UTILISATION IN OECD COUNTRIES

Transcription

1 INEQUALITIES IN HEALTH CARE UTILISATION IN OECD COUNTRIES Marion Devaux, OECD Health Division EU Expert Group Meeting on Social Determinants and Health Inequalities, 21-Jan

2 Equity OECD framework for health system performance assessment Health status Non-health care determinants of health Health care system performance Quality Access Expenditure Efficiency Health system design, policy and context Source: OECD Health at a Glance 2011

3 Previous work on inequalities in health care use 3

4 Objective of the study To update earlier results on inequity in health care use (van Doorslaer and Masseria, 2004) to extend the analysis to new health care services and to new OECD countries. To examine inequalities in conjunction with health systems characteristics (with focus on financial barriers) 4

5 Methods Measuring inequities by income level in doctor visits by adjusting for differences in people s need for health care. Horizontal equity principle Measuring income-related inequalities in dentist visits and breast and cervical cancer screening. Concentration index to measure the degree of inequality/inequity. 5

6 Data Latest national health survey data for 19 OECD countries Doctor visits in the past 12 months Dentist visits Breast & cervical cancer screening Needs for health care Individual characteristics Income level of the household. 19 OECD countries Austria (EHIS 2006/7) Belgium (EHIS 2008) Canada 2007/08 Czech republic (EHIS 2008) Denmark 2005 Estonia (EHIS 2006/7) Finland 2009 France 2008 Germany 2009 Hungary( EHIS 2009) Ireland 2007 New Zealand Poland (EHIS 2009) Slovak republic (EHIS 2009) Slovenia (EHIS 2007) Spain 2009 Switzerland 2007 United Kingdom 2009 United States

7 GP visits in the past 12 months France Belgium New Zealand Austria Canada Slovak Republic Spain Hungary United Kingdom Ireland Czech Republic Poland Slovenia Estonia Switzerland Finland Denmark* Need-adjusted probability of a GP visit in last 12 months by income quintile (age 16-85) Lowest income quintile (*) in past 3 months in Denmark Average Highest income quintile Rates of GP visits in the past 12 months Small variations across income groups. Before need-adjustment, low-income people are more likely to see a GP in 13 of 17 countries. After need-adjustment, low-income people are as likely as high-income people to see a GP (in 8 of 17 countries). Once they go to visit a GP, low-income people are more likely to consult more often. Source: OECD Health Working Paper No 58. Devaux and de Looper,

8 Specialist visits in the past 12 months Large variations across income groups, low-income people being less likely to see a specialist in all countries. Need-adjusted probability of a specialist visit in last 12 months by income quintile (age 16-85) Hungary Czech Republic France Canada Slovak Republic Spain Switzerland Belgium Poland Estonia Slovenia United Kingdom Finland New Zealand Denmark* Lowest income quintile Average Highest income quintile (*) in past 3 months in Denmark Rates of specialist visits in the past 12 months Source: OECD Health Working Paper No 58. Devaux and de Looper,

9 Inequity Index in GP and Specialist visits Inequity in GP visits Inequity in Specialist visits Pro-rich inequity Pro-rich inequity Pro-poor inequity (*) in past 3 months in Denmark Source: OECD Health Working Paper No 58. Devaux and de Looper,

10 Dentist visits in the past 12 months Czech Republic United Kingdom Slovak Republic Switzerland Canada Austria Finland Belgium Slovenia Ireland New Zealand Estonia Spain United States Poland Hungary Probability of a dentist visit in last 12 months by income quintile (age 16-85) Lowest income quintile Average Highest income quintile People with higher incomes are more likely to visit a dentist Main reasons = Financial barriers Dental care not -or only partly- reimbursed under health insurance plans France* Denmark** Rates of dentist visits in the past 12 months (*) France past 24 months; (**)Denmark past 3 months. Source: OECD Health Working Paper No 58. Devaux and de Looper,

11 Pro-rich inequality in cancer screening United States Austria Spain Slovenia Canada New Zealand France Poland Denmark Belgium Czech Republic Hungary Slovak Republic United Kingdom Switzerland Estonia Ireland* Probability of cervical cancer screening in last 3 years by income quintile (age 20-69) Lowest income quintile Average Highest income quintile Rates of cervical cancer screening in the past 3 years (*) Ireland: in past 12 months Source: OECD Health Working Paper No 58. In countries with cancer screening programmes, services are made available to all at little or no cost Despite this, uptake varies among socioeconomic groups Often, geographic reasons such travelling distance or availability of screening facilities create many barriers Lower levels of awareness of programmes, symptoms or risks, especially among women with low incomes or from minority groups 11

12 Comparison with earlier findings Country ranking remained rather stable Inequities remained very stable for doctor and GP visits. Some discrepancies found for specialist (Finland) and dentist visits (Finland, Ireland, and Spain) mainly due to differences in survey methodology and wording of questions. 12

13 Inequality index (CI) Inequity index (HI) Inequity index (HI) Comparison with earlier findings Panel A. GP visits: probability Panel B. Specialist visits: probability project Van Doorslaer & Masseria (2004) 2011 project Van Doorslaer & Masseria (2004) 0.2 Panel C. Dentist visits: probability project Van Doorslaer & Masseria (2004) 13

14 Which health system features characterise countries with lower levels of inequity? Organisation of health systems Financing of health care services Cultural and information barriers 14

15 Inequity in specialist visits Inequality in dental visits Out-of-pocket payments (OOP) A greater share of OOP is associated with greater inequity in specialist and dental care. Weak correlation possibly because countries with high OOP have introduced measures to offset the negative effects on access Belgium Canada Estonia Poland Hungary Spain R² = Belgium Finland Spain Poland Switzerland Slovenia R² = France Austria Czech Republic Finland Slovak Republic New Zealand 0 Slovenia Hungary Czech Republic Out-of-pocket payment as % of total expenditure on specialist care Out-of-pocket payment as % of total dental expenditure Source: OECD Health Working Paper No

16 38% 29% 25% 44% 42% 41% 41% 58% 61% 51% 46% 58% 57% 74% 78% 67% 70% 65% 76% 69% Probability of a medical visist Private Health Insurance (PHI) PHI facilitates the use of care, with the privately insured more likely to visit specialists and dentists. 100% Privately insured Not privately insured 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% France* New Zealand* United Kingdom United States* France* New Zealand* Switzerland* Switzerland* United Kingdom* United States* Specialist visits Dentist visits Source: OECD Health Working Paper No

17 Concluding remarks Update of previous work Inequities in health care utilisation persist across OECD countries For the same level of needs, the better-off are more likely to visit doctors - especially specialists and dentists - than those with lower incomes. Need for strengthening equity 17

18 Possible policy action to strengthen equal access to care Reducing financial barriers Targeting population the most at risk Increasing coverage of dental and eye care? Trade-off with other objectives such as controlling public spending to reduce budgetary deficits? Reducing non-financial barriers Geographic distribution of services Social dimension (education level, ethnic and language) 18

19 More information OECD Health Working paper No. 58 Income-Related Inequalities in Health Service Utilisation in 19 OECD Countries, Devaux, M. and M. de Looper (2012) OECD Health at a Glance OECD Health at a Glance Europe

20 This paper was produced for a meeting organized by Health & Consumers DG and represents the views of its author on the subject. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved by the Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission's or Health & Consumers DG's views. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof.