% of Recovery Home Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 30 Days SFY11 Level Target



Similar documents
2012 (#): (0121) SFY

Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Quarter 1

SFY (#): (0631) 09/30/ SFY14

Date of Report: 09/30/2014 Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY 2014 Quarter* Level I - Engagement

Provider Name (#): Jefferson County Comprehensive Services (0225) Page 1

Crosswalk Management System

The NJSAMS Report. Heroin Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment in New Jersey. In Brief. New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System.

AN ASSESSMENT OF PUBLICLY FUNDED ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUG PROGRAMS IN CALIFORNIA Melinda M. Hohman. John D. Clapp

Colorado Substance Abuse Treatment Clients with Co-Occurring Disorders, FY05

As the proportion of racial/

Kathryn P. Jett Director

Crosswalk Management System

Client Population Statistics

JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM

Treatment completion is an

Special Treatment/Recovery Programs -- Participant Demographics

CCC Hooper Detoxification Stabilization Center. Accessing Services

Los Angeles County Department of Health Services Alcohol and Drug Program Administration

Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) Highlights National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services

12 & 12, INC. FY 15 ANNUAL MANAGEMENT REPORT

Age # % State Avg % 16% % 24% % 19% % 23% % 14% % 4% Ethnicity # % State Avg

MONROE COUNTY OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES RECOVERY CONNECTION PROJECT PROGRAM EVALUATION DECEMBER 2010

MAIL: Recovery Center Missoula FAX: Wyoming St. OR ATTN: Admissions Missoula, MT ATTN: Admissions

Pregnant Women Entering Substance Abuse Treatment for the First Time: 10 Year Trends

Addiction Severity Index Fifth Edition

New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System (NJ-SAMS) Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions 1/1/ /31/2013 Resident of Cape May County

ACCOUNTABILITY COURT DATA. Ren Yang Hafner, Operations Analyst Statistical Analysis Center Criminal Justice Coordinating Council

HowHow to Identify the Best Stock Broker For You

Sacramento County 2010

Drug Use, Testing, and Treatment in Jails By Doris James Wilson BJS Statistician

Annual Report on Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

FY 2012 Block Grant Reporting Section

Substance Abuse Overview 2014 Statewide

Quarterly Form (SAP Online), Page 1

San Diego County 2010

Application for Free Home Repairs

An integrated approach to addressing opiate abuse in Maine. Debra L. Brucker, MPA, PhD State of Maine Office of Substance Abuse October 2009

o Please include me on the ACCBO List

Annual Report on Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

Please answer all questions which apply to you and mark those that do not apply with N/A. LAST NAME FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAME

Total Males Females (0.4) (1.6) Didn't believe entitled or eligible 13.0 (0.3) Did not know how to apply for benefits 3.4 (0.

Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS) National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services

California Northstate University College of Pharmacy Transfer Student Application

Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Involving Abuse of Pain Relievers: 1998 and 2008

How To Identify A Substance Abuse/Addiction Counselor

alcohol and drug Treatment Services Report Hawai i,

Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions for Abuse of Benzodiazepines

Substance Abuse Overview 2013

Division of Behavioral Health Services

Substance Abuse Overview 2014 Hunterdon County

Recovery Services of Northwest Ohio, Inc.

Survey of Structure and Operations (TCU SSO)

Patient Satisfaction Survey Results

Child & Adolescent Quality Access and Policy Committee Residential Treatment Centers Friday June 20, 2014

College of Medicine Enrollment MD and MD/MPH Fall 2002 to Fall 2006

Presentation to the Boston HIV Planning Council. Lydie Ultimo, MSW Director Bureau of Substance Abuse Services

March Senior Executive Service Report

Trends in Adult Female Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions Reporting Primary Alcohol Abuse: 1992 to Alcohol abuse affects millions of

Substance Abuse Overview 2014 Morris County

Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program

University of Illinois College of Veterinary Medicine Coordinated Degree Program Application Package Augustana College 2015

There are 5 demographic data elements that include gender, date of birth, race, ethnicity status,

Dallas Nursing Institute N. Abrams Rd, Suite 200, Dallas, TX 75243

Evaluation of Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes

UTAH DIVISION OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL HEALTH SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER SERVICES MONITORING CHECKLIST (FY 2014) GENERAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS

a lc ohol a n d dru g Treatment Services Hawai i, 5-Year Trends ( )

UNDERGRADUATE NON-DEGREE ENROLLMENT FORM

School of Social Work University of Missouri Columbia

A Preliminary Assessment of Risk and Recidivism of Illinois Prison Releasees

Estimated Population Responding on Item 25,196,036 2,288,572 3,030,297 5,415,134 4,945,979 5,256,419 4,116,133 Medicare 39.3 (0.2)

Special Report Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners, 1997

ASPIRA Management Information System OJJDP General Intake Information

Substance Abuse Treatment Statistics Barnstable County Residents Focus on 2007 to July 25, 2013

Alcohol and Drug Abuse Treatment Centers

Overall, 67.8% of the 404,638 state

NON-DEGREE STUDENT APPLICATION PROCESS

Application deadline is August 1, 2016 for Fall Semester; December 1, 2016 for Spring Semester.

Haverhill. Change in 58,969 60,953 1,984

How to Handle Telephone Calls About Breastfeeding

CHAPTER 3: Patient Admissions to Treatment for Abuse of Alcohol and Drugs in Appalachia,

Annual Report on Substance Abuse Treatment Programs

WITS (Web Infrastructure for Treatment Services).

Statewide Evaluation of 2003 Iowa Adult and Juvenile Drug Courts

Demographic Profile of Wichita Unemployment Insurance Beneficiaries Q3 2015

New Jersey Substance Abuse Monitoring System (NJ-SAMS) Substance Abuse Treatment Admissions 1/1/ /31/2013 Resident of Camden County

Drexel University College of Medicine

Thirty-First Judicial District DUI / Drug Court EVALUATION

Highlights from State Reports to the National Youth in Transition Database, Federal Fiscal Year 2011

EmployAble Pilot Study. Participant Screening and Pre-Survey

Dodge-Fillmore- Olmsted Methamphetamine Treatment Project. July 2006-December 2007 evaluation report

Substance Abuse Treatment Services Objective and Performance Measures

Transportation Construction Apprenticeship Readiness Training T.C.A.R.T. Cell Phone Date of Birth (mm/dd/yyyy) Gender: Male

EMPLOYMENT APPLICATION

How To Calculate The Cost Of A Jail Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program

Vermont s Experience A Systematic Approach to Health Care Integration Barbara Cimaglio, Deputy Commissioner. NASADAD 2015 Annual Meeting

Trends Related to the Certification of Juveniles as Adults

Customer Experience Survey Findings, 2014 Wisconsin s Publicly Supported Outpatient Substance Use Services

Substance Abuse Treatment Needs, Capacity and Costs

Outcomes for People on Allegheny County Community Treatment Teams

Residential SOAP and Inpatient Dual Diagnosis Comparisons Consumer Satisfaction Report, Addendum to Inpatient Aggregate Report

Transcription:

Provider Performance and Outcomes Report Dashboard Summary Table - SFY 2011 Provider Name (#): Continuing Recovery Center (0107) Date of Report: 09/30/2012 Access/Capacity, Engagement, Retention and Continuity of Care Measure Status by Level of Care and SFY Quarter* Recovery Home - Engagement Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 SFY Cumulative % of Recovery Home Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 7 Days SFY11 Level Target Statewide 83.8% N.A. 86.5% (283) 78.4% (222) 90.0% (253) 79.4% (313) 83.3% (1071) Region IV 87.8% N.A. 100.0% (12) 100.0% (12) 100.0% (10) 100.0% (7) 100.0% (41) Provider N.A. N.A. 100.0% (8) 100.0% (7) 100.0% (5) 100.0% (7) 100.0% (27) Recovery Home - Retention Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 SFY Cumulative % of Recovery Home Clients/Length of Stay of At Least 30 Days SFY11 Level Target Statewide 52.2% N.A. 61.8% (202) 55.5% (157) 58.4% (164) 49.7% (196) 56.0% (719) Region IV 69.4% N.A. 100.0% (12) 91.7% (11) 80.0% (8) 71.4% (5) 87.8% (36) Provider N.A. N.A. 100% (8) 100.0% (7) 80.0% (4) 71.4% (5) 88.9% (24) Recovery Home - Continuity of Care Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4 SFY Cumulative % of Discharged Clients/Completed Tx/+ NOMS Status SFY11 Level Target Statewide 69.1% N.A. 69.4% (195) 76.8% (169) 68.8% (119) 66.5% (171) 70.2% (654) Region IV 11.4% N.A. 18.2% (2) 60.0% (10) 25.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 28.1% (9) Provider N.A. N.A. 100.0% (7) 100.0% (5) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 23.8% (5) Note: Baseline data denoted by BOLD FONT *Performance measure levels for a particular quarter are based on service billings accepted in DARTS as of the date of the report for clients opened during that quarter. Page 1

Employment Status - Clients Employed (Full-time or Part-time) at Provider Region IV Statewide Admission vs. Discharge. (Excludes Clients not in Labor Force) Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Employment Status** # of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time (Numerator) 0 0 7 7 110 240 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 1 1 10 10 809 809 % of Clients Employed Full-time or Part-time. 0.0% 0.0% 70.0% 70.0% 13.6% 29.7% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2012 who were discharged as of 09/30/2012. Clients with missing values for employment status or who are reported to not be in the labor force at either admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 2

Housing Status - Clients with Stable Housing (Independent Provider Region IV Statewide Living) at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Housing Status** # of Clients with Stable Housing (Numerator) 3 4 4 6 134 195 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 20 20 30 30 1,040 1,040 % of Clients with Stable Housing. 15.0% 20.0% 13.3% 20.0% 12.9% 18.8% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2012 who were discharged as of 09/30/2012. Clients with missing values for housing status at either admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 3

Criminal Justice Status - Clients with No Arrests during Provider Region IV Statewide the Prior 30 Days at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Criminal Justice Status** # of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days (Numerator) 21 21 32 32 805 1,041 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 21 21 32 32 1,058 1,058 % of Clients with No Arrests/Prior 30 Days. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 76.1% 98.4% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2012 who were discharged as of 09/30/2012. Clients with missing values for number of arrests in the prior 30 days at either admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 4

Alcohol Abstinence - Clients with No Alcohol Use at Provider Region IV Statewide Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Alcohol Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use (Numerator) 4 7 5 8 264 352 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 8 8 11 11 416 416 % of Clients Abstinent from Alcohol Use. 50.0% 87.5% 45.5% 72.7% 63.5% 84.6% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2012 who were discharged as of 09/30/2012. Clients with missing values for both primary and secondary substance type and/or frequency at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 5

Other Drug Abstinence - Clients with No Use of Drugs Other Provider Region IV Statewide than Alcohol at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Other Drug Abstinence** # of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use (Numerator) 10 12 13 15 380 462 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 12 12 15 15 607 607 % of Clients Abstinent from Other Drug Use. 83.3% 100.0% 86.7% 100.0% 62.6% 76.1% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2012 who were discharged as of 09/30/2012. Clients with missing values for both primary and secondary substance type and/or frequency at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 6

Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement - Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement/Prior 30 Days at Provider Region IV Statewide Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Self-Help Group Involvement** # of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement (Numerator) 18 19 28 29 604 802 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 19 19 29 29 979 979 % of Clients with Self-Help Group Involvement. 94.7% 100.0% 96.6% 100.0% 61.7% 81.9% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2012 who were discharged as of 09/30/2012. Clients with missing values for self-help group involvement at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 7

Social Connectedness/Supportive Social Interaction - Clients with Supportive Interaction with Family and/or Friends/Prior Provider Region IV Statewide 30 Days at Admission vs. Discharge. Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Admission Discharge Recovery Home Client Outcome Measures - Social Connectedness/Supportive Interaction** # of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction (Numerator) 18 19 28 29 778 905 Total # of Discharged Clients in Comparison (Denominator). 19 19 29 29 961 961 % of Clients with Supportive Social Interaction. 94.7% 100.0% 96.6% 100.0% 81.0% 94.2% **Comparisons based on clients opened during State Fiscal Year 2012 who were discharged as of 09/30/2012. Clients with missing values for supportive interaction at admission or discharge are excluded. Clients who are deceased or incarcerated at time of discharge are also excluded. Page 8

Illinois Department of Human Services Division of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Provider Performance and Outcomes Reports - SFY 2012 Admitted Patient/Client Demographics Provider Organization (Provider #) Continuing Recovery Center (0107) Total # of Admissions: 27 Average Age at Opening: 40.4 Gender Living Arrangements % (#) Unduplicated: 100.0% (27) % Under 18 Years of Age: 0.0% (0) Male: 63.0% (17) Independent Living: 11.1% (3) Female: 37.0% (10) Dependent Living: 88.9% (24) # (%) of Admissions by Level of Care Race Detoxification: 0 (0.0%) American Indian: 0.0% (0) Hispanic Ethnicity Level I: 0 (0.0%) Alaska Native: 0.0% (0) Puerto Rican: 0.0% (0) Employment Status Level II: 0 (0.0%) Asian: 0.0% (0) Mexican: 0.0% (0) Full-Time: 0.0% (0) Level III.5: 0 (0.0%) Native Hawaiian/Pac. Isl: 0.0% (0) Cuban: 0.0% (0) Part-Time: 0.0% (0) Level III.1: 0 (0.0%) Black/African American: 3.7% (1) Other Hispanic/Latino: 0.0% (0) Unemployed: 3.7% (1) Recovery Home: 27 (100.0%) White: 96.3% (26) Not Hispanic/Latino: 100.0% (27) Not in Labor Force: 96.3% (26) Assessment Only: 0 (0.0%) Other Single Race: 0.0% (0) Hisp./Latino, Not Specified: 0.0% (0) Educational Level Patient Speaks English: 100.0% (80) Average Grade Completed: 11.9 MISA Patient/Client: 0.0% (0) Problem Area % (#) Less than H.S.: 7.4% (2) Veteran Status: Yes - 3.7% (1) Alcohol: 25.9% (7) Crim. Justice Referral: 7.4% (2) Other Drugs: 14.8% (4) Primary Care Giver for Children Pregnant at Opening: 0.0% (0) Alcohol & Other Drugs: 59.3% (16) Yes: 0.0% (0) Arrested/Past 30 Days: 0.0% (0) Alcohol/Drugs/Gambling: 0.0% (0) Avg. # of Children: 0.0 DCFS Involved: 14.8% (4) Gambling Only: 0.0% (0) Primary Substance Secondary Substance Alcohol: 48.1% (13); Cocaine/Crack: 22.2% (6); Marijuana/Hashish: 0.0% (0) Alcohol: 29.6% (8); Cocaine/Crack: 7.4% (2); Marijuana/Hashish: 11.1% (3) Heroin: 22.2% (6) Heroin: 0.0% (0); Other Opiates: 7.4% (2); None: 40.7% (11) Used Primary Substance/30 Days Prior to Opening: 22.2% (6) Used Secondary Substance/30 Days Prior to Opening: 3.7% (1) Organization-wide Patient/Client Access and Discharge Indicators Average Duration from Initial Contact to Opening Date Median Duration from Initial Contact to Opening Date % (#) of Admissions - No Reported Wait for Assessment % (#) of Discharged Patients/Clients - Completion of Services % (#) of Patients/Clients - Remain Opened/90 Days After Close of SFY SFY 2012 Statewide - SFY 2012 15.6 Days 9.1 Days 12.0 Days 1.0 Days 0.0% (0) 49.8% (35,447) 23.8% (5) 46.3% (26,041) 22.2% (6) 20.7% (14,718) Page 9