Sharing the urban space: a story

Transcription

1 Sharing the urban space: a story of stakeholder support Prof. Dr., Sara Verlinde MOBI research team

2 MOBI: themes and tools Goteburg Page 2

3 Content 4 A s of sustainable city distribution Why it fails? Evaluation framework Case: Mobile Depot of TNT in Brussels Conclusions Goteburg Page 3

4 Sustainable city distribution Rush and land use in town Insecurity in traffic, or external security (hazardous substances) Logistics is a condition for economic activity, but it also causes nuisance Congestion Emissions, bad smell, noise for residents Goteburg Page 4

5 Sustainable city distribution Growth Efficiency Employment Competitiveness Choice Economy Society Safety Health Accessibility Equity Sustainable Logistics Environment Climate change Air quality Noise Land use Biodiversity Waste Goteburg Page 5

6 Sustainable city distribution: Act? Seems simple, but Break even point investment EUR Does the business know all options that are economically interesting? Naar Scheffer et al., 2007 Opportunities for cooperation Contribution government? Do we know the social return in? Social Return Economic Return Who is responsible for what? What is a good distribution of the investment? Talk, postpone, pilots or legislation required? Goteburg Page 6

7 Goteburg Page 7 van Lier & Macharis,

8 2012: 4 A s of sustainable CD Awareness Act and shift Avoidance Anticipation Les best of de la Mobilité 8 Goteburg Page 8

9 Avoid Goteburg Page 9

10 Act and shift it to other transportmodes Goteburg Page 10

11 Pallets on the waterway Goteburg Page 11 11

12 Anticipate cleaner technologies Goteburg Page 12

13 Electric Goteburg Page 13

14 TCO Analysis TCO ( cents/km) CO2 (g/km) Payload > 600kg Payload btw 600kg and 800kg Payload > 800kg Goteburg Page 14

15 The known OEM s are coming... Goteburg Page 15

16 Larger : Hybrids Goteburg Page 16 16

17 Possible solutions Avoid! Act! Anticipate! But several implementations fail Goteburg Page 17

18 Why do urban distribution solutions tend to fail?

19 Sustainable urban freight transport framework Source : Behrends, 2011 Goteburg Page 19

20 Receiver / Shipper Stakeholder Facilities 2 Actors involved Products Land Infrastructure Vehicles Goods Authorities / Citizen Logistics service provider Goteburg Page 20

21 Why it fails Goteburg Page 21

22 Why it fails (2) The list is long: Leiden Malaga Nuremberg Utrecht Goteburg Page 22

23 Goteburg Page 23

24 OBJECTIVES Goteburg Page 24

25 MAMCA (Macharis, 2004) Goteburg Page 25 Vrije Universiteit Vrije Universiteit Brussel MOBI Brussel MOSI - Transport & Logistics Mobility and Automotive Technology

26 Goteburg Page 26

27 Stage 1: Description and assessment Context and current situation Alternative situation Window of opportunities Description of current way of working Description of context Description of possible alternatives First assessment of the possible alternatives Stakeholders & objectives Alternative concepts I N P U Indicators Measurement methods T Stage 2: Evaluation Costs and benefits to society Integration of stakeholders opinions Benchmarking Financial viability Stage 3: Recommendations and lessons learned Policy impact assessment Roadmaps towards industrial roll-out Transferability to other cities Prioritization of measures

28 Case TNT Express

29 TNT-Brussels 5,5 x 11,6km Goteburg Page 29

30 Mobile depot 1 x Goteburg Page 30

31 Alternatives to be compared 1. New concept: mobile depot and tricycle couriers (real data from 3 months test) 2. Original way of working: inner-city distribution from the TNT depot with vans and small trucks (real data) 3. Intermediate way of working: inner-city distribution from cycle courier s depot with electrically driven tricycles (real data) 4. Additional concept: mobile depot and small electric car (real data) Goteburg Page 31

32 Stakeholders

33 Objectives TNT EXPRESS Owner of the project Cost-efficiency Employee satisfaction Less emissions Smooth information flows Customer satisfaction Goteburg Page 33

34 Objectives CUSTOMER TNT EXPRESS Smooth pick-ups Satisfied consignees Low cost deliveries Customer satisfaction might change Changed delivery times Goteburg Page 34

35 Objectives CONSIGNEES Changed delivery times and punctuality Smooth deliveries Attractive physical urban environment Less congestion Traffic safety No noise nuisance Les emissions Less visual nuisance Safety of his goods Goteburg Page 35

36 Objectives LOCAL AUTHORITIES Fewer TNT vehicles in Brussels Mobile depot will be parked in the city centre Efficient urban deliveries Attractive physical urban environment Less congestion Traffic safety No noise nuisance Low cost measures Les emissions Less visual nuisance Attractive urban environment for companies Goteburg Page 36

37 Objectives CITIZENS Reduced noise/emissions/traffic due to the use of electric tricycles Attractive physical urban environment Less congestion Traffic safety No noise nuisance Les emissions Less visual nuisance Good availability of a wide range of products in shops Goteburg Page 37

38 Step 6: City of Antwerp MCA and MAMCA Goteburg Page 38 3

39 Step 6: Multi actor view MCA and MAMCA Goteburg Page 39 3

40 Conclusions Stakeholder involvement is necessary MAMCA enables to do this in a structured way STRAIGHTSOL framework provides an evaluation framework of city distribution concepts Goteburg Page 40

41 Thank you for your attention! Sara Verlinde Contact: