAP 21 Performance Measures

Overview of the Travel Demand Forecasting Methodology

Appendix C: Toll Sensitivity Analysis

PRIORITIZATION PROCESSES

Affordable Auto Insurance

Knoxville Regional Transportation Planning Organization. Certification Review Report. April 2012

Market Research and Implementation Plan

Highway Economic Requirements Modeling and Data Integration

NCHRP 3-65: Applying Roundabouts in the United States Preliminary Findings

Incorporating Peak Spreading into a WebTAG Based Demand Model

An Integrated Framework to Analyze Interactions between Air and Road Modes in a Regional Transportation System

Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There?

Frederick J. Beier. Professor Emeritus, Marketing and Logistics Management. Carlson School of Management University of Minnesota

4. Suppose that an airline company s long-run production depends only upon labour according to the following function: Passenger-Miles (PM) = AL α

The Northwest Arkansas Travel Demand Model

VEHICLE SURVIVABILITY AND TRAVEL MILEAGE SCHEDULES

Transcription:

NCHRP 8-61 Travel Demand Forecasting: Parameters and Techniques presented to Tennessee Model Users Group Prepared by David Kurth and Thomas Rossi Updated and Presented by Robert G. Schiffer, AICP Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March 28, 2012 Transportation leadership you can trust.

Presentation Outline Project Overview Analysis of NHTS Data Data from existing MPO models What s in the guidebook? Next Steps NCHRP 8-84: Rural and Long- Distance Transferable Parameters 1

Project Overview Background 1978 NCHRP Report 187 Quick Response Urban Travel Estimation Techniques and Transferable Parameters 1998 NCHRP Report 365 Travel Estimation Techniques for Urban Planning 2011 Project 8-61 Travel Demand Forecasting: Parameters and Techniques 2

Project Overview Project Panel, Staff, and Research Agency Team NCHRP Staff for Project 8-61 Nanda Srinivasan, Sr. Pgm. Officer Lori Sundstrom, Sr. Pgm. Officer Project 8-61 Panel Thomas Kane (Chair) Michael Bruff Ed Christopher Nathan Erlbaum Jerry Everett Bruce Griesenbeck Herbert Levinson Richard Pratt Bijan Sartipi Shuming Yan Dick Pratt Kim Fisher (TRB Liaison) Ken Cervenka (DOT Liaison) Research Agency Team Cambridge Systematics, Inc. In Association With Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Martin/Alexiou/Bryson, PLLC Gallop Corporation Dr. Chandra R. Bhat Shapiro Transportation Consulting, LLC Principal Investigator Thomas Rossi 3

Project Overview Objectives Revise and Update NCHRP Report 365 Current travel characteristics Guidance on forecasting Procedures Applications Develop User-Friendly Guidebook Range of approaches Application of straightforward techniques Optional use of default (transferable) parameters References to more sophisticated techniques Broad range of transportation planning issues 4

Project Overview Status to Date Trip Generation Model Forecast Year Socioeconomic Data Analysis of 2001 NHTS data Analysis of MPO model documentation Guidebook finalized Case studies completed/documented Feedback Loop External Trip Generation and Distribution Models External Vehicle Trip Tables by Time Period Internal Productions and Attractions by Purpose Forecast Year Highway Network Forecast Year Transit Network No Trip Distribution Model Production/Attraction Person Trip Tables by Purpose Time of Day Model Person and Vehicle Trip Tables by Purpose/Time Period Mode Choice Model Person and Vehicle Trip Tables by Mode/Purpose/Time Period Highway Assignment CHECK: Input and output times consistent? Yes Transit Assignment Transit Volumes/ Times by Time Period Truck Trip Generation and Distribution Models Truck Vehicle Trip Tables by Purpose Truck Time of Day Model Truck Vehicle Trip Tables by Time Period Highway Volumes/ Times by Time Period Input Data Model Output Model Component Decision 5

Analysis of NHTS Data Process Information developed for four variables of interest Person trip production rates Per household by trip purpose Reported average trip durations By mode and trip purpose Time of day of travel distributions By trip purpose Vehicle occupancy By trip purpose Variables selected based on potential for transferability 6

Analysis of NHTS Data Classifications Trip purposes used for data summaries Home based work Home based school Home based non-work Home based other Non-home based 7 Urban area population classifications (from 2009 NHTS) 1 million + with subway/rail; 1 million + without subway/rail 500k to 1 million 200k to 500k 50k to 200k Not in urban area

Analysis of NHTS Data Sample Tabulations Sample trip production tabulation (2009) Home based work - MSA population less than 250,000 Workers Autos 0 1 2 3+ Avg 0 0.0 1.2 2.3 1.6 0.6 1 0.0 1.0 1.7 4.7 0.7 2 0.0 1.3 2.5 2.8 1.7 3+ 0.0 1.2 2.5 3.7 2.3 Avg 0.0 1.1 2.4 3.6 1.5 8

Analysis of NHTS Data Sample Tabulations Sample trip length tabulation (2009) Home based work Average travel time in minutes MSA Population18 Auto Transit Non- Motorized All Modes Greater than 3 million 29 56 18 31 Between 1 and 3 million 24 48 19 25 Between 500,000 and 1 million 24 53 14 24 Between 250,000 and 500,000 21 30 11 21 Less than 250,000 20 59 11 20 Not in MSA 21 57 8 21 All trips 25 55 15 26 9

Data from Existing MPO Models Process Information from over 70 MPOs Small, medium, large Direct contact or publicly available reports Information collected Model parameters Trip attraction rates Friction factor parameters Mode choice parameters Volume-delay function parameters Model methods used 10

Data from Existing MPO Models Sample Tabulation 11 Sample gamma function gravity model parameters (home based work) b c Large MPO 1 0.503-0.078 Large MPO 2-1.650-0.040 Large MPO 3-0.156-0.045 Medium MPO 1-0.812-0.037 Medium MPO 2-0.388-0.117 Medium MPO 3-0.020-0.123 Small MPO 1-0.265-0.040 Small MPO 2 0.850-0.200

Data from Existing MPO Models Sample Gamma Function Comparison (Home Based Work) Small 1 Small 2 12

What s in the Guidebook? Chapter 1. Introduction Purpose, objectives, and roadmap Summary of modeling process How parameters used Chapter 2. Planning Applications Context Planning context affect on model Examples from urban areas 13

What s in the Guidebook? (continued) Chapter 3. Development of Data 14 Purposes Model development Model validation Model application Considerations Limitations of typical data Primary and secondary data sources Conversion of data from secondary sources Network coding procedures

What s in the Guidebook? (continued) 15 Chapter 4. Model Components Discusses each model component 1.00 Each subsection presents: 0.80 A brief description of best 0.60 practice(s) 0.40 0.20 Basis for development of 0.00 parameters Parameters classified by urban area category Explanations of use in model Estimation Validation Parameter transfer Congested / Free Flow Speed Ratio 1.20 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 V/C Large MPO Large MPO Large MPO Large MPO Large MPO Large MPO Large MPO Large MPO Large MPO Large MPO Large MPO Large MPO Medium MPO Medium MPO Medium MPO Medium MPO Small MPO Average Curve

What s in the Guidebook? (continued) Chapter 4 subsections Vehicle Availability Trip Generation Trip Distribution External Travel Time-of-Day Characteristics Truck/Freight Modeling Highway Assignment Transit Assignment Mode Choice Automobile Occupancy 16

What s in the Guidebook? (continued) Chapter 4 appendices 17 % of HHs by number of vehicles by U.S. metro area Coefficients for logit vehicle availability models 1 vehicle HHs 2 vehicle HHs 3+ vehicle HHs Mean trip length in minutes by purpose and mode by population range Trip production rates by population size and purpose: HBW HBNW NHB HBSC HBO (nonwork, nonschool) Time-of-day distributions by purpose and direction

What s in the Guidebook? (continued) Chapter 5. Model Validation Process Validation overview Consistent with other sources Appropriate outreferences Not duplication of existing references Basic guidance Focus on information in the guidebook 18

What s in the Guidebook? (continued) Chapter 6. Advanced Modeling Practices Overview Tour and activity based approaches Traffic microsimulation 19 Chapter 7. Case Study Application(s) Two studies Smaller urban area with little transit Larger area with transit Illustrate use of the information from Chapters 4 and 5 Draw on concepts presented guidebook Similar to approach in NCHRP Report 365

Next Steps Publication of Final Report 20 Related study in progress NCHRP 8-84, Long-Distance and Rural Transferable Parameters for Statewide Models Conduct Review of Long-Distance Data Sources - complete Review of Statewide Model Long-Distance Trips - complete Prepare Interim Report - complete Implement Approved Analytical Plan - underway Prepare Guidebook with Executive Summary complete by Summer 2012

Contact Information Nanda Srinivasan, Senior Program Officer National Cooperative Highway Research Program Transportation Research Board of the National Academies 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 202-334-1896 nsrinivasan@nas.edu Thomas Rossi, Principal Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 100 CambridgePark Drive, Suite 400 Cambridge, MA 02140 617-354-0167 trossi@camsys.com 21 NCHRP 8-84 Rob Schiffer, Principal Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 1566 Village Square Boulevard, Suite 2 Tallahassee, FL 32309 850-219-6388 rschiffer@camsys.com