Better reporting. Utah DOT s data and planning tools provide a guide to the future and power of network-level asset data ASSET MANAGEMENT



Similar documents
Asset Management for MAP-21. Gary Lasham, P.E. Jonathan Pollack

Successful performance management serves as

Intergraph Roadway Information Management Solution. Title Title. Title Title. A White Paper

Principles for Authorization of the Surface Transportation Program

Transportation Asset Management Case Studies. Presented by. Managing and Maintaining Roadway assets. The Utah Journey


SURFACE TRANSPORTATION. DOT Is Progressing toward a Performance-Based Approach, but States and Grantees Report Potential Implementation Challenges

Kentucky Sign Management System

Word Count: Body Text = 5, ,000 (4 Figures, 4 Tables) = 7,500 words

Butch Wlaschin P.E. Director, Office of Asset Management, Pavements, and Construction FHWA

Stephen Gaj. Martin Kidner State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT

Risk-Based Asset Management Plan. Risk-Based Asset. Management Plan

I N V O I C E. Support AASHTO s FY 2016 participation in all Engineering Technical Service Programs.

A GUIDE TO COLLECTING, PROCESSING, AND MANAGING ROADWAY ASSET INVENTORY DATA FINAL REPORT

Asset Management Plan

Types of Data. Features. Getting Started. Integrated Roadway Asset Management System

Earth Retaining Structures

A Legislative Briefing prepared by Volume 7, Number 1 February 2001

Management System Support Tool

Integrating GIS-Based Videolog and Asset Data With Commonly Used Systems Provides Major Benefits With Minimal Effort

Chapter 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION CHAPTER 4 ASSET INVENTORY AND CONDITION PAGE 33

Performance-Based Planning and Programming

The Indiana Experience

New Mexico DOT Transportation Asset Management Implementation Plan. final plan

Summary of MAP-21 Matrix

Monitoring Highway Assets with Remote Technology

Improved Decision-Making Through Effective Asset Management

Best Practices in Transportation Asset Management: U.S. Experience

12MAP-21, a funding and authorization bill to govern U.S. federal surface MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION AND PERFORMANCE

How To Modernize And Maintain Roads, Highways And Bridges In Maine

Asset Management Decision Support System Model. Technical Report. Submitted by. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. NJDOT Research Project Manager

Traffic Signal Asset Management. Edward Fok USDOT/FHWA Resource Center

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. LINKING PLANNING and THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT GUIDANCE

Northwest Region Division of Transportation Bureau of Indian Affairs

Use of GIS in Planning and Asset Management

A. System. City of Perrysburg, Ohio URISA EXEMPLARY SYSTEMS IN GOVERNMENT AWARD

Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

Division Review Guidelines

AASHTO First Take at the New Surface Transportation Bill FIXING AMERICA S SURFACE TRANSPORTATION (FAST) ACT December 2, 2015

HERS_IN. HIGHWAY ECONOMIC REQUIREMENTS SYSTEM (for) INDIANA. AASHTO Transportation Estimator Association Conference October 16, 2001

GIS DATA CAPTURE APPLICATIONS MANDLI COMMUNICATIONS

NEW JERSEY TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Cross Asset Management Revamped Revisiting Asset Manager NT and PT Presented by : Jose Aldayuz, PE IHEEP Conference New Orleans

Land Mobile Mapping & Survey

Advanced Enterprise Work and Asset Management for Performance-Driven Utilities

AASHTO 2015 EXTREME WEATHER SESSIONS

How To Manage Big Data For The Ohio Department Of Transportation

CHAPTER 2 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Cost-Effective Collection of a Network-Level Asset Inventory. Michael Nieminen, Roadware

PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

MAP 21 themes. Strengthens America s highway and public transportation systems. Supports the Department s aggressive safety agenda

Road Asset Management

LogicTree Corporation Open Roads Consulting

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SAFETY DATA PROCESSES AND GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON

LARGE PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT

IBM asset and service management solutions White paper. Asset and service management for Departments of Transportation.

NEVADA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Using Cloud-Computing to Promote Asset Management Best Practices A Ministry of Transportation Ontario Case Study

CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

South Carolina Multimodal Transportation Plan Vision, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures

IT Infrastructure Problems for Asset Management

Where Do We Want to Go? How Can We Get There?

Transportation Asset Management Today: An Evaluation of an Emerging Virtual Community of Practice

ASSET MANAGEMENT. ASHE East Penn Web-Ex October 17th, Asset Management The right solution at the right time. 1

Visualizing Pavement Management Data at the Project Level

Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. Initial Transportation Asset Management Plan (Pilot Version February 2015)

CONVERGENCE OF MMS AND PAVEMENT INSPECTION SENSORS FOR COMPLETE ROAD ASSESSMENT

Preliminary Investigation Caltrans Division of Research and Innovation

ADDENDUM NO (1) One RFP 14-PW-012 Mobile Asset Data Collection/Sign Inventory

Asset Management Highway Division Plan

Date: 10/10/2014 Initiated by: AAS-100

RANDOM/GRID BLOCK CRACKING EXTREME SEVERITY. Transverse Cracking- Extreme Severity. Alligator Cracking- High. Severity

Chapter 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK CHAPTER 2 ASSET MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING FRAMEWORK PAGE 11

TRANSPORTATION Carson Howell, Analyst

Transportation Risk Management: International Practices for Program Development and Project Delivery

Update on the Development of MAP 21 Performance Measures

Analysis of the 2015 Senate Surface Transportation Reauthorization Plan: The DRIVE Act

CONNECTICUT S TOP TRANSPORTATION ISSUES:

THE WORLD IS TALKING ABOUT BIG DATA. ITS Canada Annual Conference 2014

Integrating the I-95 Vehicle Probe Project Data and Analysis Tools into the FAMPO Planning Program

Project Overview Mapping Technology Assessment for Connected Vehicle Highway Network Applications

manageservices Managed Services for Intelligent Infrastructure

INDOT Long Range Plan

Automated Pavement Distress Survey: A Review and A New Direction

Population Analytics. Population Analytics: A New Opportunity for Mobile Operators. » Mobile Operators POPULATION ANALYTICS BENEFITS AT A GLANCE

(This Page Intentionally Left Blank)

NASCIO 2007 Recognition Awards Nomination. Michigan. Title of Nomination: Transportation Asset Investment Reporting & Management System

Session West Virginia DOT's Dashboard Transportation Data in a Dash

Improved signal operations with smooth and equitable traffic flow are goals for most. Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measures

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

How To Improve Road Quality

FHWA Update. AASHTO Subcommittee On Construction 2013 Annual Meeting Detroit, MI

How does CDOT rank among state DOTs?

SF Bay Area Transportation Management Systems: An Innovative DOT and MPO Partnership

Safer Streets for New York City

How To Manage Transportation Asset Management

Performance Elements

Visualize your World. Democratization i of Geographic Data

Maryland Work Zone Accidents Comparison May 2005

Transcription:

ASSET MANAGEMENT Better reporting Utah DOT s data and planning tools provide a guide to the future and power of network-level asset data By Robert Dingess Contributing Author W hile the U.S. DOT works feverishly to complete MAP-21 s new bridge, pavement and asset-management data requirements, the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) provides a guide for how to use public-private partnerships to take risk-based asset management to a whole new level and create the type of management system envisioned by Congress. 42 January 2014 ROADS&BRIDGES

The passage of MAP-21 by Congress in 2012 officially transitioned the primary federal focus in surface transportation from interstate and National Highway System (NHS) construction to system management. There is a growing sense among policy makers that with each passing day, increased congestion in key corridors is hurting interstate commerce and U.S. global competitiveness. Before coalescing on new funding mechanisms, policy makers streamlined current federal-aid programs and seek better asset-management, condition and performance data. The current legislative director for Sen. James Inhofe, Alex Herrgott, worked on MAP- 21 s data-policy sections. MAP-21 s data and reporting requirement provisions were designed to help effectively demonstrate the impact of an increasingly dysfunctional National Highway System on GDP and the economy, Herrgott explained. Every day we become less competitive as our transportation system becomes increasingly inefficient. We need better tools to demonstrate needs and effective management practices that maximize the current investment. MAP-21 provides an opportunity for states to build a 21st-century management style so serious conversations on levels of investment can occur from a common and credible platform of needs data. According to Herrgott, officials were mindful of transportation investments being made in China, Brazil and beyond: The economic life s blood of the interior of the country is our transportation network. As these networks become less and less efficient compared to regional and global competitors, businesses will choose to go elsewhere. This is especially true of congestion on the National Highway System. Prior to the 2010 elections, it was presumed that the federal transportation reauthorization bill would be shaped by Chairman James Oberstar of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. His unexpected defeat shifted momentum to the U.S. Senate. By spring 2011, the Senate worked on the final structures that would eventually become MAP-21. New MAP initiative In 2010, Utah s planning and GIS staffs asked program heads to provide spatial data valuable for use by other departments. Traditionally, pavement, bridge, planning, traffic and other data sets were routinely collected and hoarded within division silos. Under this new initiative, data sets were incorporated into an integrated Oracle-based platform. A new web-based content-management system (ESRI ArcGIS) allowed users to analyze integrated data sets to better develop and illustrate planning and investment decisions. Maps were developed that incorporated all the known asset, environmental, planning, traffic-safety and operations data to provide a more complete condition and performance picture of the state s transportation network. Given the web-based nature of the system, it became easier for planners to place increasing amounts of data on the UDOT website. This UPlan initiative to increase transparency and enhance cross-departmental data utilization received acclaim within UDOT, among state legislators, from AASHTO and the U.S. DOT. UPlan became an AASHTO TIG project in 2011, and U.S. DOT would eventually incorporate the UPlan model as an FHWA Every Day Counts initiative for 2013. In spring 2011, Utah s director of asset management, Stan Burns, reviewed various scenarios for updating pavement-distress data. Research into the latest technologies led Burns to a suite of innovative mapping and assetcollection technologies that could capture and inventory every asset within the right-of-way. He immediately thought of UPlan. Utah may not be the show me state, but we believe that a risk-based asset management program is only possible with accurate and reliable data, Burns said. As I discussed what was possible with maintenance, traffic The winning contractor, Mandli Communications, used a mobile platform outfitted with GPS, photolog cameras, a surface profiler, a laser crack measurement system, lidar sensors and a beta version of a sign-retroreflectivity system. Assets were geolocated, categorized and inventoried. UDOT had a rigorous prequalification process for applicants. In fall 2011, UDOT released their Roadway Imaging and Inventory proposal. It called for the collection of 14,000 miles of geolocated road geometry, pavement distress, surfaces, imagery, lane-mile, bridge clearance and sign data. ROADSBRIDGES.com 43

The Utah Transportation Integrated Business System initiative sought to create an environment in which data is accessible through one portal without duplicating or manipulating the data. Maps were developed that incorporated all the known asset, environmental, planning, traffic-safety and operations data to provide a more complete picture of the state s transportation network. safety, planning, our GIS staff and other key members of our leadership team, it became readily apparent that different departments were collecting duplicate data sets and that working together we could invest in a data set worthy of the UPlan system and our assetmanagement goals. One of the major obstacles to investing in new technologies or processes is the lack of internal expertise to ensure quality of results. This project was no different. In developing their request for proposals, Utah s staff developed a rigorous QC/QA testing course. Each potential vendor was required to collect a previously surveyed course, and the vendor s data sets were checked against this baseline for accuracy. Once the data was collected and processed, each qualifying vendor would spend an entire day with UDOT staff demonstrating how data sets could be used within their systems. In fall 2011, UDOT released their Roadway Imaging and Inventory proposal. It called for the collection of 14,000 miles of geolocated road geometry, pavement distress, surfaces, imagery, lane-mile, bridge clearance and sign data. Eventually the contract expanded to require collection of nearly all right-of-way assets. The rigorous prequalification process greatly reduced the number of applicants. The winning contractor, Mandli Communications, used a mobile platform outfitted with GPS, photolog cameras, a surface profiler, a laser crack-measurement system, lidar sensors and a beta version of a sign retroreflectivity system. Assets were geolocated, categorized and inventoried. Vendors mobilize Shortly after President Obama signed MAP-21 into law in Summer 2012, UDOT hosted a meeting in Salt Lake City to introduce this new network-level asset-collection project to their database and system vendors. This Aug. 15 meeting was hosted by Utah Planning Director John Thomas and Stan Burns and included representatives from Utah may not be the show-me state, but we believe that a risk-based asset-management program is only possible with accurate and reliable information. Stan Burns Oracle, ESRI, Deighton, Agile Assets, Bentley Systems and Mandli Communications. The Utah Transportation Integrated Business System (UTIBS) initiative sought to create an environment in which data is accessible through one portal without duplicating or manipulating the data. They wanted to seamlessly incorporate newer versions of data and have all business systems work together. According to UDOT, UPlan would not have been possible without tremendous assistance from ESRI s ArcGIS web-systemdevelopment team. ESRI s team looked at UPlan as an opportunity to demonstrate the horsepower of their newest version of ArcGIS in bringing transportation data to life. As the focus turned to organizing and integrating the enormous sums of lidar and other asset data, the initial focus shifted to Oracle for the data platform and point-cloud analysis, while Deighton and Agile Assets worked to ensure that data could be effectively organized and managed within key departments. Getting vendors to work together on this type of project, however, was a challenge. Given MAP-21 s emphasis on asset management and performance measures, we believed that this type of network-level data collection and utilization would pay great dividends for UDOT and for our vendors, explained Burns. Utah has a relatively small network of roads, and we were offering our vendors an opportunity to use this data to develop enhancements to 44 January 2014 ROADS&BRIDGES

ESRI s team looked at UPlan as an opportunity to demonstrate the horsepower of their newest version of ArcGIS in bringing data to life. their systems that could be offered later in more complex environments. The Aug. 15 meeting resulted in the development of four working subgroups: database (UGate), roadway design, asset management and traffic safety. While the core group of Utah vendors began work on various aspects of organizing the newly collected asset data, word spread quickly about UTIBS. Suddenly, UDOT was being asked by other agencies to educate them on the data-collection project, and other companies were asking for the opportunity to participate in the program. The AAA Foundation offered to work with UDOT to help improve their road-safety analysis by applying principles developed as part of their usrap initiative. The 3M Corp. offered to assist in developing a traffic-signmanagement program. Complete virtual road system UDOT now has a complete asset inventory of every item within the right-of-way, including exactly how much asphalt and concrete make up their state-maintained system. While that is impressive, their asset extraction process also provides the exact size and location of all pavement markings, guardrails, barriers, road signs and light fixtures. The condition and performance of bridges and pavements is integrated into these data sets. The data is collected and organized in a way that gives Burns a great sense of confidence when considering new federal performancemeasure-reporting requirements. While we can secure the linear-referencing-system data from a number of sources, Burns said, this data set allows us to extract any combination of condition, performance or safety data sets that could be requested on our state-maintained portions of the National Highway System. Another key benefit of the new system is its ability to make UDOT smarter when it comes to developing a risk approach to asset management. Operations and safety data combined with the ability to easily geolocate and parse out specific asset data allows us the flexibility to target investments, Burns said. Instead of straightforward corridor-replacement programs, we are able to break out signs or guardrails and only replace based on specific condition issues. An improved understanding of the cost/ benefit of installing and maintaining various types of devices is projected to result in significant cost savings. The planning process also will be enhanced. Thanks to UDOT s UGate, built on the Oracle ROADSBRIDGES.com 45

The passage of MAP-21 by Congress officially transitioned the primary federal focus in surface transportation from interstate and National Highway System construction to system management. platform, and ESRI s ArcGIS system, UDOT will be able to integrate environmental, economic, archaeological and other pertinent data sets into corridor analysis projects. The more we integrate the data needed to make good decisions, the better we reduce the risks associated with project planning. This allows us to streamline the development and project permitting process and avoid sensitive locations, said Frank Pisani, UDOT s GIS manager. Showcasing these facts within UPlan creates confidence and transparency both inside and outside of UDOT that we are creating value and are good stewards of public funds. From virtual road to real safety UDOT s director of traffic safety, Robert Hull, has a reputation of aggressively working to maximize federal and state sources of roadway safety funds to reduce roadway fatalities. Since implementing a Towards Zero Deaths initiative in 2006, Utah traffic fatalities have dropped slightly over 24%. The traffic and safety team was one of the first to understand the value of the UTIBS initiative and is investing in the data collection and working to take full advantage of the system. The combination of photolog, lidar, asset extraction and road geometries gives us an excellent starting point in understanding the role of the road and traffic features in Figure 1. Statewide highway system (5,860 miles). Ride quality forecasted with $188 million/yr fatal crashes, said Hull. When you layer in crash location and local demographic data such as high schools, bars or other high-risk locations the system starts to teach us where we need to focus. This roadway data gives us the information necessary to educate our internal UDOT teams as well as external audiences such as policy makers and lawenforcement agencies. UDOT s traffic safety team is working with ESRI, the AAA Foundation and MRI Global to better evaluate crash data to look for specific trends. We are able to identify high-risk locations from a systemic standpoint and begin to build into our program effective countermeasures, said Hull. UDOT also is beginning to explore the concept of conducting roadway safety audits from their desks using the photolog, geometry, pavement condition, safety device inventories and past crash histories. UDOT has begun work with Brigham Young University to develop statistical models that combine crash and roadway data to help prioritize countermeasure investment. Future benefits UDOT is planning to re-collect the network in 2014 and 2016. The asset extraction from these lidar data sets will be much simpler as algorithms are developed to recognize system changes. The 2014 data collection is slated to include a sign retroreflectivity (nighttime visibility) component. A more accurate set of lidar sensors also will be used to facilitate the use of data for virtual design. Bentley Systems and Virtual Geomatics are working to find new ways to evaluate and even adjust the data being collected to allow for design. UDOT s emphasis on tools such as lidar will likely serve as a catalyst for greater utilization of 3-D modeling in transportation construction. Three-dimensional modeling software creates a more efficient and accurate project planning, design and construction process. When the data is exported from 3-D software it can be incorporated into automated GPS machine-control technologies. While virtual design and cutting-edge construction practices provide considerable payoffs for UDOT s asset management today, their efforts may lay the groundwork for additional game-changing technologies. An accurate lidar base map is a key component for current autonomous vehicle technologies. The 2014 lidar data collection will be accurate enough for vehicle base maps. If UDOT provides open access to this data set, the economic benefit could be considerable as technology and auto companies experiment with the network data to develop algorithms designed at creating a virtual guide rail. As the U.S. DOT continues work on the development of performance measures designed at meeting new Congressional requirements, UDOT provides a model with the transparency and clarity intended by Congress as well as benefits that will pay dividends well beyond the life of MAP-21. Whether it is creating a 21st-century model for transportation asset management or the potential to serve as a catalyst for a new wave of vehicle technologies, it seems as if the road to the future currently runs through Utah. R&B Dingess is president and chief executive officer of the Geospatial Transportation Mapping Association, Washington, D.C. He can be contacted at rdingess@usgtma.com. For more information about this topic, check out the Safety Channel at www.roadsbridges.com. 46 January 2014 ROADS&BRIDGES