Status and Prospects of HARP. Malcolm Ellis On behalf of the HARP Collaboration NuFact02 Imperial College, July 2002



Similar documents
Information about the T9 beam line and experimental facilities

MICE detectors and first results. M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca

Proton tracking for medical imaging and dosimetry

Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR)

Results from first tests of TRD prototypes for CBM. DPG Frühjahrstagung Münster 2011 Pascal Dillenseger Institut für Kernphysik Frankfurt am Main

Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR)

The OPERA Emulsions. Jan Lenkeit. Hamburg Student Seminar, 12 June Institut für Experimentalphysik Forschungsgruppe Neutrinophysik

Neutron Detection Setups proposed for

Testing thermo-acoustic sound generation in water with proton and laser beams

Event viewer for HRS-L

PoS(PhotoDet 2012)068

Cosmic Ray Astrophysics with AMS-02 Daniel Haas - Université de Genève on behalf of the AMS collaboration

IMPROVEMENT OF JET ENERGY RESOLUTION FOR SEGMENTED HCAL USING LAYER WEIGHTING TECHNIQUE

Hadro-Production Experiments: Impact on T2K and LBNE

NATIONAL CENTRE FOR PARTICLE, ASTROPARTICLE AND NUCLEAR PHYSICS

ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI FISICA NUCLEARE

An option for the SHiP Muon Detector: Scintillator bars with WLS fibers and SiPMs readout

Jets energy calibration in ATLAS

Electron Muon Ranger (EMR) Software Development

arxiv: v1 [hep-ex] 27 Dec 2015

Comparisons between 2003 CMS ECAL TB data and a Geant 4 MC

ATLAS Test Beam Analysis in Stockholm: An Overview

A Guide to Detectors Particle Physics Masterclass. M. van Dijk

arxiv: v2 [physics.ins-det] 27 Jul 2010 The CMS Collaboration

Calorimetry in particle physics experiments

07 - Cherenkov and transition radiation detectors

Evaluation Tools for the Performance of a NESTOR Test Detector

Detectors in Nuclear and Particle Physics

Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR)

Some big changes happening JS Graulich has gone Yordan now in charge of DAQ Regrouping everyone involved in the Online Effort Weekly meetings Wed at

Single Electron Detection with the Large Volume Spherical Proportional Counter Ilias Savvidis

The data acquisition system of the XMASS experiment

Icarus and Status of Liquid Argon Technology

GLAST Geant4 Simulation

Cross section, Flux, Luminosity, Scattering Rates

PoS(Kruger 2010)013. Setting of the ATLAS Jet Energy Scale. Michele Petteni Simon Fraser University

The Timing Counter of the MEG experiment: calibration and performances

Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR)

Cherenkov Detector with a Focusing Aerogel Radiator

TPC laser calibration system

3D SCANNERTM. 3D Scanning Comes Full Circle. s u n. Your Most Valuable QA and Dosimetry Tools A / B / C. The 3D SCANNER Advantage

Dose enhancement near metal electrodes in diamond X- ray detectors. A. Lohstroh*, and D. Alamoudi

Stefano Colafranceschi

High Precision Measurement of the Target Mass of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detectors

Silicon Sensors for CMS Tracker at High-Luminosity Environment - Challenges in particle detection -

(Possible) HEP Use Case for NDN. Phil DeMar; Wenji Wu NDNComm (UCLA) Sept. 28, 2015

Calibration of Dallas sensors

Electron-Muon Ranger (EMR)

Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils

Database Architecture for the Calibration of ATLAS Monitored Drift Tube Chambers

Status and perspective of emission imaging techniques for ion beam therapy in Lyon

The accurate calibration of all detectors is crucial for the subsequent data

The Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment. CMS Note. Mailing address: CMS CERN, CH-1211 GENEVA 23, Switzerland

A TOOLKIT FOR STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF DATA DISTRIBUTIONS

Jet Reconstruction in CMS using Charged Tracks only

Optical Link ASICs for LHC Upgrades

Single photon detection with H8500 MAPMTs for the CBM RICH detector*

AGATA The Advanced Gamma Ray Tracking Array

Evaluation of various planar gaseous detectors with CsI photocathodes. for the detection of primary scintillation light from noble gases

T(CR)3IC Testbed for Coherent Radio Cherenkov Radiation from Cosmic-Ray Induced Cascades

AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE USEFULNESS OF THE ISOCS MATHEMATICAL EFFICIENCY CALIBRATION FOR LARGE RECTANGULAR 3 x5 x16 NAI DETECTORS

A J2EE based server for Muon Spectrometer Alignment monitoring in the ATLAS detector Journal of Physics: Conference Series

CMS Physics Analysis Summary

Tracking systems in HEP:

DIEGO TONINI MORPHOLOGY OF NIOBIUM FILMS SPUTTERED AT DIFFERENT TARGET SUBSTRATE ANGLE

HTRA Instrumentation I

Nara Women s University, Nara, Japan B.A. Honors in physics 2002 March 31 Thesis: Particle Production in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions

Image Processing Techniques applied to Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber(LArTPC) Data

Development of on line monitor detectors used for clinical routine in proton and ion therapy

Experimental study of beam hardening artefacts in photon counting breast computed tomography

Operation and Performance of the CMS Silicon Tracker

Abderrahman El Kharrim

1 Experiments (Brahms, PHENIX, and STAR)

Particle ID Distinguishing Particles. We have decided now to identify the particle species by a bar code

Physics Validation Task Force Status Update. A. Dotti for the Physics Validation Task Force 18 th Collaboration Meeting Seville, Spain

Study of the B D* ℓ ν with the Partial Reconstruction Technique


Experimental studies and simulations of spallation neutron production on a thick lead target

M. A. Nitti, M. Colasuonno, E. Nappi, A. Valentini

The CMS analysis chain in a distributed environment

Calibrations, alignment, online data monitoring

Synthetic Sensing: Proximity / Distance Sensors

Rate estimates on the Gem Disks

Precision Tracking Test Beams at the DESY-II Synchrotron. Simon Spannagel DPG 2014 T88.7 Mainz,

Neutrino Physics in Switzerland

IR Sensor Module for Reflective Sensor, Light Barrier, and Fast Proximity Applications

High Energy Physics. Lecture 4 More kinematics and a picture show of particle collisions

COLLEGE ON MEDICAL PHYSICS

PROSPECT: Precision Reactor Oscillation and Spectrum experiment

The Mainz LXe TPC MC simulations for a Compton scattering experiment

The performance of the CMS muon detector in proton-proton collisions at s = 7 TeV at the

Round Table Italy-Russia at Dubna

RICH. INFN Perugia INFN Firenze CERN. M.Lenti

Performance of the CMS cathode strip chambers with cosmic rays

PIPELINE INSPECTION UTILIZING ULTRASOUND TECHNOLOGY: ON THE ISSUE OF RESOLUTION By, M. Beller, NDT Systems & Services AG, Stutensee, Germany

How To Build A Hall D Detector

The TOTEM experiment at the LHC: results and perspective

Brookhaven Magnet Division - Nuclear Physics Program Support Activities

POSSIBL-E EXPERIMENTS ON THE 200-GeV ACCELERATOR. A. D. Krisch University of Michigan. R. Serber Columbia University.

Project Management Web Tools at the MICE Experiment. Linda R. Coney UC Riverside CHEP May 2012

Transcription:

Status and Prospects of HARP Malcolm Ellis On behalf of the HARP Collaboration NuFact02 Imperial College, July 2002

The HARP Collaboration: Università degli Studi e Sezione INFN, Bari, Italy Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, UK Institut für Physik, Universität Dortmund, Germany Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, JINR Dubna, Russia Università degli Studi e Sezione INFN, Ferrara, Italy CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Section de Physique, Université de Genève, Switzerland Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro dell' INFN, Legnaro, Italy Institut de Physique Nucléaire, UCL, Louvain-la- Neuve, Belgium Università degli Studi e Sezione INFN, Milano, Italy P.N. Lebedev Institute of Physics (FIAN), Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow, Russia Università "Federico II" e Sezione INFN, Napoli, Italy Nuclear and Astrophysics Laboratory, University of Oxford, UK Università degli Studi e Sezione INFN, Padova, Italy LPNHE, Université de Paris VI et VII, Paris, France Institute for High Energy Physics, Protvino, Russia Università "La Sapienza" e Sezione INFN Roma I, Roma, Italy Università degli Studi e Sezione INFN Roma III, Roma, Italy Dept. of Physics, University of Sheffield, UK Faculty of Physics, St Kliment Ohridski University, Sofia, Bulgaria Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy, Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria Università di Trieste e Sezione INFN, Trieste, Italy Univ. de Valencia, Spain 2

Outline Motivation Timeline The Detector Data taking: 2001 2002 Software/Analysis Prospects 3

Motivation Neutrino Factory Atmospheric Neutrinos Monte Carlo K2K and MiniBooNE Experiments Aim: Measure Hadronic d σ /dp T /dp L over range of momenta, target Z and thickness Few% accuracy over all phase space, requires ~10 6 events per setting and low systematics. 4

Timeline Proposed: November 1999 Approved: February 2000 Technical Run: September 2000 Data Taking: Solid Targets: 2001 Solid & Cryogenic Targets: 2002 5

The Detector Main Requirements: Acceptance, PID, Redundancy Beam instrumentation provides tracking and PID of incoming particle. TPC surrounds target to provide close to 4π coverage. Forward Spectrometer covers insensitive region of TPC. PID completed with Cherenkov, TOF and Calorimetry. 6

The HARP Detector 7

Particle ID Coverage TPC TPC TOF TOF Cherenkov 8

CERN PS East Hall 9

HARP in 2001 10

Beam and Targets Beam: ±3 ±5 ±8 ±12 ±15 GeV/c Solid Targets: Be, C, Al, Cu, Sn, Ta, Pb Thin (2%) Thick (100%) 5% Targets (New) MiniBooNE K2K Skew Copper Alignment Cryogenic Targets: H 2 /D 2 N 2 /O 2 target tube target holder Extrapolated position of MWPC tracks at the target 11

Cryogenic Targets Targets 2cm diameter, 6cm long. Two distinct setups: N 2 /O 2 Mid July H 2 /D 2 Early August Filling takes 4-6 hours. Emptying takes ~1 hour. element H 2 D 2 N 2 O 2 boiling temp. 20.4 K 23.6 K 77.4 K 99.2 K # λ 0.84 % 2.13 % 5.52 % 7.52 % 12

2001 Data Taking Completed 1/3 of Solid Target Programme: 13

2002 Data Taking Programme (May-September): Thick Targets 5% Targets +ve and ve beams Remaining Solid Targets Cryogenic Targets (start 8 th July) MiniBooNE Programme (12 th August) K2K Programme (26 th August) 14

Trigger Forward trigger plane (FTP) beam γ δ Consequence: 1/2 to 2/3 of our thin-target data are noninteracting beam particles Inner Trigger Cilinder (ITC) Solution: Non-Interacting Beam (NIB) veto counters under study 5% Targets 15

Software Processes Stringent time schedule required adoption of software engineering standards. Domains identification & dependency structure lead to: definition of releasable units (libraries and source code), definition of working groups (and schedules), definition of ordering for unit&system testing and for release. DetResponse DetResponse HarpUI HarpUI Reconstruction Reconstruction Simulation Simulation Event Event Selector Selector Objy Objy Persistency Persistency DetRep DetRep ObjyHarp ObjyHarp ObjectCnv ObjectCnv HarpDD HarpDD HarpEvent HarpEvent Gaudi Gaudi Framework Framework DAQ DAQ ROOT ROOT GEANT4 GEANT4 CLHEP CLHEP + + STL STL HEPODBMS HEPODBMS Objectivity Objectivity DATE DATE 16

Software/Analysis DAQ and detectors readout (DATE). Storage and retrieval of physics data and settings (Objectivity DB, AMS-HPSS interface). Framework including application manager, interfaces & data exchange for the components, and event model (GAUDI). Physics Simulation & Detector Model (GEANT4). Physics Reconstruction for all detectors. Online Monitoring & Offline Calibration of detectors. User Interface and Event Display (ROOT). Foundation libs & Utilities (STL, CLHEP). 17

Beam Instrumentation Beam Particles tracked by 4 MWPCs Particle ID performed by: Cherenkov, TOF, µ identifier 18

TPC Gas Choice: 90% Ar, 10% C0 2 Gas Speed 5cm/µs Total drift time: 32 µs 320 time samples Cross-Talk problems under investigation 19

TPC Reconstructed Tracks P T for all TPC Tracks P T vs P L for Thick Target Data 20

RPCs 21

RPC/TPC Matching RPC are fully efficient and noise-free RPC timing removes off-time tracks 2 mm stesalite wall Target (fixed to the magnet) (fixed to the TPC) 22

NOMAD Drift Chambers Efficiency reduced due to change of gas: 90% Ar, 9% CO 2, 1% CH 4 Calibration and Alignment ongoing 23

Cherenkov Gas Leakage problem emerged in the commissioning phase: Support structure re-welded Epoxy-treatment of inner surfaces. Leak rate ~ 4L/hour Specifications: 4 L/hour. Density monitored by sonar techniques (acoustic wave phase shift) <1% precision. Thresholds: π 2.6 GeV/c κ 9.3 GeV/c p 17.6 GeV/c 24

TOF Wall Calibration: Laser Cosmic Rays Pulse Calibration Example: time separation and resolution for 3 GeV/c beam particles. pions protons 25

Calorimeter Three modules: 62 EM (4cm), 80 HAD (8cm) & Muon Identifier Electron Identifier (EM+HAD) 6.72m wide x 3.3m high. Muon Identifier is 6.44 Interaction Lengths of Iron and Scintillator slabs. 26

Prospects Complete Data-Taking 30 th September Analyses Initially Separated: Large Angle (TPC/RPC) Small Angle (Forward Spectrometer) Expect to overcome TPC cross-talk problems, thus achieve design accuracy. Aiming for initial results by the end of this year. 27