USEPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study Water Management Workshop

Similar documents
Water and Unconventional Natural Gas Production Regulatory / Policy Consideration and Initiatives

Innovative Removal of Agricultural Related Water Pollutants in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Calculating Molar Mass of a Compound

Study Assesses Shale Decline Rates

Christopher Harto Argonne National Laboratory

AGL UPSTREAM INVESTMENTS PTY LTD

Marcellus Fast Facts

The ground water region in the area of the proposed Project site is made-up of sedimentary rocks (Figure 5.6-1)

Penn State Cooperative Extension

Plan Groundwater Procurement, Implementation and Costs, prepared for the Brazos River Authority, July 2005.

APPENDIX B. Magna Reservoir Leak Detection & Water Quality Sampling Plan (Revised June 2011)

Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation

Reclamation of Marcellus Shale Drilling Sites in West Virginia by Jeff Skousen and Paul Ziemkiewicz West Virginia University

MAC-ENC-PRO-062 GROUNDWATER MONITORING PROGRAM

Life After Getting a BS and MS Degree Working as a Professional in PA

AQUIFER STORAGE RECOVERY

Understanding Hydraulic Fracturing

Produced water from oil and gas production

FRACTURING FLOWBACK: CONTROLS, ANALYSIS & BENEFITS

Rule 318A.f: Rule Description

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Recommended Practices Associated with Hydraulic Fracturing Operations

Zero Discharge Water Management for. Horizontal Shale Gas Well Development

EPRI Global Climate Change Research Seminar. Natural Gas Supply. Francis O Sullivan, Ph.D. May 25 th, 2011

VII Seminario Estratégico - SPE Evaluación de las Perspectivas Energéticas de la Argentina

Focus on Geopolitics N.A. Shale & Export Options - A Canadian View

Natural Gas Supply/Demand - Challenges and Opportunities

The Role of Groundwater in Alberta s Tight Water Supply Environment. Ken Baxter, M.Sc., P.Geol. Dan R. Brown, M.Sc., P.Geol.

Multilevel Monitoring and Characterization of the Edwards and Trinity Aquifers of Central Texas

Sunday Times review of DEP drilling records reveals water damage, murky testing methods

Chapter 1 Introduction

Shale Gas Production Decline Trend Comparison Over Time and Basins Jason Baihly, Raphael Altman, Raj Malpani, and Fang Luo, Schlumberger

How To Manage Water Resources In The Yakima Basin

CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY ---- Phase I. Technical Appendix O. Municipal TDS Research

Nutrient Reduction by Use of Industrial Deep Injection Wells, Miami-Dade County, Florida

MOLES AND MOLE CALCULATIONS

Shale Energy Fluids Management Practices

On the Impact of Oil Extraction in North Orange County: Overview of Hydraulic Fracturing

Oil and Gas Extraction and Source Water Protection

James City Service Authority Five Forks Water Treatment Facility

The Future of Energy in Louisiana! March 2014

A History and Overview of the Barnett Shale

Questions from Water Celebration Day

Standard methods in water analysis

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY ACCREDITATION PROGRAM Accredited Fields of Testing

Plan to Study the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources

South Dakota s Statewide Ground Water Quality Monitoring Network

TREATMENT OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZER PLANT WASTE WATER IN FLORIDA FOR DISCHARGE AND RE USE PURPOSES

Total Suspended Solids Total Dissolved Solids Hardness

Moles, Molecules, and Grams Worksheet Answer Key

State of Utah Natural Resource Damage Trustee Southwest Jordan Valley Groundwater Cleanup. Report to the Public June 2004

PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO R-28 RESOLUTION NO.

Shale Gas: Energy and Environmental Issues

KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA WATER YEAR 2002 WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT

Drilling for Natural Gas in the Marcellus Shale: What to Expect, How to Mediate using FracTracker

Tuesday, March 17, 2015 Houston, TX. Energy Exchange 9:20 9:50 a.m. and 9:55 10:25 a.m. OIL AND GAS: ENVIRONMENTAL INSURANCE IS IT NECESSARY?

Expanded Monitoring Program

Drill-Right. best Oil & Gas Development Practices for Texas

What we ve learned from over 20 years of voluntary private well water testing

Removing Thallium from Industrial FGD Scrubber Water with Sorbster Adsorbent Media

Elin Betanzo WRRM Annual Meeting April 6, 2016

Stacey Harrington, M.S, R.E.H.S. Napa County Environmental Management Coordinator

CITY OF POMPANO BEACH Broward County, Florida

Water Quality and Water Usage Surveys

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

Roosevelt Water Conservation District ROOSEVELT WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT

Exploration for natural gas

NAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

The Impact of Marcellus Gas Drilling on Rural Drinking Water Supplies

A SEISMIC OIL AND GAS PRIMER by Kevin B. Hill

Up Stream Oil and Gas Contingency

IMPACT OF SHALE TECHNOLOGY ON HOUSTON REAL ESTATE

Unconventional Oil and Gas Production Drives Trends in Water Management and Treatment

Natural Gas Drilling and the Impact on Our Public Health

TEXAS: SAN ANTONIO San Antonio Protects Edwards Aquifer

The New Era of Shale. BHP Billiton Petroleum

Monterey Shale Potential

Characterizing Beauty Salon Wastewater for the Purpose of Regulating Onsite Disposal Systems

The Shale Gale Also Brings a Data Blizzard Author:

RESTRICTING GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS TO PROTECT WATER RESOURCES: ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Lesson 5: Water Conductivity and Total Dissolved Solids Water Quality Sampling

USAEE Meeting. Houston, TX. Presented by: George Lippman President of Lippman Consulting, Inc. (915)

Extr acting the Facts:

Building Resilient Infrastructure for the 21 st Century

Stormwater Quality Monitoring Report

Pre-Treatment Water Quality in the Aaron Run Watershed

CERTIFICATE Total E&P Denmark B.V. Nyhavn 43, København K.

The Dungeness Water Exchange Mitigation Guidance Document. April 2013

January 2014: Jeanne Briskin of the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

SANTA FE COUNTY'S OIL DEVELOPMENT ZONING ORDINANCE

New Yo r k Marc e l l us and Utica Shales. 130,000 net acres Oil, natural gas liquids, and dry gas Access to major pipelines

Impact of utilised bottom ash

HiWAY: The Quest For Infinite Conductivity Innovation for a step-change in Hydraulic Fracturing

BASIN MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES CHEROKEE SUBINVENTORY UNIT

Naming Compounds Handout Key

Ground Water Level Monitoring Survey Results

Innovative Water Technologies Programs. 5 th Annual Summer Seminar 2015 San Antonio Water Systems July 24, 2015 By Erika Mancha

Leveraging logistics:

The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA

Transcription:

USEPA Hydraulic Fracturing Study Water Management Workshop March 29, 2011 How are Appropriate Water Sources for Hydraulic Fracturing Determined? Pre-development Conditions and Management of Development Phase Water Usage Red River Watershed Management Institute - LSU Shreveport Gary Hanson, Director Amanda Lewis, Assistant to Director

Woodford Shale Fayetteville Shale Marcellus Shale Barnett Shale Eagle Ford Shale Haynesville Shale Haynesville Shale AAPG, 2007 LSUS Red River Watershed Management Institute

Appropriate water sources of hydraulic fracturing (fracing) in shale gas plays Groundwater (potable) Groundwater (non-potable) Surface water Treated wastewater Produced brackish or saltwater No water - LPG

LSUS Red River Watershed Management Institute Red River Education & Research Park Red River LSU Shreveport Anderson Watershed Research Station A Partnership between the City of Shreveport and LSU Shreveport LSU Shreveport and Red River Education & Research Park

Evolving Community-based Nature Education & Research Park Model (Red River Education & Research Park) A River Red River A City Shreveport A University LSUS An Education & Research Park The Institute and the Park have been developed as flexible institutions, from the start, solving realworld problems by constantly adapting An adaptive model - Based on "Sense of Place" institution building

Red River Education & Research Park Using a suite of borehole logs to evaluate Red River Alluvial Aquifer & Carrizo-Wilcox Aquifer Not scared of dirt, willing to work LSUS students using Geoprobe to develop monitoring well in Red River Alluvial Aquifer

Institute Model A Watershed Approach Community Local, State & Federal Agencies LSUS Red River Watershed Management Institute University A NEUTRAL ENTITY

Water Availability CADDO PARISH COMMITTEE EVOLVED INTO A REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES COMMITTEE OF NW LOUISIANA

Water Resources Committee of Northwest Louisiana Watershed Based - Volunteer Committee A Self-organizing Institution formed to protect water quality & quantity The Committee was formed by the Caddo Parish President, a concerned citizen & Director of the RRWMI. As WRCNL evolved, more issues arose, & it became more flexible & adapted to solve new challenges.

Wilcox Aquifer Potentiometric Surface

Wilcox Aquifer Recharge Potential Red River Alluvial

Water Energy Working Group Meeting at LSU Shreveport WG became more flexible & adapted to issues before or as they arose Participants: US Army Corps of Engineers Vicksburg (USACE) Red River Waterway Commission, LAF&WS, LADEQ Red River Watershed Management Institute (LSUS) Red River Valley Assoc., Sabine River Authority, Caddo Levee District, Bossier Levee District, La DOTD, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Chesapeake, Questar, EnCana, Petrohawk, Camterra, JW, Exco, Shell, El Paso, Titanium Env., Louisiana Oil & Gas Assoc., Red River Pump, Impact Energy Services, Water Resources Committee of Northwest Louisiana, and International Paper Company, Mansfield Early on & on a voluntary basis, most Haynesville operators reduced their use of groundwater Co-chairs: Directors of Red River Watershed Management Institute & Red River Waterway Commission

CLOSE COORDINATION BETWEEN WATER ENERGY WORKING GROUP & OFFICE OF CONSERVATION HAS BEEN CRITICAL FOR SUCCESS LSUS RRWMI

Caddo Parish/LSUS GW Monitoring South Camp Water Level (ft) 258 256 254 252 250 Summer Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn. Benjamin Franklin J A S O D J F M A M J J A S N J F A M J 2008 Winter-Spring Month Summer 2010 Water level appeared to be dropping rapidly in this area of heavy drilling & hydraulic fracturing Lewis and Hanson, 2010

Caddo Ph/LSUS Wilcox Monitoring Well Project 2008 2011

Caddo Ph/LSUS Wilcox Monitoring Well Project 2008 2011

The Times (Shreveport) - This article is a good example of how the press can inform and educate the public 25-125 GPM 1400 GPM Vickie Welborn, 2009

Solutions - Alternative surface water frac sources EXCO has built a 9 mile pipeline in order to use treated wastewater from International Paper Co. at Mansfield, La. 12 million gallons/day The Times, 2010

Solutions - Alternative surface water frac sources EXCO s 9-mile wastewater pipeline IPCO

Baseline Water Quality Study of Aquifers in Bossier, Caddo & De Soto Parishes LSU & LSU Shreveport working together. Up to 1000 domestic wells will be sampled & analyzed Louisiana Geological Survey Hydrologist/Geologist Doug Carlson (right) & Marty Horn (middle) and Gary Hanson (left), LSU Shreveport

Frac Water Use Haynesville Shale Source Louisiana Department of Natural Resources (2010) After D. Carlson et al, 2011

Has Wilcox Aquifer Water Quality Changed in the Past Three Years in Response to Haynesville Hydraulic Fracturing Activity? Douglas Carlson & Marty Horn Louisiana Geological Survey & Thomas Van Biersel Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Location of this study s first 450 wells

Location of Caddo Parish wells previously sampled Location of current match set of wells ~75 D. Carlson et al, 2011

June 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011 This study will create a base data set of water quality that will include 950-1,050 samples analyzed for: Arsenic, Boron, Bromide, Cadmium, Calcium, Chloride, Chromium, Copper, Fluoride, Iron, Lead, Magnesium, Manganese, Nickel, Nitrate, Nitrite, Potassium, Phosphorus, Phosphate, Rubidium, Sulfate, Silicon, Sodium, Strontium, TDS, and Zinc. The number of values of chloride is approximately five times larger than those in Rapp s (1996) and even larger for other parameters when compared to Rapp s study which was the largest study previously. D. Carlson et al, 2011

Stratigraphy Difference of chemistry among Wilcox sands D. Carlson et al, 2011

D. Carlson et al, 2011

1000 calcium concentration (mg/l) 100 10 1 upper sand lower sand 0.1 Calcium Magnesium 100 D. Carlson et al, 2011 magnesium concentration (mg/l) 10 1 0.1 upper sand lower sand

manganese concentration (mg/l) 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 top of whisker is 0.774 mg/l upper sand lower sand Manganese Nitrate 10 D. Carlson et al, 2011 nitrate concentration (mg/l) 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 upper sand lower sand

1000 sodium concentration (mg/l) 100 10 upper sand lower sand 1 Sodium Chloride 1000 D. Carlson et al, 2011 chloride concentration (mg/l) 100 10 1 upper sand lower sand

Summary Interim Report 1. There have been generally small changes in water chemistry 2. Uncertainty of change tends to increase with decreasing ion concentration 3. Changes are mixed, 6 indicate downward flow of water and 3 indicate upward flow of water 4. Only 4 changes are significant, 2 indicate upward flow and 2 indicate downward flow 5. These mixed results appear to support the idea of downward flow 6. Possible candidates of wells causing downward flow are public supply and other domestic wells, NOT rig wells D. Carlson et al, 2011

Acknowledgements: US EPA Region 6 City of Shreveport AEP SWEPCO LSU Shreveport & LSU System Halliburton Anderson Thank Oil & Gas you! Louisiana Dept. of Natural Resources & Office of Conservation The Parishes of Caddo, DeSoto, Bossier & Webster, Sabine River Authority & Red River Waterway Commission & Metropolitan Planning Commission Members of the Water Energy Working Group Louisiana Geological Survey Union County Conservation Commission

How are Appropriate Water Sources for Hydraulic Fracturing Determined? Pre-development Conditions and Management of Development Phase Water Usage Gary Hanson Louisiana State University Shreveport The statements made during the workshop do not represent the views or opinions of EPA. The claims made by participants have not been verified or endorsed by EPA. Historically the determination of water sources for hydraulic fracturing has typically been left up to the oil or gas operator or their drilling contractor. Fresh water, although only one component of frac fluids in tight gas sand stimulation, was the source of choice and ease of access would determine whether surface or groundwater was used. Prior to multistage horizontal fracing of gas shales, use of ponds or nearby streams provided sufficient water to drill and frac a typical tight sand well in most areas of the country. However as the unconventional shale plays arrived on the scene using slick-water fracing technique and horizontally drilled wells that required multiple stages in order to effectively stimulate the reservoir, water demands increased dramatically. Groundwater, which had been only used periodically in the past, became the source of choice in many areas. Groundwater use for fracing increased in northwest Louisiana after the discovery of the massive Haynesville Shale. The public and rural water utilities saw this activity as a threat to their source of water, so from their perspective a water source (groundwater) that was previously considered an appropriate source for fracing, became an inappropriate source, as drilling and fracing continued. Prior to the onset of the Haynesville Shale gas boom in northwest Louisiana, two critical actions were taken by local government and a university. First, a voluntary water committee called the Water Resources Committee of Northwest Louisiana (WRCNL) was formed and second, one of the member parishes (counties) worked with the local LSU Shreveport University to set up a groundwater monitoring system. Both actions were taken prior to the Haynesville Shale discovery and because there was a perceived need that groundwater and surface water resources were in jeopardy. In some cases, as operators moved into the area multiple Wilcox aquifer water wells were drilled to not only supply water for drilling, but also for fracing. Rig supply wells are considered exempt wells (no notification to Office of Conservation prior to developing) in Louisiana, but groundwater wells used for fracing are considered industrial wells and there is a 60-day pre-drilling notice required. Groundwater use for fracing is not specifically deemed unlawful. As stated earlier, operators have always used groundwater as an appropriate water source for fracing, but with the onset of the Haynesville high volume (5 million gallons), multistage, horizontal well development program, other groundwater users (district water systems, domestic & agriculture) became concerned. For them, groundwater was not an appropriate water source for fracing. The Office of Conservation stepped in and advised that surface water or non-potable aquifer alternatives should be used as a source of water.

In 2001, the Red River Watershed Management Institute (Institute) was formed at LSU Shreveport and the Red River Education & Research Park (RRERP) was developed adjacent to the campus in the floodplain of the Red River. Faculty and students developed monitoring wells in the Red River Alluvial Aquifer (RRAA), an aquifer that had been studied historically by the USGS and other agencies. The RRAA is considered non-potable, but exhibits high deliverability due to its high porosity and high hydraulic conductivity and was a good candidate for alternative groundwater supply for fracing. The RRAA became an appropriate water source for fracing, and although there exists some competition from agriculture, it is deemed sustainable because it is sourced by the overlying Red River which has been impounded for navigation. In the early stages of the Haynesville development, a sub-committee of the WRCNL was formed and met at the Institute. Co-chaired by the Director of the Institute and the Executive Director of the Red River Waterway Commission, the Water Energy Working Group (WEWG) was comprised of federal and state regulators, operators and water transfer specialists. Although many Haynesville Shale operators had become convinced that they needed to reduce their dependence on the Wilcox Aquifer, appropriate alternatives could not be used without some kind of approval process. The WEWG worked to establish USACE permits for access to the Red River. Following formal opinions by the Louisiana Attorney General and legislation that would allow for the states running surface water, including the Red River, to be withdrawn legally, operators were given surface water alternative. Private ponds became an easy and appropriate source of surface water in areas remote from large waterbodies. If landowners filled the ponds using groundwater wells, however, the pond is not considered an appropriate water source for fracing by the state. Has the Wilcox aquifer been changed by Haynesville Shale drilling activity in northwest Louisiana? A study of up to 1000 domestic wells located in the areas of gas shale development, was undertaken by the Louisiana Geological Survey /LSU in cooperation with the watershed Institute at LSU Shreveport. Over one-third of the wells have been sampled and analyzed. About 75 domestic wells that were used in a previous study have been included (re-sampled and analyzed). No significant change in water quality has been observed at this point in the project. A project in nearby south Arkansas has been challenged to develop a recovery plan for Sparta Aquifer, historically the main source of water for pubic and industrial use. This successful project, which funded the construction of a 20-mile pipeline to a large river in order to supply water for industrial needs, allowed industry to stop drawing water from the aquifer and should be a model for the nation. A potential unconventional gas play is in the early stages of development in South Arkansas/North Louisiana and the Union County Water Conservation Board has the potential to supply about 20 million gallons of surface water as an appropriate water source for fracing. 5