Preliminary Cost Benefit Analysis CS#7 Network Infrastructure Performance Monitoring and Analysis

Similar documents
Overview of NM and CDM

From patchwork to network:

COMMITTEE ON AVIATION ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (CAEP)

CS#7 Network Infrastructure Performance monitoring and analysis Service (NIPS) Eric Potier

PRESENTATION. Patrick Ky Executive Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION

CS5 EAIMS Call For Interest Technical annexe

Creating the Functional Airspace Block Europe Central

Air Navigation Service Charges in Europe

The Total Economic Value. Its application to the Single European Sky 2nd Reference Period

North European Functional Airspace Block Avinor, Norway EANS, Estonia Finavia, Finland LGS, Latvia. NEFAB Project CHANGE MANAGEMENT MANUAL

The Virtual Centre Model

The SESAR programme: Making air travel safer, cheaper and more efficient

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Accompanying the document. Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION

SESAR Studies & Demonstration Projects on RPAS & Cyber-Security

NEFAB Project Initiative 9 Commonality of CNS/ATM Systems

EUROCONTROL WORKSHOP. Centralised Services: A closer look at the Flight Plan and Airport Slot Consistency Service (CS1) Andy Woollin

Advanced Data Link Infrastructure Solution for Next Generation of Air Traffic Management

Integrated surface management Herve Drevillon (DSNA) Airport safety support tools for pilots, vehicle drivers and controllers Nicolas Leon (DSNA)

Network Manager Annual Report 2012

EASA s perspective on ATCO licensing and language proficiency

ESSIP OUTLINE DESCRIPTION FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL IN ATM

NEFAB ANSP Programme Business Plan ANSCB meeting 12 October 2015

SESAR Air Traffic Management Modernization. Honeywell Aerospace Advanced Technology June 2014

PCP Active ECAC FCM05 REG ASP MIL APO USE INT IND NM

ICAO Strategic Objective: Economic Development of Air Transport Electronic Tools for Dissemination of Air Transport Data

THE SESAR CONCEPT AND SWIM. David Bowen Head of ATM Operations & Systems SESAR Joint Undertaking

PENS. Centralised Service on Pan European Network Services (PENS) Concept of Operations (CONOPS) EUROCONTROL

International Civil Aviation Organization WORLDWIDE AIR TRANSPORT CONFERENCE (ATCONF) SIXTH MEETING. Montréal, 18 to 22 March 2013

European ADS-B Regulation

Choosing the right revenue management service

European AIS Database - EAD 10+ years of EAD. Guido HAESEVOETS Gaston LIEGEOIS EAD Client Management 28/01/2016

First ATC Support Tools Implementation (FASTI) Validation Plan

Block 0: Capabilities within our Grasp

A consultancy perspective: Building consensus on wildlife monitoring

Equipping Our Human Resources to work in a regional framework Towards Global ATFM Delivering ATM Ops Performance via Regional Network Collaboration

ESM Management Comments on Board of Auditors Annual Report to the Board of Governors for the period ended 31 December 2014

PRR Performance Review Report. An Assessment of Air Traffic Management in Europe during the Calendar Year 2014

SESAR RPAS R&D ROADMAP DEVELOPMENT

EUROCONTROL Training 2015 EUROCONTROL

BRIEF POLICY. Cost-benefit analysis for gasinfrastructure. Authors: Nico Keyaerts, Jean-Michel Glachant. Issue 2014/03 February 2014.

EUROCONTROL. Standard Inputs for EUROCONTROL Cost Benefit Analyses

EUROCONTROL Training 2016 EUROCONTROL

Enterprise Risk Management (ERM): In Action. January Co-presented by: Michael Yip, Marsh Risk Consulting Norma Essary, DFW International Airport

airsight Company Profile

SESAR. Luftfahrttechnologie - Auftaktveranstaltung zum 7. EU-Forschungsrahmenprogramm Wien, 4 Dezember 2006

By CDG 450 Connectivity Special Interest Group (450 SIG)

Asset Management Policy for Major PFI Projects

AeroMACS Briefing / Update

Forecast Scenarios MULTI-YEAR REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS. Five-Year Financial Plan

WP2.2.2 Benefit Assessment

Título ponencia: RNP APCH Implementation

Formulating an energy management action plan

PLANNIN WORKING PAPER. International. Theme 1: WORK. (Presented by SUMMARY. in this paper. feasibility of. system in the future.

Traffic Flow Management. December 2010

Air Traffic Management

European Air Traffic Management Master Plan Edition 1-30 March 2009

SESAR BENEFITS: TOMORROW STARTS NOW

EUROCONTROL COOPERATIVE NETWORK DESIGN

VoIP Workbook. VoIP Workbook. Copyright Page 1

Bodily Injury Thematic Review

European GNSS Applications in Horizon 2020

Keys to a Successful Outsourcing Transition

Air Navigation Charges Services EUROCONTROL can provide

18/01/2012. This working MIDAD. The. Action by the - AIS/MAP. TF/6 Report Report. 1.1 The. Recovery, paper is based SUMMARY REFERENCES

Analytics That Allow You To See Beyond The Cloud. By Alex Huang, Ph.D., Head of Aviation Analytics Services, The Weather Company, an IBM Business

REACT4C (FP7) Climate optimised Flight Planning

Aviation Demand Forecasting

Is your SIEM ready.???

Professional Services. Consulting Solutions for the Aerospace Industry

Consequential Life Cycle Analysis Case study of the biomass

The Power of Risk, Compliance & Security Management in SAP S/4HANA

Macro-economic impact of Renewable Energy Production in Belgium. 21 October 2014

CRV Terms of Reference. Chonlawit Banphawatthanarak CRV TF Chairman MID IP Network Workshop (Cairo, Egypt, January 2016)

State Energy Forecasting An Overview of Methods. Denise Mulholland, USEPA June 19, 2008

Pricing Framework July 2012

Cost Benefit Analysis for Electricity Balancing general methodology

Space Based ADS-B. Transforming the Way you See the Sky March, COPYRIGHT 2014 AIREON LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Productivity Improvement through Integrated Business Planning (IBP) Rafiqul Islam, Senior Director, Global Bioanalytical Services

Regional Transport in Canterbury Health Impact Analysis Dynamic Simulation Model

Transcription:

Preliminary Cost Benefit Analysis CS#7 Network Infrastructure Performance Monitoring and Analysis Alberto Varano Principal Director Resources 8 July 2013

CBA Method Preliminary CBA at feasibility stage to assess value of the CS concept CBA compares 2 scenarios: Current best case fragmented implementation inc. FAB deployments and SESAR Common Project deployments Deployment of Centralised Service For robust CBA, uncertainties addressed through conservative assumptions: High for Centralised Service Scenario Low for Fragmented scenario

CBA Method (2) CBA quantifies impact of deploying CS on aviation stakeholders: ANSP, EUROCONTROL, Airlines and other Airspace Users CBA takes account of Investment costs, Operating and Maintenance Operational benefits such as fuel burn, ATCO productivity and QoS The cost and benefit impact of time to operations Not included in the CBA: knock on effects on costs and benefits of enabling better performance (e.g. better data quality will lead to improvement of services) Impact of tendering the services. The competition in tendering, can lead to best innovative solutions in the most cost efficient conditions An external company will validate EUROCONTROL CBAs

CBA Scenarios Fragmented Scenario: Each ANSP will investigate issues and measures performance on their own to meet the EU regulations. The same issue might be investigated several times. The current ECTRL service will continue. Centralised Service: An enhanced CS will be provided to ANSP. The collection and management of anomalies, analysis of data and management of specific sensors will be tendered. Timeframe: The CBA compares the centralised service with the baseline fragmented deployment scenario. CS7: Development: 2014-2015; Fully Operational in 2016 Fragmented Scenario: Current situation Preliminary Cost Benefit Analysis CS#7 4

CBA Dates Fragmented Scenario Development Start Deployment End Deployment Start Full CBA Time Horizon N/a N/a N/a On going On going 2014-2030 Centralised Service (CS#7) Development (improvement s) Start Deployment of Improvements End Deployment Start Full CBA Time Horizon 2014-2015 2015 2015 2016 2016 2014-2030 Preliminary Cost Benefit Analysis CS#7 5

Centralised Service vs Fragmented Network Infrastructure Performance Monitoring and Analysis Service (NIPS) Operational Benefits Investment Operating & Maintenance ATCO Time to Fuel burn / Route Extension CO2 Tax Savings ATCO productivity QoS (Capacity, Delay..) CS #7 ensures that the QoS is achieved through pro-active detection and resolution of Data link and Surveillance deficiencies. These deficiencies can reduce ATCO productivity and network capacity. Preliminary Cost Benefit Analysis CS#7 6

CS#7 will achieve cost reduction through lower operating & maintenance costs compared to a scenario where each ANSP in the EU will have to investigate issues on their own. There might also be some synergies and reduction in maintenance cost due to the fact that different activities currently under this service in EUROCONTROL are outsourced to different companies Investment Operating & Maintenance ATCO Time to Other + - 0 0 0 CS#7 is estimated to cost 2.4 M in development CS#7 will cost 4.8M per year vs. 9.4 M in fragmented deployment No impact No impact No other impact assessed Preliminary Cost Benefit Analysis CS#7 7

Preliminary Cost Benefit Analysis Results CS#7 Network Infrastructure Performance Monitoring and Analysis

Deployment of CS#7 reduces European ANS costs by approximately 4 M a year Total cost saving with CS#7 is 67 M in 2014-2030 Fragmented Deployment Annual Operating Operational Benefits Cumulated Cost 2014-2030 9 M Not quantified 141 M undiscounted CS#7 Network Infrastructure Performance Monitoring and Analysis Annual Operating Operational Benefits Cumulated Cost 2014-2030 5 M Not quantified 74 M undiscounted Preliminary Cost Benefit Analysis CS#7 9

The initial investment in CS#7 will be paid back in 2016 reaching a total cost saving of 67 M by 2030 160,00 140,00 120,00 Cumulated Cost of Fragmented vs Centralised Deployment 141 Millions of Euros 100,00 80,00 60,00 40,00 20,00 0,00 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 74 CS7 Centralised Service (Cumulated undiscounted) Fragmented Deployment (Cumulated undiscounted) Preliminary Cost Benefit Analysis CS#7 10