Long-Term Variability in Methane in Domestic Water Wells in Northeast Pennsylvania

Similar documents
BASELINE WATER QUALITY SAMPLING IN SHALE GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION AREAS

Penn State Cooperative Extension

Rule 318A.f: Rule Description

Real-Time Monitoring Buoy in Mystic River Watershed

AGL UPSTREAM INVESTMENTS PTY LTD

How To Water System

Inventory of Performance Monitoring Tools for Subsurface Monitoring of Radionuclide Contamination

Data Management Tool -

EPA New England Regional Laboratory. EPA Project Team: Liz McCarthy. Matt Destino Tim Bridges Dick Siscanaw

Deployment of networks of innovative water quality sensors for distribution network monitoring Joep van den Broeke (Ph.D.)

Ion Exchange Design Hand calculation. Brian Windsor (Purolite International Ltd)

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION. Technical Document DETERMINING REPRESENTATIVE GROUND WATER SAMPLES, FILTERED OR UNFILTERED

Please find enclosed the Operational Unit 2 (OU2) Lincoln Park Water Use Survey plan for your review.

Marcellus Fast Facts

Self-Calibrating Remote Control Monitoring Systems

Weather Capture Software Guide Version 1.4 Revision: June

Nutrient Reduction by Use of Industrial Deep Injection Wells, Miami-Dade County, Florida

KARUK TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA WATER YEAR 2002 WATER QUALITY MONITORING REPORT

UPPER DESCHUTES R-EMAP TEMPERATURE SUMMARY

Produced water from oil and gas production

A White Paper Describing a Watershed-based Monitoring Network Design for the Purgatoire River Basin

Multilevel Monitoring and Characterization of the Edwards and Trinity Aquifers of Central Texas

Global GSM & Satellite Remote Monitoring

Factors Affecting Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate

Initial changes in hydrology and water quality following restoration of a shallow degraded peatland in the South west

CHAPTER 4 WELL COMPLETION AND MAINTENANCE

RECON-4 Portable Multi-gas Detector Software Manual

Develop a Quantitative Analytical Method for low (» 1 ppm) levels of Sulfate

Orbital-Scale Climate Change

DEVELOPMENT OF A WATER QUALITY MONITORING AND EARLY WARNING DETECTION SYSTEM ON THE ALLEGHENY AND MONONGAHELA RIVERS IN PENNSYLVANIA. Jerry G.

Ted Wittemann P.G., Sales and Support Specialist

Nitrate and Nitrite Removal from Municipal Drinking Water Supplies with Electrodialysis Reversal

REDUCING UNCERTAINTY IN SOLAR ENERGY ESTIMATES

AUTOCLAVE CORROSION INHIBITOR EVALUATION

Metering for today s systems

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON THE NORTHSTAR #1 CLASS II INJECTION WELL AND THE SEISMIC EVENTS IN THE YOUNGSTOWN, OHIO AREA

Gathering and Managing Environmental Quality Data for Petroleum Projects ABSTRACT

Overall Planning for Developing a New Vineyard: Site Selection and Assessment. Ed Hellman Viticulture Extension Specialist

Water Distribution System Wireless Monitoring Solutions

Hardness Comparisons

3-D Data Visualization Taking the Next Step in Data Presentation

Guy Carpenter Asia-Pacific Climate Impact Centre, School of energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong

Sea Water Heat Pump Project

National Groundwater Monitoring Network- New Jersey Pilot

Water Softening for Hardness Removal. Hardness in Water. Methods of Removing Hardness 5/1/15. WTRG18 Water Softening and Hardness

Estimating Firn Emissivity, from 1994 to1998, at the Ski Hi Automatic Weather Station on the West Antarctic Ice Sheet Using Passive Microwave Data

Analyzing Weather Data

Pressure in Fluids. Introduction

Sustainable Schools Renewable Energy Technologies. Andrew Lyle RD Energy Solutions

Community Environmental Monitoring Program (CEMP) of the Eagle Mine, Marquette County, Michigan

The Impact of Marcellus Gas Drilling on Rural Drinking Water Supplies

Christopher Harto Argonne National Laboratory

Monitoring strategies for CO 2. Nick Riley Jonathan Pearce. Storage

Find what matters. Information Alchemy Turning Your Building Data Into Money

ON-LINE DIAGNOSTIC CASE STUDY INVOLVING A GENERAL ELECTRIC TYPE U BUSHING

ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS OF WATER-LEVEL MONITORING PROGRAMS. Selection of Observation Wells

Data Management Tool. October 18, Developed by: Funded by: Research Office of Information Technology

Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania: A 2,600 Well Study of Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR) 2015 Update

Environmentally Friendly Drilling Systems. Technology Integration Program. Case Study Chalk Hill Ranch/Dewitt County Field Trial 2, Texas June 2013

GAS WELL/WATER WELL SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION

FINAL REPORT LIFE-CYCLE COST STUDY OF A GEOTHERMAL HEAT PUMP SYSTEM BIA OFFICE BLDG., WINNEBAGO, NE

Summer Holidays Questions

The Ambient Air Monitoring System

Grade 4 Standard 1 Unit Test Water Cycle. Multiple Choice. 1. Where is most water found on Earth? A. in glaciers B. in lakes C. in rivers D.

REPORT OF WORK GUIDELINES

Hydrologic Data Program Overview. Rio Grande Estuary, and Lower Laguna Madre Basin and Bay Area Stakeholder Committee (BBASC)

Health Consultation. Chesapeake ATGAS 2H Well Site Leroy Hill Road, Leroy Leroy Township, Bradford County, Pennsylvania OCTOBER 29, 2013

Swamp Area Passive Treatment System Kettle Creek Watershed, Clinton County, PA

Culligan Exchange Tank Deionization Service

USB-500 Series Stand-Alone, Low-Cost Data Loggers

A Project to Create Bias-Corrected Marine Climate Observations from ICOADS

Automated Equipment Data Analytics to Detect Issues, Trends, Faults & Anomalies

Preparatory Paper on Focal Areas to Support a Sustainable Energy System in the Electricity Sector

GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS

THE GEORGIA AUTOMATED ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING NETWORK: TEN YEARS OF WEATHER INFORMATION FOR WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

USB-500/600 Series Low-Cost Data Loggers and Accessories

Hardness - Multivalent metal ions which will form precipitates with soaps. e.g. Ca 2+ + (soap) Ca(soap) 2 (s)

Mixing Heights & Smoke Dispersion. Casey Sullivan Meteorologist/Forecaster National Weather Service Chicago

Life After Getting a BS and MS Degree Working as a Professional in PA

Relative Humidity Calibration Kit

Building Environmental Monitoring Infrastructures

Dewatering Calculations, Treatment and Supporting Documentation

ENE 806, Project Report 3 CHEMICAL PRECIPITATION: WATER SOFTENING. Grégoire Seyrig Wenqian Shan

Eastern Caribbean Open-Source Geospatial Data Sharing and Management Workshop

How To Use A Water Quality Monitor (Wqmsw)

USB-500 Series Low-Cost Data Loggers and Accessories

Dissolved Gas Analysis Guide for Transformers Filled with Beta Fluid

Southern AER Atmospheric Education Resource

GETTING TO THE CORE: THE LINK BETWEEN TEMPERATURE AND CARBON DIOXIDE

SEAN Freshwater Water Quality Data User Guide

Groundwater Potential of Basement Aquifers in Part of Southwestern Nigeria

Link 2 Vehicle Maintenance System

Draft Case Study for xx CDM Landfill Gas Project presented at a World Bank Workshop Page 1 of 16 BANDEIRANTES-SAO PAULO-BRAZIL FOR CASE STUDIES

Ground Water Rule Request for 4-log Certification Chlorination

Remediation Services & Technology

Wireless Data Logger Monitoring Systems

Energy Performance Indicators (EnPI) Tim Dantoin Focus on Energy

Environmental Equipment, Inc. IMR 5000 Continuous Flue Gas Monitoring System IMR 5000

Temporal variation in snow cover over sea ice in Antarctica using AMSR-E data product

Environmental Data Services for Delaware:

Transcription:

GROUNDWATER & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. Denise Good, PE Richard Wardrop, PG Debby Yost Bert Smith, PG Long-Term Variability in Methane in Domestic Water Wells in Northeast Pennsylvania Charles Whisman, PE Chief Technology Officer GES CWhisman@gesonline.com

Study Background Methane (CH 4 ) Prevalence and Variability Lack of water well construction standards General findings from extensive pre drill data Water well samples collected (29 211): 11,312 Methane detections (>.26 mg/l): 2,74 (24.2%) >.26 to 3 mg/l: 2,64 (18.2%) >3 to 7 mg/l: 287 (2.5%) >7 to 2 mg/l: 27 (2.4%) >2 mg/l: 119 (1.1%) Limited understanding of natural methane variation and occurrence related to complaints

Long-Term Monitoring: Domestic Wells Address gaps in understanding Quantify natural variation in methane levels Relevance Significant importance in assessing natural methane variation and occurrence Study Objective Gain understanding of long term variability of methane in domestic water wells and correlation to other parameters, such as well usage and pumping

Study Design 11 domestic water wells Pre drill (baseline) sampling data used to select sites 3 categories of baseline dissolved methane levels Low: < 5 mg/l Medium: 5 to 15 mg/l High: > 15 mg/l 3 4 wells from each category Depths: 4 to 3 feet Located across Bradford and Sullivan Counties in Northeastern Pennsylvania 12 months of monitoring

Study Locations

General Outline: Study Parameters Local and Regional Geology Supply Well Construction and Conditions Manual Water Sampling for Laboratory Analysis No dissolved methane sensor available Continuous Remote Monitoring Headspace gas parameters (CH 4, CO 2, O 2 ) Water well parameters (water levels, turbidity) Weather Parameters Data logged and manually downloaded (temperature, barometric pressure, humidity, wind, precipitation)

Preparation of Study Water Wells Water treatment system installation or upgrade Borehole geophysics Downhole InSitu water quality logging (ph, temp., cond.) Supply well power re configuration Jet pumps replaced with submersible pumps (2 wells)

Remote Real-Time Monitoring Parameters Well Headspace CH 4 (1 ppm to 1% volume, 2 sensors) O 2 CO 2 Gas flow Gas pressure Down Well Water level Turbidity Pump flow rate

Real-Time Data Data logged every minute Transferred via cell modem Uploaded to custom software Uploaded to secure website Choose location via list or map Graphs, statistics, raw data Data integrated with Microsoft Access, EarthSoft EQuIS and other data management tools 9

Equipment Setup Equipment customized at each site Headspace gas drawn from ~2 feet below well grade using sample pump Weather Stations at 6 locations Barometric pressure Precipitation Temperature Wind Humidity

Water Type and Geologic Setting Location Mapped Bedrock Formation Water-Type MB Lock Haven Sodium - Bicarbonate T Lock Haven Sodium - Bicarbonate B Lock Haven Sodium - Bicarbonate DV Catskill Sodium - Bicarbonate/Chloride G Lock Haven Sodium/Calcium -Bicarbonate V Catskill Sodium/Calcium -Bicarbonate N Catskill Sodium/Calcium -Bicarbonate TB Lock Haven Sodium - Chloride H Catskill Sodium - Chloride R Lock Haven Sodium - Chloride EH Catskill Calcium/Sodium - Bicarbonate

Analytical Data Assessment Tracking data to determine relationships with methane and key dissolved constituents: Sulfate Chloride Methane and Sulfate in Water: Site R Barium Lithium Strontium

Variation in Dissolved Methane in Groundwater Dissolved Methane Variability: Site EH EH Location 2 18 16 Methane, mg/l 14 12 1 8 6 4 2 Baseline Sample

Dissolved Methane Variation: Low Level (<5 mg/l) Baseline Baseline Baseline Baseline

Dissolved Methane Variation: Medium Level (5-15 mg/l) Baseline Baseline Baseline

Dissolved Methane Seasonal Variation: Medium Level (5-15 mg/l) 3 25 Number of Samples Spring: 48 Summer: 21 Fall: 23 Winter: 48 Methane, mg/l 2 15 1 5 Spring Summer Fall Winter Season

Dissolved Methane Variation: High Level (>15 mg/l) Baseline Baseline

Dissolved Methane Seasonal Variation: High Level (>15 mg/l) 7 6 Number of Samples Spring: 39 Summer: 14 Fall: 9 Winter: 19 5 Methane, mg/l 4 3 2 1 Spring Summer Fall Winter Season

Turbidity vs Water Level: Site B 2 Turbidity, NTU 18 5 16 1 14 15 12 1 2 8 25 6 3 4 35 2 Turbidity Water Level 4 2/4/212 : 2/4/212 12: 2/5/212 : 2/5/212 12: 2/6/212 : 2/6/212 12: 2/7/212 : Water Level Change from Initial Static, ft

Headspace Methane vs. Water Level Change in 24 Hours EH Location Headspace Methane vs Water Level: 24 Hours (Site EH) 35 Methane, ppm 3 25 2 15 1 5 12/5/211 6: 12/5/211 8:24 12/5/211 1:48 12/5/211 13:12 Headspace Methane 12/5/211 15:36 12/5/211 18: Water Level Change 12/5/211 2:24 12/5/211 22:48 12/6/211 1:12 12/6/211 3:36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 12/6/211 6: Water Level Change from Initial Static, ft

Observing Methane Trends over Different Time Intervals Headspace Methane vs. Water Level Change in 24 Hours EH Location 55 Headspace Methane Water Level Change 1 Day Duration 1 Headspace Methane vs. Water Level Change in 72 Hours EH Location 55 Headspace Methane Water Level Change 3 Day Duration 1 Methane, ppm 45 35 25 15 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Water Level Change from Initial Static, ft Methane, ppm 45 35 25 15 5 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Water Level Change from Initial Static, ft -5 1 6/3/212 : 6/3/212 12: 7/1/212 : -5 1 6/3/212 : 7/1/212 : 7/2/212 : 7/3/212 : Methane, ppm 55 Headspace Methane 45 35 25 15 5 Headspace Methane vs. Water Level Change in 7 Days EH Location Water Level Change 7 Day Duration 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Water Level Change from Initial Static, ft -5 1 6/3/212 : 7/1/212 : 7/2/212 : 7/3/212 : 7/4/212 : 7/5/212 : 7/6/212 : 7/7/212 :

Headspace Methane vs Water Level: Site MB 2 1.8 25 35 Methane, ppm 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.8.6.4.2 Headspace Methane Depth to Water Fracture 5/3/213 : 5/4/213 : 5/5/213 : 5/6/213 : 5/7/213 : 45 55 65 75 85 95 15 Depth to Water (feet below grade)

Headspace Methane vs. Water Level Change in 6 Hours DV Location Headspace Methane vs Water Level: 6 Hours (Site DV) 14 Methane, ppm 12 1 8 6 4 2 Headspace Methane Water Level Change 14 5/12/212 12: 5/12/212 13:12 5/12/212 14:24 5/12/212 15:36 5/12/212 16:48 5/12/212 18: 2 4 6 8 1 12 Water Level Change from Initial Static, ft

Comparison Between Groundwater Methane vs. Headspace Methane Over Time Headspace Methane vs Dissolved Methane: Site EH 12 Groundwater Methane 12 1 Headspace Methane 1 8 6 4 Groundwater Methane mg/l Headspace Methane ppm 8 6 4 2 2 1/12/211 1/24/211 11/1/211 11/8/211 12/1/211 12/15/211 12/28/211 1/12/212 1/26/212 2/9/212 2/23/212 3/6/212 3/22/212 4/2/212 4/19/212 5/3/212 5/17/212

Variability in Headspace Methane over Time: Site EH January 212 Methane, ppm April 212 July 212 July 212 October 212

Headspace Methane vs Water Temp vs Air Temp vs Water Level: Site G.5% Vol = 5, ppm = 1% LEL Note: All data is preliminary

Methane vs Carbon Dioxide Well Headspace: Site MB Methane, % Volume Carbon Dioxide, ppm.5% Vol = 5, ppm = 1% LEL Note: All data is preliminary

Preliminary Findings Methane occurs naturally and highly variable: Spatially and temporally Weather Man induced changes (water well pumping) Single pre drill baseline methane sample may not represent the full range of natural variability Natural methane levels (headspace and dissolved) may be influenced by pumping or water level fluctuations Water level declines (pumping or natural) may increase natural methane headspace concentrations Natural methane concentrations may vary seasonally

GROUNDWATER & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,INC. Denise Good, PE Richard Wardrop, PG Thank You! Debby Yost Bert Smith, PG Long-Term Variability in Methane in Domestic Water Wells in Northeast Pennsylvania Charles Whisman, PE Chief Technology Officer GES CWhisman@gesonline.com