Life Cycle Cost Analysis



Similar documents
LCCA Defined (FHWA) LCCA Policy Statement (9/96) LCCA Policy Statement (9/96) Policy Statement Con t... Use of LCCA. CE 4401 Pavement Design

Eric Ross Federal Highway Administration Proposed Office of Performance Management

FINAL Cost Estimate Report

Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA)

Transportation Asset Management

Final Report Evaluation of I-Pave Low Volume Road Design Software

LIFE-CYCLE COST COMPARISON FOR MUNICIPAL ROAD PAVEMENTS

Evaluation of Long-Lasting Perpetual Asphalt Pavement Using Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. Arnar Agustsson Sulton Azamov

Cost Considerations of In-Place Recycling as a Pavement Rehabilitation Alternative Brian Diefenderfer, PhD, PE Alex Apeagyei, PhD, PE

CHAPTER 2 LCCA APPROACHES

Asphaltic Wedge Paving

COST EFFECTIVE ROAD MAINTENANCE MARCH 2015

Guide for Homebuyers

Report No. CDOT Final Report LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS AND DISCOUNT RATE ON PAVEMENTS FOR THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Florida s Experience with Crumb Rubber

USE OF HIGHLY POLYMER MODIFIED HMA (HiMA) Ohio Asphalt Paving Conference Columbus, Ohio February 4, 2015 Bob Kluttz, Kraton Polymers

LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL

American Public Works Association Asset Management Task Force, 1998

700 Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design

Nevada DOT Cold In-Place Recycling Federal Highway Administration National Review Close out meeting, August 25, 2005

How To Design A Crash Investigation Site

CHAPTER 2 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Pavement Patching Repair for AC and PCC Pavement Surfaces. Vern Thompson

Summary of FHWA In-Place Recycling Activities

Texas Freight Advisory Committee A PRIMER ON PUBLIC SECTOR FREIGHT PERFORMANCE MEASURES

AirCost LCCA Software An overview of AAPTP Paul M. Dalbey, P.E.

Paving Capitalization Work Categories and Treatments

Electric Plug-In Versus Electric Hybrid Comparison Google Fleet Study

MDOT Construction Field Services Update MDOT LAP/Consultant Construction Kickoff Meetings

High-Speed Nondestructive Testing and Intelligent Construction Systems

DRAFT ENRICHMENT DESIGN MANUAL. Pavements Engineering No M. R D Leach SENIOR RESEARCH OFFICER. MAIN ROADS Western Australia R: M

NOTES TO THE PERFORMANCE BASED SPECIFICATION FOR HOTMIX ASPHALT WEARING COURSE SURFACING

AASHTO Subcomittee on Materials Biloxi, Mississippi August 4-10, 2012 Chris Abadie, P.E.

YOUR PIPE RENEWAL CIP, PART 2: THE SANDS OF TIME

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM (QAP) City Rohnert Park

Having cash on hand is costly since you either have to raise money initially (for example, by borrowing from a bank) or, if you retain cash out of

A Case for Reducing and Laydown Temp

Wisconsin Highway Research Program

Rent to Own Housing. What is a Rent to Own Housing contract?

RECYCLED ASPHALT SHINGLES IN ROAD APPLICATIONS An Overview of the State of Practice

Asphalt-Rubber Chip Seal (SAM and SAMI) applications have been Main Stream since 1985! By: Jeff Smith

Rehabilitation Strategies for Bonded Concrete Overlays of Asphalt Pavements

asphalt applications Construction and surfacing of footways and cycleways using asphalt mpa asphalt Asphalt Information Service

Earth Retaining Structures

Maryland Work Zone Accidents Comparison May 2005

LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS PROCEDURES MANUAL

Benefits of Preventative Maintenance Pavement Sealers

KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET POLICY FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PAVEMENT REHABILITATION AND PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS

NORTH STAR MUTUAL. Minnesota Agent Bulletin

Improving Rehabilitation Selection for Pavement Life Cycle Cost Analysis

IT & Small Businesses. It can help grow your small business and cut cost where you never thought possible.

SPECIAL NOTE FOR ASPHALT WATERPROOFING MIX FOR BRIDGE-DECK OVERLAYS AND ADJACENT APPROACHES

Investment Appraisal INTRODUCTION

Recycling with CRM. John D Angelo D Angelo Consulting, LLC Phone johndangelo@dangeloconsultingllc.com

Public Works and Transportation Bus Service Hub Terminal HVAC, Canopy, AVL Sign Equipment

Rutting Based Evaluation of Asphalt Mixes

Homework 5: The Monetary System and Inflation

research report Investigation of Proposed AASHTO Rut Test Procedure Using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer Virginia Transportation Research Council

Thin Whitetopping Application at Williamsburg Regional Airport and Other Thin Whitetopping Airport Applications.

Whole of life cycle cost analysis in bridge rehabilitation

Ohio Department of Transportation. Division of Construction Management

Solving a Hard Problem For The NYC DOT With a High Performance Thin Overlay

Choice of Discount Rate

738-B-297 POLYMERIC CONCRETE BRIDGE DECK OVERLAY. (Adopted )

MHD BRIDGE SECTION WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNIT PRICES GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF THE WEIGHTED AVERAGE UNIT PRICE TABULATION SHEETS

The Roads to Recovery. Facts About Transportation Funding and Spending

Invitation to Bid. Asphalt Restoration and Spot Repairs. For. Hardin County Water District No. 1

NorthEast Transportation Training and Certification Program (NETTCP) Course Registration Form

CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION BY THE NUMBERS:

Company Pension Plans in Canada

C. Section TESTING LABORATORY SERVICE.

AGREGADOS RECICLADOS MITOS Y REALIDADES

Transcription:

Ronald Collins Pavement Technology a Division of Astec, Inc.

LCCA is an analysis technique that builds on the well founded principles of economic analysis to evaluate the over-the-long-term economic efficiency between competing alternative investment options - FHWA LCCA Technical Bulletin FHWA-SA-98-079

Benefits of more expensive mixes may not readily be seen Must look at the mix in the long run, not just the up front dollar figure Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) can help look at the long run LCCA is probably one of the most underutilized tools in our industry

For example, SMA is normally a higher priced mix than standard mixes In some cases, if it lasts just slightly longer than the conventional mix, it will be worth it

Mix Costs in Wisconsin Mix Type Average Bid Cost SMA 47.00 HV Mix 38.00 Compare placing 2,000 tons of the HV Mix for resurfacing Vs. 2,000 tons of the SMA Total Cost of the HV Mix = $76,000 Total Cost of the SMA Mix = $94,000 Assume a discount rate of 3%

If the HV Mix lasts 10 years, it has cost equivalent to $8,910 per year If the SMA Mix lasts 13 years, it has a cost equivalent to $8,838 per year SMA only needs to last a little less than 3 more years to be worth the extra money

Users costs can make an even bigger difference Comprised of vehicle operating costs, user delay, crash costs Imagine the cost of delaying 30,000 vehicles per day for 20 minutes User costs depend on many things, but can cost as much as the construction itself! Typically, users costs are the same for different alternatives

Mix Costs in Wisconsin with Users Costs Mix Type Average Bid Cost SMA 47.00 HV Mix 38.00 Compare placing 2,000 tons of the HV Mix for resurfacing Vs. 2,000 tons of the SMA Assume Users Cost of $75,000 for construction Total Cost of the HV Mix = $76,000 + $75,000 = $151,000 Total Cost of the SMA Mix = $94,000 + $75,000 = $169,000 Assume a discount rate of 3%

with users costs taken into account If the HV Mix lasts 10 years, it has cost equivalent to $17,702 per year If the SMA Mix lasts 11.5 years, it will have an equivalent annual cost SMA only needs to last about 1.5 more years to be worth the extra money

LCCA can also be beneficial in analyzing the performance of your mixes Must ask the question: If we can make a mix that will last longer, what will it be worth to us Life cycle cost analysis as well as performance analysis can help

Several states have begun performance testing all mix designs before placement Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) is one tool that can be used

100 lb Rubber Hose Inflated to 100 psi HMA Specimen Mixes designs can be tested before being placed on the road Poor performers are identified ahead of time rejected or redesigned to perform better

Performance testing, such as the APA, can be used to ensure that mixes will meet the required life span Mixes can be reformulated to be better performers and last longer LCCA shows that if a mix lasts a little longer, it can mean great savings Also shows that if it doesn t last long enough, can mean a loss in money

Example: Use Wisconsin HV Mix at $38 per ton Will Place 2000 tons for a total of $76,000 What will the equivalent yearly cost of the mix be if it lasts 10 years? if it lasts 11 years? if it lasts 12 years? -OR- If it only lasts 7 or 8 years?

Number of Years Annualized Cost % Difference from 10 Year Cost 7 $12,198 37% 8 $10,827 22% 9 $9,761 10% 10 $8,910 0% 10.5 $8,545-4% 11 $8,214-8% 12 $7,635-14% 13 $7,146-20% 14 $6,728-24% 15 $6,366-29%

What is it worth to the an agency and the contracting industry to make a mix last 11 years instead of 10? 8% reduction in cost money that can be used somewhere else more paving Performance testing your mixes prior to construction will pay off in the long run.

Assume your state places 3,000,000 tons of HMA per year at an average mix price of $30/ton ($90,000,000). If you can increase the life of all mixes, what is it worth. Added Years % Decrease in Annual Cost Total Dollars Saved 0.5 4% $3,600,000 1 8% $7,200,000 2 14% $12,600,000 3 20% $18,000,000 4 24% $21,600,000 5 29% $26,100,000

Yearly budget of $90,000,000 for HMA Adding 1 year of life will decrease costs by 8% Savings of $7,200,000 per year After 11 years, you will have saved $92,216,129 equal to one year s budget!

Assume your state places 5,000,000 tons of HMA per year at an average mix price of $30/ton ($150,000,000). If you can increase the life of your pavements, what is it worth. Added Years % Decrease in Annual Cost Total Dollars Saved 0.5 4% $6,000,000 1 8% $12,000,000 2 14% $21,000,000 3 20% $30,000,000 4 24% $36,000,000 5 29% $43,500,000

Yearly budget of $150,000,000 for HMA Adding 1 year of life will decrease costs by 8% Savings of $12,000,000 per year After 11 years, you will have saved $153,693,548 equal to one year s budget!

Will improving the mixes make them more expensive? Not necessarily May just mean changing mix proportions

Conventional Mix $/ton Percentage Total Cost #78 Stone $13.35 40.00% $5.34 Sand $9.60 30.00% $2.88 Screenings $9.00 30.00% $2.70 Binder $175.00 6.00% $10.50 $21.42 Improved Mix $/ton Percentage Total Cost #78 Stone $13.35 70.00% $9.35 Sand $9.60 20.00% $1.92 Screenings $9.00 10.00% $0.90 Binder $175.00 5.50% $9.63 $21.79

Significant changes to mixes may take longer to realize a savings polymers fibers Georgia DOT performed LCCA in the early days of SMA to decide if it was worth the extra cost

SMA Annualized Costs are 37% lower than Conventional Mix Annualized Cost per Mile SMA Conventional $50,095 $79,532

What is the potential payback for placing a mix that lasts longer? Cheaper mix in the long run Less disturbance for the travelling public due to resurfacing - difficult cost to calculate Safer roads due to better performance More money for other paving projects

What is the cost of early failure? Road requires repair earlier Must spend budgeted money on unbudgeted items More roads deteriorate due to lack of funds Increases user expenses