PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN MASTER PLAN



Similar documents
FOR SALE. The Friedman Building th Avenue South, Seattle Nicholas T. Gill Allan Friedman

CITY COUNCIL / PLANNING COMMISSION JOINT STUDY SESSION AGENDA REPORT

STAFF REPORT. December 20, North District Community Council. Director of Community Planning - North

TOWN OF CARY CONDITIONAL USE ZONING PERMIT. 412 Rutherglen Cary, NC Rutherglen Cary, NC

CITY COUNCIL PACKET MEMORANDUM

THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CA M E M O R A N D U M DATE: AUGUST 21, 2008 CR6990

Appendix N: Bicycle Parking Ordinance

METROPOLITAN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN II OLD ALBUQUERQUE HIGH SCHOOL

Los Angeles Union Station, CA Sustainable Neighborhood Assessment. April 22-23, 2014

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Meeting Date: February 6, 2014 Zoning Board of Appeals Case No. 3302

WESTFIELD-WASHINGTON ADVISORY PLAN COMMISSION December 7, SPP-24 & 1512-ODP-24

Churches and Schools Development Standards

d. Building permits may only be approved if consistent with the approved development plan and land division for all units with common walls.

Executive Director s Recommendation Commission Meeting: March 5, 2015

28.0 Development Permit Area #2 (Neighbourhood District)

Brookdale Site. CB6 Update April 1, 2015

VISION, DESIGN PRINCIPLES & OVERALL PLANNING STRATEGY

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: August 20, 2013 Planning Board Case No. 1564C

The Lancaster Medical District Master Plan. The Lancaster Campus District 1

Prepared by: Samuel Dennis Date prepared: December 21, 2011

23 Glen Watford Drive - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT February 23, Summary. Background Information PREPARED FOR THE PLAN COMMISSION. Legistar File ID # 36810

The Council of the City of New York. Economic Development Corporation

REQUEST FOR RESPONSE

Community Plan BRENTWOOD-PACIFIC PALISADES TABLE OF CONTENTS ACTIVITY LOG COMMUNITY MAPS COMMUNITY PLAN

Minor Accommodation Planning Review Application

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: September 24, 2012 Planning Board Case No. 1248Q

# U N I V E R S I T Y A V E N U E S P E C I F I C P L A N Page 1-1 # 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.1 University Avenue, Historical Context

Residential Market. Downtown Houston

Arizona State University & City of Phoenix Partnership: Creating a Downtown Campus

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY. Staff: Claudette Grant

FILING REQUIREMENTS EXCERPTS FROM THE ZONING ORDINANCE SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS

Appendix C Related Studies

BASSETT CREEK VALLEY MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE

Scenario Planning Report. Austin South Shore Central

Downtown Core Sub-district

CPED STAFF REPORT Prepared for the City Planning Commission

NOTICE OF A TYPE II DECISION ON A PROPOSAL IN YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD

ELEMENT 4 - FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

CITY OF SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS MAYOR S OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

DEVLOPMENT APPLICATION PROCEDURES

Proposed Planning Incentives to Support the Replacement of Office Space in New Mixed Use Developments Draft Zoning By-law Amendments

APPENDIX F RIGHTS-OF-WAY PRESERVATION GUIDELINES

Chapter 7 ZONING PLAN

3 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing

Fast Track A Successful Redevelopment: The Palm Beach Outlets Story

Industrial Suburban District Regulations City of St. Petersburg City Code Chapter 16, Land Development Regulations

CITY OF SANTA ROSA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 2012 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER CUP12-042

DRAFT Policy to Guide Discretion on Proposed Relaxations to Minimum Parking Requirements in Commercial Districts City-Wide 2014 June 05

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: 1 DISCUSSION ITEM

Case Request: Rezone from (A) Agricultural District and (RA) Single Family Residential District to (RB) Two Unit Residential District

Planning Commission Staff Report

FILE NO.: Z-6915-C. Gamble Road Short-form PCD and Land Alteration Variance Request

TOWN OF DAVIE TOWN COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

City of Colleyville Community Development Department. Site/Landscape Plan Application Packet

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 9, 2015

CITY OF SOMERVILLE, MASSACHUSETTS MAYOR S OFFICE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

BLOCK 400 PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT

Revere Beach Transit-Oriented Development Parcels Revere, Massachusetts. Design and Development Guidelines. Part Two.

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 23, 2015

ISSUE BRIEF. Understanding the Hospital Planning, Design, and Construction Process. Introduction. Background. Phase 1: Project Definition and Planning

2010 Salida Community Priorities Survey Summary Results

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. in this chapter. 8.1 Overview of Economic Conditions. 8.2 Priority Economic Development Needs

01/31/13 ACHIEVING THE VISION FOR RESTON. Reston Master Plan Special Study Task Force

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LOMPOC AREA

Downtown Community Planning Council Meeting offebruary 18, 2015

Incentives for Historic Preservation

Request for Proposal East Tower Nursing Unit and Infrastructure Upgrade Grossmont Hospital

Financial Analysis for the Ambleside Centre Zoning Districts

SEEKING COMPLETENESS WAIVERS AND PRELIMINARY & FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL

1. Land Use. Chapter 1: Land Use 1-1 Adopted 10/2/09 Amended 3/22/11, 8/16/11

THE VIRGINIA SHOW BUILDING Request for Proposals Virginia Avenue St. Louis, Missouri 63111

Effect on structures. Uniform settlement - no concerns. Angular distortion - causes damage due to tensile strain

INTRODUCTION TO ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Land Use and Zoning. Land Use Within the Port Madison Indian Reservation

HARRIS TEETER AT LADY S ISLAND CITY OF BEAUFORT DRB CONCEPTUAL PROJECT NARRATIVE Submittal Date: September 2, 2015 Meeting Date: September 10, 2015

TOPIC: The Universities at Shady Grove: Facilities Master Plan Update. DATE OF COMMITTEE MEETING: October 17, 2013 (presentation and information)

AMENDED OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, VILLAGE DOCKLANDS PRECINCT, 2-46 BATMANS HILL DRIVE, DOCKLANDS

Assisted Living & Memory Care

Zoning Most Frequently Asked Questions

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, NEIGHBORHOODS, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M

Historic Tax Incentive For

Special Planning. What is a. What does an SPP affect?

CITY OF WOODBURY ORDINANCE NO. 1803

PRELIMINARY PROJECT REVIEW PROCESS

Transcription:

TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Planning & Community Development Department PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW OF ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN MASTER PLAN RECOMMENDATION: This report is for information only, no City Council action is required. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This report provides information to the City Council on a Pre-Development Plan Review (PPR) submitted for the Art Center College of Design 1 0-year Master Plan. The vision for the Master Plan is to focus growth in the South Campus where the college has recently acquired three new parcels, while upgrading existing facilities at the Hillside Campus. BACKGROUND: Art Center College of Design (Art Center) is a university which offers undergraduate and graduate programs in a wide variety of art and design fields, including advertising, film, and photography. It was first established in 1930 in Los Angeles and moved to the current Hillside Campus location at 1700 Lida Street in 1976. In July 1989, the City of Pasadena Board of Directors approved a five-year Master Plan for Art Center's Hillside Campus. The Master Plan allowed for a 47,472 square foot expansion to the existing campus, 200 new parking spaces and a maximum enrollment capacity of 1,500 students, but with no more than 1,250 students in attendance on campus at any one time. Thereafter, two Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) were approved, both in 2000, for minor additions to the Hillside Campus. CUP #3749 covered the construction of a 5,000 square foot, 2-story pavilion and CUP #3821 allowed a modular building to be placed in a parking lot to be temporarily used for classroom/workshop space. 06/08/2015 18

Page 2 of 6 In 2004, Art Center opened its first South Campus location at 950 S. Raymond. In January 2006, the City Council approved a 1 0-year Master Plan for South Campus that focused on student housing uses. The South Campus Master Plan consisted of two parcels at 950 and 988 S. Raymond Avenue and allowed for a new student housing facility with 152 units, 228 beds and three levels of underground parking. There was no maximum enrollment capacity established as part of the 2006 Art Center South Campus Master Plan. In 2012, Art Center began operating a shuttle system to connect the Hillside and South Campuses which were increasingly becoming interconnected campuses despite their distance. More recently, Art Center acquired three parcels adjacent to the existing South Campus and obtained permits for additional work to the South Campus parcels. In 2013, CUP #6040 was approved for the alteration and adaptive re-use of an existing two-story former postal service building and parking lot at 870 S. Raymond Avenue and 888 S. Raymond Avenue, respectively, both to be used by Art Center. In 2014, Art Center acquired another parcel at 1111 S. Arroyo Parkway in order to further expand its South Campus operations. Art Center then submitted a PPR for a new 1 0-year Master Plan which comprehensively identifies a vision for both the Hillside and South campuses. The proposed Master Plan focuses growth on the South Campus while making infrastructure upgrades to the Hillside Campus. MASTER PLAN PROCESS The purpose of a Master Plan as established in Pasadena Municipal Code Section 17.61.050 is to reduce processing time and uncertainty by consolidating several Conditional Use Permit hearings over an extended period of time and to ensure orderly and thorough City review of expansion plans for certain public, semi-public, and open space uses, resulting in more compatible and desirable development. The City Council is the decision-making body for the Master Plan, however, the Design and Planning Commissions will assume an advisory role and make recommendations to the City Council. As the South Campus has grown and operations have shifted to this Campus over time, the interrelationship between the two campuses has become increasingly connected. The applicant will be submitting one Master Plan application that encompasses development on both the Hillside and South Campus. A PPR is required for all Master Plan applications. The PPR process was established to achieve better projects through early consultation between City staff and applicants, to identify issues that may arise during application processing such as community concerns, to achieve consistency with City regulations and policies, and to avoid significant investment in the design of a project without preliminary direction from City staff. Importantly, the PPR process also serves to inform the City Council and the public of development projects that are of community-wide significance. This presentation is an informational item only and is not intended to be used for the purpose of discussing the merits of the proposed project.

Page 3 of 6 LOCATION: Hillside Campus: Art Center Hillside Campus is located in the San Rafael Hills, above the City's Rose Bowl Stadium. It encompasses approximately 175 acres, 33 acres of which have been developed with the remaining 142 acres set aside as natural open space. The Hillside Campus is generally bounded by Lida Street to the north, Rutherford Drive to the south, Glendale City limits to the west and Chamberlain Road to the east. South Campus: Art Center South Campus consists of five parcels: 870, 888, 950, 988 South Raymond Avenue and 1111 South Arroyo Parkway. It encompasses approximately 6.5 acres. The South Campus is generally bounded by South Arroyo Parkway to the west, South Raymond Avenue to the east and Glenarm Street to the south. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The PPR is for a 1 0-year Master Plan (year 2017 to 2027) to expand the South Campus and renovate facilities on the Hillside Campus. Enrollment is anticipated to increase over the period of the Master Plan to account for growth from the existing approximately 1,900 full-time equivalent (FTE) students to a maximum of 2,300 students. The proposed project includes a Zoning Map Amendment for all parcels within the South Campus to change the zoning from Industrial General, South Fair Oaks Specific 1 Plan, Height Overlay-56 (IG-SP2-HL-56) and Central District Specific Plan, Arroyo Corridor/Fair Oaks sub-district (CD-6) to Public, Semi-Public (PS). It also includes a General Plan Map Amendment to change the land use designation from Specific Plan to Institutional. Refer to Attachment B for a summary of existing and proposed zoning, General Plan land use designations, heights and Floor Area Ratios for all parcels within the South Campus. No changes to the Zoning or General Plan Map designation are proposed for the Hillside Campus. There are two phases of development in both the Hillside and South Campuses, described in detail below. Please refer to Attachment A for detailed Project Plans. Hillside Campus: Phase 1 consists of a net increase of 1,520 square feet, including: removal an existing 17,280 square foot, temporary, modular classroom building in the north parking lot; enclosure of an existing 3,500 square foot open air pavilion; installation of new photovoltaic canopies above both existing parking lots; and improvement of vehicular circulation that includes a new security guard kiosk and widening of the Lid a Street entrance.

Page 4 of 6 Phase 2 consists of: a 15,300 square foot addition to an existing 4,200 square foot maintenance building and conversion of this space for administration and transportationrelated services; and vehicular improvements in the south parking lot for improved turn radius for larger vehicles and to accommodate additional maintenance and transportation facility needs. South Campus: Phase 1 consists of: an interior remodel of the Wind Tunnel Building at 950 S. Raymond Avenue; construction of a 130,000 square foot, seven-story, 100 foot tall student housing building (retail, student housing, and parking) at 988 S. Raymond Avenue; interior renovations of the 1111 S. Arroyo Parkway building to convert existing commercial space to college administrative and academic use; and construction of a pedestrian bridge that spans across the Metro Gold Line light rail connecting the 1111 S. Arroyo Parkway building with the proposed student housing building on 988 S. Raymond Avenue. Phase 2 consists of: an addition of a new 200,000 square foot, seven-story, 100 foot tall mixed use building (housing, campus amenities, and parking) at 888 S. Raymond Avenue; Art Center is also contemplating using this building as all academic space as an alternative use; further expansion of the pedestrian bridge resulting in an elevated quad greenspace spanning over the Metro line; an addition of a 22,000 square foot gallery/exhibition space located beneath the quad green space on the ground level of the building located at 1111 S. Arroyo Parkway; and renovations of the exterior facade to the 1111 S. Arroyo Parkway. PREDEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY: Please refer to Attachment D for a summary of comments provided by various City Departments related to Art Center's entitlement and permitting process.

Page 5 of 6 PROJECT APPROVALS: The proposed Master Plan would require the following discretionary entitlements and approvals: Environmental Impact Report Zone Change Master Plan General Plan Map Amendment Design Review: The proposed Master Plan is also subject to Design Review. Pasadena Zoning Code Section 17.61.030 provides thresholds for when projects require Design Review. Phase 1 of the Hillside Campus renovations are not subject to Design Review because the 15,520 square foot addition to the maintenance shed is not located along a street frontage, not along a major corridor, and does not exceed 25,000 square feet. The proposed structures on 888 and 988 South Raymond Avenue, however, will require Commission-level Design Review because they both exceed 25,000 square feet individually. In addition, the Design Commission will also act as an advisory body in conjunction with the overall Master Plan proposal. The applicable design guidelines for the project are: the Citywide Design Principles in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, the Design Guidelines in the South Fair Oaks Specific Plan, the Design Guidelines for Neighborhood Commercial and Multi-family Residential Districts and the Central District Specific Plan. Preliminary Consultation On February 3, 2015, the Design Commission conducted a Preliminary Consultation for the proposed Master Plan. The Commission's comments are included as Attachment C. In summary, for the Hillside Campus, the Design Commission requested the preservation of the Craig Ellwood Building as part of the Master Plan and for special attention to be given to the final design and installation of the solar/photovoltaic panels in the parking areas. For the South Campus, the Design Commission suggested that Art Center should consider internal campus linkages to the general outside community, and external linkages to the streetscape and the broader community. Art Center should also consider active streetscapes, incorporate some level of interaction in spaces between the proposed and existing buildings, and utilize the location of the historic elevated bicycle track that existed in the vicinity of the newly proposed elevated quad structure upon the rail line as future inspiration. The Design Commission also commented that the South Campus improvements are generally in an area of Pasadena that could accommodate the proposed height and density and could result in revitalization of the area.

Page 6 of 6 NEXT STEPS/PROCESS: The following list identifies next steps in the review process: Submittal and review of the Master Plan o Interdepartmental review o Neighborhood meeting(s) Environmental review subject to CEQA Review of Master Plan by the Design Commission Review of Master Plan by the Planning Commission City Council consideration of the Master Plan FISCAL IMPACT: This report is for information only and will not result in any fiscal impact. Any cost associated with the Master Plan application and associated environmental review will be borne by the applicant. a; by Ha Ly, AICP Associate R nner Director of Planning & Community Development Department c~ 0Li4Q=-- Arthi Varma, AICP Principal Planner Approved by: M~ City Manager Attachments: (4) Attachment A- Project Plans Attachment B- South Campus Zoning and Land Use Tables Attachment C- Preliminary Consultation Design Commission Comments Attachment D- Summary of Pre-Development Plan Review Comments