Risk Analysis, GIS and Arc Schematics: California Delta Levees



Similar documents
San Francisco Bay Margin Conservation Decision Support System (DSS)

Building Resilient Infrastructure for the 21 st Century

Background Information: The Mamquam River Floodplain Restoration Project

Earth Science. River Systems and Landforms GEOGRAPHY The Hydrologic Cycle. Introduction. Running Water. Chapter 14.

GIS MAPPING FOR IRRIGATION DISTRICT RAPID APPRAISALS Daniel J. Howes 1, Charles M. Burt 2, Stuart W. Styles 3 ABSTRACT

The North State: Implementing the California Water Action Plan February 24, 2014

AN INITIATIVE TO IMPROVE

4.2 Buena Vista Creek Watershed

UTILITIZATION OF ECOHYDROLOGIC MODELS IN FLOODPLAIN FISH PASSAGE AND HABITAT RESTORATION EVALUATION

A HYDROLOGIC NETWORK SUPPORTING SPATIALLY REFERENCED REGRESSION MODELING IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

Subsidence Mitigation Through Rice Cultivation Research Project Goals:

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION. Lower Carmel River Floodplain Restoration and Enhancement Project

GLOSSARY OF TERMS CHAPTER 11 WORD DEFINITION SOURCE. Leopold

RESTORATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAGOONS

Development of an Impervious-Surface Database for the Little Blackwater River Watershed, Dorchester County, Maryland

Using the Carbon Market to Provide Financial Support for Coastal Restoration and Protection. fact SHEET

Technical Study and GIS Model for Migratory Deer Range Habitat. Butte County, California

ART Vulnerability and Risk Assessment Report September 2012 Appendix C. ART GIS Exposure Analysis

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION. Background

Appendix J Online Questionnaire


Restoring Ecosystems. Ecosystem Restoration Services

EFFECTS OF ARUNDO DONAX ON RIVER HYDRAULICS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHOLOGY, SANTA MARGARITA RIVER, CALIFORNIA

Resolving complex issues with large scale river restoration; a case study: the San Joaquin River in California

ROSE CREEK WATERSHED HYDROLOGIC, HYDRAULIC, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT, AND GEOMORPHIC ANALYSES TASK 1 EXISTING DATA AND INFORMATION SUMMARY REPORT BACKGROUND

Climate Change. Lauma M. Jurkevics - DWR, Southern Region Senior Environmental Scientist

Lower Raritan Watershed Management Area Stormwater & Flooding Subcommittee Strategy Worksheet LRSW-S3C1

How To Improve Water Resources Information And Analysis For Integrated Water Management

CITY UTILITIES DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2010 SCORING GUIDELINES

WONDERFUL, WATERFUL WETLANDS

Greater Los Angeles County Region

Water Resource Issues in the 110 th Congress

Natural Resource-Based Planning*

ArcGIS Data Models Practical Templates for Implementing GIS Projects

Post-Flood Assessment

Protecting Floodplain. While Reducing Flood Losses

San Francisco District. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

FLOOD FORECASTING PRACTICE IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Assessing Rivers for Restoration Purposes. Ann L. Riley Waterways Restoration Institute


Travel Time. Computation of travel time and time of concentration. Factors affecting time of concentration. Surface roughness

Flood Risk Management

Flood Risk Management

The Planning Process. 1 O WOW 1.0 Plan Moving Towards Sustainability

Building Caribbean GeoNode Platform in Support of Climate Risk Management Jacob Opadeyi, PhD

Chapter 9. Selected Watershed Initiatives in the Great Basin Region

Chapter 6: Mitigation Strategies

Charles A. Young, Ph.D.

Remaining Wetland Acreage 1,500, , ,040-39%

5.0 OVERVIEW OF FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION MEASURES

Bill Swanson MWH Water Resources Practice Leader

A GIS helps you answer questions and solve problems by looking at your data in a way that is quickly understood and easily shared.

Comprehensive Recommendations Supporting the Use of the Multiple Lines of Defense Strategy to Sustain Coastal Louisiana 2008 Report (Version I)

San Francisco Bay Area Wetlands Restoration Program Design Review Group. Project Summary Outline

An Initial Assessment of the Impacts of Sea Level Rise to the California Coast

Why Demographic Data are not Up to the Challenge of Measuring Climate Risks, and What to do about it. CIESIN Columbia University

The Teton Creek Restoration Project Summary:

Alternative (Flexible) Mitigation Options Proposed Rule - Revised

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources \mn_dnr \mn_dnr\spatial \mn_dnr\tabular \mn_dnr\metadata

March Prepared by: Irvine Ranch Water District Sand Canyon Avenue. Irvine, CA Contact: Natalie Likens (949)

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Remote Sensing, GPS and GIS Technique to Produce a Bathymetric Map

Issues from the Phase II Report

1. Launch ArcCatalog, then navigate to the following location using the directory tree on the left side of the screen:

A. Flood Management in Nevada

Reference: CA Urban Streams Partnership s White Paper on Funding Urban Watershed Projects Recommendations for a 2014 Water Bond

WATER QUALITY, SUPPLY, AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT ACT OF Funding Summary

Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy

Project Title: Project PI(s) (who is doing the work; contact Project Coordinator (contact information): information):

PHOTO: Jon Waterman THE COLORADO RIVER DELTA, CIRCA NOW OPEN BOOKLET TO SEE CHANGE

FLOOD PROTECTION AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN. May Prepared by. for the by Earth Economics

Interim Technical Guidelines for the Development of Environmental Management Plans for Underground Infrastructure Revised - July 2013.

Inventory of Water Diversions in Four Geographic Areas in California s Central Valley

The Budget: Effectively Implementing The 2014 Water Bond

The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta of California was once a

Connecting Science and Management for Virginia s Tidal Wetlands. In this issue...

1.7.0 Floodplain Modification Criteria

Environmental Case Study Decatur, Georgia, DeKalb County A Suburban Creek Resists Channelization

IUCN Guidelines to Avoid Impacts of Water Resources Projects on Dams and Other Water Infrastructure

Restoration Planning and Development of a Restoration Bank

Transcription:

Page 1 of 7 Author: David T. Hansen Risk Analysis, GIS and Arc Schematics: California Delta Levees Presented by David T. Hansen at the ESRI User Conference, 2008, San Diego California, August 6, 2008 Abstract The Sacramento - San Joaquin Delta, California is defined by waterways confined by levees. Over 1,000 miles of levees were constructed for wetland conversion to agriculture in the late 1800's. Exposure of the rich organic soils has resulted in substantial land subsidence. There have been over 160 levee failures since 1900. The levee system is at increasing risk of failure from sea level rise or seismic activity. Information about the levees includes failure history, elevation, and material composition. Associated information includes geomorphology, soils and amount of subsidence of the enclosed islands. This can be viewed as a network system. There are individual networks of levees on the islands. Many of the island networks are separated by narrow channels or adjacent to islands of natural wetland and riparian vegetation which lack levees. GIS is used to integrate this information for risk analysis. Arc Schematics provides opportunities to effectively display and convey this information to decision makers. Introduction The California Delta and Suisun Marsh area are major components of San Francisco Bay Estuary. The system carries flows from the watersheds of the Central Valley. This includes the entire western slope of the Sierra Nevada. At the end of 2006, the Governor of the State of California appointed a Blue Ribbon Task Force to study and develop a strategic vision for the Delta. At the end of 2007, this task force issued the vision statement for the Delta. The major recommendation of the task force is The Delta ecosystem and a reliable water supply for California are the primary, co-equal goals for sustainable management of the Delta. The task force is now involved in the development of a strategic plan to implement this vision. GIS has played a role in the deliberation of the Blue Ribbon Task Force and supporting groups in the visioning process. This paper presents some of the information presented to this task force. Water passing through the Delta is a source of water for a majority of the State's population and provides irrigation water for over 1.0 million hectares (2.5 million acres). It is a key component of Federal and State water projects. The Delta and adjacent Suisun Marsh are constrained to one outlet at Carquinez Strait by coastal mountains. Instead of migration of fluvial and tidal sediments seaward to the bay, tidal and fluvial sediments are stratified upstream as sea levels rise and fall (Atwater, 1982). Figure 1 shows the relative extent of tidal wetlands at about 1850 in the left panel. This also shows natural levee deposits along the stream channel for the Sacramento River at about the same time period (Atwater, 1982). Since 1850, these natural levees served as the basis for man-made levees which have been expanded throughout the Delta and portions of Suisun Marsh. There are over 1,600 kilometers (1000 miles) of levees at the present time (URS Corp., 2007). These levees are shown on the right side

Page 2 of 7 of Figure 1 for the Delta area. In the Delta, agriculture developed since 1850 with the construction of levees and drainage of tidal wetlands. Presently over 202,000 hectares (500,000 acres) of Delta lands are in agricultural production. Figure 2 shows major land use (agriculture) within the Delta based on 2007 mapping by the California Department of Water Resources. The complexes of wetland and riparian systems that existed prior to agricultural development exist only in remnants. Suisun Marsh is largely wetland. It and the remnant wetlands in the Delta represent about 10 percent of the existing wetland areas in California. The Delta remnant is now about 3,000 hectares ( 7,500 acres). Much of the remaining wetlands in the Delta are located on undeveloped natural islands in channels and sloughs. Figure 3 shows an area of remaining wetland and riparian vegetation on channel islands. This is based on detailed vegetation species level mapping by the California Department of Fish and Game in about 2006.

Page 3 of 7 Drainage and conversion of the organic peat and muck soils to agricultural production have led to significant subsidence. Some areas of the Delta are over 7.5 meters (25 feet) below current mean sea level. Delta Levee Systems Many of the levees were constructed from local materials on site including peat and muck. Levee failures have occurred not only during severe storm events. Since 1900, there have been 166 recorded levee failures (URS Corp, 2007). Only portions of this levee system near the cities of Stockton, West Sacramento, and Sacramento are considered adequate for flood protection. The Delta is in close proximity to major active faults in Northern California. It is expected that a severe seismic event would lead to catastrophic collapse of many levee systems. Sea level rise expected from climate change is expected to place an increasing amount of stress on an already risky levee system. The levee systems are factors to be considered for both the environment and water supply. Levees define the stream channel network of the Delta. They define the land-water interface of islands and tracts. They restrict flows to remaining wetland habitats that are on the interior of islands. Public investment in habitat development within subsided portions of the Delta islands is discouraged because of the lack of stability in the levee system and the threat of sea level rise. Failure of key levees or a catastrophic collapse threatens the operation of key water supply systems for the state. Information on the Levee Systems A considerable amount of information has been collected on the levee systems. This includes the historic record as well as extensive on-site investigations. Initially, this information was summarized on individual 100 foot levee segments. While information on individual levee segments can identify particular portions of a levee susceptible to failure, failure of any segment allows flooding of that island. It is more useful to examine the levee system as a whole for a particular island or tract. There are over 80 levee systems reported on in this summary. Among other characteristics, it ranks the value of levees on the following: Water export importance

file://\\reepicheep\uc_cd_papers\uc Papers- Unconverted\New Files\_ZIPS\PAPER_16... Page 4 of 7 6/18/2008 Environmental importance Life safety Flood risk Seismic risk A variety of cost estimates for the enhancement of island or tract levee systems A common portrayal of this information and summaries are in spread sheets as shown in figure 4. Reviewing the information in this format can be rather daunting. It also does not provide an easy spatial reference to where these levee systems are located within the Delta. Application of ArcGIS Schematics The Blue Ribbon Task Force and supporting working groups have been comfortable with the use of maps and GIS in their deliberations. With GIS, a complex spread sheet can be incorporated and used with the spatial representation of the levee system. In this case, the information is carried into a file geodatabase. The main data themes were brought into a common feature dataset. The 100 foot levee segments were represented as a line feature class. A point file containing the name for the separate levee systems was generated for ease of selection of a levee system by name. The line representation of the levee systems could then be linked by island and tract name. A geometric network was then developed on the line segments with automatic generation of junctions between the 100 foot segments. A paper presented by the author at the 2007 ESRI User Conference describes the process of setting up Arc Schematics for a similar application on Delta roads. This paper is titled Delta Island Inter-Relationships: Arc Schematics. For this initial application, the standard builder was used with the option of importing and referencing the geometric network from ArcMap layer files. Some initial work must be done before importing the ArcMap layers. A geometric network must be

Page 5 of 7 defined for the feature classes participating in the schematic with ArcCatalog. In ArcMap, the features are symbolized for common display in both the data frame containing the features and the data frames for the generated schematics. The levee system can then be displayed by various ranked values and costs as carried in the spread sheet. As can be seen in the figure, the levee systems are complex and the size of the islands and tracts protected by the system varies considerably. It is difficult to compare the length of one levee system to another. The extension, ArcGIS Schematics, permits display and analysis of both the components of a geometric network and its schematic representation. Simplification of a network into a schematic focuses attention on major network elements. The relative position and configuration of levee systems based on a selection of similarily ranked levee systems or individual systems can be displayed with the schematic. Two sets of selected sets of levee systems are shown in the following figures. Figure 5 shows the set of levees ranked as critical for maintaining water conveyance through the Delta for the water supply systems. Figure 6 shows a set of levees that contain areas which are ranked high for environmental assets.

Page 6 of 7 Both figures display the schematics in their initial geometric positions. This makes it easier to associate the diagram with the levee system configuration displayed in the map. Selections can be easily made between the tables of information on the levee systems. New schematics can be quickly generated as needed by the groups involved in the Delta Vision process. Summary The extension, Arc schematics, is an effective tool for display and evaluation of networks. In this application, the extension was used to simplify the display and analysis of levee systems in the California Delta. Of major interest for this application is the query of ranked values developed for each of the levee systems and display of those systems in a simplified format. The State of California is in the midst of planning process for the Delta (Delta Vision, 2007). This process is examining the risks to the area from climate change, sea level rise, seismic events, urbanization, etc. to the area and services provided by the area. Schematics should be useful in this process. References Atwater, Brian F,; Geologic Maps of the Sacramento San Joaquin Delta, California; USGS Miscellaneous Field Studies; Map MF-1401; 1982; Reston VA. Blue Ribbon Task Force - Delta Vision; State of California, Our Vision for the California Delta, November 30, 2007, California Resources Agency, Sacramento, California; 2006. CaSIL; California Spatial Information Library; http://gis.ca.gov Delta Vision; http://www.deltavision.ca.gov; From the Delta Vision Home page see links to GIS data; 2007. ESRI, ArcGIS Schematics Tutorial, ArcGIS 9.2, 2006, ESRI, Redlands, California; 2006.

Page 7 of 7 ESRI, ArcGIS Schematics Tutorial II: Working with the Custom Query Based Builder, ArcGIS 9, 2006, ESRI, Redlands, California; 2006. Hansen, David T.; Delta Island Inter-Relationships: ArcGIS Schematics, June 20, 2007, ESRI 2007 User Conference, San Diego, California; 2006. URS Corporation for California Department of Water Resources; 2007, ;Status and Trends of Delta Suisun Services"; URS Corporation; March, 2007. Authors: David T. Hansen GIS Specialist / Soil Scientist MPGIS Phone: (916) 978-5268 FAX: (916) 978-5290 Email: dhansen@mp.usbr.gov