ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT IN LENDING



Similar documents
Sustainable Finance: Implications of Equator Principles 3.0 for Financiers and Developers

REPORTING ON EQUATOR PRINCIPLES IMPLEMENTATION

Goldman Sachs Environmental Policy Framework

./01&2/M./T34 1MP36T ST3T.M./T. 1a$t3l$4 536e-al4 13$ %3te9. Sol9ara 1 Pro;ect. !"l$%e ( Mai$ &e(ort. Te-t. )e*te%,e- 2//0 :; <//0=>=?

12 ENERGY Introduction

The Terms of reference (ToR) for conducting Rapid EIA study for the proposed project is described below:

MORGAN STANLEY ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY STATEMENT

CHAPTER 24: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

GUIDELINES ON ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONSIDERATIONS

TERMS OF REFERENCE. for an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT. for a PROPOSED RESORT DEVELOPMENT

PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE

International Finance Corporation. Environmental Risk Management in Lending and Investment

Sec. 22a-1a page 1 (4-97)

The Role of the Lender Common Infrastructure Design and Scoping Issues ESIA: The Management Planning Process Case Study Cross Cutting Themes:

THE EQUATOR PRINCIPLES JUNE 2013

THE NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT ORDINANCE (CAP LAWS OF SARAWAK, 1958 Ed.)

Chapter Five: Respect for Human Rights in Joint Ventures Relationships

Business Principles September 2014

This is a summarised version of 3i s full policy. Responsible Investment policy APRIL 2014

13 ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

Summary of Credit Suisse s Sector Policies and Guidelines

1. What is a biodiversity offset?

CLIMATE ACTION IN BRITISH COLUMBIA 2014 PROGRESS REPORT

EBRD s Environmental & Social (E&S) Risk Management Procedures for Mortgage Lending

How To Conduct An Environmental Impact Assessment

ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS

Amherst County Public Schools. AP Environmental Science Curriculum Pacing Guide. College Board AP Environmental Science Site

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS

Regarding: Request for Inspection, the Development Forest Sector Management Project (Liberia)

Proposed Terms of Reference for EIA studies

Northern Territory Fisheries Resource Sharing Framework

State of Qatar. Ministry of Environment. Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs) Report. November 19 th, 2015

How To Be Sustainable With Tourism

Revising the Nantahala and Pisgah Land Management Plan Preliminary Need to Change the Existing Land Management Plan

DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY DRAFT REVISED NATIONAL FOREST POLICY OF MALAWI

Forest-Climate Working Group:

Long Term Challenges for Tidal Estuaries

Policy & Management Applications of Blue Carbon. fact SHEET

How To Write A New Bill On Flood Management In Scotland

Institutional investors expectations of corporate climate risk management

NAPA COUNTY WATERSHED SYMPOSIUM

Aiding the Hydro-scheme development process. Web-links to useful information sources

APPENDIX 4. Risk Tables

Environmental Assessment

Oregon Territorial Sea Plan

Improving natural capital reporting and finding the tools to help

Explanatory Memorandum to the Conservation of Habitats and Species (Amendment) Regulations 2012

ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING REGIME: REGIONALITY IN THE FOREGROUND

SFI INC. LAUNCHES NEW STANDARD LEADS FOREST CERTIFICATION FORWARD

Australian Government Response to the Senate Committee on Finance and Public Administration

NEWMONT GHANA GOLD LTD. AHAFO SOUTH PROJECT COMPLETION AUDIT TERMS OF REFERENCE ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH, AND SAFETY

TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR THE RAPID EIA STUDY

Barents Euro Arctic Council. Seventh Meeting of Environment Ministers

Environmental and Social Management System. Environmental Risk Management for the Financial Sector

Chapter 8. List of Preparers

Green Infrastructure Case Study Template

Co-creation progress update and an invitation to respond. Overview of ideas from co-creation activities towards a Climate Ready UK...

S.B.S. Resolution Nº The Head of the Superintendency of Banks, Insurance Companies and Private Pension Fund Administrators

Introduction to protection goals, ecosystem services and roles of risk management and risk assessment. Lorraine Maltby

United States-Peru Environmental Cooperation Work Program

CSBI TIMELINE TOOL A TOOL FOR ALIGNING TIMELINES FOR PROJECT EXECUTION, BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT AND FINANCING CROSS- SECTOR BIODIVERSITY INITIATIVE

Living & Working Managing Natural Resources and Waste

2. determining that land is not contaminated land and is suitable for any use, and hence can be removed from the CLR or EMR, as relevant.

World Tourism Organization RECOMMENDATIONS TO GOVERNMENTS FOR SUPPORTING AND/OR ESTABLISHING NATIONAL CERTIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM

Oil Sands Environmental Coalition

LIFE ORIENTATION DOCUMENT

Guidance for the financial sector: Scope 3 accounting and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions. Summary of Scoping Workshop

7th Framework Programme Theme 6 Environment (including climate change)

Construction CONSTRUCTION

A Guide to Woodland Carbon for Business

NAPCS Product List for NAICS 54162: Environmental Consulting Services

The Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive: Guidance for Planning Authorities

Avison Management Services Ltd. COMPANY PROFILE

1. Purpose and scope. 2. SEPA's role in hydropower and planning

Making the polluter pay Environmental Damage Regulations March 2009

Helical Bar - Environmental Management System. January 2014

Proposal for a RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Department of the Interior. Departmental Manual

INVESTMENT CODE. as appropriate, minimise adverse impacts and enhance positive effects on the environment, workers, and all stakeholders;

Natural Capital at Risk

Environmental management framework 24

Terms of Reference For First Joint Mission for the Pilot Programme on Climate Resilience (PPCR) In St. Vincent and the Grenadines

Standard 14: produce a long-term financial plan to support strategy and measures, implementation, further data development, and analyses.

Darryl Anderson PROJECT MANAGEMENT Harbour Authority Associa9on of Bri9sh Columbia March 6, 2014

CRÉDIT AGRICOLE CIB GREEN NOTES

Welsh Government. Practice Guide. Realising the potential of pre-application discussions

Preparing a Green Wedge Management Plan

>> BRIEFING TO THE INCOMING MINISTERS

SR 89/Fanny Bridge Community Revitalization Project. Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Impact Statement/ Environmental Assessment

THE PROVISIONAL CENTRAL PRODUCT CLASSIFICATION

APPENDIX 2A. Shah Deniz Production Sharing Agreement Extract

Approved by Management Committee 24/03/11 Strategy Document

FOUR RIVERS RESTORATION PROJECT

Social impact assessment. Guideline to preparing a social impact management plan

Panel Remarks by Mr Mmboneni Muofhe, GEO Principal Alternate, Deputy Director General, Department of Science and Technology, South Africa

EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT

Sustainable Tourism Management - an overview -

THE ECONOMIC DATA BASE AN INSTRUMENT SUPPORTING PREPARATION OF THE PROGRAMMES OF MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE

COUNTY OF LAMBTON OFFICIAL PLAN UPDATE BACKGROUND REPORT NO.

Transcription:

ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT IN LENDING Barclays has a strong and longstanding commitment to managing the environmental and social risks associated with commercial lending. We recognise that a bank s major environmental impacts tend to be indirect, arising from the provision of financial services to business customers operating in sensitive sectors. We also believe that taking due account of our environmental and social impacts is not only the right thing to do, but also makes good business sense. Environmental and Social Risks Assessment Process Environmental and Social Risk Structure There are established lines of communication between Barclays lending managers, the credit teams, and the central Environmental and Social Risk Policy team and our Reputation Committee. Initially, the lending manager will liaise with the credit teams and, if a proposed transaction is judged to have material environmental or social sensitivities, guidance can be obtained from the central Environmental and Social Risk Management Team. Further escalation to the Reputation Committee is recommended in cases where the sensitivities are likely to remain significant. Environmental and Social Risk Management Team This is a dedicated team advising on complex transactions where there are environmental and/or social sensitivities. Based in London, it is supported by a network of Environmental Champions across the world tasked with the dissemination of information, raising environmental and social risk awareness, providing guidance, as well as acting as a referral point in their regions. The Team advises on all types of transactions, in all environmentally sensitive sectors globally. Reputation Committee Barclays Group Reputation Committee considers and investigates issues that may impact on Barclays' reputation or brand value. It supports a consistent, organisation-wide approach to reputation risk management, in accordance with the bank s Reputation Risk Framework, Purpose and Values, and can require action to be taken by the business to mitigate risk, eg: where a decision or situation is judged to be out of keeping with policy or our ways of working. The Reputation Committee reports to the Barclays Conduct and Reputation Risk Committee and members include senior business representatives and heads of key central support areas. Implementation of the Equator Principles into Barclays Policy for project finance In 1997, Barclays adopted and implemented a lending policy structuring our consideration of environmental issues into project finance transactions. This has evolved into our current Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Policy, which is designed to ensure that project related financing is rigorously assessed to identify, quantify and, where appropriate, mitigate and monitor environmental and social risks. Equator Principles The ESIA Policy is the mechanism by which Barclays applies the Equator Principles (EPs); a voluntary framework to manage the environmental and social risks in project related financing.

Barclays was one of four banks to collaborate with the International Finance Corporation (IFC), part of the World Bank, in drafting the EPs, which are based on internationally recognised IFC standards. The EPs were launched in June 2003 and formally adopted at that time by Barclays and nine other banks. The number of adopting financial organisations had risen to over 70 as at June 2014. The Equator Principles were re-drafted in June 2013 to adopt the new IFC Performance Standards. The Equator Principles apply globally and to all sectors in the following ways: The Principles apply to all project financing with capital costs above USD 10 million. The Principles now also apply to project finance advisory activities; corporate loans where there is a known use of proceeds; and bridge loans that are expected to be refinanced by project finance. The revised Principles now specifically cover upgrades or expansions of existing projects where additional environmental or social impacts are significant. There is a streamlined approach for projects located in countries with existing high standards for environmental and social issues. The Principles now contain an explicit commitment to respect human rights in due diligence processes and enhanced due diligence relating to climate change impacts, including alternatives analysis and revised carbon reporting. There are stronger social and environmental standards, including more robust public consultation standards, including FPIC for Indigenous Peoples. Each EPFI is required to report on the progress and performance of Equator Principles implementation on an annual basis, including disclosing, to the Equator Principle Association, the Equator deals in which they have participated. The Equator Principles have prompted other sectors besides banking to take account of Equator-related criteria, e.g. law firms, environmental consultants and construction/engineering companies, all of which are associated with aspects of project development. This ripple effect has broadened awareness of the environmental and social implications of projects and the need to manage these effectively if access to the maximum number of potential financiers is to be achieved. For further information on this initiative see the Equator Principles website. Scope of Barclays Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Policy (ESIA) The Barclays ESIA Policy covers our business worldwide when considering financing, advising or other roles related to projects, and applies in the following circumstances: Where there is a legal requirement for an environmental and social impact assessment, and/or Where Equator Principles apply, and/or Where there is a known application of funds to a potentially sensitive project. There is no minimum financial threshold for the application of Barclays ESIA policy. Policy Process Project Assessment Barclays requires an ESIA to be undertaken for all transactions that fall within the scope of our ESIA Policy. This must comply with Barclays minimum requirements for an ESIA and be undertaken by an independent consultant that appears on our preferred panel. If an ESIA has already been undertaken in connection with the relevant project, but does not meet the above requirements, then Barclays may require a second opinion of the ESIA be

commissioned and undertaken by an independent consultant that appears on our preferred panel, in accordance with our minimum requirements for a second opinion of an ESIA. Our aim is to ensure we have access to an objective, comprehensive and professional report on the environmental and social risks associated with the project. Post ESIA process The independent consultant will confirm whether the project currently meets the requirements of our ESIA policy and the Equator Principles. They are required to highlight areas where full compliance is not clear, alongside recommended actions that will need to be taken in order for the project to work towards compliance. The consultant is also expected to provide guidance on the associated costs and timescales. Barclays will then work with the consultants and our client (the borrower) to understand whether the recommended actions to attain Equator compliance are achievable in the project and commercial context. If this is so, the actions will be incorporated into an Environmental and Social Action Plan. The implementation and monitoring of such plans is covenanted in the loan documentation i.e. it becomes a condition of the loan agreement. If we feel that that the required action may prove too challenging to implement, or the client is unwilling to proceed, we will decline to participate in the project. However, as a general rule, we prefer to collaborate to improve project standards rather than simply step aside to allow a potentially less environmentally or socially inclined financial institution to support the transaction. Barclays Minimum Requirements for an ESIA Barclays sets out a minimum scope for an ESIA and has a separate scope for a second opinion of an existing ESIA. These contain details of our requirements in relation to aims, data collection and assessment, baseline assessment, treatment of subcontractors, risk assessment, monitoring/mitigation plan, environmental and social management, and training and reporting. The scope includes a review of the following (as relevant): An assessment of the project against the IFC Policies and World Bank Guidelines as prescribed by the Equator Principles. An assessment of the financial impact on the project of applicable, currently foreseeable and reasonably anticipated environmental legislation (both national and international) relevant to the proposed scheme. The level and adequacy of public consultation. This should include details of: o public meetings/hearings and attendance, o press releases; a list of questions asked and the project responses to these; o notifications/consultation with the principal community/interest groups, o timing of consultation and whether it would constitute prior, informed consultation. A review of material relating to the assessment of project alternatives Commentary on whether the proposed standards are considered appropriate and to what degree the project design incorporates scope for improvement or upgrading to meet higher standards which may be imposed upon the project sponsor in the future. Confirmation the project is working to recognised best practice, (e.g. the World Commission on Dams guidelines, the Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development Project). Commentary on current and reasonably foreseeable government policies which may affect this sector, including sector-specific policies, e.g. forestry, water infrastructure, which are proposed/supported by internationally recognised non-governmental organisations

The materiality of impacts should reflect relevant assumptions on shifts in weather patterns affecting the project site, and the impact of the project on GHG emissions. Physical resources - landscape, topography, soils, air quality and climate (including global warming/kyoto Protocol), surface water, ground water, geology/seismology. Ecological resources - flora, fauna, habitats and species, fisheries, aquatic biology, wildlife, forests, rare/endangered species, wilderness or protected areas. Marine issues bathymetry, currents, waves, tides, sediment transfer, sea level rise, marine water quality, sediment quality, marine archaeology. Human and economic development - including, but not necessarily limited to, population and communities (numbers, locations, composition, resource dependency, employment); industries; infrastructural facilities (including water supply, sewage, flood control, drainage); transportation (roads, harbours, airports, navigation) and traffic (particularly during construction); land use planning (including dedicated area uses); power sources and transmission; agricultural development; mineral development; tourism resources. Quality of life values - including, but not necessarily limited to, socio-economic values; public health; noise disturbance; recreational resources and development; aesthetic values; archaeological or historical treasures; cultural values. Policy Governance Barclays ESIA Policy has been in existence since 1997 and is reviewed on an annual basis to ensure it remains fit for purpose, user friendly and value adding. The policy is owned by the Group Credit Risk Director and managed by the Environmental Risk Team. Preferred independent consultants Barclays has a panel of preferred independent consultants for undertaking ESIA reviews. The panel consists of consultants who have been selected on a global basis for their environmental and social risk expertise, industry and geographical strengths and experience of working with financial institutions. The consultants ongoing suitability is assessed on a regular basis. To support the implementation of Barclays ESIA Policy, the process is fully documented with a policy statement, process document, a categorisation tool, ESIA scoping documents, and the topical record of preferred consultants. These documents are available to all our employees electronically. Additional Environmental Risk Review outside of project finance In addition to the referral process described above, all clients operating in environmentally sensitive sectors and which are subject to sanction by Barclays Group Credit Committee, are referred to the Environmental and Social Risk Policy team for assessment (every two years as a minimum). This ensures that banking relationships, in addition to particular lending transactions, are included in the risk assessment process. The environmental Risk team also advises on a wide range of banking products for clients that operate in environmentally or socially sensitive sectors, such as corporate loans, trading facilities, and bonds. Environmental and Social Risk Training As part of Barclays ongoing commitment to sustainability, we continue to focus on raising the awareness of environmental and social risk issues among employees across our global operations. Training frontline employees helps us ensure environmental and social risks are considered alongside more traditional business risks when lending decisions are made.

Industry Specific Guidance Our industry specific risk guidance covers over 50 environmentally and socially sensitive sectors, which span 10 broad industry headings. The content of these guidance notes has been considerably expanded to include an overview of each industry s regulatory situation, and guidance about the sort of measures we would expect companies in that sector to be taking to identify their risks and implement the appropriate actions and controls. For example, an issue that may not be immediately obvious with health care companies is the disposal of surgical waste. The revised guidance also places far greater emphasis on aspects of social issues and human rights an area of increasing concern for the NGO community. The guidance is updated on an annual basis. This guidance 1 now covers the following sectors, and a number of sub-sectors within them: Agriculture and fisheries Metals and mining Oil and gas Power generation, supply and distribution Chemicals, pharmaceuticals manufacturing and bulk storage General Manufacturing Utilities and waste management Infrastructure Service industry Forestry and logging 1 *Our sectoral guidance notes are available on request from citizenship@barclays.com