How To Calculate The Cost Of A Jail Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program
|
|
|
- Blaze Patrick
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program Cost Analysis Study Prepared By: Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse Research and Evaluation University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa With Funds Provided By: Iowa Department of Public Health, Division of Behavioral Health and Professional Licensure; U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance
2 Citation of references related to this report is appreciated. Suggested citation: Hedden, S., Barber, K., & Arndt, S. (2006). Jail Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program: Cost Analysis Study (Iowa Department of Public Health, Contract No. 5887JT04). Iowa City, IA: Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse Research and Evaluation.
3 Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program Cost Analysis Study Prepared By: Suzy Hedden, BS, Program Evaluation Coordinator Kristina Barber, MSM, Associate Director Stephan Arndt, PhD, Director 2006 The University of Iowa
4 Overview The cost analysis study of the Iowa Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program provides an economic perspective on the cost of treatment provision compared to the cost of a prison sentence. The sample for this project includes the 408 clients admitted to the Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program between July 1, 2004 and June 30, 2005 at the 3 treatment agencies in Iowa involved in this program: United Community Services, Inc., Center for Alcohol and Drug Services, Inc., and Jackson Recovery Centers. The Jail Treatment Program is less than half of the cost of prison. The average daily cost for a client in the Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program was $30.19 compared to $64.02, which is the daily rate to house an inmate in a state prison facility in Iowa. Cost Per Day: Jail Based Treatment Versus Prison $70.00 $60.00 $50.00 $40.00 $30.00 $20.00 $10.00 $0.00 $30.19 Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program $64.02 Prison The majority of the jail based treatment clients who were interviewed tend to maintain abstinence, do not get arrested, and obtain full-time employment. Client abstinence increased by 82.4 percentage points from admission and maintained a 75.5% rate at the 12 month follow-up. A large percentage of clients were arrest free at Interview 1 lowering somewhat at Interview 2, but remained high at 80.2%. More clients were employed full-time at the 12 month interview. % of Clients 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0% 82.4% 0% 75.5% 0.8% Outcomes 91.6% 1.4% 80.2% 52.9% 60.4% 41.6% 41.5% Admission (238 Clients) Interview 1 (238 Clients) Admission (212 Clients) Interview 2 (212 Clients) Abstinence No Arrests Employed Full-Time i
5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction Method... 1 Study Questions... 1 Program... 1 Sample Description... 2 Measures... 2 Cost Effectiveness Calculations... 2 Diagram 1: Treatment Costs... 2 Diagram 2: Cost of Incarceration in Jail... 3 Diagram 3: Cost of Treatment in Jail... 3 Diagram 4: Cost of Additional Time in Jail... 3 Diagram 5: Cost of Time in Prison... 4 Diagram 6: Average Cost of Additional Time in Prison... 4 Diagram 7: Cost of Controlled Environments... 5 Diagram 8: Cost of Time in Additional Controlled Environments Results... 5 Diagram 9: Average Daily Cost Per Client in Jail Treatment Program... 6 Diagram 10. Cost Per Day Comparison... 6 Diagram 11: Client Outcomes from Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program... 7 Diagram 12. Comparison of Admission and Interview Outcome Data Discussion... 8 ii
6 The Iowa Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program: Cost Analysis Study An enhancement of the Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program Follow-up Evaluation 1. Introduction The following cost analysis study of the Iowa Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program provides an economic perspective of the provision of substance abuse treatment and aftercare to incarcerated individuals in Polk, Woodbury, and Scott Counties. The analysis involved examining the costs of providing substance abuse treatment to incarcerated clients in county jails and continuing that treatment after release from jail followed by aftercare. The program, designed as a diversion to long prison sentences for drug-involved offenders, was initiated as a pilot in Polk County. The program was expanded to the other two counties and has proven a success through a follow-up evaluation that measures client abstinence, arrests and employment and several other outcomes. This analysis provides cost information on the aspects of treatment provision of the program compared to prison. The Iowa Consortium for Substance Abuse Research and Evaluation (Consortium) conducted a cost analysis of the clients admitted to the Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program. The costs of the Jail Treatment Program were compared to the costs related to incarceration in prison, if the program did not exist as a diversion opportunity to prison, and clients served prison terms versus the program. The Consortium examined the costs of treatment, jail time, and recidivism compared to the costs of time in prison. The purpose of this project was to determine differences in the cost of the program, which involves treatment, support, and aftercare services, versus the cost of a prison sentence. 2. Method Study Questions Three questions are addressed as a result of this analysis: 1) What was the total cost associated with in-jail and post-release community treatment?; 2) Was participation in the Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program more cost effective than not participating?; 3) What conclusions can policy makers draw from the cost information presented in this study? Program The Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment program was established to deliver substance abuse treatment services to clients during incarceration and after release from jail. To determine effectiveness of treatment services, clients are tracked for two follow-up interviews that occur approximately 6 and 12 months after admission to the treatment program. Three treatment agencies in Iowa are involved in this program: United Community Services, Inc. (UCS), a Des Moines-based agency delivering treatment to clients at the Polk County Jail; Center for Alcohol and Drug Services, Inc. (CADS), an agency located in Davenport, Iowa delivering treatment to clients at the Scott County Jail; and Jackson Recovery Centers based in Sioux City, Iowa delivering treatment to clients in Woodbury County Jail. 1
7 Sample Description The sample for this project includes all clients admitted to the Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program between July 1, 2004 and June 30, During this period, 408 clients were admitted to the program: 181 in Polk County, 132 in Scott County, and 95 in Woodbury County. Two hundred ninety-seven (72.8%) of the clients were male and 111 (27.2%) were female. The clients ranged in age from 18 to 61 with a median age of 32 years. This group of clients spent an average of 77 days in the in-jail portion of treatment and 212 days in the treatment program from admission to discharge. Measures The data gathered related to costs of treatment and costs related to incarceration were based on documented actual costs of the Jail Treatment Program and from costs reported by the County Jails and the Iowa Department of Corrections that are based on actual costs. The costs related to the Jail Treatment Program involve time and resources for substance abuse treatment and time and costs of incarceration in the county jails. When clients are released from jail, treatment continues and evolves into aftercare programming. If clients recidivate during this time, costs related to the controlled environment in which they are placed were added program costs. To calculate the alternate consequences to the Jail Treatment Program, a total state cost related to incarceration in prison was obtained from the Iowa Department of Corrections. Cost Effectiveness Calculations Treatment Costs: Treatment costs were directly related to the actual costs of the Jail Treatment Program. Each treatment agency was awarded a contract by the State of Iowa to provide in-jail substance abuse treatment to eligible clients. Agencies were reimbursed monthly on actual expenses related to the program by the Iowa Department of Public Health. The costs of treatment include both administration support and direct treatment services. The reimbursement payments to each agency were examined for the period of July 2004 through June The daily cost of treatment was calculated by dividing the total reimbursed amount for the year examined by the total number of treatment days for all clients served under the Jail Treatment Program in the same time frame. The total program cost for the three agencies was $785, Five hundred ninety-five clients from the three counties spent 79,949 days in treatment (based on admission and discharge dates) from July 1, 2004 to June 30, The average cost of treatment per day was $9.83. Diagram 1: Treatment Costs Program Cost Number of Treatment Days Treatment Cost Per Day $785, ,949 $9.83 Jail Costs: All clients in the Jail Treatment Program begin treatment in county jail facilities: the average length of stay in jail varies by site. The daily rate of jail incarceration was obtained from officials at each county jail. The rates varied by county: $85.52; $65.00; and $ The 408 clients spent a total of 27,230 days in the in-jail portion of the treatment program. The total cost 2
8 for the 27,230 days based on the daily rates provided by each county was $2,054, To determine the average cost per day of the in-jail treatment time, this figure was divided by the number of clients (408) yielding an average cost of $5, per person per year. The average daily cost was determined by dividing the average cost for one year by the number of days in a year (365). The average cost per day of jail for each of the 408 clients from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 was $ Diagram 2: Cost of Incarceration in Jail Program Cost Average Cost per Person per Year Average Daily Cost of Jail $2,054, $5, $13.79 Total Treatment and Jail Costs: To determine the average cost per day for a client receiving treatment in the in-jail phase of treatment, the average cost per day of treatment was added to the average cost per day of incarceration in jail. Diagram 3: Cost of Treatment in Jail Cost Per Day of Treatment Average Daily Cost of Jail Average Cost of Treatment During In-Jail Phase of Treatment $9.83 $13.79 $23.62 Additional time in controlled environments: Upon jail release, many clients spend additional time in controlled environments. Controlled environments include additional time in: jail; prison; halfway houses; residential correctional facilities; residential treatment facilities; OWI facilities; and shelters. These data were obtained from the following sources: client follow-up interviews (question related to additional time in a controlled environment); The Iowa Department of Corrections client management database (ICON), Iowa Courts On-Line, and the Offender Information link on the Iowa Department of Corrections website. Approximately 27% of the clients spent an additional 4,636 days in county jails for a total cost of $321,326.84, based on the average daily rate provided by each county. This additional time in jail was over and above the number of days spent in the in-jail portion of treatment. The average daily cost per client for this additional jail time across all clients was calculated by dividing the total cost by the number of clients (408) by the number of days in a year (365) yielding a rate of $2.16. Diagram 4: Cost of Additional Time in Jail Cost of Additional Time in County Jails Average Cost per Client for Additional Jail Time Average Daily Cost of Additional Jail Time $321, $ $2.16 3
9 Approximately 17% of the clients spent an additional 6,562 days in state prison facilities. Prison costs were obtained from the Iowa Department of Corrections. The cost to house an inmate in Iowa for one year is $23,367. The daily rate is $ The total cost for the 6,562 days of prison time was $420, Diagram 5: Cost of Time in Prison Cost of Additional Prison Time Number of Days Spent in a State Prison Facility Cost Per Day of Prison $420, ,562 $64.02 The average daily rate of $2.82 for additional prison time across all clients was calculated by dividing the total cost of additional time in prison ($420,099.24) by the total number of clients (408) and dividing by the number of days in a year (365). Diagram 6: Average Cost of Additional Time in Prison Cost of Time in State Prison Facilities Average Cost per Client for Prison Time Average Daily Cost of Additional Prison Time $420, $1, $2.82 Approximately 22% of the clients spent an additional 7,963 days in controlled environments including halfway houses, treatment facilities, residential correctional facilities, work release facilities, OWI facilities, and shelters. Clients spent an additional 2,900 days in a variety of different county or state facilities. Each of these types of facilities had varying daily costs, usually well below the daily cost for prison. The figure used to estimate the cost per day for these facilities was the daily rate to house an inmate in prison, $64.02, very likely an overestimate of the actual cost. Clients spent an additional 5,063 days in treatment facilities, halfway houses and shelters. The average daily cost for treatment was $9.83. The majority of the other facilities, such as halfway houses and shelters are mostly private not-for-profit organizations that are supported by the community through local donations. For the purpose of the study, an average daily rate of $10.00 was assigned to these additional controlled environments. The total cost for time spent in additional controlled environments was the sum of the costs in any kind of facility, $236,288.00, as shown in Diagram 7 on the following page. 4
10 Diagram 7: Cost of Controlled Environments Type of Facility Residential Correctional Facility, State-Run Residential Treatment Facility, Work Release Program, OWI Facility Assigned Cost Number of Days Total Cost $ ,900 $185, Halfway Houses, shelters, etc. $ ,063 $50, TOTAL 7,963 $236, To calculate the estimated cost per day of the additional time spent in the various types of controlled environments, the total cost ($236,288.00) was divided by the number of clients (408) to obtain an average cost of $ per client per year. The average daily cost of $1.59 was calculated by dividing $ by the number of days in a year (365). Diagram 8: Cost of Time in Additional Controlled Environments Cost of Time in Additional Controlled Environments 3. Results Average Cost per Client per Year for Additional Controlled Environments Average Daily Cost of Additional Time in Controlled Environments $236, $ $1.59 The average daily cost for a client in the Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program was $ This was obtained by adding the average daily cost of jail, the cost per day of treatment, and the average cost for time spent in additional controlled environments. Diagram 9 on the following page delineates the average daily costs of the Jail Treatment Program for the annual time period of July 1, 2004 through June 30,
11 Diagram 9: Average Daily Cost Per Client in Jail Treatment Program Type of Service Average Daily Cost Jail Time $13.79 Treatment $9.83 Additional Jail Time $2.16 Prison Time $2.82 Additional Time in Controlled Environments $1.59 Approximate Cost per Day for Client in Jail Treatment Program $30.19 The alternate to clients in the program was a prison sentence without treatment services. The daily cost of prison is $64.02 per client. The average client cost for the jail-based program per year was $11, and the annual cost of housing a client in prison was $23,367. Therefore, there is a cost savings of $12, per client per year for involvement in the jail-based treatment program versus a prison sentence. The average daily cost for a client in the Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program for the year July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005 was $30.19 compared to $64.02, which is the daily rate for a client incarcerated in a state prison facility. Diagram 10 shows the cost of the Jail Treatment Program compared to the cost to house an inmate in a state prison facility. Diagram 10. Cost Per Day Comparison Cost Per Day: Jail Based Treatment Versus Prison $70.00 $60.00 $50.00 $40.00 $30.00 $20.00 $10.00 $0.00 $30.19 Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program $64.02 Prison The State of Iowa uses the Substance Abuse Reporting System (SARS) to collect outcome data regarding substance abuse treatment services in the state. Clients in the Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment program are tracked for two follow-up SARS interviews that occur 6
12 approximately 6 and 12 months after admission. The interviews provide data to determine outcomes related to arrests, employment, and abstinence among other outcomes. Of the 408 clients admitted from July 1, 2004 through June 30, 2005, 238 clients have completed Interview 1 (6 months after admission) and 212 clients have completed Interview 2 (12 months after admission). Diagram 11 shows client outcomes at admission, Interview 1 and Interview 2 related to abstinence, arrests and employment. Abstinence is defined as a response of none when asked to name a primary substance of use, and it refers to abstinence from all substances. The outcome no arrests is defined as not having been arrested during the previous six months. Full-time employment is defined as working at least 35 hours per week. Diagram 11: Client Outcomes from Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program N Abstained % (N) No Arrests % (N) Employed Full-Time % (N) Admission (0) 1.0 (4) 35.5 (145) Interview (196) 91.6 (218) 52.9 (126) Interview (160) 80.2 (170) 60.4 (128) Diagram 12 compares the variables between status at admission and status at follow-up on those clients who had a response at both admission and follow-up. Client abstinence increased by 82.4 percentage points from admission and maintained a 75.5% rate at the 12 month follow-up. A large percentage of clients were arrest free at Interview 1 lowering somewhat at Interview 2, but remained high at 80.2%. More clients were employed full-time (35 or more hours a week) at the 12 month interview. Clients employed full or part time comprised 74.5% of the interviewed clients 12 months after admission. The majority of the clients interviewed remained abstinent, arrest free and had full-time employment. In contrast, at admission to the program, 100% of the clients reported substance use. Further, all were arrested one or more times or were incarcerated in the 12 months prior to admission into the program. Diagram 12. Comparison of Admission and Interview Outcome Data % of Clients 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0% 82.4% 0% 75.5% 0.8% Outcomes 91.6% 1.4% 80.2% 52.9% 60.4% 41.6% 41.5% Abstinence No Arrests Employed Full-Time Admission (238 Clients) Interview 1 (238 Clients) Admission (212 Clients) Interview 2 (212 Clients) 7
13 4. Discussion According to the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin (November 2006, in 2005 the nation s prison population grew 1.9% and Iowa experienced a prison population increase of 2.5%. Iowa was one of the 23 states who reported operating at 100% or more of their highest capacity. Iowa prisons were operating at 21% above capacity at year end 2005, and only 4 states reported a custody population percentage higher than Iowa. When examining the 408 clients participating in the Jail Treatment Program from July 1, 2004 to June 30, 2005, 72.1% of the clients are not incarcerated 12 months post-admission. If participation in this program can keep approximately 72% of the clients out of the prison system by offering a substance abuse treatment program which includes education on criminal thinking in an attempt to reduce criminal behavior, the program helps reduce prison population in the State of Iowa. The Iowa Department of Corrections (DOC) has seen the prison population grow by nearly 400% in the past 10 years to a total exceeding 8,000. At the same time, community correction programs have expanded, much of the increase due to legislative decisions in the early 1990s creating harsher penalties for drug offenses, and longer sentences for a variety of criminal offenders. Eighty to ninety percent of the prison population experience substance abuse disorders and twenty to forty percent have co-occurring disorders. It is widely recognized that individuals with co-occurring mental and addictive disorders are a large and significantly underserved population. Further, the Jail-Based Treatment Program helps alleviate prison management issues such as overpopulation by making more prison beds available for violent, dangerous offenders. The results of the cost analysis support the potential of the provision of substance abuse treatment to incarcerated individuals to reduce reincarceration and criminal recidivism for drug offenders. Based on the results of this study, the State of Iowa benefits from the investment in jail-based substance abuse treatment programs. The Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program is less than half of the cost of prison. Had the 408 clients gone to a state prison facility on the day they were admitted to the Jail-Based Substance Abuse Treatment Program and remained in prison through June 30, 2005, the number of incarceration days would have been 76,856. At a cost of $64.02 per day for prison, the cost to the state would have been $4,920,321.12, which is 2.1 times higher than the cost for the same individuals to participate in the Jail Treatment Program at $30.19 per day for a total of $2,320, The benefit of providing this treatment has a value added quality through direct contributions to society as a whole. The majority of the jail based treatment clients tend to maintain abstinence, do not get arrested, and obtain full-time employment. They become contributing members of society, which provides both economical and social benefits. The economy benefits from contributions such as rent/mortgage, purchased goods and services, and revenue from an array of taxes in addition to income. The social benefits involve relationships with family and transition into the community. When considering the average daily cost of prison ($64.02), these results suggest that offering treatment services to incarcerated individuals and moving them to continuing care services upon release is a cost effective policy tool. 8
JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM
JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM Enhancement of Employment Support Services THE IOWA CONSORTIUM FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE RESEARCH AND EVALUATION Year One Evaluation Report October 2015 With
Three Year Recidivism Tracking of Offenders Participating in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs
Three Year Recidivism Tracking of Offenders Participating in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs Prepared for the 76 th Texas Legislature, 1999 Criminal Justice Policy Council Tony Fabelo, Ph.D. Executive
Iowa Department of Corrections. Report to the Board of Corrections
THOMAS J. VILSACK, GOVERNOR SALLY J. PEDERSON, LT. GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS GARY D. MAYNARD, DIRECTOR Iowa Department of Corrections Report to the Board of Corrections Substance Abuse First in
The Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Program: Evaluation and Recommendations
The Substance Abuse Felony Punishment Program: Evaluation and Recommendations Criminal Justice Policy Council Prepared for the 77 th Texas Legislature, 2001 Tony Fabelo, Ph.D. Executive Director The Substance
Services Provided for Polk County Residents
Providing Successful, Evidence-Based Substance Abuse and Mental Health Treatment to Men, Women and Adolescents in Polk, Highlands and Hardee Counties for over 39 years. 1 Services Provided for Polk County
Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) DWI Addiction Treatment Programs (ATP) Outcome Study for DWI Offenders
Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) DWI Addiction Treatment Programs (ATP) Outcome Study for DWI Offenders Prepared for: The DWI Addiction Treatment Programs (ATP) Metropolitan Detention Center Prepared
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) of Drug Abuse Treatment for Criminal Justice Populations From The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) 2. Why should drug abuse treatment be provided to offenders?
Con-Quest Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Program Outcome Evaluation. February 2004
Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Program Outcome Evaluation February 2004 Introduction The link between drugs and crime in the United States is widely accepted. Drug users frequently commit crime
Offender Screening. Oklahoma Department of Mental health and Substance Abuse Services
Offender Screening Oklahoma Department of Mental health and Substance Abuse Services Presenters DR. DAVID WRIGHT, EVALUATION PROJECTS MANAGER NISHA WILSON, STATE DIRECTOR OF SPECIALTY COURTS The Problem
DRAFT Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) DWI Addiction Treatment Programs (ATP) Outcome Study Final Report UPDATED
DRAFT Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) DWI Addiction Treatment Programs (ATP) Outcome Study Final Report UPDATED Prepared for: The DWI Addiction Treatment Programs (ATP) Metropolitan Detention Center
WHAT IS THE ILLINOIS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AND HOW DID IT START? MISSION STATEMENT
WHAT IS THE ILLINOIS CENTER OF EXCELLENCE AND HOW DID IT START? MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Illinois Center of Excellence for Behavioral Health and Justice is to equip communities to appropriately
Michigan Drug Court Recidivism. Definitions and Methodology
Michigan Drug Court Recidivism Definitions and Methodology Michigan Supreme Court State Court Administrative Office Introduction Drug courts serve nonviolent offenders with drug or alcohol substance use
Division of Alcoholism and Chemical Dependency Programs
Division of Alcoholism and Chemical Dependency Programs Virginia N. Price Assistant Secretary Wrenn Rivenbark Clinical Director Current Prison Population Prison Inmates 39,463 Male Inmates 36,608 Female
A Preliminary Assessment of Risk and Recidivism of Illinois Prison Releasees
A Preliminary Assessment of Risk and Recidivism of Illinois Prison Releasees David E. Olson & Gipsy Escobar Department of Criminal Justice Loyola University Chicago Presented at the Justice Research and
How To Save Money On Drug Sentencing In Michigan
Drug Policies in the State of Michigan Economic Effects Executive Summary News Walker: Keep reforming drug laws Home» Publications» Drug Policies in the State of Michigan Economic Effects» Drug Policies
Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department Inmate Services Bureau Education Based Incarceration Unit 1
Los Angeles County Sheriff s Department Inmate Services Bureau Education Based Incarceration Unit 1 M.E.R.I.T Program Maximizing Education Reaching Individual Transformation 2 Overview The MERIT program
Statistics on Women in the Justice System. January, 2014
Statistics on Women in the Justice System January, 2014 All material is available though the web site of the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS): http://www.bjs.gov/ unless otherwise cited. Note that correctional
Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide
Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide Updated January 2012 PREVENTION ASSESSMENT TREATMENT REINTEGRATION MUNICIPAL & COMMON PLEAS COURT GUIDE Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Municipal
Population, Alternatives to Incarceration and Budget Information
Population, Alternatives to Incarceration and Budget Information 500 Employees 1,300 Offenders under supervision Lafayette Parish Correctional Center (LPCC), Transitional Housing Facility Community Corrections
CUMULATIVE SECOND YEAR COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF PIMA COUNTY S DRUG TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE TO PRISON PROGRAM REPORT
CUMULATIVE SECOND YEAR COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF PIMA COUNTY S DRUG TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE TO PRISON PROGRAM REPORT Submitted to: Barbara LaWall Pima County Attorney and Melissa Rueschhoff, Esq. Program
Community Supervision Texas Association of Counties October 2015
10/26/2015 Community Supervision Texas Association of Counties October 2015 Presented by District Judge Todd Blomerth, 421 st Judicial District Court of Caldwell County 1 10/26/2015 2 10/26/2015 Your Possible
Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide
Hamilton County Municipal and Common Pleas Court Guide Updated July 2015 PREVENTION ASSESSMENT TREATMENT REINTEGRATION MUNICIPAL & COMMON PLEAS COURT GUIDE Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Municipal
SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS
SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS LISE MCKEAN, PH.D. SUSAN K. SHAPIRO CENTER FOR IMPACT RESEARCH OCTOBER 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT FUNDER Chicago
Commission on Criminal Justice and Sentencing Reform. Wednesday, June 3 rd, 2015 1:00pm to 5:00pm
Treatment Capacity in Illinois Commission on Criminal Justice and Sentencing Reform Wednesday, June 3 rd, 2015 1:00pm to 5:00pm Introduction What is the treatment capacity in Illinois? For mental health?
ATLANTIC JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DRUG COURT
ATLANTIC JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DRUG COURT History The Atlantic Judicial Circuit began exploring the possibility of a Drug Court in 2008 under the leadership of Superior Court Judge D. Jay Stewart. A planning
Drug Offender in Georgia Prisons 1. Drug Offenders in Georgia State Prisons. Bobbie Cates. Valdosta State University
Drug Offender in Georgia Prisons 1 Drug Offenders in Georgia State Prisons Bobbie Cates Valdosta State University Drug Offenders in Georgia Prisons 2 Abstract In this paper I am going to point on drug
Mental Illness, Addiction and the Whatcom County Jail
March 1, 015 Mental Illness, Addiction and the Whatcom County Jail Bill Elfo, Sheriff Whatcom County America is experiencing a disturbing and increasing trend in the number of offenders housed in its county
External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015
External Advisory Group Meeting June 2, 2015 1. There seems to be an extended wait from disposition to sentence where defendants are in jail awaiting the completion of the pre-sentence report. How many
Pierce County. Drug Court. Established September 2004
Pierce County Drug Court Established September 2004 Policies and Procedures Updated September 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Drug Court Team II. Mission Statement III. The Drug Court Model IV. Target Population
Mental Health & Addiction Forensics Treatment
Mental Health & Addiction Forensics Treatment Sheriffs: Help needed to cope with September 15, 2014 mentally ill INDIANAPOLIS - A sheriff says county jails have become the "insane asylums" for Indiana
ONDCP. Drug Policy Information Clearinghouse FACT SHEET John P. Walters, Director www.whitehousedrugpolicy.gov 1-800-666-3332
UNUM Executive Office of the President Office of National Drug Control Policy E PLURIBUS OFFICE OF NATIONAL POLICY D RUG CONTROL ONDCP March 2001 Drug Policy Information Clearinghouse FACT SHEET John P.
2007 Innovations Awards Program APPLICATION
2007 Innovations Awards Program APPLICATION CSG reserves the right to use or publish in other CSG products and services the information provided in this Innovations Awards Program Application. If your
Proposition 5. Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute.
Proposition 5 Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute. SUMMARY This measure (1) expands drug treatment diversion programs for criminal offenders, (2) modifies parole supervision
Stopping the Revolving Door for Mentally Ill Offenders in the Criminal Justice System via Diversion and Re-entry Programs
GEORGIA GEORGIA GEORGIA GEORGIA GEORGIA Department of Corrections ON THE MOVE Stopping the Revolving Door for Mentally Ill Offenders in the Criminal Justice System via Diversion and Re-entry Programs Academic
Community Based Corrections Substance Abuse Treatment For the Higher Risk Offender
CHESTER J. CULVER, GOVERNOR PATTY JUDGE, LT. GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS JOHN R. BALDWIN, DIRECTOR Iowa Department of Corrections Performance Audit Report Community Based Corrections Substance Abuse
Fairfax-Falls Church Community Services Board
LOB #267: ADULT RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT SERVICES Purpose Adult Residential Treatment Services provides residential treatment programs for adults with severe substance use disorders and/or co occurring mental
Michigan DUI Courts Outcome Evaluation
Michigan DUI Courts Outcome Evaluation Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Bay County Michigan Supreme Court State Court Administrative Office P.O. Box 30048 Lansing, MI 48909 www.courts.mi.gov Ottawa County
SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS AT THE CORRECTIONS CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIO
SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAMS AT THE CORRECTIONS CENTER OF NORTHWEST OHIO Appropriate treatment helps to prevent recidivism among offenders. This holds true at the Corrections Center of Northwest
Petrus UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research X (2007)
Fighting the Addiction: The Effectiveness of the La Crosse County Drug Court Program Erin R. Petrus Faculty Sponsor: William G. Zollweg, Department of Sociology/Archeology ABSTRACT The purpose of the research
Part I Improvements to Existing Programs
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Second Chance Act: Sec. 1. Short Title. Part I Improvements to Existing Programs This section names the short title of the act as the Second Chance Act of 2007: Community
The Nation s Number One Health Problem The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Substance Abuse The Nation s Number One Health Problem The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation A Health & Social Problem More Deaths Illnesses, and Disabilities than any other preventable health condition 1
STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE
STATE OF OKLAHOMA 1st Session of the 49th Legislature (2003) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE BILL 789 By: Wilkerson COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE [ corrections - judicial review - modifying when report is provided
Justice Reinvestment in New Hampshire
January 2010 Justice Reinvestment in New Hampshire Analyses & Policy Options to Reduce Spending on Corrections & Increase Public Safety Background IN JUNE 2009, GOVERNOR JOHN LYNCH, Supreme Court Chief
Drug Court as Diversion for Youthful Offenders
Drug Court as Diversion for Youthful Offenders Juvenile Drug Courts in Hawaii: A Policy Brief Introduction The problem of drug abuse among the general population in the United States began to escalate
FY 2015 Program Guide Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) for Prisoners
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services FY 2015 Program Guide Residential Substance Abuse Treatment (RSAT) for Prisoners Applications must be received by July 18, 2014 Virginia
All the Way Home: Re-entry and Housing. NAEH Conference July 13, 2005 Richard Cho [email protected]
All the Way Home: Re-entry and Housing NAEH Conference July 13, 2005 Richard Cho [email protected] Prison and Jail Re-entry Overview Approx. 2 million individuals are incarcerated in State and Federal
Chapter 938 of the Wisconsin statutes is entitled the Juvenile Justice Code.
Juvenile Justice in Wisconsin by Christina Carmichael Fiscal Analyst Wisconsin Chapter 938 of the Wisconsin statutes is entitled the Juvenile Justice Code. Statute 938.1 of the chapter states that it is
Opioid Treatment Programs at the Baltimore City Detention Center
Opioid Treatment Programs at the Baltimore City Detention Center Greg Warren, MA, MBA Director of Substance Abuse Services Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services OTP Interventions
SKAGIT COUNTY ADULT FELONY DRUG COURT
SKAGIT COUNTY ADULT FELONY DRUG COURT Recidivism and Cost Benefit Analysis October 2008 Prepared by: Sarah Hinman Substance Abuse Treatment Specialist Skagit County Human Services And David Asia, PhD Substance
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Justice-Involved Populations 1. Can Medicaid pay for any health care services provided within jails or prisons? No. Under the ACA (and prior to the ACA), no health care
STATE SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FOR ADULTS
Executive Summary STATE SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT FOR ADULTS Each year, Connecticut provides substance abuse treatment to thousands of adults with alcoholism and other drug addictions. Most are poor or
Department of Health Services. Alcohol and Other Drug Services Division
Department of Health Services Alcohol and Other Drug Services Division Summary of Programs and Services Rita Scardaci, MPH, Health Services Director Gino Giannavola, AODS Division Director Alcohol and
CORRELATES AND COSTS
ANOTHER LOOK AT MENTAL ILLNESS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE INVOLVEMENT IN TEXAS: CORRELATES AND COSTS Decision Support Unit Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Another Look at Mental Illness and Criminal
Drug Use, Testing, and Treatment in Jails By Doris James Wilson BJS Statistician
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Revised 9/29/00 Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report May 2000, NCJ 179999 Drug Use, Testing, and Treatment in Jails By Doris James Wilson BJS
Introduction & Guiding Principles p. 3. Guiding Principle 1: Acknowledge that gender makes a difference p. 3
1 Introduction & Guiding Principles p. 3 Guiding Principle 1: Acknowledge that gender makes a difference p. 3 Guiding Principle 2: Create an environment based on safety, respect, and dignity p. 4 Guiding
County of San Diego SB 618 Reentry Program. May 3, 2007
County of San Diego SB 618 Reentry Program May 3, 2007 1 California Recidivism - The Highest Return to Prison Rate in the Nation In FY 2006-07 it is estimated that San Diego County will convict over 16,000
RESIDENTIAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT (RSAT) FISCAL YEAR 2016 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
RESIDENTIAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT (RSAT) FISCAL YEAR 2016 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ONLY ONE AWARD WILL BE MADE UNDER THIS PROGRAM AREA FOR A JAIL-BASED RSAT PROGRAM. THE AWARD IS FOR ONE YEAR, RENEWABLE
ARIZONA CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION
ARIZONA CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PROGRAM For Assistance If you have questions about the grant instructions or the Grant Management
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE WHAT IS PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT? PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT Revises the definition of a felony
PROPOSAL. Expansion of Drug Treatment Diversion Programs. December 18, 2007
December 18, 2007 Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17 th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Ms. Krystal Paris Initiative Coordinator Dear Attorney General Brown: Pursuant
St. Croix County Drug Court Program. Participant Handbook
St. Croix County Drug Court Program Participant Handbook Updated: May 2014 To The St. Croix County Drug Court Program. This Handbook is designed to answer your questions and provide overall information
Jail Diversion & Behavioral Health
Jail Diversion & Behavioral Health Correctional Health Reentry Meeting Mandy Gilman, Director of Public Policy & Research Association for Behavioral Healthcare Association for Behavioral Healthcare Statewide
Special Report Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners, 1997
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report Substance Abuse and Treatment, and Prisoners, 1997 January 1999, NCJ 172871 By Christopher J. Mumola BJS
Evaluation of the Colorado Short Term Intensive Residential Remediation Treatment (STIRRT) Programs
Evaluation of the Colorado Short Term Intensive Residential Remediation Treatment (STIRRT) Programs Christine M. Shea Adams, Ph.D. Linda Harrison, M.S. Kim English, M.A. Colorado Division of Criminal Justice
Statewide Evaluation of 2003 Iowa Adult and Juvenile Drug Courts
Statewide Evaluation of 2003 Iowa Adult and Juvenile Drug Courts BJS/JRSA 2009 National Conference Michelle D. Cook Lanette Watson Paul Stageberg Iowa Department of Human Rights Division of Criminal and
Department of Corrections. Division of Community Corrections. Division of Operations. Pilot Jail Based Return to Custody & Offender Re-Entry Program 1
Department of Corrections Division of Community Corrections Division of Operations Pilot Jail Based Return to Custody & Offender Re-Entry Program 1 Objective: Development and implementation of a short-term
Cowlitz County Drug Court Evaluation
Cowlitz County Drug Court Evaluation Prepared by: Principal Investigator Mark Krause, Ph.D. Laurie Drapela, Ph.D. Consultants Research Assistants: Kate Wilson, Jillian Schrupp, Jen Haner Department of
FACT SHEET. Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency. Youth Under Age 18 in the Adult Criminal Justice System. Christopher Hartney
June 26 FACT SHEET Views from the National Council on Crime and Delinquency Youth Under Age 18 in the Adult Criminal Justice System Christopher Hartney Negative Impacts on Youth Processed in the Adult
How To Participate In A Drug Court
Program Handbook Cabell County Drug Court SCA Treatment Court Form 200 SR DCT Page 1 of 9 What is Drug Court? West Virginia s Cabell County Drug Court is a collaborative effort of legal, mental health,
Texas HOPE Literacy, Inc.
Mission Statement Texas HOPE Literacy, Inc. Texas HOPE Literacy is an existing initiative that has served as the leading volunteer peer-driven literacy program in Texas prisons. The Texas Department of
In many jurisdictions, state and local government
September 2012 States Report Reductions in Recidivism In many jurisdictions, state and local government officials have intensified their efforts to reduce recidivism. As policymakers are under tremendous
Los Angeles County Department of Health Services Alcohol and Drug Program Administration
Los Angeles County Department of Health Services Annual Review of Participants in Alcohol and Drug Programs Contracted by the 2003-04 Fiscal Year Prepared by Research and Evaluation Planning Division Los
Mercyhurst College Civic Institute. An Overview of the Erie County Criminal Justice System
Mercyhurst College Civic Institute An Overview of the Criminal Justice System January 2005 Erika Brown, Research Analyst Art Amann, Director Table of Contents Table of Contents...1 Introduction...2 Methodology...2
The Second Chance Act Frequently Asked Questions
The Second Chance Act Frequently Asked Questions What does the Second Chance Act do? The Second Chance Act primarily authorizes federal funding for state and federal reentry programs. It also directs but
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT: PERSPECTIVES FROM THE STATE Erin Sasse, Chief Office of External Affairs [email protected] (916) 445-4950 WHAT IS
2014 SYNC Review. Teton County Court Supervised Treatment Program, Jackson, WY
2014 SYNC Review Teton County Court Supervised Treatment Program, Jackson, WY Program Director: Anne Comeaux, 8.5 years in position Founded: 2004 SYNC Evaluation Date: February 5, 2014 Total Participants
Department of Community and Human Services Mental Health, Chemical Abuse and Dependency Services Division
Criminal Justice Initiative Community Center for Alternative Programs Intensive Outpatient Chemical Dependency Treatment Program Two Year Outcomes Subsequent to Program Changes Department of Community
