MATERIAL FACT SHEET BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS



Similar documents
GUIDELINES FOR THE REGISTRATION OF BIOLOGICAL PEST CONTROL AGENTS FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS

Integrated Pest Management

INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT

Fungal Entomopathogens: An Enigmatic Pest Control Alternative

Bt biopesticides. miracle, myth or marketing. The Informed Gardener by Linda Chalker-Scott

Integrated Pest Management

Pest Control Products Board Nairobi, Kenya PESTICIDE REGISTRATION IN KENYA - BIOPESTICIDES. by P. N. Ngaruiya (Dr)

What is a pest? How Insects Become Pests. How do insects become pests? Problems with Pesticides. What is most commonly used to control insect pests?

- A9/1 - Format for the listing of end points to be included in the Tier III overall summary and assessments

Formulation of bio-pesticides and mass culture of natural enemies for pest management. D. Ahangama

Insecticides for Organic Commercial & Backyard Vegetable Production Organic crop production is not pesticide free!

What is Integrated Pest Management?

Ch Pest Control. Outline

Genetically modified crops in Integrated Pest Management

IPM Plan for Campus Landscape

Chemical versus Biological Control of Sugarcane. By Abid Hussain Matiari Sugar Mills Ltd.

Introduction to the concepts of IPM

Tree Integrated Pest Management. Dan Nortman Virginia Cooperative Extension, York County

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Policy

AP ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE 2012 SCORING GUIDELINES

University of Hawaii at Manoa, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources

TESTIMONY OF DR. STEVEN BRADBURY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

The End of the World as we know it: The Environmental Costs of Genetic Engineering

3. Which relationship can correctly be inferred from the data presented in the graphs below?

Efficacy of Dual Gene Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cotton for Control of Bollworm, Helicoverpa Zea (Boddie)

HSA Consumer Guide. Understanding Vaccines, Vaccine Development and Production. November How a Vaccine Works.

Unit 4 Lesson 1: A Pest by Any Other Name

OSU Extension Service Master Gardener Program. Organic Pest Control. Weston Miller OSU Extension Service Community and Urban Horticulture faculty

Adoption of GE Crops by U.S. Farmers Increases Steadily

SAFE & EFFECTIVE USE OF ORGANIC PESTICIDES

Total Course Hours. Semester Degree code. ID Course Name Professor Course Content Summary st 11070

Pesticides for use on Mangoes

POWERFUL INSECT CONTROL IN GRAPES

Insect Management in the Home Vegetable Garden

Biopesticides Provide More Options Plus Customer Satisfaction for Produce Buyers and Retailers

Biological Larvicide. Water Soluble Pouch

POLICY REGARDING PEST MANAGEMENT ON CITY PROPERTY

Introduction to Integrated Pest Management. John C. Wise, Ph.D. Michigan State University MSU Trevor Nichols Research Complex

Hop Pest Control. H. E. Morrison. jpf^vrsiolnrru; - «ibntoj."' «- '',orto JUN 6 I-JJ3

Grasshopper and Bean Leaf Beetle

Integrated Pest Management

PEST IDENTIFICATION. PMA 4570/6228 Lab 1 July

PS Spinosad provides long-term protection for stored wheat

Information for Educators Page. Acknowledgments...4 About this Curriculum...5 National Science Education Standards...6

INSECT MANAGEMENT (Roberts & McPherson)

DOE Office of Biological & Environmental Research: Biofuels Strategic Plan

Broadscale use of pest-killing plants to be true test

Control of Insect Pests in Eucalypt Plantations

AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY: INSECT CONTROL BENEFITS

COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

BIOTECHNOLOGY Vol VIII - Crop Protection Through Pest-Resistant Genes - Stanley Freeman, Anges W. Mwang ombe

Maize 1507: toxic and inadequately tested

The US EPA s analysis of Bt crops finds that they pose no significant risk to the environment or to human health.

The Soil Food Web and Pest Management

Bacillus thuringiensis israelensis (Bti) in drinking-water. Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1. Tom Moriarty Office of Pesticide Programs U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Alternative Pesticide Management for the Lawn and Garden

WEST NILE VIRUS QUESTIONS ABOUT SPRAYING AND MOSQUITO CONTROL

Discover Entomology. Discover Entomology. A Science, a Career, a Lifetime. A Science, a Career, a Lifetime

Possible Commercial Formulations of Insect- Parasitic Nematodes *

IPM: from Integrated Pest Management to Intelligent Pest Management

Pests and Pest Control

Gene pyramiding as a Bt resistance management strategy: How sustainable is this strategy?

Integrated Pest Management

Management JBiopest 5(1): of 1-6 rice yellow stem borer, Scirpophaga incertulas Walker using some biorational insecticides

TOBACCO INSECT CONTROL Francis P. F. Reay-Jones, Extension Entomologist

This material is based on work supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Extension Service & the U.S. EPA

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Learning Objectives. What is Integrated Pest Management (IPM)? After studying this section, you should be able to:

Outline. What is IPM Principles of IPM Methods of Pest Management Economic Principles The Place of Pesticides in IPM

BENEFITS OF USING IPM

Upscaling of locally proven IPM technologies for control of pest of economic importance i

LOUISIANA RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONTROL OF PECAN INSECTS IN COMMERCIAL PECAN ORCHARDS: AN ILLUSTRATED GUIDE

Integrated Mosquito Management. Rosmarie Kelly Public Health Entomologist Georgia Dept of Public Health

Importance of Wildlife

Virginia Gardener

I. RECOMMENDED PRACTICES BASED ON GOOD AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES (GAP) AND GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES (GMP)

List of safe chemicals for use at community garden sites in Lee County, Florida

A Ros-E-IQ By Robert B. Martin Jr.

Use of Biotechnology in Agriculture Benefits and Risks

Gardening for Food & Fun 2014

Class Insecta - The insects

GUARANTEE: Bacillus thuringiensis, subspecies, kurstaki strain HD-1 (16 Billion International Units per kg).

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

If Your Farm Is Organic, Must It Be GMO-Free?

R.E.D. FACTS. Chloroxylenol. Pesticide Reregistration. Use Profile. Regulatory History

Enterprise Guide for Southern Maryland: Growing Broccoli

Alaska Forest Pest Control Supplemental Information. Category Twelve

1. When wall voids and dead spaces must be treated from small openings, the most effective formulation to use would be:

NATURE AND SCOPE OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL

Registration Decision. Sulfoxaflor

Transcription:

MATERIAL FACT SHEET BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS MATERIAL NAME: Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) MATERIAL TYPE: Microbial-derived U.S. EPA TOXICITY: Category: III, Caution USDA-NOP: considered nonsynthetic, allowed. Preventive, cultural, mechanical and physical methods must be first choice for pest control, and conditions for use of a biological material must be documented in the organic system plan (7CFR 205.206(e). MATERIAL DESCRIPTION: The active ingredients in Bt products are proteins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria. Some activity also occurs from the spores. Bt is a member of the genus Bacillus, a diverse group of spore forming bacteria that consists of more than 20 species. The species B. thuringiensis is common in terrestrial habitats, including soil, dead insects, granaries and on plants (AAM 2002). Bt has many subspecies that possess a variety of crystalline proteins with distinct insecticidal properties. Some subspecies work only against Lepidoptera (caterpillars), while others work against only Coleoptera (beetles) or the larvae of flies and mosquitoes (Diptera). It is important to match the subspecies of Bt with the insect type (Siegel 2000). The products allowed for certified organic production typically contain derivatives of bacterial cultures that include the protein active ingredient (endotoxin), spores, plus adjuvants such as wetting agents. HOW IT WORKS: Unlike many insecticides, Bt must be eaten by a susceptible insect in order to be effective. The microorganism produces both spores (resting stage) and a crystalline protein (an endotoxin). When eaten by the insect, this endotoxin becomes activated and binds to the insect gut creating a pore through which gut contents can enter the insect s body cavity and bloodstream. The insect ceases to feed and dies within a few days. ORGANIC RESOURCE GUIDE 69

B A C I L L U S T H U R I N G I E N S I S MATERIAL FACT SHEET APPLICATION GUIDELINES: There are dozens of Bt proteins, some of which are toxic to particular types of insects. Generally, the following guidelines can be used for commercial products: Bt kustaki: caterpillars Bt aizawai: caterpillars Bt tenebrionis (also called Bt san diego): beetle larvae Bt israelensis: fly larvae (including fungus gnats, blackflies, and mosquitoes) Not all species of caterpillars, beetles or flies are susceptible to the subspecies of Bt listed above (see efficacy section). The most important factor is using the right subspecies of Bt for the insect you wish to manage. Because Bt must be eaten by the insect to be effective, it is very important to apply the spray to the parts of the plant where and when the insect is feeding. Many insects feed on the undersides of leaves and in concealed parts of the plant, so thorough coverage is required. As with most insecticides, young larvae are generally more susceptible than older larvae so treatments should be timed accordingly. Early detection and application are crucial for good control. The spray deposit may only last a few days before it is broken down by sunlight. Additional ingredients such as stickers that promote adherence to leaf surfaces and UV light inhibitors that protect Bt from photo degradation may enhance efficacy. As with any natural or synthetic insecticide, insect populations can develop resistance to Bt, such has already occurred with some populations of Colorado potato beetle and diamondback moth (Tabashnik et al. 2003). In order to avoid development of resistance, only apply Bt when needed and use as part of an overall integrated pest management program that includes cultural and biological controls. If sprays are needed frequently, it is best to spray a single generation of the insects and then use another material or tactic for the next generation. This lessens the selection for resistance. REENTRY INTERVAL (REI) AND PRE-HARVEST INTERVAL (PHI): 4 hrs (12 hours for Bt tenebrionis). Exempt from tolerance on all raw commodities. AVAILABILITY AND SOURCES: There are currently over 100 Bt microbial insecticides registered in the US, but these are based on only 4 subspecies of Bt. Bt products are readily available in stores that sell agricultural products. Since not all Bt products are allowed for certified organic production because of prohibited inert ingredients or genetically engineered active ingredients, be sure to check with your certifier before use. 70 ORGANIC RESOURCE GUIDE

MATERIAL FACT SHEET B A C I L L U S T H U R I N G I E N S I S Bt products vary in their origin and manufacturing process. There are four major types of manufacturing: APPROVED TYPES The first Bt products, including many still available today, were made from naturally occurring wild type species of Bt (e.g. DiPel, Javelin, and XenTari ). Newer strains of Bts have been created through a process called conjugation or transconjugation. This phenomenon is known to occur in nature and is analogous to hybridization in higher organisms. Two or more subspecies of Bt are mixed together in a way that facilitates the formation of new strains from which individuals with desirable qualities from both parents may be selected. This method is permissible under the NOP definition of excluded methods (genetic engineering). Products that fall under this category include Condor and Cutlass (although these formulations are not OMRI listed). PROHIBITED TYPES Some products derived from wild types employ an encapsulated delivery system (Mattch, MVP II ) that uses genetic engineering and is therefore prohibited by the NOP definition of excluded methods. The intention of this encapsulation is to protect the Bt toxin from rapid environmental breakdown. In these products, a Pseudomonas species of bacteria is genetically modified to produce the Bt toxin. The Pseudomonas cells, which are carrying the Bt toxins, are then killed by ultraviolet light. This method is prohibited for organic production. The newest form of Bt manufacturing is through recombinant DNA (rdna) techniques where specific genes linked to the expression (production) of crystalline protein toxins are inserted into bacterial cells. Novel combinations of toxins are the result of this process. This method of Bt manufacturing is not acceptable in organic production systems. Products formulated with prohibited solvents or other EPA List 3 inert ingredients are not allowed for organic production. For instance, at the date of this publication, there are no OMRI approved Bt tenebrionis based products available for the management of Colorado potato beetle. In addition to manufactured products, Bt genes for the expression of crystalline protein have also been inserted directly into crops by rdna techniques. Bt corn and cotton are grown widely in the US, China, Australia, India and to a lesser extent in about a dozen other countries. Such genetically engineered crops are not permitted in organic production systems. OMRI LISTED PRODUCTS: Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. aizawai Able (Certis USA) Agree WG (Green Line) (Certis USA) XenTari DF (Valent BioSciences Corp) - wild type XenTari WDG (Valent BioSciences Corp) - wild type ORGANIC RESOURCE GUIDE 71

B A C I L L U S T H U R I N G I E N S I S MATERIAL FACT SHEET Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Deliver (Green Line) (Certis USA) Biobit HP (Valent BioSciences Corp) Britz Bt Dust (Britz Fertilizers Inc) DiPel 2X (Valent BioSciences Corp) - wild type DiPel DF (Valent BioSciences Corp) - wild type Javelin WG (Green Line) (Certis USA) - wild type Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis Gnatrol WDG (Valent BioSciences Corp) VectoBac WDG (Valent BioSciences Corp) GENETICALLY MODIFIED PRODUCTS (EXCLUDED FROM ORGANIC USE): Mattch, M-Trak (cancelled), MVP II Encapsulated delivery EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT: Wildlife: As part of the testing procedures for registration, Bt products were fed to birds and fish and the results have indicated no adverse effects. Natural enemies: Parasites and predators, important natural enemies of many insect pests, are generally not harmed directly by sprays or deposits of Bt. However, the loss of hosts may indirectly impact natural enemy populations. Other non-targets: Other susceptible hosts that are not the target of the spray may also be killed. These may include rare moths and butterflies in certain sensitive habitats, but impact is likely to be minimal with carefully targeted applications. For a more detailed summary of environmental studies of Bt, see Siegel (2000). EFFECTS ON HUMAN HEALTH: Because an insect s gut structure and physiology is vastly different from that of humans, Bt does not have the same effect on the human gut. The rapid break down by solar radiation results in little or no residues on crops. There have been very isolated reports of Bt being found in human tissues, but these appear to be secondary infections. Caution should be exercised in protecting eyes and open wounds when spraying Bt. A very small percentage of the human population is susceptible to allergic responses from exposure to Bt in relatively high doses (Bernstein et al. 1999). VEGETABLE EFFICACY TRIALS SUMMARY: OMRI-approved Bt products have very similar efficacy results to the entire array of Bt products, except that currently there are no approved formulations effective against Colorado potato beetle. Approved Bt products are generally effective against most lepidopteran species affecting brassicas and tomatoes. They can also be effective against the European corn borer on corn but, because it is difficult to deliver the product to the site of feeding they have not been as effective against corn earworm caterpillars. However, recent trials with the Zea-later, which is a hand-held device that 72 ORGANIC RESOURCE GUIDE

MATERIAL FACT SHEET B A C I L L U S T H U R I N G I E N S I S squirts a measured amount of material into the silk channel, have proved very promising (Hazzard and Westgate 2004). Bt formulations for caterpillar pests have little effect on other types of insects such as beetles or aphids. While no recent studies tested Bts against European corn borer on peppers, properly timed applications of Bt products could be effective in this situation. Approved products with either Bt aizawai or Bt kurstaki strains have performed similarly against caterpillars in recent studies. A database of recent university trials of Bt products was compiled for this fact sheet. These university-based trials typically test products with untreated buffer rows and other conditions that create unusually severe pest pressure. The level of pest control is likely to be higher on fields in which a good program of cultural controls has been implemented. In the table below, good control means statistically significant reductions in pest numbers or damage of 75% or more, compared to an untreated control. Fair control includes those with significant reductions of 50-74%, and any non-significant reductions of over 50%. The poor control group includes any results with less than 50% reduction. EFFICACY OF OMRI-LISTED BT PRODUCTS ORGANIC RESOURCE GUIDE 73

B A C I L L U S T H U R I N G I E N S I S MATERIAL FACT SHEET REFERENCES American Academy of Microbiology. 2002. 100 years of Bacillus thuringiensis: a critical scientific assessment. http://www.asm.org Bernstein I. L, J. A. Bernstein, M. Miller, S. Tierzieva, D. I. Bernstein, Z. Lummus, M. K. Selgrade, D. L. Doerfler and V. L. Seligy. 1999. Immune responses in farm workers after exposure to Bacillus thuringiensis pesticides. Environmental Health Perspectives 107:575-582. Hazzard, R. and P. Westgate. 2004. Organic Insect Control in Sweet Corn. Available through the UMass Extension bookstore at (413-545-5538; or www.umassextension.org/merchant2/merchant.mv). Also available at: http://www.umassvegetable.org/soil_crop_pest_mgt/specific_crops/swee t_corn/pdf_files/corn_fact_sheet.pdf Siegel J. P. 2000. Bacteria. Lacey L. L, Kaya H. K, eds. pp. 209--30. Field Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology. Kluwer Academic Pub., Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Tabashnik, B. E., Y. Carriere, T. J. Dennehy, S. Morin, M.S. Sisterson, R. T. Roush, A. M. Shelton and J. Z. Zhao. 2003. Insect resistance to transgenic Bt crops: lesson from the laboratory and field. J. Econ. Entomol. 96:1031-1038. 74 ORGANIC RESOURCE GUIDE