Profile of California s Teaching Standards

Similar documents
MCOE TEACHER CREDENTIALING PROGRAM/ INDUCTION HANDBOOK

PRO-NET. A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. April 2001

Arkansas Teaching Standards

Section Three: Ohio Standards for Principals

Commission on Teacher Credentialing. Education Specialist Clear Program Standards

Section Two: Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession

Conceptual Framework Standards. Component Evidence Delivery Assessment Check one or both Type of Instrument Used Conceptual Framework

NAAS - inacol Standards for Quality Online Programs

COMMISSION ON TEACHER CREDENTIALING. Supporting English Learners with Disabilities Symposium May 3, 2016

TOOL KIT for RESIDENT EDUCATOR and MENT OR MOVES

North Carolina Professional Technology Facilitator Standards

Special Education Student Learning Outcomes

Hawaii Teacher Standards Board Teacher Leader Work Group Report

Master s in Educational Leadership Ed.S. in Administration and Supervision

Setting Professional Goals*

South Carolina Literacy Competencies. for Reading Coaches

ASU College of Education Course Syllabus ED 4972, ED 4973, ED 4974, ED 4975 or EDG 5660 Clinical Teaching

CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY ADMINISTRATIVE CREDENTIAL EXAMINATION (CPACE)

YOUNG FIVES PROGRAM THREE-YEAR SINGLE PLAN FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT. Palo Alto Unified School District

RENEWING CAREER AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION IN COLORADO

Program Outcomes and STRIVE: Expectations for Reflective, Principled Educators at California Lutheran University

Literacy Specialist Endorsement

Utah Educational Leadership Standards, Performance Expectations and Indicators

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s Instructional Technology Facilitators

Illinois Professional Teaching Standards

ADEPT Performance Standards. for. Classroom-Based Teachers

Illinois State Board Of Education Adopted June 2000 CONTENT-AREA STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS

TEACHER INDUCTION PROGRAM & APPLICATION

GLOBAL-READY TEACHER COMPETENCY FRAMEWORK: STANDARDS AND INDICATORS

Charles A. Szuberla, Jr.

Principal has shared the school vision and goals with the staff. A process for developing a school vision and goals is not evident.

Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6)

Illinois State Board of Education

St. Charles School District. Counselor Growth Guide and. Evaluation Documents

PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1: Vision, Mission, and Goals

CALIFORNIA S TEACHING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS (TPE)

Ohio Standards for School Counselors

QUALITY INDICATORS FOR ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES RESEARCH-BASED REVISIONS, 2004

Secondary Program Descriptions

Instructional Materials in California. An Overview of Standards, Curriculum Frameworks, Instructional Materials Adoptions, and Funding

FLORIDA TEACHER STANDARDS for ESOL ENDORSEMENT 2010

Alignment Table School Counseling. Austin Peay State University Professional Educational Standards, CACREP STANDARDS, and NCATE Standards

Rubric for Evaluating NC s School Counselors +

Project Management Institute STRATEGIC PLAN. Prepared by: PMI Board of Directors

TENNESSEE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION

Curriculum Management

LITERACY: READING LANGUAGE ARTS

1. Candidates understand the theoretical and evidence-based foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction as follows:

Lincoln Park Public Schools Special Education Teacher Consultant Evaluation

Domain 1 for Special Education: Planning and Preparation Component Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Proficient Excellent

Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems

WV School Counseling Program Audit

Leadership Through Strategic Discussions Between Supervising Administrator and Principals

Teacher Evaluation. Missouri s Educator Evaluation System

Murray State University COURSE SYLLABUS. DEPARTMENT: Educational Studies, Leadership & Counseling CREDIT HOURS: 3

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUUM OF TEACHING STANDARDS

Illinois Center for School Improvement Framework: Core Functions, Indicators, and Key Questions

Reading Competencies

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

Learning. Framework for Teaching and

The residency school counselor program does not prepare candidates to design, deliver, and

School-Based Teacher Educators Take On New Roles In Professional Development Schools. Richard E. Ishler University of South Carolina

Multiple Subjects Program Assessment Plan Spring 2001

PROGRAM DIRECTOR OF BILINGUAL/ESL ELEMENTARY EDUCATION

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

DRAFT * Statewide Strategic Plan for Science * DRAFT DRAFT * For Board of Regents Discussion * DRAFT. Mission

ELL Program Road Maps INTRODUCTION

Principal Practice Observation Tool

Curriculum and Instruction: A 21st Century Skills Implementation Guide

How To Improve The Curriculum At Minnetonka School District

Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

DRAFT For use in validation process only Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina s School counselors

School of Education MASTER OF ARTS IN TEACHING. Master of Arts in Teaching

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Advancing Excellence in Technological Literacy: Student Assessment, Professional Development, and Program Standards

Teacher Observation Form

WV School Counseling Program Audit

SUSTAINABILITY. Goal: Sustain environmental literacy by ensuring effective implementation of the 2010 Environmental Literacy for Illinois Plan.

NATIONAL COMPETENCY-BASED TEACHER STANDARDS (NCBTS) A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDE FOR FILIPINO TEACHERS

Standards for School Counseling

Choosing to Renew Your Certification

North Carolina School Library Media Coordinators Standards

PRO-NET A Publication of Building Professional Development Partnerships for Adult Educators Project. April 2002

Standards for Professional Development

DRAFT NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS FOR TEACHERS. Teachers Registration Board of South Australia. Submission

NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOLS SUMMATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHER EVALUATION. Summative Evaluation Directions

Standard 1. Foundational Knowledge Candidates have knowledge of the foundations of reading and writing processes and instruction.

Commission on Teacher Credentialing February 2015 Update Douglas M. Gephart ACSA Liaison to CTC

Educator Standards Board Members*

Transition to Formal Schooling. Best Practice Rubric for Early Care Settings (Sending Schools)

2015 TEACHER Program Curriculum Template Guide

Education Specialist Program Design Standards (1-16)

IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

Don Eichhorn Schools: Schools to Watch Pennsylvania and National Middle School Recognition Program

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. Add on Certification Program English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) Endorsement

Tulsa Public Schools District Secondary School Counseling Program

Student Teaching Expectations Undergraduate Early Childhood Education/Early Childhood Special Education Program SPCED-UE 1503 Fall Semester Juniors

PROGRAM FOR LICENSING ASSESSMENTS FOR COLORADO EDUCATORS (PLACE )

From Research to Policy to Practice within the Context of California s Learning to Teach Continuum

Understanding the Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP)

DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING COLLEGE OF BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION POLICY ON REAPPOINTMENT, TENURE, AND PROMOTION (RTP)

Transcription:

Profile of California s Teaching Standards This profile of California s teaching standards supplements the report, Updated multistate review of professional teaching standards, published by the Regional Educational Laboratory West (REL West) in 2010. Earlier supplementary material, which reviewed California s previous teaching standards as well as standards from Florida, Illinois, North Carolina, Ohio, and Texas, can be accessed at WestEd s website (www.wested.org/cs/we/view/rs/959). CALIFORNIA Title of teaching standards: California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) (2009) Page length: 18 Available at www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/standards/cstp-2009.pdf Teaching standards 1. Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning 2. Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning 3. Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning 4. Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students 5. Assessing Students for Learning 6. Developing as a Professional Educator The California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP) were revised in 2009 to respond to changes in the context for teaching and learning in California over the past decade and to address the pressing needs of an increasingly diverse P 12 student body (p. 3). Leaders of the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing and the California Department of Education convened a statewide advisory panel to review the 1997 version of the CSTP and propose appropriate updates. The panel consisted of applicants from the teaching profession as well as key stakeholder group appointees with expertise in teacher preparation and/or effective teaching. Teaching standards target audience The CSTP apply to all teachers, with the preamble stating that the teaching standards are intended to provide a common language and a vision of the scope and complexity of the profession by which all teachers can define and develop their practice. The standards seek to serve and support professional educators in fulfilling their professional roles and responsibilities from preservice teacher to experienced practitioner (p. 1). Structure of the teaching standards The 18-page CSTP document begins with an introductory section that articulates a holistic and developmental vision of teaching, describes the context of teaching in California, and outlines the organizational structure of the teaching standards. Page 1

According to the CSTP, each teaching standard is introduced in a narrative description that portrays an accomplished level of professional teaching. Following the narrative description, each standard is organized into a set of big ideas or elements that identify key areas within that particular domain of teaching. Each element is further illustrated with reflective questions that encourage teachers to explore aspects of teaching practice throughout their careers. In order to foster ongoing reflection and insights into teaching, the questions are introduced with the stems, How do I... and Why do I... and are meant to encourage teachers to examine the rationale... for central aspects of their teaching (p. 4). Teaching standards approach to addressing the needs of special populations English learner (EL) students Recognizing or supporting diversity... support all students to use first and second language skills to achieve learning goals? (Standard 1: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning, Key Element 1.2, Question 3, p. 5). Differentiating instruction... address the English Language Development (ELD) standards as they relate to my English learners levels of language acquisition? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.6, Question 1, p. 11). 1... ensure access to the critical concepts and themes in the academic content standards and state curriculum frameworks for students at various levels of English proficiency and for students with special needs? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.6, Question 4, p. 11). 2... use knowledge of my English learners levels of language proficiency to plan instruction that supports their subject matter learning and academic language development? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.1, Question 5, p. 12).... determine learning goals that address all students language abilities and diverse learning needs? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.2, Question 3, p. 12).... address the ELD standards appropriately, based on my English learners levels of language acquisition? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.4, Question 6, p. 13). 3... strengthen existing plans for students at identified levels of English proficiency? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.5, Question 3, p. 13).... address the specific needs of English learners and students with special needs as I use assessments to inform my instruction? (Standard 5: Assessing Students for Learning, Key Element 5.4, Question 7, p. 14). 4 1 This standard was referenced in both the Accountability and English Learner topic areas because it refers to both ELD standards (Acct) and language 2 This standard was referenced in the Accountability, English Learner, and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to academic content standards (Acct), English proficiency (EL), and 3 This standard was referenced in both the Accountability and English Learner topic areas because it refers to both ELD standards (Acct) and language 4 This standard was referenced in both the English Learner and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to both English learners (EL) and Page 2

Selecting materials or curricula... select materials, resources, and technologies to support subject matter instruction of my English learners and students with special needs? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.6, Question 3, p. 11). 5... select materials, resources, and technologies to support the learning needs of English learners and students with special needs? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.4, Question 8, p. 13). 6 Assessing students language status and development... monitor the learning of students with limited English proficiency or of students with special needs? (Standard 1: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning, Key Element 1.6, Question 3, p. 6). 7... build understanding of my English learners levels of language acquisition in order to know how to best support their learning? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.2, Question 4, p. 10).... use assessment results to plan instruction to support English learners? (Standard 5: Assessing Students for Learning, Key Element 5.3, Question 5, p. 14). Students with disabilities Assessing students with disabilities... monitor the learning of students with limited English proficiency or of students with special needs? (Standard 1: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning, Key Element 1.6, Question 3, p. 6). 8... build understanding of my students with special needs in order to know how and when to differentiate instruction? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.2, Question 5, p. 10). Differentiating instruction... adapt routines, procedures, and norms to ensure the success of students with special needs? (Standard 2: Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning, Key Element 2.6, Question 6, p. 8).... address the Individual Education Plan (IEP) goals and objectives of my students with special needs? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.6, Question 2, p. 11). 5 This standard was referenced in the Education Technology, English Learner, and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to technologies 6 This standard was referenced in the Education Technology, English Learner, and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to technologies 7 This standard was referenced in both the English Learner and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to both English learners (EL) and 8 This standard was referenced in both the English Learner and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to both English learners (EL) and Page 3

... select materials, resources, and technologies to support subject matter instruction of my English learners and students with special needs? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.6, Question 3, p. 11). 9... ensure access to the critical concepts and themes in the academic content standards and state curriculum frameworks for students at various levels of English proficiency and for students with special needs? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.6, Question 4, p. 11). 10... address the IEP goals and objectives of my students with special needs? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.4, Question 7, p. 13).... select materials, resources, and technologies to support the learning needs of English learners and students with special needs? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.4, Question 8, p. 13). 11... strengthen existing plans for students with special needs? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.5, Question 4, p. 13).... address the specific needs of English learners and students with special needs as I use assessments to inform my instruction? (Standard 5: Assessing Students for Learning, Key Element 5.4, Question 7, p. 14). 12 Using education technology Identifying technology and evaluating its instructional value... know the full range of materials, resources, and technologies provided by the school or district? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.5, Question 1, p. 11).... select materials, resources, and technologies to support differentiated student learning of the subject matter? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.5, Question 2, p. 11).... select materials, resources, and technologies to support subject matter instruction of my English learners and students with special needs? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.6, Question 3, p. 11). 13... select materials, resources, and technologies to support the learning needs of English learners and students with special needs? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.4, Question 8, p. 13). 14 9 This standard was referenced in the Education Technology, English Learner, and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to technologies 10 This standard was referenced in the Accountability, English Learner, and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to academic content standards (Acct), English proficiency (EL), and 11 This standard was referenced in the Education Technology, English Learner, and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to technologies 12 This standard was referenced in both the English Learner and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to both English learners (EL) and 13 This standard was referenced in the Education Technology, English Learner, and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to technologies 14 This standard was referenced in the Education Technology, English Learner, and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to technologies Page 4

... become familiar with and select technology resources that support assessment practices? (Standard 5: Assessing Students for Learning, Key Element 5.6, Question 1, p. 15). Effectively integrating technology into instruction... utilize multiple types of technology to facilitate learning? (Standard 1: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning, Key Element 1.4, Question 6, p. 5).... help students to develop and use strategies and technologies for accessing knowledge and information? (Standard 1: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning, Key Element 1.5, Question 8, p. 6).... provide students access to resources, technologies, and comfortable workspaces? (Standard 2: Creating and Maintaining Effective Environments for Student Learning, Key Element 2.2, Question 4, p. 7).... use technologies to convey key concepts in the subject matter? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.5, Question 4, p. 11). Using technology to assess students... use technology to analyze student learning and inform instruction? (Standard 5: Assessing Students for Learning, Key Element 5.6, Question 2, p. 15). Demonstrating competency with and interest in technology... expand my knowledge and effective application of new instructional methods and technologies? (Standard 6: Developing as a Professional Educator, Key Element 6.2, Question 7, p. 16). Collaborating and communicating on the use of technological tools... use appropriate technology resources to communicate students learning to students and their families? (Standard 5: Assessing Students for Learning, Key Element 5.6, Question 3, p. 15). Using assistive technology for students... adapt materials and resources, make accommodations, and use appropriate assistive equipment and other technologies to support students diverse learning needs? (Standard 1: Engaging and Supporting All Students in Learning, Key Element 1.4, Question 5, p. 5). Considering accountability and student learning standards Knowing and understanding standards... identify, understand, and teach the key concepts and underlying themes and relationships in the academic content standards and state curriculum frameworks? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.1, Question 3, p. 10).... maintain and utilize current understanding of relevant content standards and frameworks? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.1, Question 6, p. 10). Page 5

... contribute to school and student success by being knowledgeable of learning goals, standards, and objectives established by relevant national, state, and local organizations and stakeholders? (Standard 6: Developing as a Professional Educator, Key Element 6.7, Question 2, p. 17). Using standards to plan instruction... plan lessons and units that promote access to academic content standards for all students? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.1, Question 4, p. 12).... establish long-term and short-term goals that are based on academic content standards and reflect students strengths, interests, and needs? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.2, Question 2, p. 12). Delivering standards-based instruction... identify, understand, and teach the key concepts and underlying themes and relationships in the academic content standards and state curriculum frameworks? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.1, Question 3, p. 10). 15... utilize standards-aligned and/or adopted curriculum in ways that support student learning? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.3, Question 5, p. 10).... address the English Language Development (ELD) standards as they relate to my English learners levels of language acquisition? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.6, Question 1, p. 11). 16... ensure access to the critical concepts and themes in the academic content standards and state curriculum frameworks for students at various levels of English proficiency and for students with special needs? (Standard 3: Understanding and Organizing Subject Matter for Student Learning, Key Element 3.6, Question 4, p. 11). 17... address the ELD standards appropriately, based on my English learners levels of language acquisition? (Standard 4: Planning Instruction and Designing Learning Experiences for All Students, Key Element 4.4, Question 6, p. 13). 18 Reference California Commission on Teacher Credentialing and California Department of Education. (2009). California Standards for the Teaching Profession (CSTP). Retrieved January 2010, from www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/standards/cstp-2009.pdf. 15 This standard also appears in the above section: Knowing and understanding standards. 16 This standard was referenced in both the Accountability and English Learner topic areas because it refers to both ELD standards (Acct) and language 17 This standard was referenced in the Accountability, English Learner, and Students with Disabilities topic areas because it refers to academic content standards (Acct), English proficiency (EL), and 18 This standard was referenced in both the Accountability and English Learner topic areas because it refers to both ELD standards (Acct) and language Page 6